PDA

View Full Version : Ramadan Bombathon 2017



midnight rambler
30th May 2017, 01:57 PM
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?5

crimethink
30th May 2017, 04:38 PM
Ramadan commemorates the first psychotic delusions of the Pedophile Muhammad which he vomited out to be included in the Quran.

Timing is based on the astrological symbol of Moon god Allah: sightings of the Crescent Moon.

singular_me
30th May 2017, 05:56 PM
Just for the record CT... Florida is one of 27 US states that permits children of any age to be married with their parents’ permission.’
not only in islam

Glass
30th May 2017, 07:27 PM
You missed out death by American and Allied forces. That would be Christian wouldn't it? Or is it not classed as terror? I think it's at least a couple dozen (http://ed.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SYRIA?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-05-26-10-36-51). Maybe it was before Ramadan, 280+ (https://airwars.org/news/international-airstrikes-and-civilian-casualty-claims-in-iraq-and-syria-april-2017/)

crimethink
31st May 2017, 07:14 AM
Just for the record CT... Florida is one of 27 US states that permits children of any age to be married with their parents’ permission.’
not only in islam

NOPE.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0741/Sections/0741.0405.html

Minimum age: 16

The Pedophile Muhammad's "wife" = 6 years old. But he waited until she was 9 to "know" her.

Ares
31st May 2017, 07:23 AM
(4) No license to marry shall be granted to any person under the age of 16 years, with or without the consent of the parents, except as provided in subsections (2) and (3).

Do you think she just makes shit up most of the time and expects people to just take what she says??


Just in case some are lazy and don't want to visit the link for subsections 2 and 3:

(2) The county court judge of any county in the state may, in the exercise of his or her discretion, issue a license to marry to any male or female under the age of 18 years, upon application of both parties sworn under oath that they are the parents of a child.
(3) When the fact of pregnancy is verified by the written statement of a licensed physician, the county court judge of any county in the state may, in his or her discretion, issue a license to marry:
(a) To any male or female under the age of 18 years upon application of both parties sworn under oath that they are the expectant parents of a child; or
(b) To any female under the age of 18 years and male over the age of 18 years upon the female’s application sworn under oath that she is an expectant parent.

midnight rambler
31st May 2017, 07:34 AM
Day 5 update posted.

Joshua01
31st May 2017, 08:52 AM
Didn't we have 80 more killed in Afghanistan today? It's beginning to look like Chicongo out there

singular_me
31st May 2017, 12:01 PM
I meant to insert the link yesterday but forgot...

go and look at the pedophile thread, the marriage of a 11yo with her rapist because she was pregnant... in the news>>>> a few days ago.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?93695-Pizzagate&p=898438&viewfull=1#post898438

I dont see any difference between a 6 and 11 year old, same evil moral relativism


NOPE.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0741/Sections/0741.0405.html

Minimum age: 16

The Pedophile Muhammad's "wife" = 6 years old. But he waited until she was 9 to "know" her.

singular_me
31st May 2017, 12:22 PM
I do not make shit up, all I am speaking on here has sound theories, which are not your cup of tea, but this is not because you don't like the topics I am very well versed in (and which make your feel threatened), that I make shit up, this is really "shoot the messenger" at its finest..plz be my guest, ridicule yourself... meanwhile Walter Russell (electricity is the manifestation of God), Natural Laws, and the EU are gaining traction...

RIGHT, THAT IS WHY A 11YO GIRL (PREGNANT) MARRIED HER RAPIST, GO TO THE THREAD ALSO
(3) When the fact of pregnancy is verified by the written statement of a licensed physician, the county court judge of any county in the state may, in his or her discretion, issue a license to marry:
(a) To any male or female under the age of 18 years upon application of both parties sworn under oath that they are the expectant parents of a child; or
(b) To any female under the age of 18 years and male over the age of 18 years upon the female’s application sworn under oath that she is an expectant parent.[

;D yes, a loophole... and there are 27 states like this in america, a loophole you do not see while english is your native tongue. LOL




(4) No license to marry shall be granted to any person under the age of 16 years, with or without the consent of the parents, except as provided in subsections (2) and (3).

