PDA

View Full Version : The future of cars is here



EE_
11th September 2017, 08:43 PM
Car chases will soon be a thing of the past, don't make your payment we'll shut your car off, don't pay a traffic ticket we'll shut you off. Try to defeat the system we will know. Who knows what else?

Tesla Unleashes Model S, Model X 60/60D Full Battery Capacity To Help FL Drivers Escape Irma’s Wrath
September 10, 2017
Simon Alvarez

Model S and Model X 60 and 60D owners in Florida recently received an unexpected surprise, as Tesla rolled out an unannounced software update that enabled their vehicles to unlock the full capacity of their battery packs. The recent OTA update ultimately gave Model S/X 60/60D owners an additional 40 miles of range, enabling Tesla drivers to escape Hurricane Irma’s wrath more effectively.

The update was rolled out to owners of Tesla Model S/X 60/60D vehicles in the state’s evacuation zones. These cars were originally equipped with a 75kWh battery pack but were limited to 60kWh through a software lock.

Owners of the 60D series could fully unlock their EV’s battery capacity at a later time, though the upgrade costs a premium of around $4,500 to $9,000, as stated in a Teslarati report. The software-locked versions of the Model S/X 60/60D were sold at a lower price, however, which enabled customers to acquire a more premium variant of the carmaker’s vehicles at a discount.

On Saturday, however, owners of Model S/X 60/60D units were pleasantly surprised to see that their vehicles now had an extra 40 miles of range. Drivers also noticed that a “75” badge had appeared in their car’s software menu.

As it turned out, Tesla initiated the sudden unlocking of all Model S/X 60/60D units in Florida as an emergency measure to aid drivers in the state’s hurricane evacuation zones. According to an Electrek report, a Tesla representative confirmed that the extended range of the company’s Model S/X 60/60D units were intentionally rolled out to drivers who were in the path of Hurricane Irma.

While the unlocked batteries of the EVs only give drivers an additional 40 miles of range, it was nonetheless well appreciated by Tesla owners in the state. After all, in the face of natural disasters like Hurricane Irma, every extra single mile from an electric vehicle is valuable.

Hurricane Irma is arguably the largest and most daunting hurricane to hit the United States in years, with the weather disturbance wreaking havoc on all the places it has passed through so far. Its impending arrival has caused a panic-buying spree among car owners, with gas stations in the state’s affected areas running out of petrol as hundreds of drivers tried to purchase as much fuel as they could.

So far, most Tesla Superchargers in Florida remain online. As of writing, only two stations are compromised in the state, with the Supercharger in the Florida Keys being offline and the station in Myers showing “reduced service.”

https://www.inquisitr.com/4488189/tesla-unleashes-model-s-model-x-battery-capacity-evacuation/

Dogman
11th September 2017, 08:56 PM
Depending an if the manufacturer include it.

But have no doubt in time all will join the Fandango.

Legitimate nothing to hide no worry's,

Others need to worry

vacuum
11th September 2017, 09:10 PM
There was a time when I thought Teslas were pretty cool cars.

But the whole thing with OTA updates and everything being proprietary really just doesn't do it for me.

I like and will stick with ICE technology.

Horn
12th September 2017, 12:26 AM
Hurricane Irma is arguably the largest and most daunting hurricane to hit the United States in years, with the weather disturbance wreaking havoc on all the places it has passed through so far. Its impending arrival has caused a panic-buying spree among car owners, with gas stations in the state’s affected areas running out of petrol as hundreds of drivers tried to purchase as much fuel as they could.

Really?

Hopefully, they all drive thru 3ft. of water while panicking and become electrocuted by their car.

hoarder
12th September 2017, 08:23 AM
don't make your payment we'll shut your car offWhat it's really all about. Absolute obedience to bankers. Slavery by agreement.

Neuro
12th September 2017, 08:46 AM
So previously they were charging $4,500 to $9,000 to do that button pressing update, which now is for free. In one word: Thieves!

And they expect people to be grateful for doing it for free now!

EE_
13th September 2017, 07:17 AM
The NWO future is here. Coming soon, government controlled facial recognition to go with your government controlled car!
You will stand in line to get it!

Facial recognition is here. The iPhone X is just the beginning
Apple’s new smartphone will unlock using face recognition, thanks to infrared and 3D sensors. This technology is spreading – and complacency is not an option
Biometric Hardware
‘Face recognition is already used around the world to examine, investigate, and monitor.’ Photograph: Ian Waldie/Getty Images
Wednesday 13 September 2017 02.00 EDT Last modified on Wednesday 13 September 2017 04.19 EDT

I have a confession to make. I’m a privacy lawyer who researches the risks of face recognition technology – and I will be buying the new iPhone.

