PDA

View Full Version : Vote for me because... I thought this was fake but it's not



Cebu_4_2
1st December 2017, 11:38 AM
Michigan Democrat's Attorney General Campaign Ad


http://youtu.be/CQL37wcgI6k

https://youtu.be/CQL37wcgI6k

A Michigan Democrat running for attorney general released a campaign ad this week in which she suggests that not having a penis makes her qualified for the position.

Dana Nessel suggests her answer to stopping sexual harassment in politics is to elect more women because they can be trusted "not to show you their penis in a professional setting."

“If the last few weeks have taught us anything, it’s that we need more women in positions of power, not less,” Nessel says in her ad. “So when you’re choosing Michigan’s next attorney general, ask yourself this: Who can you trust most not to show you their penis in a professional setting? Is it the candidate who doesn’t have a penis? I’d say so.”

“I want to tell you what you can expect me not to do,” Nessel continues. “I will not sexually harass my staff, and I won’t tolerate it in your workplace either. I won’t walk around in a half-open bathrobe, and I’ll continue to take all sex crimes seriously just like I did as a prosecutor.”

Santa
1st December 2017, 12:11 PM
I need to see proof she doesn't have a penis.

Serpo
1st December 2017, 01:40 PM
And a brain is not necessary either.

Joshua01
2nd December 2017, 07:58 AM
I believe she then qualifies!
And a brain is not necessary either.

Neuro
2nd December 2017, 08:29 AM
Well when she slams her cunt in the table like that I wouldn't count on her not sexually harassing her co-conspirators in politics!

osoab
3rd December 2017, 02:55 AM
I need to see proof she doesn't have a penis.

Are you really sure you want to go down that path? I would pay someone to do the deed.

PatColo
3rd December 2017, 04:15 AM
no weiner, fine & good; but does she have the formidable trail of corpses which weinerless(?) killery sports? :(??

Michael O'bummer, different matter.

ziero0
3rd December 2017, 06:49 AM
It is not the penis. It is the nuts (testes). Law is masculine. Equity is female. In male law nuts are required to TESTI-fy. If you don't have any then you cannot provide evidence in a court of masculine law. Such requirement is not essential in a court of equity.

Pretty obviously the lack of nuts and ability to swing a baseball bat are not a serious problem in a chancery environment (which is what equity is).

You might have equity in your house and car but concepts of ownership are missing. As Obama would say "you didn't build that" so it follows "you don't own that".