Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

Quote:

---

"The jurisdiction of executive and judicial officers is co-extensive with the legislative powers of Congress (Chisholm v Georgia, 2 U.S. 419, 435, (1793), Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat., 738, 808 (1824)): If judicial officers do not have jurisdiction in a particular geographic area, such as the Union, the same is true for executive officers—and no United States attorney has presented evidence of constitutional authority despite being challenged for the same in every one of the nine cases in which Petitioner has been involved." John Parks Trowbridge Jr.

---

Anthony Thomas Dephue understands the federal government DOJ's position on driving our country further into the police state it has become. From his facebook:


https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...e8&oe=59B30B24


Anthony Thomas Dephue

9 hrs ·

Now, watch me piss almost everyone off in 3, 2, ...

http://www.idahostatesman.com/latest-…/article150120847.html

This article confirms what I have been saying for about a year. Congress, the DOJ, and the Judiciary are an Axis of Tyranny who, intentionally or not, do not act to secure the blessings of liberty in accordance with why Government is even instituted among man.

Let me piss off conservatives first.

Wake up people. This administration in DC is too distracted with the enormity of the Federal Government to be able to pause, do the right thing, and reign this problem in. DC is full of career political elitists that exists to preserve their own way of life. Not all of them, but most of them. Donald Trump is not going to do mid-term pardons for anyone. His brash character (that's not a criticism) keeps him wading in enough controversy to keep him plenty busy.

Jeff Sessions just told me everything I need to know about him. He believes that US Attorney's have an obligation to relentlessly pursue criminal charges against "the vast majority of suspects". This isn't intended to be a policy that moves toward balancing correction with incarceration for serious crimes. It is damn near borderline fascism that paves a road to a police state.

Think that's harsh? Ask Joe Robertson in Montana what happens...

WHEN YOU BUILD A POND ON YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY TO HEDGE AGAINST FIRE AND WATER HORSES... know where that guy is? FEDERAL PRISON. Oh, and he's 80 years old. And a veteran of the US Navy.

Gov't says he polluted downstream waters. I didn't see anyone go to jail over that toxin spill in Colorado a few years ago, did you?

Both sides of the aisle are the problem. Only a revolution will drain the swamp at this point. Since the Gov't loves to twist what you say in an indictment: I'll clarify that revolution is not a singular avenue to change that exclusively involves violence. Revolution begins in the hearts and minds of people. There are many ways to revolt. I will do it at the ballot box. I will do it with my voice... on the street, in public, online, and in my personal conversations. I am content to resist within the rule of law and vigorously champion natural rights and the pursuit of liberty.

My left leaning friends, your turn.

Sessions essentially props up the argument of the Gov't in the first Bundy Ranch trial, that essentially a Federal Agent can act with near impunity so long as no one dies and they are acting "within the scope of their duties". I guess that applies to the asshole who took the safety off of his .308 and started taking tension out of the trigger, acting with the intent to kill Eric J. Parker, because he erroneously perceived that Parker had pointed a weapon from the bridge he was standing on. That narrative crashed and burned in cross examination, when not a shred of video evidence showed what that agent claimed to have perceived. No worries though, he was acting within the scope of his employment.

Gloria Navarro (Chief "Judge", District of NV) proffers a policy that defines assault as occurring a law enforcement official feeling threatened by an otherwise lawfully carried firearm in plain sight. I don't even need to address that, the abject absurdity of the idea shines through any need of explanation.

Freedom is an illusion for those who either can't or choose not to see the cage that the Gov't has erected around us. I know people sitting in jail, right now, who have been convicted of no crimes, and have been there since 03 March 2016. Let me give you the 10K foot overview: citizens show up to protest, the Gov't threatens to kill them, almost 2 dozen go to jail. I know, you've seen the viral pics of a man laying prone on a bridge, and you think "that's out of control". OK... they reasonably feared for grave bodily injury or death and postured to defend women and children holding signs. I don't see how that can be criminalized given the circumstances, but that's just me.

Riddle me this, lover of the Gov't... Todd Engel took a picture of people pointing weapons at him, briefly crouched down behind a jersey barrier on a bridge, then ran over to two NHP troopers to tell them what he could see. He stayed there for over an hour. Pending appeal, he is guilty of interstate travel in aid of extortion and obstruction of the due administration of justice.

