Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Harry Reid's 7 billion dollar broker's fees. This explains why Nevada Governor Sandoval turns a blind eye.
Welcome to DL&S Development
The BLM Land Grab racket in the West:
830-822-479
DL&S Development
ON APPEAL
Franklin v. Laughlin, et al. (pdf)
DOWNLOAD
Opposition Bried due 5-15-17 (pdf)
DOWNLOAD
6-27-17_My Response to Bar Counsel (pdf)
DOWNLOAD
Preface
No life, liberty or property shall be taken without the due process law. With liberty and justice for all.
Close the deal
In fact, Cliven Bundy has his "water rights" from the Nevada State Water Engineer to graze his cattle on the "Gold Butte NV Public Desert Land" under the "Homestead and Desert Land Acts of Congress".
However, in December 2016, Harry Reid persuaded Obama to order such 300,000 acres transferred from Public Lands, into a National Monument under the 1906 Antiquities Act, which prohibits cattle grazing.
Harry Reid, via skype conferencing, had already vetted Gloria Navarro on his deal with ENN Solar Energy from China to take Gold Butte, before he recommended Obama to confirm her as the NV chief fed judge. That is why Navarro's kangaroo court has denied all Bundy Ranch people bail for 16 months, and why she has tampered with the Jury's initial "Not Guilty" Verdict. She is hell-bent to convict the Bundys' in prison for life.
Now, Harry Reid has his $7 Billion broker fees with ENN both ways: The Bundys' remain in jail, and even if they ever get out, cattle grazing on a "fed monument" is illegal.
That is why Trump must reverse Obama's fed lock down, and return Gold Butte into its original Public Desert Land classification, so the local People can remain using Gold Butte NV to survive.
DOI Sec Zenke has a 'comment' period regarding this "265 MILLION" acres of Public Land & its Resources & Water Rights being locked-up from local use & development. The Sierra Clubs & other "paid political Groups" have many 1,000's of robo comments to Zenke, falsely pretending the local PEOPLE want the feds tyranny here:https://www.regulations.gov/docketBrowser?rpp=25&so=DESC...
A fed lock-up tyranny larger than the size of Texas: https://www.facebook.com/12050811462...0881618960524/
Under the "Homestead and Desert Land Entry Acts of Congress", Cliven Bundy had & still has his existing NV State Water Right "permits" to graze his cattle on Gold Butte NV.
Title 43 of the USC Annotated has always mandated that Water Rights are jurisdiction of the States, and the US only has interest & jurisdiction of "navigable water ways" that flow interstate as commerce. See also, 10th Amendment.The BLM has no jurisdiction into Cliven's NV State Water right permits, & no legal power to forfeit his Homestead Ranch.
INTRODUCTION
This is the true story of facts on Harry Reid and his son Rory's contracted mission to broker their tax subsidized deal, now at $7 Billion, with ENN Solar Energy corporation from China, to build their Solar Energy Plant in Clark County, Nevada.
The biography on Harry Reid's appointed political helpers in their Solar project that started in "Laughlin NV", and is now in "Gold Butte NV" are:
1. Harry Reid's appointed BLM Director Neil Kornze, who ordered 200 BLM mercenaries to invade the Bundy Ranch and impound their cattle off of "Gold Butte", two weeks after he was appointed...:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Kornze
2. Gloria Navarro, who Harry Reid vetted, recommended, nominated and had confirmed as chief NV fed judge; who DENIED defense motions to recuse herself on her conflicts of interest against the Bundy people; who DENIED defense motions for bail; and, who tampered with the Jury's initial "Not Guilty" Verdict...:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_Navarro
3. Harry Reid's son Rory, who was Chairman of the Clark County NV Commissioners; and who is still the lead attorney for ENN Solar from China: http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...n-nevada-deal/
4. Brian Sandoval, who in 2004 Harry Reid recommended,nominated and had confirmed as his NV fed judge; who in 2008 as judge omitted Franklins' property rights in Laughlin; who in 2009 resigned being fed judge to run for NV Governor; who in 2012 went to China on behalf of Harry Reid's ENN project
http://www.mohavedailynews.com/busin...html?mode=jqm;
who is the Governor who refused to call in his NV National Guards to protect the people in the BLM Standoff of 2014 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Sandoval
5. Who was US Senator Harry Reid in the 1990's decade?
While Reid was sending his fraudulent press releases weekly to the Laughlin NV Times (see below), to extort my Laughlin estate, he was also brokering "BLM Land Swaps" for Howard Hughes inc; Del Webb inc; and, Olypmic inc to acquire 1,000s of acres in the Vegas valley, in exchange for their worthless cabins in Lake Tahoe NV, that they all falsely claimed to be of "historic value".
Goldmine for Harry: Hughes built Summerlin in West Vegas, Del Webb built Anthem in Henderson; and, Olypmic built subdivisions in North Vegas, from their ghetto cabins swapped to BLM! Google that up!
