PDA

View Full Version : Ivanka, Jared Intervened To Strip Language Critical Of The Paris Climate Accords



Horn
8th March 2017, 10:52 PM
Ivanka, Jared Intervened To Strip Language Critical Of The Paris Climate Accords Out Of An Executive Order


Ivanka Trump and her husband, White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, intervened to get a pending executive order stripped of language critical of an international climate agreement signed by President Barack Obama.

Kushner and Ivanka “intervened to strike language about the climate deal from an earlier draft of the executive order,” sources familiar with the matter told The Wall Street Journal.

Ivanka and her husband “have been considered a moderating influence on the White House’s position on climate change and environmental issues,” WSJ reports. Now, the executive order will have no mention of the so-called Paris agreement.

President Donald Trump is expected to sign two executive orders in the coming days to begin dismantling Obama’s Climate Action Plan and other costly environmental regulations. The orders reportedly target the Clean Power Plan (CPP), a moratorium on new coal mining leases, and the “Waters of the U.S.” rule.

Trump promised to withdraw from the Paris agreement and stop global warming payments to the U.N. while on the campaign trail. But Trump’s opposition to Obama’s climate agenda seems to be running up against his daughter’s plans.

WSJ noted the “move is the latest sign of influence Mr. Trump’s daughter and Mr. Kushner have in a White House that has seen internal divisions on a variety of issues, including foreign policy.”

A source close to Ivanka told Politico in December she “wants to make climate change — which her father has called a hoax perpetuated by the Chinese — one of her signature issues,” adding that “Ivanka is in the early stages of exploring how to use her spotlight to speak out on the issue.”

Ivanka and her father both met with former Vice President Al Gore, a global warming crusader, just days after Politico’s report. It’s unclear what was discussed at Trump Tower that day.

Nearly 200 nations signed onto the the U.N. agreement in Paris in 2015. The agreement went into effect in November, and Obama unilaterally committed to cut U.S. emissions 26 to 28 percent by 2025.

Trump may also be receiving pressure to stay in the Paris agreement from Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who told lawmakers during his confirmation hearing he thought the U.S. should keep their seat at the negotiating table.

Tillerson backed a carbon tax while CEO of ExxonMobil.

If Trump kept the U.S. in the Paris agreement, it would likely be a symbolic gesture. One of the executive orders Trump is expected to soon sign requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to withdraw the CPP.

The Obama administration saw the CPP as its main tool to comply with the Paris agreement. The EPA estimates the CPP would have cut carbon dioxide emissions from power plants 32 percent by 2030.

The CPP is one of several EPA rules being challenged by dozens of states in federal court. The Supreme Court issued a stay against the CPP in 2016, but an executive order could render a court challenge moot.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/23/ivanka-jared-intervened-to-strip-language-critical-of-the-paris-climate-accords-out-of-an-executive-order/#ixzz4aoDRdaQO

monty
11th March 2017, 12:00 PM
Surrounded by CFR, Goldman Sachs, jew family, I'm Israels best friend. Can we expect anything less?

https://www.israelandstuff.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Photo-Illustration-by-The-Daily-Beast.png

monty
11th March 2017, 12:03 PM
Global warming snowflake destroyed with facts ~ Leo 'Six Gun' Stratton


http://youtu.be/Qz3cLRsqFG4

https://youtu.be/Qz3cLRsqFG4

Horn
18th April 2017, 11:32 PM
In a Blow to Steve Bannon, Trump May Keep Obama’s Paris Climate Agreement


http://15130-presscdn-0-89.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2017-04-01T021105Z_1_LYNXMPED301WU_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP-701x467.jpg

"Trump may remain in Paris climate deal. That would deal a huge blow to Bannon's fraudulent nationalism"

And the hits just keep on coming, with Steve Bannon no doubt beginning to feel like a punching bag. In what might be the surest sign of loss of street cred, The Washington Post‘s Greg Sargent is reporting (https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/04/18/trump-may-be-about-to-break-another-big-promise-thats-very-good-news/?utm_term=.1209544a78d1) at the Plum Line that Donald Trump may break his campaign promise and remain in the Paris Climate Agreement (http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php):

According to Sargent, Trump will hear from his advisers today on how best to proceed. Apparently, both Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner want to remain and even Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has said he likes the idea of “keeping a seat at the table.” Other corporations were signaling even as far back as November (http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/17/502425711/hundreds-of-u-s-businesses-urge-trump-to-uphold-paris-climate-deal) of last year a desire to stay in.The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change offers (http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php)a valuable reminder of the agreement’s goals:“The Paris Agreement’s central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius.”It was reported (http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/17/502425711/hundreds-of-u-s-businesses-urge-trump-to-uphold-paris-climate-deal)at the time by NPR,


More than 360 companies and investors made their plea in an open letter (http://www.lowcarbonusa.org/) to Trump, President Obama and members of Congress. They called on Trump to “continue U.S. participation in the Paris agreement,” which he has threatened to scrap, and invest in the “low carbon economy at home and abroad.”

As these corporations did then and continue today to recognize is that there are benefits to remaining a part of the agreement, and as Sargent observes, Tillerson’s support is significant:


Still, it’s telling that Tillerson wants to remain in the deal, because that represents a recognition that reneging on this particular international commitment could have detrimental diplomatic consequences. “Imagine trying to get other leaders’ cooperation on the next international crisis, or any Trump priority, after you stuck a finger in everyone’s eye,” David Doniger, director of the climate program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told me.


