Jon Rappoport-Dr Anthony Fauci is now the President of the United States

Dr Anthony Fauci is now the President of the United States

by Jon Rappoport

March 23, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

—Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and infectious Diseases—

HEADLINE: “In Dr. Fauci we Trust.” (Daily Beast)


The Daily Beast writes about Fauci: “…as he guides the nation through the coronavirus crisis…stands at the White House with President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence…introduce[s] actual truth to the coronavirus briefings…Fauci has been in charge from the start.”


The ECONOMIC DEVASTATION now consciously set in place, in the US, as a result of lockdowns, will last…how long?


If Fauci and his cohorts at the CDC and the World Health Organization say two months, the devastation will be two months. If they say six months, it will be six months. If they say a year, it will be a year.


Fauci is the medical front man. He announces how long “the epidemic” will persist. That, in turn, equals how long the lockdowns will persist, which in turn equals how long the smashing of the economy will go on.


As president, Fauci trumps Trump. Trump has been put in a box, checked and double checked.


As I’ve been establishing in many articles (full archive here), the epidemic itself is a misnomer: the dubious discovery of a new virulent virus; worthless, deceptive, useless diagnostic tests for the coronavirus, rendering case numbers meaningless; people suffering from a variety of traditional disease conditions and several new non-viral conditions, all re-labeled under the empty umbrella term, “COVID-19”; the media pumping of fear; medical/public health authorities put in charge of national policy; escalating mass surveillance and social distancing; AND THEREFORE BOTH THE BEGINNING OF THE “EPIDEMIC” AND ITS END ARE MANDATED BY ARBITRARY EDICT.


Not science. Not fact.


In an expanding number of countries, we are looking at medical coup. Palace revolution.


Media are blaring “coronavirus coverage” wall to wall and repressing the full picture of the economic war against the people, and its human cost.


Workers living from paycheck to paycheck, laid off. Rents not paid. Businesses close. Owners go broke. Small investors lose their shirts. Savings dwindle. Public venues shut down.


Picture this. In a small city, the university suspends classes. The majority of students go home. Overnight, all the money students would spend locally drains away. A week later, an order comes through: restaurants and bars must close. Workers are laid off. The owners, who were operating on small margins, are squeezed to the hilt and beyond. There is a major tourist attraction in town, a theme park. It shuts down. Tourist trade, which was already drying up, goes flat. A whole variety of shops shut their doors. Then, an order: non-essential stores must stop doing business, unless they can somehow limit traffic to ten customers at a time. A huge botanical garden and two museums close. Their employees are without jobs. And all this is just the beginning of the damage…the citizens themselves hunker down. They start abandoning their homes and moving in with friends and family—more people in smaller spaces…yet they try to practice social distancing. Hospitals in town are dealing with more and more people, who come in with coughs, sniffles, ordinary flu, long-term lung conditions and the belief they could be infected by the virus. Doctors are under the gun. They’re forced to diagnose some of these people as “presumptive COVID cases.” That means general wards will not do—because of “the contagion factor,” such patients must be shunted into ICU. But there are not enough beds…


Medical edicts run the whole country.


“This is not politics. This is science and concern and containment and healing.”


No. This is a coup.


This is an economic war.


An attack on freedom.


The front man, the president of the United States, is Anthony Fauci.


And in other countries? Read this, from Haaretz, in Israel:


“Israel’s PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES CHIEF (my caps) told an emergency meeting of lawmakers on an intelligence panel earlier this week that the key to eradicating the coronavirus pandemic relies on the enforcement of strict isolation measures, and the timing of introducing that policy.”


“In her remarks to the Knesset Subcommittee on Intelligence and Secret Services on Monday, concerning the Shin Bet security service’s monitoring of coronavirus patients, Sigal Sadetsky referenced the Chinese handling of COVID-19. She told the panel’s chairman, MK Gabi Ashkenazi (Kahol Lavan), that it all depends on ‘when you start it and how strongly you do it,’ and that she believes ‘everyone will do the same thing’.”


