Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
Militia Intelligence Report: Jim Condit Jr. – Election Fraud & The Jewish Shadow Government (10-10-16)
Author and election fraud whistleblower Jim Condit Jr. will join chris on The Militia Intelligence Report. The two cover 100% rigged elections and controversial topics; International Banking, Adolf Hitler and much more. Calls taken in the second hour! Music list
With 43 comments http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/...ment-10-10-16/
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
Reports of Potential Voting Trickery in 2016 Presidential Election
October 26, 2016 MHB Administrator 6 Comments
Dallas elections officials say allegations “likely false or instances of user error”
Over the past few weeks corporate news media have interpreted Donald Trump’s repeated claims of a “rigged” election as exaggerated. The Republican presidential candidate’s response in the third presidential debate of perhaps not accepting the election result was met with similar bluster by the major punditocracy.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=Rb592tRwcYY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb592tRwcYY
The experience of voters in Texas and other states may be bearing out Trump’s warning as multiple reports are surfacing of electronic voting machines changing virtual ballots from Republican to Democratic presidential candidates. Because Texas law prohibits videos and photos in polling places many voters in that state explain the apparent polling shenanigans on social media.
As The Economic Collapse Blog observes,
[A] number of voters in Texas are reporting that the voting machines switched their votes from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton. The odd thing is that none of the other choices were affected when these individuals attempted to vote for a straight Republican ticket. If Hillary Clinton is declared the winner of the state of Texas on election night, a full investigation of these voting machines should be conducted, because there is no way that Donald Trump should lose that state. I have said that it will be the greatest miracle in U.S. political history if Donald Trump wins this election, but without the state of Texas Donald Trump has exactly zero chance of winning. So those living down in Texas need to keep reporting anything unusual that they see or hear when they go to vote.
Here are several social media posts from the Dallas Morning News article at the I Am A Texan blog.
Continue reading Reports of Potential Voting Trickery in 2016 Presidential Election → https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/10/2...tial-election/
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
From bev harris; short & longer versions about the (((GEMS vote counting software))).
9m:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpq...ature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM
25m:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AG...ature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44
Quote:
Fraction Magic - Detail Version
Bev Harris 100,545 views
Subscribe
785
1K
20
Published on Oct 31, 2016
A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found, with context and explanation. Demonstration uses a real voting system and real vote databases and takes place in seconds across multiple jurisdictions. Over 5000 subcontractors and middlemen have the access to perform this for any or all clients. It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses. All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors. It's a product. It's scaleable. It learns its environment and can adjust to any political environment, any demographic. It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing.
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Militia Intelligence Report: Jim Condit Jr. – Election Fraud & The Jewish Shadow Government (10-10-16)
Author and election fraud whistleblower Jim Condit Jr. will join chris on The Militia Intelligence Report. The two cover 100% rigged elections and controversial topics; International Banking, Adolf Hitler and much more. Calls taken in the second hour! Music list
With 43 comments
http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/...ment-10-10-16/
Another Condit visit with host Chris Dorsey-- a fairly new renegade host who i've never warmed up to; too knowitall/dogmatic, abrasive, & boastful about how harassed & poisecuted he's been by the jesuits lol :D IOW, extra high odds of being an agitprop/dis-direction spook himself. :rolleyes:
Militia Intelligence Report: Jim Condit Jr – Vote Fixing, Catholicism & Hitler (10-31-16)
Jim Condit Jr is back by popular demad to the MIR. chris and Jim take calls on Catholicism and Christianity in general, Hitler, the international Jewish Military Media Banking Complex and The Fixing of elections.
http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/...tler-10-31-16/
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
25:19 mins
Biggest Election Fraud In History Discovered In The United States: Breaking Now
The Alex Jones Channel
188,627 views
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GFxKJ7RJ1jE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFxKJ7RJ1jE
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
Trying to reconcile DT'S official 47.5/47.7% win, with my overall paradigm which asssumes the spooks, as servants of (((TPTB))), have total control over "election results".
