View Full Version : Trump: I’m Reopening 9/11 Investigation
old steel
10th November 2016, 12:19 PM
Whoa, balls of steel!
http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Trump-reopening-911-investigation-650x350.jpg
Trump: I’m Reopening 9/11 Investigation
“First of all, the original 9/11 investigation is a total mess and has to be reopened," Trump said
Posted on November 10, 2016 by Baxter Dmitry (http://yournewswire.com/author/baxter/) in News (http://yournewswire.com/category/news/), US (http://yournewswire.com/category/news/us/) // 1 Comment (http://yournewswire.com/trump-im-reopening-911-investigation/#disqus_thread)
Donald Trump’s plans for his first 100 days in office are raising eyebrows around the world, but of all the items on his agenda it is the reopening of the 9/11 investigation that will provide the greatest earthquake for the establishment.
http://yournewswire.com/trump-im-reopening-911-investigation/
mamboni
10th November 2016, 12:21 PM
Let's see if he sticks to this AFTER meeting with Netanyahoo. Israeli Mossad fingerprints are all over 911.
ximmy
10th November 2016, 12:21 PM
This can't be real??
old steel
10th November 2016, 12:23 PM
I believe he mentioned this once before he was elected POTUS.
Spectrism
10th November 2016, 12:35 PM
i would like to see a reliable source on this. I can't imagine that he said it this week. While important, he has hundreds of other things pressing ahead of this.
old steel
10th November 2016, 12:43 PM
Al part of draining the swamp, this is a very deep part of the swamp.
cheka.
10th November 2016, 12:46 PM
hope he gets the import tariff in before messing with this....if true, this might be his last activity
cheka.
10th November 2016, 12:48 PM
from the op link:
The election of Donald Trump has rocked the establishment and things are only going to get rockier for them during his first term. There is a reason George W. Bush didn’t vote for Trump in the election, leaving the presidential line blank and voting Republican down-ballot. Trump has pledged to investigate 9/11 in a way it has not been investigated before.
For the first time 9/11 will be investigated by someone who isn’t part of the establishment, with skin in the game and plenty to lose.
“First of all, the original 9/11 investigation is a total mess and has to be reopened” Trump announced to supporters. “How do two planes take out three buildings in the same day? I never got my head around the fact that nothing is mentioned about the destruction of Building 7 in the 585 page document,” he explained, talking about World Trade Center 7 which also collapsed – inexplicably – during the September 11 attacks.
Donald Trump has also taken cracks at former president George W. Bush. There will be no covering up for former presidents on Trump’s watch.
“The World Trade Center came down during the reign of George Bush,” he said in a February debate. “He kept us safe? That is not safe. That is not safe.”
“Why did the administration at the time not take legal means against Saudi Arabia? Weren’t 19 of the high-jackers from Saudi Arabia? Americans deserve answers and I will definitely request a new investigation so that this horrible tragedy never happens again.”
Donald Trump and the 9/11 Truth movement
While Trump might be railing against the establishment in reopening the 9/11 investigation, he has received support on this issue from a number of public personalities who have demanded the case be revisited – and not behind closed doors.
Former Senator Bob Graham has been demanding a new, transparent investigation “For years I have been campaigning for the release of the 2002 Joint Congressional Intelligence Committee 9/11 Inquiry’s report, to no avail” explains the former Governor of Florida. “These missing pages point to the direct involvement of the government of Saudi Arabia. Why are these being kept secret? Who has to gain from these games of secrecy?” he asks.
“I have read these documents myself and if the American public knew what was in these documents, there would be a revolution tomorrow in the streets of America” he acknowledged during a radio interview. “Americans deserve to know the truth” he concluded, visibly angered by the whole affair.
Since 2002, the release of a number of 9/11 Commission Report documents is hindered because they are congressional records, hence they are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The long withheld 28 pages were partially released to the public this year – heavily redacted – and the Saudi government claimed the release proved they were not responsible for supporting or financing the attacks. But it’s not as simple as that. There are direct ties to the Saudi hierarchy in the 28 pages. There are a lot of questions that need answering, and they were never going to be addressed under a Clinton presidency with all her ties to Saudi Arabia.
But with President Trump’s executive powers, everything has changed. The establishment are on edge. More than half the country doesn’t believe the official version of what happened that day. There is now a renewed belief that this biggest of lies and cover ups is about to be dismantled.
The establishment did all it could to destroy Trump the outsider’s election chances at election. Now they are on edge.
cheka.
10th November 2016, 12:52 PM
http://damnleaks.com/if-elected-i-will-re-open-911-investigation-donald-trump/
RICHMOND, VA | Donald Trump, the GOP’s 2016 front-runner, brought his campaign to Henrico County on Wednesday night, where he made an unexpected statement after answering a series of questions from the crowd.
Pressed on the subject of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and what he would do to prevent such a thing from happening again, the presidential candidate known for his brash answers completely took his supporters by surprise.
donald-trump_3
“First of all, the original 9/11 investigation is a total mess and has to be reopened”
he told the crowd of supporters.
“How do two planes take out three buildings in the same day? I never got my head around the fact that nothing is mentioned about the destruction of Building 7 in the 585 page document”
he explained, talking about World Trade Center 7 which also collapsed during the September 11 attacks.
Cebu_4_2
10th November 2016, 12:54 PM
Wow.
C.Martel
10th November 2016, 01:43 PM
are they looking into this: Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD (http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=5367.0)
or is this a small play to the base (Les Deplorables)?
Santa
10th November 2016, 01:54 PM
I think he probably will reopen an investigation into 911, if only so that it could be used as a very powerful political weapon to be used in future deals with Saudi Arabia
and the mid east. Not to mention how good it would make him look in the public eye. Anything detrimental to national security or Izzy could easily be spun out of existence.
crimethink
10th November 2016, 01:56 PM
If he picks Rudy Giuliani for AG, this will go nowhere. It was Giuliani's OEM operations center on the 23rd floor of WTC 7 that was the command center for the remote control airstrikes on the Twin Towers.
osoab
10th November 2016, 02:00 PM
If he picks Rudy Giuliani for AG, this will go nowhere. It was Giuliani's OEM operations center on the 23rd floor of WTC 7 that was the command center for the remote control airstrikes on the Twin Towers.
????
crimethink
10th November 2016, 02:06 PM
????
You don't know about that? Before 9/11, NYC OEM needed a new operations center. Most recommended Staten Island. Giuliani overrode the recommendations and installed the operations center on the 23rd floor of World Trade Center 7 (the infamous "pull it" Salomon Brothers Building). Who in their right mind would install their emergency operations center right next to the premiere terrorist target on the planet?
The evidence for the Northwoods implementation and a whole shitload of financial funny business documentation was buried under a pile of rubble.
crimethink
10th November 2016, 02:13 PM
More on Giuliani and WTC 7:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/26/us/politics/26emergency.html
The New York Police Department produced a detailed analysis in 1998 opposing plans by the city to locate its emergency command center at the World Trade Center, but the Giuliani administration overrode those objections. The command center later collapsed from damage in the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.
“Seven World Trade Center is a poor choice for the site of a crucial command center for the top leadership of the City of New York,” a panel of police experts, which was aided by the Secret Service, concluded in a confidential Police Department memorandum.