Do you think she just makes shit up most of the time and expects people to just take what she says??


Just in case some are lazy and don't want to visit the link for subsections 2 and 3:

(2) The county court judge of any county in the state may, in the exercise of his or her discretion, issue a license to marry to any male or female under the age of 18 years, upon application of both parties sworn under oath that they are the parents of a child.
(3) When the fact of pregnancy is verified by the written statement of a licensed physician, the county court judge of any county in the state may, in his or her discretion, issue a license to marry:
(a) To any male or female under the age of 18 years upon application of both parties sworn under oath that they are the expectant parents of a child; or
(b) To any female under the age of 18 years and male over the age of 18 years upon the female’s application sworn under oath that she is an expectant parent.

crimethink
31st May 2017, 01:17 PM
I meant to insert the link yesterday but forgot...

go and look at the pedophile thread, the marriage of a 11yo with her rapist because she was pregnant... in the news>>>> a few days ago.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?93695-Pizzagate&p=898438&viewfull=1#post898438


The article is bullshit, intended to advance an agenda (and book sales).

It's the source of your FALSE claim, as well: "Florida is one of 27 US states that permits children of any age to be married with their parents’ permission."

As I have shown, that is NOT true.

The original source, the Jew York Times, didn't bother with the facts, as is typical of hard-left "reporting." They claim a county clerk issued a marriage license for the alleged marriage. This is simply impossible, as it requires a COURT ORDER to issue such a license for someone under 16.




I dont see any difference between a 6 and 11 year old

NAMBLA believes the same thing.

crimethink
31st May 2017, 01:22 PM
I do not make shit up....

(...)

(3) When the fact of pregnancy is verified by the written statement of a licensed physician, the county court judge of any county in the state may, in his or her discretion, issue a license to marry:
(a) To any male or female under the age of 18 years upon application of both parties sworn under oath that they are the expectant parents of a child; or
(b) To any female under the age of 18 years and male over the age of 18 years upon the female’s application sworn under oath that she is an expectant parent.[

;D yes, a loophole... and there are 27 states like this in america, a loophole you do not see while english is your native tongue. LOL

Please present us the court case docket number of EVEN ONE such "marriage" that has happened in the last 30 years anywhere in the USA.

Further, cite a single verifiable legal marriage of a girl younger than 14 anywhere in the USA since before World War II.

Ares
31st May 2017, 01:24 PM
I do not make shit up, all I am speaking on here has sound theories, which are not your cup of tea, but this is not because you don't like the topics I am very well versed in (and which make your feel threatened), that I make shit up, this is really "shoot the messenger" at its finest..plz be my guest, ridicule yourself... meanwhile Walter Russell (electricity is the manifestation of God), Natural Laws, and the EU are gaining traction...

RIGHT, THAT IS WHY A 11YO GIRL (PREGNANT) MARRIED HER RAPIST, GO TO THE THREAD ALSO
(3) When the fact of pregnancy is verified by the written statement of a licensed physician, the county court judge of any county in the state may, in his or her discretion, issue a license to marry:
(a) To any male or female under the age of 18 years upon application of both parties sworn under oath that they are the expectant parents of a child; or
(b) To any female under the age of 18 years and male over the age of 18 years upon the female’s application sworn under oath that she is an expectant parent.[

;D yes, a loophole... and there are 27 states like this in america, a loophole you do not see while english is your native tongue. LOL

Yes, you make shit up. You call it a "theory', but it's really just making shit up. It's funny you think I'm somehow feel threatened by your delusions. Whatever you have to tell yourself lady.. nothing could he further from the truth. The world deals in facts (most of the time), you're a contrarion just for the sake of being a contrarion. You offer no individual thoughts and spout the theories and thoughts of others as somehow gospel. You buy into absolute bullshit without even cross checking sources and you expect us to not call you out on it?

