-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif
Pickled remains of Auschwitz victim whose wife and children were gassed before he was dismembered by sadistic Nazi doctor are finally laid to rest 72 years later
- WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT
- Polish Jew Menachem Taffel was one of demon Dr August Hirt's 86 victims
- They were brought from Auschwitz in Poland to Natzweiler-Struthof, France
- Bodies were pickled in alcohol but 72 years later they have been buried
By Allan Hall In Berlin for MailOnline
Published: 07:39 GMT, 8 September 2015 | Updated: 15:26 GMT, 8 September 2015
^^ Daily Fail's made-up HoloHoax nightmare story of the week, lol :D
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
@ Carolyn Yeager's:
Fred Leuchter talks to Jim Rizoli about his experiences with governments and the law
Published by carolyn on Wed, 2015-09-30 21:03
"The Rest of the Story"
Jim Rizoli got engineer Fred Leuchter, now 72, to talk about his life while Joe Rizoli filmed it. The result is a great video, both enlightening and entertaining. Fred is a good story teller and covers the various persecutions he's endured with good humor and interesting detail.
Fred Leuchter is the man who first showed that the alleged "gas chambers" at Auschwitz were hoaxes. As an expert in gas chamber execution technology, he starts out by convincingly explaining why no human beings could have been, or were killed in these rooms by Zyklon B poison gas.
A very important video. Kudos to the Rizoli brothers for their excellent work and dedication, and to Fred Leuchter for his expertise and courage.
Please go here to watch it full screen, and leave a comment if you can.
Category
Holocaust Revisionism
Read more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7aP...ature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7aP...ature=youtu.be
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Awesome interview with Fred Leuchter above. I hadn't watched at the time I posted but since have, enjoyable throughout coz Leuchter is a real character. :D
3 recent from John Friend:
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...ei-420x240.jpg
Why Can We Question Anything but the “Holocaust”?
October 19, 2015 Leave a comment
A California college student is being targeted and demonized for using his brain to think critically and independently.
_______________________
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...t-15-90x90.png
Obama gives $12 million to “Holocaust survivors”
October 1, 2015 37 comments
________________________
Was He Really The Most Evil Man Alive?
September 25, 2015 Realist Report 23 comments
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...va-516x280.jpg
We have been lied to about Adolf Hitler and WWII.
Read more
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Carolyn Yeager gives no source link on this; I gather she's the source?! Go to the link to see 9 comments, first from Robert Faurisson:
Idiot Netanyahu invents new story of who "burned" the jews
Netanyahu hates the Palestinians so much that he's now tryng to make them equally guilty with the "Nazis" for exterminating 6 million of his precious jews during WW2.
In a meeting with Jewish leaders yesterday, he said the World War II-era Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, played a "central role in fomenting the final solution" by trying to convince Hitler to destroy the Jews during a 1941 meeting in Berlin.
"Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews," Netanyahu told the group. "And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, 'If you expel them, they'll all come here.' 'So what should I do with them?' [Hitler] asked. He said, 'Burn them.'"
The holohoax hoax-storians quickly objected to Netanyahu's unexpected change in the sacred story. "Any attempt to deflect the burden from Hitler to others is a form of Holocaust denial," said Moshe Zimmermann of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
This took place on the eve of Netanyahu's trip to Berlin to meet with German cohort Angela Merkel. There, standing side by side with Merkel, he changed his story, denying that he was exonerating Hitler of the responsibility for the Holocaust, but added that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was nevertheless glorifying the Grand Mufti.
"The real question should be directed not at me but at president Abbas: why is he and the Palestinian authority glorifying the official mufti of Jerusalem as a Palestinian icon? They call him the father of the Palestinian nation, this is a war criminal who was sought for war crimes."
Can't be glorifying any enemy of Israel, even if it's done by their own people. Clearly, he wants to denigrate the heroes of the Palestinians, and at the same time make the Palestinian nation as guilty as is the German nation. Control through guilt is a Jewish specialty.
Merkel remained non-plussed and said, as the good servant she is:
"Germany abides by its responsibility for the Holocaust. We don't see any reason to change our view of history. We are very clear in our minds about the National Socialist's responsibility for the breach of civilisation that was the Shoah."
She also said (in a rote kind of way) "the security and existence of Israel are part of the German raison d'etat, and this will remain so." [Unacceptable! This was NEVER a decision made by the German people; it was made at Nuremberg and continues to be enforced by the victors of WW2 but really, now, solely by the United States.]
So we expect that from Merkel, but here is something else to think about. Even though she speaks against building more Jewish settlements on Palestinian land (but doesn't enforce it in any way), she wimpily said "Israel has an obligation to protect its own citizens" and added that Palestinians should condemn "everything constituting the support of terror."
The problem is that Merkel doesn't believe in protecting her own citizens! As a total hypocrite, she knows that this monster Netanyahu would never allow Muslims to migrate into Israel because he is protecting his Jews and Israel's Jewish culture. Merkel stands there and supports him, while denying her own people the same.
Netanyahu behaves as a spoiled little boy, an over-indulged brat. Mutti Merkel is there to indulge him, at the expense of her own people. Both Netanyahu and Merkel muss weg.
Category
Holocaust Revisionism, Holocaust Industry Exposed, Immigration, Jews
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
^ not to paint DDuke as any kind of holohoax truth teller, but he did seize on this nuttyahoo story to make a good point, in today's podcast:
David Duke Show 2015.10.22
Dr. Duke: If Questioning Aspects of Holocaust Dogma is Illegal: "Prosecute Netanyahu for Defending Hitler!" Dr. Duke talked about Israeli PM Netanyahu's recent contention that Hitler didn't want to kill the Jews but rather wanted to let them emigrate, but it was in fact the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who suggested the "Final Solution." He noted that such a departure from the official Holocaust narrative would be enough to get a German thrown in jail, yet Netanyahu will be safe on his upcoming visit with Angela Merkel.
He and Dr. Slattery then talked about the incredible bald-face lies that the Zio New York Times prints, such as the constant mistranslating of Iranian President Ahmedinajad's comments about the eventual passing from the pages of time of the "regime occupying Jerusalem," despite having originally printed a correct translation of his speech.
Davids' site
Rense Archive
56k CF Download
Posted by zapoper at 2:42 PM No comments:
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Ursula Haverbeck (87) to 10 months in prison without probation 11/12/2015
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1pmXaO6V0k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1pmXaO6V0k
*The Holocaust Mega-post
From Google Translate: On Thursday, 12 November 2015 Mrs Ursula Haverbeck (87) was sentenced to ten (10) months in prison without parole by the magistrate Björn Jonsson (48) at the District Court of Hamburg. She had expressed publicly during the so-called. "Auschwitz trial" of Lueneburg against Oskar Gröning (94) in the spring of 2015, that they first do not believe in the criminally defined historical fact of the "Holocaust", 2. not criminally to the special established historical fact believe that it is in the German concentration camps such as have given gas chambers for the systematic, mass killing of Jews in Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, yes I can give. In their view, all spoke scientific evidence against this criminal reinforced "obviousness". Ms. Haverbeck will not accept the verdict of judge Jönsson and will file an appeal. The verdict against Ms. Haverbeck will therefore not be legally binding.
Posted by WHOOLI at 8:44 PM 3 comments:
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Ursula Haverbeck (87) to 10 months in prison without probation 11/12/2015
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1pmXaO6V0k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1pmXaO6V0k
*The Holocaust Mega-post
From Google Translate: On Thursday, 12 November 2015 Mrs Ursula Haverbeck (87) was sentenced to ten (10) months in prison without parole by the magistrate Björn Jonsson (48) at the District Court of Hamburg. She had expressed publicly during the so-called. "Auschwitz trial" of Lueneburg against Oskar Gröning (94) in the spring of 2015, that they first do not believe in the criminally defined historical fact of the "
Holocaust", 2. not criminally to the special established historical fact believe that it is in the German concentration camps such as have given gas chambers for the systematic, mass killing of Jews in Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, yes I can give. In their view, all spoke scientific evidence against this criminal reinforced "obviousness". Ms. Haverbeck will not accept the verdict of judge Jönsson and will file an appeal. The verdict against Ms. Haverbeck will therefore not be legally binding.
Posted by
WHOOLI at 8:44 PM
3 comments:
Germany is completely ass backward. The magistrate should be imprisoned for restricting free speech.
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
J. Friend:
More “Holocaust” Propaganda at the Oscar Awards
December 20, 2015 Realist Report Leave a comment
The fake Jewish “Holocaust” narrative is constantly and endlessly promoted, reinforced, and perpetuated not only by our mainstream educational and political establishment, but – perhaps even more importantly – also by the mass media and “entertainment” complex centered in Hollywood. The Jewish Daily Forward recently reported that, once again, “Holocaust”-themed films are up for Academy Awards at this year’s Oscars ceremony.
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...0-1024x295.png
Two films about the Holocaust and its aftermath have made the cut to compete for best foreign-language film. They were selected from among entries from 80 countries vying for Oscar honors, according to an announcement Thursday evening by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
Both entries, “Son of Saul” and “Labyrinth of Lies,” are among the critics’ favorites to garner an Academy Award — indicating, once again, that the Shoah retains its grip on the minds and souls of both international filmmakers and the members of the academy who cast their votes.
Last year, the foreign-language Oscar went to the Polish movie “Ida,” which followed the path of a devout young woman raised in a convent and about to take her vows as a nun. Suddenly, she learns that her parents were Jews who perished in the Holocaust and sets out to rediscover her roots. […]
It should come as no surprise to astute observers and critics of Hollywood and American popular culture that “Holocaust”-themed movies tend to be represented at the Oscars, with many of them actually winning Academy Awards.
Hollywood and American popular culture are entirely dominated and controlled by Jews with a specific agenda, namely, the demoralization, exploitation, and ultimate genocide of the White race. The fake “Holocaust” narrative, which has been scientifically and scholarly debunked by courageous and honest historians, is crucial to international Jewry’s global agenda directed at the destruction of the White race and Western civilization.