The memorandum, which has not been previously disclosed, cited a number of “significant points of vulnerability.” Those included: the building’s public access, the center’s location on the 23rd floor, a 1,200-gallon diesel fuel supply for its generator, a large garage and delivery bays, the building’s history as a terrorist target, and its placement above and adjacent to a Consolidated Edison substation that provided much of the power for Lower Manhattan.
http://therealrudy.org/command.php
9-11 COMMISSION REPORT
From Chapter 9, Section 9.1:
"Some questioned locating it both so close to a previous terrorist target and on the 23rd floor of a building (difficult to access should elevators become inoperable). There was no backup site."
From Chapter 9, Section 9.2:
"After the South Tower was hit, OEM senior leadership decided to remain in its "bunker" [on the 23rd floor, LOL!] and continue operations, even though all civilians had been evacuated from 7 WTC. At approximately 9:30, a senior OEM official ordered the evacuation of the facility."
"First responders assisted thousands of civilians in evacuating the towers, even as incident commanders from responding agencies lacked knowledge of what other agencies and, in some cases, their own responders were doing."
"With better understanding of the resources already available, additional units might not have been dispatched to the South Tower at 9:37."
GRAND ILLUSION: THE UNTOLD STORY OF RUDY GIULIANI AND 9/11 (Amazon)
By Wayne Barrett & Dan Collins
Chapter 6, RUDY'S BUNKER, an exhaustively researched account of the planning, construction, destruction and consequences of the OEM Emergency Command Center in WTC-7.
mamboni
10th November 2016, 02:58 PM
The more I read of Trump utterances, the more he appears to be a product/exponent of the alt-right. I would bet money he reads Zerohedge and some other similar sites. He might have a sock puppet here?
Apparently, Trump hasn't yet had his private viewing of the [unedited] Zapruder film.
Cebu_4_2
10th November 2016, 03:14 PM
Apparently, Trump hasn't yet had his private viewing of the [unedited] Zapruder film.
I think he will abstain...
Glass
10th November 2016, 03:19 PM
Pretty sure he's a high level mason so, no. And with Giuliani as AG. No chance.
osoab
10th November 2016, 03:22 PM
Apparently, Trump hasn't yet had his private viewing of the [unedited] Zapruder film.
So Melania does it? Damned nefarious Russians.
osoab
10th November 2016, 03:24 PM
You don't know about that? Before 9/11, NYC OEM needed a new operations center. Most recommended Staten Island. Giuliani overrode the recommendations and installed the operations center on the 23rd floor of World Trade Center 7 (the infamous "pull it" Salomon Brothers Building). Who in their right mind would install their emergency operations center right next to the premiere terrorist target on the planet?
The evidence for the Northwoods implementation and a whole shitload of financial funny business documentation was buried under a pile of rubble.
Yes, and the large amount of fuel stored in the middle of the building.
I do not remember hearing of airstrikes on the TTs. Nukes in the basements.
midnight rambler
10th November 2016, 03:24 PM
Mazel tov!
Cebu_4_2
10th November 2016, 03:27 PM
Perhaps Giuliani will be an example and set a precident?
crimethink
10th November 2016, 03:36 PM
Yes, and the large amount of fuel stored in the middle of the building.
I do not remember hearing of airstrikes on the TTs. Nukes in the basements.
The two aircraft that hit the Towers were remote controlled USAF aircraft painted to look like American and United pssenger planes.
There were no nukes in the basement. Thermite on key support columns throughout the Towers. "Nukes in the basement" is a lunatic claim meant to discredit genuine 9/11 investigation.
singular_me
10th November 2016, 03:38 PM
very likely... I'd prefer him to tackle the shadow gov FIRST. reopening 911 is like placing the cart before the horse
I saw gulianni interviewed by the MSN supporting trump. LOL
America's Primal Scream, Listen to Us! David Icke Reacts to the US Election Result
we avoided the catastrophe... here comes the disaster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yR-tvxrDxA
Pretty sure he's a high level mason so, no. And with Giuliani as AG. No chance.
osoab
10th November 2016, 03:58 PM
The two aircraft that hit the Towers were remote controlled USAF aircraft painted to look like American and United pssenger planes.
There were no nukes in the basement. Thermite on key support columns throughout the Towers. "Nukes in the basement" is a lunatic claim meant to discredit genuine 9/11 investigation.
Ok, I wasn't thinking about the planes themselves. Duh. Nukes are very likely along with the thermite. They needed a lot of oomph to take them down. Do you think Rudy was duped into the placement? He could have been doing a favor for a friend.
WTC 7 also held Enron and Worldcom files.
old steel
10th November 2016, 04:55 PM
The two aircraft that hit the Towers were remote controlled USAF aircraft painted to look like American and United pssenger planes.
There were no nukes in the basement. Thermite on key support columns throughout the Towers. "Nukes in the basement" is a lunatic claim meant to discredit genuine 9/11 investigation.
Remember the small type piles of material left over from 1/4 mile of concrete/steel towers that reached into the sky.
A lot of material was simply vaporized, although thermite was used in the demolition, it can't do that.
Dogman
10th November 2016, 05:11 PM
Remember the small type piles of material left over from 1/4 mile of concrete/steel towers that reached into the sky.
A lot of material was simply vaporized, although thermite was used in the demolition, it can't do that.
Remember also those buildings were mostly air as most buildings are now as always, unless it is a bunker. Thin curtain wall with the concert core as the backbone!
Sorta think balloon inflated vs not, which has more volume?
Just saying!
;D
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Forum runner
cheka.
10th November 2016, 05:23 PM
seems bombs in the basement were proven.....what's this talk otherwise?
Dogman
10th November 2016, 05:25 PM
seems bombs in the basement were proven.....what's this talk otherwise?
Lmfao
Bottom up vs top down !
Wtc was a top down pancake !
;D
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Forum runner
mick silver
10th November 2016, 05:35 PM
i just hope trump can live that long , he may be playing a ace card who knows
madfranks
10th November 2016, 05:36 PM
If he does reopen it, I hope he realizes he's got thousands of architects and engineers on his side (including me).
ae911truth.org
crimethink
10th November 2016, 06:19 PM
They needed a lot of oomph to take them down.
Cut key supports, and the building comes down. The weight itself is sufficient. The pancaking started well above ground level.
Do you think Rudy was duped into the placement? He could have been doing a favor for a friend.
The preponderance of the evidence is that he was involved.
WTC 7 also held Enron and Worldcom files.
Yes, as I noted earlier.
crimethink
10th November 2016, 06:21 PM
Remember the small type piles of material left over from 1/4 mile of concrete/steel towers that reached into the sky.
A lot of material was simply vaporized, although thermite was used in the demolition, it can't do that.
Pulverized, not vaporized. Aerosolized debris. I've seen some theories about sonic weaponry used, but there simply was no Tritium or Transuranic elements from a nuclear detonation.
crimethink
10th November 2016, 06:24 PM
seems bombs in the basement were proven.....what's this talk otherwise?
Proven by whom? I want to see documented reports of Tritium and Transuranic elements present at the site or in the air, as always occur after a nuclear detonation. Nor was there any neutron radiation (picked up by NUDET satellites for treaty verification).
