PDA

View Full Version : Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES



Ares
7th December 2016, 08:08 AM
More bad news for Democrats—
Green Party candidate Jill Stein’s Michigan recount unintentionally exposed this major voting fraud scandal.

In Detroit, one of the chief ways they engage in voter fraud is to count the same ballot MULTIPLE times. This is just ONE way. They also do some shady stuff with absentee ballots etc.

Once they started the Michigan recount in earnest, and knowing he would be exposed, the Detroit City Clerk Daniel Baxter all of a sudden started claiming that the optical scanners which read the paper ballots did not work the day of the election. Baxter blamed the discrepancies on decade-old voting machines. That is his cover story. Nothing like this was mentioned until he realized their voting fraud scheme would be detected.

Baxter’s claim is that, when trying to push the ballots through the readers, the ballots would be stuck and they’d have to push them through again thus ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ resulting in a double count. He says the poll workers sometimes ‘FORGET’ to adjust the machine count and instead let the ballot count twice.

Of course, that’s COMPLETELY BULLSH*T.

** Over One-Third of Detroit Precincts Will Not Be Recounted Due to Ballot Discrepancies

And, it’s much worse than that.
In one Detroit Precinct, a recount team was given a box of ballots with an unbroken seal where everything appeared proper and in place. The tag on the box said there were 306 ballots. The book said 306, and the ticket said 306, so that means there should be 306 paper ballots on the box. When they pulled out the ballots, there were exactly FIFTY paper ballots in a locked sealed box that again was supposed to have 306. The official canvasser approved count for this precinct was 306. For FIFTY ballots.

It looks like Detroit counts each vote more than SIX TIMES! No wonder they get such high turnout rates!

Ken Crider, who helped with the recount in Cobo Hall in Detroit, posted this on Facebook last night. Ken said a ballot box in Detroit had been tampered with — and that each vote was counted SIX TIMES!

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/12/revealed-michigan-recount-uncovers-massive-voter-fraud-detroit-precincts/

Spectrism
7th December 2016, 09:26 AM
http://www.tellusdetroit.com/city-gov/clerk/images/Daniel%20Baxter%20471.jpg
I suspected it was a refined pavement ape.

Cebu_4_2
7th December 2016, 11:28 AM
Michigan Recount: Over 1/2 of Hillary Clinton’s Detroit Vote Faces Disqualification

Michigan votes in areas that voted for Hillary Clinton have been inflated due to worker error disqualifying recounts under state law.

Ingham County Clerk Barb Byrum explains how entire voting precincts may be non-recountable in the presidential election recount that began Monday in Ingham and Oakland counties. Chad Livengood, The Detroit News

Michigan officials say they can not reconcile vote counts in 610 of 1,680 precincts, or 59% of the precincts, in Michigan’s largest county , Wayne County, which Hillary won by a margin of 2 to 1 over Donald Trump because the original vote counts in the poll books do not match the number of votes in the machine printout reports.

Specifically, the number of votes recorded by the voting machines were higher than the number of voters that were logged into to vote in these precincts.

The news comes as Hillary Clinton lost 32,423 votes in day 5 of the Wisconsin recount (http://alexanderhiggins.com/hillary-clinton-loses-32423-votes-day-5-wisconsin-recount/) which are now showing anomalies that may indicate absentee ballot fraud in Milwaukee (http://alexanderhiggins.com/wisconsin-recount-shows-potential-clinton-vote-fraud/).

In many cases Canvassers say there were aware of the discrepancies in the original vote counts but gave no explanation for the why counts did not match up but certified the original election counts anyway.

Now officials are mainly blaming the discrepancy on jams in the optical ballots in the scanners which forced workers to run the same ballots through the machines more than once.

To prevent a ballot scanned multiple times from being counted as more than one vote poll workers were supposed to adjust the machine counters but officials stated the workers failed to do so in many cases.

They also state in more rare cases there could have been issues with people not having identification being manually placed in boxes or rare human errors such as sealing the wrong number of votes for certification due to transposing numbers.

Michigan state law requires precincts which poll books don’t match to be excluded from the recount and if the recount results can’t be certified, which requires reconciliation of the counts, the original certified results stand.

Issues due to human error, such as sealing the wrong number of votes in the original certification should be easily reconciled during a hand recount but in the precincts in question they are unable to reconcile the votes.

The discrepancy was only uncovered yesterday after an Obama appointed judge issued a midnight ruling ordering a hand recount in Michigan on Sunday.

