View Full Version : Gab
Shami-Amourae
23rd December 2016, 11:26 PM
Gab is a new social network meant to be a free speech alternative/competition for Twitter.
https://gab.ai
Many of the members are Alt-Right people who have been banned from Twitter at various times. Twitter has an anti-Alt-Right policy, while they allow groups like ISIS to recruit over Twitter without any hesitation. There's already some major people on the platform who post on both Gab and Twitter regularly.
Gab uses a symbol of a frog, to sync up with Pepe the Frog.
http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/08/gab-logo-640x480.jpg
Breitbart article on Gab:
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/09/01/free-speech-social-network-gab-growing-as-twitter-facebook-censor-users/
crimethink
24th December 2016, 01:03 AM
Another dot-com startup that will crash.
Eventually, you will learn the masses don't care. They like Twatter.
osoab
24th December 2016, 05:02 AM
Another dot-com startup that will crash.
Eventually, you will learn the masses don't care. They like Twatter.
That is not a fair assessment.
Twitter is the only one that is pushed to the masses.
An alternative type of "Twatter" that gets some steam, might be enough to bring Twitter down.
Twitter is hemorrhaging money and talent currently.
Joshua01
24th December 2016, 05:33 AM
Another dot-com startup that will crash.
Eventually, you will learn the masses don't care. They like Twatter.
You probably said that about alt news sites too Fred.
crimethink
24th December 2016, 11:26 AM
That is not a fair assessment.
Twitter is the only one that is pushed to the masses.
An alternative type of "Twatter" that gets some steam, might be enough to bring Twitter down.
Twitter is hemorrhaging money and talent currently.
All "social media" is overvalued in the Wall Street Casino, hence, the appearance of "problems." Nonetheless, there are hundreds of millions of leftists and other fools who "tweet" daily; most, hourly.
The likelihood of Gab effectively challenging Twatter as a free speech zone is zero. Should it actually grow influential, one of the weapons will be to simply "acquire" it by some System corporation, say, Micro$oft. And then, bye bye "hate speech."
Freedom of thought and expression will remain a guerilla / underground activity, in this time of "universal deceit."
osoab
24th December 2016, 11:52 AM
All "social media" is overvalued in the Wall Street Casino, hence, the appearance of "problems." Nonetheless, there are hundreds of millions of leftists and other fools who "tweet" daily; most, hourly.
The likelihood of Gab effectively challenging Twatter as a free speech zone is zero. Should it actually grow influential, one of the weapons will be to simply "acquire" it by some System corporation, say, Micro$oft. And then, bye bye "hate speech."
Freedom of thought and expression will remain a guerilla / underground activity, in this time of "universal deceit."
Is Gab going for an IPO?
A competent competitor to Twatter is what can easily bring down it's owner.
They need Trump to Gab as well. Twatter would be over. I don't see it happening though. Too much risk for Trump.
Dogman
24th December 2016, 11:57 AM
This startup has as much chance to make any dent as one trying to piss up wind into a hurricane and avoid blow back..
But maybe this gab would be a way to bleed off the idiots..
;D
Dogman
24th December 2016, 12:27 PM
Is Gab going for an IPO?
A competent competitor to Twatter is what can easily bring down it's owner.
They need Trump to Gab as well. Twatter would be over. I don't see it happening though. Too much risk for Trump.
Feel if Trump seriously oversteps , impeachment processes would kick in.
The majority of the population will decide, and the political critters in office if they want to keep their jobs Will turn on him.
Amazing on the number of repubs now suddenly love Putin,
I very well suspect more people will turn out to vote in two years to vote many asshats out of office ,
If this insanity contues !
All he needs to piss off enough voters that voted for change and his brand of change is not theirs .
Tho cannot deny the intertainment value is priceless!
Drain the swamp, hell he is establishing himself as the head gator and the swamp level never changes!
Santa
24th December 2016, 02:35 PM
I welcome competition.
Jewboo
9th August 2018, 06:07 PM
https://images.encyclopediadramatica.rs/8/8f/Gabai.png
https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Gab.ai
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1518419352786.jpg
:rolleyes:
(https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1518419352786.jpg)
osoab
9th August 2018, 07:14 PM
You miss this place just as much as it misses you Book. :)
What's the deal with Microsoft going after Gab?
Neuro
10th August 2018, 12:45 PM
You miss this place just as much as it misses you Book. :)
What's the deal with Microsoft going after Gab?
Yes we do miss the regular posts of book.
Probably Gab got some traction somewhere
Jewboo
10th August 2018, 02:36 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXoOWEOP2cQ
This video from a week ago is very favorable to Andrew Torba. Seems like a decent guy and actually not a jew ? ? ?
Maybe Shami can chime in here...
:(??
Jewboo
27th October 2018, 09:10 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXoOWEOP2cQ
This video from a week ago is very favorable to Andrew Torba. Seems like a decent guy and actually not a jew ? ? ?
Maybe Shami can chime in here...
:(??
https://web.archive.org/web/20181027160428/https://imgur.com/a/cwB9QkR
:rolleyes:
(https://web.archive.org/web/20181027160428/https://imgur.com/a/cwB9QkR)
Bigjon
28th October 2018, 11:12 AM
I am told over at FreeZOXee that Robert Bowers was filled with hate and told lies about Jews and threatened them. Yet when I look at what the above link shows, it says to me he was just telling the truth, a thing all Jews hate.
If anyone can post something that he said that was a lie or was a threat, I would like to know if there is any truth or just more of the same old Jew bullshit that passes for truth.
End Times
30th October 2018, 10:11 PM
I am told over at FreeZOXee that Robert Bowers was filled with hate and told lies about Jews and threatened them. Yet when I look at what the above link shows, it says to me he was just telling the truth, a thing all Jews hate.