As for your loop hole, show me an 8 or 9 year old getting married in the state of Florida. If you can't shut the fuck up already with your God damn bullshit.

midnight rambler
31st May 2017, 01:28 PM
Take it elsewhere, stop derailing this thread!

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?95742-Child-marriage-LEGAL-in-27-states&p=898532#post898532

crimethink
31st May 2017, 01:28 PM
As for your loop hole, show me an 8 or 9 year old getting married in the state of Florida. If you can't shut the fuck up already with your God damn bullshit.

I'll settle for seeing the case of an 11-year old.

crimethink
31st May 2017, 01:29 PM
Take it elsewhere, stop derailing this thread!

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?95742-Child-marriage-LEGAL-in-27-states&p=898532#post898532

She's trying to run interference for Jizzlam, hence, her posting it here.

midnight rambler
31st May 2017, 01:30 PM
She's trying to run interference for Jizzlam, hence, her posting it here.

So you took the bait rather than starting an entirely different thread?

crimethink
31st May 2017, 01:48 PM
So you took the bait rather than starting an entirely different thread?

I return fire while under fire.

I've been on the Internet for 24 years, and I've never believed in "unitary topic" threads, either. There is always overlap.

singular_me
31st May 2017, 02:08 PM
see thread for my answer to ares

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?95742-Child-marriage-LEGAL-in-27-states&p=898557&viewfull=1#post898557

singular_me
31st May 2017, 02:52 PM
see same thread for my answer to CT


She's trying to run interference for Jizzlam, hence, her posting it here.

Norweger
31st May 2017, 05:47 PM
"This would make Asma 28 years of age in 1 A.H., the year of the Hijra, thus making Aisha 18 years old in 1 A.H. So Aisha would be 19 years old at the time of the consummation of her marriage, and 14 or 15 years old at the time of her nikah. It would place her year of birth at four or five years before the Call."

http://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htm

Norweger
31st May 2017, 05:49 PM
Gee, i wonder who is behind therelgionofpeace.com..

"In 2007, Islam and Judaism's holiest
holidays overlapped for 10 days.
Muslims racked up 397 dead bodies
in 94 terror attacks across 10 countries
during this time... while Jews
worked on their 159th Nobel Prize."

Oy vey jews so smart, Israel greatest ally.

crimethink
31st May 2017, 09:10 PM
"This would make Asma 28 years of age in 1 A.H., the year of the Hijra, thus making Aisha 18 years old in 1 A.H. So Aisha would be 19 years old at the time of the consummation of her marriage, and 14 or 15 years old at the time of her nikah. It would place her year of birth at four or five years before the Call."

http://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htm

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

-- Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234 - http://cmje.usc.edu/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/058-sbt.php


'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

-- Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3311 - http://hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/136-Sahih%20Muslim%20Book%2008.%20Marriage/11407-sahih-muslim-book-008-hadith-number-3311.html

Norweger
31st May 2017, 11:46 PM
Believe what you want.

crimethink
1st June 2017, 06:12 AM
Believe what you want.

I'll believe the truth. You will believe Islam.

midnight rambler
1st June 2017, 06:16 AM
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?6

Joshua01
1st June 2017, 07:33 AM
Do the 90 killed in Kabul count here?
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?6

Twisted Titan
1st June 2017, 08:12 AM
Believe what you want.


I believe and you MUST BELIEVE what was written in both of those haddiths because they are "Sahih" meaning that the narration is sound and is beyond dispute or reproach .

Unless you are questioning the authenticity of The Sunna, and if you question this

Why stop there?

Brother, you are in spiritual darkness ....you are being deceived

But you don't have to stay there

Norweger
1st June 2017, 08:28 AM
I believe and you MUST BELIEVE what was written in both of those haddiths because they are "Sahih" meaning that the narration is sound and is beyond dispute or reproach .

