Log in

View Full Version : Believe your own eyes - 9/11



old steel
12th September 2017, 12:40 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W3y3Qh8R1s


Comments section.

"1. We KNOW there were NO PLANES hijacked and flown into either WTC Tower 1 and or 2.

2. A group from MIT from the IT CGi Department were contracted through DARPA to "holohoax" the planes colliding into the WTC Towers.

3. A TOMAHAWK missile also struck the PENTAGON Accounts Section that KPMG were situated in and have since done all they can to hide thousands of accounts substantiating trillions of dollars in Tax Payers money being funneled off into Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAPs), for Private Contractors within the Secret Space Program (SSP) to continue constructions on OFF WORLD LOCSTATS, and SSP ARV Tech designed for both OFF WORLD commutes and OFF WORLD Ships within the Earth Defence Force (EDF)."

A Veteran/Insider

madfranks
12th September 2017, 08:32 AM
During the first minute of the video, the narrator repeatedly asks how a plane can fly through structural steel. However, the building is not solid structural steel, the steel columns and beams are like a skeleton to the building, with the majority of the walls non-structural aluminum and glass "curtain walls" so yes, the nose of a plane could theoretically be able to fly through the glass segments of the building and come out the other side.

I don't buy the official 9/11 narrative, but this video betrays an ignorance of how buildings are constructed.

old steel
12th September 2017, 10:31 AM
During the first minute of the video, the narrator repeatedly asks how a plane can fly through structural steel. However, the building is not solid structural steel, the steel columns and beams are like a skeleton to the building, with the majority of the walls non-structural aluminum and glass "curtain walls" so yes, the nose of a plane could theoretically be able to fly through the glass segments of the building and come out the other side.

I don't buy the official 9/11 narrative, but this video betrays an ignorance of how buildings are constructed.


At 500 miler per hour a desk or metal filing cabinet would tear through that nose like a knife through hot butter and the outside of the building was steel/concrete.

Also consider the angle the supposed plane entered the building and yet the nose comes out perfectly horizontal?


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJcokUBVYAA2Xhq.jpg



This is a hologram, half the tail is missing and it is outside the building.

No visible damage to the skyscraper.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=44&v=re6QX4DM214


Wing disappears while in flight, hologram.

madfranks
12th September 2017, 10:49 AM
I don't buy the hologram theory; there's just too many unknowns for it to be reliable. And no, the exterior of the building was not solid steel/concrete. The vertical cores of the building were (the elevator and stair shafts), but the exterior was a concrete/steel frame, infilled with curtain walls. The majority of the facade by area is glass, not steel/concrete.

If the nose of the plane hit directly into part of the structure, then I imagine it would crumple up, but if it hit glass on the way in and out, then no it would not. Like I said, too many unknowns.

Bigjon
12th September 2017, 10:50 AM
During the first minute of the video, the narrator repeatedly asks how a plane can fly through structural steel. However, the building is not solid structural steel, the steel columns and beams are like a skeleton to the building, with the majority of the walls non-structural aluminum and glass "curtain walls" so yes, the nose of a plane could theoretically be able to fly through the glass segments of the building and come out the other side.

I don't buy the official 9/11 narrative, but this video betrays an ignorance of how buildings are constructed.

The World Trade Center Towers had a special construction in that besides a central core the exterior had what they called an exo-skeleton that was employed to create a column free area around the exterior office space.

The exterior was structural steel columns.

old steel
12th September 2017, 10:59 AM
Those buildings HAD TO COME DOWN, there was no margin for error.

Professional military trained pilots make errors. We are talking about raghead terrorists with zero experience piloting jumbo jets.

Even if you managed to fly planes into those skyscrapers how do you get the buildings to implode into their own footprints to destroy all the evidence?

Only way to be sure those towers were totally destroyed is to demolish them with explosives.

A pilot 4 miles out flying by line of sight is off by half of one degree he misses the target by over a football field.

A plane ends up in the Hudson river with survivors, what then?

A plane explodes into the tower and it remains standing, what then?

Jewboo
12th September 2017, 11:21 AM
Believe your own eyes goyim.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYZsJYZVt5g

old steel
12th September 2017, 11:32 AM
"Angel Is Next"

On the evidence that indicates that not one, not two, but three levels of conspiracy were in play on the history-changing date of September 11, 2001.



