PDA

View Full Version : When is 7th_trump going to leave again?



palani
25th December 2016, 08:36 PM
I predict departure before New Years.

7th trump
25th December 2016, 08:50 PM
I predict departure before New Years.
Your not as favored as you think you are.
Many here dont believe in your bullshit Palani. Notice they are starting to ask the questions I asked you.
Your last escapade didnt end so well for you after an individual asked you if the law you were referring to was foreign.
At least you responded in some truth by saying it was foreign...and it ended right there.

It was classic!

Joshua01
25th December 2016, 08:51 PM
Welcome back 7th!

palani
25th December 2016, 09:06 PM
the law you were referring to was foreign

The several States are foreign to each other except for those domestic laws agreed to by U.S.constitution.

Wouldn't someone with your superior mental skills would know that?

7th trump
25th December 2016, 09:14 PM
The several States are foreign to each other except for those domestic laws agreed to by U.S.constitution.

Wouldn't someone with your superior mental skills would know that?

Yes thats elementary....seriously so what big deal!
So why do you beleive any law from a foreign king that had territory rights roughly 400 years ago has any standing today after said king relinquished title of said territory which is now part of the USofA thats currently recognized by said foreign country of said ancient dead king and said land is now settled internationally as the USofA has any lawful binding today?

7th trump
25th December 2016, 09:18 PM
The several States are foreign to each other except for those domestic laws agreed to by U.S.constitution.

Wouldn't someone with your superior mental skills would know that?

Typical non answer.

cheka.
25th December 2016, 09:38 PM
Yes thats elementary....seriously so what big deal!
So why do you beleive any law from a foreign king that had territory rights roughly 400 years ago has any standing today after said king relinquished title of said territory which is now part of the USofA thats currently recognized by said foreign country of said ancient dead king and said land is now settled internationally as the USofA has any lawful binding today?

didnt it relinquish its power to the people? not the gov?

7th trump
25th December 2016, 10:37 PM
didnt it relinquish its power to the people? not the gov?

The People gave the power over territories to the federal government to deal with until said territories became union States (several states).

Hillbilly
26th December 2016, 01:34 AM
And like Zombie Jebus (only in hollywood movies) briefcase bible boy returns.

crimethink
26th December 2016, 03:25 AM
I don't like palani and believe most of what he posts is utter bullshit, but I still have a minimal degree of respect for him. He at least tries to present reasoned arguments, even if they're, well, crap.

The other one? Just a troll.

Give him the rope...he'll hang himself, again.

palani
26th December 2016, 05:23 AM
So why do you beleive any law from a foreign king that had territory rights roughly 400 years ago has any standing today after said king relinquished title of said territory which is now part of the USofA thats currently recognized by said foreign country of said ancient dead king and said land is now settled internationally as the USofA has any lawful binding today?

Wow! I am in AWE! I don't believe I could construct a sentence that long and still not say anything.

Territory attaches to municipalities. Law attaches to people.

Common law is LEX NON SCRIPTA. It is never written. As soon as it is written it is not common law. As soon as it is SPOKEN it is common law. You have never seen me write about common law and I doubt if you have ever heard me speak on the subject.

Chew on that for a bit. In the mean time I hope this satisfies your need to disbelieve everything I write.

palani
26th December 2016, 05:25 AM
Typical non answer.


https://youtu.be/E6ADGIHIKnI

7th trump
26th December 2016, 08:10 AM
Wow! I am in AWE! I don't believe I could construct a sentence that long and still not say anything.

Territory attaches to municipalities. Law attaches to people.

Common law is LEX NON SCRIPTA. It is never written. As soon as it is written it is not common law. As soon as it is SPOKEN it is common law. You have never seen me write about common law and I doubt if you have ever heard me speak on the subject.

Chew on that for a bit. In the mean time I hope this satisfies your need to disbelieve everything I write.

Hahahahahaha....
So Common law is never written huh?

Then I guess the Articles of Confederation and shortly afterwards the US Constitution were never Common Law....nor are the majority of state constitutions.


Ohhh come on old foolish one.......where do you get the crazy idea that "Territory attaches to municipalities. Law attaches to people." bullshit?
Territories are a land mass.
Municipalities are......The English word "Municipality" derives from the Latin social contract municipium (derived from a word meaning duty holders).....made up in mans head.

7th trump
26th December 2016, 08:17 AM
Wow! I am in AWE! I don't believe I could construct a sentence that long and still not say anything.