Unless you are questioning the authenticity of The Sunna, and if you question this

Why stop there?

Brother, you are in spiritual darkness ....you are being deceived

But you don't have to stay there

It's much better if i believe that one of the prophets is God right?

Norweger
1st June 2017, 08:29 AM
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?6

Oy vey Israel and America forever and forever. Your source is jewish by the way, but hey why bother having standards when it comes to muslims.. we'll take anything from anyone then.

Norweger
1st June 2017, 08:40 AM
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1055854/pg1

You cannot get into any discussion about hadith with anyone, Muslim or non-Muslim, without eventually encountering the widely quoted, and incessantly justified hadith which claims that A’isha [ra] was betrothed (engaged) to the Prophet Muhammad [pbuh] at the age of 6, and later married to him at the age of 9.

Because this hadith is found in the Sahih Bukhari collection, Muslims have managed to accept it as pure fact, without any real investigation, and have even gone as far as dancing around it so much, that they have essentially found ways to rationalize and justify its truth.

The explanation that is known to many Muslims goes like this:

"A’isha [ra] was an exceptionally intelligent, young woman, with an excellent, precise memory, and could be raised to absorb the teachings of the prophet, in order to convey that knowledge to a wider audience, even after he passed away"

Others go like this:

"Well, at that time...... It was totally normal for girls to marry at such a young age but you know... since society has developed, things have changed and girls marry at a later age."

With that logic it is should be perfectly fine for me to say " I don't have to follow the Prophets doings, such as growing a beard because society has changed. Most men shave today in the civilized world, and you know..... things have changed because my work place don't allow it."
I'd get shunned for saying this.

So why is not OK for me to follow the Prophets doings(sunnah) to its fullest by marrying a six year old (according to this ahadith) but must grow a beard? That's like claiming to follow the ten commandments and then leave one out.
I have yet to see, in this day and age, a grown man marrying a six year old.Yes, I even questioned a devout Muslims friend of mine, if he was prepared to marry a six year old and refused but came up with the same excuse above. Heck, it even contradicts the Quran.


So here is some to refute

EVIDENCE # 2 Betrothal

According to Tabari (also according to Hisham ibn ‘urwah, Ibn Hunbal and Ibn Sad), Ayesha was betrothed at seven years of age and began to cohabit with Prophet at the age of nine years. However, in another work, Al- Tabari says:

"All four of his [Abu Bakr's] children were born of his two wives -- the names of

whom we have already mentioned -- during the pre-Islamic period."(REF: Tarikhu'l-umam wa'l-mamlu'k, Al-Tabari (died 922), Vol. 4, p. 50, Arabic, Dara'l-fikr, Beirut, 1979)



If Ayesha was betrothed in 620 CE (at the age of 7 years) and started to live with Prophet in 624 CE or 2 AH (at the age of nine years), she was born in 613 CE [(Year of living with Prophet MINUS Ayesha’a age at that time of living with Prophet EQUALS the date of birth of Ayesha (624CE – 9 yrs = 613 CE)]. So, based on one account of Al-Tabari the numbers show that Ayesha must have born (613 CE) three years after the beginning of revelation (610 CE). And yet another place Tabari says that Ayesha was born in Pre-Islamic time (in Jahilliyyah). If she were born in pre-Islamic time (before 610 CE), she would have be at least 14 years old. So, Tabari contradicts himself.

CONCLUSION: Al-Tabari is unreliable in the matter of determining Ayesha’s age.



EVIDENCE # 3 The Age of Ayesha in Relation to the Age of Fathima.



