Bigjon
31st July 2018, 04:57 PM
http://82.221.129.208/.yi4.html
July 31 2018
NOT A HOAX. "Pedophiles are people too" signs actually happened. (https://katu.com/news/local/pedophiles-are-people-sign-posted-near-school)
The MSM report says whoever did it wanted to stigmatize LGBT. However, with today's current climate, and the obvious push to put pedophelia mainstream, there is reason to doubt that assumption because there were numerous signs just like this posted over a wide area in Oregon.
A hoaxer would be far more likely to print up a few of these and post them in a small area. That's not what happened, this was widespread.http://82.221.129.208/pedophilesarepeople.jpg
Pfizer Vice President: The Gardasil vaccine is deadly
This appeared on Neonnettle. (http://www.neonnettle.com/news/4416-pfizer-vice-president-blows-whistle-the-gardasil-vaccine-is-deadly-) I have edited it down to the key points.
The former vice president of the world's largest pharmaceutical company has blown the whistle to expose the true dangers of mandatory vaccinations. Dr. Peter Rost lifted the lid on vaccines and revealed that the Gardasil inoculation, in particular, is in fact, "deadly".In a shocking expose from one of the highest-ranking whistleblowers to date, Rost has also claimed that Big Pharma is purposely keeping the public unhealthy so they can make a fortune from continual treatments of illnesses rather than curing them. Dr. Rost made the revelations during an interview for the "One More Girl" documentary in which he candidly discussed how the main objective for vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs is to keep the public in a constant state of disease.
Rost also likened mandatory vaccinations to "child abuse" saying; "I would never vaccinate my children." Rost is a former vice president of Pfizer, and a whistleblower of the entire pharmaceutical industry in general. He is the author of "The Whistleblower, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman." Considering his work experience, it would be an understatement to say that he is an insider expert on big pharma marketing.
Rost is not alone in his experience. Here are a couple of quotes from his peers:
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. "
I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine. -
Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime editor-in-chief of the New England Medical Journal
"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue."
"Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness."
- Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet - considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.
In 2005 Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, currently a professor in disease prevention at Stanford University, published the most widely accessed article in the history of the Public Library of Science (PLoS) entitled "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False." In the report he states: "There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false."
We now have a large amount of evidence, and statements from experts that come directly from the field, which paint a very concerning picture.
The science used to educate doctors and develop medicine is flawed.
We are only ever exposed to studies that have been sponsored by big pharmaceutical companies, but these studies are not designed to take the long view. They are not designed to detect problems that can occur years or even decades after a treatment, or examine the risks of taking a drug for long periods of time. Nobody ever seems to mention or acknowledge the many studies which clearly show significant risk associated with many of the products that pharmaceutical companies are manufacturing to help fight disease. This is why independent media is important, especially in a time where more and more people are waking up to what is really happening on our planet.
It is time to examine the research that's being conducted all over the world, from experts (scientists) at various institutions, that is not sponsored by these giant, multinational "health" corporations.
What is even more concerning is the general population's lack of awareness when it comes to these facts. This issue is definitely not going to be addressed in the mainstream news, and despite plenty of evidence to support it, some people will refuse to even look at or acknowledge that it exists.
National Geographic polar bear hoax
A viral youtube video of a starving polar bear got over 2 billion views on Youtube. I did not see this when it happened, but as far as environmentalists go, it pretty much says it all.
The National Geographic falsely stated the bear was dying because of global warming. Many biologists have watched the footage and gave the following reasons for the bear starving to death:
1. Old age.
2. Broken jaw
3. Missing teeth, which prevent it from killing prey
4. A damaged leg.
5. A disease
6. Cancer.
Not one biologist said "climate change" had anything to do with the bear's condition, but the MSM hopped right on it, saying it was an icon of climate change and global warming.
However, recent studies of the bear population in the area have confirmed that they are not reduced or under stress from anything at all, in any way at all.
Polar bears do not live forever. They all die at some point. And what did Youtube and Twitter do to this FAKE CLIMATE CHANGE news? REAL fake news? They blew it to the stratosphere, making sure anyone with a computer saw it.
OVER TWO BILLION VIEWS.
If anyone out there believes the news feeds are not manipulated, and that Twitter and Youtube really want to promote real news, all one has to do is look at the polar bear video and what they did with it. All biologists agree that all this was consisted of the final moments of a polar bear's life, and since none are immortal EVERY LAST POLAR BEAR ON EARTH will provide a similar photo op at some point if a cameraman happens to be there.
YOUTUBE AND TWITTER ABSOLUTELY SUCK. They block real news and boost agenda driven hoaxes to the stratosphere. The polar bear is proof. Ultimately, the fake news award of the decade goes to National Geographic. At one time they were great, but they are now just an agenda driven scam like the rest of the MSM.
Yes, even after being totally busted for the hoax, National Geographic is not admitting to publishing anything wrong. Here is their response to being called out on this. (https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/12/starving-polar-bear-video-climate-change-spd/) ADIOS.
The polar bear story is the kind of crap that should be formally censored. A year later, National Geographic has finally admitted the entire thing was a hoax, only after being busted in a way they can't put to rest.
But the people who fronted the hoax will be paid fatly for the rest of their lives, because they "proved their worth" to the global establishment, which accomplishes practically everything via deception anyway.
Having lied about the polar bear outright will instead be a badge of honor, that will put them in the top spot for favors and career placement from here to eternity.