Then there's Ricky. He drove over to the protest with several hundred other people... stood on a bridge with his damned arms crossed for two hours, barely moved. But... because he is in a three-man militia and sent an e-mail, he is looking at life in prison. Luckily, people like Jeff Session advocate taking this very dangerous criminal off the streets.

How about Micah? This guy traveled from Arizona, attended a rally, and then observed the protest by sitting on his ass with knees tucked into his chest on a steep-slope bridge skirt. He's accused of taking an elevated, tactical position for the purpose of threatening Federal Officers. He sat and watched. But, he was there in camouflage... so send him to jail.

Joe... I've seen pictures of him at the protest with his damn hands straight up in the air. Nothing violent there. Oh, he did communicate by e-mail with some people about the incident, but lock his ass up.

Steve... salt of the earth guy who loves his family and friends. Crouched down behind a jersey barrier on a bridge after someone pointed out that there were snipers glassing protesters. He was armed to the teeth, ready to strike, right? Nope. His lawfully possessed weapon lay leaned against a jersey barrier while he looked at his potential murders through binoculars. Lock his ass up!

Dave... wandered into a "closure area" to see if his dad's cattle were being mistreated. A sniper and spotter observed from a hill, and the federal agency (who had no arrest power), beat him and detained him for as long as they legally could; he just wanted to keep the Gov't accountable to the public. Lock his ass up! Forever!

Ryan... got a phone call from BLM Agent Mike Johnson, who basically said, "we are here to round up all of your families cows and put you out of business, that's cool, right?". Ryan's (arguably natural) response? "Good luck boys, but I'd suggest you just go home". Lock his ass up! Destroy the key.

Pete... Journalist. traveled from OH to NV to cover a breaking story. Part of his brand is an unapologetic assertiveness that digs for the part of a story that isn't readily apparent. His video covered BLM Agents outright abusing protesters. He suggested that Americans who wanted to could come to Nevada to protest. We can't have that shit, now can we? Put him in hole and forget about him.

All of these men face life in prison. Six have gone to trial. the corrupt, amoral, social degenerate that was instrumental in securing an indictment shockingly didn't testify when his actions caught up to him and he became a liability for the Gov't... so much for the right to face your accuser. If you do nothing else, google "Dan Love". Here... I'll do it for you. Just follow this link: ( https://goo.gl/i7ilJJ )

^^^ This ^^^ is what happens when the DOJ aggressively pursues the most serious possible charges. The Judiciary colludes and Congressional statutes are wielded in such a way as to evince an underlying element of brutality. The "Department of Justice" is a misnomer of gargantuan proportions, second only to that stretch of I-78 west of Phila being called the Schuylkill "Expressway".

Democrat or Republican, the problem is still the same; one just gets us to the inevitable long-term outcome of a police state quicker than the other.

We stand together or we'll hang separately.
- I stand with the Bundys.
- I stand with Pete Santilli.
- I stand with my brothers from Idaho. I'll never stop fighting for them.
- I stand with Micah McGuire.
- I stand with Jason Patrick.
- I stand with Joe Robertson.
- I stand with most of these defendants.

... and I stand FOR LaVoy. I'd stand WITH him but OSP shot him three times in the back after the FBI put two rounds through his truck while his hands were in the air. So there's that...

But hey, jump on the Sessions bandwagon and keep this shit going; to the peril of Liberty.

*****
If you made it this far... we are soon going to roll out an initiative to make sure that these political prisoners have access to basic rights and needs, as much as we are able to. It will take all of us, but with all of all us doing just a little bit, we can make all the difference in the world. We refuse to look at them and say we didn't try. This endeavor will be narrowly focused on directly benefiting inmates, but it will champion other avenues of support.

Right now you can pledge support for people sitting in a cage like Ammon Bundy did for 13 hours.

In a few short weeks a silent auction will help support Andrea Parker's return to Las Vegas, for another trial.
Or, if you can't contribute financially, you could write any of these guys a letter. Letters are the fabric of morale. For the cost of an envelope, sheet of paper, and a stamp... (less than $1.00), you can uplift an inmate and keep them mentally healthy.

Do something.

The Gov't is using your tax dollars, to the tunes of hundreds of millions, to do exactly what Jeff Sessions wants. It's time to show them that we will not allow them to make an example of our own. We need to show the Gov't that this inquest is an exercise in futility.

