I find that I need to limit my study of PizzaGate to focus on the exposure of the individuals directly related to what was revealed in the WikiLeaks emails, including some emails not directly to/from John Podesta, but directly related to "Pizza" and politicos and political gatherings centered about pizza establishments and spirit cooking events.
I also would like to know if there are clear and strong legal grounds at least presenting themselves in the WikiLeaks pizza-related emails. We are certainly having disclosed to us now many many pedogate cases that appear to involved successful legal actions. However, the problem of pedogate has existed in my knowledge for many years and has existed in history for at least fifty years but there has been I would venture to say little or almost no legal prosecution of any of those historical cases.
I want to know about pieces of information that directly shine light on the actions of John Podesta, James Alefantis, David Brock, Bill and Hillary Clinton and possibly Podesta's brother, Barack Obama, and a few other people that I cannot think of right now. Then I want to study those pieces of information and discuss them, especially in light of how useful they would be toward the goal of making an immediate investigation and indictment ensue.
I strongly feel that the massive ostensible exposure and arrests connected to child trafficking and child abuse and pedophilia etc. we hear in the news these days is controlled, though possibly true and real, and is somehow serving to not get that the directly Pizza-related people named indicted and convicted and imprisoned for life. If that does not happen all the progress and success of pedogate prosecutions will still be good but pedogate still will continue on basically hidden and not stopped as it has for decades.
