Log in

View Full Version : Donald Trump Signs Executive Actions: ‘Today the USA Gets Back Control of its Borders



Ares
25th January 2017, 06:56 PM
President Trump signed two executive actions on Wednesday, putting plans for his wall on the Southern border of the United States into motion and increasing security inside the country.

“A nation without borders is not a nation,” Trump said after the signing ceremony. “Beginning today, the United States of America gets back control of its borders, gets back its borders.”

After the orders were signed, Vice President Mike Pence swore in Gen. John Kelly as the Department of Homeland Security Secretary.

Donald Trump explained that when he asked his Department of Defense Secretary Gen. James Mattis for suggestions of whom to choose as head of the Department of Homeland Security, Mattis recommended Gen. Kelly “without hesitation”

“He’s a rough, tough guy but he’s also got a good heart,” Trump added.

Trump addressed a large audience of DHS employees and reporters, promising to help them do their jobs at the border.

“This is a law enforcement agency,” he said. “But for too long your offices and agents haven’t been allowed to properly do your jobs.”

He said that he would focus on enforcing existing laws on immigration and security, rather than trying to pass new laws. Trump specifically addressed families who lost loved ones as a result of illegal immigrant crime.

Trump said that pundits and the media have ignored victims of open borders. “To all of those hurting out there, I repeat to you these words. We hear you, we see you and you will never, ever be ignored again,” he said.

He vowed to support law enforcement officials for enforcing the rule of law in the United States.

“When it comes to public safety, there is no place for politics; no Republicans, no Democrats, just citizens,” he said.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/25/donald-trump-signs-executive-actions-today-the-usa-gets-back-control-of-its-borders/

Neuro
26th January 2017, 01:38 AM
He said that he would focus on enforcing existing laws on immigration and security, rather than trying to pass new laws.
Really, it isn't any more complicated than that! Clinton-Bush-Obama ordered law enforcement to stand down re illegal immigration. There is no other way of looking at it!

Cebu_4_2
26th January 2017, 03:45 AM
Really, it isn't any more complicated than that! Clinton-Bush-Obama ordered law enforcement to stand down re illegal immigration. There is no other way of looking at it!


We had videos from border agents saying this long ago.

PatColo
26th January 2017, 04:05 AM
this guy's still stuck in the L vs R paradigm.... not so much "libruls" as (((JWO globalists)))


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0Iu1yS5nzZ0/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=336&h=188&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=FvlCNwm_cbHsif74co5Io1uFSEg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Iu1yS5nzZ0)
8:02
ANGRY RANT- Liberals FREAKING OUT over TRUMP executive orders. Graphic language. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Iu1yS5nzZ0)

412 views
13 hours ago

singular_me
26th January 2017, 04:10 AM
the wall is a good issue to stir up the pot, instead of voiding all world trade agreements FIRST


let me know when the fed is audited, okay?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-24/mnuchin-backs-fed-independence-and-signals-reform-isn-t-priority

crimethink
26th January 2017, 04:14 AM
let me know when the fed is audited, okay?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-24/mnuchin-backs-fed-independence-and-signals-reform-isn-t-priority

Do you ever both checking for reposts?

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?94457-Mnuchin-Backs-Fed-Independence-and-Signals-Reform-Isn%92t-Priority

Neuro
26th January 2017, 04:28 AM
the wall is a good issue to stir up the pot, instead of voiding all world trade agreements FIRST


let me know when the fed is audited, okay?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-24/mnuchin-backs-fed-independence-and-signals-reform-isn-t-priority

The TPP is dead with Trump. You realistically can't just void a trade deal in place, if you do you can't have any trade with the countries involved, you have to replace it with new laws regulating the trade which have to go through Congress and Senate, before the president can sign it into law.

But he did sign an executive order 3 days ago to renegotiate NAFTA with Canada and Mexico. http://nordic.businessinsider.com/trump-to-sign-executive-order-to-renegotiate-nafta-2017-1?r=US&IR=T

He will not touch the Fed, it is the core of Jew power in USA. Trump is a Zionist.

Glass
26th January 2017, 07:57 AM
I wonder what the term "Rule of Law" actually means. G Bush I used that term a lot in his new world order speeches. Others have used it frequently since. It strikes me as a term that sounds like it means one thing but could mean another thing entirely.

He certainly seems like "action man". There was a lot of Wall numberology around trump. Berlin wall etc. he has that national socialist air about him.

Neuro
26th January 2017, 02:51 PM
the wall is a good issue to stir up the pot, instead of voiding all world trade agreements FIRST

Damn it woman this must be your lucky day. He starts building the wall and slaps a 20% trade tariff on Mexico to pay for it!