Despite state law requiring the votes be disqualified election officials are fighting to keep the counts included and believe that not all of the 392 precincts will be excluded from the final recount.

There are also discrepancies in other counties Clinton carried but they are not as widespread as Detroit
Clinton carried Genesee County, which includes Flint, where so far 13 of 222 precincts are reported with invalid results but officials certified the results there as well.

Officials in Ingham reported six of their 30 precincts from Lansing including a ballot box with a hole in it which could have been used to slip in fraudulent ballots or remove legitimate ones.

Votes in Rochester Hills precinct 11 in Oakland county have been disqualified after more ballots were found in the machine logs than were actually in the ballot box. Workers could offer no explanation other than it didn’t match in the original certified results and it doesn’t match now before conceding that the precinct is not recountable.

Cebu_4_2
7th December 2016, 01:00 PM
Democrat Voter Fraud EXPOSED Via Michigan Recount Efforts – This Is How They Steal Elections
Posted on December 7, 2016 by DCWhispers

Some readers will likely recall shortly after the 2012 election some rather odd voting precincts that actually tallied far MORE votes than registered voters – votes that went almost exclusively to Barack Obama. The media ignored those numbers, and local election offices merely shrugged off the questions as to how this could be as a simple matter of Election Day “discrepancies.”

Now, thanks to the recount effort underway in Michigan, the outright fraud of the Democrat Party’s election machine is being exposed for all to see. To those who have long said theft and thievery were the order of the day and then dismissed by others as a conspiracy theorist, your concerns are being proven right.

Via The Gateway Pundit :

“…In Detroit, one of the chief ways they engage in voter fraud is to count the same ballot MULTIPLE times. This is just ONE way. They also do some shady stuff with absentee ballots etc.

“…Baxter’s claim is that, when trying to push the ballots through the readers, the ballots would be stuck and they’d have to push them through again thus ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ resulting in a double count. He says the poll workers sometimes ‘FORGET’ to adjust the machine count and instead let the ballot count twice.

Of course, that’s COMPLETELY BULLSH*T.

…And, it’s much worse than that.
In one Detroit Precinct, a recount team was given a box of ballots with an unbroken seal where everything appeared proper and in place. The tag on the box said there were 306 ballots. The book said 306, and the ticket said 306, so that means there should be 306 paper ballots on the box. When they pulled out the ballots, there were exactly FIFTY paper ballots in a locked sealed box that again was supposed to have 306. The official canvasser approved count for this precinct was 306. For FIFTY ballots.



It looks like Detroit counts each vote more than SIX TIMES! No wonder they get such high turnout rates!”

———————–

The above is EXACTLY how elections have been stolen in this country. The urban centers are used to “stuff” the final voting tally in order to secure Democrat victories in critical swing states like Michigan and Pennsylvania, and the media is quick to report “significant” voter turnout in those same urban areas as justification for the inflated numbers – even, as in the case during the 2012 Election, far more votes were counted than actual voters.

It didn’t work in 2016 because Donald Trump’s support was so significant it was able to overcome the built-in election fraud. The recounts going on today have more to do with Democrats wanting to know how much MORE fraud will have to be baked into the process to ensure a Trump-like upset never happens again.

What is going on in Michigan right now is undeniable proof of a election system rife with corruption that favors the Democrat Party, and so, the Mainstream Media will ignore the story and perhaps go on to call those willing to report on it, “fake news.”

Don’t let them get away with it. This is the power of social media. YOU can now do the job the media chooses not so.

Educate/share with others this issue. If you are unhappy with the last eight years or more, if you feel America has lost its way, this kind of election fraud must be stopped. That will only happen if more are made aware of the truth, and not allowed to simply accept the Establishment’s version of a carefully crafted false reality.

crimethink
7th December 2016, 02:22 PM
Trump won the popular vote. Only fools and madmen dispute that.

Did Jill Stein know this would happen, and wanted to expose it to spite Clinton? Or all leftists really that stupid?

Cebu_4_2
7th December 2016, 02:25 PM
Trump won the popular vote. Only fools and madmen dispute that.

Did Jill Stein know this would happen, and wanted to expose it to spite Clinton? Or all leftists really that stupid?

The hope was to extend the count past deadline to lose the electorate vote.

crimethink
7th December 2016, 02:30 PM
The hope was to extend the count past deadline to lose the electorate vote.

So, stupid then, since the House decides the President if the Electoral College is rendered impotent.

Cebu_4_2
7th December 2016, 02:44 PM
So, stupid then, since the House decides the President if the Electoral College is rendered impotent.

Both despiration and scorned women know no bounds.