Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Did the comunista Judge Gloria Navarro seat the jury for the Retrial? From what we saw in Andrea Parker's videos yesterday that appears to be the case. These bastards blatantly flaunt their corruption and bias in full view of the public and nothing is done to stop them.
Did the Judge Select the Jury in Bunkerville Retrial?
SHE RE-SEATED THE JURORS DESPITE THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES FROM THE DEFENSE.
July 13, 2017 BLM, Constitution, DOJ, Featured, Nevada 1
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...Banner-JPG.jpg
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...on-678x381.jpg
Did the Judge Select the Jury in Bunkerville Retrial?
by Shari Dovale
Eric Parker, Ricky Lovelien, Steven Stewart and Scott Drexler are back in a Vegas courtroom for a retrial of charges related to the 2014 Bunkerville Standoff.
Judge Gloria Navarro declared a mistrial in the case in April when the jury could not reach a consensus for the majority of charges against the defendants.
Two of the defendants, Gregory Burlson and Todd Engel, were found guilty on some of the charges and will not be retried on the remaining charges. They are scheduled to be sentenced later this month.
Jury Selection in the new trial began this week with Judge Navarro immediately taking over the process.
From eyewitness accounts in the courtroom, we were told of the seemingly “rigged” system that the Judge used to select the jury she wanted.
Under Rule 24, The government has 6 peremptory challenges and the defendant or defendants jointly have 10 peremptory challenges when the defendant is charged with a crime punishable by imprisonment of more than one year. The court may allow additional peremptory challenges to multiple defendants, and may allow the defendants to exercise those challenges separately or jointly.
In this case, with four defendants, the defense began with 10 strikes and the prosecution with 6. Each party was given one additional strike. Specifically, each defendant was given an additional strike and the prosecution should have been given an additional strike as well.
Prior to jury selection beginning, the prosecution filed several motions. One of these motions was to have the prosecution receive an equal number of additional strikes as the defense. This is not considered fair to the defense of multiple defendants, and is not normally allowed.
Keep in mind that the “system” is supposed to be set up with the presumption of innocence for the defendants, and the burden placed upon the prosecution.
Judge Navarro, however, agreed with that motion and granted the prosecution 4 additional strikes. She also ruled in favor of the prosecution on every single pre-trial motion!
Her ruling brought the total challenges to 14 for the defense and 10 for the prosecution.
During the course of jury selection, after all strikes for “cause” were completed, the process began to strike members from the jury pool by both sides. This process does not need explanation, as each side has their own criteria to decide who they want removed. The exception to this rule is called a “Batson Challenge”.
Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that a prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenge in a criminal case—the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so—may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race. The Court ruled that this practice violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case gave rise to the term Batson challenge, an objection to a peremptory challenge based on the standard established by the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. (Wikipedia)
This is important for several reasons. The Batson case itself was a civil rights case. The Supreme Court was ruling on a Prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to exclude people strictly because of their race. This was, again, to keep the trial fair for the defendants.
Therefore, when a Batson challenge is made, the prosecutor needs to explain why his striking a juror was not based on their race. Most prosecutors can easily handle these questions, but it is important for them to put it on the record.
In today’s hearing, the challenges were such that the defense struck 7 men and 7 women. The prosecutions strikes were for 8 women and 2 men.
However, it was the prosecution that made an objection based on a Batson challenge and claimed that the defense was biased against men. They claimed that there were men removed from the jury pool wrongly. They accused the defense of gender-bias.
The defense should not have had to explain their criteria to the court. It is the defense, after all, and they do not have the burden of proof. However, Judge Navarro made the defense cite their reasoning for every challenge they made against the jurors, with one juror receiving what seemed to be special attention.
They explained that they felt an underlying deception from the prospective juror. Their ‘gut’ told them the person was not being honest. They did not want the person on the jury.
“There is a level of deception that has taken place here,” was the response from the defense team.
The judge made comments to the effect that the juror’s answers were what she would expect the defense to want.
They judge did not find any reason acceptable that the defense should have had 5 particular men removed, and she put them back on the jury. She re-seated these jurors despite the challenges from the defense. She effectively told the defense that they cannot have a say in who is kept or removed from the jury.
Not only did she put them back on the jury, but she took the 5 challenges completely away from the defense. They were now down to 9 when the prosecution still had 10. So the advantage again went straight to the government.
The defense, to their credit, then objected to the prosecution for the same Batson challenge, citing the fact that the prosecution used 80% of their challenges against women. Judge Navarro refused to rule on that objection and did not even open an inquiry on it. She completely brushed it under the rug and moved on.
This judge took complete control of selecting the jury by not allowing the defense their challenges. She had particular people she wanted on the jury (specifically juror number 296?) and she was not about to allow the defense to remove him. Could this be considered jury tampering?
Navarro has already shown her disregard for the US Constitution. She has already made it clear that she has an agenda with these defendants. She is clearly not going to allow another mistrial in this case and will do whatever it takes to get the verdict she desires. These citizens, that have been held for 18 months without bail, do not stand a chance.
This is how the communists in the former Soviet Union used to run their courts. Blatant rigging of the system. We have now, almost unbelievably, seen it in our own country. The country that is the supposed to be where Freedom Rings.
This has actually happened in the United States of America, in the Year of Our Lord 2017.