Indeed, Jews themselves have admitted that the “Holocaust” is a central factor to the Jewish takeover and domination of America and the wider Western world following WWII.
The lies told about Adolf Hitler, National Socialist Germany, and WWII generally form the basic historical paradigm the vast majority of Westerners hold today. The fake “Holocaust” narrative has not only advanced Jewish political, economic, and cultural interests, it has also served as a weapon used by Jewry to demonize and pathologize White identity. Jewish leaders often blame the entire White Western world for the entirely fictional “Holocaust” Jews allegedly experienced during WWII, and equate any sort of White racial consciousness with “White supremacy,” “Nazism,” and Adolf Hitler.
It is time for the world to recognize these basic facts, and understand the central role played by Hollywood and the mass media – which as stated previously are entirely controlled by Jews with a specifically anti-White agenda – in perpetuating the fake “Holocaust” narrative of WWII.
http://therealistreport.com/more-hol...-oscar-awards/
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
great JFriend interview here, 1h 20m. Here's the YT of this writer's holohoax song, also linked below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMNikDiN-Xc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMNikDiN-Xc
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...s-764x1024.jpg
The Realist Report – John Niems
December 30, 2015 Leave a comment
On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined by John Niems, a singer, songwriter, musician, and truth-seeker. In this podcast, John and I discussed his musical background, his views on the “Holocaust” and 9/11, and the importance of supporting honest truth seekers (rather than the Jewish mass media and “entertainment” industry!). Be sure to check out John’s great music!
Below are relevant links for this program:
Download MP3
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
2 new(ish) Jim Rizolli interviews with prominent revisionists. I really like last month's with Bradley Smith (who's apparently in his last days-- lung cancer, lymphoma, & getting western allopahthic poison/burn "treatment" :rolleyes:); they discuss Smith's former activism in placing holohoax-truth print ads in university newspapers. Smith was also on Donahue show with David Cole, who walked off the set iin the middle of the show.
also check Rizolli's YT channel and (his brother?) Joe Rizolli's channel - also read reviews of Bradberry's book @ The Myth Of German Villainy.
The Defamation Experts™, ADL's action plan re combating Smith's uni campus newspaper ads:
Quote:
Table of Contents
Introduction
.................................................. .................................................. ...........................
......... 5
Anti-Defamation League
.................................................. .................................................. ............ 6
Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life
.................................................. ......................... 6
SECTION I: Holocaust Denial
.................................................. .................................................. .... 7
What is Holocaust Denial?
.................................................. .................................................. ........... 7
SECTION II: Holocaust Denial, Campus
Newspapers, and the First Amendment
............. 11
Campus Editors and the First Amendment
.................................................. .................................. 11
Advertising Policies
.................................................. .................................................. .................... 11
Statements from Campus Newspapers on Publishing Holocaust Denial
......................................... 12
SECTION III: Taking Action Against Holoca
ust Denial in Newspaper Advertisements
...... 16
Preventing Holocaust Denial
from Disturbing Your Campus
.................................................. ....... 16
Strategizing a Response When the Ad is Published
.................................................. ...................... 17
Sample Letter to the Editor
.................................................. .................................................. .... 19
Case Studies
.................................................. .................................................. ...........................
.... 21
APPENDIX I: Resources on the Holocaust
.................................................. .............................. 24
Web-based Resources
.................................................. .................................................. ................. 24
Text Resources
.................................................. .................................................. ...........................
25
APPENDIX II: ADL Background on Bradley Smith
.................................................. ................. 26
Bradley Smith: Ideology/Motivations
.................................................. ........................................... 27
Bradley Smith: Extremist Affiliations
.................................................. ........................................... 28
Bradley Smith: Background
.................................................. .................................................. ........ 28
Bradley Smith: In His Own Words
.................................................. ............................................... 33
This following HERETIC had the audacity to write "The Myth Of German Villainy"
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lc-l5AYu6fg/mqdefault.jpg
1:09:34
Ben Bradberry interview by Jim Rizoli
a relative quickie produced by Bradley Smith:
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Re this article just reposted at James Tracy's memoryholeblog;
January 17, 2016
Teaching 9/11 to Conspiracy Theorists 12
I commented:
Consider what resulted in SoCal's Rialto School District when a teacher gave his 8th graders a Critical Thinking assignment focused on
The Holocaust™, LOL :D
Startpage search:
Holocaust Rialto school
^ Educators shalt not mess with societies' rulers' malevolent foundational myths!
Jan 16 AFP article with 14 min Gahary/Fetzer interview embedded inside,
http://americanfreepress.net/firing-...k-is-cowardly/
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-conten...ey-768x445.jpg
Turning Tables on Holocaust Hoaxers
January 28, 2016 Mike Walsh 2 Comments
Holocaust hysteria is now reaching shrieking intensity. When reading the latest peculiar claims one feels the need to put one’s hands over one’s ears to keep the din down. Each time we open a newspaper, magazine or turn on the news we expose ourselves to an incessant cascade of increasingly bizarre claims.
Tedious though this is, we remember that every cloud has a silver lining. Clear thinking is never associated with manic anxiety. The fraudulent holocaust narrative is panicking. Promoters of this obscene money-making racket are no longer thinking clearly.
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-conten...1819759995.jpg
Israel held a Miss Holocaust Survivor Beauty Pageant in 2015.
Unhappily for holocaust supporters their hysterical ranting now has the opposite effect to that intended. Mainstream media readership suffers holocaust fatigue. Besides, it was all a long time ago and Malice in Wonderland is losing its credibility and its relevancy. Furthermore, agitated ‘holocaust denial’ claims actually attract the curious and fuel desire to investigate further. Curiosity opens up an internet-based Pandora’s Box which the fraudsters wish to remain closed.
Here then is opportunity for real historians, freethinkers and fraud investigators to ramp up the rhetoric. This is the time for organised collective responsibility that has at its core a strategy and a narrative.
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-conten...p18_Staff3.jpg
Bradley Smith ran essay-length ads in 17 college papers in ’91-’92.
Think of what we can do now.Firstly, the term ‘holocaust denial’ is an expression used by advocates of the holocaust industry. Like the term ‘Nazi’ it should never be part of the freethinker’s narrative. It is like going to the front your only defence being the hope that you’ll catch the enemy’s hand grenades and hurl them back at him. I wish keypads would automatically replace holocaust denier with holocaust investigator.
Secondly, Napoleon Bonaparte taught us that ‘the best form of defence is attack.’ Internet news resources now carry much more weight than does that of mainstream media. We are all columnists now and 65% of the open market is ours to play with. Apart from using the above tactics our response to the fraudulent holocaust should shift to debate on undeniable holocausts. This would turn the tables decisively and put mainstream media on the defensive.
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-conten...204_140814.jpg
We have are told endlessly about the Holocaust, but nothing is said of the Holodomor.
Using the power of the internet a new front should be opened up. This front will expose Jewish and Capitalist responsibility for the enslavement and slaughter of 70 to 100 million mostly European Christians. The blitzkrieg would seriously weaken the case of the holocaust frauds.
Putting them on the defensive it would draw attention to their double-standards and expose their guilt for heinous crimes on a scale that relegates the fanciful 6-million to the side-lines. By taking part in this rapid deployment all freethinkers could soon have the holocaust industry wishing they had never raised the holocaust industry narrative in the first place.
http://renegadetribune.com/turning-t...caust-hoaxers/
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Trailblazing Connecticut course is blueprint for future Holocaust education
2016-02-02 23:42
From: timesofisrael.com
http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_im...holo-large.jpg
As UN discussion seeks best means to connect to future generations, new high school program uses current events to help students better understand horrors of the past
As the Holocaust recedes further into history and as the era of the living witness closes, educators and researchers are grappling with how best to teach it to future generations.
“We need to create a real bond with history, to give it a human story rather than just present a series of frightening pictures of piles of bodies. We must make it relevant. We must constantly engage students, delivering the subject in bite-sized bursts,” said Jane Jacobs-Kimmelman, director of the International Relations Department at the International School for Holocaust Studies at Yad Vashem.
Jacobs-Kimmelman was one of several researchers and educators to participate in a discussion at the United Nations on Thursday about the future of Holocaust research and education. Of concern is how to make the Holocaust, which occurred more than 70 years ago, relevant to today’s students, particularly in places where there are few Jewish students or where perhaps students aren’t aware of their grandparents or great-grandparents’ stories.
Since 2013, laws mandating the inclusion of the Holocaust in curricula have been on the books in Austria, France, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. In the US, individual states decide on curriculum content. To date Holocaust education is mandatory in California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.
While Connecticut doesn’t mandate Holocaust education, schools include the Holocaust as part of the unit on World War II. Beyond that, many schools offer a variety of history electives on the subject.
At Weston High School in Connecticut, the course “Facing History and Ourselves” provides a blueprint for the future of Holocaust education. The semester-long history course, for juniors and seniors, uses current events to link students to the past, said Weston Public Schools social studies teacher Jennifer B. Klein.
...
Read the rest: timesofisrael.com
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Re this article just reposted at James Tracy's memoryholeblog;
January 17, 2016
Teaching 9/11 to Conspiracy Theorists 12
I commented:
Consider what resulted in SoCal's Rialto School District when a teacher gave his 8th graders a Critical Thinking assignment focused on
The Holocaust™, LOL :D
Startpage search:
Holocaust Rialto school
^ Educators shalt not mess with societies' rulers' malevolent foundational myths!
Jan 16 AFP article with 14 min Gahary/Fetzer interview embedded inside,
http://americanfreepress.net/firing-...k-is-cowardly/
The above comment which I submitted to Dr. Tracy's memoryholeblog thread approval queue, was rejected. :(
Yesterday in my UC Davis prof teaching students about weaponized PC, NWO thread, I remarked about Dr. Tracy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
[...]