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 06:39 PM
Pulverized, not vaporized. Aerosolized debris. I've seen some theories about sonic weaponry used, but there simply was no Tritium or Transuranic elements from a nuclear detonation.
Nope steel was vaporized thermite and gravity cannot do that plus the tritium levels prove it was a nuclear event
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-15/one-man-asks-why-was-tritium-found-911-ground-zero
http://www.nucleardemolition.com/tritium.html
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/02/vt-nuclear-education-undeniable-proof-of-911-as-a-nuclear-event/
https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/07/02/hard-evidence-supports-the-hypothesis-that-mini-nukes-were-used-to-demolish-the-wtc-towers/ (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/02/vt-nuclear-education-undeniable-proof-of-911-as-a-nuclear-event/)
Or do you want CNN as a source?
crimethink
10th November 2016, 06:43 PM
Nope steel was vaporized thermite and gravity cannot do that plus the tritium levels prove it was a nuclear event
Credible citations, please.
NO Tritium present anywhere on 9/11-9/12.
vacuum
10th November 2016, 06:44 PM
This goes with my theory on Trump's relationship with Israel.
Yes, on the one hand Trump is going to support Israel, keep it safe, and give aid to it. But on the other hand, he's going to expect Israel to be our bitch and do what we want. If this investigation is re-opened, then that makes Saudi Arabia and Israel our bitches, because at any point the investigation could take a wrong turn if both of those countries don't do what we want them to do.
midnight rambler
10th November 2016, 06:44 PM
Not enough energy in thermite to create pools of molten steel that persist for four months despite the cold of winter and being doused non-stop with water.
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 06:49 PM
see above
also
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/02/08/rainbow-dark-powerful-proof-911-nukes/
Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:09 PM
see above
also
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/02/08/rainbow-dark-powerful-proof-911-nukes/
Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
"Courtesy of Veterans Today."
All garbage from the admitted liar Gordon Duff. No citations from the alleged USGS reports. Just spew.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZufw3G931Q
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:10 PM
Not enough energy in thermite to create pools of molten steel that persist for four months despite the cold of winter and being doused non-stop with water.
Why do people persist in adhering to this nonsense? There were no "molten pools" for four months.
Shami-Amourae
10th November 2016, 07:13 PM
https://s18.postimg.org/8pwsxpsc9/1473628478979.png
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 07:16 PM
Why do people persist in adhering to this nonsense? There were no "molten pools" for four months.
Hmm yes there were many and so now your questionablility of being an idiot or a plant comes to mind----- Good God
So Crime Think is a plant go figure this makes sense or he or she is an idiot
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 07:35 PM
So who is Crime Think, looks like a player but on the other side. Did not know perhaps not paying attention what ever is a plant
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:36 PM
Hmm yes there were many and so now your questionablility of being an idiot or a plant comes to mind----- Good God
So Crime Think is a plant go figure this makes sense or he or she is an idiot
It's clear that you are a shameless liar like your idol Gordon Duff. Peddling untenable bullshit as you do here serves only one end: to make serious and sincere investigation into what really happened on 9/11 have the appearance of being an enterprise only for kooks.
A nuclear detonation in the basement of WTC 1 (and 2?) would have resulted in the Towers angling over and coming down like fallen trees. This did not happen. Instead, they collapsed into their own footprints, which is consistent with conventional controlled demolition, and such controlled demolition demonstrably started well above ground floor. Was there a "nuke" under WTC 7, as well?
One or even two nuclear detonations would actually be far worse for my original contention: that Giuliani was "in on it." He would have been aware of it in advance, or, been aware of it afterwards, and has conspired to cover it up.
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:37 PM
So who is Crime Think, looks like a player but on the other side. Did not know perhaps not paying attention what ever is a plant
More importantly, who - or what - are you? Are you really this stupid, or are you a deliberate disinformation agent like Gordon Duff?
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 07:39 PM
More importantly, who - or what - are you? Are you really this stupid, or are you a deliberate disinformation agent like Gordon Duff?
So it was (Gravity) that did it LOL idiot
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:42 PM
So it was (Gravity) that did it LOL idiot
I apologize for your ignorance of science and engineering.
Hey, look! Another "nuclear detonation!" :rolleyes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqG6v7KZ_s8
(fucking retard)
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 07:46 PM
Why do people persist in adhering to this nonsense? There were no "molten pools" for four months.
you have outed yourself with this
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:46 PM
An "underground nuclear detonation" that starts dozen of stories above ground:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yli-if4F0DY
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:47 PM
you have outed yourself with this
You outed yourself as a fucking liar by endorsing Gordon Duff.
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 07:48 PM
I apologize for your ignorance of science and engineering.
Hey, look! Another "nuclear detonation!" :rolleyes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqG6v7KZ_s8
hmm so you can prove this is not a nuclear detonation
(fucking retard)
Hmmm so you know this was not a nuclear event? LOL
.......................................
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:49 PM
.......................................
Unable to refute obvious facts?
old steel
10th November 2016, 07:52 PM
Pulverized, not vaporized. Aerosolized debris. I've seen some theories about sonic weaponry used, but there simply was no Tritium or Transuranic elements from a nuclear detonation.
How do you explain all the power outages for blocks around "ground zero"?
Cell phone and other devices did not function. Why?
How do you explain all the vehicles in the area with one perfect side and the other side melted?
How to you explain windshields blown out, not in?
How do you explain engines blocks that melted?
How do you explain the free fall of skyscrapers around a central core with resistance at every floor all the way down?
crimethink
10th November 2016, 07:55 PM
How do you explain all the power outages for blocks around "ground zero"?
Cell phone and other devices did not function. Why?
How do you explain all the vehicles in the area with one perfect side and the other side melted?
How to you explain windshields blown out, not in?
How do you explain engines blocks that melted?
How do you explain the free fall of skyscrapers around a central core with resistance at every floor all the way down?
Citations, please. If you plan to cite Veterans Today, don't bother. Cite sources from people with IQs above 70 and an HQ (Honesty Quotient) above 10.
old steel
10th November 2016, 07:57 PM
Volcanoes in NYC, who would have thought?
http://www.drjudywood.com/home/bubbler.jpg
Nuclear detonation in Nevada desert
http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee261/FrankPilla/WTC%20Pics/Sedan_nuk_zpslvnrivev.jpg
ximmy
10th November 2016, 07:57 PM
The fact is the towers were demolished from preset explosives (nuclear and/or conventional) by a carefully engineered plan.
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 07:57 PM
Unable to refute obvious facts?
the site is not working duff is questionable but gives some good info sorry you are a plant, a disinfo agent do you dini that? You cannot
believe that the towers completely destroyed themselves by falling??
old steel
10th November 2016, 08:01 PM
Citations, please. If you plan to cite Veterans Today, don't bother. Cite sources from people with IQs above 70 and an HQ (Honesty Quotient) above 10.
I don't go there, you?
Do you have an idea about how many photos, information sites, interviews and youtube videos that have been wiped from the internet regarding 9/11 in the past 15 years?
You do a disservice to all those who have lost their lives regarding this event, which is still ongoing with the illegal wars still raging on this planet.
slvrbugjim
10th November 2016, 08:04 PM
The fact is the towers were demolished from preset explosives (nuclear and/or conventional) by a carefully engineered plan.
