-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
Civil is Not Civilian - A Short Explanation of Corporate Feudalism
Many people make references to the "civil government" without realizing that the "civil government" is not the civilian government.
"Civil" refers to the Municipal Government --- and ultimately, to the Municipal Government of Rome, "The" City. Rome is unique in the history of the world and its "Empire of the City" has spanned the centuries in a single leap from 700 BC to the present virtually unaltered in form. It is still an all-embracing Municipal Government, and this is the form of the "Holy Roman Empire".
Voltaire once quipped that the Holy Roman Empire was "not holy, not Roman, and not an empire" --- and in part, I wholeheartedly agree; but in another sense, it very much is an empire that has used the Church as a storefront, used Rome as a base of operations, and which now encircles the globe in a python-like grasp of interlocking trust directorates and commercial corporate interests.
When our country was founded a little over two hundred years ago, commercial corporations were somewhat an oddity. Only a few industries employed commercial corporations, notably shipping and trading companies, banks, fledgling insurance companies, trade guilds (unions), and government-to-government operations.
There were no stock exchanges. No stock market. No publicly traded companies. No SEC. No DTTC. No Corporations Company of America. No massive insurance funds. No trading in bonds, except sovereign bonds between governments. The explosive growth in all these areas and the development of all these corporate institutions was fueled by the use of "commercial paper" as a money substitute.
And that, in turn, was fueled by the spread of the Municipal Government of Rome and the standardization of shipping lanes, postal services, trade policies, post roads, communications systems, expansion of the use of insurance and bottomry bonds in shipping, the advent of pension programs, the proliferation of commercial patent processes under government protection, international copyrights and trademarks also protected by governments, and what has developed into the modern Uniform Commercial Code.
In a relatively short period of time, "commerce" has exploded onto the world stage and guided by the single-minded demand for profit, has fueled a new brand of Corporate Feudalism, clearly visible in the economic polarizations that commerce has created.
Along with the explosive growth created by institutionalized gambling (insurance, commodities markets, stock exchanges, investment and brokerage houses, investment banking, bond markets, etc. are all forms of institutionalized and increasingly deregulated gambling) came another "push" to bulk up the commercial markets --- the securitization, bonding, and enfranchisement of practically everyone and everything on earth.
Commerce, by definition, is business conducted between two incorporated entities, and incorporated entities have to be sponsored and chartered by governments or enfranchised by other corporations that are sponsored by governments. All incorporated entities are "unnatural" and consist of total legal fictions, businesses created by businesses, corporations created by other corporations, and totally cut off from the realm of physical reality.
To funnel this explosive growth and keep the momentum going and to benefit themselves, the promoters of the whole realm of commerce --- the Municipal Government of Rome operated by the Roman Pontiffs -- approved the securitization, bonding, and enfranchisement of living people, and thereby reduced men to things --- commodities to be traded, corporations to be moved about and controlled and held to account like any other corporations, little bricks in the vast edifice that the Civil Municipal Government has been building.
The big problem with the Civil Government is that it is all built on lies of one kind or another, and on enslavement of Mankind by networks of bullies and thieves in nice suits--- which leads inexorably back to the evils of Robber Barons and racketeering "for the king" however "the king" may be defined, and to a brutal new kind of industrialized and computerized Feudalism in which we all serve corporations instead of corporations serving us.
And that is, in part, what we come to address as we gather ourselves together in Faith Communities and Patriot Groups and State Assemblies and wherever living men gather to contemplate the circumstance.
It is grossly unlawful to securitize living men as commodities and also unlawful to subject them to bondage, yet the perpetrators have sought to get around this by legal chicanery ---kidnapping living men from their natural estate on the land and soil of their respective countries and shanghai-ing us on paper first into the international Jurisdiction of the Sea, and next into the foreign realm of the international Jurisdiction of the Air--- and unlawfully converting our names into the names of corporations.
This is a crime known as "personage" and it has been rampantly practiced by the governments of the western world since the 1940's, right under the noses of the Popes and Prelates, the Justices and Politicians, the Generals and the Admirals responsible for protecting us.
We can only conclude that at least a very substantial part of all that comprises world government is criminal in nature, and that the institutional and legal and Public Law safeguards have failed from the Pope, who is supposed to liquidate corporations caught in unlawful activities, on down to local "law enforcement" agencies which have failed to enforce the Public Law.
