High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11 High

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serpo

I dont mind sounding crazy as I dont get too attached to ideas one way or an other ,but I do respect the TRUTH a great deal and the Admiral in this OP found out he was being lied too for 50 years or more.

I dont care about your opinion Joboo but I care about the Admrals opinion and you seem to want to ram your opinion down everyones throat which is an example of a hidden agenda

---

That's your opinion. I'm speaking to the evidence that was found. One reality is likely, and all the evidence supports it, while the other is far fetched at best.

The video you posted stated the guy had rock solid evidence of a missile as the premise, and turned out to be everything but. Again I am speaking to this particular aspect of the 9II narrative. I have no argument with the rest of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

Could be a dummy test to determine any number of future "bunker busting" technologies (soon to be required).

Speaking of dummy tests...

---

So when did all the airplane wreckage get there without any witnesses noticing that yet they all noticed the airplane flying in and impacting?

All these guys running around tossing stuff all over the place, running in and out of a burning building to set up photo ops, and nobody noticed?

I'm not seeing it. It's far more likely they had planes set out to do this, and they used them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

So when did all the airplane wreckage get there without any witnesses noticing that yet they all noticed the airplane flying in and impacting?

---

You realize you're talking about the Pentagon?

There are no witnesses.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...witnesses.html

Funny they had air defense turned off that day

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

You realize you're talking about the Pentagon?

There are no witnesses.

---

Except for a highway being right there.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-cont...blog_997_1.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EE_

http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-cont...blog_997_1.jpg

---

.....

only to add other hither to forever unknown & vested interests.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-cont.../06/119750.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

Could be a dummy test to determine any number of future "bunker busting" technologies (soon to be required).

Speaking of dummy tests...

---

A bunker buster is used to penetrate first then explode. If it exploded, then you're not going to find a hole like that, and if it didn't explode what caused the explosion, and fire? A dud bunker buster + planted explosives? Ok this is new territory indeed.

Yeah...we'll chuck a dud bunker buster in there, then dispose of it, then set off explosives, and start scattering plane wreckage all over the place.

"Harry break out crane to get those engines unloaded, and get that landing gear in there, careful of the flames....don't mind all the traffic stopped right there on the highway....they won't look......ok frank move the crane into position...we need to get the second engine into that burning mess..."

How much more contrived does it need to be to avoid what the evidence is showing?

http://www.kasjo.net/ats/image004.jpg

Yes, quite.