Hum and thanks
crimethink
10th November 2016, 08:04 PM
the site is not working duff is questionable but gives some good info sorry you are a plant, a disinfo agent do you dini that?
I kindly suggest you GFY. A kook calling me a "plant." LOL
vacuum
10th November 2016, 08:10 PM
Does anyone have another source for the article in the OP?
crimethink
10th November 2016, 08:13 PM
You do a disservice to all those who have lost their lives regarding this event
Look in the mirror. Spewing insane bullshit about "mini-nukes" makes educating others about what really happened that day all the more difficult.
crimethink
10th November 2016, 08:16 PM
Does anyone have another source for the article in the OP?
I can't find one. It appears to be Sorcha Faal type garbage. More about "Baxter Dmitry":
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1101225/pg1
old steel
10th November 2016, 08:18 PM
Look in the mirror. Spewing insane bullshit about "mini-nukes" makes educating others about what really happened that day all the more difficult.
Show where i mentioned "mini nukes"?
Still haven't answered any of my questions....
crimethink
10th November 2016, 08:21 PM
Show where i mentioned "mini nukes"?
Don't act like a Jew. Your questions were clearly implying the effects of a nuclear device (extreme heat, EMP, etc.).
Still haven't answered any of my questions....
Still haven't given me citations for what you claim.
"Citations, please. If you plan to cite Veterans Today, don't bother. Cite sources from people with IQs above 70 and an HQ (Honesty Quotient) above 10."
old steel
10th November 2016, 08:31 PM
Ok here is a question you should easily be able to handle.
Catherine Austin Fits who was assistant secretary of HUD under George H.W. Bush has stated in several of her youtube interview videos that people who ask too many questions regarding 9/11
and the bombing of the Federal building in Oklahoma City wind up dead.
Why?
ximmy
10th November 2016, 08:54 PM
Here is why Trump will reopen 911 investigations...
To implicate Saudis in 911...
They pluck with him...
He plucks back...
http://investmentwatchblog.com/saudi-butt-hurt-imposed-by-a-u-s-president-they-wont-be-able-to-buy/
http://www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/12111857_trump_vs_prince_talal-vi.jpg
http://www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CWOImroW4AAECji.png
SAUDI BUTT-HURT imposed by a U.S. President they won’t be able to buy
by IWB (http://investmentwatchblog.com/author/admin-2/) · November 10, 2016
by BNI (http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/11/10/saudi-butt-hurt-imposed-by-a-u-s-president-they-wont-be-able-to-buy/)
It isn’t that the Saudis are upset that their $25 million donation to the Clinton Foundation isn’t worth the paper the check was written on, it’s that they no longer will be able to influence Washington’s foreign policy, nor spread Islam into American schools by financing (along with Qatar) Common Core and giving schools free history textbooks filled with Islamic propaganda.
Must see viddy... shows the war between Trump and Saudi Prince
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex9ldUHSgjs
midnight rambler
10th November 2016, 09:24 PM
Why do people persist in adhering to this nonsense? There were no "molten pools" for four months.
No, you're mistaken. There was a professional firefighter's publication (bona fide, I checked it out at the time to make sure, I now wish I had captured a screen shot, obviously) whose online edition in February 2002 stated that the pools of molten steel were still persisting in early February '02. You can not deny that CLEARLY the pools of molten steel persisted until AT LEAST mid-November, SIXTY DAYS after the incident. If not then you apparently have a very selective memory and/or weren't paying attention at the time.* lol
*I will readily admit that I was sucked in to the notion of 'Arab cavemen did it!' up until mid-November when I finally was awakened to the bullshit with the reports of "pools molten steel STILL at ground zero"
hoarder
10th November 2016, 09:40 PM
I can't believe any of you are so gullible to assume that there is any sincerity to this proposed investigation. Trump is a Jew and the end result will prove it.
old steel
10th November 2016, 10:13 PM
Well, jmo but he has plenty on his plate already without opening that can of snakes but if anyone was going to do it he would be the one.
I'm sure there are people still out there like Phil Marshall who have a trail that leads to the culprits but are laying low under the radar to preserve their lives.
Neuro
10th November 2016, 11:06 PM
No, you're mistaken. There was a professional firefighter's publication (bona fide, I checked it out at the time to make sure, I now wish I had captured a screen shot, obviously) whose online edition in February 2002 stated that the pools of molten steel were still persisting in early February '02. You can not deny that CLEARLY the pools of molten steel persisted until AT LEAST mid-November, SIXTY DAYS after the incident. If not then you apparently have a very selective memory and/or weren't paying attention at the time.* lol
*I will readily admit that I was sucked in to the notion of 'Arab cavemen did it!' up until mid-November when I finally was awakened to the bullshit with the reports of "pools molten steel STILL at ground zero"
What generated the heat that kept metal liquid for such a long time? Is this something that commonly occurs with underground nuclear explosions? I never heard of it...
Horn
10th November 2016, 11:52 PM
hope he gets the import tariff in before messing with this....if true, this might be his last activity
That and $300 barrel of oil should start Congress on his impeachment hearings,
they'll have DHS doppleganger ready within 24 hours
crimethink
11th November 2016, 03:30 AM
What generated the heat that kept metal liquid for such a long time? Is this something that commonly occurs with underground nuclear explosions? I never heard of it...
It was a Quantum Force Anti-Matter Warhead recovered from the Roswell crash. The size of a wristwatch, dial-a-yield from 1 Kiloton up to 1 Teraton. The proof is the residue of Imbecilium-199 still present today.
crimethink
11th November 2016, 03:37 AM
Trump is a Jew
It serves no good purpose to make up shit like this.
singular_me
11th November 2016, 03:45 AM
addressing the consequences wont fix the game. when running, ron paul was a controlled opposition in my view, but he is absolutely right.
Trump should resist neocon & shadow gov’t influence to justify people’s hopes – Ron Paul to RT
https://www.rt.com/usa/366404-trump-ron-paul-crosstalk/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome
John Pilger: ‘The truth is… there was no one to vote for’ (Going Underground US election special)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1Ho8OrBzig
very likely... I'd prefer him to tackle the shadow gov FIRST. reopening 911 is like placing the cart before the horse
I saw gulianni interviewed by the MSN supporting trump. LOL
America's Primal Scream, Listen to Us! David Icke Reacts to the US Election Result
we avoided the catastrophe... here comes the disaster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yR-tvxrDxA
hoarder
11th November 2016, 06:10 AM
It serves no good purpose to make up shit like this.Watch where he takes you.
PatColo
11th November 2016, 07:23 AM
This thread is sooo... 2008!?! Thermite! Bombs! Nukes! Space beams! Shill! Agent!
Nothing about planes/no planes @ WTC yet? Pentagram??
Only thing that matters http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?23130-The-quot-Israel-did-9-11-quot-Thread
With DT's requisite sycophantism towards the kosher satanists,
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bHmINZRwiZU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHmINZRwiZU
and his now making noises about cabinet postions for neocon 911 perps like giuliani & john bolton (sec of state!?), any new 911 "investigation" will just be another sham designed to further enshrine the kosher (((scary moozlems did 911, and they wanna eat ur babies! :o))) mythology.