According to According to Ibn Hajar,

“ Fatimah (ra) was born at the time the Ka`bah was rebuilt, when the Prophet (pbuh) was 35 years old... she (Fatimah) was five years older that Ayesha (ra).” (REF: Al-isabah fi tamyizi'l-sahabah, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, Vol. 4, P. 377, Maktabatu'l-Riyadh al-haditha, al-Riyadh, 1978)



So, based on Ibn Hajar, Fathima was born when Prophet was 35 years old and Ayesha was 5 years younger than Fathima. If Ibn Hajar’s statement is factual, Ayesha was born when Prophet was forty years old (Prophet’s age at the birth of Fathima PLUS 5 years = 40 years). If Ayesha was married to Prophet when he was 52 years old, Ayesha’ age at marriage would be 12 years [(Prophet’s age at the time of marriage MINUS Prophet’s age at Ayesha’s birth (52 yrs – 40 years = 12 yrs)].



CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar, Tabari an Ibn Hisham and Ibn Humbal contradict each other. So, the marriage of Ayesha at seven years of age is a myth.





EVIDENCE # 4 The Age of Ayesha in Relation to the Age of Asma

According to Abda'l-Rahman ibn abi zanna'd:

“Asma (ra) was ten years older than Ayesha. (REF: Siyar A`la'ma'l-nubala', Al-Zahabi, Vol. 2, p. 289, Arabic, Mu'assasatu'l-risalah, Beirut, 1992)



According to Ibn Kathir:

"She [Asma] was elder to her sister [Ayesha] by ten years". (REF: Al-Bidayah wa'l-nihayah, Ibn Kathir, Vol. 8, p. 371, Dar al-fikr al-`arabi, Al-jizah, 1933)



According to Ibn Kathir:

"She [Asma] saw the killing of her son during that year [i.e. 73 AH], as we have already mentioned, and five days later she herself died. According to other narratives she died not after five days but ten or twenty or a few days over twenty or a hundred days later. The most well known narrative is that of hundred days later. At the time of her death, she was 100 years old." (REF: Al-Bidayah wa'l-nihayah, Ibn Kathir (died 1333), Vol. 8, Pg. 372, Dar al-fikr al-`arabi, Al-jizah, 1933)



According to Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani:

"She [Asma (ra)] lived a hundred years and died in 73 or 74 AH." (REF: Taqribu'l-tehzib, Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, Pg 654, Arabic, Bab fi'l-nisa', al-harfu'l-alif, Lucknow)



According to almost all the historians Asma (ra), the elder sister of Ayesha (ra) was ten years older than Ayesha (ra). If Asma was 100 years old in 73 AH, she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijra [ Asma’s age MINUS 73 hijrah EQUALS the age of Asma at the time of Hijrah( 100 – 73 or 74 = 27 or 28)].



If Asma (ra) was 27 or 28 years old at the time of Hijrah, Ayesha (ra), being younger by 10 years, should have been 17 or 18 years old [Asma’s age at the time of Hijarah MINUS the age difference between Asma and Ayesha EQUALS the age of Ayesha at the time of Hijarh (27 or 28 –10 = 17 or 18 yrs)]. Thus, Ayesha (ra), being 17 or 18 years of at the time of Hijra, she started to cohabit with Prophet between 19 to 20 years old (The Age of Ayesha at the time of Hijra + the year of Ayesha cohabiting with Prophet (19-20 + 1-2 Hijra) = The Age of Ayesha when she cohabit with Prophet (19 or 20 years).



Based on Hajar, Ibn Katir, and Abda'l-Rahman ibn abi zanna'd, age of Ayesha at the time living with Prophet would be 19or 20 years. In evidence # 3, Ibn Hajar suggests that Ayesha is 12 years old and in evidence # 4 he contradicts himself with a seventeen or eighteen-year-old Ayesha (ra). What is the correct age, twelve or eighteen?

CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar is an unreliable source for Ayesha’s age.

Twisted Titan
1st June 2017, 11:09 AM
CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar, Tabari an Ibn Hisham and Ibn Humbal contradict each other. So, the marriage of Ayesha at seven years of age is a myth.

CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar is an unreliable source for Ayesha’s age.





You do realize you are making my point right?

You just quoted 3 Islamic scholars and they cant agree on something as basic as the age of one of his brides

Yet you will do a complete 180 and trust these same scholars on matters concerning ones Faith.

That's an amazing line of logic you are willing to ascribe to.

Because if their wrong.
Your wrong
And if your wrong
Your goose is cooked.

Neuro
1st June 2017, 01:11 PM
CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar, Tabari an Ibn Hisham and Ibn Humbal contradict each other. So, the marriage of Ayesha at seven years of age is a myth.

CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar is an unreliable source for Ayesha’s age.





You do realize you are making my point right?

You just quoted 3 Islamic scholars and they cant agree on something as basic as the age of one of his brides

Yet you will do a complete 180 and trust these same scholars on matters concerning ones Faith.

That's an amazing line of logic you are willing to ascribe to.

Because if their wrong.
Your wrong
And if your wrong
Your goose is cooked.

Your logic is impeccable!

Norweger
1st June 2017, 02:31 PM
CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar, Tabari an Ibn Hisham and Ibn Humbal contradict each other. So, the marriage of Ayesha at seven years of age is a myth.

CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar is an unreliable source for Ayesha’s age.





You do realize you are making my point right?

You just quoted 3 Islamic scholars and they cant agree on something as basic as the age of one of his brides

Yet you will do a complete 180 and trust these same scholars on matters concerning ones Faith.

That's an amazing line of logic you are willing to ascribe to.

Because if their wrong.
Your wrong
And if your wrong
Your goose is cooked.

So that means that Bukhari is automatically correct? Of course not. That is just you following your desires. If anythint this proves that there is a lot of doubt about what the enemies of Islam always claim, what they always bring up... that Aisha supposedly was 6 years old when married to the prophet Mohammed (pbuh).

As i said to crimethink, believe what you want. At least i've given you some pointers that would indicate that she was substantially older than what is claimed by the enemies of Islam.

crimethink
1st June 2017, 03:12 PM
As i said to crimethink, believe what you want. At least i've given you some pointers that would indicate that she was substantially older than what is claimed by the enemies of Islam.

Why would a Muslim scholar falsely claim Aisha was 6/7, and "married" at 9? What gain would there be to lie about that?

However, there is obvious gain in claiming she was much older.

The Quran asserts Allah is the best of deceivers.

The Bible states Satan is the best of deceivers.

Make the logical conclusion.

Norweger
1st June 2017, 03:20 PM
Why would a Muslim scholar falsely claim Aisha was 6/7, and "married" at 9? What gain would there be to lie about that?

Easy.. steering people away from Islam.

crimethink
1st June 2017, 03:23 PM
Easy.. steering people away from Islam.

LOL

One of the most respected extra-Quranical texts is intended to "steer people away from Islam." LOL

AGAIN:

The Quran asserts Allah is the best of deceivers.

The Bible states Satan is the best of deceivers.

Make the logical conclusion.

midnight rambler
2nd June 2017, 05:42 AM
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?6

Another day in Islamic paradise.


http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?7

Neuro
2nd June 2017, 05:53 AM
LOL

One of the most respected extra-Quranical texts is intended to "steer people away from Islam." LOL

AGAIN:

The Quran asserts Allah is the best of deceivers.

The Bible states Satan is the best of deceivers.

Make the logical conclusion.

He can't make ANY logical conclusions this month. He isn't drinking any water from 3:30 AM to 10 PM (Oslo) or perhaps not at all if he is in North Norway.

Norweger
2nd June 2017, 10:06 AM
The answer to that stupid question is that if God wanted to deceive anyone he would do a better job than any of his creation.


He can't make ANY logical conclusions this month. He isn't drinking any water from 3:30 AM to 10 PM (Oslo) or perhaps not at all if he is in North Norway.