In one interview
(which? http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/s...20%2820%29.gif), DH matter-of-factly mentioned Sandy Hoax as a staged/fake event, with a gun grab & pharma-friendly agenda-- the same avenue of inquiry which recently got "tenured" prof James Tracy run out of Florida Atlantic University
(listen to: James Tracy on Jeff Rense). And Dr. Tracy was also notably silent on dajooz problem too; although it was always interesting when he'd have a podcast guest who was joo-wise & vocal, like John Friend, and Tracy would play the "neutral good listener" without overtly agreeing or disagreeing, only asking questions.
1 hour each:
Dr. Tracy interviews JFriend:
Interview 68: John Friend
Steve Johnson interviews JTracy, 2nd half hour is all callers banging on djoo problem, listen to how Tracy responds:
The People Speak with Steve Johnson 2015.08.18
So a similar thing happened to me today (Sat Feb 6); in JTracy's latest blog entry: Gangstalking is Murder, I submitted to his approval queue a comment pointing to a year old Kevin Barrett interview with guest Steve Johnson of Houston, who told off GHWB in a pizza restaurant: “You murderous Zionist piece of s**t!”... videoed it, and uploaded to YT where it went viral. And he was gangstalked afterwards at his apartment. This interview is inside: "Greg Johnson: Why I cussed out Bush to his face – and don’t like Ron or Rand much either _ on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad Radio"
Perfectly on-topic thing to comment, right? Well, around ~12 hours later now, and it appears this comment was rejected (a couple other new comments did since appear). :( I'm afraid the reason is prolly the same as why my holohoax/Rialto school assignment comment was rejected... it's obvious from the Steve Johnson show description in the link above, that there's blunt talk about dajooz problem in this show, and/or "zoinism" problem (the "which 'joo/zio' language to use?" question is also discussed in the same interview).
So I say, shame on Dr. Tracy... he's already suffered the end of his career now, at least at FAU, but I think he'll find himself blacklisted from virtually all universities, resulting for his Sandy Hoax Truth activism; so that "threat" no longer hangs over him. But yet, he's still censoring comments which, even in roundabout ways, shine light the djooz problem. :(
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
I actually watched this 1h 38m Jim Rizoli interview with Mark Weber within a day or so of its Feb 11 publication;
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0cvCg4_wFD0/mqdefault.jpg
Jim Rizoli Mark Weber Interview Feb 2016
...but notice, I didn't make a bee line to this thread to repost it as normal. Coz Weber showed how sold out, compromised, co-opted he is; and I didn't want to "promote him." Says (he believes...:rolleyes:) there were limited homicidal "gassings" at this and that obscure work/detention/transfer camp. Says he estimates perhaps ~4M jooz died... touts how he agrees with (the new...:rolleyes:) David Irving on this & that, seeking cred-by-association.
Well thing is; Irving changed his public tune on the holohoax, after dajooz uncharacteristically/"mercifully" :rolleyes: early-released him from an Austrian prison term after only 13 months of his 3 year sentence... and whuduyuhknow; Irving's been (publicly) singing from the kosher 6M/gas-chambers song sheet since. And, albeit without such a publicly visible/obvious "deal" as Irving's, Weber cites his "agreement" with the (formerly, pre-"deal") legendary David Irving... anticipating that people will imagine the cred & integrity of the pre-deal Irving, NOT the "New Irving."
What's nice about the above Rizoli interview of Weber is, Rizoli doesn't let him off easy... insists on hearing what physical/forensic evidence Weber has for his proclaimed holohoax beliefs; and Weber squirms... citing this-n-that (fabricated) "diary" and such, and oh yeah, the New David Irving...:rolleyes:
I've seen Carolyn Yeager on the attack against Weber now & again over the past few years; you can search her site for "Weber." Her grievances mainly point to how "ineffective/do-nothing" he's been as director of the Institute for Historical Review (IHR). Yeager just wrote this short opening, as a pointer to a new article by Hadding Scott, published at Commitee for Open Discussion of the Holohoax (CODOH)... well worth your time, as a companion reader to go with the Rizoli/Weber interview above.
Critical review of Jim Rizoli's video interview of Mark Weber published at CODOH
Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-02-28 12:52
http://carolynyeager.net/sites/defau...?itok=5TgInXWWl
Corrected edition cover of the book
Ernst Zundel was prosecuted for in the
1988 Canadian "False News" trial.
Hadding Scott's critical review is titled:
Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker
An aid to comprehension for viewers of Jim Rizoli's interview of Mark Weber
Scott's opening explains why he thinks his review is necessary.
Anybody who has not taken a particular interest in Historical Revisionism is likely to find little to criticize in Mark Weber's statements to Jim Rizoli in this interview. Such a viewer will likely be impressed that Weber speaks well of Holocaust Revisionists and defends their right to raise "questions."
If Mark Weber were a professor at a university or a mainstream public figure, that would be a net benefit. The problem is that Mark Weber does not occupy any such position but is the director of the Institute for Historical Review. He is supposed to be a leader in Holocaust Revisionism, not a spectator benevolently defending that movement's free-speech rights.
Read Part One here.
Category Holocaust Revisionism
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
I see I forgot to post this Red Ice Radio interview with Jim Rizoli from Jan 29, but just as well coz Henrik only has the 1st hour free. But I noticed at Jim's brother Joe Rizoli's YT channel, there's a YT of the whole ~2hr show. Full desc & first hour (only) MP3 inside this red ice link,
Jim Rizoli - What Really Happened at Auschwitz? - Hour 1
and here's the whole 2 hr show on YT; I reco' the 2nd hour more, if you're already familiar with the basic holes in the kosher holohoax story. But first hour has some interesting introductory stuff about Jim & his brother's story.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iSE97FmXLyc/mqdefault.jpg
2:06:05
Red Ice Network interview with Jim Rizoli
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
63 min podcast hosted by GSUS member The Ogster. I'm about 3/4 through; heavy on the holohoax story & truther persecution so far. :)
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
2 most recent @ Yeagers; 1st is continuation of my Rizoli/Weber post 3 replies up:
Part 2 of "Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker" now at CODOH
Published by carolyn on Tue, 2016-03-08 17:31
http://carolynyeager.net/sites/defau...?itok=soQ4MmDj
Weber: "My view about the gas-chambers or gassings is the same essentially as David Irving. And I believe that Jews were gassed. Yes."
An aid to comprehension for viewers of Jim Rizoli's interview of Mark Weber (10 February 2016)
In the first part, I showed that Mark Weber, in his interview with Jim Rizoli (10 February 2016), consistently tried to avoid acknowledging any findings of Holocaust Revisionism, and also tried to conceal his past acknowledgment of such findings. In this part, the focus is on Weber's attempts to justify his retreat from Holocaust Revisionism.
Mark Weber gives several arguments to justify his current refusal to support the revisionist findings that he once supported in regard to the Holocaust. I was able to discern the following, somewhat contradictory arguments, listed here in ascending order of absurdity:
1. The question of whether the Holocaust-story is true or false is no longer relevant.
2. Although the truth about the Holocaust is relevant (contradicting the previous point) it should not be relevant!
3. There is no point in disputing the Holocaust because Jews really were gassed.
Please continue reading at CODOH
Tags
Institute for Historical Review,
Gas Chambers,
Aktion Reinhardt Camps,
David Irving
Category
Holocaust Revisionism
______________________
and this one is re Yeager's ongoing irrational anti-Shlomo-ic hate-filt poisekution of this poor innocent Nobel award winning holohoax actor & fiction writer....
Latest post at "Elie Wiesel Cons The World"
Where was tattoo-less Elie Wiesel in 1944 if not at Auschwitz?
http://carolynyeager.net/sites/defau...?itok=wQc8qDYk
IT’S HARD TO BELIEVE, after all I’ve written, that some people are still saying to me, “You shouldn’t say Wiesel has admitted he doesn’t have a tattoo, because what if it turns out he does. Then you’ll look foolish and set back revisionism.”
Turns out? How long do we wait for something to “turn out?”
Wiesel will be 88-years-old on September 30th of this year. Very few human bodies are able to carry on after their 90th year, so, without a consensus opinion from the revisionist community, we are looking at the prospect of an eternal “We’ll never know” pasted over the Elie Wiesel tattoo question. Naturally, this is what Wiesel supporters want, but should revisionists be content with never going beyond that, continuing to fear there will come a time he will dramatically pull up his sleeve for the cameras?
He’s already done so and we have the result in the image at right.
And what don’t people understand about logic? One doesn’t need a University course in logic to use common sense. Two plus two adds up to four – we don’t need a calculator to prove it, our fingers can tell us. What should we think of those who would say “But what if it doesn’t? What if our fingers turn out to be wrong?” Continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World
Newsletter
Carolyn Yeager
Category
Elie Wiesel
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Latest from Jim Rizoli < YT channel. Not sure what the story is re the 1h 46m version posted 3 days ago; vs the shorter 34m version titled "Fritz Berg on Joosh Racism" posted 2 days ago? Edit: I've had the short version playing for long enough to say, it's the same opening & Berg background spiel, then a cut/edited compilation of Berg's talking about joosh waycism & related atrocities.
I listened to most of the long version when it was posted... IIRC around the middle Berg gets into not only dismissing Weber & Irving as compromised; but he also gets into some frustrations he has with frenchman R.Faurissan & Ernst Zundel! I was "listening with one ear" as usual and I'd need to give it another shot with undivided attention to properly describe Berg's beef with the latter 2, but it seems it was technical shite.
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Joshua01
You have to wonder how much is propaganda - TEHRAN, Iran – Iran reportedly test-fired two ballistic missiles Wednesday with the phrase "Israel must be wiped out" written in Hebrew on them, a show of force by the Islamic Republic as U.S. Vice President Joe Biden visited Israel.
~~~~~
How did this information come out - did the county of Iran tell the associated press that they wrote this slogan, did a spy see someone write this on the side of the rocket ? I'm glad Iran has the ability to defend itself, you just have to laugh at the presentation to the American sheeple.