God help us!
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Roger Stone Bundy Support Rally in Las Vegas July 15
http://youtu.be/CEh9TatvXXE
https://youtu.be/CEh9TatvXXE
Roger Stone Announces Rally FOR FREEDOM For Bundys
roypotterqa 80 views
12K
8
0
Published on Jul 13, 2017Roger Stone Announces RALLY FOR FREEDOM July 15 for BUNDY POLITICAL PRISONERS by Lorri Andersonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7HOb...
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Chastity Bendele is the lady who held the terrified little girl yesterday in the federal courtroom while the U.S. Marshal was yelling at her mother. Chastity tells about her experience in a Facebook video:
https://m.facebook.com/itmattershowy...96185317196601
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Before Its News BUNDY RANCH: U.S. Federal Marshals Terrorize 6 Yr Old Girl . . . . .
The link in this post won't play the video. It is the video 2 posts above.
Bundy Ranch: U.S. Federal Marshals Terrorize 6 Yr Old Girl at Bundy Ranch Trial (Video)
(Before It's News)
http://beforeitsnews.com/contributor...2013_39_53.png
Day 3 Jury Selection July 12,2017 :Today was day 3 of Jury selection at the high profile Bundy Ranch Trial where political prisoners Eric Parker, Steven Stewart, Scott Drexler, and Ricky Lovlein are facing up to 90 yrs prison time if they are convicted on all the trumped up charges filed on behalf of the federal government.
I have been a court observer since the beginning of said first trial, and have been truly amazed at all the corruption and tyranny that occurs in that court on a daily basis. However, what I witnessed today July 12,2017 truly took my breath away. The U.S. Marshals, who get their orders from Judge Gloria Navarro, have always tried to be an intimidating force in that court room to show all of us Serfs who is the boss in this unconstitutional federal court room, But today, I truly believe that they crossed a line and will hopefully face appropriate consequences.
After we all came back from our last break of the day, a single mom with her adorable 6 yr old little girl came back to their seats, and apparently, a federal marshal named Josh saw that this single mom was eating something, that turned out to be a Tic Tac,and came over to where she was seated and got within 6 inches of her face and started barking at her for daring to have said tick tac in her mouth. This Federal Marshal towers over this 5ft 5inch girl by about 10 inches and out weighs her by at least 150 lbs. If this wasn’t enough, one of the other federal marshals came over to join in and scream at this single mom which finally made this 6 yr old girl so scared that she literally jumped over the court bench and into our row where she jumped into the arms of another woman who said, "she clinged to her like a spider monkey while shaking like a leaf and asked her to cover her ears because she thought the big men where going to hurt her mommy”.
I don’t know about you ladies and gentleman, but this is not the America I want our children to grow up in.
<<iframe allowfullscreen=”true” frameborder=”0″ height=”400″ scrolling=”no” src=”https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?
href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fchastity.ben dele%2Fvideos%2F10156362513553452%2F&show_text=0&w idth=225″ width=”225″> >
http://thepetesantillishow.com
https://www.facebook.com/petesantillinotguilty/
http://thepetesantillishow.com/donate/
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
There was nothing reported for the Bundy Retrial for yesterday. Maybe there was no court yesterday July 13. Court is in recess today. The trial will resume Monday. Tomorrow, Saturday July 15 Roger Stone has his Freedom Rally.
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
I am going to post this Alex Jones video with former Congressman Bob Barr because it is relevant to the Bundy situation. I don't plan on watching myself because I can't stomach Alex Jones.
This commenter pretty much sums up my feelings about Alex Jones:
https://yt3.ggpht.com/-ZRNjeRR5oTY/A...ffff/photo.jpg
John Wolf
You want to put a bow on this Alex because you want to constantly talk about trailer park trash Megyn Kelley while telling us how wonderful you are in destroying her career. We get it, Alex, you the man now do something about all the men that have been in solitary confinement for over a year in Las Vegas and what about LaVoy Finigan who was shot dead by the FBI, Pete Santilli another reporter who was jailed for simply reporting the news a man you never talked about that I know of. You should be doing monthly updates if it's only 2 minutes until those men are free. This was such a big story when it happened and you gave it you utmost attention at the time, but I guess it's time to put a bow on it because it's simply old news. Shame on you for your lack of compassion so don't be too hard on Megyn Kelly you're getting just as big of a swelled ego. Remember every time you go to bed the Bundys are sleeping in a solitary jail cell with no access to the outside what so ever. Is Megyn really that important?
22 hours ago• [COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.541176)]
5 [/COLOR][COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.541176)][/COLOR][COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.541176)]
[/COLOR]
http://youtu.be/KceB_Iyy00o
https://youtu.be/KceB_Iyy00o
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Briana Bundy and Adrea Olson-Parker interviewed by 'Doc' from Texas, an hour long interview
http://youtu.be/VPj0wFuCc2o
https://youtu.be/VPj0wFuCc2o
'Doc' interview with Deb Jordan
http://youtu.be/R3RRi5FYG9s
https://youtu.be/R3RRi5FYG9s
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Retired Sheriff Richard Mack the "Stand for Freedom" rally in Las Vegas
http://youtu.be/v7xlW3ZN3-Q
https://youtu.be/v7xlW3ZN3-Q