July 31 2018
NOT A HOAX. "Pedophiles are people too" signs actually happened. (https://katu.com/news/local/pedophiles-are-people-sign-posted-near-school)
The MSM report says whoever did it wanted to stigmatize LGBT. However, with today's current climate, and the obvious push to put pedophelia mainstream, there is reason to doubt that assumption because there were numerous signs just like this posted over a wide area in Oregon.
A hoaxer would be far more likely to print up a few of these and post them in a small area. That's not what happened, this was widespread.http://82.221.129.208/pedophilesarepeople.jpg
Pfizer Vice President: The Gardasil vaccine is deadly
This appeared on Neonnettle. (http://www.neonnettle.com/news/4416-pfizer-vice-president-blows-whistle-the-gardasil-vaccine-is-deadly-) I have edited it down to the key points.
The former vice president of the world's largest pharmaceutical company has blown the whistle to expose the true dangers of mandatory vaccinations. Dr. Peter Rost lifted the lid on vaccines and revealed that the Gardasil inoculation, in particular, is in fact, "deadly".In a shocking expose from one of the highest-ranking whistleblowers to date, Rost has also claimed that Big Pharma is purposely keeping the public unhealthy so they can make a fortune from continual treatments of illnesses rather than curing them. Dr. Rost made the revelations during an interview for the "One More Girl" documentary in which he candidly discussed how the main objective for vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs is to keep the public in a constant state of disease.
Rost also likened mandatory vaccinations to "child abuse" saying; "I would never vaccinate my children." Rost is a former vice president of Pfizer, and a whistleblower of the entire pharmaceutical industry in general. He is the author of "The Whistleblower, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman." Considering his work experience, it would be an understatement to say that he is an insider expert on big pharma marketing.
Rost is not alone in his experience. Here are a couple of quotes from his peers:
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. "
I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine. -
Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime editor-in-chief of the New England Medical Journal
"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue."
"Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness."
- Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet - considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.
In 2005 Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, currently a professor in disease prevention at Stanford University, published the most widely accessed article in the history of the Public Library of Science (PLoS) entitled "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False." In the report he states: "There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false."
We now have a large amount of evidence, and statements from experts that come directly from the field, which paint a very concerning picture.
The science used to educate doctors and develop medicine is flawed.
We are only ever exposed to studies that have been sponsored by big pharmaceutical companies, but these studies are not designed to take the long view. They are not designed to detect problems that can occur years or even decades after a treatment, or examine the risks of taking a drug for long periods of time. Nobody ever seems to mention or acknowledge the many studies which clearly show significant risk associated with many of the products that pharmaceutical companies are manufacturing to help fight disease. This is why independent media is important, especially in a time where more and more people are waking up to what is really happening on our planet.
It is time to examine the research that's being conducted all over the world, from experts (scientists) at various institutions, that is not sponsored by these giant, multinational "health" corporations.
What is even more concerning is the general population's lack of awareness when it comes to these facts. This issue is definitely not going to be addressed in the mainstream news, and despite plenty of evidence to support it, some people will refuse to even look at or acknowledge that it exists.
National Geographic polar bear hoax
A viral youtube video of a starving polar bear got over 2 billion views on Youtube. I did not see this when it happened, but as far as environmentalists go, it pretty much says it all.
The National Geographic falsely stated the bear was dying because of global warming. Many biologists have watched the footage and gave the following reasons for the bear starving to death:
1. Old age.
2. Broken jaw
3. Missing teeth, which prevent it from killing prey
4. A damaged leg.
5. A disease
6. Cancer.
Not one biologist said "climate change" had anything to do with the bear's condition, but the MSM hopped right on it, saying it was an icon of climate change and global warming.
However, recent studies of the bear population in the area have confirmed that they are not reduced or under stress from anything at all, in any way at all.
Polar bears do not live forever. They all die at some point. And what did Youtube and Twitter do to this FAKE CLIMATE CHANGE news? REAL fake news? They blew it to the stratosphere, making sure anyone with a computer saw it.
OVER TWO BILLION VIEWS.
If anyone out there believes the news feeds are not manipulated, and that Twitter and Youtube really want to promote real news, all one has to do is look at the polar bear video and what they did with it. All biologists agree that all this was consisted of the final moments of a polar bear's life, and since none are immortal EVERY LAST POLAR BEAR ON EARTH will provide a similar photo op at some point if a cameraman happens to be there.
YOUTUBE AND TWITTER ABSOLUTELY SUCK. They block real news and boost agenda driven hoaxes to the stratosphere. The polar bear is proof. Ultimately, the fake news award of the decade goes to National Geographic. At one time they were great, but they are now just an agenda driven scam like the rest of the MSM.
Yes, even after being totally busted for the hoax, National Geographic is not admitting to publishing anything wrong. Here is their response to being called out on this. (https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/12/starving-polar-bear-video-climate-change-spd/) ADIOS.
The polar bear story is the kind of crap that should be formally censored. A year later, National Geographic has finally admitted the entire thing was a hoax, only after being busted in a way they can't put to rest.
But the people who fronted the hoax will be paid fatly for the rest of their lives, because they "proved their worth" to the global establishment, which accomplishes practically everything via deception anyway.
Having lied about the polar bear outright will instead be a badge of honor, that will put them in the top spot for favors and career placement from here to eternity.