After the JSM spent months pimping utterly fake polls giving killery the lead to prep the public for the fake results, now with DTs win by 0.2% of the popular vote, they're babbling on about DTs "stunning upset", and wondering aloud what could have gone so wrong with their polls?
When in reality it was obvious all along that DT led by somewhere in the double digits, and I expect the same was true in the REAL pop vote numbers from last night... IE we're looking at fraudulent vote numbers making it appear as some kind of photo finish when it was actually a DT landslide.
I speculate something changed in the recent month behind the scenes in killery's preordained installation as potus. Deals were made-- guessing something about DTs forgetting about his killery prosecution, & his installing a cabal of dinjooz for his cabinet & key appointments, in exchange for allowing him to become prez.
Point was not blowing up the whole poker game-- the secret societies, pedo rings, satanism, JWO, etc.
Plus with neocon pence as veep, they can always just whack DT & have their boy be prez.
Any thoughts?
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
Guest Posts
Trump’s Victory Should Not Obfuscate Election Fraud
November 9, 2016 MHB Administrator 9 Comments
[Democratic Party operatives clearly believed they could steal the 2016 Presidential Election for Hillary Clinton, just as they had done for her in the Democratic Primary. This is suggested, for example, in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s November 8 remarks on PBS’s NewsHour, where she exhibited strong confidence in a Clinton victory. This no doubt is the type of hubris that drove much of the electorate to vote against the incumbent party. Further, Dems chose an embodiment of establishment incompetence, insincerity and corruption who remarkably failed to even inspire her own purported base to turn out the vote, CNN observes. Still, as this brief article below suggests, the public will likely never know the Republican candidate’s true margin of victory, -Ed.]
Doug Steil
Aletho News
As luck would have it Hillary Clinton’s landslide loss was so big that massive election fraud by Democratic Party operatives in various cities could not overcome her deficit.
The “shock” by insiders of having lost obviously reflects their earlier certainty of prevailing, which hints at the extent of their vote rigging schemes. The unverifiable system of voting in America is so flawed that foreign observers are now being blocked from monitoring US elections. The topic of fraud can no longer be swept under the rug.
Surely Clinton and the media will try to make a big deal of having “received more votes” than Trump in the popular vote total, which according to the current tabulation has already occurred, with an even higher differential to come once West Coast state results are all counted.
Those inside the DC Beltway and within elite campuses will claim that this is “unfair” and that Hillary really “should have won”.
However, this assertion should be vociferously challenged. Surely this surplus is artificial. Is it really possible that so many Americans would have ignored the prospect of going to war with Russia?
The question needs to be raised publicly: How many hundreds of thousand votes were switched from Trump to Clinton altogether and how many invalid (illegal) votes were registered for her?
Aside from that — assuming all the votes were legitimate — the electoral college system is intended to prevent, say, a concentration of votes in urban centers to the detriment of rural voters across the country. As is the case in Maine and Nebraska, voters in individual states can decide how to allocate their electoral votes, so it doesn’t have to be a winner-take-all system.
It is a tribute to the designers of the US Constitution that the Electoral College mechanism still exists. It’s almost as if though they might also have already suspected long ago that there could be illicit efforts in the future to change an election outcome simply by stuffing the ballots in a few locations. The indirect US electoral system has saved the country from a big crisis brought on by election fraud. Instead of changing the Constitution future election reforms should focus on making vote fraud impossible or extremely difficult to carry out.
With growing reader comments,
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/0...lection-fraud/
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
I commented at memoryholeblog.com
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/0...comment-119547
maxgail
November 10, 2016 at 2:30 PM
I’m all for the overall vote fraud issue of this article; but where it (and a couple reader comments) go off track IMHO, is pinning the mainly electronic voter fraud on “Clintons/the DemRats”.