It will take all of us; but we are capable.

Just do something...

https://external-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...BDLinmPEJVSiS2


US prosecutors told to push for more, harsher punishments

Sessions directs federal prosecutors to pursue the most serious charges possible against the vast majority of suspects, a reversal of Obama-era…

IDAHOSTATESMAN.COM

14 Likes10 Comments36 Shares

Share

The Unquestioned Power of a Federal Judge - Apathy and ignorance are the tyrants best friends.

The Unquestioned Power of a Federal Judge


APATHY AND IGNORANCE ARE THE TYRANT’S BEST FRIENDS.

May 13, 2017 Constitution, Featured, Freedom of the Press, Opinion, US

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...7/05/power.jpg

THUS SAITH THE LORD:
THE UNQUESTIONED POWER OF A FEDERAL JUDGE

by Loren Edward Pearce

When a prophet wanted the people to know that he was speaking with divine authority and that his words were to be unquestioningly obeyed, he would use the words, “Thus saith the Lord”, indicating that his words came from a higher source, and would be enforced by mortal agents of that deity. These words triggered immediate compliance and performance.

“And he said unto them, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side, and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbour.” Exodus 32:27
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...wn-150x150.jpg
THE ROYAL WE

In a similar manner, federal judges, when issuing an order, never speak in the first person, but speak in the third person, the Court. It is similar to the Royal We, the language style of royalty in Europe wherein the King or Queen never referred to themselves in the first person but in the third person, inferring that “We” included divine approval in company with God.

Attorneys and the parties before “the Bench” are expected to address “the Court” and not refer to Judge by name. In fact, on numerous occasions, Judge Navarro of Nevada, in rendering a decision, would say, “the Court finds….”, not “I find…”

While there is no conclusive evidence that the word Court was meant to substitute for the word Lord, there is plausible reason to believe that it evolved from similar thought patterns. Judges in ancient Israel were divinely appointed and their edicts were thought to reflect the word of God. Lord is a common designation for judges in Great Britain. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that the judge was expected to make decisions under a near godlike authority, thereby making their decisions difficult to challenge.

When the federal judges made the decision to arrest and to incarcerate the several Bundy, et. al. defendants for the Oregon and Nevada trials, they did so under the power of their discretion as a judge. Broad discretion is granted to judges. The discretion of a judge to take action is widely held to be difficult to overturn unless there is a clear showing of egregious error.

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...es-223x300.jpg
Judge Robert Jones

Appellate courts, consisting of former trial judges from lower courts, tend to protect each other in this Royal hierarchy of judges, and are reluctant to reverse a judge’s decision unless that judge has fallen out of favor with “the Team”.

Judge Robert Clive Jones, who presided over the Hage ranch case in which the BLM sought to bully the Hage’s into submitting to their authority, was punished by the Ninth Circuit for daring to take on a member of the federal team, the BLM.

THE ROYAL HIERCHY OF LOWER AND HIGHER FEDERAL COURTS HAVE EACH OTHER’S BACKS

A review of the government’s Bundy, et. al. case in recommending pretrial detention as provided for in the Bail Reform Act of 1984, provided scanty and insufficient evidence to support a claim that the Bundy, et. al. defendants were
1) flight risks and
2) a danger to society.

However, lacking clear and convincing evidence to justify pre-trial detention, the judge, armed with near unlimited authority, merely needed to declare something like this:
“The Court finds that (insert name) is likely to be a flight risk and that there is clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions can reasonably assure that he will not be a danger to society. Therefore, the Court orders detention of (insert name) pending trial. It is so ordered, (name of judge)”

Unfortunately, the defendants did not appeal the judge’s decision to imprison them pre-trial and pre-conviction. However, had they appealed, the panel of judges on the Ninth Circuit appellate court, most likely would have affirmed the lower judge’s decision, as they tend to have each other’s backs, especially when it involves a group of people who are an intelligent and lawful threat to the federal team (judge, prosecutors, BLM employees, federal law enforcement).

MAN WHO BEHEADED 5 YEAR OLD SON IS ALLOWED SUPERVISED RELEASE

In a shocking display of inconsistency and upside down, twisted logic, the court recently decided to release a man who beheaded his 5 year old son, based on the recommendation of court psychiatrists that he could enjoy release from prison under specified conditions. Disregarding the heinous nature of his crime and the potential for future dangerousness, the court decided to err on the side of liberty and granted him release under close supervision.