Thus, again, the only strength is in public awareness and public action to put things back in order before a few madmen like George Soros create Hell on Earth instead of what is meant to be -- a Heaven on Earth.
Millions of Americans have to be awakened to the clear and present danger that our own runaway military and federal civilian subcontractors have presented to us and to the rest of the world.
Everyone needs to reclaim their own good name and estate as living people and in this country, that means to "return" from any presumption of "US Citizenship" and also placing one's political status firmly on the Public Records of these private corporations as being American State Nationals and/or American State Citizens.
All this corporate hanky-panky needs to evaporate like mist on a summer morning. Let this outrageous criminality be nullified as the fraud that it is, and let all the assets be returned free and clear -- as the actual Public Law requires.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
How To Use Your Paperwork
The best paperwork in the world won't help you if you don't know how to use it, so yes, you need to think about it beyond just recording it.
Reason and Logic:
The reason you create and develop the paperwork in the first place, is to use it as superior evidence of who you are (a Lawful Person) and the capacity in which you are acting (peaceful American State civilian).
The British Territorial Army (aka United States Raj) has deemed it expedient to misidentify everyone as enemy combatants until proven otherwise.
The two sides in this ugly 150 year-old fantasy "war" are the British Territorial Government operating a Territorial State of State, like the State of Wisconsin, and the Municipal United States Government operating a Municipal State of State like the STATE OF WISCONSIN.
So the Army has their Undeclared Foreign Agents (doctors and nurses illegally conscripted under the old Federal Title 37 as "Uniformed Officers") at the hospitals identify all newborn babies as "lost on the battlefield" and then they "presume" the newborns are wards of their Territorial States of States, and then the cretins ship your data off to have you arbitrarily defined and registered as a Municipal "Enemy Combatant" so that the Army can come back in and pillage your ESTATE, etc., under the guise of you being an "Enemy" and all this absolute crap is being promoted from both sides of this farce.
So, they have "evidence" that you are both a Territorial Pauper, a Ward of the State of State, and more "evidence" that you are a Municipal Citizen, a "US CITIZEN", which makes you a "presumed" Enemy Combatant, already a criminal under their unauthorized 14th Amendment and a slave because you are a criminal.
Oh, my, haven't they all been busy making up lies and processes to defraud and rob the people they are supposed to be protecting and serving?
So now that you know what these vermin have been perpetuating against innocent people, and how they have been doing it, isn't it time to answer back?
Yes, so, they have issued a "Birth Certificate" in your NAME, and this serves as evidence for them, but it can also serve as evidence for you. It's a two-edged sword.
You are going to get a few Certified Copies of the BC and put them in a file. Along with that, you are going to obtain two affirmed and Notarized Witness Testimonies from people having first hand knowledge of who you are (friends, family, classmates, long time employers, co-workers, etc.) and where and when you were born, clearly identifying a picture of you as "the" one who was born at such and such a time and place to such parents.
This establishes who you are and connects your physical body to the name, so that your living Lawful Personhood can be established. Notice that you have a birthday, but the THING they created when they registered you as property belonging to their corporation has a birth date, which is the file date when this bogus PERSON was created. Two separate days, two separate persons.
The additional pieces of paper --- the Deed of Re-Conveyance officially removing your Trade Name from the international jurisdiction of the sea and placing it back on the Land, the revocation of all prior Powers of Attorney, the Expatriation from Territorial and Municipal Citizenship, the Certificate of Assumed Name(s) -- all serve to transport you back to Lawful Person status and put you firmly back on the land and soil of an American State and seize control of your identity and your assets.
All this recorded evidence now stands against their evidence and is superior, because yours is more recent, more credible, and more complete.
So now you've got a problem. Your neighbor is suing you for an easement. The inquisitors are harassing you over "federal" income taxes and you don't have any federal income. Your wife wants a divorce. Some goon from social services is trying to steal your kids for the sex market.
What do you do?
All of these courts--- absolutely all of them--- are nothing but For Hire entities having no official office or capacity related to American State Citizens.
As American State Citizens and Lawful Persons you are outside their jurisdiction by about a thousand miles 90% of the time--- but you have to know that and you have to bring that forward.