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/white-house-seeks-20-tariff-mexican-imports-pay-wall-article-1.2956641

The White House announced they plan to pay for a border wall with a 20% tariff on all goods coming in from Mexico, the latest salvo in an escalating feud between President Trump and the U.S.'s southern neighbor that could escalate into a trade war.

"When you look at the plan that's taking shape now, using comprehensive tax reform as a means to tax imports from countries that we have a trade deficit from, like Mexico," White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer announced to reporters aboard Air Force One, shortly after Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto announced he was canceling a planned visit to President Trump.

Spectrism
26th January 2017, 04:13 PM
Consider the hurt Mexico is about to face.

1. They cannot easily export their criminals anymore. They will either pay the cost of prisons or let the savages run loose.

2. Money will not be flooding in from illegals in the US. Watch what Trump does about money transfers to Mexico.

3. Drug runners will be strangled and so will the drug flow. Money flow back will dry up. Drug dealers will get meaner and then hungrier while they chew up the locals.

4. Factories in Mexico will close as plans for new plants are scuttled. No work. No money.

5. Riots will rip all cities apart. Savagery will multiply everywhere.

Neuro
26th January 2017, 04:45 PM
Consider the hurt Mexico is about to face.

1. They cannot easily export their criminals anymore. They will either pay the cost of prisons or let the savages run loose.

2. Money will not be flooding in from illegals in the US. Watch what Trump does about money transfers to Mexico.

3. Drug runners will be strangled and so will the drug flow. Money flow back will dry up. Drug dealers will get meaner and then hungrier while they chew up the locals.

4. Factories in Mexico will close as plans for new plants are scuttled. No work. No money.

5. Riots will rip all cities apart. Savagery will multiply everywhere.

Everything on that list will happen. I bet Mexico's president to ask for a big plate of humble pie and come and visit Trump soon!

Cebu_4_2
27th January 2017, 05:11 AM
Everything on that list will happen. I bet Mexico's president to ask for a big plate of humble pie and come and visit Trump soon!

Look What Happened to the Peso After Mexico’s President Cancelled Trump Meeting

January 26, 2017 By C.E. Dyer (http://thefederalistpapers.org/author/cdyer) 2 Comments (http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/look-what-happened-to-the-peso-after-mexicos-president-cancelled-trump-meeting#comments)
http://thefederalistpapers.integratedmarket.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/nietopeso.jpg (http://thefederalistpapers.integratedmarket.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/nietopeso.jpg)

Well look what we have here. After Mexico’s President Enrique Peña Nieto took to Twitter to announce that he wouldn’t meet with President Donald Trump next week, the peso took a tumble.
Business Insider reported (http://www.businessinsider.com/fx-currency-market-update-january-26-2017-2017-1):


The peso was down by 1.2% at 21.3175 per dollar as of 11:57 a.m. ET.
The currency had been up by as much as 0.8% at 20.9358 per dollar at about 8:50 a.m. ET.

That followed a tweet (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/824615820391305216) sent earlier on Thursday morning from Trump’s personal Twitter account that said: “The U.S. has a 60 billion dollar trade deficit with Mexico. It has been a one-sided deal from the beginning of NAFTA with massive numbers of jobs and companies lost. If Mexico is unwilling to pay for the badly needed wall, then it would be better to cancel the upcoming meeting.”

Peña Nieto was initially scheduled to meet with Trump next Tuesday in what would have been the duo’s first bilateral meeting since the new US administration took office.

Mexican opposition figures had urged Peña Nieto to cancel the meeting to protest Trump’s demand that Mexico pay for a wall on its border with the US, according to reports on Wednesday. In a recorded address that was nationally televised, Peña Nieto said, “I regret and reject the decision of the US to build the wall.”


Trump, in an interview with ABC News (https://twitter.com/ThisWeekABC/status/824309867783458817) that aired on Wednesday, noted that he wants construction on the wall at the southern border to begin as soon as it can. ABC News’ David Muir asked if that would mean it could begin in just months, Trump replied: “I would say in months, yeah.”

Times are changing and it’s not going to be business as usual — as Trump has made that perfectly clear this week.

Peña Nieto can stage all the faux protests he wants to but as Trump has noted; the wall is getting built and they will pay for it.
Peña Nieto surely knows that which is why these little chest puffing episodes are so laughable and ultimately irrelevant

Neuro
27th January 2017, 05:23 AM
Mexicans are almost only ideological driven, and there is no way the Mexican president will back down from his position of not paying for the wall...








...NOT
;D

EE_
27th January 2017, 08:25 AM
Not many people know that Mexico thinks much of the US still belongs to Mexico. I've heard children out west say that their parents told them they are coming to take back their land. Could also be why Mexico is putting up such a fight...besides their drug/human trafficking trade and the billions of dollars being smuggled back.

