Bigjon
26th April 2018, 12:03 PM
From Jim Stone: (http://82.221.129.208/.yz3.html)
Russia's non GMO wheat now accounts for HALF the wheat in the world
This is new to me. I hit This RT report, (https://www.rt.com/business/425050-russian-wheat-export-price-surge/) which states that Russian exports now account for over half of all the wheat sold around the world, and then I thought, Gee, if I remember right, Russia banned GMO's. One quick search of the topic, and Sure enough, they did. (https://theinternationalreporter.org/2016/04/24/russian-organic-wheat-takes-world-by-storm-us-gmo-glyphosate-losing-out/)
So I can happily report that over half the world is not stuck eating Monsanto's synthetic and glyphosate ridden CRAP. Sadly, if you are in America, I can't say that's you.
BURN YOUR U2 CD's!
U2's Bono joined with black south africans in a song about killing whites! Here it is. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qm9nUhTFYfM&ab_channel=EugeneTerreblancheHerinnering)
North Korea nuclear test site collapse
I ignored this, because it has been in the news for six months already. Everyone knew it was coming. And this is probably at least a supplemental reason behind Kim Jong saying he suspended all testing.
No big deal here. All the worries about radioactive releases are bunk. Yes, you might pick something up in China on a 10 digit geiger counter, on the last digit, so you could technically say it was from NK but the amounts of materials used were simply too small to be truly significant, and virtually all of them are now deeply buried.
Kim can find another mountain that already has a tunnel in it and resume. Probably shortly.
The story of Alfie Evans
Alfie Evans is a little British boy who has a brain wasting "disorder" probably caused by tainted vaccines. The family probably does not know vaccines likely caused it, but in relation to what is going on what actually caused it is not very important. The important part of the Alfie Evans story is that it shows how horrible it is when the state gets too powerful. Alfie Evans has been on life support for most of his life, after for unexplained reasons his brain began wasting away at an early age. The british medical system kept him on life support for the past 9 months, and finally decided to pull the plug. In addition to pulling the plug, the doctors got the judge to put out an order disallowing Alfie from being taken anywhere else for treatment.The Vatican became aware of Alfie, and a fundraiser was launched that produced enough to fully fund medical care in Rome. In conjunction with this, Alfie was given citizenship in Italy to help him escape England. But it was not to be -
Rather than allow Alfie to go to Italy for treatment, the doctors took Alfie off life support, saying he'd die in minutes. That did not happen. Alfie continued breathing and stayed alive and is still alive, but has been denied food by the hospital to force him to die from starvation, rather than a need for life support.
RATIONAL CONCLUSION: Alfie was never sick or dying. He was instead an experiment into brain wasting afflictions fronted by three doctors who don't want him taken elsewhere, where their crimes may be discovered. The British government is in on it, because the courts keep ruling that despite the fact he's fully paid and has citizenship elsewhere, he can't go anywhere else for "treatment".
So they are killing him on purpose with methods that would kill any baby, sick or not. That's what tyranny brings people, not only does this speak out against nationalized health care clearly, it proves that in Britain, the state is a tyranny that does whatever the hell it wants with anyone. Obviously they destroyed this kid themselves, and the don't want what they did to be revealed by a legitimate medical team.
The caravans from Mexico
None of them started in Chiapas. There is no practical way to go from the southern border of Mexico to the northern border in less than six months on foot. These are not organic grass roots caravans, they are funded by wealthy people for political purposes. IF there are any real caravans at all. Most likely they organize five miles from the border MAX and consist of people that are paid to do it.
The Unabomber truly understood the leftist mindset!
The Unabomber actually understood leftism well. Perhaps what he did not know was that at the very top, there were people in control who were not following their own mantra, and were using leftism as a weapon of destruction. I did not read his entire manifesto (I do not have time for that, but this section absolutely nails the leftist psy op:
This is surprisingly archived by The New York Times. That's the first accurate thing I have ever seen them do!
FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY
10. By "feelings of inferiority" we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.
11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms "negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world "primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
12. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect" terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any "oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.
13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)
14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist's real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
16. Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative," "enterprise," "optimism," etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone's problems for them, satisfy everyone's needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.
18. Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior).The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual's ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is "inferior" it is not his fault, but society's, because he has not been brought up properly.
19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. Hisfeelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.
20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.
21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists' hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.
22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss.
23. We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. It is only a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism.
My comment: Well, he's right. His other topics are a little whacked, but he nailed this one.
THE U.S. HAS ILLEGALLY BROKEN INTO THE RUSSIAN CONSULATE IN SEATTLE
NOT supposed to do that! It was still flying the Russian flag after the diplomats based there got expelled. This is a serious violation of international law. SEE THIS. (https://www.rt.com/usa/425136-break-seattle-consulate-russian/)
NEXT: They will find "Trumps ties to Russia in a basement file cabinet!
WHITE FARMERS IN SOUTH AFRICA UNDER ATTACK BY BLACKS RIGHT NOW
Twitter is working feverishly to censor all posts about this. #boeverset (https://twitter.com/hashtag/boerverset) is still online but there is widespread talk that all photos of what is going on now are getting wiped off Twitter post haste due to the prevalent anti-white agenda in place practically everywhere now.
I could not find this picture at #boerverset, Every link people are posting that is actually showing what is happening now ends up empty when clicked. Why would the people who own these companies censor this if they did not hate whites, and want whites wiped out? They can lie all they want about being "neutral", actions speak louder than words.
http://www.jimstone.is/pages/whitesa.jpg
As expected, Google is saying zero about the current attacks which can only mean the mister "do no evil" who at least fronted the founding of Google wants this to happen without it being noticed.
http://www.jimstone.is/pages/bashedchild.jpgWhites in South Africa should all go to Australia and let the black community propser on it's own.