Why I know? Because the BLM District Manager 'MIKE DWYER' also had my legally described estate in Laughlin, on his "BLM Land Swap" Memorandum , to swap all such land & resources, including mine.
Files coming soon.
Download
FROM THE BEGINNING
Read more:
https://fedlaws.xyz/
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
The Stand For Freedom with Roger Stone and others by InfoWars.
Who coached Roger Stone?
http://youtu.be/p1BxaMBHd9o
https://youtu.be/p1BxaMBHd9o
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Parker with update for afternoon court July 18
http://youtu.be/4D3KijW6SjE
https://youtu.be/4D3KijW6SjE
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Parked is doing a good job of reporting the corruption in this trial. Judge Navarro and the US Marshals must hate her guts for watching them so closely and exposing these miserable SOB's for what they are. It just seems insane to me that Navarro, the US Marshals, the BLM and all the other people working for the government get away with this. Doesn't seem to be anyone or anything though that will stop them from continuing on with this Kangaroo court and all the communist bullshit they're pulling. It makes me sick to keep hearing about what they're doing.
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tumbleweed
Andrea Parked is doing a good job of reporting the corruption in this trial. Judge Navarro and the US Marshals must hate her guts for watching them so closely and exposing these miserable SOB's for what they are. It just seems insane to me that Navarro, the US Marshals, the BLM and all the other people working for the government get away with this. Doesn't seem to be anyone or anything though that will stop them from continuing on with this Kangaroo court and all the communist bullshit they're pulling. It makes me sick to keep hearing about what they're doing.
I understand what you are feeling because I feel the same myself. I get upset and frustrated watching all this take place. I sent a certified letter to Trump, copies to Zinkie, Sessions, Inspector General, Criminal Division of DOJ, Nevada Attorny General, both Nevada Senators, and the Nevada District 4 Congressman knowing full well nothing would come of it.
I wrote a letter to the editor at Las Vegas Review-Journal knowing it wouldn't be published because it is too controversial.
with the levels of corruption in Washington D.C. and our state governments there is no solution.
My brother commented last night:
Quote:
If you are writing letters consider writing to Jeff session doj asking or suggest doj needs to review Hage vs USA how Hage won in the us Court of claims for the tune of 14 mill only to have the Feds repeal down to nothing and winning in Reno federal district court to have it turned over by the 9th curcit saying the judge was prejudiced against fed employees and also that it seems that lead attorney mr bartell has a personal vendetta against the Hage's is he working under the radar and who does he answer to
This is all the result of Harry Reid, Obama and Obamas DOJ. Obama, with Harry Reids help packed the courts and the DOJ full of his communist supporters.
Harry Reid owns the judges, the prosecutors law enforcement in Clark County and Governor Sandoval. He controls Nevadas Congress representatives, and probably Senator Katerine Cortez-Masto.
Nevada’s godfather still calling the shots for state Democrats
https://www.reviewjournal.com/wp-con..._web1_reid.jpgHarry Reid. Bizuayehu Tesfaye/Las Vegas Review-Journal @bizutesfaye
Just when we thought Harry Reid was finally gone, he’s back and now has three votes — Jacky Rosen, Dina Titus and Ruben Kihuen. Kudos to Roger Maly for his July 7 letter criticizing Nevada’s congressional Democrats for opposing Kate’s Law. Does it make any sense that they would vote in favor of illegal felons over the safety of the law-abiding, working, taxpaying, American citizens they supposedly represent?
Sadly, it appears that GOP Sen. Dean Heller is going that way, as well, on health care and we may have to find some true American to replace him next.
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Judge and Prosecutors Spinning Social Media Andrea Olson-Parker July 19
http://youtu.be/AKdlW3ohF8k
https://youtu.be/AKdlW3ohF8k
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Parker with the end of day trial report July 19
http://youtu.be/BgSDAPsxAPs
https://youtu.be/BgSDAPsxAPs
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
MrsB Stacy analyzes the judges reasons for allowing the jury to question the witnesses and mkes her predictions
.
She also ask viewers to post their thoughts on the judges reasons for this.
http://youtu.be/cs_IEl-CjnI
https://youtu.be/cs_IEl-CjnI
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Thomas Mitchel writes a blog that is puplished in several rural Nevada Newspapers. This July 10 article is about Judge Gloria Navarro's limiting the defendants evidence for fear of jury nullification.
Federal judge won’t allow Bundy defendants to present evidence that might’ve resulted in hung jury
Jul11by Thomas Mitchell
railroad — to convict with undue haste and by means of false charges or insufficient evidence; to push through hastily or without due consideration
Before jury selection began Monday in the retrial of four defendants in the 2014 Bunkerville standoff at the Bundy ranch federal Judge Gloria Navarro granted a prosecution motion to bar presentation of evidence “supporting jury nullification.”