DT made a "Deal" to be selected POTUS over HRC (https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/10/president-donald-trump-the-art-of-the-deal), and I'm sure the satanists have nothing to worry about... in fact they're licking their chops about new wars for izzy. >:D
cheka.
11th November 2016, 08:02 AM
Watch where he takes you.
no doubt he will take good care of the ziobeast. best hope is that he/his will improve a few of the fringe issues
midnight rambler
11th November 2016, 09:12 AM
It was a Quantum Force Anti-Matter Warhead recovered from the Roswell crash. The size of a wristwatch, dial-a-yield from 1 Kiloton up to 1 Teraton. The proof is the residue of Imbecilium-199 still present today.
Thanks for providing further evidence you're batshit crazy delusional Fred.
Here's more:
O'Toole remembers in February seeing a crane lift a steel beam vertically from deep within the catacombs of Ground Zero. "It was dripping from the molten steel," he said.
http://fallenbrothers.com/community/showthread.php?2062-Recovery-worker-reflects-on-months-spent-at-Ground-Zero&p=2948
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQyIN6OTMyY
"...they encountered rivers of molten steel." http://nypost.com/2004/03/03/unflinching-look-among-the-ruins/
Still more:
Leslie Robertson, a member of the engineering firm that designed the World Trade Center, said 21 days after the attack: “When we were down at the B1 level, one of the firefighters said, ‘I think you’d be interested in this,’ and they pulled up a big block of concrete and there was a, like a little river of steel, flowing.” [34] (http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/#N_34)
Ron Burger, a public health advisor at the National Center for Environmental Health who arrived at Ground Zero September 12, 2001, said: “Feeling the heat, seeing the molten steel, the layers upon layers of ash, like lava, it reminded me of Mt. St. Helen’s and the thousands who fled that disaster.” [35] (http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/#N_35)
In late fall 2001, Dr. Alison Geyh of the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health reported: “Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding molten steel.” [36] (http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/#N_36)
Joe Allbaugh, the Director of FEMA, said in an October 2001 interview on CBS: “It’s just too hot for rescuers to get into [some] areas. So we do not know yet what’s in those areas, other than very hot, molten material.” [37] (http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/#N_37)
Dr. Keith Eaton reported in Structural Engineer: “They showed us many fascinating slides … ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster.”
Don Carson, a hazardous materials expert from the National Operating Engineers Union, said six weeks after 9/11: “There are pieces of steel being pulled out from as far as six stories underground that are still cherry red.” [38] (http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/#N_38)
Greg Fuchek, vice president of a company that supplied computer equipment used to identify human remains, reported that “sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel.” [39] (http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/#N_39)
Sarah Atlas, of New Jersey’s Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue, arrived at Ground Zero on September 11 and reported that “fires burned and molten steel flowed in the pile of ruins still settling beneath her feet.” [40] (http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/#N_40)
Tom Arterburn, writing in Waste Age, reported that the New York Department of Sanitation removed “everything from molten steel beams to human remains.” [41] (http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/#N_41)
Joshua01
11th November 2016, 09:21 AM
Watch where he takes you.
Seems like you need to find your safe place
8674
cheka.
11th November 2016, 09:23 AM
Lmfao
Bottom up vs top down !
Wtc was a top down pancake !
;D
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Forum runner
ya, at about the same time the planes hit, that pancake thing did a lot of damage at and below grade
video and firefighter testimony:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvUIQZ7t7Ak
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSGZYP--wz0
hoarder
11th November 2016, 09:28 AM
no doubt he will take good care of the ziobeast. best hope is that he/his will improve a few of the fringe issuesWhere has hope taken us in the past?
cheka.
11th November 2016, 09:41 AM
"this is it" -- another indication wtc 7 take down was well known to nyc.media
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_1jcjSnOCI
cheka.
11th November 2016, 09:44 AM
Where has hope taken us in the past?
it took us to the moon
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/image/ap11_lm_as11_40_5927.jpg
Cebu_4_2
11th November 2016, 09:49 AM
Does anyone have another source for the article in the OP?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Trump+Reopening+9%2F11+Investigation&ia=web
Hundreds of copy cats.
Joshua01
11th November 2016, 09:52 AM
it took us to the moon
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/image/ap11_lm_as11_40_5927.jpg
Prove it!
midnight rambler
11th November 2016, 09:53 AM
I like how it's so easy to put boot prints in the moon dirt/dust yet there's no evidence of the landing rockets firing.
it took us to the moon
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/image/ap11_lm_as11_40_5927.jpg
mamboni
11th November 2016, 09:55 AM
it took us to the moon
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/image/ap11_lm_as11_40_5927.jpgYou forgot /sarc.
I hope you can see that this photo proves that they did not go to the moon. For example, notice the pristine condition of the ground underneath the craft - not even a hint of a blast crater. There is no dust on the footers, not a speck. The construction of the module is remarkable: construction paper, screws, flimsy sheet metal etc. Notice all the gaps on the surface construction. So we are told that this craft flew 250,000 miles and withstood speeds of tens of thousands of miles per hour and extremes of heat and cold.
Does anyone really believe this is the moon? Please explain.
midnight rambler
11th November 2016, 09:57 AM
"this is it" -- another indication wtc 7 take down was well known to nyc.media
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_1jcjSnOCI
"We were told...it would be taken down."
Dayum, those demolition crews work pretty damn quickly!
hoarder
11th November 2016, 10:14 AM
it took us to the moonThat was hopium.
Horn
11th November 2016, 10:25 AM
awe geez, u know yur screwed when a reopening 911, thread turns into a faux moon landing thread.
PatColo
11th November 2016, 10:35 AM
Still listening but in the first 10 mins of this show DD & Angln raise the Trump 911 thing, then Anglin raises how this'll really nail down THE SAUDI connection, and further how that'll somehow tie it to izzy... !?!
Then DD says how the evidence of izzy FOREKNOWLEDGE is so strong... /facepalm
Then Anglin babbles about how joo-wise Trump is...
Couple pied pipers
David Duke Show 2016.11.11
Dr. David Duke and Andrew Red Pill and White Pill our People in an hour of ultimate Political Incorrectness! Edit: oops, DD just did it again in this show @ 38:20.
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2016/11/david-duke-show-20161111.html
Incidentally DD also routinely cites the Apollo HOAX when itemizing the "great accomplishments of Whites."
crimethink
11th November 2016, 11:14 AM
Watch where he takes you.
I've made very clear my belief he is a rabid Zionist. But claiming he is a Jew is foolish and very unproductive.
crimethink
11th November 2016, 11:16 AM
it took us to the moon
So NASA says.
crimethink
11th November 2016, 11:19 AM
Thanks for providing further evidence you're batshit crazy delusional Fred.
Here's more:
O'Toole remembers in February seeing a crane lift a steel beam vertically from deep within the catacombs of Ground Zero. "It was dripping from the molten steel," he said.
As Neuro said: "What generated the heat that kept metal liquid for such a long time? Is this something that commonly occurs with underground nuclear explosions? I never heard of it..."
