PDA

View Full Version : Trump Supporters Monitoring Polls Alarms Voting-Rights Groups



Cebu_4_2
3rd November 2016, 02:42 PM
Will look for more...

Trump Supporters Monitoring Polls Alarms Voting-Rights Groups

The Republican presidential nominee has been exhorting his supporters to be vigilant about the supposed threat of voter fraud, which has been shown to be almost nonexistent in the U.S.

Lauren Etter (http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/authors/ASFjLS119J4/lauren-etter)

Janan Hanna (http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/authors/ASZYud5lV2w/janan-hanna)

https://assets.bwbx.io/politics/public/images/logos/businessweek-5ab1d0e1ce.svg (https://subscribe.businessweek.com/servlet/OrdersGateway?cds_mag_code=BWK&cds_page_id=179897)

October 13, 2016 — 5:00 AM EDT
Share on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fbloom.bg%2F2ejmFaX)Share on Twitter (https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbloom.bg%2F2ejmFaX&text=Voting%20rights%20groups%20worry%20over%20Tru mp%20supporters%20monitoring%20polls&via=bpolitics)


https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/i3tY9oAwEd8g/v0/488x-1.jpg

Supporters of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump show their support for him before the start of the campaign event for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton at the Miami Dade College - Kendall Campus, Theodore Gibson Center on October 11, 2016 in Miami, Florida.

Photographer: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Share on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fbloom.bg%2F2ejmFaX)Share on Twitter (https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbloom.bg%2F2ejmFaX&text=Voting%20rights%20groups%20worry%20over%20Tru mp%20supporters%20monitoring%20polls&via=bpolitics)
Share on LinkedIn (http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?title=Trump%20Supporters%20Monitoring %20Polls%20Alarms%20Voting-Rights%20Groups&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbloom.bg%2F2ejmFaX)Share on Reddit (http://reddit.com/submit?title=Trump%20Supporters%20Monitoring%20Pol ls%20Alarms%20Voting-Rights%20Groups&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbloom.bg%2F2ejmFaX)Share on Google+ (https://plus.google.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbloom.bg%2F2ejmFaX)E-mail

For the first time in a half-century, Americans will go to the polls in November without the full protection of the Voting Rights Act. Following a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling invalidating a key section of the 1965 law, the U.S. Department of Justice has had to curtail its federal observer program, under which trained monitors oversee access to ballot boxes in areas historically prone to discrimination.

The shift comes just as Republican nominee Donald Trump has been exhorting his supporters to be vigilant about the supposed threat of voter fraud, which has been shown to be almost nonexistent in the U.S. “They’re letting people pour into the country so they can go and vote,” he said in an Oct. 7 meeting with the union representing U.S. Border Patrol agents. At a Pennsylvania rally on Oct. 10, he told the crowd, “So important that you watch other communities, because we don’t want this election stolen from us.” An online movement called Operation Red is encouraging Trump supporters to wear red to the polls so people “will have no choice but to acknowledge the visible truth in a sea of red,” according to the group’s website.

Trump’s campaign lawyer, Donald McGahn, met in August with members of the Republican National Lawyers Association to discuss strategies for monitoring the voting process on Election Day. The group’s chairman, Randy Evans, says the group plans to have on-call lawyers trained in state rules and ready to coordinate with poll watchers and local election authorities to handle any complaints, including those collected on dedicated voter hotlines. These could include precincts opening late or closing early, having too few voting machines or ballots, or allowing voters to cast more than one ballot, Evans says, adding, “The one that worries us most is if there’s any kind of effort at intimidation or of dissuading voters from showing up.”

Democratic groups are girding for what they see as rising voter suppression. Following a model established by President Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012, Hillary Clinton’s campaign is recruiting attorneys for Victory Counsel, a group of volunteers who will staff hotlines or serve as observers on Election Day. The campaign didn’t return calls for comment.

