View Full Version : On Tenderfeet and Greenhorns
ximmy
6th December 2016, 12:45 PM
A Tenderfoot can never survive outside of a city. Where foods are available at the general store, where a blacksmith is handy.
ON TENDERFEET
The tenderfoot is a queer beast. He makes more trouble than ants at a picnic, more work than a trespassing goat; he never sees anything, knows where anything is, remembers accurately your instructions, follows them if remembered, or is able to handle without awkwardness his large and pathetic hands and feet; he is always lost, always falling off or into things, always in difficulties; his articles of necessity are constantly being burned up or washed away or mislaid; he looks at you beamingly through great innocent eyes in the most chuckle-headed of manners; he exasperates you to within an inch of explosion,--and yet you love him.
I am referring now to the real tenderfoot, the fellow who cannot learn, who is incapable ever of adjusting himself to the demands of the wild life. Sometimes a man is merely green, inexperienced. But give him a chance and he soon picks up the game. That is your greenhorn, not your tenderfoot.
From The Mountains by Stewart Edward White
crimethink
6th December 2016, 02:06 PM
https://www.amazon.com/Spinster-Making-Life-Ones-Own/dp/0385347154
“Whom to marry, and when will it happen—these two questions define every woman’s existence.”
So begins Spinster, a revelatory and slyly erudite look at the pleasures and possibilities of remaining single. Using her own experiences as a starting point, journalist and cultural critic (((Kate Bolick))) invites us into her carefully considered, passionately lived life, weaving together the past and present to examine why* she—along with over 100 million American women, whose ranks keep growing—remains unmarried.
This unprecedented demographic shift, Bolick explains, is the logical outcome of hundreds of years of change that has neither been fully understood, nor appreciated. Spinster introduces a cast of pioneering women from the last century whose genius, tenacity, and flair for drama have emboldened Bolick to fashion her life on her own terms: columnist Neith Boyce, essayist Maeve Brennan, social visionary Charlotte Perkins Gilman, poet Edna St. Vincent Millay, and novelist Edith Wharton. By animating their unconventional ideas and choices, Bolick shows us that contemporary debates about settling down, and having it all, are timeless—the crucible upon which all thoughtful women have tried for centuries to forge a good life.
Intellectually substantial and deeply personal, Spinster is both an unreservedly inquisitive memoir and a broader cultural exploration that asks us to acknowledge the opportunities within ourselves to live authentically. Bolick offers us a way back into our own lives—a chance to see those splendid years when we were young and unencumbered, or middle-aged and finally left to our own devices, for what they really are: unbounded and our own to savor.
ximmy
6th December 2016, 02:15 PM
He was born on a summer day, 1951
And with the slap of a hand
He had landed as an only son
His mother and father said "what a lovely boy"
We'll teach him what we learned
Ah yes, just what we learned
We'll dress him up warmly and
We'll send him to school
It'll teach him how to fight
To be nobody's fool
Oh, oh, what a lonely boy
Oh, what a lonely boy
Oh, what a lonely boy
In the summer of '53 his mother
Brought him a sister
But she told him "we must attend to her needs"
"She's so much younger than you"
Well, he ran down the hall and he cried
Oh, how could his parents have lied
When they said he was an only son
He thought he was the only one
Oh, oh, what a lonely boy
Oh, what a lonely boy
Oh, what a lonely boy
He left home on a winter day, 1969
And he hoped to find all the love
He had lost in that earlier time
Well, his sister grew up
And she married a man
He gave her a son
Ah yes, a lovely son
They dressed him up warmly
They sent him to school
It taught him how to fight
To be nobody's fool
Oh, oh, what a lonely boy
Oh, what a lonely boy
Oh, what a lonely boy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kbgjmmr5vw
palani
6th December 2016, 02:16 PM
You sure you aren't discussing Greenfeet and Tenderhornes?
crimethink
6th December 2016, 02:18 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kbgjmmr5vw
(((Andrew Gold))), LOL.
ximmy
6th December 2016, 02:20 PM
You sure you aren't discussing Greenfeet and Tenderhornes?
Tenderfeet don't know that they are...
Cebu_4_2
6th December 2016, 02:44 PM
A Tenderfoot can never survive outside of a city. Where foods are available at the general store, where a blacksmith is handy.