If anyone can post something that he said that was a lie or was a threat, I would like to know if there is any truth or just more of the same old Jew bullshit that passes for truth.
I do not know what to believe about the Pittsburgh Incident. As usual, all does not seem to be as it is said to be. Bowers' statements online were grounded in facts we know to be true.
Neuro
31st October 2018, 03:51 AM
I am told over at FreeZOXee that Robert Bowers was filled with hate and told lies about Jews and threatened them. Yet when I look at what the above link shows, it says to me he was just telling the truth, a thing all Jews hate.
If anyone can post something that he said that was a lie or was a threat, I would like to know if there is any truth or just more of the same old Jew bullshit that passes for truth.
The old tradition of poisoning the well? “Bowers” is evil for killing innocent Jews. Therefore if anyone else entertain the same thoughts he expressed, they are also evil.
Amanda
31st October 2018, 04:33 PM
https://govtslaves.info/2018/10/31/parents-of-the-creator-of-gab-are-terrorized-someone-turned-on-the-propane-tank-on-my-parents-gas-grill-turned-the-burner-on-and-let-the-propane-leak-out-this-is-terrorism-incited-by-the/
Parents of the creator of GAB are terrorized: Someone turned on the propane tank on my parent’s gas grill, turned the burner on, and let the propane leak out. This is terrorism, incited by the media. Pray for us.
madfranks
31st October 2018, 05:13 PM
So much for, "if you don't like facebook/twitter's policies, go start your own."
End Times
31st October 2018, 05:57 PM
So much for, "if you don't like facebook/twitter's policies, go start your own."
2015: the Left says, "corporations do not have human rights."
2018: the Left says, "they are private companies, they can censor whomever they want."
midnight rambler
31st October 2018, 06:03 PM
2015: the Left says, "corporations do not have human rights."
2018: the Left says, "they are private companies, they can censor whomever they want."
Moral relativism at its finest.
osoab
31st October 2018, 07:05 PM
So much for, "if you don't like facebook/twitter's policies, go start your own."
You should have read the finer print.
BrewTech
31st October 2018, 07:37 PM
You should have read the finer print.
I'm going to have a t-shirt made with that printed on it if you don't mind... :)
Neuro
1st November 2018, 02:12 AM
https://govtslaves.info/2018/10/31/parents-of-the-creator-of-gab-are-terrorized-someone-turned-on-the-propane-tank-on-my-parents-gas-grill-turned-the-burner-on-and-let-the-propane-leak-out-this-is-terrorism-incited-by-the/
Parents of the creator of GAB are terrorized: Someone turned on the propane tank on my parent’s gas grill, turned the burner on, and let the propane leak out. This is terrorism, incited by the media. Pray for us.
Modern day liberal freedom of speech...
If you provide a platform where anyone is able to express THEIR opinions, if one of those individuals then commit a heinous crime (which may even be a hoax), your site will then be turned off, and your family will be terrorized by our freedom fighters.
osoab
1st November 2018, 04:20 AM
I'm going to have a t-shirt made with that printed on it if you don't mind... :)
T-shirt away. You have to post pics.
Jewboo
4th November 2018, 03:38 PM
https://gab.ai/
Gab is back up this Sunday Afternoon
:)
Bigjon
4th November 2018, 03:44 PM
https://gab.ai/
Gab is back up this Sunday Afternoon
:)
Error 502
steyr_m
4th November 2018, 03:46 PM
Error 502
Worked for me.
steyr_m
4th November 2018, 03:48 PM
oops, spoke too soon. I have a 502 error also
midnight rambler
4th November 2018, 04:23 PM
Error 502
Ditto
Jewboo
4th November 2018, 04:33 PM
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1459023667420.gif
Just tried it at 4:31pm Mountain Time and it now works. Confirm that it wasn't working a half-hour ago...
:(??
End Times
4th November 2018, 06:12 PM
Both domains work for me. But there is an intermittent 502 on .ai. It's a Cloudflare issue. Just reload.
https://gab.com/
https://gab.ai/
Neuro
5th November 2018, 03:11 AM
I tried registrering as a user there didn’t work. All the potential usernames were taken.
End Times
5th November 2018, 01:11 PM
I tried registrering as a user there didn’t work. All the potential usernames were taken.
I was able to sign up a new account last night with no trouble. Second username choice worked (numbers added to the end).
Shami-Amourae
8th November 2018, 04:00 AM
Error 502
Use Gab.com instead. They bought the domain so are mostly abandoning the .ai site.
Shami-Amourae
8th November 2018, 04:02 AM
I was able to sign up a new account last night with no trouble. Second username choice worked (numbers added to the end).
Send me a PM or post your Gab usernames please.
Personally I try to separate everything I do as much as I can.
PatColo
21st November 2018, 07:50 AM
Openly anti-joo political candidate Patrick Little (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcAhXQl-YWTU9wzfm5R5t7g/videos), after being dumped by Gab is saying, dump Gab, he's going to Minds.com
97 min livestream, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjrzlBm-TeI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjrzlBm-TeI
End Times
21st November 2018, 01:13 PM
Openly anti-joo political candidate Patrick Little, after being dumped by Gab is saying, dump Gab, he's going to Minds.com
Gab's communication to him regarding his alleged doxxing on his blog:
https://littlerevolution.us/2018/11/20/banned-from-gab/
Most sites, including this one, GSUS, do not allow doxxing.
Doxxing only rarely serves a legitimate purpose, but in every case, it opens up the host to civil and possibly criminal liabilities...Andrew Anglin can tell you about that.
