150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters

theys retards no longer work for us there god is the government now

I was in a medical clinic today and while I waited I saw the 2016 summer edition of Range Magazine. I don't have a subscription but I think I'll subscribe because there are a lot of good articles in it.
There are several good articles in this one on the Bundy Ranch standoff and Oregon standoff. I didn't have time to finish the articles but have found them on the internet. I think they're pretty good.

They can be found here.

http://www.rangemagazine.com/feature...harassment.pdf

Professor Doom 1: Wheres the lube Youtube? Patriots sign union cards, more on military industrial complex

http://youtu.be/KweJsf5WkIg

https://youtu.be/KweJsf5WkIg

Good for the Arizona lawmakers, Nevada should step up also.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/

Legislators Blast DOJ Double Standard: Rancher Finicum vs. Occupy Leftists

Tuesday, 24 May 2016 Written by William F. Jasper


Seven state legislators from Arizona have called upon the attorneys general of the states of Arizona, Nevada “and any other states with standing,” to bring legal action against Oregon law-enforcement officials and prosecutors, as well as against the FBI, over the shooting death this past January of Arizona rancher Robert Lavoy Finicum.

In a letter to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and Nevada Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt, the Arizona lawmakers contrast the extreme treatment accorded Finicum, the Bundy ranching family, and their supporters versus the kid-glove treatment given to the violent and destructive leftist demonstrators of the various “Occupy” movements.


“Over the past 7-years, the U.S. Attorney General and the U.S. Justice Department have established a track record of repeatedly filing civil rights complaints, often in support of known criminals, typically against law enforcement officials and state and local governments,”

says the letter dated May 20, 2016, on the letterhead of Arizona State Representative Bob Thorpe. “However,” the letter continues,

“in the case of unarmed Arizona rancher Mr. LaVoy Finicum, who was shot 3-times in the back by Oregon law enforcement officials at a traffic stop, and his associates who are currently being held, charged and facing inaccurate and exaggerated charges, the Federal Government has not demonstrated any interest in protecting the guaranteed Constitutional and civil rights of these Arizona and Nevada citizens.”



“Whether you agree or disagree with their tactics of occupying public land within an Oregon wildlife refuge for 41-days,”
note the legislators,
“Finicum and his associates were merely exercising their Constitutionally guaranteed 1st Amendment rights of free speech, to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”


The legislators’ letter continues, pointing out the obvious, politically motivated differences in the federal government’s actions toward the protesters:


In order to keep this in context, none of the thousands of individuals involved in the politically motivated 4-month takeover of the Wisconsin State Capitol from February 14 – June 16, 2011, or the encampment and protests by the Occupy Wall Street movement that started on September 17, 2011 and lasted for many, many months, were treated in a similar manner. In both of these cases, that lasted dramatically longer than the Oregon wildlife refuge occupation of public land, considerable property damage occurred, and yet no individuals were shot, jailed or charged in a similar manner to those individuals within Oregon.


It should also be noted that the Wisconsin State Capitol takeover and the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations involved violence, threats, and intimidation, massive disruptions of official government operations, as well as hindrance of private transportation, disruption of private business, and damage to and destruction of private property. Contrast that with the Oregon wildlife sanctuary occupation, which took place out in the boondocks, did not inconvenience anyone, or cause any property damage.


The letter from Representative Thorpe is cosigned by Senator Don Shooter and Representatives Brenda Barton, Sonny Borrelli, Regina Cobb, Mark Finchem, and Jay Lawrence. It continues:

Similar to the IRS targeting scandal, it has been suggested that the noticeable difference between the Wisconsin and Occupy Wall Street occupations and the Oregon occupation is that the former was typically comprised of labor union and liberal individuals who are politically aligned with President Obama, and the later was typically comprised of conservative individuals who are not.

According to Thomas Jefferson, our 3rd U.S. President and author of the Declaration of Independence,
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."

Simply by exercising their Constitutionally guaranteed 1st Amendment rights, the late Finicum and his jailed and charged associates continue to face what some are calling government tyranny.


“It is the duty of the Attorneys General of the States of Arizona, Nevada and any other states with standing, to file civil rights complaints with the U.S. Justice Department against the Oregon law enforcement officials and prosecutors, and against the Federal Bureau of Investigation,”

say the legislators.

“Arizona and Nevada must ensure that their citizens are treated in a fair, transparent and legal manner, and that Oregon law enforcement officials justly face at a minimum manslaughter charges, and that FBI agents justly face at a minimum attempted manslaughter and falsifying evidence charges.”


Related articles:

LaVoy Finicum’s Family: New Video Release Shows Police/FBI Shooting Was “Murder”


Police-FBI Shooting of LaVoy Finicum — Where Are the Other Videos?


