View Full Version : Snopes Co-Founder Accused Of Embezzling Company Money, Spending It On Prostitutes
Down1
21st December 2016, 05:03 PM
If one needs another reason to ignore this site.
The founder of mythbusting website Snopes, which was recently tapped by Facebook as one of four “fact-check” organizations patrolling the site for “fake news,” embezzled $98,000 in company funds before spending it on “himself and the prostitutes he hired,” according to legal documents filed by his ex-wife reviewed by the Daily Mail.
After divorcing from his first wife, Barbara Mikkelson, David Mikkelson married Elyssa Young, a former porn star and current escort who now works for Snopes as an administrator, according to the Daily Mail.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/21/snopes-co-founder-accused-of-embezzling-company-money-spending-it-on-prostitutes/
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/21/snopes-co-founder-accused-of-embezzling-company-money-spending-it-on-prostitutes/
Big article below.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
Joshua01
21st December 2016, 06:58 PM
If one needs another reason to ignore this site.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/21/snopes-co-founder-accused-of-embezzling-company-money-spending-it-on-prostitutes/
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/21/snopes-co-founder-accused-of-embezzling-company-money-spending-it-on-prostitutes/
Big article below.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
What a world!
Spectrism
21st December 2016, 07:02 PM
Yeah baby! Hey, did you check snopes to see if this is true?
Cebu_4_2
21st December 2016, 07:16 PM
Again this proves Prostitutes are less expensive than Ex Wives.
crimethink
21st December 2016, 07:27 PM
I feel so guilty about the schadenfreude I have for that prick.
This should do wonders for Snopes' "credibility."
PatColo
26th July 2017, 09:02 AM
UK vlogger The Outer Light,
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0gpEHCsPyRE/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCNACELwBSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLAGwyV142QcEbrMbPPjEMcfmieQYg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gpEHCsPyRE) 16:08
Snopes / The Minstry of Truth, state they have run out of money (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gpEHCsPyRE)
4,049 views
1 day ago
Dachsie
26th July 2017, 09:54 AM
We are being gamed again. More 3D chess.
The same big money that funded Snopes to begin with is now either LIHOP or MIHOP this story to get our reaction which THEY see use for.
On the surface it looks like just desserts for the snopes liars for pay and that's what we long to see.
Snopes has always been a complete joke, so why are we shocked when they ostensibly do other forms of lying -- theft and fornication?
Liars for pay on the web are no different than "presstitutes" on MSM.
Reminds me how I saw today how Wikipedia is now begging for donations. Wikipedia appearing to be poor and suffering just like real truth tellers does not make Wikipedia a truth teller.
(Never could find the info I was seeking on Wikipedia / Schultz entry. Wanted to determine if Debbie Wasserman Schultz was allowed to be DNC chairperson at the same time that she is a sitting U.S. congress member. Seems very irregular to me that that would have been permissable.)
hoarder
26th July 2017, 10:03 AM
We are being gamed again. More 3D chess.
The same big money that funded Snopes to begin with is now either LIHOP or MIHOP this story to get our reaction which THEY see use for.
On the surface it looks like just desserts for the snopes liars for pay and that's what we long to see.
Snopes has always been a complete joke, so why are we shocked when they ostensibly do other forms of lying -- theft and fornication?
Liars for pay on the web are no different than "presstitutes" on MSM.
Reminds me how I saw today how Wikipedia is now begging for donations. Wikipedia appearing to be poor and suffering just like real truth tellers does not make Wikipedia a truth teller.
(Never could find the info I was seeking on Wikipedia / Schultz entry. Wanted to determine if Debbie Wasserman Schultz was allowed to be DNC chairperson at the same time that she is a sitting U.S. congress member. Seems very irregular to me that that would have been permissable.)Agree about wiki, but Snopes destroying their own credibility does not pass the strategic value test.
PatColo
26th July 2017, 10:09 AM
^ yeah I still say, (((wikipedia))) brings some value wrt anything politically neutral; but anything politically loaded, fuggedaboudit!
Pizzagate conspiracy theory - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory)
Pizzagate is a (((debunked))) conspiracy theory that emerged during the 2016 United States presidential election cycle. The theory, which went viral, claimed that John ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory
Both KBarrett & JFetzer have told the stories of wiki entries for them which they didn't create, which told blatant mis/disinfo about them. They'd try to edit the entry, only to have their edits changed back within MINUTES. Fetzer tells of how he went round & round editing again, only to have the same result minutes later. So he messaged the (((super-mod))) or whatever they're called, and said "you're not going to allow me to change this, are you?", to which they bluntly replied, "No."
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-x2DFnGI9Ac/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCNACELwBSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLDDfO_7G4O8vZSAxRKQwvyUtxbjrA2:04
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x2DFnGI9Ac) Wikipedia - Israel is paying internet workers to manipulate online content (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x2DFnGI9Ac)
My0neManArmy (https://www.youtube.com/user/My0neManArmy)
6 years ago
43,814 views
0:12 "..The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit Wikipedia which is the number one source of information today in the ...
Hodges/Common Sense Show. This vid is over 1/2 commercial, so kill it 1:35 where the ad starts:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/M4yRygKduhU/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCNACELwBSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLDOLxJnpcRSD6ZVmkFWVGnBXHYR6w (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4yRygKduhU) 3:54
Do Not Send Money to Snopes Go Fund Me-Here Is Why (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4yRygKduhU)
1,200 views
11 hours ago
Dachsie
26th July 2017, 10:19 AM
" Snopes destroying their own credibility does not pass the strategic value test. "
There are a whole lot of things that have made me come to a deeper understanding of what "strategic value" is. Because I do not think like THEY do, it is difficult to imagine their twisted serpentine, multi-layered deception schemes orchestrated by their god, the father of lies.