This interview with Ahmedinejad always comes to mind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykd-syzZ4ZY
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
New Years 2016 essay by elderly Frenchman, Robert Faurisson.... I just saw it through paging back through zio-persecuted Canadian Arthur Topham's site:
http://www.radicalpress.com/?s=faurisson
Search Results for: faurisson
The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical and Scientific Level By Robert Faurisson
January 14, 2016 by
admin 11 Comments
The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical
and Scientific Level
By Robert Faurisson
http://www.radicalpress.com/wp-conte....Faurisson.jpg
December 31, 2015
“The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.”
~ Robert Faurisson
In France and in the rest of the world historians and specialists of “the Holocaust” no longer know what to answer to the revisionists’ arguments. And to speak only of my own case, which has been going on since 1978 (that is, for some thirty-seven years), never has my country’s justice system, despite the tireless requests by self-righteous associations to rule against me on the substance of my writings or statements, been able to note therein the least trace of any rashness, negligence, deliberate ignorance, falsehood, falsification or lying. My adversaries, rich and powerful though they may be, have never succeeded in getting our judges to convict me on the merits of the conclusions reached through my research work which, for over half a century, has focused on what is commonly called “the genocide of the Jews”, “the Nazi gas chambers” and “the six million (or nearly)” Jewish victims of the Third Reich. At most, at the end countless cases I have lost suits (whether as plaintiff or defendant) or been found guilty mainly 1) for a malevolence, supposed but not demonstrated, towards the Jews, 2) for breaking the gayssotine (the Fabius-Gayssot or Faurisson Act, legislation of convenience specifically targeting the findings of my research) or 3) by virtue of the “good faith” (sic) of individuals like Léon Poliakov or Robert Badinter, even though found to be at fault by the judges themselves.
For years Poliakov had well and truly manipulated the writings of SS officer Kurt Gerstein (who, having “repented” (?), then committed suicide (?)), when not fabricating outright fragments of text to attribute to him. But the judges granted the presumption of good faith toPoliakov. He had been, we were told, “animated by the passionate and legitimate desire to inform the public about a period and about facts of contemporary history that were particularly tragic”. It was therefore appropriate to forgive him for having “perhaps, on minor points [sic!!!], broken scientific standards of rigour without, however, it being permissible to state that he is a manipulator or fabricator of texts”. As for Badinter, in 2006 he claimed that in 1981, when he was still barrister for the LICRA and just before becoming Minister of Justice, he had got a court to rule against me “for being a falsifier of history”. A decision of 2007 restored the truth and held that Badinter had “failed in his evidence” to demonstrate my alleged dishonesty; but, the court hastened to add, he had been in good faith. For want of both money and a lawyer (Eric Delcroix having retired – not without being refused honorary membership of the bar), I did not appeal and was forced to pay the Socialist millionaire the sum of €5,000. But at least since then I have had the satisfaction of being able to speak of “Robert Badinter, my liar, my slanderer… in good faith”.
An astute observer will have noted that the more our opponents sense the game is getting away from them on the historical or scientific level, the more they feel the need to increase their propagandistic drum beating, and the repression as well. In France, at this very moment, they are putting all their hopes in having Parliament pass a supergayssotine. Good for them! A few weeks short of my 87th birthday, I have six cases pending, four against me and two others that I have had to instigate, albeit quite unwillingly. Will my judges finally decide, in 2016, to leave us, my wife and me, destitute? Or are they getting ready simply to throw me into a prison of the République? It is understood beforehand, is it not?, that if they were to carry things to such extremes it would only be on the grounds of the noblest républicain principles and in the name of human rights.
Let’s consider our current Prime Minister. One day, Manuel Valls, in full pomposity, his mouth, heart and left hand clenched, let fly: “I am, by my wife, eternally linked to the Jewish community and Israel”. He saw himself as “eternal”: a vast programme! But fervour was leading him astray. He ought to come back down to earth, reconnect with the ground, get treatment and stop deluding himself: the revisionists have, already as of now, won the match.
As early as in 1983-1985, Raul Hilberg, surrendering to the arguments of “Faurisson and others…” had to drop the pretension of explaining, on the basis of valid arguments and documents of his own, that the Third Reich had, with proper Germanic efficiency, designed, prepared, developed, organised and financed the killing of millions of European Jews. The eminent Jewish American historian ended up finding himself reduced to trying to have us believe that this gigantic massacre had come about by the operation of the Holy Spirit or, in his words, by “an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading within a large bureaucracy” that had, on its own, spontaneously decided, it seemed, gradually to abandon written communication in favour of verbal or indeed telepathic exchange to such an extent that no written or material evidence bespoke the six million Jews’ (or, in Hilberg’s case, a bit fewer) had been systematically killed either on the Eastern Front or in the gas chambers, mainly at Auschwitz.
A number of historians or researchers, such as Arno Mayer, Jean-Claude Pressac and Robert Jan van Pelt, have also capitulated, in a more frank and direct manner. The first has had to admit, among other bitter observations, that “Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable”. The second, a protégé of the Klarsfeld couple, came to understand that the dossier of the official story of the Jews’ extermination, “rotten” with too many lies, was bound for “the rubbish bins of history”. The third has concluded that “Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about Auschwitz] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove”; despite this, millions of visitors there have been and continue to be shown a “gas chamber” said to be in its “original state”, as well as ruins of other alleged “gas chambers”. As for the figure of “six million”, never subjected to the least scientific verification, it is rooted in the most sordid of realities: an old American publicity slogan used already before 1900 and up to the end of the Second World War to collect a windfall of cash especially from the Jewish community. The searing words amounted to the cry “Six million of our brothers are dying in Europe [by the acts, according to circumstance, of Poland, the Balkan countries, Tsarist Russia, National-Socialist Germany…]; we await your money for the victims of this holocaust [sic already in 1919]!”
Manuel Valls, our Prime Minister, and François Hollande, President of our Republic, devote themselves to launching, in several foreign countries, warlike crusades of the kind that have backfired horribly for us French this year. To proceed as they do, contrary to the Constitution, they dispense with the approval of Parliament, either in advance or within forty days from the start of operations. On top of their foreign wars, conducted in the most cowardly as well as the most comfortable conditions, they instil an atmosphere of internecine war at home. They call “cowards” certain enemies who, after all, are inspired on a grand scale by the practices of our glorious Résistants: “Hey, killers with the bullet and the knife, kill quickly!” If François Hollande has the stature of a pedalo admiral, Mr Valls resembles Picrochole, that character in Rabelais whose Greek name means “bitter bile” and who regularly gets all excited at the prospect of going off to war. Mr Valls began with a crusade against the Saracens of today and against the real or supposed enemies of Israel but he is also on a campaign against the revisionists, against “Dieudonné in peace”, against Marine Le Pen – even though she has pushed her own father down the stairs – and even against his friends of the Socialist clan. A good suggestion for him would be to calm down, take care of himself, try to laugh with Dieudonné, reflect for a moment with the revisionists, allow historians or researchers to work as they wish and, at long last, spare us the flag-waving frenzy, the bugle-blowing, the verse and chorus of the Marseillaise on the “day of glory”, the “impure blood” and the “ferocious soldiers”. As we know, it is, unhappily, all too easy to take the French in with that sort of thing.
Such, today, are the modest New Year wishes for 2016 that I allow myself to make for that person, for his victims, for the French and for the rest of the world. But is it perhaps already asking too much?
For their part, the revisionists know what awaits them: the confirmation in the mainstream media, sooner or later, that they have already won a total victory on the historical and scientific level. The political and media powers will indeed have to resign themselves to the facts: persistence in gunboat policies abroad and in those of gagging and censorship at home will only dishonour them a bit more. For nothing.
The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.
The lies of “the Holocaust” are modelled on those of the First World War. All those “Nazi death-works”, like the ones at Auschwitz, are but a reprise of the myth of German “corpse factories” of 1914-1918. They were merely modernised by the adding of gas (Jewish-American version of November 1944) and sometimes of electricity (Jewish-Soviet version of February 1945). The good people, already generally not well disposed towards the practice of cremating the dead, were led to believe that Germany, a nation considered modern and known for having an abundance of engineers and chemists, had built structures containing, in addition to a cremation space, others called “gas chambers” (in reality, the “depositories”, Leichenhalle or Leichenkeller, technically designed to hold bodies awaiting cremation). Thus a certain propaganda has managed to persuade us that those Germans devils were dumb enough to house under the same roof, on one side, spaces full of a highly inflammable and explosive gas (the hydrocyanic acid or hydrogen cyanide contained in the pesticide Zyklon B, created in the 1920s) and, on the other side, crematory ovens that had to be laboriously brought to a temperature of 900° C.
In 1943 some of the men in charge of British war propaganda deplored “this gas chambers story”. For his part, the revisionist Germar Rudolf sums up the subject rather well in his Lectures on the Holocaust (Chicago, Theses & Dissertations Press, 2005, 566 p., p. 82-85). Even Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, a senior official of the Intelligence Service in London ready to believe just about any nonsense said against the Germans, was to write: “I feel certain that we are making a mistake in publicly giving credence to this gas chambers story” (p. 83). The trouble was that the British, undisputed champions of lying propaganda during the two world wars, needed those fables. On February 29, 1944 their Ministry of Information sent the BBC and the Church of England a circular letter of the greatest cynicism, requesting their respective cooperation for the spreading of propaganda on the basis of atrocity stories either already in circulation or currently being concocted. It was a matter of forestalling the disastrous effect that the Red Army, an ally, was inevitably to bring about in Central Europe by real atrocities (p. 84)! On these inventions, these fabrications and the wide-scale dissemination of enormous tall tales, two books remain of great interest: Edward J. Rozek’s Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland, New York, Wiley, 1958 and, especially, by Walter Laqueur (a Jew born in Breslau in 1921): The Terrible Secret, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980, 262 p., wherein we see Cavendish-Bentinck, him again, “Chairman of the British Intelligence Committee”, writing in July 1943 that “The Poles and, to a far greater extent the Jews, tend to exaggerate German atrocities in order to stoke us up” (p. 83).
