Adam Green analyzes ^
Operation BLACKOUT: Israel Hacking America 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDFg3ICq-cY
Printable View
Adam Green analyzes ^
Operation BLACKOUT: Israel Hacking America 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDFg3ICq-cY
TruNews w guest Whitney Webb, 43 mins
Doomsday Election 2020: Israeli Spies Run Drill Predicting Overthrow of America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW3vnrixxJs
recent Whitney Webb article re USA's joo election meddling prob,
https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb/sta...18758859067394
Whitney Webb @_whitneywebb
The unnerving conclusion to my 3-part series on Cybereason and foreign (and domestic) intel agencies meddling in the 2020 election with the apparent goal of annulling or cancelling it is now online:
How Government and Media Are Prepping America for a Failed 2020 Election
Russia, China and Iran are already being blamed for using tech to undermine the 2020 election. Yet, the very technologies they are allegedly using were created by a web of companies with deep ties to Israeli intelligence.
by Whitney Webb
I feel Rick Wiles really had the help of the Holy Spirit when he confronted yesterday, January 31 2020, that Israeli reporter, Cohen, about the spying and software of the Israelis.
Rick Wiles just received a phone call the same day of the interviews requesting him to be the guest on an RT show, so he had no preparation time for what I thought was his excellent testimony. He said he gets many such requests but almost always turns them down but he did accept yesterday. Rick Wiles was perfectly clear and outspoken and told it like it is. He left no big bombshell truth about Israel and the Mossad unmentioned. He covered every thing in an articulate poised way. Such a refreshing change from MSM and Fox News talking heads. Mr. Cohen just kept making the weak assertions over and over again and just looked like a pitiful joke.
This was a major breakthrough for truth about Israel technology and spy operations.
Rick Wiles also gave his Christian testimony and prayed for the Kingdom of Christ to take over the world and for Christ to help all the people of the world right now.
The silence was deafening in response to that.
https://twitter.com/MintPressNews/st...47893241827328
MintPress News
@MintPressNews
1h
SPECIAL REPORT: Despite #IowaCaucuses2020 fiasco, #Nevada#Democrats plan to use a new #software application for reporting results during the #NevadaCaucus scheduled for #February 22.
By: @_whitneywebb
https://mintpressnews.com/nevada-dem...oblems/264777/
https://twitter.com/DrREpstein/statu...14889584390144
Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein
Just out in @EpochTimes:
My latest take on the obscene threat that #BigTech companies pose to the free-and-fair election:
"Why Republicans Can't Win in 2020"
Forget the #Russians. They're not the problem. #election2020
February 24, 2020 Updated: February 24, 2020
Commentary
When it comes to election manipulation, left-leaning American technology companies make the Russians look like rank amateurs.
No matter which weak candidate the Democrats ultimately nominate, and even with Russia’s help, President Donald Trump can’t win the 2020 election. For that matter, in races nationwide in which the projected winning margins are small—say, under 5 percent or so—Republicans, in general, are likely to lose.
That’s because of new forces of influence that the internet has made possible in recent decades and that Big Tech companies—Google more aggressively than any other—have been determined to perfect since Armageddon Day—oh, sorry, Election Day—in 2016.
For the record, I’m neither a conservative nor a Trump supporter. But I love democracy and America more than I love any particular party or candidate, and rigorous research that I have been conducting since 2013 shows that Big Tech companies now have unprecedented power to sway elections.
While I cheer the fact that 95 percent of donations from tech companies and their employees go to Democrats, I can’t stand by and watch these companies undermine democracy. As long as I’m still breathing, I will do everything I can to stop that from happening—and, for the record, I’m NOT suicidal.
The threat these companies pose is far from trivial. For one thing, they can shift opinions and votes in numerous ways that people can’t detect.
Remember the rumors about that movie theater in New Jersey that got people to buy more Coke and popcorn using subliminal messages embedded into a film? Well, those rumors were a bit exaggerated—those messages actually had a minimal effect—but Google-and-the-Gang are now controlling a wide variety of subliminal methods of persuasion that can, in minutes, shift the voting preferences of 20 percent or more of undecided voters without anyone having the slightest idea they’ve been manipulated.