Considerations:
First, you can often avoid the conventional court schtick altogether. Go to court, stand up without entering the Bar, (the railing between the onlookers and the court per se) when your name is called and say, "I am visiting the Court as a Lawful Person to request arbitration." If this provokes a response from the Judge, simply shrug and say, "I have been misaddressed by the Prosecuting Attorney, your Honor, and request arbitration."
Your chances of presenting your ownership interests according to a normal course of business are much better in arbitration and if you have done your homework, your chances of getting a private arbitration service to agree with your position --- if you can explain it adequately (which is covered below) --- are also much better. But be aware that arbitration is not for criminal matters and that results are generally speaking binding and non-appealable for both parties.
The words "Lawful Person" "visiting" and "misaddressed" are all red flags for the Judge, who is most likely going to expedite your speedy exit from his courtroom.
Second line of defense, when faced with criminal charges or unavoidable confrontation in their arena:
1. The Judge is not your enemy. The Judge is the Referee. He makes his money off of judgements so he will be delighted if he can nail someone and he really doesn't care who.
2. The ones you want to torpedo and/or discourage are the Prosecuting Attorney and the District Attorney who is responsible for the Prosecuting Attorney.
3. All these guys are racketeering on our shores and really don't have a leg to stand on, so they are probably more afraid of you than you are of them.
4. You can prepare your demonstration in advance and have your evidence ready to go, so get yourself several copies of everything, keep one Master File Copy, put one additional copy of your Master File somewhere else safe, and the rest of your copies are then available for presentations.
5. You don't need to present an Authenticated Birth Certificate and you never need to record a Birth Certificate. You just need a Certified BC to present to the District Attorney. Along with that, you bring either original or recorded copies of a set of two Witness Testimonies done before a Public Notary under penalty of perjury and from without the United States affirming that you (photo embedded in the page) are to their first-hand knowledge "the" man or woman whose actual physical birth event occurred in Flat Rump, Texas, July 4, 1946-- or whatever your details are, of course.
6. These three documents establish who you are, where and when you were born, and your physical presence leaves no doubt that you are alive.
7. You set the DA or Assistant DA down and look them in the eye and you plunk that BC down on the desk and you say, "I am not presenting this for any purpose of identification." That is lawyer-speak for "I am here for payment and exemption." On top of the BC, you lay down the Witness Testimonies.
8. Then you say, "I am a Lawful Person, an American State Citizen, and I have been misaddressed by Peter K. Lipsalot, Esquire, an attorney in your Territorial State of State District. He has sent unsolicited mail misaddressed to a foreign PERSON to me." You plunk down whatever summons or other paperwork has been sent to you or delivered to your door.
9. Then you say, "I want this clearly understood. I am a Lawful Person standing on the land and soil jurisdiction of this State. I am not a resident of any State of State. I also want it understood that I have not volunteered for any Territorial or Municipal citizenship or duty and that I claim my exemption from such duty effective with my actual birthday. I have placed Notice in your Public Record and I fail to see why Peter K. Lipsalot, Esquire, is being allowed to misaddress me in this manner."
10. "Any unauthorized Municipal PERSON represented by this NAME has been returned to the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary and his Successors have been named the Fiduciaries responsible for this ACCOUNT. Now, I have not made any charges against this ACCOUNT and I have not authorized Mr. Peter K. Lipsalot, Esquire, to make any charges, either. Now, surely, this is all a Big Mistake and Misunderstanding."
Plunk down a black and white copy of your Form 56 and mailing receipts.
11. "Because as there is light in the day, I am not dead in any sense of the word. Now, I know, that you are operating under the 1934 Amendment to the Trading With the Enemy Act and I know all about the Lieber Code and I know and can prove for a fact that I am a peaceful Third Party non-combatant who is owed the Law of Peace and I refer you, Sir, to AR27-1-161 so that you can see in military terms exactly what kind of law and exemptions and reparations I am owed. And I see no evidence of any valid contract, no authority to address me, and no jurisdiction of the court related to me.
I want this whole matter cleared up and cleaned out, and I wish for my Lawful Person and all my assets to be fully exonerated and exempted -- with prejudice foreclosing any further contact or court action presuming against me and my material interests. If Peter K. Lipsalot wishes to continue his attack after you have explained that I am a Lawful Person, not a Legal Person, he can take it up with the Secretary of the Treasury. "
12. Be just as nice as the flowers in May, folks. You can afford to be. Put a business card with an "in care of" address for the return of the paperwork, and just walk out. They have a performance obligation to you six miles wide. Make them perform.