Here are the main points that will unfold in this article:


The premise of the book and its relationship to a long-running theme developed by its author.
There were three levels of conspiracy at work on 9/11. The Level 3 faction hijacked Level 2's operation.
"Angel is next" was a transmission that pinpoints the moment when Level 2 saw Level 3.
Russia's intel expert Dr. Tatyana Koryagina has a good idea of who comprises Level 3.
On 9/11, massive transfers of wealth began moving into Level 3, as if a "marker" had come "due." Those transfers exteneded through the financial collapse of 2008 down to this day.
Flashback to that moment in 1944 when the Nazi Party set a plan in motion to "go rogue" and reappear at a future time in the guise of a tightly connected network of trusts and corporations.
The banker who maintained control of Nazi wealth was also the banker for the Bin Laden Group.
Level 3 treated the world to a display of advanced weapons powered by exotic "atmospheric resonant microwave" technology.



http://slaythebankster.com/angel/angel-is-next.html

old steel
12th September 2017, 05:32 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJh3BIWXoAAgm4O.jpg


Pre-collapse Pentagon image. Tailfin impact area. Windows aren't even broken. No plane hit the pentagon.

crimethink
12th September 2017, 05:59 PM
Conspiracy fact: the US Federal regime and Mossad engineered 9/11

Conspiracy falsehood: "no planes were involved" with WTC1 and WTC2

Purpose of falsehoods: confusion, to drive the Goyim away from conspiracy fact

Neuro
12th September 2017, 07:56 PM
Those buildings HAD TO COME DOWN, there was no margin for error.

Professional military trained pilots make errors. We are talking about raghead terrorists with zero experience piloting jumbo jets.

Even if you managed to fly planes into those skyscrapers how do you get the buildings to implode into their own footprints to destroy all the evidence?

Only way to be sure those towers were totally destroyed is to demolish them with explosives.

A pilot 4 miles out flying by line of sight is off by half of one degree he misses the target by over a football field.

A plane ends up in the Hudson river with survivors, what then?

A plane explodes into the tower and it remains standing, what then?

Simple the planes were remote controlled into the WTC buildings probably with the aid of radio beacons planted in the predetermined collapse floor. I don't think anyone here doubts that the buildings were demolished by other forces than the planes. Since they found nanothermite in the dust that fell on lower Manhattan that day. I think that is the most likely method of demolition employed. Further thermite could have easily been installed as fire coating at the initial collapse floors, without the people doing the job even knowing it. Chemically the difference between thermite and firecoating is minute. Trade the aluminum oxide powder in firecoating for aluminum powder, and you have thermite, then you lend out the collapse floors to some Israeli art students that stays there for a week rigging their performance artwork with remote controlled igniters drilled into the firecoated thermite steel beams. The interesting thing is that the same company that sprayed on the thermite on the beams, is the same one that got the job of shipping away the evidence to Chinese melters for destruction!

crimethink
12th September 2017, 08:12 PM
Simple the planes were remote controlled into the WTC buildings probably with the aid of radio beacons planted in the predetermined collapse floor. I don't think anyone here doubts that the buildings were demolished by other forces than the planes. Since they found nanothermite in the dust that fell on lower Manhattan that day. I think that is the most likely method of demolition employed. Further thermite could have easily been installed as fire coating at the initial collapse floors, without the people doing the job even knowing it. Chemically the difference between thermite and firecoating is minute. Trade the aluminum oxide powder in firecoating for aluminum powder, and you have thermite, then you lend out the collapse floors to some Israeli art students that stays there for a week rigging their performance artwork with remote controlled igniters drilled into the firecoated thermite steel beams. The interesting thing is that the same company that sprayed on the thermite on the beams, is the same one that got the job of shipping away the evidence to Chinese melters for destruction!

Of the four incidents, only the impact into the Pentagon did not involve a jetliner (some sort of "aircraft," a cruise missile perhaps, but not a 757).