“In this sense,” says Sargent, “staying in the Paris accord could deal another blow to the Bannon wing’s ‘economic nationalist’ project,” that “international engagement is primarily a cause for deep suspicion — it’s a threat to American sovereignty.”

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/04/18/blow-steve-bannon-trump-obamas-paris-climate-agreement.html

Joshua01
19th April 2017, 04:52 AM
I don't recall electing these two jewbags, does anyone remember seeing their names on the ballot?
Ivanka, Jared Intervened To Strip Language Critical Of The Paris Climate Accords Out Of An Executive Order



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/23/ivanka-jared-intervened-to-strip-language-critical-of-the-paris-climate-accords-out-of-an-executive-order/#ixzz4aoDRdaQO

Horn
20th April 2017, 09:17 AM
In a Blow to Steve Bannon, Trump May Keep Obama’s Paris Climate Agreement


http://15130-presscdn-0-89.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2017-04-01T021105Z_1_LYNXMPED301WU_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP-701x467.jpg

"Trump may remain in Paris climate deal. That would deal a huge blow to Bannon's fraudulent nationalism"

And the hits just keep on coming, with Steve Bannon no doubt beginning to feel like a punching bag. In what might be the surest sign of loss of street cred, The Washington Post‘s Greg Sargent is reporting (https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/04/18/trump-may-be-about-to-break-another-big-promise-thats-very-good-news/?utm_term=.1209544a78d1) at the Plum Line that Donald Trump may break his campaign promise and remain in the Paris Climate Agreement (http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php):

[COLOR=#444444][FONT=georgia]According to Sargent, Trump will hear from his advisers today on how best to proceed. Apparently, both Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner want to remain and even Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has said he likes the idea

Wonder what globalist snapped that above photo?

Bannon is obviously Pfowned! in it

singular_me
20th April 2017, 09:51 AM
he is as bad as bill clinton and his pay for play

Trump Inaugural Funded By Donors With Vested Interests – draining the swamp, right?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/us/politics/trump-inauguration-sheldon-adelson-fundraising.html


demoracynow's leftist progressives discuss kushner and ivanka

Kleptocracy?: How Ivanka Trump & Jared Kushner Personally Profit from Their Roles in the White House

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n75G1C8Nzc

Horn
20th April 2017, 01:13 PM
Demuplicans and MSM are working hard to drive leftist meathooks into the Trump admin.

Ignorance over Syria and a renewed commitment to all things Zion the driving force.

Is working, A new Royal family Star has been born.

Hillbilly
20th April 2017, 06:59 PM
I don't recall electing these two jewbags, does anyone remember seeing their names on the ballot?

You were warned not to vote for Dump and his cronies.....you got punked.

7th trump
20th April 2017, 07:01 PM
You were warned not to vote for Dump and his cronies.....you got punked.


Says the jealous punk!

Joshua01
20th April 2017, 07:22 PM
It was either Trump or the skank. I'm going to stick with my pick
You were warned not to vote for Dump and his cronies.....you got punked.

crimethink
20th April 2017, 07:56 PM
It was either Trump or the skank. I'm going to stick with my pick

I picked neither, and can be pleased I was not conned.

7th trump
21st April 2017, 07:48 AM
I picked neither, and can be pleased I was not conned.so being the patriot you are you didn't care if Killary won there would be far worse consequences for America?
nice coming from someone who claims he has intelligence.

Horn
21st April 2017, 02:47 PM
so being the patriot you are you didn't care if Killary won there would be far worse consequences for America?
nice coming from someone who claims he has intelligence.

Both have jewish son-in laws, so the outcome could be much the same in this case.

the title of the thread may just read Chelsea and Marc.

Hillbilly
21st April 2017, 05:27 PM
It was either Trump or the skank. I'm going to stick with my pick

Then shut up and take it like a man. You voted for him, stop bitching about it.

Hillbilly
21st April 2017, 05:28 PM
Says the jealous punk!

Jealous of what?

singular_me
21st April 2017, 05:48 PM
hillary was absolutely NOT a choice but having a billionaire in the WH and clinton's pal sounded definitely very fishy in this landscape

crimethink
21st April 2017, 06:42 PM
Jealous of what?

Of being this forum's premier liar and dullard.

crimethink
21st April 2017, 06:49 PM
hillary was absolutely NOT a choice but having a billionaire in the WH and clinton's pal sounded definitely very fishy in this landscape

You voted for Hillary, and you got Hillary. You voted Trump, and you got Hillary.

Fools believe because those two use slightly different road maps we won't end up at the same demonic destination.

At this point, it's clear that Hillary Clinton was more honest than Trump. She didn't pretend to be our friend. Her internationalist, submerge America plan was laid out for everyone to see. Trump claimed he offered something much different, including locking the bitch up for her crimes. Reality has now shown the con man is aiming for the same main platform planks as her: more war, more internationalism, and allowing the young invaders to stay here. A few sideshows still lull the imbeciles into believing Trump is somehow fundamentally different from her, though.

Jerrylynnb
22nd April 2017, 08:48 AM
crimethink says:

"She didn't pretend to be our friend...Trump claimed he offered something much different"

Nail on the head! It is the added insult of deliberate DECEPTION plus BETRAYAL (pre-planned with full intention from the beginning) that is like SALT IN THE WOUND.