PDA

View Full Version : With or Without The Eletric Universe Theory, The Model To Fall Apart Anyway?



singular_me
2nd December 2017, 03:16 PM
they just flushed down the toilet what has been taken for at least the last 100 years...

look at nature: (as in the heavens, so on earth... as above so below)

Meteorologists estimate that, at any given moment, some 1,800 thunderstorms are in progress over Earth's surface

INCREDIBLE Upward Lightning (Ground to Cloud) - May 18, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqnQXRaSw28


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDDfkKEa2ls


A Shocker: Solar Wind Provokes Lightning on Earth | Space News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67wOTlKmeoA


=====================
Dark Matter and Dark Energy Might Not Exist—Potentially Forcing a Rethink of Our Understanding of the Entire Universe
By Kevin Pimbblet On 12/1/17 at 8:18 AM
Dark matter and dark energy are mysterious, unknown substances that are thought to make up more than 96 percent of the universe. While we may have never directly seen them, they beautifully explain how stars and galaxies move and how the universe is expanding. But a new study, published in The Astrophysical Journal, suggests they may not exist after all.... The new study by André Maeder, an honorary astronomy professor at the University of Geneva, centers around something called “scale invariance." Scale invariance means that the properties of a given law of physics (or set of physical objects) do not change, even if we were to multiply their lengths or energies by some number. They are the same, independent of scale. As an example of a very specific type of scale invariance, think of a fractal. Even if we zoom in by some set magnification, the shape of the fractal will remain the same............
http://www.newsweek.com/dark-matter-dark-energy-dont-exist-rethink-understanding-universe-728090


David Talbott: Exposing the Myths of "Settled Science"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aLCWwLdelo


Manly P Hall in "I beg to differ with Darwinian theory"

@42mins: science does not exist to create profits, nor glorify itself but the betterment of humanity... or it will destroy itself

@1:11mins: The role of religion is to learn how to use wisely and unselfishly all the skills of mankind.

singular_me
3rd December 2017, 02:03 AM
it is generally how the academia works... gradually making a theory irrelevant, then coming up with new possibilities and after a while imposing a new model. Think of all those college degrees that just got destroyed.

however, the EU - electric universe - theory does not endorse dark matter/energy... so now the door is open for the EU theory to have a say and gain attention

Bigjon
3rd December 2017, 11:16 AM
James McCanney is the originator of the term Electric Universe.

D Talbot is a cia funded misinfo website to discredit and steal the work of James McCanney.

http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/

singular_me
3rd December 2017, 11:30 AM
thanks for the data... but that does not invalidated the EU theory, dont see how talbot could discredit it though... hope justice will be done. I know I just posted about Talbott but I usually watch http://www.thunderbolts.info and Thornhill

tesla and walter russell are both pioneers in the field too by the way. Russell's work is my template however

The Electric Nature of the Universe By Walter Russell
https://www.philosophy.org/store/p38/The_Electric_Nature_of_the_Universe.html

please note in the OP, they speak of fractals

The Holographic Electric Universe
Robert Ottey amd matt presti are both russellian

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEhL3Qm-0Ck

Part. 1-Electric Universe/Optics and Creation Mechanics- Matt Presti and Darren Colomb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPfHUAKnLgI

Electric Universe, Project Thunderbolt. Holoscience, Wal Thornhill
leakproject

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Yt55Y-A6rs



James McCanney is the originator of the term Electric Universe.

D Talbot is a cia funded misinfo website to discredit and steal the work of James McCanney.

http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/

Bigjon
3rd December 2017, 01:04 PM
Good disinfo tells mostly the truth with a few lies interspersed to poison the well.

If they were an honest website they would acknowledge the pioneering work by McCanney.

They do nothing like that.

How do they support themselves? They have a slick website and many polished videos that require a staff of trained professionals to carry off such an operation.

Their whole operation is to provide breadcrumbs to lead you away from McCanney's work.

http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/
Only here will you learn the whole truth about how the Electric Universe works.
McCanney obviously does not have a polished website or slick video's as he has to sell water filters to keep the lights on.
He does have a number of free audio recordings to listen to.
http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/WeeklyRadioShowArchivesSubPage.HTM

Uncle Salty
4th December 2017, 01:17 PM
The flat earth reveal is going to fuck up more than just dark matter or the electric universe.

It's going to reveal God. Ha ha ha. God created all this and the secular humanists/atheists can suck my God given cock.

