Fractional Law Making and Moral Debt

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URwNVfJGsGs

http://www.seewithyourmind.org/index...and-moral-debt

Quote:

---

Fractional Law Making Politician's over expand the Law supply through a fractional law making system.This inflation in the law supply leads to a devalue in the law. When law's are fractionally expanded they become more and more immoral and unjust. When citizen's are forced to live surrounded by degenerate law's their moral's become devalued as a result.

These fractional law's are a paper illusion.

Fractional Law Making creates a Moral Debt in society.

---

Tag

Very thought provoking correlation.

the exponentially growing number of laws guarantees that we're all guilty of something.

yet there is serious diminishing returns from the extra laws. they do little to benefit the general public.

the other factor is that "politically connected" citizens and other groups that routinely receive "get out of jail free" cards, are allowed to commit the same crimes that are made illegal for the general public, but with impunity.


this system of selective enforcement of a massive legal code, that itself has diminishing returns = US gov., with the frequent support of state & local governments.

the net result - citizens who are often good people raised with a strong moral code see that it doesn't apply, and give up.


for example, why shouldn't i shoplift at Safeway if they sell me a cell-phone that doesn't work, and refuse to give me my money back ?

The net producers are the fractional reserve and the net consumers are the credit derivatives that are supported by them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hypertiger

The net producers are the fractional reserve and the net consumers are the credit derivatives that are supported by them.

---

Could it not be said both are complicit and compromised. That each knowing or unknowingly acts illegally in their own capacity?

It is my understanding our lies are never settled. (Past+Present=Future)
Hence, the facacta and the shmata. LOL

I thought they had a hard enough time of passing a buck...

http://ipwebdev.com/campaign/cg6.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Santa

Very thought provoking correlation.

---

Thank you.

It truly is amazing how they have corrupted the Law, just like the money. When i first had this epiphany, I was blown away by how many similarities there are between the two. The over printing of Law's, the devalue of the Law's through inflation, and the moral debt that is accrued by these immoral and unjust Law's.

Just like i laid out in the video, when we left Common Law and the Gold standard, we literally left reality.

Good food for thought. Here are some of mine.

FRN's work really well in the unit of account and medium of exchange functions of money. They only fail in the store of value function. Fiat will never disappear and digital is here to stay as long as we have computers and electricity. So, FRN's are really only one third defective as money. An honest money system would just need to address the store of value deficiency and fiat is good to go! Hard money is dead and will never return. Not with 7 billion people on the planet who want convenience. Just figure out store of value in a world of fiat. Some have, you know.

Common Law works really well in a simpler time. But, are drunk driving laws bad? You can drive around drunk and never hurt anyone, so some might argue, why give tickets and criminalize drunk drivers if there are no victims? Others would argue that some victimless actions are worthy of being crimes. Where the line is drawn is the question. So let's say everyone agrees that criminalizing drunk driving is a good idea even though there is no victim. We agree because drunk driving will eventually lead to victims and it is better to prevent those as drunk driving has no real value for society.

Then some will try and apply that same standard to gun ownership by citizens but will only see the potential victims of gun ownership by citizens and not see the potential victims of a defenseless society against an armed government. And this is where it gets a bit more tricky. Weighing the costs and benefits that are more difficult to judge.

Debt jubilees have their place. We need a law jubilee. Start out again with common law and add judiciously.

Culpa est immiscere se rei ad se non pertinenti. It is a fault to meddle with what does not belong to or does not concern you.