Territory attaches to municipalities. Law attaches to people.

Common law is LEX NON SCRIPTA. It is never written. As soon as it is written it is not common law. As soon as it is SPOKEN it is common law. You have never seen me write about common law and I doubt if you have ever heard me speak on the subject.

Chew on that for a bit. In the mean time I hope this satisfies your need to disbelieve everything I write.

Stay on topic old foolish man....what makes you believe that a 400 year old foreign dead old kings words have any effect today on a land that said dead 400 year old foreign king relinquished rights to the People of the USofA who took control over?
You posted some ancient law as if it had any legal standing in America today and when someone questioned that ancient law it turns out its from a dead foreign king.....you arent being honest...you are a liar and disinformationist.

palani
26th December 2016, 08:26 AM
Then I guess the Articles of Confederation and shortly afterwards the US Constitution were never Common Law....nor are the majority of state constitutions.
BINGO! ding ding ding! WE HAVE A WINNER HERE FOLKS!


Territories are a land mass
Begs the question: "What is land?"


"Municipality" derives from the Latin social contract municipium (derived from a word meaning duty holders)
Wrong. A municipality is the officers representing the legal fiction.


what makes you believe that a 400 year old foreign dead old kings words have any effect today on a land In our law conditions annexed to conveyances never expire no matter how many hands the property pass through. Check to see if you can find anything that might be classed a conveyance and check to see what conditions are annexed to that conveyance. Or as an alternative you may dishonor your ancestors. Your choice.


you are a liar and disinformationist
Hang in there, buddy. You got to make it to New Years before being banned again.

7th trump
26th December 2016, 10:09 AM
BINGO! ding ding ding! WE HAVE A WINNER HERE FOLKS!


Begs the question: "What is land?"


Wrong. A municipality is the officers representing the legal fiction.

In our law conditions annexed to conveyances never expire no matter how many hands the property pass through. Check to see if you can find anything that might be classed a conveyance and check to see what conditions are annexed to that conveyance. Or as an alternative you may dishonor your ancestors. Your choice.


Hang in there, buddy. You got to make it to New Years before being banned again.
Funny thing about your theory that common law isnt written....legal scholars who dont bite the conspiracy turd to sense its nasty taste say the US constitution and the Articles are both common law documents...so much for your delusional theories....you can throw that theory into the same pile (the shit pile) I tossed your completely delusional theory that the 2nd amendment is supposed to be interpreted as a family name. I had a lawyer friend that I had read your statement about that and she damn near choked on her wine in laughter. Hey remember that one time you thought a coroner was the law of the land? Then I asked a deputy sheriff about that and she smiled and laughed too and said you have to discern the nutcases from the rest....remember that?

Municipalities are officers now huh?
No supportive documentation...as usual!

And heres a conspiracy nutcase classic...dont know what "land" is now huh?
How convenient you mysteriously cant remember what "land" is now....bahahahaha!
Have you been revisiting Bill Clinton's "define what "is" is" to try and sneak your bullshit through?

Conveyance?
You mean a how long dead and gone foreign king relinquished said territory to the People of the Several States?
How about getting their asses kicked completely out of the country militarily.
Or even the territory being purchased from the claimant.

If you have something to say about a conveyance to said territory then come out and say it otherwise I'll take it that you dont have a damn clue to go to the point in the first damn place.
I suspect you never stopped playing your damn foolish word games.
I'll give you this old foolish one.....you are beginning to come around. I'm molding you into not reverting to internet conspiracy by debunking every conspiracy you dig out from the internets....your pool of nutcase conspiracy theories is diminishing so soon than later you'll have to face reality....or just shut the fuck up altogether. Either one I'm good with.

palani
26th December 2016, 02:33 PM
US constitution and the Articles are both common law documents

Idiot. Erie Railroad decision says the U.S. has no common law of its' own.

So bite me.

7th trump
26th December 2016, 03:22 PM
Idiot. Erie Railroad decision says the U.S. has no common law of its' own.

So bite me.

I'm pretty sure the idiot here is you palani.....heck I'm with out a doubt its you.


American common law

The United States and most Commonwealth countries are heirs to the common law legal tradition of English law.[22] Certain practices traditionally allowed under English common law were expressly outlawed by the Constitution, such as bills of attainder[23] and general search warrants.[24]

As common law courts, U.S. courts have inherited the principle of stare decisis.[25] American judges, like common law judges elsewhere, not only apply the law, they also make the law, to the extent that their decisions in the cases before them become precedent for decisions in future cases.[26]

http://www.svpvril.com/OACL.html


For instance, the Constitution of the State of Iowa, Article V, Section 6, states, in part, as follows:

"The District Court shall be a court of law and equity, which shall be distinct and separate jurisdictions, . . . ."