Nonprofit groups such as the League of Women Voters and the League of United Latin American Citizens are training poll watchers across the country. They’re concerned about new state laws that make it more difficult for citizens to vote, including Wisconsin’s strict voter ID law, as well as a flood of inexperienced election monitors. “Poll watchers left unchecked may unfairly target minority voters,” says Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the nonprofit Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which is expecting as many as 5,000 volunteers, twice as many as it had in 2014, to field phone calls from voters and election officials regarding irregularities. “It creates the potential for a lot of mischief, chaos, and disruption on Election Day.”

Most states allow at least one observer from each party to monitor voting activity, though rules vary about whether they can go into the polling places or must stay outside. Some states, including Georgia and South Carolina, require poll watchers to wear a badge indicating their name and organization. In Texas, people aren’t allowed to carry firearms into polling sites, but in Pennsylvania they are. In Tennessee and other states, to prevent intimidation, law enforcement officers aren’t allowed in polling centers.

Pennsylvania state Representative Rick Saccone, a Republican, is trying to pass a bill before Election Day that would loosen rules restricting poll watchers to their own counties. Critics say letting observers travel anywhere in the state raises the possibility of white election monitors intimidating voters in minority areas, but Saccone dismisses that: “The notion that there will be roving bands of poll watchers disrupting elections is just nonsense.”

An Ohio federal court found in 2004 that “the presence of vast numbers of challengers inexperienced in the electoral process” imposes a “severe burden” on the right to vote. The suit was filed by a couple in a mostly black Cincinnati neighborhood who challenged a state GOP plan to put representatives in “as many precincts as possible.”

Federal law prohibits conduct that would intimidate voters or otherwise discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity. That includes direct confrontation with voters, using threatening language or raised voices, and disseminating misleading information on elections, according to New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. Lawrence Norden, deputy director of the Brennan Center’s democracy program, says there’s a “real role” for citizens to be involved in supervising elections to ensure they’re transparent. But, he says, “the difficulty is that a lot of regular citizens are not going to know what the law is.”

Cebu_4_2
3rd November 2016, 02:46 PM
Trump loyalists plan own exit poll amid claims of 'rigged' election

Effort led by Trump confidante and conspiracy theorist Roger Stone targets cities with large minority populations, a tactic experts say could intimidate voters

(https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/20/citizens-for-donald-trump-exit-poll-roger-stone-rigged-election-claim#img-1) Donald Trump has been stoking fears of voter fraud and refused to say during the final debate that he would definitely accept the outcome of the election. Photograph: Ty Wright/Getty Images Oliver Laughland (https://www.theguardian.com/profile/laughland-oliver) and Sam Thielman (https://www.theguardian.com/profile/sam-thielman) in New York

Thursday 20 October 2016 17.40 EDT Last modified on Thursday 3 November 2016 11.27 ED

Donald Trump (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/donaldtrump) loyalists will attempt to conduct their own crowd-funded exit polling on election day, ostensibly due to fears that electronic voting machines in certain areas may have been “rigged”, the Guardian has learned.
But the effort, led by Trump’s notorious informal adviser Roger Stone, will focus on 600 different precincts in nine Democrat-leaning cities with large minority populations, a tactic branded highly irregular by experts, who suggested that organizers could potentially use the polling as a way to intimidate voters.

Donald Trump says he will accept US election result 'if I win'

Stone told the Guardian that around 1,300 volunteers from the controversial Citizens for Trump grassroots coalition would conduct exit polling in Cleveland, Detroit, Philadelphia, Las Vegas, Milwaukee, Fort Lauderdale, Charlotte, Richmond and Fayetteville – all locations in pivotal swing states.

Media organizations and political campaigns conduct exit polling for all major elections, but David Paleologos – a polling expert and director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center – said effective exit polling was done in bellwether precincts, not in areas likely to be dominated by a particular political party.

“It doesn’t sound like that’s a traditional exit poll,” Paleologos said of Stone’s planned efforts. “It sounds like that’s just gathering data, in heavily Democratic areas for some purpose. It doesn’t sound like exit polling.”