PatColo
21st November 2018, 09:28 PM
Gab's communication to him regarding his alleged doxxing on his blog:
https://littlerevolution.us/2018/11/20/banned-from-gab/
Most sites, including this one, GSUS, do not allow doxxing.
Doxxing only rarely serves a legitimate purpose, but in every case, it opens up the host to civil and possibly criminal liabilities...Andrew Anglin can tell you about that.
Gab's explanation was a little vague, given they didn't provide copies of the 'gabs' which sparked the termination of Little. Christopher Cantwell asked the right question, but Gab replied in legaleze. Would sure be curious to see those offending gabs.
hoarder
22nd November 2018, 05:39 AM
So how do you register at minds.com? I tried to "start a channel" whatever that means, but nothing happens when I click "submit".
PatColo
22nd November 2018, 09:41 AM
apparently kosher alt right princess (((Laura Loomer))) was banned from twatter, in a probable "AJ banned across big social media" publicity stunt, again.
https://twitter.com/Know_More_News/status/1065630346689953793
^ Adam's Loomer expose from May '18; 30 mins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEGj5s4TrLg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEGj5s4TrLg
Shami-Amourae
24th November 2018, 03:13 AM
There's no true free speech platforms outside of the darkweb (which almost no one uses.)
Gab isn't a free speech platform (they pretend to be), and they fold/cave to get rid of "radical" voices. One thing I've learned is that everyone on the Right cave, except for the dead ones who don't care about optics.
The benefit of Gab is I can generally say the shit I do without getting banned like I would on Twitter. I post highly controversial shit all the time and people love it. The censors/Commies/Jews are focused mainly on White racial identity since their #1 goal is to kill all White people.
I've actually came to realize that all of our problems are due to women having rights (specifically voting rights,) and have decided to make it my duty to make it abundantly clear women shouldn't ever be given rights post-1920 or any sort of power in society. Ideally return women's rights to before how they were before 1920 and things would be fine.
hoarder
24th November 2018, 07:05 AM
I've actually came to realize that all of our problems are due to women having rights (specifically voting rights,) and have decided to make it my duty to make it abundantly clear women shouldn't ever be given rights post-1920 or any sort of power in society. Ideally return women's rights to before how they were before 1920 and things would be fine.When Jews control the electronic voting machines in the majority of states, what does it matter who votes what?
"He who votes decides nothing. He who counts the votes decides everything." Josef Djugashvili Stalin
Jewboo
24th November 2018, 09:07 AM
I've actually came to realize that all of our problems are due to women having rights (specifically voting rights,) and have decided to make it my duty to make it abundantly clear women shouldn't ever be given rights post-1920 or any sort of power in society. Ideally return women's rights to before how they were before 1920 and things would be fine.
https://i.imgur.com/zTN62Lz.jpg
It's the jews lad. It has always been the jews. Women and non-Whites are just their weapons against us.
All of our problems are due to JEWS.
:rolleyes:
hoarder
24th November 2018, 10:15 AM
Jews like to pretend to one of us and put ideas in our heads that weaken us to their strategies. Could it be that controlled opposition has put these divisive ideas in Shami's head? How happy they would be if White men and White women stopped talking to each other and fought amongst themselves.
PatColo
24th November 2018, 10:26 AM
twatter un-suspended (((LL))) pretty quick, after ~1 day-- was supposed to be a 30 day ban, IIUC.
Laura Loomer, far-right activist, threatens lawsuit over Twitter suspension
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/23/laura-loomer-far-right-activist-threatens-lawsuit
Bigjon
24th November 2018, 11:15 AM
When Jews control the electronic voting machines in the majority of states, what does it matter who votes what?
"He who votes decides nothing. He who counts the votes decides everything." Josef Djugashvili Stalin
The anonymous vote is a trap. If you believe in your cause say so in the open and take the consequences of your action. Every voter listed along with his vote.
End Times
24th November 2018, 11:47 AM
I've actually came to realize that all of our problems are due to women having rights (specifically voting rights,) and have decided to make it my duty to make it abundantly clear women shouldn't ever be given rights post-1920 or any sort of power in society. Ideally return women's rights to before how they were before 1920 and things would be fine.
For the sake of argument, let's say your argument is correct.
Who gave them those rights? "The Jews" is the wrong answer.
If giving women rights was the mistake that brought down our civilization, then we must go back one step more to recognize the men who made that mistake were degenerate.
And so much for the "argument."
I'm not afraid of women having the rights our race has always accorded them, nor having voting rights. "Women shouldn't vote" is the position of latent homosexuals.
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/241521?journalCode=jmh
German Women and the Triumph of Hitler
Women voters are not the problem. Degenerate and defective voters are the problem. And that applies, of course, only when the votes are actually accurately counted.
End Times
24th November 2018, 11:51 AM
Jews like to pretend to one of us and put ideas in our heads that weaken us to their strategies. Could it be that controlled opposition has put these divisive ideas in Shami's head? How happy they would be if White men and White women stopped talking to each other and fought amongst themselves.
The Talmud is a leading collection of hatred for women, including revulsion at the holy process that brings forth the next generation.
https://www.amazon.com/Hole-Sheet-Orthodox-Hasidic-Judaism/dp/081840437X
The concept that women are merely "unclean pieces of meat" is direct from the Talmud.
End Times
24th November 2018, 11:51 AM
The anonymous vote is a trap. If you believe in your cause say so in the open and take the consequences of your action. Every voter listed along with his vote.
That would be the only form of "audit" that would eliminate vote fraud.
woodman
24th November 2018, 11:58 AM
For the sake of argument, let's say your argument is correct.
Who gave them those rights? "The Jews" is the wrong answer.
If giving women rights was the mistake that brought down our civilization, then we must go back one step more to recognize the men who made that mistake were degenerate.
And so much for the "argument."