The Common Law was recognized by Our Founding Fathers and is the basis of all law in America today.


This law school even has a course on the American common law.
http://www.law.unc.edu/academics/courses/uscommonlaw/


But somehow in your conspiracy delusional mind the Erie case has in one swoop destroyed and eliminated the Common law in the USofA....thats what you are implying anyway.

The idiot is you palani...you just haven't realized it yet because conspiracy has infected your outlook on just about everything.

On a side note no the US doesnt have a common law of its own....it has adopted the english common law form, like many other nations have. Now dont get all excited thinking we as a country are nothing but an extention of england and the king still rules over us for adopting that common law form. The US has specifically forbidden certain legal practices of England within the common law jurisdiction. This seperates the US from England in many many ways.
I just needed to add this so you wouldnt get all stupid on go down that street because thats another conspiracy theory bouncing around the internets that I know you have latched onto.

palani
26th December 2016, 04:24 PM
But somehow in your conspiracy delusional mind the Erie case has in one swoop destroyed and eliminated the Common law in the USofA....thats what you are implying anyway.
No ... that's what the Supreme Court of the U.S. of A. is STATING.

But if you want to believe in Santa Claus and a U.S.of A. common law who am I to stand in the way of your fantasy? Your lack of imagination has doomed you to a lifetime of stripping phone cable and punching them down. That is enough of a penalty as far as I am concerned.

http://www.virtual-history.com/movie/photo/01/large/00076.jpg

7th trump
26th December 2016, 05:39 PM
No ... that's what the Supreme Court of the U.S. of A. is STATING.

But if you want to believe in Santa Claus and a U.S.of A. common law who am I to stand in the way of your fantasy? Your lack of imagination has doomed you to a lifetime of stripping phone cable and punching them down. That is enough of a penalty as far as I am concerned.

http://www.virtual-history.com/movie/photo/01/large/00076.jpg

So are you ever going to provide a link to this court case or are we to just take the word of a delusional and imaginative conspiracy nutball such as yourself?

Lack of imagination huh?
Do you think its a good practice to use your imagination when dealing with legality?
Ive never come across any lawyer or anyone in the legal field promote using your imagination when dealing with law. No room for error from imagination in law or the court room...dumb move...real dumb move!
But its nice to peek into your brain and see that you totally think its ok to use your imagination in legal land....it explains a lot about your unfounded posts.

palani
26th December 2016, 07:24 PM
Lack of imagination huh?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_Railroad_Co._v._Tompkins

7th trump
26th December 2016, 07:33 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_Railroad_Co._v._Tompkins

OMG!
You didnt read it did you?

Here you go....now read it.

Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), is a landmark[1] decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that federal courts did not have the judicial power to create general federal common law when hearing state law claims under diversity jurisdiction. In reaching this holding, the Court overturned almost a century of federal civil procedure case law, and established the foundation of what remains the modern law of diversity jurisdiction as it applies to United States federal courts.

Anything strike you odd?
It took me about 5 seconds to see it.
Here I'll get to the point......."federal common law"....lol...isnt the same as "Common law".

How you can show your face around here is beyond me....no shame or wanting t oimprove yourself.
This is what I mean about your sickness of injecting conspiracy where none exists.

Your whole being and drive is about uncovering a conspiracy when the truth is right in front of you like an elephant in a tiny room.

palani
26th December 2016, 08:03 PM
"federal common law"....lol...isnt the same as "Common law".

And your goofy ideas are available for all the world to see. Would you point to me a source or cite that says COMMON LAW, Common Law, COmmON lAW and common law are different?

Now could you point me to a source that says your ex-wifes' common law is different from YOUR common law or your NEIGHBORS common law?

There is no FEDERAL common law. If so then there is no constitutional SOURCE for federal common law. Since ALL state constitutions are modeled after the federal constitution that means there is no STATE common law.

Are you beginning to see why common law principles aren't recognized in court any more?

All common law is relegated to is cohabiting type marriages.

7th trump
26th December 2016, 08:45 PM
And your goofy ideas are available for all the world to see. Would you point to me a source or cite that says COMMON LAW, Common Law, COmmON lAW and common law are different?