Now all this takes chutzpah, initiative, pre-planning, and practice. You can't just sit around and think that, oh, I know who I am.... and think that everyone else is just going to know who you are.
That DA's job is to fleece any and all "enemy combatants" in a non-existent 150 year-old "war" clean.
He's going to see you as an "enemy combatant" if you leave him an inch and a phooftee in the wind.
Once you really start thinking about this, you will realize that there isn't much out there proving that you even exist, much less any record of your political status and capacity--- and what there is, is wrong. That makes you a sitting duck for these racketeers.
Our own dear Generals and Admirals of the US Navy set it up this way with malice aforethought while they were playing with their toys and drawing their pay.
That factoid along with a clear view of what these renegade employees have been doing, should jerk you awake and get you up on your feet. The sooner the better.
Once you have your own records established and polished and you have your Superior Evidence nailed down, join your State Assembly.
I thought that starting with the State Jural Assemblies would be a good idea and it still is, but only if you are setting up an actual State Jural Assembly, not a "State of State" Jural Assembly nor any kind of incorporated "STATE" Jural Assembly, which doesn't get the job done and doesn't put an end to this mischief.
Been there, done that, and too many times. This time, we are going to settle this hash and if the Brits or the Popes or anyone does anything at all to impede us or harm us, they are going to be fully liable and exposed for all the world to see.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
10 hrs ·
For All The Jural Assemblies - 42 The United States Raj
Many of the people reading this can remember film clips of Mahatma Gandhi and news reels being shown of the massive population-wide but largely peaceful demonstrations taking place in India in the late 1940's against the British "Raj".
The whole point was to free the Indian Subcontinent from British rule and oppression that began in the 1860's and to restore self-government to India.
How ironic.
The British did the same thing here and at the same time, the 1860's, but they could use deceit to get away with it here, because they had many Tory sycophants ready to willingly subject themselves to the Queen, and even more clueless wonders ready to do anything for a paycheck, and most of all because they could pass themselves and their flunkies off as "Americans" --its a lot harder for a Brit to pretend to be a native of Calcutta than it is to say he's from Maine.
The historical evidence of a worldwide coup in the 1860's that secretly restored a British military hegemony in America and which accomplished the same basic aims using the same basic means in Australia, Canada, India, South Africa, Scotland, Ireland, and England herself, is incontrovertible and it all stems from Benjamin Disraeli, Queen Victoria, and their completely cynical and non-disclosed contractual "enfranchisement" of the working classes in all these countries.
The end result is the equivalent military "Raj" ruling the United States has endured for over 70 years longer than the Raj in India, with most people being none the wiser.
Until now.
The British Territorial Military Government usurped upon us beginning in 1863, at the about the same time (a little after in some steps and a little earlier for others) that Disraeli and Queen Victoria were enfranchising British workers and taking over India. They basically enslaved and "hypothecated debt" against all of us to raise the capital to enslave India.
So as we were sitting there as good little British and American and Aussie and Canadian Schoolchildren being fed propaganda daily, and as the world was cheering the more or less peaceful separation of Pakistan from India and then cheering the people of India for facing down the pitiless Raj and showing them up for the brutal thugs they really were ---- little did we know, that our very own beloved "US Military" was cut from nearly the same cloth.
Perhaps the native Christian ethics and the honesty of the Heartland served to somewhat moderate the brutality of the so-called "American Military" which hasn't been "American" since the 1860's, but we made up with clueless stupidity and brute strength what we lacked in guile and sophistication.
Through two World Wars we served our British Masters to our own detriment and this is the thanks that we have received --- the complete undermining of our Government, our school system, our monetary system, our morals, and our property rights. And now we stand threatened by our own employees.
Both Obama and Trump have armed the Alphabet Soup Civilian Agencies belonging to the Holy Roman Empire Municipal Government to the teeth in preparation for the precipitation of another Civil War that the Benelux and French banking interests plan to unleash against the British-led Banksters on our soil.
Both sides are as nasty and dirty as two Nazis in a sun bed.