I'm not afraid of women having the rights our race has always accorded them, nor having voting rights. "Women shouldn't vote" is the position of latent homosexuals.
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/241521?journalCode=jmh
German Women and the Triumph of Hitler
Women voters are not the problem. Degenerate and defective voters are the problem. And that applies, of course, only when the votes are actually accurately counted.
I disagree to a point. There are many wise females who should be given the right to their own destiny. Women as a whole are collectivist and tend toward wanting a strong provider. It is innate. Can you really argue that they are not as a rule, herd animals? They will immediately give their freedom over to a government that promises them power over males, whom they have been taught are the oppressors. It is the same with the brown third worlders. They come here because it is implicit that they will eventually overthrow the white 'man' and they will immediately reap the benefits of his civilization. The moment they walk across the border, instant democrat (communist).
woodman
24th November 2018, 04:55 PM
After some thought, I felt I had something to add to my reply. As far as voting goes, I don't believe the simple fact that one has reached the age of 21 should give them the right to vote. If voting were on the up and up and that is a big if, I believe the average American, be they white or black or shade between, be they brown, red or yellow, man or woman: Still, they should have some 'skin in the game'. That is, they should have a proven record of financial responsibility. It would not matter if rich or poor. I could envision many rich who would not be viable voters, especially if they had inherited their wealth. I can see many poor who have a track record of working hard and being responsible and thus having high merit as a voter. A person should have the capacity to reason and thus conclude what is a justified ballot cast. They should 'have' something they have worked hard for so they can be aware of property rights. I can even see a percentage of 'accrued merit' where a voter might only have 25% or 50% vested vote. Why should a bum who never worked for anything have as much voting rights as a person who gets up every day a slaves away to provide for a family?
In a right society, voting would be a sacred honor and jealously guarded. In this society it has become at best an empty, meaningless charade, at worst, a sick joke. I mean, really, who can you vote for with any chance of success except a sick, vapid fuck who being vetted by AIPAC and proffered by the Jewish media is bound only to do his Jewish masters bidding?
I don't know what the answer is but there has to be a better way than what we are doing. I know the founding fathers floated the idea of land ownership bestowing voting rights. I think they were on the right track.
cheka.
24th November 2018, 05:08 PM
ron paul's simple 'end the fed' is one solution. the free sh-t army would disappear. nyc.dc is not going to hand over sacks of gold/silver coin to illegals, deadwood, crackheads
those three words go a long looong way to curing a lot of the ills -- the fsa, the wars, the monetary subversion of elections nationwide, more...
agree with having to qualify to vote. there could be a list of ways to qualify. just being here isn't enough
Tumbleweed
24th November 2018, 05:20 PM
It's the jews lad. It has always been the jews. Women and non-Whites are just their weapons against us.
All of our problems are due to JEWS.
:rolleyes:
I agree and until we deal with those SOB's nothing is going to change. In the thread midnight rambler posted the video of Bibi speaking he tells us how they are vulnerable starting at about the 11:00 minute mark when he says "there are not very many of us".
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?99828-How-Deep-Is-Israeli-Penetration-Of-The-US-High-Tech-Sector
The guy that did this video below has some interesting thoughts on these problems we're seeing and I think it's worth watching.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig2SgfVLigQ
Jewboo
24th November 2018, 05:41 PM
...In a right society, voting would be a sacred honor and jealously guarded. In this society it has become at best an empty, meaningless charade, at worst, a sick joke. I mean, really, who can you vote for with any chance of success except a sick, vapid fuck who being vetted by AIPAC and proffered by the Jewish media is bound only to do his Jewish masters bidding?
https://s19453.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/netanyahuincongress.jpg https://i1.wp.com/historyreviewed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Jews-Congress-with-dual-Israeli-US-citizenship.jpg
https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2016/03/000_8Y9HW.jpg https://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/IMG/arton43755.jpg?1485017313
Shami-Amourae
24th November 2018, 11:23 PM
It's the jews lad. It has always been the jews. Women and non-Whites are just their weapons against us.
All of our problems are due to JEWS.
:rolleyes:
Jews are just direct and dictate the destruction. Similar issues where women have rights are happening (besides 3rd world immigration) where they vote. Birth rates are actually dropping in 3rd world countries now due to Feminism and some Feminist countries in South America are already importing Nigger "refugees" into their countries.
On top of that Feminist Jews in Israel are trying to import Africa into Israel. I'm telling you the problem is mostly women. If we didn't allow women to vote Jews wouldn't have shit power over us.
Soros had to stop funding Feminists in Israel since they were actually harming Jews.
https://dailystormer.name/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/femen-soros-israel.png
The first thing they do when taking over a country is give women rights since women value security over freedom. They are able to sell them their own destruction far easier than to men.
https://i.imgur.com/eojY5wR.jpg
Stop defending the Vaginal Jew.
Japan doesn't have a Jewish problem, but gave their women a right to vote. They live in an ethno state, sure, but they have legalized child porn (lolicon), and more degeneracy than in America. The only benefit is they don't have Niggers....FOR NOW.
https://ii.yuki.la/0/48/5c2faddac1cbac9927fabfdada8f3f67e9d32e8d7947117ccb ab3931702f3480.png
Iran actually has a similar problem despite being a strictly Islamic country. Unlike other Islamic countries they allow their women into the workplace, so their birthrates are as low as they are in Europe.
https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Israel-Demographic-Chart-Spengler-Article-e1422753656817.png
When you add women to the work place they put off having children in their most fertile years for pursuing a career. Once they have the career they are too old to have children so end up getting cats, then because their maternal instinct is screaming, demand to flood infinite Niggers in their country to fulfill their maternal instinct.