Now could you point me to a source that says your ex-wifes' common law is different from YOUR common law or your NEIGHBORS common law?

There is no FEDERAL common law. If so then there is no constitutional SOURCE for federal common law. Since ALL state constitutions are modeled after the federal constitution that means there is no STATE common law.

Are you beginning to see why common law principles aren't recognized in court any more?

All common law is relegated to is cohabiting type marriages.

Wow!
Upset that I caught you in another conspiracy....hehehehehe!

Nope there is no federal common law...but only a fool would think the Common law is federal common law.
Heres something to think about palani....when the common law was in its infancy and getting established roughly 600 plus years ago was the "federal common law" the US courts abolished in existence?
Do the math palani...the math, its not difficult.

"We the People" are within the jurisdiction of the common law....US citizens are not. US citizens are subjects of Congress where Roman Civil statutory law reigns. This is why the courts today do not really recognize the common law these morons want the courts to think they stand in.
You arent smart enough to connect the dots are you? What a shame really, but then again that's what fools deserve for allowing themselves to be fooled by...who else...yourself!
The devil has a strong influence over you.....but then again you like believing in lies. I can only imagine the devils voice is that of a beautiful harp for anyone to believe in lies and unfounded conspiracy.

palani
26th December 2016, 09:08 PM
then again you like believing in lies.

You still here? Aren't you past due to get banned again?

7th trump
26th December 2016, 10:01 PM
You still here? Aren't you past due to get banned again?

Banned for what?
Are you another crimethink? You are like him and get all cry baby like and complain to the admins that someone put your ass in its place.
What big tuff intelligent guy cries to admins demanding a banning because he was told to sit down and shut up?
Crimethink is like you...doesnt like to be shown a fool that he is. His ego is huge from pretending to being the all knowing loud mouth of the class room.

Theres a huge difference between being intelligent and witty. Crimethink is more witty than being intelligent. Just pay close attention to Crimethinks bullshit...its 65% witty and 35% intelligence.
Hes the guy that added water to the wine to fool his father.

palani
27th December 2016, 04:59 AM
Banned for what?
For that is the character you have established for yourself.

crimethink
27th December 2016, 08:07 PM
Banned for what?


For being a troll.



You are like him and get all cry baby like and complain to the admins that someone put your ass in its place.


Let the record show I did not "complain to the admins." I made an open post suggesting you be banned like any other spammer. A mod saw that post, and agreed with it.

Indeed, you are a spammer. You contribute nothing to this forum. I'll say that again: NOTHING. I'd bet you are the single poster most "ignored" by members here.



His ego is huge from pretending to being the all knowing loud mouth of the class room.


LOL




Theres a huge difference between being intelligent and witty. Crimethink is more witty than being intelligent. Just pay close attention to Crimethinks bullshit...its 65% witty and 35% intelligence.


LOL




Hes the guy that added water to the wine to fool his father.

You are the guy that promised to stand by Him until the end, but then sold your honor and soul for 30 pieces of silver to give to the Satan-supporting IBEW.

7th trump
27th December 2016, 08:17 PM
For being a troll.




Let the record show I did not "complain to the admins." I made an open post suggesting you be banned like any other spammer. A mod saw that post, and agreed with it.

Indeed, you are a spammer. You contribute nothing to this forum. I'll say that again: NOTHING. I'd bet you are the single poster most "ignored" by members here.




LOL




LOL




You are the guy that promised to stand by Him until the end, but then sold your honor and soul for 30 pieces of silver to give to the Satan-supporting IBEW.

But you did complain by open posting I get banned!
Only an idiot would say ya didnt complain...just what do you think open posting I get banned is?
A compliment or a complaint?
Never mind you're too stupid to know the difference otherwise you wouldnt have made such an idiotic post.

I do stand by Him...more than you ever have!

I literally read your posts and know I have forgotten more about the Bible than you'll ever know.

I get more views than you do with the little threads I post in.
When I post in a thread it jumps by the 100's of views in a matter of hours....you?....bahahahaha!
You dont get that kind of following.

Your 30% intelligent and 70% witty...nothing more!

crimethink
27th December 2016, 08:38 PM
When I post in a thread it jumps by the 100's of views in a matter of hours....you?....bahahahaha!
You dont get that kind of following.

A legend in his own mind.

And, too stupid to realize he just admitted to being a troll.

Hitch
27th December 2016, 08:41 PM
I do stand by Him...more than you ever have!

I literally read your posts and know I have forgotten more about the Bible than you'll ever know.

