Little Kim watches the markets during his launches.

[old steel]

Kim Jung-un watches his launch, but on the screen you will notice charts of markets. He is clearly trying to disrupt the financial markets with the launching missiles.

Is North Korea playing inside-trading with secret proxy accounts?






https://armstrongmedia.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Kim-Watching-Markets.jpg


https://armstrongmedia.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Kim-Watching-Markets-Detail.jpg


You really cannot tell which markets he is following. It appears the left three are dropping and the right three are basing poised to rally.



https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/kim-jung-un-watches-markets-during-his-launches/

[old steel]

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/874276197357596672/kUuht00m_normal.jpgDonald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump) The U.S. has been talking to North Korea, and paying them extortion money, for 25 years. Talking is not the answer!
6:47 AM - Aug 30, 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/902875515534626817)


6,201 6,201 Replies (https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?in_reply_to=902875515534626817)
7,459 7,459 Retweets (https://twitter.com/intent/retweet?tweet_id=902875515534626817)
61,760 (https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=902875515534626817)

[old steel]

F. William Engdahl says North Korea is an Pentagon Vassal State and Kim Jong Un is their man.

https://journal-neo.org/2016/11/01/north-korea-is-an-pentagon-vassal-state/ (https://journal-neo.org/2016/11/01/north-korea-is-an-pentagon-vassal-state/)

[crimethink]

F. William Engdahl says North Korea is an Pentagon Vassal State and Kim Jong Un is their man.

https://journal-neo.org/2016/11/01/north-korea-is-an-pentagon-vassal-state/ (https://journal-neo.org/2016/11/01/north-korea-is-an-pentagon-vassal-state/)

Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.


It makes no sense not to simply "neutralize" (assassinate) Fat Boy Kim if he is truly such a threat to world peace. So what is the basis for the US Federal regime's refusal to do just that? "The law"? LOL - "the Law" hasn't stopped and doesn't stop the Federal regime from murdering millions of people. And besides, "the Law" is actually just an Executive Order, rescindable with the stroke of a pen.

Obviously, if a genuine enemy of America could assassinate the President, they would, but security prevents that. So the "argument" that banning assassination prevents counter-assassination is false.

Hence, the logical presumption is one of two things: 1) the "threat" is not actually a threat, and/or 2) the "threat" is actually a controlled asset, a bogeyman.

[cheka.]

scaremongering same b.s. since 1968 (at least)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fi1KpGZlpc8