If you want to destroy a people fund Feminists in their country. We could literally wipe out Africa without firing a single shot. Just build girls schools and teach women to be strong and empowered and watch African birthrates drop to zero and degeneracy to go all over.
The whole reason this transgender thing is exploding right now is since beta males want a taste of female privilege since our gynocentric society hates men and worships women. Any White man can cut off their dick, wear and dress, and finally be "oppressed" and not be a 2nd class citizen in their own country anymore. This is all due to our societies insanity of worshiping women.
Shami-Amourae
25th November 2018, 12:19 AM
If giving women rights was the mistake that brought down our civilization, then we must go back one step more to recognize the men who made that mistake were degenerate.
A lot of Feminists back then were literal terrorists. They would chew out their husbands like crazy to the point to where they were like "FINE DEAR YOU CAN VOTE JUST SHUTUP." Wyoming was the first state to allow women to vote since they wanted people to move to the state, then everything followed from there.
"Women shouldn't vote" is the position of latent homosexuals
https://i.redd.it/mz7fl6lp79uz.jpg
The first story in the Bible is literally a man trusting a woman who got tricked by a snake. The snake couldn't trick the man, but the woman could trick the man for the snake, since the man wants his dick wet. This is an allegory to how Jews ruin the West by using women as their catalyst.
Women have only been voting from 100 years and since then Christianity is going extinct, and birth rates are complete shit.
http://www.marastrove.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IMG_20180618_081722_497.jpg
The first thing women did when they got the right to vote was ban alcohol since they knew that was the only relief men had from those bitching harpies. Look how well that turned out.
https://i.postimg.cc/8546BhsP/1526042169952.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/W1KGy629/1515331190947.png
Replace "Refugees Welcome" with "Votes for Women" and you've got the same thing as today.
Supporting women's right is suicide.
https://i.postimg.cc/90NwsCG6/1477435142318.jpg
hoarder
25th November 2018, 06:35 AM
Female behavior is somewhat predictable, i.e. vulnerability to power of suggestion, emotional, illogical....at least on average compared to men. Jews knew more power would fall in their hands if they "empowered" women to do their bidding.
Jew are well known to promote bad ideas and the women's vote was one they successfully implemented for their own purposes. Modern women's attitudes are the symptom, Jews are the cause.
Jewboo
25th November 2018, 09:56 AM
...Modern women's attitudes are the symptom, Jews are the cause.
http://msmagazine.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/10561794_10152606740658540_4843028826448630704_n.j pg
This. As I understand it, Shami has not lived with a woman except his mother. Some of us here have ex-wives and actual first hand experience. I remember the day my first ex-wife brought home the first issue of jew-created Ms. Magazine. She started yacking about woman's liberation so I liberated her for good. Women now get their feminist thoughts via television. It's the jews Shami...it's always been the jews...they have been called "Nation Wreckers (https://www.google.com/search?biw=1920&bih=879&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=rtL6W7XSNovRjgS0oZvgCg&q=Nation+Wreckers&oq=Nation+Wreckers&gs_l=img.12..0i24.296915.296915..299171...0.0..0.1 08.108.0j1......0....1j2..gws-wiz-img.5UqrQtfzLGc)" since forever.
:)
Jewboo
25th November 2018, 10:09 AM
On top of that Feminist Jews in Israel are trying..
WOMEN OF THE WALL (https://www.google.com/search?biw=1920&bih=879&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=r9X6W4CnGeipjwTjjqiQCQ&q=women+of+the+wall&oq=women+of+the+wall&gs_l=img.3..0l2.43676.48665..49263...0.0..0.112.17 81.1j16......0....1..gws-wiz-img.......0i67j0i8i30.oaU_d9txYnU)
Jew society in Israel does not actually tolerate much feminism. Women can't even pray at The Wall. Oy...
:rolleyes:
cheka.
25th November 2018, 11:31 AM
now we have one less xx leftist
Surveillance footage has been released showing the man approaching the woman who was talking to another customer at Tom's Drive-Thru store in North College Hill, near Cincinnati.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=ScLBg9Ej0MQ
Bigjon
25th November 2018, 12:05 PM
This. As I understand it, Shami has not lived with a woman except his mother. Some of us here have ex-wives and actual first hand experience. I remember the day my first ex-wife brought home the first issue of jew-created Ms. Magazine. She started yacking about woman's liberation so I liberated her for good. Women now get their feminist thoughts via television. It's the jews Shami...it's always been the jews...they have been called "Nation Wreckers (https://www.google.com/search?biw=1920&bih=879&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=rtL6W7XSNovRjgS0oZvgCg&q=Nation+Wreckers&oq=Nation+Wreckers&gs_l=img.12..0i24.296915.296915..299171...0.0..0.1 08.108.0j1......0....1j2..gws-wiz-img.5UqrQtfzLGc)" since forever.
:)
Excuse me, but I always thought Shami was a woman?
In the Dungeons & Dragons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_%26_Dragons) roleplaying game (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roleplaying_game), Shami-Amourae is a demon lord (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_lord_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)). She is supposedly the first of the succubi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succubus_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)) to come into being in the Abyss (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abyss_(plane)), along with her fellow "sister" succubi Lynkhab (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynkhab), Xinivrae (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Xinivrae&action=edit&redlink=1), and Malcanthet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcanthet). Whereas Xinivrae is concerned with the seduction of women and Lynkhab is patroness to the self-destructive, Shami-Amourae herself is concerned with debased sexuality
woodman
25th November 2018, 12:48 PM
Excuse me, but I always thought Shami was a woman?
