Printable View
I just don't see a missile leaving a neat hole like that when it explodes. Bricks are going to fly in every direction. Whatever made that hole was inert at the time of impact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
When is the thing exploding, and how is it getting to that point without exploding?
CIT has been dedicated to providing independent verifiable evidence demonstrating the true flight path of the Pentagon attack jet which ultimately proves it could not have hit the building as reported.
But is the government story flight path as shown in the official data, reports, and required by the physical damage even physically possible?
Pilots for 9/11 Truth released an article earlier this year demonstrating how the final leg of the official flight path is in fact mathematically impossible for a 757 or any transport aircraft for that matter.
Unfortunately the article was released with an error that was quickly noted by other members as well as detractors who came out with their own interpretations of this scenario and the problem presented.
As any honest scientist/professional would do, Pilots for 9/11 Truth quickly admitted the error and promised an update with corrected math.
Since the issue had become convoluted with so many people offering up alternative scenarios.....P4T determined it would be best to put out a video presentation not only with the corrected math, but also with complete animations with scale topography for accurate demonstrations along with completely addressing all of the alternative or "debunking" scenarios in detail and showing exactly WHY they are wrong.
They have done this and as it turns out, the entire premise of the initial article holds true and the "debunkers" have been shown to be disingenuous at best or blatantly deceiving at worst.
http://the911forum.freeforums.org/g-force-calcs-prove-pentagon-attack-flight-path-impossible-t59.html
Its a gas ballon (malatov) with a full metal jacket bullet up front.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
One of the "eyewitnesses" said she saw it "speed up towards the end of its path".
A pentagon witness stated that "it came straight down"
Scale of birds are most of the time unknowable to the human eye, as the only reference is sky.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yknxp...ture=endscreen
Ok, so how does the plane wreckage fit in all over the place?Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
When did they have time to move all that in there unnoticed after the missile hit?
I'm wondering why the fuselage created a perfectly round hole, while the engine and wings (which have all the fuel in them) don't even make a scratch on the wall.
WHY you guys eat into the TROLL?
http://www.airforce-technology.com/u...g-metals-7.jpgAttachment 4404Quote:
An AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missile in flight. A morphing wing could help future systems to fly faster to targets and then adapt to loiter before engaging to evaluate the effectiveness of earlier strikes.
http://www.airforce-technology.com/f...re91197-7.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypc4ieJO0pg&NR=1&feature=fvwp
Real Eyes Realize Real _______
And what took down the five light poles?
If they scattered that wreckage in there by hand, this is the best movie set I've ever seen. It would take days to create the level of realism required for a set like that.
i.e towards the end of the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8
http://www.ushmm.org/lcmedia/photo/w...e/75/75102.jpg
On February 27, 1933, the German parliament (Reichstag) building burned down due to arson. The government falsely portrayed the fire as part of a Communist effort to overthrow the state.
Using emergency constitutional powers, Adolf Hitler’s cabinet had issued a Decree for the Protection of the German People on February 4, 1933. This decree placed constraints on the press and authorized the police to ban political meetings and marches, effectively hindering electoral campaigning. A temporary measure, it was followed by a more dramatic and permanent suspension of civil rights following the February 27 burning of the parliament building.
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article....uleId=10007657