Horn
4th December 2017, 02:01 PM
The flat earth reveal is going to fuck up more than just dark matter or the electric universe.

It's going to reveal God. Ha ha ha. God created all this and the secular humanists/atheists can suck my God given cock.

And some wonder why his followers have been subject of derision...

Uncle Salty
4th December 2017, 02:05 PM
And some wonder why his followers have been subject of derision...

It's too late in the game to pull punches.

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

You gotta fight fire with fire now. The truth needs to shock.

I am making no sense. I get that. It's a koan that's never been read.

Horn
4th December 2017, 02:12 PM
I understand Salty, I'm tired too of all the utter bullshit.

Even if something has 2 legs and walks well anymore it has a hard time of getting off the ground.

I've stopped pointing any fingers and can only hint at positive things anymore.

Jewboo
4th December 2017, 02:20 PM
God created all this and the secular humanists/atheists can suck my God given cock.



https://akphoto4.ask.fm/610/007/737/-519996979-1t0anqe-en18tc531rpa5gk/original/avatar.jpg

:rolleyes:

Uncle Salty
4th December 2017, 02:26 PM
I understand Salty, I'm tired too of all the utter bullshit.

Even if something has 2 legs and walks well anymore it has a hard time of getting off the ground.

I've stopped pointing any fingers and can only hint at positive things anymore.

This world is so fucked up it's beyond comprehension.

I think at this point only the ignorant can stay sane.

osoab
4th December 2017, 04:06 PM
This world is so fucked up it's beyond comprehension.

I think at this point only the ignorant can stay sane.

It's up to who is defining sanity.

Bigjon
5th December 2017, 08:25 AM
The flat earth reveal is going to fuck up more than just dark matter or the electric universe.

It's going to reveal God. Ha ha ha. God created all this and the secular humanists/atheists can suck my God given cock.

It is interesting that in a recent McCanney radio show he delves into the flat earth theory and tells how anyone who wants to, can prove that it's wrong.

Basically if you put a transit-level (https://www.amazon.com/David-White-LT6-900-Meridian-Level-Transit/dp/B01C40E6RQ?SubscriptionId=AKIAILSHYYTFIVPWUY6Q&tag=duckduckgo-d-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B01C40E6RQ) on any high point and aim it at the horizon, you will find that the horizon is below the level point.

http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/JamesMcCanneyScienceHour_November_23_2017.mp3
Explanation begins at 34' 20s mark

Hitch
5th December 2017, 09:57 AM
Basically if you put a transit on any high point and aim it at the horizon, you will find that the horizon is below the level point.



You don't even need a transmitter, you can use height of eye to calculate your position relative to the curvature of the earth. This is what folks do in the maritime industry. Basically, imagine being out at sea and a lighthouse first comes into view on the horizon. Based upon how high you are above the waterline, and the curvature of the earth, you can calculate exactly how far you are away from that lighthouse.

Can't do that if the world was flat, lol. If anyone believes the world is flat, they are admitting they will forever be lost at sea. I'll use the curvature of the earth. I'll calculate exactly my position. Knowing your position at sea is a little bit important.

Horn
5th December 2017, 10:46 AM
Some lighthouse i know of are painted red like only half the way up.

Were the red a Warning sign, when seen?

Or did they use google Flat earth?

Uncle Salty
5th December 2017, 11:41 AM
It is interesting that in a recent McCanney radio show he delves into the flat earth theory and tells how anyone who wants to can prove that it's wrong.

Basically if you put a transit on any high point and aim it at the horizon, you will find that the horizon is below the level point.

http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/JamesMcCanneyScienceHour_November_23_2017.mp3
Explanation begins at 34' 20s mark

He's just plain wrong. The horizon always rises to the level you are looking at. Whether on an airplane at 30,000 feet or 5,000 feet, it always rises with you. You never have to look farther down as you go higher.

Lol, then he says to use a level with water in it. Why? Because water is always flat in any container. Therefore, water can't curve around a ball yet all you globe earthers say it can.

Horn
5th December 2017, 12:10 PM
Salty thinks all lighthouse need only be built 18ft. Off sealevel.

Bigjon
5th December 2017, 12:32 PM
He's just plain wrong. The horizon always rises to the level you are looking at. Whether on an airplane at 30,000 feet or 5,000 feet, it always rises with you. You never have to look farther down as you go higher.