Fifteen months ago, referring to the crisis that the historians of “the Holocaust” were experiencing, I wrote that there was “more and more water in their gas, and slack in their knotted rope”. Since January 2015 and the anniversary of the “liberation” of Auschwitz I have noted a sudden acceleration of the phenomenon. I have a whole file and a whole demonstration on the subject but the continuing judicial repression has not yet left me time to publish this information. In any case, for the historian, it has become captivating to observe the never-ending agony of the “magical gas chamber” (Céline in 1950). This agony is accompanied, as we have seen, by a redoubling of the repression of revisionism and a turning up of the volume of holocaustic propaganda. May our Picrochole refrain, then, from going on the stage and into a trance! He would have a stroke. He might even be cruelly snatched away from us. Who knows? He could precede in death a man who will be 87 years of age on January 25, 2016 and whom some have, thus far in vain, so often sought to kill, not for his ideas (he has hardly any) but for having wanted to publish the result of his research, which is summed up in a phrase of about sixty words. I repeat it here for memory, and to have done with it:
The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.
Note: For sources or references especially regarding certain points of this text one may consult the indices of the seven volumes of my Ecrits révisionnistes thus far published. On the Internet, for “The Victories of Revisionism” (11 December 2006), see
robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2006/12/victories-of-revisionism.html and for “The Victories of Revisionism (continued)” (September 11, 2011), see robertfaurisson.blogspot.it/2011/09/victories-of-revisionism-continued.html.
Aficionados of court rulings by imbeciles are invited to refer to pages 152-155 of the first volume, where there are some titbits from a decision handed down in 1979 by Dame Baluze-Frachet, judge of a Lyon police court. The good lady decreed back then that simply asking the question of the existence of the gas chambers was an affront not only to “good morals” but also to “the moral order”. The amusing bit of it is that by invoking “the moral order” she was advocating – although probably unawares – a value dear to count MacMahon, Marshal of France, President of the French Republic and perennial model of reactionary conservatism. “The moral order” was to return seventy years later on with… Marshal Pétain. As for the aficionados of behavioural curiosities, there is fare for them in the following two videos featuring the current head of the French government: “The left hand of Manuel Valls” and “Rally of March 19, 2014 – speech by Manuel Valls, Minister of the Interior”.
In preparation: 1) an article about an embarrassing secret of Serge Klarsfeld; 2) a study of the highly inflammable and explosive nature of hydrogen cyanide.
—-
Filed Under: Adolf Hitler, Arthur R. Butz, Auschwitz, Auschwitz-Birkenau, Did 6 Million Really Die?, Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, Editor's Zone, Faurisson Act, French PM Manuel Valls, Gas Chambers, German History, German justice system, Germany, Germany Must Perish!, Germar Rudolf, Hate Crime laws, Holocaust denial, Holocaust Lie, Holocaustianity, HOLODOMOR, Jew created "Nazi" and "Neo-Nazi" terms, Jew Manufactured "Hate Crime" Laws, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred toward Germany, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Lobby in France, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, President of French Republic, Professor Robert Faurisson, Revisionism, Revisionists
____________________
Find additional Faurisson articles @ Topham's site:
Jewish Terrorism & the French Police: the Despicable Case of Forty Years of Brutal Harassment of Revisionist Robert Faurisson by Robert Faurisson
September 14, 2014 by admin 4 Comments
Reply to Mark Weber by Robert Faurisson
January 12, 2009 by admin
New Police Raid at Dr. Faurisson’s home
November 17, 2008 by admin
A Speech of professor Robert Faurisson in the Tehran holocaust conference december 11, 2006
December 29, 2006 by admin
and on and on... :)
also check out his blog; a mix of french & eng translated articles: http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
collector
You have to wonder how much is propaganda -
TEHRAN, Iran – Iran reportedly test-fired two ballistic missiles Wednesday with the phrase "Israel must be wiped out" written in Hebrew on them, a show of force by the Islamic Republic as U.S. Vice President Joe Biden visited Israel.
~~~~~
How did this information come out - did the county of Iran tell the associated press that they wrote this slogan, did a spy see someone write this on the side of the rocket ? I'm glad Iran has the ability to defend itself, you just have to laugh at the presentation to the American sheeple.
This interview with Ahmedinejad always comes to mind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykd-syzZ4ZY
Iranians are a lot smarter than most people give them credit for
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Joshua01
Iranians are a lot smarter than most people give them credit for
"most people" (Westerners) are in the joo-stream-media (JSM) bubble of fake reality. Iran held (IIRC) 2 intl holohoax conferences over the past decade,
A Speech of professor Robert Faurisson in the Tehran holocaust conference december 11, 2006
and one about "Hollywoodism" re the destructive propaganda influence belching out of hollywood (jooovies, TV, music/vids); Startpage:
Iran Hollywoodism
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Latest from
Jim Rizoli < YT channel. Not sure what the story is re the 1h 46m version posted 3 days ago; vs the shorter 34m version titled
"Fritz Berg on Joosh Racism" posted 2 days ago?
Edit: I've had the short version playing for long enough to say, it's the same opening & Berg background spiel, then a cut/edited compilation of Berg's talking about joosh waycism & related atrocities.
I listened to most of the long version when it was posted...
IIRC around the middle Berg gets into not only dismissing Weber & Irving as compromised; but he also gets into some frustrations he has with frenchman R.Faurissan & Ernst Zundel! I was
"listening with one ear" as usual and I'd need to give it another shot with undivided attention to properly describe Berg's beef with the latter 2, but it seems it was technical shite. [...]
I noticed in a comment at Hadding's latest Weber interview article @ CYeager's site, Hadding gives this YT link to the Rizoli/Weber interview, dropping you off at the minute mark where Berg's Weber/Irving criticism begins (44m 31s): https://youtu.be/Apvg99bVCro?t=44m31s
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
@ Renegade Tribune, good stuff, 23 mins:
Dr. Pierce: Thoughts on the Holocaust
March 18, 2016
Youtube link
Dr. William Luther Pierce discusses one the hallowed Holocaust, which never actually took place. Sure, some jews died in the National Socialist work camps, but most them perished because the typhus epidemic. There was never any jew soap, lampshades, shrunken head, gas chambers for humans, or any extermination plan at all.
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
New Years 2016 essay by elderly Frenchman, Robert Faurisson.... I just saw it through paging back through
zio-persecuted Canadian Arthur Topham's site:
http://www.radicalpress.com/?s=faurisson
Search Results for: faurisson
The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical and Scientific Level By Robert Faurisson
January 14, 2016 by
admin 11 Comments
The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical
and Scientific Level
By Robert Faurisson
http://www.radicalpress.com/wp-conte....Faurisson.jpg
December 31, 2015
“The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.”
~ Robert Faurisson
In France and in the rest of the world historians and specialists of “the Holocaust” no longer know what to answer to the revisionists’ arguments. And to speak only of my own case, which has been going on since 1978 (that is, for some thirty-seven years), never has my country’s justice system, despite the tireless requests by self-righteous associations to rule against me on the substance of my writings or statements, been able to note therein the least trace of any rashness, negligence, deliberate ignorance, falsehood, falsification or lying. My adversaries, rich and powerful though they may be, have never succeeded in getting our judges to convict me on the merits of the conclusions reached through my research work which, for over half a century, has focused on what is commonly called “the genocide of the Jews”, “the Nazi gas chambers” and “the six million (or nearly)” Jewish victims of the Third Reich. At most, at the end countless cases I have lost suits (whether as plaintiff or defendant) or been found guilty mainly 1) for a malevolence, supposed but not demonstrated, towards the Jews, 2) for breaking the gayssotine (the Fabius-Gayssot or Faurisson Act, legislation of convenience specifically targeting the findings of my research) or 3) by virtue of the “good faith” (sic) of individuals like Léon Poliakov or Robert Badinter, even though found to be at fault by the judges themselves.
For years Poliakov had well and truly manipulated the writings of SS officer Kurt Gerstein (who, having “repented” (?), then committed suicide (?)), when not fabricating outright fragments of text to attribute to him. But the judges granted the presumption of good faith toPoliakov. He had been, we were told, “animated by the passionate and legitimate desire to inform the public about a period and about facts of contemporary history that were particularly tragic”. It was therefore appropriate to forgive him for having “perhaps, on minor points [sic!!!], broken scientific standards of rigour without, however, it being permissible to state that he is a manipulator or fabricator of texts”. As for Badinter, in 2006 he claimed that in 1981, when he was still barrister for the LICRA and just before becoming Minister of Justice, he had got a court to rule against me “for being a falsifier of history”. A decision of 2007 restored the truth and held that Badinter had “failed in his evidence” to demonstrate my alleged dishonesty; but, the court hastened to add, he had been in good faith. For want of both money and a lawyer (Eric Delcroix having retired – not without being refused honorary membership of the bar), I did not appeal and was forced to pay the Socialist millionaire the sum of €5,000. But at least since then I have had the satisfaction of being able to speak of “Robert Badinter, my liar, my slanderer… in good faith”.
An astute observer will have noted that the more our opponents sense the game is getting away from them on the historical or scientific level, the more they feel the need to increase their propagandistic drum beating, and the repression as well. In France, at this very moment, they are putting all their hopes in having Parliament pass a supergayssotine. Good for them! A few weeks short of my 87th birthday, I have six cases pending, four against me and two others that I have had to instigate, albeit quite unwillingly. Will my judges finally decide, in 2016, to leave us, my wife and me, destitute? Or are they getting ready simply to throw me into a prison of the République? It is understood beforehand, is it not?, that if they were to carry things to such extremes it would only be on the grounds of the noblest républicain principles and in the name of human rights.