Sounds like a lot like Jews.
ximmy
6th December 2016, 03:02 PM
Sounds like a lot like Jews.
Yes, and Tenderfeet have the baser qualities of lesser men. These include all forms of unbridled passions, sexual urges and feelings of loneliness... They are the fruition of an unchecked and unexamined life. A pitiful creature indeed.
Horn
6th December 2016, 03:20 PM
Yes, and Tenderfeet have the baser qualities of lesser men. These include all forms of unbridled passions, sexual urges and feelings of loneliness... They are the fruition of an unchecked and unexamined life. A pitiful creature indeed.
It sounds as if you have firsthand knowledge with tenderfeet.
Dogman
6th December 2016, 03:33 PM
It sounds as if you have firsthand knowledge with tenderfeet.
Pedicures !
;D
ximmy
6th December 2016, 03:59 PM
Now, let us examine a tenderfoot in detail. We will use Crimethink as an example.
Crimethink believes himself insightful, with the ability to see into others in a way they cannot see into themselves.
Crimethink suffers from the base "unchecked" passions inside himself. He cannot reasonably grasp the true nature of a person because his life remains unchecked.
Because his body is sexually frustrated, he supposes others to be this way also, this is how he sees the world.
Ximmy has repeatedly expressed her admiration for Trump, but Crimethink supposes there must be a sexual connotation.
This is a fine example of crimethink's limited baser thinking. The passionate thinking of a tenderfoot.
Says the one who fantasizes routinely about being "grabbed in the pussy" by her god-king.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?93808-This-is-CNN&p=873080&viewfull=1#post873080
(http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?93808-This-is-CNN&p=873080&viewfull=1#post873080)
and
I'm not the one who asks Trump to "give it to me" good and hard. You do.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?93808-This-is-CNN&p=873422&viewfull=1#post873422
Not content to suffer sexual transference from his own passion and placing it on ximmy.
Crimethink also insinuates ximmy has greater-than-admiration for Trump, it must be divine worship.
This is how a tenderfoot mind works, or better said, does not work properly. Crimethinks passions cannot comprehend a genuine admiration, it must include worship.
Fact #2) ximmy (and you) have routinely made statements of reverence, even worship, of Donald Trump.
Your statement about "YOUR god Hillary" is more than idiotic; it's deranged. The converse, asserting ximmy (or you) view Trump as a god-king, is a reasonable assessment based on your repeated expressions of blind support, arguably even fanaticism.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?93808-This-is-CNN&p=873287&viewfull=1#post873287
Crimethink is one sick tenderfoot. His baser passions include many more troubling vices. But the most sorrowful one might be loneliness... if he is lonely everyone else must be too.
Again this transference is directed at ximmy. Because crimethink is lonely, ximmy must be too. Crimethink imagines that ximmy, being unmarried, mandates her to loneliness or even to loser status...
i
What's so sad is that you have a celebrity as your virtual boyfriend. It's very telling you're not married at your age.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?93808-This-is-CNN&p=873519&viewfull=1#post873519
Married or unmarried, could crimethink himself be a sad loser? Is this why he imagines ximmy to be unmarried or sad?
This gives us much to think about and is a helpful detailed analysis of a tenderfoot among us.
crimethink
6th December 2016, 04:30 PM
Yes, and Tenderfeet have the baser qualities of lesser men. These include all forms of unbridled passions, sexual urges and feelings of loneliness... They are the fruition of an unchecked and unexamined life. A pitiful creature indeed.
You are an unmarried woman who has ten potential suitors of the highest quality for every one of you. So, what's the problem? Am I right that you are Miss Wrong? As a "liberated" female who prefers the Spinster Life, the available evidence indicates you are a female "Tenderfoot."
Tenderfoot = hipster, yuppie, etc. You.
Horn
6th December 2016, 04:38 PM
Nice day for a tenderfoot wedding, yous 2 are as compatible as singular and neuro.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAZQaYKZMTI
https://www.vidio.com/watch/68689-the-beatles-maxwell-s-silver-hammer-lyrics#
Hitch
6th December 2016, 04:40 PM
Nice day for a tenderfoot wedding, yous 2 are as compatible as singular and neuro.