In April, in the first of three scheduled trials for the Bunkerville defendants — charged with obstruction of justice, conspiracy, extortion, assault and impeding federal officers — ended in a mistrial. The jury found only two of six people on trial guilty of some charges but deadlocked on the others. The jurors agreed to convict on only 10 of the 60 charges brought. None of the conspiracy charges stuck.
The standoff occurred after armed Bureau of Land Management agents attempted to roundup Bundy’s cattle after he had refused for 20 years to pay grazing fees in the Gold Butte area. The BLM said he owed $1 million in fees and penalties. Faced with armed protesters the BLM agents eventually released the cattle and left to avoid potential bloodshed.
Two more trials are pending, with Cliven Bundy and his four sons scheduled to be the last. Most defendants have been jailed without bail for a year and half.
Two of Bundy’s sons, who had been arrested on separate but similar charges of illegally occupying an Oregon wildlife refuge to protest the jailing of father and son ranchers under a terrrorism law for letting fires get out of control and burn a few acres of federal public land, were acquitted of those charges this past fall by a jury, along with their co-defendants.
In mid-June the prosecution filed a motion asking the judge to bar the jurors in the current trial in Las Vegas from ever even hearing certain so-called state of mind arguments — arguments that the defendants felt justified to show up and protest the confiscation of Bundy’s cattle because of abusive use of force by law enforcement and that they were simply exercising their First and Second Amendment rights.
Navarro noted in her ruling Monday that in the first trial she had rejected the Bill Rights arguments and that would stand for this trial. “The Court also rejected Defendants’ proposed instructions on the First and Second Amendment because they are not legally cognizable defenses, or in other words, the law does not recognize these Amendments as legal defenses to the crimes charged.” (navarro ruling)
A rather convoluted argument, but what else would one expect from those who see their jobs as enforcing laws rather than upholding rights.
The Bill of Rights were added to the Constitution in order to spell out certain inalienable rights that Congress must not trample with its laws.
First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech … or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Second Amendment: “… the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
But those are not defenses against laws prohibiting behavior that causes federal officers to feel threatened.
Navarro quoted from a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on the topic of jury nullification:
Jury nullification occurs when a jury acquits a defendant, even though the government proved guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. … [J]uries do not have a right to nullify, and courts have no corresponding duty to ensure that juries are able to exercise this power, such as by giving jury instructions on the power to nullify. … On the contrary, “courts have the duty to forestall or prevent [nullification], whether by firm instruction or admonition or . . . dismissal of an offending juror,” because “it is the duty of juries in criminal cases to take the law from the court, and apply that law to the facts as they find them to be from the evidence.”
Juries are just rubber-stamps.
Navarro concluded, “The Court will not permit argument, evidence, or testimony regarding Defendants’ beliefs about the constitution as such beliefs are irrelevant and a possible jury nullification attempt.”
The concept of jury nullification dates to colonial days and is widely taught in journalism schools, because it involved printer John Peter Zinger who was indicted for criminal libel against the colonial governor and tried in 1735. His attorney Andrew Hamilton offered as a defense that what was printed was true, even though under the law truth was not a defense but rather a confirmation of guilt.
The judge at Zenger’s trial ruled that Hamilton could not present evidence of the truth of the printed statements. “The law is clear that you cannot justify a libel,” the judge said. “The jury may find that Zenger printed and published those papers, and leave to the Court to judge whether they are libelous.”
Here is a portion of Hamilton’s closing argument:It is natural, it is a privilege, I will go farther, it is a right, which all free men claim, that they are entitled to complain when they are hurt. They have a right publicly to remonstrate against the abuses of power in the strongest terms, to put their neighbors upon their guard against the craft or open violence of men in authority, and to assert with courage the sense they have of the blessings of liberty, the value they put upon
it, and their resolution at all hazards to preserve it as one of the greatest blessings heaven can bestow. …
The loss of liberty, to a generous mind, is worse than death. And yet we know that there have been those in all ages who for the sake of preferment, or some imaginary honor, have freely lent a helping hand to oppress, nay to destroy, their country. … This is what every man who values freedom ought to consider. He should act by judgment and not by affection or self-interest; for where those prevail, no ties of either country or kindred are regarded; as upon the other hand, the man who loves his country prefers its liberty to all other considerations, well knowing that without liberty life is a misery. …
But to conclude: The question before the Court and you, Gentlemen of the jury, is not of small or private concern. It is not the cause of one poor printer, nor of New York alone, which you are now trying. No! It may in its consequence affect every free man that lives under a British government on the main of America. It is the best cause. It is the cause of liberty. And I make no doubt but your upright conduct this day will not only entitle you to the love and esteem of your fellow citizens, but every man who prefers freedom to a life of slavery will bless and honor you as men who have baffled the attempt of tyranny, and by an impartial and uncorrupt verdict have laid a noble foundation for securing to ourselves, our posterity, and our neighbors, that to which nature and the laws of our country have given us a right to liberty of both exposing and opposing arbitrary power (in these parts of the world at least) by speaking and writing truth.