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...dy-300x200.jpg
Davey Bundy

Contrast that decision to the decision to not release Dave Bundy who had hundreds of favorable testimonies from friends and associates, and whose sheriff offered to take full responsibility in guaranteeing that he did not flee nor do anything dangerous. Known as a wonderful family man and a pillar of the community, Dave Bundy was as far from being dangerous as anyone can be. The court laughed off the sheriff’s offer and proceeded with the imprisonment of Dave Bundy who now has over 470 days of prison time without being found guilty.
Did I mention that Dave Bundy never beheaded his son?

FEDERAL JUDGE OMNIPOTENCE

A Hollywood or a fiction writer could not have made up something so fantastic as the true case of Judge Royal (his real name) Furgeson versus Jeff Baron.

Judge Ferguson declared, “I have the full force of the Navy, Army [and] Marines behind me. . . You are a fool, a fool, a fool to screw with a federal judge, and if you don’t understand that, I can make you understand it.”

What is most terrifying, is that Ferguson is correct. He does have the full faith and credit of the federal government behind him, enforced by all the assets and resources, including military (if necessary), of the federal government.

The courts, in collusion with congress, have given themselves unprecedented powers not even seen in the days of ancient Egypt or ancient Rome, given that the physical powers of the USA to impose its will on others far exceeds that of any government or dictatorship that has previously existed.

The above article points out that judges have immunity from the consequences of their abuse of discretion, never having to pay, through money or prison, for their abuse of discretion unless it involves violation of criminal code. Even then, the immunity from prosecution is an almost impenetrable barrier.

Professor Ben Stein recently commented to Fox News that Americans are becoming powerless against abuse of power by Stalinist, liberal judges who are “dictators in black robes.”

“The judiciary is out of control, not bound by anything except themselves.” said Stein.“Judges don’t have to be bound by the Constitution or the law.”

Therefore, the scales weigh heavily in favor of federal judges to have near Stalinist like powers in the courts and little fear of the consequences for their actions.

GARY HUNT VERSUS THE OMNIPOTENT POWER OF FEDERAL JUDGE ANNA BROWN
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...nt-150x150.jpg
Gary Hunt (photo credit: Redoubt News)

When Gary Hunt, received a cease and desist order from Anna Brown in the Oregon district and a subsequent order to appear at a show cause hearing in her Oregon District court, Gary Hunt rightfully and correctly chose not to acknowledge jurisdiction over his body given that Judge Anna Brown does not have jurisdiction in California where Gary Hunt resides.

Additionally, Brown does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter given that Hunt was not named as a party in the protective order issued by Brown. Hunt, a self taught student of the law and of the constitution, with a specialty in the freedom of the press, knew that there was an abundance of common law (stare decisis) which supports his position.

However, did jurisdiction really matter to Brown? Employing the same arrogance as Ferguson in the Baron case, Brown knew two things:

1. The U.S. Marshalls, FBI and any other federal law enforcement, would unquestionably obey her order to arrest Gary Hunt, all she had to do was issue it, and
2. That immunity for her from any error or abuse of discretion was nearly absolute.

Consequently, Brown dispatched the Marshals to arrest Hunt resulting in 7 days of prison, and all the horrors that come with prison (bad food, bad smells, bad company, mean staff, control of phones by prison gangs, sexual abuse, diesel therapy, loss of privacy and much more).

It is this writer’s opinion that the majority of the 320 million Americans are ignorant and indifferent as to how bad prison life is which in turn gives judges and prisons so much autonomy to commit atrocities.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u.../05/apathy.jpg

IF YOU ARE NOT TERRIFIED, YOU SHOULD BE

The article cited above, correctly states, “What happened to Baron, can happen to anyone”. This writer adds, what happened to the Bundys and the other defendants, what happened to the Hammonds, Joe Robertson and what has happened to thousands of other wrongfully imprisoned victims of federal courts, can happen to anyone.

After reading this article, you should begin calling your elected officials. Make an appointment to discuss an action plan for reigning in the near absolute power of the federal judges. Join other like minded groups to get this changed. Prepare model legislation and hand it to your congressional representative for introduction at the next legislative session. Grade them on their performance and then make that grade go viral.

