PDA

View Full Version : State Department probes Clinton handling of government emails, could pull her securit



Cebu_4_2
20th June 2017, 04:12 PM
State Department probes Clinton handling of government emails, could pull her security clearance

The State Department has opened a formal inquiry into whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her aides mishandled classified information while she was the nation’s top diplomat, Fox News has learned. Despite being under investigation, Clinton and her staffers still have security clearances to access sensitive government information.

The department’s investigation aims to determine whether Clinton and her closest aides violated government protocols by using her private server to receive, hold and transmit classified and top-secret government documents. The department declined to say when its inquiry began, but it follows the conclusion of the FBI’s probe into the matter, which did not result in any actions being taken against Clinton or any of her aides.

Depending on the outcome of the current State Department inquiry, Clinton and her aides could have their access to sensitive government documents terminated.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, confirmed to Fox News the department’s formal inquiry.

Meanwhile, Grassley’s committee launched its own inquiry into Clinton’s handling of emails, an inquiry that began in March. Grassley cited among his concerns the July 5 statement of former FBI Director James Comey that the agency found Clinton and her staff members were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.” Grassley also contended there is “evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information...”

During the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s use of top-secret and classified information on her private server, Comey said there were seven email chains on Clinton’s computer that were classified at the “Top Secret/Special Access Program level.” Another 2,000 emails on her private server were found to have contained information deemed classified now, though not marked classified when sent. In addition, the server also contained 22 top-secret emails deemed too damaging to national security to be released.

Clinton’s spokesperson, Nick Merrill, told Fox News that the investigation into Clinton’s mishandling of classified information is done.
“Nothing's been more thoroughly dissected. It's over. Case closed. Literally,” said Merrill.
That's not a universally held view.

Chris Farrell, of Judicial Watch, a conservative Washington-based government watchdog that has filed a number of lawsuits related to the Clinton email scandal, said he believes Clinton and her “circle of national security criminals” should not have access to any classified information for any reason.
“Their conduct has cost them that privileged position of special trust and confidence,” Farrell said.

Any other government employee would have been prosecuted under 18 USC Sec. 793(f) (“Mishandling National Defense Information”) and be subject to a long prison sentence and large fines, Farrell added.

“This flagrant double standard for the gang that exposed Top Secret Codeword material to the Russians, Chinese and others is both offensive and deeply corrosive to the intelligence community,” Farrell said. “There is no better evidence that when it comes to Hillary Clinton and her côtèrie — laws are for the little people.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/20/state-department-probes-clinton-handling-government-emails-could-pull-her-security-clearance.html

Cebu_4_2
20th June 2017, 04:14 PM
Why does she still have access?


Clinton and her aides could have their access to sensitive government documents terminated.

crimethink
20th June 2017, 06:47 PM
Why does she still have access?

Indeed. Should have been terminated years ago, or, at the latest, January 20th.

Cebu_4_2
20th June 2017, 07:07 PM
Indeed. Should have been terminated years ago, or, at the latest, January 20th.


Kinda shows that no one without power can do anything. Clittons should have been done a while ago and had zero access.

Joshua01
21st June 2017, 05:09 AM
Talk is cheap. I want to see Clinton in irons

PatColo
11th August 2017, 03:21 AM
Dave Hodges Common Sense Show; particularly shameless with the infomercial here, can kill it at 2:20 coz the latter >half is all ad! :(


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OTEBoo0mrlA/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCNACELwBSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLDyyP5liaIe0S3i__BiJzcVCKm9yQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTEBoo0mrlA) 4:53
Breaking-Hillary Offered Plea Deal By AG Sessions (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTEBoo0mrlA)

432 views
52 minutes ago

monty
29th September 2019, 10:46 AM
Apparently this is still an ongoing investigation~Headlines with a Voice


http://youtu.be/kzc1sWkbTLc

https://youtu.be/kzc1sWkbTLc

woodman
29th September 2019, 03:50 PM
Back in the day there was talk of Ted Kennedy running. I started to see 'Ted Kennedy For Lifegaurd' bumper stickers. Effective. We need to create and disseminate 'Hillary Clinton For Postmaster General' bumperstickers. You know, a jab at her inability to keep any mail safe, especially State Secrets.

Amanda
30th September 2019, 04:35 PM
Okay, found this comment somewhere (zero or treehouse) and thought it was interesting:



1.) When clintonmail server was discovered, a warrant should have been served, and the server seized. Instead, congress issued an "order to preserve".


2.) Instead of a Congressional subpoena to get the e-mails, an actual court order or search warrant should have been used. The ISP that the server was connected to should have been subpoenaed, any other servers or back-up services/ servers should have been seized. With ISP info you could copy any copies of the e-mails that still existed in cache or DNS servers.


3.)All of this should have been done to track all senders/recipients. Their e-mails should then have been searched for e-mails to/from Clinton.


This would have been easier and quicker than "going through millions of e-mails". Doing things with the digital copies, rather than printing everything to paper and sifting through it makes a difference too.

99% of every e-mail could have been captured this way. It's what would be done for any of us. It's what was done to the Prez since 2016.

Congress did not want the public to understand what was happening. They already knew what was going on with the secret server. Many of them had probably communicated through it.

Crowdstrike has all the Hillary E-mails because they were the source, the Internet that Hillary used !

Crowdstrike is a Internet Security firm ( think virus protection ) based in California, that provided Hillary a Covert Stealth stand-alone Server equipped with a gmail.com (http://gmail.com) e-mail address ( Bleach Bit is a misnomer, a Lie, all the Networks Network. ) and Crowdstrike cannot edit thru Hillary to cover-up because Crowdstrike bounced thru the Ukrainian Internet who also has every single gmail.com (http://gmail.com) Hillary e-mail ever sent or received, as does China ( but for the first 3 ) who sold selective Hillary e-mails Worldwide profiteering including to Russia!


This has all been opensource, except for Crowdstrike bouncing off of the Ukrainian Internet System, that was uniquely done just for Hillary and the Ukraine gave-up Hillary, and that is the topper on the icing on the cake !



So Ukraine and China have all her emails????????????

Jewboo
30th September 2019, 04:50 PM
We need to remember that JEW OLIGARCHY now completely owns and controls goyim Ukraine and their recent "elected" president is literally a jew stand up comic. (https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/283824/ukraine-president-jewish-comedian)

Amanda
30th September 2019, 04:54 PM
We need to remember that JEW OLIGARCHY now completely owns and controls goyim Ukraine and their recent "elected" president is literally a jew stand up comic.

Yes, and there was even something over at zerohedge, basically explaining why even though Zelensky seemed to want to cooperate with Trump on the whole crowdstrike/Ukranian meddling in the US 2016 election (with the DNC and Killary), doing so would be highly complicated for him b/c he would be going against?/implicating his previous benefactor.

Time will tell.

monty
30th September 2019, 06:14 PM
Yes, and there was even something over at zerohedge, basically explaining why even though Zelensky seemed to want to cooperate with Trump on the whole crowdstrike/Ukranian meddling in the US 2016 election (with the DNC and Killary), doing so would be highly complicated for him b/c he would be going against?/implicating his previous benefactor.

Time will tell.

A few days ago Stranahan made a comment that he [Zelensky] is basicly powerless/irrelevant.

I don't remember the exact words he used.