What sort of feminism is that...?

[midnight rambler]

Heard the term from a couple of the interviewees in the recent protest march, thought I heard 'intersexual' but it's not.

This article about the matter from early last year -

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/19/feminism-intersectionality-racism-sexism-class/96633750/

[ziero0]

If feminism is advocating for women's rights and equality between the sexes, intersectional feminism is the understanding of how women's overlapping identities — including race, class, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation — impact the way they experience oppression and discrimination.

A white woman is penalized by her gender but has the advantage of race. A black woman is disadvantaged by her gender and her race. A Latina lesbian experiences discrimination because of her ethnicity, her gender and her sexual orientation.

Author can't hold a topic. You notice in the first paragraph he writes of the plural WOMEN while in the second paragraph he writes of the singular WOMAN?

Women don't have any rights unless they form a partnership or enter into a corporate agreement and then it is the partnership or corporation that has the rights. The NRA does't have any 2nd amendment rights but the individuals who entered into the membership agreement might. A mob of men don't have any 1st amendment rights to speak but an individual man might. Meanwhile a gaggle of hormonal teenyboppers is just hormonal and lack the logic to protest anything more interesting.

[Joshua01]

The way I see it, if you're not male or female then you aren't human. Aliens pose the ultimate threat to the human race and should be eradicated! But that's just me....I'm kinda crazy like that!;)

[ziero0]

Aliens pose the threat to the human race and should be eradicated!

Here is the definition of 'alien'. Note the first sentence nails the concept that non-citizen is an alien. The alternative is being born in the jurisdiction and subject to all laws (not just single gender laws .... ALL laws)


ALIEN, persons. One born out of the jurisdiction of the United States, who
has not since been naturalized under their constitution and laws. To this
there are some exceptions, as this children of the ministers of the United
States in foreign courts. See Citizen, Inhabitant.
2. Aliens are subject to disabilities, have rights, and are bound to
perform duties, which will be briefly considered. 1. Disabilities. An alien
cannot in general acquire title to real estate by the descent, or by other
mere operation of law; and if he purchase land, he may be divested of the
fee, upon an inquest of office found. To this general rule there are
statutory exceptions in some of the states; in Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Louisiana, New Jersey, Rev. Laws, 604, and Michigan, Rev. St. 266, s. 26,
the disability has been removed; in North Carolina, (but see Mart. R. 48; 3
Dev. R. 138; 2 Hayw. 104, 108; 3 Murph. 194; 4 Dev. 247; Vermont and
Virginia, by constitutional provision; and in Alabama, 3 Stew R. 60;
Connecticut, act of 1824, Stat. tit. Foreigners, 251; Indiana, Rev. Code, a.
3, act of January 25, 1842; Illinois, Kentucky, 1 Litt. 399; 6 Mont. 266
Maine, Rev. St,. tit. 7, c. 93, s. 5 Maryland, act of 1825, ch. 66; 2 Wheat.
259; and Missouri, Rev. Code, 1825, p. 66, by statutory provision it is
partly so.
3. An alien, even after being naturalized, is ineligible to the office
of president of the United States; and in some states, as in New York, to
that of governor; he cannot be a member of congress, till the expiration of
seven years after his naturalization. An alien can exercise no political
rights whatever; he cannot therefore vote at any political election, fill
any office, or serve as a juror. 6 John. R. 332.
4.-2. An alien has a right to acquire personal estate, make and
enforce contracts in relation to the same - he is protected from injuries,
and wrongs, to his person and property, his relative rights and character;
he may sue and be sued.
5.-3. He owes a temporary local allegiance, and his property is
liable to taxation. Aliens are either alien friends or alien enemies. It is
only alien friends who have the rights above enumerated; alien enemies are
incapable, during the existence of war to sue, and may be ordered out of the
country. See generally, 2 Kent. Com. 43 to 63; 1 Vin. Ab. 157; 13 Vin. ab.
414; Bac. Ab. h.t.; 1 Saund. 8, n.2; Wheat. Dig. h.t.; Bouv. Inst. Index,
h.t.