The TenderHorn speaks. I was waiting for you to post in this thread. :)
crimethink
6th December 2016, 04:44 PM
Now, let us examine a tenderfoot in detail. We will use Crimethink as an example.
Try looking in the mirror.
Crimethink believes himself insightful, with the ability to see into others in a way they cannot see into themselves.
That is a fact. Most people live in an inauthentic, fake "reality," that I have no qualms about pointing out.
Crimethink suffers from the base "unchecked" passions inside himself. He cannot reasonably grasp the true nature of a person because his life remains unchecked.
LOL
The "liberated" woman assumes all men have unbridled passions - every man a rapist.
Because his body is sexually frustrated, he supposes others to be this way also, this is how he sees the world.
Hardly. :D
Did your "Women's Studies" professor teach you this?
Ximmy has repeatedly expressed her admiration for Trump, but Crimethink supposes there must be a sexual connotation.
All women who retain their sanity gravitate to strong men. It's an instinct that goes to the foundation of existence: reproduction. However, those who are urban hipsters, like yourself, have a distorted variant of that instinct, looking to celebrities, instead of real men.
This is a fine example of crimethink's limited baser thinking. The passionate thinking of a tenderfoot.
It's an accurate representation of your feelings, and you do not have the courage - or discernment - to admit it.
Trump said it himself: when you're a celebrity, "they let you do anything." He is right on someone like you.
Not content to suffer sexual transference from his own passion and placing it on ximmy.
I have a good mate. You? I have no need to "transfer" my "passion." You, however, believing you are Miss Perfect "deserving" of the unattainable "perfect" man, look to a fantasy instead of reality. Your god-king.
Crimethink also insinuates ximmy has greater-than-admiration for Trump, it must be divine worship.
My wife and I were just discussing, literally 30 minutes ago, how Odin & Thor went from ancient tribal leaders to "gods" over the centuries, as legends grew beyond the reality.
The feelings you - and others - have for Trump, as the "Savior" of America, are the feelings that, if continued over generations, turns mere men into "gods."
This is how a tenderfoot mind works, or better said, does not work properly. Crimethinks passions cannot comprehend a genuine admiration, it must include worship.
You do not merely "admire" Trump. One can admire an enemy. You are all out for the "Savior" of America.
Crimethink is one sick tenderfoot. His baser passions include many more troubling vices. But the most sorrowful one might be loneliness... if he is lonely everyone else must be too.
Oh, noes, here comes the pop psychology. Wait, maybe I'm being unfair, perhaps ximmy paid $2000 for her Jewish Psychology class to learn that "explanation."
Again this transference is directed at ximmy. Because crimethink is lonely, ximmy must be too. Crimethink imagines that ximmy, being unmarried, mandates her to loneliness or even to loser status...
Your statement here reveals a key about you, not me. I never said you were lonely. But you just admitted that, deep down, you are lonely.
Further, your statement here indicates, as I assert, that you are a "liberated" woman - a feminist, though you may reject that term. It is Natural Law that we take a mate. But no, you, being Miss Perfect, "don't need one," instead deriving your fulfillment from a celebrity.
Married or unmarried, could crimethink himself be a sad loser? Is this why he imagines ximmy to be unmarried or sad?
Another revelation. I never said you were unhappy or sad. The Spinster book I cited earlier endorses the spinster lifestyle as "fulfilling." I'm only pointing out that you are part of the Problem, not that you are "sad" or "lonely."
This gives us much to think about and is a helpful detailed analysis of a tenderfoot among us.
Indeed, it does. ximmy has revealed even more about herself, and why she is so defensive when someone illustrates her celebrity worship and spinsterism.
Horn
6th December 2016, 04:45 PM
The TenderHorn speaks. I was waiting for you to post in this thread. :)
my feet are as pure, sweet and soft as freshly spun cotton candy, thank you stinkfoot hitch... :)
if someone is not complaining we might aswell all hang ourselves..
crimethink
6th December 2016, 04:50 PM
Nice day for a tenderfoot wedding, yous 2 are as compatible as singular and neuro.
LOL
Under different circumstances, if ximmy is who and what she claims to be, we'd probably get along just fine IRL.