In the Dungeons & Dragons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_%26_Dragons) roleplaying game (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roleplaying_game), Shami-Amourae is a demon lord (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_lord_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)). She is supposedly the first of the succubi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succubus_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)) to come into being in the Abyss (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abyss_(plane)), along with her fellow "sister" succubi Lynkhab (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynkhab), Xinivrae (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Xinivrae&action=edit&redlink=1), and Malcanthet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcanthet). Whereas Xinivrae is concerned with the seduction of women and Lynkhab is patroness to the self-destructive, Shami-Amourae herself is concerned with debased sexuality
I did for a long time also. It was the name as you point out.
End Times
25th November 2018, 04:24 PM
I disagree to a point. There are many wise females who should be given the right to their own destiny. Women as a whole are collectivist and tend toward wanting a strong provider. It is innate. Can you really argue that they are not as a rule, herd animals? They will immediately give their freedom over to a government that promises them power over males, whom they have been taught are the oppressors. It is the same with the brown third worlders. They come here because it is implicit that they will eventually overthrow the white 'man' and they will immediately reap the benefits of his civilization. The moment they walk across the border, instant democrat (communist).
God designed women as nurturers of their own children.
Our current society has turned most women into degenerates who murder their own children in the womb, do their damnedest to avoid becoming pregnant in the first place, and fuck Niggers, Spics and other subhumans.
Judging "women" across history by these evil degenerates is both unfair and grossly inaccurate. Our race's history is chock-full of women doing the right thing, even when the "men" failed. When imbued with their natural nature, they choose goodness and health. That said, women are, of course, the master of the household, men the master of the greater world.
I would respectfully suggest that succumbing to the Jew-loaded term "collectivist" is a key to error in your thinking. God designed all peoples to be "collectivist"...or, what Satan's Chosen call "tribalist" or "nationalist" in the most condescending way. The issue is not being "collectivist," but misdirecting God's designed nature towards mundane, profane, or perverted ends.
The leading (((libertarians))) [e.g., the (((Austrian))) school of ideology] who use "collectivist" in a manner of contempt all come from the world's most notorious "collectivist" tribe - who have conquered the world because of that "collectivism." "Individualism" for the Goyim, unbending loyalty to the Master Race for them. Atomism of Jewry's enemies - isolating Goyim into individuals from their God-appointed extended families - is the key tactic in defeating us.
God help Aryan men to start learning to be "collectivist."
End Times
25th November 2018, 04:33 PM
After some thought, I felt I had something to add to my reply. As far as voting goes, I don't believe the simple fact that one has reached the age of 21 should give them the right to vote. If voting were on the up and up and that is a big if, I believe the average American, be they white or black or shade between, be they brown, red or yellow, man or woman: Still, they should have some 'skin in the game'. That is, they should have a proven record of financial responsibility. It would not matter if rich or poor. I could envision many rich who would not be viable voters, especially if they had inherited their wealth. I can see many poor who have a track record of working hard and being responsible and thus having high merit as a voter. A person should have the capacity to reason and thus conclude what is a justified ballot cast. They should 'have' something they have worked hard for so they can be aware of property rights. I can even see a percentage of 'accrued merit' where a voter might only have 25% or 50% vested vote. Why should a bum who never worked for anything have as much voting rights as a person who gets up every day a slaves away to provide for a family?
In a right society, voting would be a sacred honor and jealously guarded. In this society it has become at best an empty, meaningless charade, at worst, a sick joke. I mean, really, who can you vote for with any chance of success except a sick, vapid fuck who being vetted by AIPAC and proffered by the Jewish media is bound only to do his Jewish masters bidding?
I don't know what the answer is but there has to be a better way than what we are doing. I know the founding fathers floated the idea of land ownership bestowing voting rights. I think they were on the right track.
Intelligence and knowledge testing is absolutely essential in a society where the electorate actually chooses the course of that society. Most modern Whites just wouldn't cut it, let alone the non-White imbeciles. If you don't know the most important event of American history in 1776, or at least two rights secured by the First Amendment, you have no business voting. This would exclude nearly all of the ne'er do wells, in addition to the well-off but still stupid citizenry.
I oppose land ownership being a criterion, until (((land speculation))) is permanently eradicated.
End Times
25th November 2018, 04:35 PM
I agree and until we deal with those SOB's nothing is going to change. In the thread midnight rambler posted the video of Bibi speaking he tells us how they are vulnerable starting at about the 11:00 minute mark when he says "there are not very many of us".
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?99828-How-Deep-Is-Israeli-Penetration-Of-The-US-High-Tech-Sector
The guy that did this video below has some interesting thoughts on these problems we're seeing and I think it's worth watching.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig2SgfVLigQ
I appreciate the points, but I would title it, "How Women Manipulated Into Degeneracy Weaken Nations."
"And why men let them" is just as important as the Oprah Nation's role.
hoarder
25th November 2018, 04:36 PM
God designed women as nurturers of their own children.
Our current society has turned most women into degenerates who murder their own children in the womb, do their damnedest to avoid becoming pregnant in the first place, and fuck Niggers, Spics and other subhumans.
Judging "women" across history by these evil degenerates is both unfair and grossly inaccurate. Our race's history is chock-full of women doing the right thing, even when the "men" failed. When imbued with their natural nature, they choose goodness and health. That said, women are, of course, the master of the household, men the master of the greater world.
I would respectfully suggest that succumbing to the Jew-loaded term "collectivist" is a key to error in your thinking. God designed all peoples to be "collectivist"...or, what Satan's Chosen call "tribalist" or "nationalist" in the most condescending way. The issue is not being "collectivist," but misdirecting God's designed nature towards mundane, profane, or perverted ends.
The leading (((libertarians))) [e.g., the (((Austrian))) school of ideology] who use "collectivist" in a manner of contempt all come from the world's most notorious "collectivist" tribe - who have conquered the world because of that "collectivism." "Individualism" for the Goyim, unbending loyalty to the Master Race for them. Atomism of Jewry's enemies - isolating Goyim into individuals from their God-appointed extended families - is the key tactic in defeating us.