Worse still, they can use these techniques without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. In a leak of Google emails to the Wall Street Journal in 2018, one Googler asks his colleagues how the company can use “ephemeral experiences” to change people’s views about Trump’s travel ban.
Ephemeral experiences are those fleeting ones we have every day when we view online content that’s generated on-the-fly and isn’t stored anywhere: newsfeeds, search suggestions, search results, and so on. No authority can go back in time to see what search suggestions or search results you were shown, but dozens of randomized, controlled, double-blind experiments I’ve conducted show that such content can dramatically shift opinions and voting preferences. See the problem?
Speaking of content, I’m getting sick of seeing headlines about Russian interference in our elections. Unless the Russians suddenly figure out how to massively hack our voting machines—and shame on us if we’re incompetent enough to let that happen—there’s no evidence that bad actors such as Russia or the now-defunct Cambridge Analytica can shift more than a few thousand votes here and there. Generally speaking, all they can do is throw some biased content onto the internet. But content isn’t the problem anymore.
All that matters now is who has the power to decide what content people will see or will not see (censorship), and what order that content is presented in. That power is almost entirely in the hands of the arrogant executives at two U.S. companies. Their algorithms decide which content gets suppressed, the order in which content is shown, and which content goes viral. You can counter a TV ad with another TV ad, but if the tech execs are supporting one candidate or party, you can’t counteract their manipulations.
Forget the Russians. As I said when I testified before Congress last summer, if our own tech companies all favor the same presidential candidate this year—and that seems likely—I calculate that they can easily shift 15 million votes to that candidate without people knowing and without leaving a paper trail.
By the way, the more you know about someone, the easier it is to manipulate him or her. Google and Facebook have millions of pieces of information about every American voter, and they will be targeting their manipulations at the individual level for every single voter in every swing state. No one in the world except Google and Facebook can do that.
In President Eisenhower’s famous 1961 farewell address, he warned not only about the rise of a military-industrial complex; he also warned about the rise of a “technological elite” who could someday control our country without us knowing.
That day has come, my friends, and it’s too late for any law or regulation to make a difference—at least in the upcoming election. There’s only one way at this point to get these companies to take their digits off the scale, and that’s to do to them what they do to us and our children every day: monitor them aggressively.
We need to look over the shoulders of a diverse group of thousands of American voters—with their permission, of course—to aggregate and measure the ephemeral content that Google-and-the-Gang are showing them every day. When bias is detected that has the potential to shift votes, it needs to be reported immediately to the media, the Federal Election Commission, members of Congress, and other authorities. That will force the tech execs to back off; if they don’t, they’ll be risking humiliation, fines, and, quite possibly, criminal prosecution.
I’m building such a system now—a greatly expanded version of the monitoring systems I deployed in 2016 and 2018. If you value democracy, wish me luck, or, better yet, lend your support.
Robert Epstein, the former editor-in-chief of “Psychology Today,” is senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology. He has published 15 books and more than 300 articles on AI and other topics. To read Dr. Epstein’s full congressional testimony, click here. To learn more about or to support his research on online influence, visit MyGoogleResearch.com. Follow him on Twitter @DrREpstein.
PatColo, is this YOUR "latest take" "on the obscene threat that #BigTech companies pose to the free-and-fair election"
I and probably you and most on this forum are already well aware of the threat bigtech companies pose to free and fair elections. What do you find especially insightful about Dr. Epstein's insights? The harm they do goes far and beyond "free and fair elections" and the thing that is causing "obscene threat" is something that was in existence long before there was something called "bigtech". I am more concerned about the harm done to the abstract concepts of "free and fair".
Angelo John Gage interviews Whitney Webb, 69m:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QWA...ture=emb_title
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QWAgv3Bs4w
Cyber Treason with Whitney Webb
Today we are joined by writer, researcher, and former Mint Press contributor, Whitney Webb to discuss the cyber treason that is going on in our own big tech industries; specifically focusing on the company Cyber Reason and what their role is in all this, along other special interests undermining our country.
*** Whitney's Links ***
Twitter: https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/whitneywebbmpn
Her work: https://t.co/ISQlIao54R
Dr. Cynthia McKinney and Dr. Edwin Vieira on Dr. Vieira’s proposal for election integrity. About 40 minutes
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EX6MZcSWJiNk/