It is obvious that WTC1 and WTC2 did not come down from jet fuel fires, though jetliners did impact them. Both were designed to withstand direct hits from 707s at full-throttle, which are quite comparable to what did hit them; the crash of a B-25 into the Empire State Building was still in the minds of the WTC designers two decades after.

Remotely-piloted jetliners slamming into the towers is reasonable and plausible. "No jetliners" is unreasonable and insane to most observers; this is deliberate, since the objective is to disparage the conspiracy fact that did happen that day.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash

Joshua01
12th September 2017, 09:30 PM
I have no choice but to agree
Of the four incidents, only the impact into the Pentagon did not involve a jetliner (some sort of "aircraft," a cruise missile perhaps, but not a 757).

It is obvious that WTC1 and WTC2 did not come down from jet fuel fires, though jetliners did impact them. Both were designed to withstand direct hits from 707s at full-throttle, which are quite comparable to what did hit them; the crash of a B-25 into the Empire State Building was still in the minds of the WTC designers two decades after.

Remotely-piloted jetliners slamming into the towers is reasonable and plausible. "No jetliners" is unreasonable and insane to most observers; this is deliberate, since the objective is to disparage the conspiracy fact that did happen that day.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash

Norweger
12th September 2017, 11:17 PM
I'm starting to lean towards no-plane as well. It wouldnt have been any troubles making these videos and sending them live. It doesn't make any sense how the mostly aluminium plane was able to penetrate the buildings.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0

Norweger
12th September 2017, 11:25 PM
Another thing to consider is that they clearly used actors back then as well. The harley guy being the prime example.

I seem to recall one official clip where it's clear that they tampered with the audio, but i cant find it right now.. a video of one of the towers taking a hit and then you hear screaming, but one isolated scream is clearly that of panic-stricken monkey. There is no doubt that they at least did some video fakery.

*edit* found it.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ECK6YVnEjs

Listen at 5 sec and tell me that's not a monkey.

old steel
12th September 2017, 11:30 PM
Conspiracy fact: the US Federal regime and Mossad engineered 9/11

Conspiracy falsehood: "no planes were involved" with WTC1 and WTC2

Purpose of falsehoods: confusion, to drive the Goyim away from conspiracy fact

You got it wrong about the planes CT.

All the Goyim absolutely believe planes were flown into the towers because they saw it on Talmud controlled TV.

Over and over and over again.

Norweger
12th September 2017, 11:37 PM
You got it wrong about the planes CT.

All the Goyim absolutely believe planes were flown into the towers because they saw it on Talmud controlled TV.

Over and over and over again.

Just like the moon landing.

crimethink
12th September 2017, 11:54 PM
It doesn't make any sense how the mostly aluminium plane was able to penetrate the buildings.

High school physics would explain it to you.

Same reason a stick will be rammed through a tree in a hurricane or tornado. Key words: mass, velocity, momentum.


The kinetic energy released by the impact of UA Flight 175 was
= 0.5 x 395,000 x (865)^2/32.174
= 4.593 billion ft lbs force (6,227,270 Kilojoules).

http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/655-faq-9-were-the-twin-towers-designed-to-survive-the-impact-of-the-airplanes.html

crimethink
12th September 2017, 11:57 PM
You got it wrong about the planes CT.

All the Goyim absolutely believe planes were flown into the towers because they saw it on Talmud controlled TV.

Over and over and over again.

You can rationally argue that the planes were piloted by A-rabs with boxcutters, or via remote control, but you cannot rationally argue there were no planes, since there are too many legitimate eyewitnesses.

If there were no planes, why not concoct a video of a third plane hitting WTC7?

old steel
12th September 2017, 11:58 PM
Everything they feed into our minds from an official source is fake.

Lies, followed by more damn lies to confuse the first ones, then more lies to cover those up.

Fake news being thrown out there going back in time all to suit their narrative and agenda.

You think they care or lose one damn second of sleep wondering about what you think you know?

Go back to sleep.

They have a plan and it's being played out right under our noses.

What are you going to do about it? LOLZ!

crimethink
12th September 2017, 11:58 PM
Just like the moon landing.

Two witnesses to each "Moon Landing." No other evidence.

Thousands of witnesses to planes impacting the WTC towers.

crimethink
12th September 2017, 11:59 PM
Everything they feed into our minds from an official source is fake.

