PDA

View Full Version : Would you accept $4499.33 to be deliberately infected?



singular_me
24th June 2017, 03:41 AM
if the majority was a lot smarter and knew the innerworkings of money, would booms be ever possible ?
ignorance about money prompts ppl do stupid things. The problem is that ignorance affects us all in the end.
=======================================
We all put a price on our health, whether it’s our willingness to shell out a few extra dollars for organic fruit at the store or deciding that yoga classes are a good investment. However, have you ever thought about the opposite side of the coin? Would you accept a sizable sum of money to put your health at risk? That’s exactly what some Southampton University researchers are counting on.

In an effort to make an improved vaccine to “protect” vulnerable parties against whooping cough, the researchers are looking to pay people as much as £3,526 ($4499.33 at today’s exchange rate) to be infected with the disease and then live in isolation units for 17 days. This means that not only do volunteers get sick on purpose, but they also get to help create dangerous vaccines that parents will be strong-armed into giving their children for years to come. There’s not enough money in the world to convince some of us to take part in such a scheme, but they probably won’t have too much trouble getting enough people to sign up given the financial incentive.’

Read more: Would you accept $4499.33 to be deliberately infected with whooping cough?
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-06-22-would-you-accept-4499-33-to-be-deliberately-infected-with-whooping-cough.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-40258553

StreetsOfGold
24th June 2017, 06:19 AM
Read between the line.
Those being "tested" will be WILLING volunteers or UNwilling "volunteers"

crimethink
24th June 2017, 08:28 AM
$4500, while the pharmacide corporation makes 100 times that off the work, per capita, of the guinea pigs.