The Republican nominee said during Wednesday’s debate he would keep America “in suspense” over whether he would accept the outcome of the vote on 8 November, and on Thursday he said (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/20/donald-trump-us-election-result) he would accept only “if I win” or if it is a “clear” result. He has frequently told his supporters (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/18/donald-trump-rejects-election-result-before-the-votes-have-been-counted) that the election is being “rigged” against him, and since August his campaign has been recruiting election observers (https://www.donaldjtrump.com/landing/volunteer-to-be-a-trump-election-observer) in anticipation of what he claims could be widespread voter fraud.

On Thursday, Stone, a noted conspiracy theorist (http://www.salon.com/2015/01/28/roger_stone_vs_the_world_inside_the_conspiracy_fil led_mind_of_legendary_gop_trickster/), argued that the campaign had focused their efforts to combat the so-called “rigged election” in the wrong area and should instead concentrate on “election theft” via hacked or compromised voting machines.

“To those who say that it would be un-American to challenge the election on the basis that it was rigged, I would argue it would be un-American to have evidence of that rigging and not challenge the election,” Stone said.

Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/dialog/share?app_id=180444840287&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fus-news%2Fvideo%2F2016%2Foct%2F19%2Fdonald-trump-accept-election-result-debate-video&picture=)
Twitter (https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=%27I%27ll%20keep%20you%20in%20suspense% 27%3A%20Trump%20refuses%20to%20say%20he%20will%20a ccept%20election%20result%20%E2%80%93%20video&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fus-news%2Fvideo%2F2016%2Foct%2F19%2Fdonald-trump-accept-election-result-debate-video)
Pinterest
(http://www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?description=%27I%27ll%20keep%20you%20in%20suspens e%27%3A%20Trump%20refuses%20to%20say%20he%20will%2 0accept%20election%20result%20%E2%80%93%20video&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fus-news%2Fvideo%2F2016%2Foct%2F19%2Fdonald-trump-accept-election-result-debate-video&media=)
‘I’ll keep you in suspense’: Trump refuses to say he will accept election result (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2016/oct/19/donald-trump-accept-election-result-debate-video) Experts have taken several steps to remedy the digital vulnerabilities in voting machines in recent years. Last year at least one voting machine system was found to be substantially insecure. Princeton researcher Jeremy Epstein, now of technology firm SRI, discovered that WinVote machines used in Virginia could be accessed comparatively easily (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/15/virginia-hacking-voting-machines-security) over a Wi-Fi connection through simple passwords. Epstein successfully pushed to have the machines decertified.

Follow along for the latest updates from the trail, as Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and co engage in a last-minute sprint across battleground states

Epstein told the Guardian that exit polls in particular were a dangerously inaccurate way to gauge the legitimacy of an election. “There’s a lot of evidence that exit polls are not very accurate,” Epstein said. “People don’t tell the pollsters what they actually did. In this election, depending on the neighborhood, people might not want to admit that they voted for Clinton or that they voted for Trump.”

There are already methods in place to determine the accuracy of the results in a contested district. “Roughly 75, 80% of all voters in this election will use paper ballots,” Epstein said, “so even if the machines were hacked, we’d have the paper ballots to go back to in most cases, especially in states where they do audits.”

The Department of Homeland Security is already taking precautions to make sure election results are not interfered with electronically. “To date, 33 state and 11 county or local election agencies have approached the Department of Homeland Security about our cybersecurity services,” the department said in a press release issued 10 October. DHS continues to offer “cyber-hygiene” services to other state or local boards looking for protection against hacking.

Rick Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California, shared Epstein’s concerns over using exit polls as way of measuring the legitimacy of an election and warned: “It doesn’t sound like a scientific way to do things, nor do I think it’s a sound way to ferret out machine problems, it sounds much more like a Roger Stone dirty trick.”

Stone, who did not identify the particular precincts volunteers would be targeting, argued that the polling methodology, was “designed by professionals”, but was unable to identify who these professionals were. The former Richard Nixon adviser added that the effort was being run by the “Stop the Steal” organization, a group founded by Stone in the lead up to the Republican national convention in July, which organized protests aimed at preventing party delegates from taking the nomination away from Trump.