Lies, followed by more damn lies to confuse the first ones, then more lies to cover those up.

Fake news being thrown out there going back in time all to suit their narrative and agenda.

You think they care or lose one damn second of sleep wondering about what you think you know?

Go back to sleep.

They have a plan and it's being played out right under our noses.

What are you going to do about it? LOLZ!

One eventually reaches insanity if one dismisses everything that is real and/or can no longer discern what is real and what is fake.

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:01 AM
You can rationally argue that the planes were piloted by A-rabs with boxcutters, or via remote control, but you cannot rationally argue there were no planes, since there are too many legitimate eyewitnesses.

If there were no planes, why not concoct a video of a third plane hitting WTC7?

Cause they can and do anything they want with no repercussions, in your face.

I didn't write the script i just look and see what my lyin' eyes are telling me.

We are two walking dead men disagreeing on how they control and kill us.

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:03 AM
Cause they can and do anything they want with no repercussions, in your face.

I didn't write the script i just look and see what my lyin' eyes are telling me.

We are two walking dead men disagreeing on how they control and kill us.

WTC7 is the smoking gun that proves 9/11 was not how "they" claim it was.

And WTC7 is also the smoking gun that proves "there were no planes, it was all faked video" is bullshit.

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:03 AM
One eventually reaches insanity if one dismisses everything that is real and/or can no longer discern what is real and what is fake.

You're in the matrix like everyone else, caught in the trap like deer in the headlights.

There is nowhere to run.

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:04 AM
You're in the matrix like everyone else, caught in the trap like deer in the headlights.

There is nowhere to run.

I am in the care of Jesus Christ, and "they" do not control me.

Read this again: One eventually reaches insanity if one dismisses everything that is real and/or can no longer discern what is real and what is fake.

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:05 AM
WTC7 is the smoking gun that proves 9/11 was not how "they" claim it was.

And WTC7 is also the smoking gun that proves "there were no planes, it was all faked video" is bullshit.

Yup and Oswald killed Kennedy way back in 1963, another month and they will be running specials all about it, again.

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:08 AM
I am in the care of Jesus Christ, and "they" do not control me.

Read this again: One eventually reaches insanity if one dismisses everything that is real and/or can no longer discern what is real and what is fake.

Yep someone is coming to save your ass, LOL.

That rapture better hurry up and get here soon cause right now, you on your own.

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:10 AM
Yup and Oswald killed Kennedy way back in 1963, another month and they will be running specials all about it, again.

It's very sad you are unable to discern fact from fiction. The absurdities of the JFK ritual sacrifice are self-evident to everyone. "No planes on 9/11" is the absurdity of more recent times.

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:12 AM
Yep someone is coming to save your ass, LOL.

That rapture better hurry up and get here soon cause right now, you on your own.

I am never on my own.

I can fear them, or I can fear the Almighty. I preferred the latter, but found out there is no need to fear Him when you love Him.

Fearing "them" - as you do - only makes them laugh, and have even more contempt for you.

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:15 AM
It's very sad you are unable to discern fact from fiction. The absurdities of the JFK ritual sacrifice are self-evident to everyone. "No planes on 9/11" is the absurdity of more recent times.

Yet the official story never changes and nothing is ever done about it.

The real definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

It will always be the same result with them, they win we all lose.

Noticing a pattern here yet?

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:20 AM
I am never on my own.

I can fear them, or I can fear the Almighty. I preferred the latter, but found out there is no need to fear Him when you love Him.

Fearing "them" - as you do - only makes them laugh, and have even more contempt for you.

Now your confused. Why would i fear them?

They aren't even worth the lead it would take for me to send them to hell.

I would want to do that up close in person, with a blade and i'm no where near a Mexican or a Muslim.

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:25 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJifOl2WAAAauV7.jpg

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:28 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJiWT-bXUAAqWDl.jpg





Lots of Zionists there, tons.

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:48 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJhiS0lVwAET5Td.jpg

Neuro
13th September 2017, 01:01 AM
High school physics would explain it to you.

Same reason a stick will be rammed through a tree in a hurricane or tornado. Key words: mass, velocity, momentum.