Oregon Standoff: Nevada Rancher Cliven Bundy Arrested, Occupiers Surrender


Wisconsin Protests: The Reforms, the Reality


The Federal Bootprint

Behind the Oregon Standoff

Enviro Extremists Call for Shooting Ranchers’ Cattle

Victims of the Federal Bootprint

Oregon Standoff: BLM’s “Burn ‘Em Out” Legacy — The Untold Backstory

Family, Second Witness Say LaVoy Finicum Was “Murdered”

FBI Release of Rancher Shooting Video: More Questions Than Answers


http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/23258-legislators-blast-doj-double-standard-rancher-finicum-vs-occupy-leftists

Advance to 4:15 to hear this property rights attorney's comments about environmental groups funded by federal government, then listen to the Pete Santilli video and Deb Jordan's comment about Carole Bundy's statement that the Bio-diversity group being the initial cause of the Bundy Ranch troubles.

http://youtu.be/OcMicp_7hdw

https://youtu.be/OcMicp_7hdw


http://youtu.be/DhZltP56oPg


https://youtu.be/DhZltP56oPg

I wonder when this boy will commit suicide with his hands tied behind his back

http://youtu.be/qfC39eUa1MY

https://youtu.be/qfC39eUa1MY

Mar 27.

http://youtu.be/MDpW5gJcp68

https://youtu.be/MDpW5gJcp68

After imprisoning Oregon ranchers, Obama to sign an executive order legalizing BLM tyranny to take over any land it wants

Source: Natural News – by LJ Devon

At the heart of a free and prosperous society is the principle of private property ownership. Without private property, the centralization and corrupting influence of power grows, as the freedom of the individual dissipates. Democratic socialism is a great example of the dissolution of private property, under which, the demands of the majority override those of the individual. The majority claims they have a “right” to the goods and services (property) of individuals and businesses. They then use the government as a vehicle of force to conscript property and take it.
It is much more liberating and moral to contract with others freely and compensate one another, making agreements mutually. It is better to earn one’s own keep, be responsible for personal decisions, and be respectful of each other’s personal property. The tenet of private property follows the principles of natural law, establishing boundaries so one party cannot harm or take from another.
When property is owned by the state, it is referred to as public property. Public property serves important purposes in today’s society; however, it can also be used to serve the interests of the powerful. When property is federalized and concentrated into the hands of the powerful, the individual ambitions of the people become stifled. When property is federalized and used for monopolistic purposes, individuals are herded and turned into serfs who must do as they are told. When property is concentrated into the control of powerful central planners, they decide what they think is best for everyone.
Today, an overwhelming amount of property in the Western United States is now owned and mismanaged by the federal government of the U.S., and is being used for international and secretive purposes (e.g. United Nations global sustainability programs, and large scale mining operations). According to statistics from TaxFoundation.org, the federal government now owns more than half of the land in the states of Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Idaho. The federal government owns over a third of the land in Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Wyoming and California. This is not good use of public property. This is power unchecked – a federal government accountable to no one.


Federal government finding new ways to take over property

Federal government bureaucracies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are being used as armies to intimidate and bully private property owners into complying with their demands. The EPA created the term, “Waters of the United States” to declare any rainwater that sinks into the ground as being connected to “navigable waters.” In this way, the EPA can dictate what individuals do with their private property, by declaring someone’s property a wetland, owned and overseen by the EPA. Private property owners are bullied into paying fines or giving up their property to the federal government through this tactic.
The BLM uses the same tactics to bully ranchers into paying grazing fees when their cattle roam freely and feed on the wild grasses of adjacent BLM land. This is what spurred the protests at the Bundy Ranch in Nevada. The armed BLM came to confiscate Bundy’s cattle, but backed down when the Bundys and other patriots defended their personal property.
When the Hammond family of Oregon attempted to save their cattle’s winter feed by starting back fires on their property, the flames inadvertently moved onto adjoining BLM land. Dwight and Steven Hammond now await a five year federal prison sentence because the BLM accused them of destroying federal property. These cases show that the power of the BLM is ridiculously out of control, unreasonable and dangerous. This case is the reason why there was a protest at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge inOregon. The protesters had every right to assemble peaceably, defend themselves, and speak their mind about government abuses, but the FBI arrived on the scene in paramilitary fashion, unjustly executing rancher Lavoy Finicum, arresting the peaceful assembly of ranchers, and even detaining a member of the press, Pete Santilli.


An even greater BLM land grab is in the making

U.S. Congressman Rob Bishop recently sent out a press release about 14 pages he uncovered from a Department of Interior (DOI) internal memo which details the Obama Administration’s plot to bypass Congress, and make it easier to confiscate and federalize land into the jurisdiction of the BLM.
The DOI memo reveals that a large BLM land grab is in the making. The pages reveal the need for an executive order which would bypass legislative hurdles by using an “Antiquities Act” to appropriate “cultural land” to be confiscated and managed by the BLM. The executive order would seek to target the “acute” problem of private land ownership that is adjacent to land already governed by the BLM. The targeted land includes 412,675 acres.
“In order to expand this network of treasured lands to include the diversity of landscapes currently managed by the BLM,” it states. The DOI memo also reveals, “The BLM recommends that any major funding increases be phased in over a five-year period to allow the BLM time to build capacity in order to accomplish the increased work-load.”
The war on private property ownership will continue in the West, as the BLM plans to take more and more land. The cries will grow louder to return public lands to the states, as individuals are forced to defend their private property against the federal government.
Sources include:
InvestmentWatchBlog.com
StateOfTheNation2012.com
TaxFoundation.org
RobertScottBell.com
Heavy.com
OregonLive.com
Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/054106_Bureau_of_Land_Management_seizures_liberty. html#ixzz49VOqoEOu



Share This Article...

Lazaro Ecenarro calls out corrupt co-conspirators

http://youtu.be/elumbshejGs

https://youtu.be/elumbshejGs

Three hour town hall meeting in Baker, Oregon May 28. Lazaro Ecenarro explains La Voy Finicum, Hammonds and Bundys complete story to local residents. Video 1. The entire meeting will be uploaded daily in ten minute segments

http://youtu.be/doVqKkyTQR0

https://youtu.be/doVqKkyTQR0