PDA

View Full Version : Betsy DeVos’s Sexual-Assault Rules Would Let the Accused Cross-Examine Accusers



End Times
18th November 2018, 08:03 AM
Nope, not an Onion headline...the #BELIEVEWOMEN Bolshevists are against due process...if you didn't get that from the Kavanaugh hearings...


https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/11/betsy-devos-campus-sexual-assault/576100/


On Friday, the Education Department released its heavily anticipated proposal that would revamp the way colleges deal with accusations of sexual misconduct on campus. Many of the details in the proposed regulation did not come as a surprise. Still, one feature of the rules in particular stood out: Colleges will be required to allow students accused of sexual assault to cross-examine their accuser at a live hearing.

“We can, and must, condemn sexual violence and punish those who perpetrate it, while ensuring a fair grievance process,” Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said in a press release on the new rules. “Those are not mutually exclusive ideas. They are the very essence of how Americans understand justice to function.” But several higher-education attorneys told me that instead of setting clear policies for institutions to follow, the new regulations may push institutions toward less formal methods of resolving sexual-misconduct complaints that can result in less harsh of a penalty for wrongdoing.

(...)

Victims’ advocates have long argued that cross-examination could dissuade those who have been assaulted from reporting what happened to them. Meanwhile, due-process advocates have argued that cross-examination in a live hearing is important to suss out any discrepancies in testimonies. And in favoring that method, the new rules would ban colleges from having a single investigator—usually a lawyer or an administrator—gather facts and issue findings.

BrewTech
18th November 2018, 08:29 AM
Victims’ advocates have long argued that cross-examination could dissuade those who have been assaulted from reporting what happened to them. Why? It seems to me this sentence would be more truthful, and make more logical sense:


Victims’ advocates have long argued that cross-examination could dissuade those who claim to have been assaulted from lying about what happened to them. Truth doesn't need special protections.



First it's "well, we're only eliminating due process for sexual assault cases, because SEXUAL ASSAULT"...

*Now we just redefine "sexual assault" to include everything under the sun* ;)

Yer Honor - he looked at me with rape in his eyes!

Son, yer going down!

End Times
18th November 2018, 06:08 PM
Jewdicial Bolshevism.

The process of moving from innocent until proven guilty to guilty until proven innocent to guilty until adjewdicated guilty.

Neuro
18th November 2018, 09:22 PM
the new rules would ban colleges from having a single investigator—usually a lawyer or an administrator—gather facts and issue findings.

That is exactly how the judicial system functioned in Soviet Union. You had one prosecutor appointed by the state that supposedly was impartial. Of course they were never impartial in cases involving the state, which were many because it was the only owner of property, probably the defendants and victims status in the communist hierarchy had an impact as well. Made process short though!

Jewboo
18th November 2018, 09:25 PM
Many if not most complaints were "Anonymous" to protect the alleged victim.

Cebu_4_2
19th November 2018, 04:01 PM
Many if not most complaints were "Anonymous" to protect the alleged victim.

If they were not baseless complaints there is no need to remain anonymous.