Aztlan and the reconquista.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIW-BZ8oLrk


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNYaDh-iSVE&t=595s

monty
27th January 2017, 09:09 AM
Not many people know that Mexico thinks much of the US still belongs to Mexico. I've heard children out west say that their parents told them they are coming to take back their land. Could also be why Mexico is putting up such a fight...besides their drug/human trafficking trade and the billions of dollars being smuggled back.

Aztlan and the reconquista.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIW-BZ8oLrk


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNYaDh-iSVE&t=595s

I am not defending the mexicanos line of thinking, but this will explain why they do believe they still own Upper California

http://users.humboldt.edu/ogayle/hist110/unit3/MexicanAmericanWar.html


As of December 31, 2014, I retired from full-time teaching in Humboldt State University's Department of History (http://www2.humboldt.edu/history/faculty_staff/). While this website will remain online, it is no longer maintained.

History 110 - Dr. Gayle Olson-Raymer
Whose Manifest Destiny? The Conquest of Northern Mexico

http://users.humboldt.edu/ogayle/hist110/MexicanAmericanWar.png (http://users.humboldt.edu/ogayle/hist110/MexicanAmericanWar.png)



This is what most Americans actually KNOW about what happened at the battle of the Alamo in 1846: http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/the-alamo/trailer? (http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/the-alamo/trailer)

And this is a perspective most Americans DO NOT KNOW about the ensuing Mexican American War - a perspective presented in a Mexican textbook on the annexation of Texas and the U.S. intervention in Mexico, As Others See Us.


"Texas was annexed to the United States by the treaty of April 12, 1844, despite the protests of our [Mexican] government and even though the treaty was rejected by the American Congress. Thereupon the annexation of the territory was proposed in the House and approved on March 1, 1845, which forced our Minister in Washington to withdraw. The Texans, backed by the American
goverment,

http://users.humboldt.edu/ogayle/hist110/MexAmericanWar.png

claimed that its boundaries extended to the Rio Bravo del Norte [Rio Grand], whereas in fact the true limits had never passed the Nueces River. From this [boundary dispute] a long controversy developed [during which negotiations were carried on] in bad faith by the Americans.

They ordered troops to invade places within our territory, operating with the greatest treachery, and pretended that it was Mexico which had invaded their territory, making Mexico appear as the aggressor. What they were really seeking was to provoke a war, a war in which the southern states of the Union were greatly interested, in order to acquire new territories which they could convert into states dominated by the slavery interests. But since the majority of the people in the United States were not pro-slavery nor favorable of a war of conquest, President Polk tried to give a defensive character to his first military moves, foreseeing the opposition which he would otherwide encounter. Once he obtained a declaration of war, Polk made it appear that he wanted nothing more than peaceful possession of the annexed territory...

The Mexican War was a brilliant move astutely planned by the United States. The magnificent lands of Texas and California with their ports on both oceans, the gold deposits soon to be discovered in the latter state, and the increase in territory which made possible the growth of slave states compensated the United States many times over the costs in men and money of the unjust acquisition..."



Today, we are going to sort out some of the myths and realities of Mexican American relations before, during, and after the Mexican American War.
Continued at link . . . http://users.humboldt.edu/ogayle/hist110/unit3/MexicanAmericanWar.html

Carl
27th January 2017, 11:16 AM
The TPP is dead with Trump. You realistically can't just void a trade deal in place, if you do you can't have any trade with the countries involved, you have to replace it with new laws regulating the trade which have to go through Congress and Senate, before the president can sign it into law.

But he did sign an executive order 3 days ago to renegotiate NAFTA with Canada and Mexico. http://nordic.businessinsider.com/trump-to-sign-executive-order-to-renegotiate-nafta-2017-1?r=US&IR=T

He will not touch the Fed, it is the core of Jew power in USA. Trump is a Zionist.

The TPP is not a trade deal or treaty, it was never ratified by congress, the nigger and corporations just went along with it as if it were a done deal.

It's like a majority of the UN globalist bullshit treaties that were never ratified by congress, but states and the USG complied with them as if they were.

I don't think Trump is even aware of the real issues with the Fed. Hell, Ron Paul spent 17 years in congress and never figured the Fed out.

Neuro
27th January 2017, 12:18 PM
The TPP is not a trade deal or treaty, it was never ratified by congress, the nigger and corporations just went along with it as if it were a done deal.

It's like a majority of the UN globalist bullshit treaties that were never ratified by congress, but states and the USG complied with them as if they were.

I don't think Trump is even aware of the real issues with the Fed. Hell, Ron Paul spent 17 years in congress and never figured the Fed out.