Let’s consider our current Prime Minister. One day, Manuel Valls, in full pomposity, his mouth, heart and left hand clenched, let fly: “I am, by my wife, eternally linked to the Jewish community and Israel”. He saw himself as “eternal”: a vast programme! But fervour was leading him astray. He ought to come back down to earth, reconnect with the ground, get treatment and stop deluding himself: the revisionists have, already as of now, won the match.
As early as in 1983-1985, Raul Hilberg, surrendering to the arguments of “Faurisson and others…” had to drop the pretension of explaining, on the basis of valid arguments and documents of his own, that the Third Reich had, with proper Germanic efficiency, designed, prepared, developed, organised and financed the killing of millions of European Jews. The eminent Jewish American historian ended up finding himself reduced to trying to have us believe that this gigantic massacre had come about by the operation of the Holy Spirit or, in his words, by “an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading within a large bureaucracy” that had, on its own, spontaneously decided, it seemed, gradually to abandon written communication in favour of verbal or indeed telepathic exchange to such an extent that no written or material evidence bespoke the six million Jews’ (or, in Hilberg’s case, a bit fewer) had been systematically killed either on the Eastern Front or in the gas chambers, mainly at Auschwitz.
A number of historians or researchers, such as Arno Mayer, Jean-Claude Pressac and Robert Jan van Pelt, have also capitulated, in a more frank and direct manner. The first has had to admit, among other bitter observations, that “Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable”. The second, a protégé of the Klarsfeld couple, came to understand that the dossier of the official story of the Jews’ extermination, “rotten” with too many lies, was bound for “the rubbish bins of history”. The third has concluded that “Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about Auschwitz] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove”; despite this, millions of visitors there have been and continue to be shown a “gas chamber” said to be in its “original state”, as well as ruins of other alleged “gas chambers”. As for the figure of “six million”, never subjected to the least scientific verification, it is rooted in the most sordid of realities: an old American publicity slogan used already before 1900 and up to the end of the Second World War to collect a windfall of cash especially from the Jewish community. The searing words amounted to the cry “Six million of our brothers are dying in Europe [by the acts, according to circumstance, of Poland, the Balkan countries, Tsarist Russia, National-Socialist Germany…]; we await your money for the victims of this holocaust [sic already in 1919]!”
Manuel Valls, our Prime Minister, and François Hollande, President of our Republic, devote themselves to launching, in several foreign countries, warlike crusades of the kind that have backfired horribly for us French this year. To proceed as they do, contrary to the Constitution, they dispense with the approval of Parliament, either in advance or within forty days from the start of operations. On top of their foreign wars, conducted in the most cowardly as well as the most comfortable conditions, they instil an atmosphere of internecine war at home. They call “cowards” certain enemies who, after all, are inspired on a grand scale by the practices of our glorious Résistants: “Hey, killers with the bullet and the knife, kill quickly!” If François Hollande has the stature of a pedalo admiral, Mr Valls resembles Picrochole, that character in Rabelais whose Greek name means “bitter bile” and who regularly gets all excited at the prospect of going off to war. Mr Valls began with a crusade against the Saracens of today and against the real or supposed enemies of Israel but he is also on a campaign against the revisionists, against “Dieudonné in peace”, against Marine Le Pen – even though she has pushed her own father down the stairs – and even against his friends of the Socialist clan. A good suggestion for him would be to calm down, take care of himself, try to laugh with Dieudonné, reflect for a moment with the revisionists, allow historians or researchers to work as they wish and, at long last, spare us the flag-waving frenzy, the bugle-blowing, the verse and chorus of the Marseillaise on the “day of glory”, the “impure blood” and the “ferocious soldiers”. As we know, it is, unhappily, all too easy to take the French in with that sort of thing.
Such, today, are the modest New Year wishes for 2016 that I allow myself to make for that person, for his victims, for the French and for the rest of the world. But is it perhaps already asking too much?
For their part, the revisionists know what awaits them: the confirmation in the mainstream media, sooner or later, that they have already won a total victory on the historical and scientific level. The political and media powers will indeed have to resign themselves to the facts: persistence in gunboat policies abroad and in those of gagging and censorship at home will only dishonour them a bit more. For nothing.
The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.
The lies of “the Holocaust” are modelled on those of the First World War. All those “Nazi death-works”, like the ones at Auschwitz, are but a reprise of the myth of German “corpse factories” of 1914-1918. They were merely modernised by the adding of gas (Jewish-American version of November 1944) and sometimes of electricity (Jewish-Soviet version of February 1945). The good people, already generally not well disposed towards the practice of cremating the dead, were led to believe that Germany, a nation considered modern and known for having an abundance of engineers and chemists, had built structures containing, in addition to a cremation space, others called “gas chambers” (in reality, the “depositories”, Leichenhalle or Leichenkeller, technically designed to hold bodies awaiting cremation). Thus a certain propaganda has managed to persuade us that those Germans devils were dumb enough to house under the same roof, on one side, spaces full of a highly inflammable and explosive gas (the hydrocyanic acid or hydrogen cyanide contained in the pesticide Zyklon B, created in the 1920s) and, on the other side, crematory ovens that had to be laboriously brought to a temperature of 900° C.
In 1943 some of the men in charge of British war propaganda deplored “this gas chambers story”. For his part, the revisionist Germar Rudolf sums up the subject rather well in his Lectures on the Holocaust (Chicago, Theses & Dissertations Press, 2005, 566 p., p. 82-85). Even Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, a senior official of the Intelligence Service in London ready to believe just about any nonsense said against the Germans, was to write: “I feel certain that we are making a mistake in publicly giving credence to this gas chambers story” (p. 83). The trouble was that the British, undisputed champions of lying propaganda during the two world wars, needed those fables. On February 29, 1944 their Ministry of Information sent the BBC and the Church of England a circular letter of the greatest cynicism, requesting their respective cooperation for the spreading of propaganda on the basis of atrocity stories either already in circulation or currently being concocted. It was a matter of forestalling the disastrous effect that the Red Army, an ally, was inevitably to bring about in Central Europe by real atrocities (p. 84)! On these inventions, these fabrications and the wide-scale dissemination of enormous tall tales, two books remain of great interest: Edward J. Rozek’s Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland, New York, Wiley, 1958 and, especially, by Walter Laqueur (a Jew born in Breslau in 1921): The Terrible Secret, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980, 262 p., wherein we see Cavendish-Bentinck, him again, “Chairman of the British Intelligence Committee”, writing in July 1943 that “The Poles and, to a far greater extent the Jews, tend to exaggerate German atrocities in order to stoke us up” (p. 83).
Fifteen months ago, referring to the crisis that the historians of “the Holocaust” were experiencing, I wrote that there was “more and more water in their gas, and slack in their knotted rope”. Since January 2015 and the anniversary of the “liberation” of Auschwitz I have noted a sudden acceleration of the phenomenon. I have a whole file and a whole demonstration on the subject but the continuing judicial repression has not yet left me time to publish this information. In any case, for the historian, it has become captivating to observe the never-ending agony of the “magical gas chamber” (Céline in 1950). This agony is accompanied, as we have seen, by a redoubling of the repression of revisionism and a turning up of the volume of holocaustic propaganda. May our Picrochole refrain, then, from going on the stage and into a trance! He would have a stroke. He might even be cruelly snatched away from us. Who knows? He could precede in death a man who will be 87 years of age on January 25, 2016 and whom some have, thus far in vain, so often sought to kill, not for his ideas (he has hardly any) but for having wanted to publish the result of his research, which is summed up in a phrase of about sixty words. I repeat it here for memory, and to have done with it:
The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.
Note: For sources or references especially regarding certain points of this text one may consult the indices of the seven volumes of my Ecrits révisionnistes thus far published. On the Internet, for “The Victories of Revisionism” (11 December 2006), see
robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2006/12/victories-of-revisionism.html and for “The Victories of Revisionism (continued)” (September 11, 2011), see robertfaurisson.blogspot.it/2011/09/victories-of-revisionism-continued.html.
Aficionados of court rulings by imbeciles are invited to refer to pages 152-155 of the first volume, where there are some titbits from a decision handed down in 1979 by Dame Baluze-Frachet, judge of a Lyon police court. The good lady decreed back then that simply asking the question of the existence of the gas chambers was an affront not only to “good morals” but also to “the moral order”. The amusing bit of it is that by invoking “the moral order” she was advocating – although probably unawares – a value dear to count MacMahon, Marshal of France, President of the French Republic and perennial model of reactionary conservatism. “The moral order” was to return seventy years later on with… Marshal Pétain. As for the aficionados of behavioural curiosities, there is fare for them in the following two videos featuring the current head of the French government: “The left hand of Manuel Valls” and “Rally of March 19, 2014 – speech by Manuel Valls, Minister of the Interior”.
In preparation: 1) an article about an embarrassing secret of Serge Klarsfeld; 2) a study of the highly inflammable and explosive nature of hydrogen cyanide.
—-
Filed Under: Adolf Hitler, Arthur R. Butz, Auschwitz, Auschwitz-Birkenau, Did 6 Million Really Die?, Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, Editor's Zone, Faurisson Act, French PM Manuel Valls, Gas Chambers, German History, German justice system, Germany, Germany Must Perish!, Germar Rudolf, Hate Crime laws, Holocaust denial, Holocaust Lie, Holocaustianity, HOLODOMOR, Jew created "Nazi" and "Neo-Nazi" terms, Jew Manufactured "Hate Crime" Laws, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred toward Germany, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Lobby in France, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, President of French Republic, Professor Robert Faurisson, Revisionism, Revisionists
____________________
Find additional Faurisson articles @ Topham's site:
Jewish Terrorism & the French Police: the Despicable Case of Forty Years of Brutal Harassment of Revisionist Robert Faurisson by Robert Faurisson
September 14, 2014 by
admin 4 Comments
Reply to Mark Weber by Robert Faurisson
January 12, 2009 by
admin
New Police Raid at Dr. Faurisson’s home
November 17, 2008 by
admin
A Speech of professor Robert Faurisson in the Tehran holocaust conference december 11, 2006
December 29, 2006 by
admin
and on and on... :)
also check out his blog; a mix of french & eng translated articles:
http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/
God bless the brave Dr Faurisson. He has for a very long time been a shining light in an era of historical darkness!