Apple’s next generation smartphone will unlock using face recognition, thanks to infrared and 3D sensors within its front-facing camera. Reports indicate that the face scan and unlock system will be almost instantaneous and require no buttons to be pressed, being always “on” and ready to read your face. Android users can expect similar face unlock features as well.

For the millions of people who will soon depend on face recognition to check their email, send a text, or make a call, it will be quick, easy to use, and yes, pretty cool. But as we grow accustomed to fast and accurate face recognition, we cannot become complacent to the serious privacy risks it often poses – or think that all its applications are alike.

Face recognition is already used around the world to examine, investigate, and monitor. In China, police use face recognition to identify and publicly shame people for the crime of jaywalking. In Russia, face recognition has been used to identify anti-corruption protesters, exposing them to intimidation or worse.

In the UK, face recognition was used at an annual West Indian cultural festival to identify revelers in real-time. In the United States, more than half of all American adults are in a face recognition database that can be used for criminal investigations, simply because they have a driver’s license.

Governments are not the only users of face recognition. Retailers use the technology in their stores to identify suspected shoplifters. Social media applications increasingly integrate face recognition into their user experience; one application in Russia allows strangers to find out who you are just by taking your photo.

Different uses of face recognition produce different levels of accuracy, too. The iPhone’s face recognition system may reliably ID us, while also rejecting strangers and nosy friends. We cannot assume the same from other systems.

The more variables in the photo taken – camera distance and angle, lighting, facial pose, photo resolution – the lower the accuracy will be. As a consequence, when used for surveillance, face recognition will perform far less accurately, and make more mistakes, than when used to unlock a smartphone.

Law enforcement systems compensate for this by lowering the match threshold—how much two people have to look alike to be considered a “match.” At a recent biometrics industry conference, one company demonstrated its real-time face recognition surveillance solution, advertised as being able to pick a suspect out of a crowd, by scanning the face of everyone walking by its cameras.

The system was designed so that people who looked 50% or more similar to the wanted suspect were flagged as a possible match. This means that a vast number of “possible matches” will be completely innocent people. These are the face recognition systems where a mistake could mean you are investigated, if not arrested and charged, for a crime you didn’t commit.

At the festival in London late last month, the real-time face recognition system reportedly led to 35 misidentifications and only one “correct” match – an innocent person who was not wanted by the police after all. Officials at the New York Police Department have acknowledged at least five misidentifications by their face recognition system.

If the iPhone’s new system makes this many mistakes, or unlocks for anyone who looks 50% or more similar to the owner, no one will consider it to be acceptable security for our personal information. Fortunately, it almost surely won’t. But for many of the systems we are already subjected to – the deployments of face recognition where we had no choice over whether or not to opt-in – mistakes and misidentifications are unavoidable.

As the smartphone of record, it is almost inevitable that the iPhone’s inclusion of this technology will pave the way for consumers to accept face recognition use elsewhere, even if these other systems are inaccurate, privacy invasive, or otherwise problematic. It’s easy to be comfortable with what’s familiar.

Think about all the places you show your face each day. Should retailers, law enforcement officers, or strangers have the ability to capture your photo, turn it into a biometric, and use it to identify, track, or surveil you? Are these uses of face recognition worth the erosion of our privacy and the persistent risks of misidentification?

Even as we choose to explore the conveniences face recognition can offer, we must be vigilant to its risks. I will, like many people in the coming months, opt in to a face scan every time I want to check the weather, draft a tweet, or make a rare actual phone call.

But even as we embrace its conveniences, we should remain suspicious of the many ways face recognition is used today. Face recognition may well be inevitable. Its risks shouldn’t have to be.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/13/facial-recognition-iphone-x-privacy

This son of a bitch is going to live long enough to realize his globalist dream!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txukr5zgHnw

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:49 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkzpcfY9JAo&vl=en

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:58 PM
Doesn't matter, the herd will do as told and embrace every level of technology that invades their privacy with open arms but take away their cell phones and you will have mass riots on your hands.

I predict no mass rioting against TPTB, none.

EE_
13th September 2017, 01:03 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkzpcfY9JAo&vl=en

I'm about to jump on the crimethink train and wish for total destruction of our planet. I don't want this new world, the NWO!

crimethink
13th September 2017, 04:51 PM
I'm about to jump on the crimethink train and wish for total destruction of our planet. I don't want this new world, the NWO!

If you're on the right side - the side of Yahweh Almighty - you shouldn't fear what must come.

If you like being human, you definitely won't like what (((they))) have planned for us within two generations. If they succeed, the end of humanity (in all senses) will occur.