It is very old truth that those of the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit are deliberately promoting anti-semitism, and there is such a thing as true anti-semitism, something E. Michael Jones explains very well and something Saul Alinksy actively foments from his grave.
hoarder
26th July 2017, 11:25 AM
^ yeah I still say, (((wikipedia))) brings some value wrt anything politically neutral; but anything politically loaded, fuggedaboudit!Practically NOTHING is politically neutral, as far as Jews are concerned. Whenever Jews make any statement, and this includes crypto Jews, one must ask oneself "what angle are they working?"
There are a whole lot of things that have made me come to a deeper understanding of what "strategic value" is. Because I do not think like THEY do, it is difficult to imagine their twisted serpentine, multi-layered deception schemes orchestrated by their god, the father of lies.Assessing strategic value has a moral hurdle. Most gentiles have great difficulty in seeing what has strategic value because strategy is PURE LOGIC devoid of morality. Jews think that way naturally.
Most gentiles don't even want to learn to think that way for fear of becoming as perverse as Jews, but I don't think it's sick to train myself to see the world through my enemies eyes so that I may protect myself and my people from their misdeeds.
crimethink
26th July 2017, 11:47 AM
Wikipedia - Israel is paying internet workers to manipulate online content
Huh?
Wikipedia is a Jewish creation, founded by Jewish Randroid & pornographer Jimmy Wales. There are thousands of mentally unbalanced types that "manage" Wikipedia, for free. Key articles are certified Kosher, and any changes, no matter how factual, are automatically reverted.
I learned years ago not to try to correct factual errors at Wikipedia, and I laugh at their pleas for money.
crimethink
26th July 2017, 11:53 AM
It is very old truth that those of the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit are deliberately promoting anti-semitism, and there is such a thing as true anti-semitism, something E. Michael Jones explains very well and something Saul Alinksy actively foments from his grave.
"Anti-Semitism" is Pro-Christism.
It is well-known the Jews insist the New Testament is "anti-Semitic."
crimethink
26th July 2017, 11:57 AM
Practically NOTHING is politically neutral, as far as Jews are concerned.
Indeed. Even toilet paper is political for the Jews and their "liberal" lackeys. Using "too much" must be shamed as "selfish" and "against the Earth."
Whenever Jews make any statement, and this includes crypto Jews, one must ask oneself "what angle are they working?"
Assessing strategic value has a moral hurdle. Most gentiles have great difficulty in seeing what has strategic value because strategy is PURE LOGIC devoid of morality. Jews think that way naturally.
Yes. This is why the "Big Lie" works so well, as you know who explained.
Modern "science" is devoid of morality, and, hence, it is thoroughly Jewish in nature.
Most gentiles don't even want to learn to think that way for fear of becoming as perverse as Jews, but I don't think it's sick to train myself to see the world through my enemies eyes so that I may protect myself and my people from their misdeeds.
It requires a solid personal constitution to be able to accurately analyze Jewish strategy and tactics without becoming a Jew oneself. I don't begrudge those who choose not to, provided they don't naively claim "Jewish people (sic) would never do that."
hoarder
26th July 2017, 12:10 PM
Modern "science" is devoid of morality, and, hence, it is thoroughly Jewish in nature. Modern science is often devoid of science too. It's just whatever happens to be in the Jews interests, twisted facts, outright fabrications and omissions packaged to achieve some objective.
It requires a solid personal constitution to be able to accurately analyze Jewish strategy and tactics without becoming a Jew oneself. I don't begrudge those who choose not to, provided they don't naively claim "Jewish people (sic) would never do that."You sure don't leave out many for begrudgement. Those who are incapable or unable to analyze Jewish strategy and tactics most like DO naively claim Jews would never do that. It kinda goes hand in hand.
Dachsie
26th July 2017, 12:57 PM
Fides et Ratio
crimethink
26th July 2017, 09:17 PM
Modern science is often devoid of science too. It's just whatever happens to be in the Jews interests, twisted facts, outright fabrications and omissions packaged to achieve some objective.
No argument from me. I don't have a Ph.D. because of this fact. "Crimethink, you're so smart, why don't you join the doctoral program?" I got asked that more than once. Same goes with why I didn't attend "law" school.
You sure don't leave out many for begrudgement. Those who are incapable or unable to analyze Jewish strategy and tactics most like DO naively claim Jews would never do that. It kinda goes hand in hand.
I use the term begrudge with this secondary meaning: "to look upon with disapproval." I should clarify my thoughts.
I don't expect everyone to believe the Jews are the source of our woes. I simply can't. Not everyone has the cognitive capacity nor the ability to perceive from the Enemy's perspective, as you or I do. We are fighting against the most efficient and effective weapons system (the Jewsmedia, combined with the public skool apparatus) in the history of the world. Everything is stacked against us in trying to prove to people that the world is not as it seems, it is not right, and we're heading for disaster, largely because the world is based on Judeo-Babylonian ideas and managed by Jews and those who share those Judeo-Babylonian ideas.
Even when combatting the Holocaust™, look at it from the average Goy's perspective: we're asking them to disbelieve everything they thought they "knew" about "the greatest horror of all time." Even if we can reach them rationally, emotionally that's going to be a bridge too far for the vast majority. They might know, deep in their reasoned mind, that we are correct, but the thought that "they" have been able to pull that over on the world frightens them...and it should.
Not everyone is born to be a warrior, physically and/or mentally. I can't fault those who won't join our fight, as long as they don't actively interfere.
crimethink
26th July 2017, 09:18 PM
Fides et Ratio
I see no conflict between the two, and more than there is a conflict between faith and real science. The "conflict" is only from the fanatic materialists. Most of whom are the usual suspects (shalom).
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.