Her anthem...and the anthem of Sphincterism, too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0
Jewboo
6th December 2016, 09:34 PM
Now, let us examine a tenderfoot in detail. We will use Crimethink as an example.
Crimethink believes himself insightful, with the ability to see into others in a way they cannot see into themselves.
Crimethink suffers from the base "unchecked" passions inside himself. He cannot reasonably grasp the true nature of a person because his life remains unchecked.
Because his body is sexually frustrated, he supposes others to be this way also, this is how he sees the world.
Ximmy has repeatedly expressed her admiration for Trump, but Crimethink supposes there must be a sexual connotation.
This is a fine example of crimethink's limited baser thinking. The passionate thinking of a tenderfoot.
and
Not content to suffer sexual transference from his own passion and placing it on ximmy.
Crimethink also insinuates ximmy has greater-than-admiration for Trump, it must be divine worship.
This is how a tenderfoot mind works, or better said, does not work properly. Crimethinks passions cannot comprehend a genuine admiration, it must include worship.
Crimethink is one sick tenderfoot. His baser passions include many more troubling vices. But the most sorrowful one might be loneliness... if he is lonely everyone else must be too.
Again this transference is directed at ximmy. Because crimethink is lonely, ximmy must be too. Crimethink imagines that ximmy, being unmarried, mandates her to loneliness or even to loser status...
Married or unmarried, could crimethink himself be a sad loser? Is this why he imagines ximmy to be unmarried or sad?
This gives us much to think about and is a helpful detailed analysis of a tenderfoot among us.
http://theydiffer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Therapist-vs-Psychiatrist.jpg
:rolleyes:
Spectrism
7th December 2016, 11:00 AM
crimethink Fred- you are pitiful.
crimethink
7th December 2016, 02:08 PM
crimethink Fred- you are pitiful.
LOL
I just realized last night that your "time is almost out" .sig line has been modified since Trump won. It used to be gray almost to the end, but when your god-man Trump won, you moved the gray back, in accordance with your faith in Trump to "save" America.
I feel sorry for you.
hoarder
7th December 2016, 04:14 PM
Crimethink, now you can see things from my perspective when I argue with those of you who think Hitler was Whiteys last hope. People need their heroes to admire or give them hope.
The end result of Trump's presidency will disappoint many of his supporters, but how many will realize that the end result reveals the original intention.
Just thought I'd throw that one at you since it's hammer Crimethink week.
Spectrism
7th December 2016, 04:34 PM
LOL
I just realized last night that your "time is almost out" .sig line has been modified since Trump won. It used to be gray almost to the end, but when your god-man Trump won, you moved the gray back, in accordance with your faith in Trump to "save" America.
I feel sorry for you.
You just caught on to that now? A little more dim-witted than I thought. There have been many clues that went right by you.
If Clinton won, we had weeks left. Now we may have months. Either way, 2017 is a very crucial year. Between May and November we will see "worlds in collision" at a few different dimensions. With Trump we shift to a different dynamic. It will be inter-national even more than intra-national.
And you are still struggling with simple concepts like faith, salvation, and god.
ximmy
7th December 2016, 05:13 PM
since it's hammer Crimethink week.
Sorry sir, this ain't the case... Crimethink causes his own grief and pain... action - reaction... (causality). He is his own worst enemy... so sad.
http://www.gifbin.com/bin/reverse-3934yu85yu4.gif
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBpj7Ny88HE
hoarder
7th December 2016, 05:40 PM
Sorry sir, this ain't the case... Crimethink causes his own grief and pain... action - reaction... (causality). He is his own worst enemy... so sad. Because he doesn't worship Trumpowitz??
Spectrism
7th December 2016, 05:43 PM
Because he doesn't worship Trumpowitz??
Are you even stupider than Fredthink? Fred made up that concept that there are some "worshiping" Trump. He keeps saying what is not true (lying) and even the fools will begin to believe him if he says it enough.
Fredthink worships Hillary Clinton far more than I worship Trump. So hoarderthink it looks like you are also a worshiper of Hillary, and a dupe of Fredthink.
cheka.