AFAIC the whole fake “election” system introduced with 2001’s mockingly named “Help America Vote Act” (HAVA) was a product of the alphabet spook agencies, in service to their real bosses: the NWO banksters. TPTB/NWO obviously have a problem with a fullly honest/transparent/auditable election process, given that their global tyranny agenda isn’t in the lower 99.x percent’s best interests.
I was active in the “verifiable voting” movement circa ’04 when the blackbox/fake “election” nightmare was coming into focus. I recall the question of why the software running these blackboxes was allowed to be closed-source/secret/proprietary rather than open-source & inspectable by anyone? The official answer as smugly disseminated by the NWO-propaganda-MSM was how the blackbox supplying corp’s (then Diebold & others) had a legitimate need to protect their investments in the software they developed, and the NWO media dismissed any further questions/discussion of it. Imagine, software tasked with a simple 1+1=2 job which any beginner programmer could write; software depended on at the core of our (pretend) democracy, yet allowed to be ‘secret’. I also recall a bill in Congress to prohibit all wireless tech capabilities in the blackboxes, which was quietly, bipartisanly dismissed.
The above only makes sense when accepting that the current HAVA pretend-“election” process is fully, ‘invisibly’ corrupt/manipulable from its inception BY DESIGN by TPTB/NWO. I recall watching the propaganda-MSM’s post ’04 “election” coverage, where WRT voter’s impressions of the new HAVA blackboxes, they paraded out exiting voter after voter who gushed about how they loved it; so simple & easy, oh such an improvement!! No dissenting opinions to be heard.
Point is, the HAVA pretend voting system is a product of, and under the full control of the NWO banksters through their spook agency proxies, aided by their propaganda-MSM in pretending it’s all so legit… not “the clintons/DemRats.”
Reply
maxgail
November 10, 2016 at 4:13 PM
I’ll add, given my belief above re our HAVA/fake “election outcomes” being under full NWO bankster control– following is what I believe happened wrt Trump’s recent “upset victory” (as the MSM has labored to discharacterize it…). I read this 2-part blog which makes the case for DT’s being a de facto mossad controlled sexual deviate/pedo:
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/...led-by-mossad/
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/...ossad-part-ii/
Some of the reader comments there, dated ~1 week before the 11/8 fake “election”, speculate that the NWO may have switched horses from HRC to DT; but with a ‘photo-finish’ pretend vote outcome, perhaps with the popular vote vs electoral college disparity which we’ve since seen the official fake election outcome reflect– no ‘mandate’ for DT. I’d personally guess DT’s real lead over HRC, both through the couple months preceding 11/8, and in the TRUE 11/8 vote outcome, was in the double digits somewhere… in spite of the NWO-Propaganda-MSM’s incessant pre-election pushing of fake latest poll numbers indicating HRC leading… psyop’ing the electorate in preparation for her seemingly inevitable installment as POTUS. You’ve all seen Newsweek’s now infamous “Madame President” edition, on sale before the fake election, yes?!
Well it did appear the NWO/backroom machinations were furiously in play in the 1-2 weeks prior to 11/8… Comey’s re-opening then re-closing of FBI’s HRC investigation; the ongoing Wikileaks disclosures including some tips of TPTB’s ritual satanic abuse/pedo iceberg, team-HRC’s purchasing a NYC fireworks show 1-2 weeks before the fake election then cancelling it the day before, etc. This all after months of blatant MSM pro-HRC anti-Trump psyop’ing of the public. So it does appear to me that TPTB/NWO did in fact switch horses around the last minute; and their MSM was/is still in disarray as to how they should spin things come 11/8.
The Soros/MoveOn orchestrated “protests” last night are a whole ‘nother tar baby to discuss! I did notice how, at least CNN, went wall to wall on that synthetic “story” for a few hours last night… that’s always a psyop ‘tell’…
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
Tuesday proves one of two things:
1) the elections are not fake;
2) Trump is fake.
Re: FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
I can't easily copy over formatting, embedded links nor pics from this 'device' so reco reading this at the source; plus there's growing reader comments there.