Be very sure you're not suffering long-term radiation sickness due to contamination by Imbecilium-199.
midnight rambler
11th November 2016, 11:37 AM
As Neuro said: "What generated the heat that kept metal liquid for such a long time? Is this something that commonly occurs with underground nuclear explosions? I never heard of it..."
Be very sure you're not suffering long-term radiation sickness due to contamination by Imbecilium-199.
Are you shilling for the Chosenites Fred??
It was WIDELY reported in the joosmedia in the weeks after the event that there was pools of molten steel at ground zero, "hot enough to melt recovery workers' boots".
As for what caused those pools of molten steel I have no proof of anything...except that it was widely reported at the time*. Nukes? Directed energy? I dunno, but one thing for damn sure it wasn't a result of 'contents' fires belching black smoke (indicating incomplete combustion due to LOW temperatures, LOWER than the melting point of steel) OR thermite alone.
*it was in fact this reporting of 'pools of molten steel' persisting two whole months later that made me start to question *the official narrative*
hoarder
11th November 2016, 12:03 PM
I've made very clear my belief he is a rabid Zionist. But claiming he is a Jew is foolish and very unproductive.Why would Jews elect (via electronic voting) a goy who threatens to unravel years of their work? Why would a goy marry Jewesses? How could a goy capitalist make out so well economically in a country run by Jewish crony capitalists?
Trump is a Jew. You have been had. Get over it.
agnut
11th November 2016, 01:14 PM
THE BLIND MEN AND THE ELEPHANT
John Godfrey Saxe's ( 1816-1887) version of the famous Indian legend,
It was six men of Indostan
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind.
The First approach'd the Elephant,
And happening to fall
Against his broad and sturdy side,
At once began to bawl:
"God bless me! but the Elephant
Is very like a wall!"
The Second, feeling of the tusk,
Cried, -"Ho! what have we here
So very round and smooth and sharp?
To me 'tis mighty clear
This wonder of an Elephant
Is very like a spear!"
The Third approached the animal,
And happening to take
The squirming trunk within his hands,
Thus boldly up and spake:
"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant
Is very like a snake!"
The Fourth reached out his eager hand,
And felt about the knee.
"What most this wondrous beast is like
Is mighty plain," quoth he,
"'Tis clear enough the Elephant
Is very like a tree!"
The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
Said: "E'en the blindest man
Can tell what this resembles most;
Deny the fact who can,
This marvel of an Elephant
Is very like a fan!"
The Sixth no sooner had begun
About the beast to grope,
Then, seizing on the swinging tail
That fell within his scope,
"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant
Is very like a rope!"
And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!
MORAL.
So oft in theologic wars,
The disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean,
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!
Does anyone have a copy of “Where Did The Towers Go ?” by Dr. Judy Wood ? It is 500 pages long with hundreds of photos. This book focuses on evidence not conjectures. Without sufficient evidence, we are like The Six Blind Men And The Elephant.
This book is hardbound and written as a scientific textbook outlining why there is so much confusion as to what really occurred based on the evidence that we know AT THIS TIME. Dr. Judy Wood is driven to find out what really happened in her search for the “device” or whatever caused so many effects which do not make sense in light of historical evidence.
You can view her several Youtube videos and get an idea of the nature of her scientific search for the truth but unless you have her book you will never really know what happened. You will be astounded by the enormous quantity of events that occurred that do not make sense AT THIS TIME. This book is a scientific forensic investigation written by a PHD forensic engineer professor. Everyone should have a copy and having read it thoroughly before making statements as to what really happened. Only then can we proceed further regarding understanding the complete story of the who, what, when, why, where and how this American tragedy unfolded.
How many of you are aware that in addition to building one, two, and seven (which was not hit by an airplane and was “pulled” as stated before it fell) that buildings three, four, five and six were also hit and destroyed in a most curious fashion ? The overhead photos of all seven buildings destroyed is a mind blower. We patriotic Americans all owe it to ourselves and other Americans to buy this book in order to have an intelligent conversation based on SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE.
At this time there are several copies of Time magazine’s “Madam President” for sale on eBay for $500. What could we learn from that ?
However, we can instead buy “Where Did The Towers Go ?” for one tenth the price at $50. The choice is yours.
Best wishes,
Agnut
"To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; to earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; to appreciate beauty, to find the best in others; to leave the world a little better; whether by a healthy child, a garden patch or a redeemed social condition; to know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is the meaning of success. "
Ralph Waldo Emerson
“You don’t have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body.
C.S. Lewis
Joshua01
11th November 2016, 01:16 PM
Why would Jews elect (via electronic voting) a goy who threatens to unravel years of their work? Why would a goy marry Jewesses? How could a goy capitalist make out so well economically in a country run by Jewish crony capitalists?
Trump is a Jew. You have been had. Get over it.
http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/f3/f3cda169dc51044fe43cc70c9d86c188e886b1f3bdca0bcc95 c4529d3b228f15.jpg
8676
crimethink
11th November 2016, 01:21 PM
Are you shilling for the Chosenites Fred??
I am only interested in the Truth. The Skypes hate the Truth. Pushing ridiculous shit like "nuclear detonations" (or worse, exotic weapons beyond that) does not serve the Truth. Such untenable claims fall in the same category as pushing the nonsense that an A-rab with a few hours of flight training flew a jetliner like a Top Gun fighter into the Pentagram.
crimethink
11th November 2016, 01:22 PM
Why would Jews elect (via electronic voting) a goy who threatens to unravel years of their work? Why would a goy marry Jewesses? How could a goy capitalist make out so well economically in a country run by Jewish crony capitalists?
Trump is a Jew. You have been had. Get over it.
Trump is a Shabbos Goy. I know you understand the concept. He's an eager Shabbos Goy, too. But that doesn't mean he's literally a Jew.
I wasn't "had." If you were paying attention, you'd know I didn't vote for him.
midnight rambler
11th November 2016, 01:24 PM
Fred, there WERE "pools of molten steel" at WTC 'ground zero' which persisted for MONTHS, and this situation wasn't caused by some thermite. Deal with it.
crimethink
11th November 2016, 01:25 PM
Fred, there WERE "pools of molten steel" at WTC 'ground zero' which persisted for MONTHS, and this situation wasn't caused by some thermite. Deal with it.
No, there weren't. Deal with it.
Horn
11th November 2016, 02:10 PM
I dont think it actually matters how a controlled demolition goes down, there are any number of methods.
One could be electing a man of the people then watching him turn into Jimmy Carter...
C.Martel
11th November 2016, 02:17 PM
Trump is a Shabbos Goy. I know you understand the concept. He's an eager Shabbos Goy, too. But that doesn't mean he's literally a Jew.
I wasn't "had." If you were paying attention, you'd know I didn't vote for him.
Atleast Trump's grandchildren are Christian, right? :|~
Nope, three of Trump's grandchildren are Jewish, dual-citizens and I doubt the rest aren't kosher certified.
cheka.
11th November 2016, 02:44 PM
You forgot /sarc.
I hope you can see that this photo proves that they did not go to the moon. For example, notice the pristine condition of the ground underneath the craft - not even a hint of a blast crater. There is no dust on the footers, not a speck. The construction of the module is remarkable: construction paper, screws, flimsy sheet metal etc. Notice all the gaps on the surface construction. So we are told that this craft flew 250,000 miles and withstood speeds of tens of thousands of miles per hour and extremes of heat and cold.