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Neuro
God bless the brave Dr Faurisson. He has for a very long time been a shining light in an era of historical darkness!
Faurisson was anti-German during the war...
http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.se/1...obert.html?m=1
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Neuro
he was born Jan '29, so he'd have been like ~10 - 15yo through the war years. Just a boy, living in occupied France... so no surprise I guess.
Meta's page on him: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Robert_Faurisson
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Certainly not, his mother was English, so it is not strange at all. I don't think anyone can be expected to throw off the cultural indoctrination we are growing up in until the age of 25-30, when we start to collect sufficient amount of facts that contradict the dogma. Most never do it.
No shadow on him for that. I just thought his story of his growing up was interesting.
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
looks like I never posted this excellent JFriend interview of Jim Rizoli from Jan:
So I noticed JKaminski penned this article about Rizoli on March 16:
The Rizoli rebellion by John Kaminski March 16, 2016 by admin Leave a Comment
The Rizoli rebellion
Tenacious brothers battle immigration epidemic
and Holocaust hoax
Their motto: Exercise the courage of your convictions
By John Kaminski
I know a lot of keyboard warriors. Heck, I’m one myself, trying to convince people of the dangers we face without actually confronting them in the real world. Though my advice might be authentic, my actions are not, because I’m not out there in public battling the tyrants and swindlers who are busy ripping us off and killing those who oppose them.
Am I afraid of suffering the harsh penalties incurred by so many who have challenged the powers that be? You bet I am. Do I know the day will come when I will be forced into open warfare with the people who run our country and have turned it into a giant prison system? Absolutely I do. It could happen any day now. And each day this unpleasant but vital task inevitably draws closer.
Though I am definitely a member of an exclusive club that has tried for decades to alert my fellow citizens to the lethal danger we face living in a society governed by ruthless Jew bankers who have no real point to their lives other than stealing from others and murdering those who stand in their way, my admiration really goes out to my compatriots who step out from behind their keyboards and wade out into the public chaos to defend the courage of their convictions and expose the constant and profound crimes that are being perpetrated by our owners against ordinary people who don’t ever quite seem to grasp the danger of their own predicament and how near they are to losing everything, including their own lives.
I’ve observed Jim Rizoli stepping out into the public spotlight for ten years now, first as a courageous protester of this strange and mysterious epidemic of foreign born illegal aliens being inserted into towns all across America, seriously diminishing the lives of native-born Americans who have worked all their lives for their modest piece of the pie. They have been constantly betrayed by their own leaders.
Some might consider what Rizoli is doing as tilting at windmills, but others of a more intelligent nature realize he is a 21st century patriot running at top speed to try and prevent the descent of the United States into a thoughtless prison camp dominated by aliens from the Third World and the Warsaw ghetto.
This surreptitious sabotage of American culture has grown to epidemic proportions with a deliberate but secret program of importing Third World aliens into the U.S. that has wracked big cities and small towns with ungrateful non-English speaking migrants who overload social systems and steal jobs from unemployed locals who need them.
And more lately, Rizoli has become the chronicler of one of the great hoaxes of the 20th century, a lucrative scam that has persisted into the 21st century as disingenuous Jews continue to swindle governments around the world with their heinous heist known as Holocaust reparations.
He has done this by undertaking a series of YouTube videos aptly titled the League of Extraordinary Revisionists, introducing to the public those heroic truth tellers who have been savaged by the poisoned mainstream media yet have persevered to correct the damaging Jewish lies that not only caused the destruction of Germany back in World War II, but are now wrecking America and Europe with their Jewcentric political correctness that encourages perversion, anarchy and dependence on government to destroy a thousands of years old family structure that has been the bulwark of civilization and now teeters on the brink of ruin.
“The Holocaust is like a wheel with spokes that extend out from the center and poison all areas of human activity,” Rizoli likes to say.
He, like so many of us, has seen far too much of it. But he, like so few of us, has been slugging away at the corrupt basis of it for more than a decade, going nose to nose with the Jews who control the political cobwebs of every town in America.
Oddly, it was his resistance to the sudden appearance of hundreds of Brazilian immigrants in his hometown of Framingham, Mass. that eventually led him to correlate this social disease to Jewish power and more specifically to the lies that have been told about the Holocaust.
“It all goes back to immigration,” Jim says. “My brother Joe got into it first.” Joe still writes commentaries and passes on links to his brother, but it is Jim, accompanied by his new sidekick Diane King, who are constantly updating a remarkably thorough website (ccfiile.com — note the extra “i”, standing for Concerned Citizens and Friends of Illegal Immigration Law Enforcement) that contains both the story of their immigration battles with the corrupt town fathers as well as a unique and thorough set of files about the Jewish manipulation of reality.
“We held a meeting at the library, and right off the bat they jumped on us,” Jim explained. “They pegged us as racists and wouldn’t let us even talk about it.
“It made us more determined to go at it.”
It was the Rizolis’ stand against the barrage of immigrants overwhelming Framingham that initially got them in trouble with their community, repeatedly banned from their local cable TV channel, and on the Jewish Anti Defamation League’s target list as Holocaust denying anti-Semites. Its description of the Rizolis’ activities is absolutely heroic. http://archive.adl.org/nr/exeres/7f918ae0-1eeb-4037-b83a-46c92344a4a7,db7611a2-02cd-43af-8147-649e26813571,frameless.html
• During an October 2009 segment of his public access television show, which was aired during a primetime slot, Jim delivered a lengthy diatribe promoting Holocaust denial. He defended Holocaust denier and Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, instructed viewers to conduct their own research on the Holocaust to discover the “truth,” and directed people to visit Web sites that advance Holocaust denial.
• Jim Rizoli has attempted to defend his statements about the Holocaust to the Boston Globe, which reported in November 2009 that he “believes…only around 300,000 people died, not six million, and that the majority were not killed but ‘died of sickness and disease.'”
• During the same segment of his public access television show, Jim Rizoli alleged the existence of a “Zionist controlled government,” implying that Jews manipulate national and global institutions.
• Rizoli also claimed during the show that “a lot of the Jewish people are not going to be happy to hear this [referring to his recommendation to view videos that advance Holocaust denial] because this whole thing all stems upon Judaism [sic] and what happened with them.” This is an anti-Semitic implication that Jews fabricate the Holocaust to advance their own agenda.
• Joe Rizoli has questioned the severity of the Holocaust on the Jews. During an interview with the MetroWest Daily News in February 2004, he argued, “What happened to the Jews was atrocious, but you know what? Nine million people in Germany died in Dresden and related incidents. They say 13 to 20 million people died in Russia.” Rizoli went on to question, “Did the Holocaust happen? You define to me what the Holocaust is. I don’t know. There’s no letter or whatever that pinpoints Hitler saying it.”
• In 2004, Joe Rizoli signed an Internet petition supporting Ernst Zundel, who was fighting deportation to his home in Canada from the U.S., which he entered illegally. Reportedly, Rizoli became interested in Zundel after receiving a “ZGram,” an E-mail that Zundel’s wife, also a Holocaust denier, sent to subscribers. Ironically for a xenophobe, Rizoli spoke out against Zundel’s deportation, which was the result of Zundel’s illegal entry into the U.S.
As they say, one man’s meat is another man’s poison. To those onto the Jewish scam of the Holocaust, these are all admirable achievements. But to Jews, ever the promoters of lies and false stories, Rizoli’s unflinching achievements are anathema.
“We had a good following,” Jim remembers. “We became like celebrities because we had the balls enough to talk about illegal immigrants. It opened up the door to talk about it in the whole state. Even the governor came and talked to us. And a Brazilian station put us on down there.”
“Then I started getting into the Holocaust and even the immigration people were scared off,” he remembers.
“We took the most heat from then on. In 2010 we were banned by our cable station for a year for false allegations. We came back in 2011 with four shows. We were on 12 times a week.
“We were pounding away at the Jews. It’s a wonder that they didn’t kill us.”
The cable company shut them down again in 2014.
“Nobody would dare come on a show dealing with the Holocaust issue.”
Good fortune came Rizoli’s way about this time when he hooked up with Diane on Facebook and the pair have become teammates in a game most Americans are afraid to play — Holocaust revisionism.
What has gained Rizoli new found attention after years of battling the Jews in a beat up suburb of Boston now dominated by Brazilians is a series of YouTubes sketching the lives of famous historians who can tell the real story of World War II, which is not the one told in movies and on TV by paid shills who spout the bogus Jewish version of reality.
Be sure and check out the real heroes of the revisionist movement captured on film by JIm Rizoli.
These include, among many other luminaries, Fred Leuchter, author of the Leuchter Report that proved there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz; Robert Faurisson, the dean of Holocaust Revisionists who for more than a half century has been challenging the Jewish liars “to show me or draw me a picture of the gas chamber at Auschwitz”; Germar Rudolf, the German chemist jailed for his efforts at refining and reinforcing the evidence for the Holocaust hoax; and the late Bradley Smith, interviewed in the final months of his life after selfless decades of preaching historical sanity on college campuses with his Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust.
In addition, there are many other controversial topics covered in ccfiile.com — Holocaust Liars and Holocaust Truthers, Auschwitz and Treblinka, AIPAC and the Slave Trade, witch trials and Rizoli Uncensored.
Among the many highlights are a riveting account of the fake Boston Marathon bombing and a Police file that explains how public officials are allowed to commit crimes and get away with them.
“We’re not letting up,” says Joe, then making this writer not mention an event they’re in the process of unleashing on the public.
“It’s going to be a struggle forever,” says JIm. “I don’t know how we’re going to do it (“it” being to get the public to accept the real story of what happened in World War II in Germany).