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/1...rt-of-the-deal
Just posting this here for a bit of internet redundancy; as i'd noticed MHB blog was offline this past Monday.
Guest Posts
President Donald Trump: The Art of the Deal
November 10, 2016 MHB Administrator 10 Comments
By Vivian Lee
I don’t do it for the money. I’ve got enough, much more than I’ll ever need. I do it to do it. Deals are my art form. Other people paint beautifully on canvas or write wonderful poetry. I like making deals, preferably big deals. That’s how I get my kicks.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
The stunning win by Donald J. Trump in the November 8th U.S. presidential election took many by surprise, since Hillary Clinton was the chosen candidate. Everyone seemed to think that Clinton would win – either legitimately or in a rigged election. News coverage favored Clinton by a wide margin, and the only major network to give Trump a break was Fox News.[1] Most polls predicted that Clinton would win the presidency, with her odds of winning put as high as 85% and Trump’s as low as 35%.[2] The pundits are now asking how they all got it wrong.[3]
trump-art-of-the-deal
Donald Trump with his book, The Art of the Deal. Image: The Guardian.
Blame is being placed on “the e-mail scandal,” with James Comey’s letter of October 28 to the U.S. Congress refocusing attention on Clinton’s private e-mails just 11 days before the election.[4] FBI Director Comey reopened the investigation after another 650,000 e-mails were found, this time on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin. The laptop was confiscated by the New York Police Department (NYPD) and turned over to the FBI. On November 6, Comey caved to pressure, announcing that no charges were warranted, but some said the damage had been done.[5]
Election night was a long, drawn-out affair, with final results not in until 2:40 am on Wednesday. The television networks “called” the electoral vote in the states, a notoriously undemocratic way of deciding U.S. elections before all the votes have actually been counted. Fox News ran consistently high vote counts for Trump, as opposed to the lower numbers predicted at CNN. Dramatic coverage continued into the wee hours, with a number of states said to be “too close to call” – including Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Arizona, all of which eventually went to Trump, who won by a landslide.[6]
megyn-kelly-screenshot-11-8-16Megyn Kelly going to find out why Fox can’t call any more states for Trump. Image Fox News.
Although many states were “called” earlier in the evening based on partial results and exit polls, the last few states were agonized over by the networks, with Fox anchor Megyn Kelly walking back to the desk of experts twice to ask them why they could not call these key states – and when they might be able to do so. According to Kelly, she thought Fox would be able to call the election around 11 pm. She said she expected Clinton to win, until there was an abrupt shift, when “the real vote” started to come in. She ascribed the dramatic turnaround to
“a hidden Trump vote…It was a resounding victory. I have never seen anything like this. You will never have a result this shocking where people got it shockingly this wrong.”[7]
A return to Anthony Weiner’s laptop may provide an explanation.
weiner-washington-times
Anthony Weiner. Image Washington Times.
Unnamed but highly-placed sources, including NYPD detectives and prosecutors, revealed that the laptop contained “enough evidence to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life.” Also reportedly involved were Huma Abedin, Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein – convicted pedophile, as well as members of the U.S. Congress, the Saudis, and other interests in the Middle East. Epstein and his “Lolita Express” have been associated with numerous well-known people, such as Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and Bill Clinton.[8] The NYPD reportedly said that if the FBI and Department of Justice did not issue indictments against “Clinton and co-conspirators,” they would go public with the e-mails. According to an NYPD chief:
What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach…There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to WikiLeaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that…People are going to prison.[9]
This being the case, what better way to stanch the blood than to give Trump the presidency?
Although Comey let Clinton off the hook, it seems clear that forces within the government had decided she was a liability. Should she be elected, the emails would come out, and she would be indicted along with many others. And Trump had vowed to investigate “crooked Hillary” with chants from supporters to “lock her up.”[10] Inconveniently, as it now turned out, the election had been fixed in favor of Clinton.[11] Clearly it was time to make a deal with Trump.
trump-1985-la-times
Donald Trump in 1985, shortly before the publication of The Art of the Deal. Image Los Angeles Times.