God help Aryan men to start learning to be "collectivist."The term "collectivist" doesn't specify whether it applies to the population in general or sub groups within. Modern usage implies the former, therefore I'm very careful to specify which kind of collectivism I would refer to. To me it generally means Marxism. The kind you refer to I would call "cohesion".
The next distinction the word "collectivism" doesn't draw is whether it applies to economic collectivism or simply collectivists looking out for their common good.
Economic collectivism, even within the ingroup is not healthy, it's disgenic.
What do you have against land speculation?
End Times
25th November 2018, 04:37 PM
https://i1.wp.com/historyreviewed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Jews-Congress-with-dual-Israeli-US-citizenship.jpg
We could remove everyone one of those mother fuckers, and still have this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BznP1xTCb0
The Iranians have spread a rumor that Mossad has proof Graham is a secret queer...and use it to keep him in line on Jewry's dogma.
End Times
25th November 2018, 04:41 PM
If we didn't allow women to vote Jews wouldn't have shit power over us.
Women gained the right to vote in the USA in 1919.
Men voted to murder our racial brothers in the Confederate States of America in 1860.
Shami, you sure you're not a latent homosexual?
End Times
25th November 2018, 04:53 PM
The first story in the Bible is literally a man trusting a woman who got tricked by a snake. The snake couldn't trick the man, but the woman could trick the man for the snake, since the man wants his dick wet. This is an allegory to how Jews ruin the West by using women as their catalyst.
Glad you acknowledge this. Adam wasn't keen on following Yahweh's perfectly clear commandment - the only thing Yahweh God prohibited him from doing - and did what Eve suggested. But Eve's the problem?
Yes, Jews use women - by manipulating them just as their father the Devil (the serpent) did in the Garden. But men have swallowed Jewish schlong for centuries! Women didn't allow Jews back into the lands that wisely kicked them out. Women didn't "free the slaves."
"Women shouldn't vote" is part of the latent faggot "men's rights movement" being pushed by Jews to divide White men from women.
Women have only been voting from 100 years and since then Christianity is going extinct, and birth rates are complete shit.
Sexual degenerates like Nietzsche were "working on" Christianity long before 1919.
Women leaders like Susan B. Anthony publicly abhorred abortion, while simultaneously pleading for her right to vote. Who created the Suicide Pill (aka "Birth Control" Pill)? NOT WOMEN! A Jew, actually. Who "legalized" pre-born infanticide? NOT WOMEN.
The first thing women did when they got the right to vote was ban alcohol since they knew that was the only relief men had from those bitching harpies.
I'm sorry you're not man enough to handle it.
My wife is my Prime Minister, head of government. She has full-reign of the home...until she doesn't. I'm the President, head of state. I exercise my rule justly and wisely. I don't order her around for my whims. I guide her on affairs she doesn't understand and/or requests my help with. When she is "whiny," I just chalk it up to hormones - which it is. It's part of being a husband! Love one's wife as oneself. I expect her to love and comfort me when I am sick. When she is hormonal, that's reciprocation. You seem to suffer from the Jewish media's image of a wife being your servant (a meme the "feminists" peddle).
Good for the suffragettes on campaigning against the (mostly-Jewish) liquor industry! Henry Ford exposed (((who))) were the kings of liquor. These women - and millions of men also in the Temperance Movement - were doing God's work. Who overturned alcohol prohibition (while prohibiting Goyim from owning gold)? A key leader in favor of the 21st Amendment? The wife of (((Charles H. Sabin))): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauline_Sabin. And John D. Rockefeller, Jr.
End Times
25th November 2018, 05:01 PM
Female behavior is somewhat predictable, i.e. vulnerability to power of suggestion, emotional, illogical....at least on average compared to men. Jews knew more power would fall in their hands if they "empowered" women to do their bidding.
Jew are well known to promote bad ideas and the women's vote was one they successfully implemented for their own purposes. Modern women's attitudes are the symptom, Jews are the cause.
Men refused to do their duty and make sure Satan's chosen never got their hands on the controls of mass media. The Serpents beguiling the Daughters of Eve was a logical consequence.
End Times
25th November 2018, 05:05 PM
Excuse me, but I always thought Shami was a woman?
In the Dungeons & Dragons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_%26_Dragons) roleplaying game (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roleplaying_game), Shami-Amourae is a demon lord (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_lord_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)). She is supposedly the first of the succubi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succubus_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)) to come into being in the Abyss (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abyss_(plane)), along with her fellow "sister" succubi Lynkhab (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynkhab), Xinivrae (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Xinivrae&action=edit&redlink=1), and Malcanthet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcanthet). Whereas Xinivrae is concerned with the seduction of women and Lynkhab is patroness to the self-destructive, Shami-Amourae herself is concerned with debased sexuality
"Our" Shami is the proprietor of an online pornographic role-playing arena where anything goes. Normally such things are the purvey of Jews in the San Fernando Valley.
End Times
25th November 2018, 05:13 PM
The term "collectivist" doesn't specify whether it applies to the population in general or sub groups within. Modern usage implies the former, therefore I'm very careful to specify which kind of collectivism I would refer to. To me it generally means Marxism. The kind you refer to I would call "cohesion".
The next distinction the word "collectivism" doesn't draw is whether it applies to economic collectivism or simply collectivists looking out for their common good.
The trouble is Jews have co-opted "collectivism" to encompass anything that is not "individualism." Marxism, National Socialism, generic nationalism, generic tribalism, even loving one's extended family. Shabbos Goyim like Alex Jones harp on "collectivism" routinely.