Well, you are both Christians, right? This is the problem, you'd rather fight each other than face the fact that Islam is out to destroy Christianity altogether, alongside our culture and once great nation.

You need to focus and calm down. Hope you had a nice Christmas. I sincerely mean that.

crimethink
27th December 2016, 08:59 PM
you'd rather fight each other

I'd rather fight no one. But some people insist on being malevolent.

7th trump
27th December 2016, 09:06 PM
I'd rather fight no one. But some people insist on being malevolent.
Rolling my eyes because if you really wanted to not fight then you wouldn't have come out of the blue and replied to a post that was between myself and another?

So I say you arent as sly as you think you are. Manipulating yes, intelligent ...no!
People are catching onto you.
You like control thats for sure and dont like it when someone questions you....like I have which prompted you to open post for my banning.

midnight rambler
27th December 2016, 09:41 PM
Well, you are both Christians, right?

Pete, Communists' philosophy precludes them from accepting Jesus 'cause a Communist's god is the state.

Neuro
27th December 2016, 10:33 PM
Rolling my eyes because if you really wanted to not fight then you wouldn't have come out of the blue and replied to a post that was between myself and another?

So I say you arent as sly as you think you are. Manipulating yes, intelligent ...no!
People are catching onto you.
You like control thats for sure and dont like it when someone questions you....like I have which prompted you to open post for my banning.

The post you replied to was between Hitch and crimethink, so I guess your feeble attempt at character assasination is directed mostly towards yourself. You really are a superior idiot!

This is a discussion forum, which means that everyone is FREE to comment on anything said between two members here, something practically everyone has realized, apart from you Forrest, I suppose you're a bit slow?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADHXahsxIGM&feature=share

Neuro
28th December 2016, 01:13 AM
Trumpydumpy!

You do realize if you keep going like it appears you are genetically programmed to do, you'll probably get a ban that is way longer than your previous ban? ;D

Stupid is as stupid does!

7th trump
28th December 2016, 05:16 AM
Trumpydumpy!

You do realize if you keep going like it appears you are genetically programmed to do, you'll probably get a ban that is way longer than your previous ban? ;D

Stupid is as stupid does!

As if your opinion counts for anything worth reading

Neuro
28th December 2016, 08:31 AM
As if your opinion counts for anything worth reading

You got a thirty day ban for spamming the forum, remember?

7th trump
28th December 2016, 08:44 AM
You got a thirty day ban for spamming the forum, remember?

Forget to wear your underwear again today?
How is it spamming in a thread about my banning?

Honestly your spamming is only out done by crimethinks spamming.
I rarely spam.

And no it never says what you are banned for. Just says you are temporarily restricted from posted until such a date.

boogietillyapuke
28th December 2016, 09:02 AM
I get more views than you do with the little threads I post in.
When I post in a thread it jumps by the 100's of views in a matter of hours....you?....bahahahaha!
You dont get that kind of following.

It's like a a pileup on the interstate, just can't not rubberneck.

Hitch
28th December 2016, 09:15 AM
I get more views than you do with the little threads I post in.
When I post in a thread it jumps by the 100's of views in a matter of hours....you?....bahahahaha!
You dont get that kind of following.

And...we wonder why our membership seems to be at an all time low.

8784

Neuro
28th December 2016, 11:50 AM
I rarely spam.

Hehehe ;D

Just give the idiot a shovel, and he digs his own grave!

midnight rambler
28th December 2016, 12:46 PM
I rarely (drink).

Said the alcoholic in denial. lol

midnight rambler
28th December 2016, 12:53 PM
You dont (sic) get that kind of following.

Some folks are just naturally drawn to watching train wrecks happen.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwmVGDn0hk0

ximmy
28th December 2016, 01:12 PM
Some folks are just naturally drawn to watching train wrecks happen.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwmVGDn0hk0

A metaphor for the life of many a person.

7th trump
28th December 2016, 02:01 PM
Hehehe ;D

Just give the idiot a shovel, and he digs his own grave!

Then show an example of me spamming?

7th trump
28th December 2016, 02:03 PM
Said the alcoholic in denial. lol

Why do you hate the USofA and yet still live here?
You claim you dont have a drivers license but yet you haven't disclosed how you get away with it spite having no serious knowledge of legality in any shape or form.

7th trump
28th December 2016, 02:06 PM
And...we wonder why our membership seems to be at an all time low.