Does anyone really believe this is the moon? Please explain.
damn thing looks ridiculous. it's a shame that nasa is unable to repeat their moon landing today
C.Martel
11th November 2016, 03:02 PM
damn thing looks ridiculous. it's a shame that nasa is unable to repeat their moon landing today
What happens if you put a demon in space?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-107
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
Both Space Shuttle orbiter disasters, had demons on board.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_astronauts
God does not approve of demons in space.
PatColo
11th November 2016, 03:21 PM
Fun 911 facts, re Mike ANTHRAX=IRAQ Pence
Donald Trump's running mate once peddled conspiracy theories about anthrax and Saddam Hussein
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pence-anthrax-20160717-20160715-snap-story.html
In Trump White House, Will Mike Pence Become the Most Powerful Vice President in History?
Democracy Now! 11,703 views
15m
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rrAE-kP0vME
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrAE-kP0vME
hoarder
11th November 2016, 04:09 PM
Trump is a Shabbos Goy. I know you understand the concept. He's an eager Shabbos Goy, too. But that doesn't mean he's literally a Jew.
I wasn't "had." If you were paying attention, you'd know I didn't vote for him.A lot of Marranos get labeled Shabbos Goy, but it would be much too risky to have a real Shabbos Goy in the White House, especially one who talks building a wall and "investigating" 9-11. With the power of the electronic vote, there's no way they would take the chance.
How many Shabbos Goys actually marry Jewesses?
It is expedient for a Marrano to have himself labeled Shabbos Goy because the angry goyim will blame and hate their own kind instead of the Khazar.
They are actors. They love playing roles. They're very good at it.
But they're still Jews.
Horn
11th November 2016, 05:09 PM
Fun 911 facts,
In Trump White House, Will Mike Pence Become the Most Powerful Vice President in History?
Democracy Now! 11,703 views
15m
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rrAE-kP0vME
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrAE-kP0vME
Pat's got some cahones pasting that leftist bologna here...I'm not sure there were an unhyphenated american in that discussion. It were like a seperatista buffet.
I think Pence might have as much impact in the shadow of Trump as a single ant on a rubber tree plant.
Glass
11th November 2016, 05:10 PM
not sure if anyone has posted this yet. Just saw it. Haven't watched the 2 videos.
Newt Gingrich: Donald Trump "Drives The Establishment Crazy, He's Uncontrollable & Was Not In The Secret Society"
Back in March of this year during the Republican primary, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich was on Fox News explaining why the Republican establishment can not stand Donald Trump and was scared to death of a potential Trump presidency.
Newt began "Now they're faced with the prospect of Donald Trump becoming the leader of the party and it absolutely drives them crazy. Uh, they just cannot imagine sharing-
"Why?" The host asks, to which Newt replies
"Well because he's an outsider, he's not them, he's not part of the club. He's uncontrollable. Uh, you know, he hasn't been through the initiation rites. He didn't belong to the secret society. And I think they don't see him- they have NO IDEA how to relate to him."
. You Can watch the video below. As an interesting side note, in 2010 this writer asked Newt Gingrich about his own involvement in secret societies, Bohemian Grove, freemasonry, as well as his thoughts about world government and his opinon of Ron Paul. You can watch that video below also.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO-NA73FsW8
Full story of my encounter with Newt is here:http://libertyfight.com/newt.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbLe03HRDKI
libertyfight.com
(http://libertyfight.com/2016/Newt-Trump-secret-society.html)
I've said that I thought he was a Mason. So is he?
midnight rambler
11th November 2016, 05:23 PM
No, there weren't. Deal with it.
See? You ARE shilling for the Chosenites by trying to subvert historical fact.
I remember VERY CLEARLY as if it were yesterday hearing about the "pools of molten steel" persisting into mid-November reported by the joosmedia (the recollection is so vivid and the moment so striking I can tell you when and where I was at the time I had that epiphany) because this was the precise moment that I began questioning the official narrative. Yes, I do admit I got sucked into believing the lie about "A-rab cavemen did the deed!"...for about two whole months, i.e. until the reports started coming out about "the pools of molten steel at ground zero." My reaction was, "Wait a minute, there's NO FUCKING WAY that there'd be 'pools of molten steel' persisting for TWO WHOLE FUCKING MONTHS according the official narrative!"
Fred, you've apparently been sucked in to an aspect of the official narrative, admit it.
aeondaze
11th November 2016, 06:56 PM
Look guys, I know everyone has their pet theories as to how buildings came down. The truth is ALL of that evidence was destroyed years ago, shipped off to China and sold back to you as autos, filling cabinets and barbecues.
There is no use flogging a dead horse in this repect, you all agree that it was an inside job, don't let the details of how the buildings came down detract from the message or examination of other more fruitful evidence like what really happened at the Pentagon, who ordered Norad to stand down, the chain of command that day and all the correspondance which should still exist including the interwiews of Bush, Cheny and Rumsfeld. Not to forget the company that held the contract for security at Newark airport.
There is a trail of evidence a mile wide here, the physical evidence from the towers and building 7 are long gone and only serve to distract from the evidence that we can garner, its right under our noses and they know it, thats why there is a gigantic wall of obstruction and obfuscation around the actual details of that day.
crimethink
11th November 2016, 06:59 PM
See? You ARE shilling for the Chosenites by trying to subvert historical fact.
I remember VERY CLEARLY as if it were yesterday hearing about the "pools of molten steel" persisting into mid-November reported by the joosmedia (the recollection is so vivid and the moment so striking I can tell you when and where I was at the time I had that epiphany) because this was the precise moment that I began questioning the official narrative. Yes, I do admit I got sucked into believing the lie about "A-rab cavemen did the deed!"...for about two whole months, i.e. until the reports started coming out about "the pools of molten steel at ground zero." My reaction was, "Wait a minute, there's NO FUCKING WAY that there'd be 'pools of molten steel' persisting for TWO WHOLE FUCKING MONTHS according the official narrative!"
Fred, you've apparently been sucked in to an aspect of the official narrative, admit it.
"Eyewitness accounts" can be dismissed when they are clearly inaccurate, insane, or utterly dishonest. And you know as I do that "eyewitnesses" always vary in what they see and report.
I can give you a hundred "eyewitnesses" that "saw" homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and even Dachau. I can give you a dozen "eyewitness" accounts of passing through the Van Allen Belts with no harm.
The "eyewitnesses" claiming to have seen "molten metal" for "months" at the WTC claim something so incredible that they may - and must - be dismissed absent rational explanation. I have already applied reason - conclusion: no nukes - and hence, I dismiss their claims. And again, as Neuro pointed out, no nuclear detonation causes "molten metal" for "months."
old steel
11th November 2016, 07:35 PM
Oh FFS look, it was run by the Zionists for the benefit of Israel or WTF are you doing here?
The dancing Israelis were a dead giveaway from day one.
Poof gone.
http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/ad193/mcnooj82/BrianCox12.gif
crimethink
11th November 2016, 11:16 PM
Oh FFS look, it was run by the Zionists for the benefit of Israel or WTF are you doing here?