Russia's non GMO wheat now accounts for HALF the wheat in the world
This is new to me. I hit This RT report, (https://www.rt.com/business/425050-russian-wheat-export-price-surge/) which states that Russian exports now account for over half of all the wheat sold around the world, and then I thought, Gee, if I remember right, Russia banned GMO's. One quick search of the topic, and Sure enough, they did. (https://theinternationalreporter.org/2016/04/24/russian-organic-wheat-takes-world-by-storm-us-gmo-glyphosate-losing-out/)
So I can happily report that over half the world is not stuck eating Monsanto's synthetic and glyphosate ridden CRAP. Sadly, if you are in America, I can't say that's you.
BURN YOUR U2 CD's!
U2's Bono joined with black south africans in a song about killing whites! Here it is. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qm9nUhTFYfM&ab_channel=EugeneTerreblancheHerinnering)
North Korea nuclear test site collapse
I ignored this, because it has been in the news for six months already. Everyone knew it was coming. And this is probably at least a supplemental reason behind Kim Jong saying he suspended all testing.
No big deal here. All the worries about radioactive releases are bunk. Yes, you might pick something up in China on a 10 digit geiger counter, on the last digit, so you could technically say it was from NK but the amounts of materials used were simply too small to be truly significant, and virtually all of them are now deeply buried.
Kim can find another mountain that already has a tunnel in it and resume. Probably shortly.
The story of Alfie Evans
Alfie Evans is a little British boy who has a brain wasting "disorder" probably caused by tainted vaccines. The family probably does not know vaccines likely caused it, but in relation to what is going on what actually caused it is not very important. The important part of the Alfie Evans story is that it shows how horrible it is when the state gets too powerful. Alfie Evans has been on life support for most of his life, after for unexplained reasons his brain began wasting away at an early age. The british medical system kept him on life support for the past 9 months, and finally decided to pull the plug. In addition to pulling the plug, the doctors got the judge to put out an order disallowing Alfie from being taken anywhere else for treatment.The Vatican became aware of Alfie, and a fundraiser was launched that produced enough to fully fund medical care in Rome. In conjunction with this, Alfie was given citizenship in Italy to help him escape England. But it was not to be -
Rather than allow Alfie to go to Italy for treatment, the doctors took Alfie off life support, saying he'd die in minutes. That did not happen. Alfie continued breathing and stayed alive and is still alive, but has been denied food by the hospital to force him to die from starvation, rather than a need for life support.
RATIONAL CONCLUSION: Alfie was never sick or dying. He was instead an experiment into brain wasting afflictions fronted by three doctors who don't want him taken elsewhere, where their crimes may be discovered. The British government is in on it, because the courts keep ruling that despite the fact he's fully paid and has citizenship elsewhere, he can't go anywhere else for "treatment".
So they are killing him on purpose with methods that would kill any baby, sick or not. That's what tyranny brings people, not only does this speak out against nationalized health care clearly, it proves that in Britain, the state is a tyranny that does whatever the hell it wants with anyone. Obviously they destroyed this kid themselves, and the don't want what they did to be revealed by a legitimate medical team.
The caravans from Mexico
None of them started in Chiapas. There is no practical way to go from the southern border of Mexico to the northern border in less than six months on foot. These are not organic grass roots caravans, they are funded by wealthy people for political purposes. IF there are any real caravans at all. Most likely they organize five miles from the border MAX and consist of people that are paid to do it.
The Unabomber truly understood the leftist mindset!
The Unabomber actually understood leftism well. Perhaps what he did not know was that at the very top, there were people in control who were not following their own mantra, and were using leftism as a weapon of destruction. I did not read his entire manifesto (I do not have time for that, but this section absolutely nails the leftist psy op:
This is surprisingly archived by The New York Times. That's the first accurate thing I have ever seen them do!
FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY
10. By "feelings of inferiority" we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.
11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms "negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world "primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
12. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect" terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any "oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.
13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)
14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist's real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
16. Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative," "enterprise," "optimism," etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone's problems for them, satisfy everyone's needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.
18. Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior).The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual's ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is "inferior" it is not his fault, but society's, because he has not been brought up properly.
19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. Hisfeelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.
20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.
21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists' hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.
22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss.
23. We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. It is only a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism.
My comment: Well, he's right. His other topics are a little whacked, but he nailed this one.
THE U.S. HAS ILLEGALLY BROKEN INTO THE RUSSIAN CONSULATE IN SEATTLE
NOT supposed to do that! It was still flying the Russian flag after the diplomats based there got expelled. This is a serious violation of international law. SEE THIS. (https://www.rt.com/usa/425136-break-seattle-consulate-russian/)
NEXT: They will find "Trumps ties to Russia in a basement file cabinet!
WHITE FARMERS IN SOUTH AFRICA UNDER ATTACK BY BLACKS RIGHT NOW
Twitter is working feverishly to censor all posts about this. #boeverset (https://twitter.com/hashtag/boerverset) is still online but there is widespread talk that all photos of what is going on now are getting wiped off Twitter post haste due to the prevalent anti-white agenda in place practically everywhere now.
I could not find this picture at #boerverset, Every link people are posting that is actually showing what is happening now ends up empty when clicked. Why would the people who own these companies censor this if they did not hate whites, and want whites wiped out? They can lie all they want about being "neutral", actions speak louder than words.
http://www.jimstone.is/pages/whitesa.jpg
As expected, Google is saying zero about the current attacks which can only mean the mister "do no evil" who at least fronted the founding of Google wants this to happen without it being noticed.
http://www.jimstone.is/pages/bashedchild.jpgWhites in South Africa should all go to Australia and let the black community propser on it's own.