The best thing you can do is deal from strength, and leverage is the biggest strength you can have. Leverage is having something the other guy wants. Or better yet, needs. Or best of all, simply can’t do without.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
Let’s say that Trump was approached by government insiders and told he could be president – if he agreed to certain terms. Let’s say that the deal was this: Trump gets a win on November 8th and becomes the nation’s 45th president; he lets all allegations against Clinton and her foundation drop; he respects Obama’s “legacy”; and he agrees to partner with Israel.[12] This deal was struck after Comey’s letter of October 28. Clinton was given notice as Election Day approached (although she may have held out hope that she could win). And the news teams were informed during the course of the election.
When the counter-fix went live, the networks experienced the turnaround – the “hidden Trump vote” referred to by Megyn Kelly. Around 10 or 11 pm, the anchors began to refer to Trump as the winner, frequently correcting themselves or qualifying their statements: “I mean, IF he wins,” or “that is, presuming he is elected.” This included Anderson Cooper and his cronies at CNN, who suddenly turned conciliatory toward Trump after months of abuse and slander. The consolation prize went to Clinton: winning the popular vote. Even this was predicted by the networks, with no surprise or consternation.
It’s strange how things can turn around.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
Was this the deal of a lifetime? Or did Trump really win the election?
Vivian Lee is the nom de plume of a tenured professor at an east coast university.
Notes:
[1] “Open Season on Donald Trump: Corporate Press Propaganda at Behest of Clinton Campaign.” https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/10/2...nton-campaign/
[2] “Why Did Many Polls Seem To Miss a Trump Victory?” CBS News, 11/9/16. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-did-...trump-victory/.
[3] “News Outlets Wonder Where the Predictions Went Wrong.” New York Times, 11/9/16. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/bu...ent-wrong.html
[4] “FBI Investigating New Emails for Classified Information.” New York Times, 10/28/16. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016...ton-email.html. “Oct. 28 FBI Letter to Congressional Leaders on Clinton Email Investigation.” Washington Post, 10/28/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/...tigation/2113/
[5] “FBI Chief: No Charges for Clinton after New Emails Reviewed.” New York Times, 11/6/16. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016...on-emails.html. “Read the Full Text of James Comey’s Letter on the New Clinton Emails.” USA Today, 11/6/16. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...ails/93398304/
[6] “Donald Trump Wins the Presidency in Stunning Upset over Clinton.” Washington Post, 11/9/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...6d4_story.html. “Presidential Election Results: Donald J. Trump Wins.” New York Times, 11/9/16. http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president. “Key President Election Results by State.” http://www.politico.com/2016-electio.../map/president
[7] “Megyn Kelly Admits She Was Expecting Different Election Result.” Western Journalism, 11/9/16. http://www.westernjournalism.com/meg...ection-result/
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein. “Alan Dershowitz on the Defense (His Own).” New York Times, 12/12/15. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/bu...e-his-own.html. “Prince Andrew Faces Court Appearance in ‘Sex Slave’ Case against Jeffrey Epstein.” Mirror, 9/22/15. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...arance-6495024. “Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender’s Jet Much More than Previously Known.” Foxnews.com, 5/13/16. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13...sly-known.html
[9] “Breaking Bombshell: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury.” Infowars, 11/3/16. http://www.infowars.com/breaking-bom...-play-perjury/
[10] “At Florida Rally, Trump Resumes Attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton.’” Washington Post, 9/27/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...llary-clinton/
[11] “Predetermined Vote Counts Show Nov. 8 Presidential Election Is Rigged in Favor of Hillary Clinton.” https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/201...llary-clinton/ “Trump’s Victory Should Not Obfuscate Election Fraud.” https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/0...lection-fraud/
[12] “Biden: Trump Administration Will Stand with Israel.” cnn.com, 11-9-16. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politi...ael/index.html