I'm sorry that decades of Talmudvision and Ed-Jew-cation have rendered your ability to discern facts from fiction crippled.
You look like a fool pushing every insane theory and angle, right along with the facts and probabilities that are beyond a reasonable doubt.
FACT: the three buildings did not "naturally" come down from jet fuel fires.
NOT FACT: the three buildings did not come down due to "mini-nukes" or ray guns.
FACT: the three buildings clearly collapsed due to deliberate compromise of their supporting structures.
NOT FACT: the three buildings did not topple over from fission/fusion explosions in their basements.
Read and re-read that until you "get" it.
Neuro
11th November 2016, 11:24 PM
"Eyewitness accounts" can be dismissed when they are clearly inaccurate, insane, or utterly dishonest. And you know as I do that "eyewitnesses" always vary in what they see and report.
I can give you a hundred "eyewitnesses" that "saw" homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and even Dachau. I can give you a dozen "eyewitness" accounts of passing through the Van Allen Belts with no harm.
The "eyewitnesses" claiming to have seen "molten metal" for "months" at the WTC claim something so incredible that they may - and must - be dismissed absent rational explanation. I have already applied reason - conclusion: no nukes - and hence, I dismiss their claims. And again, as Neuro pointed out, no nuclear detonation causes "molten metal" for "months."
I suppose it is possible unignited thermite on steel beams may create molten steel, when the bulldozers or cranes moves stuff around at ground zero or when they were cutting the beams hot melt ignited the thermite...
old steel
12th November 2016, 09:54 AM
No crimethink, you keep reading till you get it.
All these power people connected to 9/11 have one thing in common, wonder what that is?
http://whale.to/b/israel_did_911.html
old steel
12th November 2016, 01:23 PM
Excellent analysis and proof of underground nuclear detonation on 9/11.
http://www.academia.edu/8679047/9-11_An_Analysis_of_the_US_Geological_Survey_Data_-_Ground_Zero-The_Nuclear_Destruction_of_the_WTC_-_William_Tahil
9-11 Debris
An investigation of ground zero.
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/pdf/9-11_Debris_An_Investigation_of_Ground_Zero_by_Matt_ Nelson.pdf
crimethink
12th November 2016, 01:36 PM
No crimethink, you keep reading till you get it.
All these power people connected to 9/11 have one thing in common, wonder what that is?
http://whale.to/b/israel_did_911.html
I don't know if you are senile or just stupid, but I've never denied the role of the Mossad in 9/11.
We were discussing the imbecility of "mini nukes" bringing the three buildings down.
crimethink
12th November 2016, 01:49 PM
Excellent analysis and proof of underground nuclear detonation on 9/11.
http://www.academia.edu/8679047/9-11_An_Analysis_of_the_US_Geological_Survey_Data_-_Ground_Zero-The_Nuclear_Destruction_of_the_WTC_-_William_Tahil
I'm completely unimpressed. He cites outfits like "American Free Press" and "Libertypost.org" as "sources."
I did a search on "tritium" in that paper. Not a single hit. The author is clearly incompetent (or a deliberate liar like Gordon Duff) to ignore the key tracer of nuclear detonations or criticality accidents. But then, he actually goes to another idiotic extreme: "So far we have presented extensive forensic evidence that clandestine nuclear reactors were installed under the WTC." Not even "mini-nukes," but now "reactors"! He concludes, "This report has presented indisputable and overwhelming evidence that the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre were destroyed by the explosion and core meltdown of at least two nuclear reactors."
The guy has a Bachelor of Arts, and nothing more. Not even a Bachelor of Science. I have more academic training than he does. I wouldn't even cite "B.A." after my name, but he did. He is a borderline idiot savant, who fails to understand a "China Syndrome" has no relevance to the collapse of the Towers, yet he goes on and on regarding that. My understanding of nuclear physics, self-taught, exceeds his since I was 16. He completely fails to understand nuclear reactors do not explode like nuclear weapons, no matter how serious the accident or even deliberate prompt criticality event.
The paper is meaningless and impotent, and proves nothing. Lots of words but nothing said.
Any fucktard who calls me a "fool" or a "shill" is welcome to put down $400 and buy this high-quality Geiger Counter, and get their ass to New York City and document the alleged fission products which must still be there...if your theory is true.
https://medcom.com/product/rad-100/
old steel
12th November 2016, 03:12 PM
You need to open a speed reader school you would make a fortune. Don't know anyone else who could read that article in mere minutes.
You can lead a horse to water...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvGFVeGL9Aw
crimethink
12th November 2016, 03:25 PM
You need to open a speed reader school you would make a fortune. Don't know anyone else who could read that article in mere minutes.
I'm sorry my cognitive abilities leave you in awe.
You can lead a horse to water...
You can lead a jackass to the facts, but he may still kick you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvGFVeGL9Aw
You have yet to explain how an underground nuclear explosion caused the building to begin to collapse dozens of floors above ground. Start with that very, very simple issue.
LOL at the fucktard in the video talking about an "anti-matter" weapon.
old steel
12th November 2016, 03:49 PM
http://www.librariansfor911truth.org/images/Several%20burnt%20cars%20near%20parking%20garage.j pg
Oh shit look at all the burned vehicles blocks away from "ground zero" yet the tree remains untouched?
http://www.librariansfor911truth.org/images/Burnt%20bus%20near%20building%20with%2030%20on%20i t%20-%20front.jpg
Door handles gone, did somebody steal them?
http://www.librariansfor911truth.org/carfires.html
old steel
12th November 2016, 03:54 PM
Footage taken across from the World Trade Center showing cars on fire and smoke from the basement prior to the collapse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2GYHvstFpQ
crimethink
12th November 2016, 04:55 PM
Oh shit look at all the burned vehicles blocks away from "ground zero" yet the tree remains untouched?
Care to explain what sort of "nuclear weapon" destroys machines and leaves trees standing?
Joshua01
12th November 2016, 05:13 PM
I disagree with you. Trump chose pence for this exact purpose. Trump is an executive decision maker based on information and data he can highly depend on. He will run this country like he runs his businesses. By that I mean he'll let the people below him do their jobs and he will make, and take responsibility for, the decisions based on the information and work of the people who serve the president
Horn
13th November 2016, 09:11 AM
I disagree with you. Trump chose pence for this exact purpose. Trump is an executive decision maker based on information and data he can highly depend on. He will run this country like he runs his businesses. By that I mean he'll let the people below him do their jobs and he will make, and take responsibility for, the decisions based on the information and work of the people who serve the president
Any business type operation would not dwell on past mistakes, infact they work to bury the present ones in most cases.
U.S. may need some business like aproach to its budget, anything else needs to be approached like a doctor might. A hospital as a business model is not a very excellent case.
monty
14th July 2017, 08:21 AM
Man on deathbed admits 9/11 involvement. CIA Agent on deathbed confesses: We blew up WTC7 on 9/11
From YourNewsWire.com same source a lot of Dave Hodges reports come from. Take with a grain of salt
http://youtu.be/tyy4LfSWbfY
https://youtu.be/tyy4LfSWbfY
Joshua01
14th July 2017, 08:42 AM
Talk is cheap!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.