The kinetic energy released by the impact of UA Flight 175 was
= 0.5 x 395,000 x (865)^2/32.174
= 4.593 billion ft lbs force (6,227,270 Kilojoules).

http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/655-faq-9-were-the-twin-towers-designed-to-survive-the-impact-of-the-airplanes.html

I just recently watched a Mythbusters episode where a straw was driven through the trunk of a palmtree by hurricane force wind speed. Unless you understand the physics of objects travelling at a high kinetic energy you will not be able to understand this. Hitting the water from a high enough altitude it takes on the property similar to concrete in relation to your body and you break bones. Accept the myth that no planes hit WTC's on the premise that the plane traveling at 550 mph couldn't possibly penetrate the building and you will lose the people that actually can prove physically that the way the towers fell was induced by demolition charges= the perpetrators win.

Besides an explosion is just rapidly expanding gases, how could a gas possibly tear down a wall for instance if aluminum couldn't?

Neuro
13th September 2017, 01:04 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJhiS0lVwAET5Td.jpg

Now that is the truth!

Norweger
13th September 2017, 01:25 AM
High school physics would explain it to you.

Same reason a stick will be rammed through a tree in a hurricane or tornado. Key words: mass, velocity, momentum.


The kinetic energy released by the impact of UA Flight 175 was
= 0.5 x 395,000 x (865)^2/32.174
= 4.593 billion ft lbs force (6,227,270 Kilojoules).

http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/655-faq-9-were-the-twin-towers-designed-to-survive-the-impact-of-the-airplanes.html

Fly an RC plane into a tree.. tell me how it works out.

Norweger
13th September 2017, 01:28 AM
Two witnesses to each "Moon Landing." No other evidence.

Thousands of witnesses to planes impacting the WTC towers.

*actors.

This is also the most used "argument" of those who believe in the holocaust.. b-but what about the witnesses.

Neuro
13th September 2017, 03:43 AM
Fly an RC plane into a tree.. tell me how it works out.

Do you have one capable of 550 mph?

Norweger
13th September 2017, 04:06 AM
Do you have one capable of 550 mph?

Nah, but the denisty of wood makes up for it.

Bigjon
13th September 2017, 09:26 AM
Yep someone is coming to save your ass, LOL.

That rapture better hurry up and get here soon cause right now, you on your own.

Christians have to die to collect the promise, while Jews believe that their reward is now in this life. I think the Jews gave the goyim Christianity.

old steel
13th September 2017, 10:08 AM
Do you have one capable of 550 mph?

Can a 767 Fly 500MPH @ 700ft Altitude? Boeing Official Says: Ha Ha Ha! Not a Chance!


Hear three people speak on the subject:

Retired Aerospace Engineer, Joseph Keith, was the lead engineer designing the "shaker system" for these types of aircraft. He's thoroughly familiar with this topic.

Two Boeing officials, one of them an engineer.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:25 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY

Great video you have there. I'm totally convinced now.

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:28 PM
*actors.

This is also the most used "argument" of those who believe in the holocaust.. b-but what about the witnesses.

Most of what most of the witnesses claimed was true. Concentration camps, Jews marshaled into them, put in barracks, some starved to death or died of disease as consequences of Allies bombing.

Same goes for 9/11. Including watching aircraft impact the towers.

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:31 PM
Christians have to die to collect the promise, while Jews believe that their reward is now in this life.

A Christian's reward is both now and in the future.

Jews believe only in materialism.



I think the Jews gave the goyim Christianity.

Sure, that must be it, why else would Christ call the Talmudists "sons of their father the Devil," or St. John call them "anti-Christs"?

The entire planet was the White race's when it followed Christianity, and we lost it when we abandoned Christianity.

PatColo
13th September 2017, 12:33 PM
I still maintain, NP@WTC = "distraction":

Thread: Critical of JFetzer & JFriend's No Planes @ WTC campaign (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?71312-Critical-of-JFetzer-amp-JFriend-s-No-Planes-WTC-campaign)
& what's important:

Thread: The "Israel did 9/11" Thread (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?23130-The-quot-Israel-did-9-11-quot-Thread)

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:33 PM
Fly an RC plane into a tree.. tell me how it works out.

https://accuweather.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/3914aeb/2147483647/resize/590x/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faccuweather-bsp.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fca%2Fca5e7c68384b691adbc5cb e3a7a20c21%2Fwea00546s.jpg

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/1992andrew8.gif

crimethink
13th September 2017, 12:37 PM
I still maintain, NP@WTC = "distraction"

Not a distraction. Deliberate disinformation.

old steel
13th September 2017, 12:48 PM
Great video you have there. I'm totally convinced now.