[singular_me]

many facts but often wrong interpretations... society has never taught that male and female genders complete one another (genders cannot compete, dominate one another, both made of same energy but expressing themselves differently), and that is why feminism was so easily implemented, due to centuries of abusive patriarchy and senseless darwinism/competition, of wars killing children and the ensuing generational resentment... swing pendulum, swing, swing....

this feminist takeover is doomed anyway... robot and automation takeover just a few years ahead


"Women are WINNING, Men are FAILING" Tucker Carlson: This is Wrong & Must be Corrected

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D-IwqVpRZI

[Neuro]

A mob of men don't have any 1st amendment rights to speak but an individual man might.
Doesn’t 1 st amendment rights extend to corporations/judicial persons. I would be happy if they didn’t but it is my understanding they do...

[ziero0]

Doesn’t 1 st amendment rights extend to corporations/judicial persons. I would be happy if they didn’t but it is my understanding they do...
Not just the 1st amendment but all of the bill of rights apply ONLY to legal fictions. That includes corporations since the state is involved in the creation of them. In the same sense the state creates the person who attempts to use any aspect of the constitution.

Asserting a right is an action which creates a person in contemplation of that right.

You need to go back to Hobbes Leviathan chapter XVI to understand what a person is and how a person is created. It is the person who is rewarded or punished.

[Neuro]

Not just the 1st amendment but all of the bill of rights apply ONLY to legal fictions. That includes corporations since the state is involved in the creation of them. In the same sense the state creates the person who attempts to use any aspect of the constitution.

Asserting a right is an action which creates a person in contemplation of that right.

You need to go back to Hobbes Leviathan chapter XVI to understand what a person is and how a person is created. It is the person who is rewarded or punished.

Interesting point of view! Can you expand on this in relation to the times the 1st amendment was written? I suppose at those times the only physical people this legal personhood was applied to was free white predominantly male property-/land-owners?

[ziero0]

Interesting point of view! Can you expand on this in relation to the times the 1st amendment was written? I suppose at those times the only physical people this legal personhood was applied to was free white predominantly male property-/land-owners?

Boy Scout rules only apply to boy scouts. I see nothing wrong with a government formed by white males for the administration of white male rules. I see nothing wrong with an ethnic group forming to administrate their own society. This is what the Amish are all about. It is where outside groups come in trying to change the rules to suit them that problems develop. The original founders of the government were white and male. It later morphed into a society for anyone. The newer society points at the founding society and proclaims "these were bigots or racists". We can point at Amish society and say "they don't worship Allah". So what? They were founded on their beliefs and not the beliefs of any other group.

As to personage all governments use Hobbes and his concepts. Prior to Hobbes the concepts of government were more Roman in nature and perhaps not as well defined. If you think about it society either punishes you or rewards you. It does so based upon your person. Your person is your actions and your words. It is also your representatives since they are your agents and act on your behalf. This concept directs your attention to things you can get rewarded for and things you can get punished for. If you don't want either punishment or reward then don't say anything, don't do anything and get rid of all your agents. You create these things and ultimately you are responsible for them.

[Neuro]

We have the absolute freedom of saying and doing absolutely nothing...

[ziero0]

We...
There is no 'we'. That concept presumes that the rights of a committee are greater than the rights of any individual. Quite the opposite are true.

[Neuro]

There is no 'we'. That concept presumes that the rights of a committee are greater than the rights of any individual. Quite the opposite are true.

Yes, we can!

[ziero0]

Yes, we can!
carte de personas please

[Horn]

There is no 'we'. That concept presumes that the rights of a committee are greater than the rights of any individual. Quite the opposite are true.

You're goyim or goy for short, ziero0

Truth

[Neuro]

carte de personas please

Than you satan