7th December 2016, 05:47 PM
the modern child is afflicted with a term i coined: carpetfoot
amazing to ride around town on a summer day...and not see a.single.kid playing outside. if you do see one he/she is likely just transitioning from one indoor environ to another
Joshua01
7th December 2016, 06:09 PM
This thread is the gift that keeps on giving
crimethink
7th December 2016, 06:15 PM
Crimethink, now you can see things from my perspective when I argue with those of you who think Hitler was Whiteys last hope. People need their heroes to admire or give them hope.
The end result of Trump's presidency will disappoint many of his supporters, but how many will realize that the end result reveals the original intention.
Just thought I'd throw that one at you since it's hammer Crimethink week.
I still very much disagree with you on St. Adolphus, but I respect you. Because you are respectable. Was Hitler a Jew? Almost absolutely assuredly not.
But yes, many erect Hitler as god-king, too.
crimethink
7th December 2016, 06:20 PM
You just caught on to that now? A little more dim-witted than I thought. There have been many clues that went right by you.
I don't pay too much attention to false prophets like yourself, not enough to instantly notice such a change.
If Clinton won, we had weeks left. Now we may have months. Either way, 2017 is a very crucial year. Between May and November we will see "worlds in collision" at a few different dimensions. With Trump we shift to a different dynamic. It will be inter-national even more than intra-national.
Nothing has changed except the names & faces, and the style of rulership.
The idea you can prophecy "the End" marks you as a religious charlatan. The End will come as a thief in the night. People, including you, will think things are "going well" / "better" - and then It happens.
Would Her Majesty have started war with Russia over Syria? Perhaps. Will Trump start was with Russia over Iran? Equally likely, considering his warmonger "defense" secretary.
And you are still struggling with simple concepts like faith, salvation, and god.
LOL
I never put God in lower case letters, but you do.
I don't struggle with the realities of faith, salvation, or God.
I am opened to new wonders of and from God each and every day, because my faith that He will reveal more and more remains. Salvation is in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, alone, and I don't "struggle" with that fact, because of faith. John 3:16.
I placed no hope in Trump, as did you, because they are all liars.
crimethink
7th December 2016, 06:21 PM
Sorry sir, this ain't the case... Crimethink causes his own grief and pain... action - reaction... (causality). He is his own worst enemy... so sad.
The poop psychologist speaks!
ximmy actually voted for Hillary, but merely pretends to be a Trump supporter here. Hillary - not Trump - concurs with ximmy's "liberated" woman ideology.
Cebu_4_2
7th December 2016, 06:22 PM
the modern child is afflicted with a term i coined: carpetfoot
amazing to ride around town on a summer day...and not see a.single.kid playing outside. if you do see one he/she is likely just transitioning from one indoor environ to another
My kids be out there in a sand box or play toys or electric little cars but when they hear something coming they rush back to the house.
It's simple, let them play and let them know when to be alert. I don't think 2 years old is too early, kids are smarter than most older people in most ways.
crimethink
7th December 2016, 06:23 PM
Are you even stupider than Fredthink? Fred made up that concept that there are some "worshiping" Trump. He keeps saying what is not true (lying) and even the fools will begin to believe him if he says it enough.
Fredthink worships Hillary Clinton far more than I worship Trump. So hoarderthink it looks like you are also a worshiper of Hillary, and a dupe of Fredthink.
hoarder, Rebbe Sphincterism is a crypto, so consider that when reading his spew.
hoarder a worshiper of Hillary Clinton? ROTFLMAO! That's even more insane than claiming I worship her.
hoarder
7th December 2016, 06:24 PM
Was Hitler a Jew? Almost absolutely assuredly not. Almost. We're making some progress.
I think most of these folks here think Trump is almost absolutely assuredly not a Jew.
hoarder, Rebbe Sphincterism is a crypto, so consider that when reading his spew. He was outed long ago. Haven't read many of his posts since.
Spectrism
7th December 2016, 07:59 PM
hoarder, Rebbe Sphincterism is a crypto, so consider that when reading his spew.
hoarder a worshiper of Hillary Clinton? ROTFLMAO! That's even more insane than claiming I worship her.
He was outed long ago. Haven't read many of his posts since.