We are supposed to be sucked into this planned conflagration which is meant to blossom into yet another "final" World War against "Evil", but the fact is that both sides are evil and there are no winners.
Before it comes to that, let's expose the situation and decline to host any such war on our soil. It was bad enough during the similar mercenary conflict known as the Civil War. No repeats welcome nor necessary.
We will paddle our own boats, reconstruct our own Federal States of States, and provide our own services. Thank you, very much.
It is this Third Path that beckons us, to restore our country and our lawful and actual Government by peaceful means, and which also calls on the conscience of the whole world, so that these venal men who have enslaved and murdered our people, cheated and defrauded entire generations, and misrepresented America to the rest of the world, can be seen for what they are and what they do. Let the fruits be exposed and speak for themselves.
As Jural Assembly members and lawful American State Citizens, it is long overdue for us to take our employees in hand and put an end to the so-called Reconstruction, and also put an end to the self-serving lie that our Government is in any kind of "abeyance", and finally, to totally reform the United States Raj.
For the last several months we have been inundated with commercial corporations operating on our shores under deceitful, duplicitous names designed to fool people regarding their true identities, natures, and intents.
We have "The Republic of the United States of America" and "The Republic for the united States of America" and "The Republic" and "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA---(INC.) and "The United States, Inc." and you name it, we have it.
There's a virtual smorgasbord of dishonest commercial corporations offering their services and pretending to be us, but the fact remains that our actual Government operates under exactly three Proper Names styled like this:
(1) The United States
(2) The United States of America
(3) the States of America
And nothing else.
Similarly, there is a plague of other lesser franchise corporations trying to pull the same wool over our States of the Union and to impersonate them for the purpose of securing control of our assets for their benefit and abuse.
We've had "ALABAMA" and "AL" and "ALASKA" and "AK" and all sorts of variations on these themes and what it all comes down to is this --- they are fakes. Not our States. Not our People.
Whatever else they are, they are not us, and many of them have unsavory associations with the same fraud artists and organizations which have defrauded and abused us for decades, including The United States Raj.
Forewarned is forewarned. Everyone can now see what is going on and the urgency with which a restoration of our lawful Government of, for, and by the People of this country is sought. Let every good man and woman from every corner of the globe do all that they can in support, by thought, by word, by prayer, and by deed.
Both the British Hegemony and the Holy Roman Empire Atrocities have had their day. It's time for different answers and we must find them.
Nobody can do for us what we need to do for ourselves, which is simply to update and restore our own government under our own power, acting in our own proper capacity as Lawful Persons and as American State Citizens---but just as we cheered the People of India three-quarters of a century ago, the public opinion of the world must be turned against the British Interlopers and the HRE with equal force.
We have experienced first-hand their guile and mistreatment for 150 years. It's time for America and the rest of the world to be truly free and assembling our States is a first and most important requirement.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·
Baseball or Football?
Everyone in America knows about baseball and football. We all know that they are different games, different balls, different playing fields, different players, different scoring systems.
About all they have in common is that they are team sports.
So this whole argument over "U.S. Citizens" versus "American State Citizens" should be easy to grasp.
If you want to organize an actual American State of the Union, like Texas, or Maine, or California, you have to act as an American State Citizen. Play football.
If you want to organize some other kind of "STATE" as a franchise organization belonging to a commercial corporation, it doesn't matter what your political status is. Play baseball.
American State Citizens are the only ones with the right, authority, and responsibility to organize the actual States.
Anybody on Earth including U.S. Citizens and Foreign Nationals can organize a corporation calling itself "MICHIGAN"--- if they are a tadbit dishonest and the rest of us don't catch on.
I already showed you all the Registered Agents for these fake "state" corporations and their parent organizations registered in Nevada.
There is also the past history of commercial corporations pulling exactly this same schtick on us -- "The United States of America, Incorporated" (Scottish, 1868) and "the" United States of America, Incorporated (Delaware, 1925) and all the "States of States" listed on Dunn and Bradstreet.
So, if that is the kind of "State" you want to organize, go right on ahead and follow the lead of Destry Payne and the Michigan General Jural Assembly and continue to act as "US Citizens".
You can play baseball if you want to.
Just don't try to tell me that you're playing football instead.
I and my friends are serious about operating in the correct capacity and assembling the actual land jurisdiction States to take care of business that has been left hanging since 1865.