The Citizens for Trump coalition, which will supply volunteers for the polling, was also present at the Republican convention and organized a large rally in Cleveland alongside a host of fringe organizations, including armed vigilantes group Bikers for Trump (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/19/bikers-for-trump-republican-convention-open-carry) and the conspiracy theorist website Infowars.

“It sounds like he’s organizing a goon squad that could potentially be intimidating voters in minority areas,” said Hasen. “It does raise the threat of violence on election day at polling places. People are going to have to be vigilant.”

Cebu_4_2
3rd November 2016, 02:58 PM
Trump Ally Roger Stone Scrambling to Create Election Day Operation

by Leigh Ann Caldwell

Controversial Donald Trump ally Roger Stone has vowed to check the validity of the presidential election results by setting up what he describes as his own exit-polling operation outside of select precincts around the country on Election Day. Stone calls it "a monumental undertaking" and one that he claims could either validate or call into question the outcome on November 8.

Stone is attempting to recruit at least 3,000 volunteers to fan out to "several thousand" hand-picked voting precincts around the country that he and his team have determined to have the highest risk of faulty results. But Stone is far from that goal with just 12 days until the election, having recruited 1,200 people.
[Trump poll-watching call lands RNC in court]
Trump poll-watching call lands RNC in court 18:43

Trump, who is down in most polls, has been hyping the possibility of a "rigged" election on the campaign trail for weeks now, saying that he might not accept the outcome should he lose.

Stone said that with his operation, he is planning to provide the evidence - or lack thereof - of any fishy voting results. He claims that if his exit polls are within a two percent margin of error of the certified results, then his opinion, the election can be trusted.

Related: Feds Concerned About Risk of Violence as Election Day Nears

Major media outlets also conduct exit polls through a consortium. Those are paper-and-pencil surveys that are randomly given to voters leaving their polling places. The national exit poll is conducted in 350 precincts across the country where 25,000 voters are interviewed.

When asked if there will be a difference between his exit poll and the media consortium, Stone said the "methodology will be the same."

While Trump has focused his complaints on the possibility of voter fraud, Stone said he is less concerned with fraud, which might change only a few votes, than the possible tampering of electronic voting machines, which he said could tip an election.

Stone is not a paid adviser to Trump, but he has been one of Trump's longest on-again and off-again confidantes. Throughout Trump's presidential campaign, Stone has warned of his concern over hacked voting machines, writing about the issue more than a year ago.

Stone told NBC News Tuesday that his exit poll operation is "a monumental undertaking" that has been in the works for "many, many months" and one that he is devoting all of his time to with days to go in the campaign. He said he will be training every volunteer to comply with electioneering and polling place laws in each of the states.

"I'm interested in interviewing voters to take a scientifically valid exit poll," he said.

Stone, prone to conspiracy theories, has a history in controversial elections. He played a role in the recount in Florida between Al Gore and George W. Bush by leading protestors to a Florida recount office, causing a stoppage in the process, a move that was widely viewed to have helped Bush.

Stone insists that he is not going to deploy election monitors, which critics fear will intimidate voters, insisting that what he is doing is "not poll watching, it's not voter intimidation. It's simply an exit poll."

"There's a distinct difference between poll watching and exit polling," Stone adds.

But election watchdogs are concerned with Stone's effort.

"The last time I checked, when you conduct an exit poll it has to be done in a neutral and scientific way that purports with scientific standards on the way you approach participants to the way you frame your questions," said Dale Ho, the director of the Voting Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union.
[Focus Group Demonstrates Little Confidence in Either Candidate]
Focus Group Demonstrates Little Confidence in Either Candidate 2:53

Stone insists that he will follow strict exit poll guidelines and has said in other interviews that while he doesn't yet have the questions determined, he has gathered a team of political scientists, IT people and "at least two pollsters" who are "putting on the finishing touches."

"You're asking a neutral questionnaire, you're not wearing a Donald Trump hat, you are making it clear that you are doing a privately exit poll and then you feed all that info into a computer and you compare it to the results immediately after the polls closed," is how Stone described the process to NBC News.