I would rather be a jew than a delusional psychopath. My Messiah was born a Jew. See the demonic ways of Fredcrime and the doubleminded way he cannot deal with this. He claims to have faith in Messiah yet shows his faith is in himself. He hates Jews. I don't hate Jews. For someone to call me a jew as if that will hurt me is a pretty good indicator of their heart condition.
crimethink
7th December 2016, 08:15 PM
I would rather be a jew than a delusional psychopath.
What's the difference?
My Messiah was born a Jew.
Yours probably was. My Messiah, Jesus Christ, was born a non-Khazar Judean.
He hates Jews. I don't hate Jews.
Telling someone they are "of their father the Devil" is pretty damning; John 8:44
I don't hate Judeans or even Jews who have discarded the Talmud.
Spectrism
8th December 2016, 06:12 AM
What's the difference?
A jew is one from the tribe of Judah. It can also be used to described religious followings.
You think all jews are psychopaths as you project your own failings on others.
Yours probably was. My Messiah, Jesus Christ, was born a non-Khazar Judean.
No. Yahshuah was born a JEW of the tribe of Judah. You dare sully His name and associate your perversions with the Messiah. Shameful.
Telling someone they are "of their father the Devil" is pretty damning; John 8:44
You pretend to operate under the authority of scripture in your general hate but this scripture was directed at specific individuals. The disciples of Yahshuah at that time were ALL JEWS. So clearly he was not damning all JEWS.
I don't hate Judeans or even Jews who have discarded the Talmud.
So you ascribe to all jews the labels of khazarians and/or Talmudists. And this justifies in your perverted mind the hate you spew for anyone that finds fault in your psychotic words.
crimethink
8th December 2016, 11:43 AM
A jew is one from the tribe of Judah.
Jew is a term invented in the last several centuries, which applies to the follower of the Babylonian Talmud, the written form of the Satanic "traditions of the Elders" condemned by Christ.
It is not a term with a strong relation to actual biology, and, in most cases, "Jews" have no biological connection to the ancient tribe of Judah.
You think all jews are psychopaths as you project your own failings on others.
I don't follow the teachings of the Babylonian Talmud. Anyone who does, thinking it is something to be revered and respected, is, indeed, a delusional psychopath.
Yahshuah was born a JEW of the tribe of Judah.
There were no "Jews" 2000 years ago. There were Judeans.
You dare sully His name and associate your perversions with the Messiah. Shameful.
Ah, you're learning to cover your tracks! You placed the English-standard article "the" in front of Messiah. Previously, and consistently, you wrote it as "Messiah" without the article, a Talmudist habit.
It is you who sully His name by pretending He had anything in common with these modern Satanists popularly called "Jews."
You pretend to operate under the authority of scripture in your general hate but this scripture was directed at specific individuals.
It was directed at the keepers of the traditions of the Elders, and, as such, continues to be aimed at those who follow those traditions of the Elders, now known as the Babylonian Talmud aka "Judaism."
The disciples of Yahshuah at that time were ALL JEWS. So clearly he was not damning all JEWS.
Yet another lie from you: Christ's disciples were Judeans, as previously explained to you.
But let's look at what Matthew says:
"Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."
The Satanic decision to betray the Messiah in favor of a thug is "on our children," that is, the actual and ideological descendants of the keepers of the traditions of the Elders.
The only way to escape that is, as for all of us, to accept the Christ, the Messiah, as He has revealed Himself to us, and not in the manner you Judeo-"Christians" insist (e.g., Jew-worship).
So you ascribe to all jews the labels of khazarians and/or Talmudists.
With extremely minor exceptions, modern "Jews" are either Khazars and/or Talmudists...and the latter include the Applied Talmudism of Marxism.
Here is a born-ethnic-Jew and former Talmudist who I respect and consider a brother in Christ:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPmfd1XND1M
Notice how he calls himself a "former" Jew.
And this justifies in your perverted mind the hate you spew for anyone that finds fault in your psychotic words.
Sphincterism! I never thought you'd admit you are an agent of the ADL or SPLC or both! This "hate" meme you're trying to stick to me betrays you.
Horn
8th December 2016, 12:27 PM
A tenderfoot is Not a dirty muslim.
Spectrism
8th December 2016, 12:34 PM
Jew is a term invented in the last several centuries, which applies to the follower of the Babylonian Talmud, the written form of the Satanic "traditions of the Elders" condemned by Christ.