It was a great video but pulled like a lot of other great video's.

At the end of it was a newly found eyewitness video of a guy at Ground Zero claiming NO plane, only a bomb!

The info is available online regarding jumbo jets not being able to fly 500+ mph at that low of an altitude due to the higher density of the air.

duckduckgo is your friend.

crimethink
13th September 2017, 01:00 PM
It was a great video but pulled like a lot of other great video's.


Did the Jews pull it just today because you posted it here?




At the end of it was a newly found eyewitness video of a guy at Ground Zero claiming NO plane, only a bomb!


There are also people that claim "scalar wave beams" destroyed the Towers.





duckduckgo is your friend.

Why is a Jewish website my "friend"?

(founded by Gabriel Weinberg)

old steel
13th September 2017, 01:17 PM
Tesla said the power he had discovered was so great that he could split the earth in two with it.

He refused to play ball with TPTB because he said they wanted to use it for military purposes.

He died a penniless man.

Do you believe he was being truthful about what he claimed?

I don't know when the video was deleted but it happens all the time.

SJW's got Hope Hicks twitter account deleted from their complaints today.

New White House Comms Director Hope Hicks "Suspended" From Twitter One Day After Appointment

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/new-white-house-comms-director-suspended-twitter-one-day-after-appointment


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJm4M8LWsAAH1L6.jpg
(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/new-white-house-comms-director-suspended-twitter-one-day-after-appointment)

crimethink
13th September 2017, 04:48 PM
SJW's got Hope Hicks twitter account deleted from their complaints today.

New White House Comms Director Hope Hicks "Suspended" From Twitter One Day After Appointment

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/new-white-house-comms-director-suspended-twitter-one-day-after-appointment


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJm4M8LWsAAH1L6.jpg
(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/new-white-house-comms-director-suspended-twitter-one-day-after-appointment)

Will Trump and Sessions simply retaliate with anti-trust actions?

Neuro
13th September 2017, 10:50 PM
It was a great video but pulled like a lot of other great video's.

At the end of it was a newly found eyewitness video of a guy at Ground Zero claiming NO plane, only a bomb!

The info is available online regarding jumbo jets not being able to fly 500+ mph at that low of an altitude due to the higher density of the air.

duckduckgo is your friend.

They can fly at that speed for short times coming from a higher altitude but with damage to the aircraft.

old steel
13th September 2017, 11:15 PM
Couple more short videos worth watching, the first one is an interview with Donald Trump on September 11, 2001.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w


Then watch this.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhROd7Jt3-w

old steel
16th September 2017, 04:06 PM
For all your truthers out there.

This is gonna hurt.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=509xQgcoMN8


https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-1zseQYVq_eo/VMHCwj0TrJI/AAAAAAAAAFQ/rhBpVx4io48/w530-h814-n/roflbot%2B%25285%2529.jpg

Joshua01
16th September 2017, 08:45 PM
Justice will be done alright. It's just a matter of time

Cebu_4_2
17th September 2017, 12:49 PM
Example, nail gun. Can penetrate concrete but not steel. Try an aluminum nail, total fail. However I have jabbed a straw through a potato.

Harryjalk
17th September 2017, 03:17 PM
I don't believe in 9/11 accident. It was a fake news. It was planed of US government.
I think this kind of activity was created to destroy the image of Muslims in the present world.
I didn't believe that 9/11.
I also don't believe in NASA landed on Moon.
These two games are played by US government.

SockPuppet
17th September 2017, 04:21 PM
NASA didnt land on the moon it was loui armstrong and some other guy.

Cebu_4_2
17th September 2017, 07:47 PM
http://youtu.be/hxPbnFc7iU8
https://youtu.be/hxPbnFc7iU8