It was ignorance and apathy by the populace that led to the rise of Hitler and Stalin. Apathy and ignorance are the tyrant’s best friends.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u.../05/survey.jpg

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• 33
  Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  33
• Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Nye County Sheriff Sharon Wehrly says Ammon Bundy suffered no criminal violation.


https://scontent-amt2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...b3&oe=59AA8C67

John Lamb's report on Sheriff Wehrly's handling of the private jail's treatment of Ammon Bundy 5/11/17

It appears the Nye County Sheriff's Office has told the protester they must by permits. I haven't listened to the video - John Lamb reports May15, 2017

http://youtu.be/ddsOuRLnIjo

https://youtu.be/ddsOuRLnIjo

They can make any damn rule they want as they presume we are all U.S. Citizens. It's too bad we haven't figured out a way to force them to prove we are such.

I'm probably going to get some big boo's here but, they are flying the War Flag of the United States. The Peacetime Flag has 13 vertical red and white stripes and blue stars on a white field on the upper inside corner.

http://www.barefootsworld.net/graphics/civilflag.gif

We need to stop volunteering to be slaves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

It's too bad we haven't figured out a way to force them to prove we are such.

---

It's a matter of logic. Let's say for an instant that you are occupying the office of 'US CITIZEN'. That office is de facto until proven to be de jure. The conversion of de facto to de jure is a matter of 1) an oath and 2) a bond and 3) a notice to the public. Even a naturalized US CITIZEN is defacto even though he might have a court certificate until he/she provides these actions.

So now most everyone is de facto and everyone presumes you are one (mostly for tax purposes). How do you prove you are not? One action that makes it clear that you are not is to make a presumption that you are and investigate peaceful actions you might take while holding this office. One such action (once you have figured out who is making the accusation) is to presume THEY are a US CITIZEN and then give 'em a quit claim deed to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500. The zip code is very important because you wouldn't want to give up a claim to the real residence but the fictional one best left behind 'cause you aren't going to be seeing any rent income coming from that residence any time soon.

[I wouldn't try giving the quit claim to any foreign powers though ... the notoriety might be fatal]

The reason this would work is because a US CITIZEN is the landlord, the baron, the slum lord.

And part of the de facto/de jure principle is that you cannot be even de facto in an office that doesn't exist. Therefore your accuser has made a determination that the office DOES in fact exist and that YOU are the occupant. The PLACE you are occupying is the residence you plan on quit claiming.

Status can be achieved in several ways. Levant et couchant is to bed down the night and spot the morning sun. Aghenhine is a status achieved first by being a stranger and spending the night, the second night you spend as a guest and the third night (and thereafter) you are aghenhine (or ... a member of the household/manor). Aghenhine is a trust position and it also means the manor is going to be responsible for your actions.

No legal advice intended in the above discussion. Just some food for thought when your brain becomes less entangled with issues of survival.

Kelli Stewart May17 update from 'Camp Liberty' near ths Southern Nevada Correctional Center in Nye County Nevada

http://youtu.be/tYcApwm7thI

https://youtu.be/tYcApwm7thI

There are literally dozens of videos produced around the Bundy trials. I have tried to pick a few that get the message out about the attacks in liberty, lossof private property rights promotion of for profit prisons and the ever increasing police state all driven by thw zionist greed entrenched in Washington DC.

Most everyone here is aware, maybe some lurkers will see and share the messsage.

Brand Thornton May 17,

http://youtu.be/CF9Q2AYwSfY

https://youtu.be/CF9Q2AYwSfY

The feds keep on beating a dead horse. They have no evidence a jury will convict on. Instead they drag this out as long as possible and get their pound of flesh. To be a government prosecutor you cannot have morals or any sense of decency.

Andrea Parker has an update on trial schedules.

http://youtu.be/MAFHBWR7L1g

https://youtu.be/MAFHBWR7L1g

FBI informant who is on the government's witness list has problems with the law in Colorado and in Arizona. One more reason for a jury not to believe the government narrative.

http://youtu.be/aQvXCWT4JCE

https://youtu.be/aQvXCWT4JCE

http://youtu.be/mQxdJqC-W6c

https://youtu.be/mQxdJqC-W6c