PDA

View Full Version : Election swap?



JohnQPublic
9th November 2016, 09:24 PM
I am noticing that CNN keeps flashing up Michigan Wisconsin Arizona and a few other state results. They look like they are still extremely close. Is there any chance for a surprise switch?

jbeck57143
9th November 2016, 09:40 PM
Here's what they are showing at:
http://www.cnn.com/election/results

vacuum
9th November 2016, 10:25 PM
Michigan and New Hampshire are both 0.2% within margin. Its a significant number, but could be recounted.

But everything else is basically 1% or more margin, which is a lock. Doesn't matter if we lose Michigan.

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president

vacuum
9th November 2016, 10:32 PM
One thing I found interesting is how effectively they took Nevada, Virginia, Colorado, and New Hampshire.

They rigged the election for sure. They just didn't even consider that they had to rig PA, MI, and WI. It was an oversight that cost them the election.

Trump barely won this. A huge number of delegates were within these tiny margins:



Michigan (http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president/michigan)
100%
Trump +0.2
Trump +0.3
92%




Wisconsin (http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president/wisconsin)
100%
Trump +0.9
Trump +0.9
✓ WON




Pennsylvania (http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president/pennsylvania)
>95%
Trump +1.1
Trump +1.0
✓ WON




Florida (http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president/florida)
100%
Trump +1.3
Trump +1.3
✓ WON

JohnQPublic
9th November 2016, 11:56 PM
Help Hillary email http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?93335-Help-Hillary-email

Glass
10th November 2016, 12:30 AM
@ vacuum seems some states have more delegates in them than dirt under them. Population based boundaries. I think they were relying on their gerrymandering of those population profiles. Perhaps they don't understand those profiles or they are not made up of the people they thought they were... or something else happened.
https://mishgea.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/geographic-landslide1.png
source linkages (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-10/trumps-geographic-landslide)

PatColo
10th November 2016, 03:26 AM
Michigan and New Hampshire are both 0.2% within margin. Its a significant number, but could be recounted.

But everything else is basically 1% or more margin, which is a lock. Doesn't matter if we lose Michigan.

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president

IIRC NH has (had?) A handful of counties which remained all hand count paper ballots. They became an issue in '08 when tptb robbed rpaul in the primaries, but these exact NH counties were sharply at odds & pro RP vs all the electronic voting counties in NH & elsewhere.

The Jsm blacked out this little 'tell'; it was only discussed in the alt media, never went anywhere; and RP the dinjoodeo-mason obediently laid low about being robbed.