Lol, then he says to use a level with water in it. Why? Because water is always flat in any container. Therefore, water can't curve around a ball yet all you globe earthers say it can.

The horizon has an edge that move further out the higher you go. If you are not using a measuring instrument to tell you what the gravitational level line of sight is, your observation does not mean anything as it references nothing. Just the fact that the horizon moves further out as the hight increases, tells us that the earth is a globe.

But like McCanney says if you want to believe the earth is flat. Have a ball (pun intended).

Hitch
5th December 2017, 02:50 PM
Salty thinks all lighthouse need only be built 18ft. Off sealevel.

I think he's lost at sea. An 18 foot lighthouse is still visible 18 feet if you are 2 miles away or 10 miles to the flat earthers....

I don't get it. Mariners have proven time and time again the world is a globe. Take the Cape Horn in at the very southern tip of South America. This is arguably the world's rough sea to go around. The reason why, is once you go around that cape, if you sailed due east and kept sailing east you'd go around the world and end up right back at Cape Horn. There's no land to block the winds there. It's why the seas are so enormous. It's also why you can sail around the world keeping the same damn compass course.

I'd like to see flat earthers explain that one. I'm starting to think they are just trolls seeking attention, not just stupid people.

Neuro
5th December 2017, 09:35 PM
I think he's lost at sea. An 18 foot lighthouse is still visible 18 feet if you are 2 miles away or 10 miles to the flat earthers....

I don't get it. Mariners have proven time and time again the world is a globe. Take the Cape Horn in at the very southern tip of South America. This is arguably the world's rough sea to go around. The reason why, is once you go around that cape, if you sailed due east and kept sailing east you'd go around the world and end up right back at Cape Horn. There's no land to block the winds there. It's why the seas are so enormous. It's also why you can sail around the world keeping the same damn compass course.

I'd like to see flat earthers explain that one. I'm starting to think they are just trolls seeking attention, not just stupid people.
They didn't measure this correctly at 7800 miles, it is at least 25,000 miles, and they sail at average speeds of over 50 knots in the Southern "Hemisphere"...
http://www.volvooceanrace.com/en/route/leg-7.html

LOL

Uncle Salty
6th December 2017, 11:54 AM
The horizon has an edge that move further out the higher you go.

Exactly. And that can only happen on a flat plane, not a globe.

Were it a globe, we would need to look down, but we don't. The horizon always rises to the eyes.

I love the flat earth.

Ha!

Uncle Salty
6th December 2017, 12:26 PM
I think he's lost at sea.

Funny how so many on this board know we are being lied to, deceived, and manipulated by .gov/corporations yet in the same breath will defend the lie they are being told about the round globe.

NASA is a military institution. It will not give anyone access to its data, experiments, etc.. They just set themselves up as the authority and tell us to believe them.

Photos of the galaxy are all 'artist's interpretations'...you all know that right?

If the earth is flat and there is a firmament, then guess what? There is a God and the bible is correct.

You think our overlords want a God to exist? Ha ha ha.

They want God dead. That is Marxism and we have it. The Flat Earth is God. The round globe earth is atheism and satanism.

Horn
6th December 2017, 12:42 PM
If the earth were a discus, there should be some very heavy yet even beach errosion along Antartica and cliffs the entire perimeter to hold water on the plate.

Bigjon
6th December 2017, 01:45 PM
Exactly. And that can only happen on a flat plane, not a globe.

Were it a globe, we would need to look down, but we don't. The horizon always rises to the eyes.

I love the flat earth.

Ha!

Totally wrong again. If the earth were flat the horizon would always be the same distance, no matter how high you went.

singular_me
7th December 2017, 12:35 AM
well a long while ago, I was able to stare at mars and venus in a home telescope, and both are globes. the moon is too, sun too... why the heck would earth be flat???

I keep it simple

singular_me
24th December 2017, 02:58 AM
When the bible speaks of God as Light, in fact it means Electricity, not ready to worship Electricity/Light just yet? Okay but you will learn about it...

just ran into many interesting links... it is time for mainstream academia to go down in history (and the missing-link-archeology-anthropology cartel will eventually follow, it is just a matter of time)

Dark Matter is Dead | The Missing Matter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuwkbGAnkE0

Reasons You Aren't Crazy: Success in creating an earthquake forecasting model based on electricity. In addition to real-world application- NASA, ETH Zurich are now hot on that trail...