Still, Ho, says that exit polling is a complicated art.

"I don't know if there's some kind of hard and fast rule between the results of the exit poll and the official (election) results that mean the official results were flawed. It could be that the exit poll was flawed," Ho said.

Related: Hillary Clinton's Election Prize: Congressional Investigations

Stone told NBC News that he's recruiting "mostly online," and that recruitment extended to a right-wing internet talk show. Stone told Alex Jones of InfoWars Tuesday, who is a popular conspiracy theorist and Trump supporter who has espoused anti-Semitic and racially controversial comments, that, "we need an army of InfoWar warriors." Jones said he envisions a "massive, massive, massive landslide for Trump" on Election Day.

Stone won't detail yet where his volunteers will be stationed throughout the country. He denies that the racial makeup of the voters in a given location is a determining factor but that single-party dominance is, adding that problems tend to happen in areas where one party has control of the local government. On Jones' program, he mentioned that Clark County, Nevada, a battleground county that is home to Las Vegas, will have exit poll questioners.

He's directing people to the website Stop the Steal, which is run by the group Vote Protector. Interested volunteers must give their name, email addresses, state and congressional district to sign up. The volunteer is then guided on how to continue with the process. But Stone has less than 12 days to put it all together and has a long way to go to meet his goals.

Cebu_4_2
3rd November 2016, 03:05 PM
My god so tough to figure out how to do an exit poll... Smal 4" x 4" peices of paper with the presidential candidates and a box to check and then drop it in a box... Simply a paper ballot for those that choose to do so. No names and drop it in a box, no one knows who they picked. I would donate my time and paper to provide these in a scratch pad form...

ximmy
3rd November 2016, 04:03 PM
Lawsuits in 4 States Accuse Trump & GOP of Voter Intimidation November 3, 2016 (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/lawsuits-in-4-states-accuse-trump-gop-of-voter-intimidation_112016) | The Daily Sheeple | www.TheDailySheeple.com (http://www.thedailysheeple.com) | 545 views
According to four newly filed lawsuits in Arizona, Nevada, Ohio and Pennsylvania, GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump and the Republican Party are conspiring to intimidate and suppress minority voters.
Documents filed cite the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, which prohibit the intimidation and suppression of minority voters.
The GOP, Trump and Roger Stone are accused of “conspiring to threaten, intimidate, and thereby prevent minority voters in urban neighborhoods from voting in the 2016 election.”
Democrats are asking courts to declare the Republican “exit polling” and “citizen journalist” initiatives illegal as a relief for this alleged intimidation.
Could this merely be a publicity stunt to attempt to curb the election in Clinton’s favor?

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/lawsuits-in-4-states-accuse-trump-gop-of-voter-intimidation_112016

Cebu_4_2
3rd November 2016, 04:17 PM
Lawsuits in 4 States Accuse Trump & GOP of Voter Intimidation

November 3, 2016 (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/lawsuits-in-4-states-accuse-trump-gop-of-voter-intimidation_112016) | The Daily Sheeple | www.TheDailySheeple.com (http://www.thedailysheeple.com) | 545 views


According to four newly filed lawsuits in Arizona, Nevada, Ohio and Pennsylvania, GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump and the Republican Party are conspiring to intimidate and suppress minority voters.
Documents filed cite the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, which prohibit the intimidation and suppression of minority voters.
The GOP, Trump and Roger Stone are accused of “conspiring to threaten, intimidate, and thereby prevent minority voters in urban neighborhoods from voting in the 2016 election.”
Democrats are asking courts to declare the Republican “exit polling” and “citizen journalist” initiatives illegal as a relief for this alleged intimidation.
Could this merely be a publicity stunt to attempt to curb the election in Clinton’s favor?

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/lawsuits-in-4-states-accuse-trump-gop-of-voter-intimidation_112016


Grasping straws. I dont understand why they attempt these lawsuits when the machines are rigged. Any clue?