Well, that is better than some of this forum that cant make any logical conclusions all of the year.

Norweger
2nd June 2017, 10:07 AM
Another day in Islamic paradise.


http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?7

And how many joos are working on their nobel peace price?

7th trump
2nd June 2017, 10:13 AM
And how many joos are working on their nobel peace price?

What do jews have to do with the Islamic 33 attacks and the 416 deaths?
Why do you bring the jews in this?

Norweger
2nd June 2017, 10:15 AM
What do jews have to do with the Islamic 33 attacks and the 416 deaths?
Why do you bring the jews in this?

The site he get's the information from boasts about joos working on their next nobel price. Who benefits from this image the media is creating of muslims? Israel and world jewry that's who.

It is fascinating to watch how closely some who claim to be aware of the jewish question allign themselves with them when it comes to muslims and islam.

Norweger
2nd June 2017, 10:24 AM
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Islam-Judaism.jpg

In 2007, Islam and Judaism's holiest
holidays overlapped for 10 days.
Muslims racked up 397 dead bodies
in 94 terror attacks across 10 countries
during this time... while Jews
worked on their 159th Nobel Prize.

Neuro
2nd June 2017, 10:25 AM
Well, that is better than some of this forum that cant make any logical conclusions all of the year.
You don't live in Tromsø or in Longyearbyen do you? You wouldn't be able to post if you did, if you still managed to be alive... Obviously Allah didn't intend for muslims to live close to the polar circle with the rule not to eat and drink while the sun is still up during Ramadan month. Or did you finally move to your brothers in Saudi Arabia?

midnight rambler
2nd June 2017, 10:28 AM
The info coming from an apparent joo loving website DOES NOT negate the facts surrounding a death cult of inbred moronic goatfuckers hellbent on destroying all that is good and wholesome in the name of their god Satan.

Norweger
2nd June 2017, 10:31 AM
The info coming from an apparent joo loving website DOES NOT negate the facts surrounding a death cult of inbred moronic goatfuckers hellbent on destroying all that is good and wholesome in the name of their god Satan.

Jews are so trustworthy...

Why do you feel the need to use profanities all the time?

Norweger
2nd June 2017, 10:39 AM
You don't live in Tromsø or in Longyearbyen do you? You wouldn't be able to post if you did, if you still managed to be alive... Obviously Allah didn't intend for muslims to live close to the polar circle with the rule not to eat and drink while the sun is still up during Ramadan month. Or did you finally move to your brothers in Saudi Arabia?

People who live where the sun don't set usually follow the time in Mecca.

Ares
2nd June 2017, 10:44 AM
Jews are so trustworthy...

Why do you feel the need to use profanities all the time?

Those pesky vile jews, making these pure souls and followers of MoHAMmad (may PISS be upon him) have sex with a donkey.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=9056&d=1496425315

Islamic believers aren't the sharpest of the bunch. All the worlds problems are the Jews (they definitely do a lot of the wrong in this world) according to them, but Islamic followers also lack self reflection in any meaningful way.

No one is at fault but some body else.


Sounds like another undesirable race that we have a problem with in the United States.

Norweger
2nd June 2017, 10:58 AM
I'm sure there are several photos like that of Americans doing similar acts on animals, but i won't go as far as to call it a christian act even though america on paper is a christian nation.

Again with the profanities.

Neuro
2nd June 2017, 11:24 AM
People who live where the sun don't set usually follow the time in Mecca.

In contradiction to the Koran?

Twisted Titan
2nd June 2017, 09:26 PM
I'm sure there are several photos like that of Americans doing similar acts on animals, but i won't go as far as to call it a christian act even though america on paper is a christian nation.
.



Leviticus 20:15


“And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.”






My faith recognizes this abomination for what it is and has the remedy to quickly put the evil away

midnight rambler
3rd June 2017, 03:14 AM
Jews are so trustworthy...