How to Introduce the Observers Community

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-YnnPN6Rts

Sunspots Growing, Climate, Hungry Star | S0 News Dec.23.2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLHSoxioQtwZeQaRnO5_9AJB2RmevUpuPT&v=qyAlfl3cMqM

Other websites:
http://www.Suspicious0bservers.org
http://www.QuakeWatch.net
http://www.ObservatoryProject.com
http://www.EarthChanges.org
http://www.MagneticReversal.org

ALSO SEE: 1HR32MIN DOC Does Electricity Rule the Solar System [FULL VIDEO]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0vu-jQWCZo

The Electric Universe theory highlights the importance of electricity throughout the Universe. Ever wondered why NASA are always puzzled at every new discovery in space, and why its vaunted "experts" are consistently incapable of explaining any phenomenon without recourse to mathematical gymnastics and imaginary constructions pulled from the nearest hat? It's quite simple really: because standard theories are as wrong as it's possible to be, ignoring the presence of electromagnetic forces in favour of gravity, a force 10 to the power of 39 (that's 10 with 39 trailing zeroes) weaker than EM.

Unfortunately, it is becoming increasingly clear that the universe and everything in it is motivated by electricity, and that gravity is simply the observed result of charge differential. Strangely we know (or THINK we know) that subatomic particles such as neutrons, protons and electrons are controlled by electrical forces, yet for some reason this is ignored when we think on bigger scales.

Most people just accept that our universe is ruled by gravity; an assumption that is wrong. Evidence instead shows that the force responsible for all of the objects and events we observe throughout the universe is the electric force that enables current flow and therefore magnetic fields to exist. If we consider that the electric force is fundamentally one thousand, billion, billion, billion, billion times more powerful than gravity and that the universe consists of 99.99% plasma; charged matter through which electric currents flow, then you have good reason to open your mind and watch what this video has to say. . . Subscribe to UAMN TV for more new releases in 2017

Bigjon
24th December 2017, 07:43 PM
http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/JamesMcCanneyScienceHour_December_21_2017.mp3

singular_me
25th December 2017, 02:03 AM
I posted "How to Introduce the Observers Community" based on the website http://www.Suspicious0bservers.org but I just finished watching the video... despite the failure to prove dark matter, they still argue that it may exist, so they do not look ridiculous.

==========================

Dark-Matter Hunt Fails to Find the Elusive Particles
Physicists begin to embrace alternative explanations for the missing material
Nature magazine on November 8, 2017

Physicists are growing ever more frustrated in their hunt for dark matter—the massive but hard-to-detect substance that is thought to comprise 85% of the material Universe. Teams working with the world’s most sensitive dark-matter detectors report that they have failed to find the particles, and that the ongoing drought has challenged theorists’ prevailing views..........

The findings have left researchers struggling for answers. “We do not understand how the Universe works at a deeper and more profound level than most of us care to admit,” says Stacy McGaugh, an astrophysicist at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.........

Physicists have widely accepted the existence of dark matter since the 1980s as an explanation for why galaxies remain intact rather than flying apart, which would be expected given the amount of observable mass they contain and how fast they rotate. Researchers surmised that halos of invisible dark matter surround galaxies and stabilize them. Physicists grew more confident when dark-matter models successfully predicted the fluctuations detected in an observable echo of the Big Bang, known as the cosmic microwave background.............

It has taken decades to build experiments capable of detecting the minuscule rate at which WIMPs were thought to interact with matter. Only in the past ten years have experiments, carried out at about a dozen laboratories, reached the level of sensitivity needed to detect them. The most sensitive detector in the world is Gran Sasso’s XENON1T, which looks for flashes of light created when dark matter interacts with atoms in its 3.5-tonne tank of extremely pure liquid xenon. But the team reported no dark matter from its first run. Neither was there any signal in data collected over two years during the second iteration of China’s PandaX experiment, based in Jinping in Sichuan province..............

The looming rejection of the WIMP hypothesis is encouraging for the few physicists who claim that dark matter itself is a red herring. “I hope people will become even more open-minded,” says McGaugh, who has studied modified versions of gravity that negate the need for dark matter. However, Hooper stresses that the fading support for WIMPs does not weaken the case for dark matter, which he thinks will eventually be found. “I’m not worried about the never possibility, but it could be very, very difficult,” he says.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-matter-hunt-fails-to-find-the-elusive-particles/