View Full Version : Computer can determine who is criminal from photo...
Neuro
26th November 2016, 10:50 AM
Chinese research shows this...
Return of physiognomy? Facial recognition study says it can identify criminals from looks alone
https://www.rt.com/news/368307-facial-recognition-criminal-china/
Two western scientists objected.
I think people who trust their instincts instead of their brainwashing (don't judge on looks, everyone is equal), would do even better than the computer (~90% correct).
osoab
26th November 2016, 10:59 AM
criminals of what?
Neuro
26th November 2016, 11:11 AM
criminals of what?
Convicted criminals... Just had this thought... Computer got 90% correct, perhaps it was close to 100% correct? Some innocents convicted, some unconvicted criminals in general public...
singular_me
26th November 2016, 12:10 PM
with AI st to be replacing judges, that's very convenient...
crimethink
26th November 2016, 03:34 PM
We know that computers are very accurate in unbiased assessment of facial characteristics:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/01/google-apologizes-after-photos-identify-black-people-as-gorillas/29567465/
http://www.trendsflash.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/google-gorillas.jpg
crimethink
26th November 2016, 03:39 PM
criminals of what?
The computers only do what is programmed. So, under the Chinese, it will look for two types: common criminals (killers, rapists, thieves, etc.), and, "politically undesirable" individuals (people who display the facecrime of being "excessively" freedom-minded, etc.).
America, of course, can adapt this technology. After programming the computers to comply with "civil rights" statutes (i.e., excluding "disadvantaged minorities"), they will identify financial criminals, "hate" criminals, and "terrorists" (anyone who doesn't slobberingly accept government as unquestionable).
Neuro
26th November 2016, 05:01 PM
with AI st to be replacing judges, that's very convenient...
Could AI be programmed with a Jew bias? Otherwise AI will never be replacing judges!
Cebu_4_2
26th November 2016, 05:07 PM
We know that computers are very accurate in unbiased assessment of facial characteristics:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/01/google-apologizes-after-photos-identify-black-people-as-gorillas/29567465/
http://www.trendsflash.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/google-gorillas.jpg
I remember that gorilla search and I tried it. It worked for exactly as posted in the picture. Was spectacularly funny, sent the link and article to everyone I know.
Shami-Amourae
26th November 2016, 05:31 PM
https://s16.postimg.org/kw7x3siz9/1473396868359.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/rmoed864x/)
https://s16.postimg.org/uuxh40hsl/e6bf511dcb4fcf8c4e897d5ebb3efadd7c15857a51415acd.p ng (https://postimg.org/image/n26tc1btd/)
cheka.
26th November 2016, 06:15 PM
skin color + age + neck tat + other tat + wardrobe + rims on vehicle + syntax = i beat your puter in speed and accuracy
C.Martel
27th November 2016, 02:49 PM
Computers can have jewdar?
crimethink
27th November 2016, 11:34 PM
Computers can have jewdar?
If they are programmed to analyze for beady-eyed, hook-nosed, rat-faced gangsters, yes.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.