Ron Paul and Don Trump both know the deal with Fed and 9/11 and Israel, they both know the history of the Kennedy family not to go there. Re the Fed Ron Paul was the appointed controlled opposition. He went to the same school as Greenspan (no it isn't a mere coincidence his sons name is Rand).

I know TPP was never ratified, if it had been of course it wouldn't have been dead yet.

Horn
27th January 2017, 01:29 PM
Mexican president is probably encouraging the peso to fall 20% to match the proposed silly special tariff.

Canada, China and the rest of the globe will rejoice either way.

crimethink
27th January 2017, 02:53 PM
I am not defending the mexicanos line of thinking, but this will explain why they do believe they still own Upper California

I don't give an iota of a shit what they think they own. Britain and Russia have greater claims on my county/region than the Spics do (Nova Albion by Sir Francis Drake and the Russian-American Company's Fort Ross(ija) & territory). The local Indians preferred to work for the Russians, since they actually paid them like human beings, rather than enslave them as the Spics did.

Hitch
27th January 2017, 03:04 PM
3. Drug runners will be strangled and so will the drug flow. Money flow back will dry up. Drug dealers will get meaner and then hungrier while they chew up the locals.

The drug cartels are very powerful down there, and they will take a huge hit as drug money dries up. I've read they pull in 64 Billion Dollars in drug money from the US.

They could actually launch their own invasion on the border, try to overthrow the wall and border patrol. Hope Trump has a plan in place for this. I wouldn't want to live anywhere near the border. Those cartels are the most violent people and they will be pissed.

crimethink
27th January 2017, 03:05 PM
The drug cartels are very powerful down there, and they will take a huge hit as drug money dries up. They could actually launch their own invasion on the border, try to overthrow the wall and border patrol. Hope Trump has a plan in place for this. I wouldn't want to live anywhere near the border. Those cartels are the most violent people and they will be pissed.

US Army > Spic Cartels

We have the means; the will has simply been missing.

Hitch
27th January 2017, 03:11 PM
US Army > Spic Cartels

We have the means; the will has simply been missing.

Does the border patrol have tanks? Because the cartels do. I'm just saying, if our border is not completely manned, as well as a wall, it could get ugly.

Horn
27th January 2017, 03:20 PM
The U.S. Army is a drug cartel, I don't see any problems arising.

Its only if someone tries to compete with them.

Neuro
27th January 2017, 03:25 PM
The drug cartels are very powerful down there, and they will take a huge hit as drug money dries up. I've read they pull in 64 Billion Dollars in drug money from the US.

They could actually launch their own invasion on the border, try to overthrow the wall and border patrol. Hope Trump has a plan in place for this. I wouldn't want to live anywhere near the border. Those cartels are the most violent people and they will be pissed.

They don't have any weapons or forces the US can't counter a hundred fold if it wants too.

Cebu_4_2
27th January 2017, 03:26 PM
Joint Statement on U.S. - Mexico Relations

The United States President Donald J. Trump and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto spoke by phone this morning for an hour. The call was mutually arranged by their teams.

The two had a productive and constructive call regarding the bilateral relationship between the two countries, the current trade deficit the United States has with Mexico, the importance of the friendship between the two nations, and the need for the two nations to work together to stop drug cartels, drug trafficking and illegal guns and arms sales.

With respect to payment for the border wall, both presidents recognize their clear and very public differences of positions on this issue but have agreed to work these differences out as part of a comprehensive discussion on all aspects of the bilateral relationship.

Both presidents have instructed their teams to continue the dialogue to strengthen this important strategic and economic relationship in a constructive way.

Hitch
27th January 2017, 03:37 PM
They don't have any weapons or forces the US can't counter a hundred fold if it wants too.

They have land mines, RPG's, improvised tanks, helicoptors, and submarines. Plus, a lot of armed people willing to die for the drug trade. They are trained up to military standards as well. Of course the US military could handle them, but it would still be a full on war. They have 64 Billion dollars at stack, all from the US drug trade, and I don't think they will let Trump's wall stand in front of that.

Horn
27th January 2017, 03:42 PM
I don't think they will let Trump's wall stand in front of that.

Ofcourse Not, they are the ones building it to stiemy the competition, drug cartels in Mexico are the exact reason for the rise of Mexican centralized goverment.

Its a symbiotic relationship similar to rum runners in U.S. prohibition era. Prohibition made D.C. what it is today.

Horn
27th January 2017, 10:39 PM
What I would worry about is wall construction creating a new breed of green or sjw homegrown to the U.S. side.

But there's probably a growing desire for those in the BRAZIL type future Republic.

The Wall is going to be a focal magnet point for any matrydom