“We just have to hang in there. We’re not looking to convert the world we’re just trying to get the word out.”
Rizoli is constantly emphasizing that “the Holocaust is the hub of what has gone wrong with the world.
“But I love the fight. I’m not going down on my knees. If I go down I’m going to be standing up. You have to do what you know is right.”
—
Support JIm Rizoli’s important work by mail at
Jim Rizoli (LOER), 94 Pond St., Framingham MA 01702, 508-872-7292.
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=9172
_________________________
Rizoli published this 69 min interview of Kaminski on Mar 15:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MI82rnIT52M/mqdefault.jpg
1:08:39
Jim Rizoli John Kaminski Interview March 2016
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
New Jim Rizoli "Extraordinary Revisionists" interview; haven't watched (will later), haven't actually heard of the guy!
Then 3 editions of "David Irving's Revised Revisionism"; a super short 1 min ver, 1 hr, and 2.5 hour entire interview. I guess the Rizoli bros are trying to make a point about Irving's duplicity, his "officially compromised" status.
55 mins:
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
New Jim Rizoli "Extraordinary Revisionists" interview; haven't watched (will later), haven't actually heard of the guy!
Then 3 editions of "David Irving's Revised Revisionism"; a super short 1 min ver, 1 hr, and 2.5 hour entire interview. I guess the Rizoli bros are trying to make a point about Irving's duplicity, his "officially compromised" status.
55 mins:
Pat, I just want to say thanks for all the excellent info you bring us here. Keep up the good work and research. I don't know how you find the time.
Wasn't Irving the courageous revisionist that spent prison time in Europe for speaking the truth about the Holocaust Hoax? It sounds as though they turned him. They must have given him some kind of 'special' incentive. I wonder what happened.
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
thx woodman :) As to Irving; it's like I said in my Mar 1 reply above somewhere,
Quote:
Well thing is; Irving changed his public tune on the holohoax, after dajooz uncharacteristically/"mercifully" :rolleyes: early-released him from an Austrian prison term after only 13 months of his 3 year sentence... and whuduyuhknow; Irving's been (publicly) singing from the kosher 6M/gas-chambers song sheet since. And, albeit without such a publicly visible/obvious "deal" as Irving's, Weber cites his "agreement" with the (formerly, pre-"deal") legendary David Irving... anticipating that people will imagine the cred & integrity of the pre-deal Irving, NOT the "New Irving."
we can only guess what else besides the obvious ^ above which Irving was incentivized with to sell out to the Dinjooz re their holohoax.
Incidentally, the 55 min Jim Rizoli's interview of Revisionist Michael Santomauro in my reply above is great; not overly long, and not a re-hash of the usual holohoax talking points-- more about Santomauro's (mostly negative) life experiences stemming from his holohoax truth activism; & the Dinjooz' global propaganda/monitoring/sabotage ops propping up their fictional HH narrative/swindle/goy-mind-fuck. Some Santomauro startpage results:
- RePortersNoteBook.com
michaelsantomauro.blogspot.com Proxy Highlight
4 days ago ... ... Free Historical Inquiry. Posted by Michael Santomauro at 7:10 PM No comments: Links to this post ... Blog Archive. ▽ 2016 (25). ▽ March (8).
- michael santomauro » ADL Blogs
blog.adl.org/tags/michael-santomauro Proxy Highlight
12 Jun 2012 ... Michael Santomauro, an anti-Israel blogger and Holocaust denier, alleged that the USS Liberty is a cover-up maintained by U.S.-based Jewish ...
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
15-Year-Old South Carolina Schoolgirl Writes Holocaust Denial Essay and gets top grade
Paul English March 10, 2016 15 Year Old South Carolina Schoolgirl Writes Holocaust Denial Essay – Gets Top Grade
2016-03-10T19:27:37+00:00 War 1 Comment Courtesy of Endzog HERE
http://i2.wp.com/endzog.files.wordpr...hoto.jpg?ssl=1
A young schoolgirl in South Carolina has written a report entitled “Holohoax” for a school project. Her teacher encouraged the young girl by not only giving her an A grade for the project but also conducting a short interview with her about the report and posting it online.
In one passage, she wrote: “The Jews show pictures of hair and clothing of women and children, claiming that they were used for soap and rugs after their owners being stripped of them and brutally killed. However, the truth lies in the fact that ‘The Germans were against typhus being allowed to spread, which was the real reason for shaving heads, fumigating buildings, and cremating corpses.’”
She added: “Also, there is no proof of the gassed Jews except for allegations made by hired phony witnesses. According to the Red Cross, ‘Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning.’”
http://i1.wp.com/endzog.files.wordpr...shot.png?ssl=1
The 15-year-old girl from Southern California who attends a public high school tells the story of how she recently became aware of questions concerning the holocaust. After hearing the establishment’s version of the ‘shoah’ in her history class for weeks along with persistent rumors that Obamacare included provisions for microchipping all Americans, she was very upset at all the frightening and traumatizing details. But then she had an encounter which led her to question what she had been taught, and decided to conduct her own investigation. Her essay:
Holohoax
A lie known worldwide, spreading to clueless people and creating disaster everywhere, has caused so many German lives to be spitefully taken. The “Holocaust”, an alleged story of millions of Jews being tortured in concentration camps, has been proven time and time again to be inaccurate, For the acclaimed number of murdered Jews to be true is impossible, proven so not only by logic, but also the fact that the “survivors” of these evens have been known to and even admitted to being paid to lie about it. This in itself should be proof enough of this act of misleading propaganda being false, but there is indeed more evidence.
One reason to believe that the Holocaust is a lie is that the Jews claimed to have been murdered in gas chambers, groups as a time. However, no evidence of such occurrences has been shown or documented. According to scientists who were assigned to study the bodies of the victims of World War 2, “Most of them died from typhus epidemics. Most of the rest of them died from starvation and lack of medical supply care resulting from allied bombing raids against food and medical supply lines.
(http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=holohoax)
The Jews show pictures of hair and clothing of women and children, claiming that they were used for soap and rugs after their owners being stripped of them and brutally killed. However, the truth lies in the fact that “The Germans were against typhus, which was the real reason for shaving heads, fumigating buildings, and cremating corpses.” (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=holohoax) Also, heads were shaved and people were gathered top be treated not with lethal gases in order to commit genocide, but with repellant, to stop the epidemic of head lice spreading throughout the camps.
Another thing that contradicts the lies of faulty “survivors” is that the number of Jews said to be killed in the camps was inaccurately stated. Six million Jews were supposedly killed in the Holocaust, when not even such an amount existed in Europe entirely, let alone Germany. “In 1939, there were nearly 15,700,000 Jews in the world. After the Second World War that number had risen to over 18,000,000 Jews. What this means is that of the 15,000,000 original Jews on the planet, 6,000,000 were gassed, leaving only some 9,000,000-plus. Then, the world Jewish population rebounded and doubled to over 18,000,000 in less than nine years – an astronomical feat, which astounded biologists and baby doctors everywhere!”
(http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-a...r-dummies.html)
Not only were the Jews not murdered, but were give a choice. “For that we must go back to one Ilea Ehrenburg,* chief Soviet propagandist during the Second World War and later on to die in Israel, who coined the mythic number on Dec. 22, 1944 – BEFORE tens of thousands of Jewish internees, given the choice of staying to be “liberated” by the Communists or going with their German captors, did not hesitate to choose the latter option!” (http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-a...r-dummies.html) Thus proving that the Jewish population was not forced to concentration camps to be scalped and gassed.
Not only do we have visible proof of the holocaust being a lie, but also some very trustworthy witness: The American Red Cross. The Red Cross was asked to do an investigation and search of the camps and corpses, and make accurate reports on their findings. “Says the Report: ‘In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorized to stay in each camp …’ (Vol. III, p. 83).” (http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd01.html)
In reading this, one may conclude that the Germans did not intentionally kill the Jews, but strove to maintain lives. Many of the allegations against the Germans made by Jews involved gas chambers, which they claimed to be stripped, shaved, and gathered into for a mass killing. However, in order for a gas chamber to exist on a premise, there must be airtight doors and high chimneys, neither of which was found at the former “death camps.” Also, there is no proof of the gassed Jews except for allegations made by hired phony witnesses. According to the Red Cross, “Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were murdered Germans – the equivalent of ten football fields should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one body has ever been discovered.” (http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm) If this is not proof enough, what else is needed? What excuse can be made in retort?
Lastly, without being given the evidence that it did happen as it is told, we are shown clues that the effects on Europe of World War 2 was much different; not a story that would benefit the Jews, giving them compensation each month for some thing that was simply a hyperbole.”
http://i2.wp.com/endzog.files.wordpr...5249.jpg?ssl=1
Related Posts
http://i0.wp.com/eurofolkradio.com/w...size=200%2C150
The Dresden Atrocity
http://i0.wp.com/eurofolkradio.com/w...size=200%2C150
Ted Nugent v The ADL
http://i1.wp.com/eurofolkradio.com/w...size=200%2C150
Wayne Hage, American Rancher, Interview
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
I somehow don't think this one willl make it past the mod queue @ memoryholeblog, check http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/04/05...comment-110982 and it should land on the comment if it appears. Posting here just for posterity;
BTW JT's "last paragraph" in that article re Pozner reads:
"... At the very least Pozner’s enduring fraud calls into further question the dubious features of the Sandy Hook massacre event as a whole, including the sincerity of the political leaders and “families” involved who have collectively reaped tens of millions in donations and federal taxpayer dollars (e.g. here and here) while terrorizing American citizens into parting with their precious rights and piece of mind."
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
-
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
New from Eric Hunt, via JFriend's, 91 mins
http://therealistreport.com/question...lieved-part-1/
https://youtu.be/RddqP0ABzwM
Questioning “The Holocaust” – Why We Believed (Part 1)
April 27, 2016 Realist Report Leave a comment