It is not a term with a strong relation to actual biology, and, in most cases, "Jews" have no biological connection to the ancient tribe of Judah.
There were no "Jews" 2000 years ago. There were Judeans.
Thanks for your attempt to rewrite history. Nice fiction.
---------
The Hebrew word for Jew, יְהוּדִי ISO 259-3 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_259-3) Yhudi, is pronounced [jehuˈdi] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Hebrew), with the stress on the final syllable, in Israeli Hebrew, in its basic form.[49] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews#cite_note-EJ253-49) The Ladino (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladino_language) name is ג׳ודיו, Djudio (sg.); ג׳ודיוס, Djudios (pl.); Yiddish (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yiddish_language): ייִד Yid (sg.); ייִדן, Yidn (pl.).
The etymological equivalent is in use in other languages, e.g., يَهُودِيّ yahūdī (sg.), al-yahūd (pl.), and بَنُو اِسرَائِيل banū isrāʼīl in Arabic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic), "Jude" in German (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_language), "judeu" in Portuguese (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_language), "juif" in French (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_language), "jøde" in Danish (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_language) and Norwegian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_language), "judío" in Spanish (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_language), "jood" in Dutch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_language), "żyd" in Polish (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_language) etc., but derivations of the word "Hebrew" are also in use to describe a Jew, e.g., in Italian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_language) (Ebreo), in Persian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_language) ("Ebri/Ebrani" (Persian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_language): عبری/عبرانی)) and Russian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_language) (Еврей, Yevrey).[50] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews#cite_note-50) The German word "Jude" is pronounced [ˈjuːdə] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_German), the corresponding adjective (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjective) "jüdisch" [ˈjyːdɪʃ] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_German) (Jewish) is the origin of the word "Yiddish".[51] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews#cite_note-51) (See Jewish ethnonyms (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_ethnonyms) for a full overview.)
----------------
The tribe of Y'hudah (Judah) was the larger of the 2 remaining from the original 12. Depending on languages, J is used instead of Y. YOU yourself keep using "J"esus rather than His original name Yahshuah, or even Yahuahshuah or Yahushuah. There were no "J"s in Hebrew or aramaic. And now you want to quibble over Jewdean or a shortened version Jew. There was no Judean 2000 years ago. The correct name was Yehudah or Yahudah.
Ah, you're learning to cover your tracks! You placed the English-standard article "the" in front of Messiah. Previously, and consistently, you wrote it as "Messiah" without the article, a Talmudist habit.
You play games like a jew lawyer. And you have presumed a behavior on me that exists only in your own mind.
It is you who sully His name by pretending He had anything in common with these modern Satanists popularly called "Jews."
And I did no such thing. You are perverse in the twisting of your lies.
Yet another lie from you: Christ's disciples were Judeans, as previously explained to you.
But let's look at what Matthew says:
"Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."
The Satanic decision to betray the Messiah in favor of a thug is "on our children," that is, the actual and ideological descendants of the keepers of the traditions of the Elders.
The only way to escape that is, as for all of us, to accept the Christ, the Messiah, as He has revealed Himself to us, and not in the manner you Judeo-"Christians" insist (e.g., Jew-worship).
And you missed the point of what the Messiah did. You have no place in Him unless you are washed in His blood. It wasn't just the children of "those satanists" who would have His blood on them, but ALL who are sinners. We are all guilty of the blood of Messiah.
With extremely minor exceptions, modern "Jews" are either Khazars and/or Talmudists...and the latter include the Applied Talmudism of Marxism.
You are amazing to be a walking DNA seer of millions. Did you learn that trick from a palm reader?
Sphincterism! I never thought you'd admit you are an agent of the ADL or SPLC or both! This "hate" meme you're trying to stick to me betrays you.
You are full of hate and bitterness. It exudes from you. Lash out in your false pride. Be an accuser of the saved. Your fall is before you.
Horn
16th December 2016, 05:37 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrIPhFWSudA
Joshua01
16th December 2016, 07:02 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrIPhFWSudA
You can easily tell the brave chicks from the beauty queens! The Chinese stand out
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.