The Kosher spectrum of permissible "thought" has incorporated such buzzwords (as well as "socialism") for those who think they are "on the right" (so-called "conservatives").
Economic collectivism, even within the ingroup is not healthy, it's disgenic.
That's certainly up for debate.
Anything less than total anarchism is "collectivism" of a degree.
Do we have a basic government, run by our own kind, providing "socialized" military force and "socialized" fire protection? Do we have speculation in essential modern services (e.g., electricity, natural gas, water, telecommunications, health care), or a degree of so-called "socialism" to assure that a corrupt elite does not seize control of such things for their economic benefit?
What do you have against land speculation?
It's inherently a Jewish thing. Turning a gift from God into a commodity, reducing the foundation of prosperity (e.g., food production) to mammon.
I know you think Hitler was a Jew, but I'm firmly committed to Point 17 of the Program of the NSDAP (that includes abolition of taxes on non-speculated land).
Shami-Amourae
25th November 2018, 07:44 PM
WOMEN OF THE WALL (https://www.google.com/search?biw=1920&bih=879&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=r9X6W4CnGeipjwTjjqiQCQ&q=women+of+the+wall&oq=women+of+the+wall&gs_l=img.3..0l2.43676.48665..49263...0.0..0.112.17 81.1j16......0....1..gws-wiz-img.......0i67j0i8i30.oaU_d9txYnU)
Jew society in Israel does not actually tolerate much feminism. Women can't even pray at The Wall. Oy...
:rolleyes:
Watch this documentary on Feminism in Israel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahZTWBB26Cw
Jewboo
25th November 2018, 08:07 PM
Watch this documentary on Feminism in Israel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahZTWBB26Cw
Persuasive video Shami. I stand corrected.
:)
hoarder
25th November 2018, 08:14 PM
The trouble is Jews have co-opted "collectivism" to encompass anything that is not "individualism." Marxism, National Socialism, generic nationalism, generic tribalism, even loving one's extended family. Shabbos Goyim like Alex Jones harp on "collectivism" routinely.
The Kosher spectrum of permissible "thought" has incorporated such buzzwords (as well as "socialism") for those who think they are "on the right" (so-called "conservatives").
That's certainly up for debate.
Anything less than total anarchism is "collectivism" of a degree.
Do we have a basic government, run by our own kind, providing "socialized" military force and "socialized" fire protection? Do we have speculation in essential modern services (e.g., electricity, natural gas, water, telecommunications, health care), or a degree of so-called "socialism" to assure that a corrupt elite does not seize control of such things for their economic benefit?
Common usage defines words to some degree. "Collectivism" and "socialism are dirty words now. They isolate us from the rest of our race and that serves Shlomo. Lets use substitute words like cohesion.
It's inherently a Jewish thing. Turning a gift from God into a commodity, reducing the foundation of prosperity (e.g., food production) to mammon.
I know you think Hitler was a Jew, but I'm firmly committed to Point 17 of the Program of the NSDAP (that includes abolition of taxes on non-speculated land).First of all, there is no clear distinction between speculated and non-speculated land. The grey area covers most of the territory. Second, in the human realm, nearly everything has a price one way or another. There isn't any way around it. Half the land in the country is not suitable for food production. Lots of it is hunting land, recreational land, timber land and residential land as well as any combination of the above. Mine is all of those.
keehah
28th October 2019, 12:04 PM
New service from Gab: https://trends.gab.com/
It is being described as a crowd sourced Drudge Report.
PatColo
28th October 2019, 12:33 PM
apparently kosher alt right princess (((Laura Loomer))) was banned from twatter, in a probable "AJ banned across big social media" publicity stunt, again.
https://twitter.com/Know_More_News/status/1065630346689953793
^ Adam's Loomer expose from May '18; 30 mins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEGj5s4TrLg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEGj5s4TrLg
^ the 26yo JAP-ho-bag has a good shot at becoming new FL congressperp... running on a populist "fighting (((big tech))) censorship" slogan, AS IF!! :rolleyes:
https://lauraloomerforcongress.com/
^ needs our big contributions though, you know, david/golieth sitch going on & all!
Shami-Amourae
9th June 2021, 03:26 PM
https://twitter.com/KeithWoodsYT/status/1402542643079532546
https://torako.wakarimasen.moe/file/torako/pol/image/1623/26/1623263575660.jpg
Amanda
9th June 2021, 03:56 PM
https://twitter.com/KeithWoodsYT/status/1402542643079532546
https://torako.wakarimasen.moe/file/torako/pol/image/1623/26/1623263575660.jpg
Totally NOT surprised!
Dachsie
25th July 2021, 10:42 AM
https://twitter.com/GovAbbott/status/1369822393678594061?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5 Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1369822393678594061%7Ctwgr% 5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usasupreme.com%2Fgreg-abbott-calls-gab-antisemitic-and-propose-legislation-to-end-the-social-network-gabs-response-humiliate-the-republican-governor-video%2F
https://twitter.com/GovAbbott/status/1369822393678594061?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5 Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1369822393678594061%7Ctwgr% 5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usasupreme.com%2Fgreg-abbott-calls-gab-antisemitic-and-propose-legislation-to-end-the-social-network-gabs-response-humiliate-the-republican-governor-video%2F
Gab CEO, (CEO) Andrew Torba, is our finest exemplar of what the First Amendment and true Free Speech is really all about.
Very sad to see my Texas governor calling Gab "anti-semitic."
Let's see if Governor Abbott gets serious about the plandemic / vaccine Satanic hoax
and
gets serious about truly enforcing the Texas border, the entire boundaries of the Great State of Texas, against entry of illegal aliens,
or
will it just me more posturing and play acting by entire Texas state government.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.