8784

Maybe its because of spammers like crimethink and socialist who hate America?
trheres a lot of older people who went through the cold war who have family and friends that never came back fighting the communist but look at this place the the few active commies that always talk shit about America and say great things about the enemy....never occurred to you these people might not like reading posts from midnight whos always on here glorifying jews like stalin and Lennon.

Many decided to leave when Neuro became a mod...most havent been seen since.

I doubt its from me...This thread already has a 5 star rating and 100's of views...do the math!

crimethink
28th December 2016, 04:08 PM
I rarely spam.


Everything you post is spam. Incoherent, admittedly attention-seeking trolling spam. You don't aim for contribution...you aim for views. Trolling.




And no it never says what you are banned for. Just says you are temporarily restricted from posted until such a date.

Idiot, Neuro was a mod here, and many of us know what the mod console looks like in vBulletin. Bans usually do include a reason - your last one didn't by mod option.

crimethink
28th December 2016, 04:10 PM
Then show an example of me spamming?

http://gold-silver.us/forum/search.php?searchid=2901950

crimethink
28th December 2016, 04:17 PM
Maybe its because of spammers like crimethink and socialist who hate America?
trheres a lot of older people who went through the cold war who have family and friends that never came back fighting the communist but look at this place the the few active commies that always talk shit about America and say great things about the enemy....never occurred to you these people might not like reading posts from midnight whos always on here glorifying jews like stalin and Lennon.


WTF?!

I have never seen Sukhoi Fan/IAMIAF/midnight rambler ever - I mean NEVER, EVER - glorify Stalin or Lenin.

And you are in no position to spew self-righteous bullshit about "sacrifices to Communism." My grandmother and her family fought Lenin and Stalin on the ground, in the USSR, and almost paid for it with their lives. Your Jewish America protected and financed Lenin & Stalin and their scum successors from 1917 to 1989. Antony Sutton of the Hoover Institution and others demonstrated this in his magnum opus and follow-on work, respectively. So fuck off, you diarrhea-filled troll.




I doubt its from me...This thread already has a 5 star rating and 100's of views...do the math!

How many of your sockpuppets did you use to upvote this thread?

Several of your fellow trolls also upvoted, surely, as well.

midnight rambler
28th December 2016, 04:43 PM
This thread already has a 5 star rating and 100's of views...do the math!

A legend in his own mind. lol

Of course having delusions of grandeur is an indication of mental illness.

And fwiw this is Palani's thread about the trolling dung beetle, so kudos go to Palani.

Cebu_4_2
28th December 2016, 06:04 PM
There was a vote?

7th trump
28th December 2016, 09:23 PM
WTF?!

I have never seen Sukhoi Fan/IAMIAF/midnight rambler ever - I mean NEVER, EVER - glorify Stalin or Lenin.

And you are in no position to spew self-righteous bullshit about "sacrifices to Communism." My grandmother and her family fought Lenin and Stalin on the ground, in the USSR, and almost paid for it with their lives. Your Jewish America protected and financed Lenin & Stalin and their scum successors from 1917 to 1989. Antony Sutton of the Hoover Institution and others demonstrated this in his magnum opus and follow-on work, respectively. So fuck off, you diarrhea-filled troll.




How many of your sockpuppets did you use to upvote this thread?

Several of your fellow trolls also upvoted, surely, as well.
Wow you really are a stoop
midnight glorifies lennon and stalin by glorifying the things that made those two jews powerful and feared...soviet millitary might.
You cant be that stupid could you?
Wait...never mind.

Nope i didnt vote nor have a sock puppet, but you certainly seem to know an awful lot about midnights sock puppets.
Interesting he has three sock puppets...why is that?
Myself I believe you are another sock puppet of midnights.

crimethink
28th December 2016, 11:28 PM
wow you really are a stoop
midnight glorifies lennon and stalin by glorifying the things that made those two jews powerful and feared...soviet millitary might.
You cant be that stupid could you?
Wait...never mind.

Nope i didnt vote nor have a sock puppet, but you certainly seem to know an awful lot about midnights sock puppets.
Interesting he has three sock puppets...why is that?
Myself i believe you are another sock puppet of midnights.

*** spam alert ***

Hitch
28th December 2016, 11:52 PM
*** spam alert ***

CT, we gotta stop feeding this troll. He's hellbent. He's a maniac.

7th, my message to you. Find God. Accept Jesus. Don't just say it, but accept him into your heart. We are all sinners, but Jesus would not approve of your behavior on this forum.