PDA

View Full Version : Mass Hypnosis and Trigger Words - Truthstream Media


PatColo
11th May 2017, 08:02 PM
Truthstream Media (http://truthstreammedia.com/) (YT channel (https://www.youtube.com/user/TRUTHstreammedia/videos)) is the project of Aaron Dykes (former JonesTown reporter) and his sis, Melissa.

13m 17s:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fznpRaM1wIg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fznpRaM1wIg
singular_me
12th May 2017, 01:40 AM
they really do an excellent job but dont like any interference with their work, if you ever post a comment that doesnt stay on topic, they will most likely hide/delete it. In other words they do apply censorship.

@12mins... NEO: it is not about talking about what you can feel, you can smell, taste and see that is real but merely electric signals interpreted by your brain

It is all about electricity... and knowing about how positive and negative charges influence the thinking mode is essential to avoid circular thinking and the 'us vs them' claptrap, which has done wonders millennia long.
Neuro
12th May 2017, 02:03 AM
they really do an excellent job but dont like any interference with their work, if you ever post a comment that doesnt stay on topic, they will most likely hide/delete it. In other words they do apply censorship.

You have no idea how reasonable that approach is...
singular_me
12th May 2017, 03:37 AM
You have no idea how reasonable that approach is...

sure, anything that doesnt fit the us vs them narrrative must be deleted LOL...

more seriously I dont see how completely agreeing with the facts and offering another conclusion can be seen as "not on topic"... sure it takes the whole topic in another direction but it still is the same topic, but so many people are afraid to let go their illusions that they must censor the 3rd option

I still think that they do an excellent job, but they have shown their limits. Their doc Obsolete doesnt offer ANY solution though.
Neuro
12th May 2017, 04:23 PM
sure, anything that doesnt fit the us vs them narrrative must be deleted LOL...

more seriously I dont see how completely agreeing with the facts and offering another conclusion can be seen as "not on topic"... sure it takes the whole topic in another direction but it still is the same topic, but so many people are afraid to let go their illusions that they must censor the 3rd option

I still think that they do an excellent job, but they have shown their limits. Their doc Obsolete doesnt offer ANY solution though.

You were the one saying "not on topic", however I am not surprise to see you know trying to change the definition of what that entails rather than admit you made a mistake... It is par for you.