“When MK Yoav Kish (Likud) sought to clarify whether she meant a total lockdown or curfew, Sadetsky replied: ‘A lockdown and personal monitoring of people, AND A TOTAL HALT TO PERSONAL FREEDOMS’.”

I was thinking they managed to get Trump boxed in somehow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnight rambler

I was thinking they managed to get Trump boxed in somehow.

---

I think they used that "foot in the door" sales technique, where you get someone to agree to something small, ("hey, Donald, its just 15 days") and then you switch in on them (psychopath Pence with the covid response team, saying 18 months--so immediately contradicting what they told Trump). I think this is called foot in the door, maybe also same as bait and switch.

This years flu season has become a host for an outbreak of NeoCon virus with spliced on socialism

From the Krisanne Hall article I posted in another thread:
https://krisannehall.com/index.php/r...nvisible-enemy

Quote:

---

Our State Constitutions and the Constitution of these United States were established as written standards to protect the individual from the will of the majority, to secure the rights of the minority. Ironically the needs of the many argument used today to justify a cry for national curfews, business closure, and forced quarantine, justified by the needs of the many, is the same argument used throughout history to justify slavery and the involuntary and indefinite incarceration of innocent people, even in America’s history. If residents wish to voluntarily follow guidelines and act responsibly, then so be it. But when business owners, Pastors of churches, and Sheriffs’ defending rights, refuse to obey any of these unconstitutional mandates, they are not acting lawlessly because it is actually those in government who are violating the Supreme Law of the land. These individuals are enforcing the law in the face of lawless government.

---

Quote:

---

What we do, what we allow those in government to do over the next few weeks, will determine the future fate of people in America and around the world. We cannot give into the “invisible enemy” and their siren song of the “necessity” which sets a precedent for our inherent rights to be brushed aside so easily. William Pitt The Younger gives this wisdom to our generation:

---

Also Officials who deprive one of their rights under color of law are not acting as government, but as criminals 18USC §§ 241 & 242

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

Also Officials who deprive one of their rights under color of law are not acting as government, but as criminals 18USC §§ 241 & 242

---

If I am reading this right, it refers only to reasons involving race, color or alien.

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by woodman

If I am reading this right, it refers only to reasons involving race, color or alien.

---

“Officials who under color of law deprive any person of their rights are no longer acting as government, but as criminals, 18 USC §§241 &242” Dr. Edwin M. Vieira Constitutional Attorney, Author & Lecturer

Maybe, ~ Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, [ ] shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

“Officials who under color of law deprive any person of their rights are no longer acting as government, but as criminals, 18 USC §§241 &242” Dr. Edwin M. Vieira Constitutional Attorney, Author & Lecturer
[/FONT][/COLOR]
Maybe, ~ Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, [ ] shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;

---

It is a tough call. I am not sure how to interpret. Of course, I have no legal training. Makes you wonder why the words were put in that way. It certainly should refer to any person, the addition of the qualifiers seems totally unneccessary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

“Officials who under color of law deprive any person of their rights are no longer acting as government, but as criminals, 18 USC §§241 &242” Dr. Edwin M. Vieira Constitutional Attorney, Author & Lecturer
[/FONT][/COLOR]
Maybe, ~ Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, [ ] shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;

---

I haven't looked, but I'm pretty sure there's no CFR to go with that.

Quote:

---

It certainly should refer to any person

---

A person is a creation of the state. Person comes from persona, and persona is a(n actor's) mask.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by woodman

It is a tough call. I am not sure how to interpret. Of course, I have no legal training. Makes you wonder why the words were put in that way. It certainly should refer to any person, the addition of the qualifiers seems totally unneccessary.

---

I have no legal training either. If it weren’t for Dr. Vieira’s statement I would read it the same as you, applying to aliens and colored and race. Aren’t we caucasians a “race”. The qualifiers make me think it is part of the civil rights act.