Why do you feel the need to use profanities all the time?

Why do the follows of Allah aka Satan feel the need to kill disbelievers?

midnight rambler
3rd June 2017, 03:17 AM
I'm sure there are several photos like that of Americans doing similar acts on animals, but i won't go as far as to call it a christian act even though america on paper is a christian nation.

There may be Sodomites who practice such abominations in the US of A however only the mooooozlims are so proud of sodomizing farm animals they do so in groups taking turns while taking photos. lol

osoab
3rd June 2017, 04:29 AM
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4YrRHAqKqRA/UABljKG7xYI/AAAAAAAAA_o/nETftkuxnHk/s1600/clerks2qv2.jpg





http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=9056&d=1496425315

crimethink
3rd June 2017, 08:09 AM
I'm sure there are several photos like that of Americans doing similar acts on animals, but i won't go as far as to call it a christian act even though america on paper is a christian nation.


America has never been a "Christian nation."

But Americans used to be, generally, a moral people. And when they were, they weren't fucking animals. However, since the time of the Pedophile Muhammad, Muslims have been known to have "relations" with animals, as a norm.

Not ironically, the rise of sexual perversion in America has occurred simultaneously with the tolerance/acceptance of Islam in America. Degeneracy loves company.




Again with the profanities.

Islam itself is obscene. But you are offended by mere colorful words.

crimethink
3rd June 2017, 08:13 AM
There may be Sodomites who practice such abominations in the US of A however only the mooooozlims are so proud of sodomizing farm animals they do so in groups taking turns while taking photos. lol

We had a family friend who was in the Air Force way back when, who was stationed in Morocco. He was pulling AP/SP night watch duty one night, and came upon a Muslim native having "relations" with a camel. At gunpoint, he asked him what in Hell he was doing. The Muslim responded, "I am sorry, but this is something we do in our country."

Jewboo
3rd June 2017, 08:27 AM
Who benefits from this image the media is creating of muslims? Israel and world jewry that's who.



http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-w2h9Gha2Sl8/VkmAh-kk9II/AAAAAAAA4ME/oxbuNCX4Ubg/s1600/Girls-standing-with-sign-welcoming-migrants-70132.jpg

https://black-mosquito.org/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/image/1000x1320/e9c3970ab036de70892d86c6d221abfe/2/0/2013_05_bm_refugees_a3_.jpg




Jew Media Images are the cause of this:














https://i.ytimg.com/vi/L96n3fUzC8o/hqdefault.jpg
Norwigger The Welcoming Muslim Convert


:rolleyes:

midnight rambler
3rd June 2017, 04:45 PM
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?8

Glass
3rd June 2017, 05:56 PM
we might have to wait for up to a year to get the US and allies contribution to the terror death tally. 225 April 23 - May 25. Attack kill ratio is obviously much better. No reports yet for Ramadan.

crimethink
3rd June 2017, 07:13 PM
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?8

Does that include London, tonight?

midnight rambler
3rd June 2017, 07:17 PM
Does that include London, tonight?

No. This stat is from this morning.

midnight rambler
4th June 2017, 12:51 PM
http://thereligionofpeace.com/images/Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?9

Joshua01
5th June 2017, 06:48 AM
This is almost as much fun as watching the Chicongo nignog shootings numbers go up up up

osoab
9th June 2017, 06:02 PM
Ramadan Rage 2017 Hits Grim Milestone: 1,003 Dead, 1,036 Wounded (http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/06/07/ramadan-rage-2017-complete-list-jihadist-attacks-around-world/)


Welcome to Breitbart News’s running tally of worldwide jihadist terrorist attacks during Ramadan 2017. Check back for updates through the end of the Islamic holy month on June 24. The death toll in the first 14 days of holiest month for Muslims has reached a grim milestone: more than 70 attacks in 21 predominantly Muslim countries have yielded an estimated 1,003 fatalities and 1,036 injuries.