In choosing to do this, we are aware of the legal obstacles that have been placed in our way and we have taken appropriate action to remove those obstacles. That means doing our paperwork and educating ourselves to operate as Lawful Persons.
There will soon be a streamlined system to accomplish the paperwork, a State by State Recording Office, and a weekly teleconference for The American States Assembly. I won't be moderating, but I will come on every week and answer questions directly.
Lots of people are coming to me upset by the mud-slinging coming from various "news" sources --- like loony accusations that I, a Great-Grandma, from Big Lake, Alaska, am a CIA Operative.
I don't have to think too hard to know there's no proof of that Whopper.
It did cause me to blow coffee through my nose and gasp a little, but then, I guess if you are irresponsible enough, you can say anything about anybody.
Others are accusing me of selling a "Cabal version" of work they did.
If there are similarities between information in my articles and work done by the MGJA, it's because there is one history of Assemblies in America and the work of assembling an actual State is similar to assembling a STATE, though the end results are profoundly different.
Maybe my basic analogy should be between two other games -- chess and checkers -- that share the same game board.
You can use pretty much the same processes to build an unincorporated State (my aim) as you would use to build an incorporated commercial franchise STATE, but the results are profoundly different in terms of powers and jurisdictions.
Therein lies the rub. That's how even I was deceived into supporting what MGJA was doing for so long.
But, unavoidably, if you build an organization of US Citizens, you end up with a STATE operating in sea or air jurisdictions, and if you build using American State Citizens you end up with a land jurisdiction State.
The same parties accuse me of "profit motives". Oh, yeah, I am getting rich on this. That's why I have to beg my Readers for donations for The Living Law Firm almost every month.
If it's not an earthquake, it's three transmissions falling out of three different cars, all within the week. It really helps our bottom line that 85% of the people we help are already broke themselves from fighting tax agencies and the foreclosure mill and the rest of the British privateering operations that are dry-docked on our shores.
Anyone with a brain --- my desired audience --- will realize that if making money was my goal, a paperback for $12.95 -- which barely pays for the paper and ink to print it, wouldn't be the way to do it.
They'd also realize that I already published the material for free and left it standing on my website so that anyone too poor to buy a paperback book has constant access to the information, even if its less convenient.
If making money were the point, I'd be selling "Freedom Packages" for thousands of dollars and acting as a consultant for commercial corporations. Or just sitting back on the bleachers and enjoying my own retirement instead of spending it all on research and paperwork and correspondence, etc., etc., etc., and support for our Team.
I guess the idea that there are some people out here who are just plain old Americans -- and proud of it -- doesn't hit home with these folks.
Just use the Rule of Thumb: the Liars among us always accuse others of what they are guilty of themselves. Maybe they are CIA Agents or DOD or UN, more likely. Maybe they have little kitties stashed away for trips to Morocco? Maybe Destry cleans up real good and looks like James Bond when he is on vacation?
No doubt the real "Operatives" tell jokes about how gullible we are.
And no doubt it is up to us to know what game we are playing.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
About Social Security....
Social Security is a supposed to be a pension plan program for Federal Civil Service Employees.
Let's de-construct that:
"Federal" equals "Foreign Persons" because while they are employed in the Federal Civil Service, our people work as foreign persons known as either "United States Citizens" or "Citizens of the United States".
"Civil" means "City" as in "Rome" as in "Municipal City-State Government" as in "Washington, DC Municipality" etc., so not military employees, not Territorial employees --- we are talking about "Citizens of the United States".
"Service Employees" means "inhabitants" who are "residents" merely sojourning here on our soil temporarily for the purpose of providing us and our States of the Union with specific governmental services.
Okay--- so, Social Security is supposed to be a pension program for "Foreign Persons employed by the Municipal United States Government to provide services under contract to our States of the Union". Got that?
I bet that nobody ever told you that in your lifetime.
I bet that like millions of other trusting Americans, you were told that it was a government (as in your government) mandate and that you HAD TO sign up for a "Social Security Number" before you could get a job.
They just conveniently "forgot" to tell you that that only applied if you were seeking a job as a Federal Civil Service Employee.
Now millions of American Seniors are waking up and noticing that their monthly pension payments which they earned the hard way are being further misrepresented as "benefits" and as "entitlements" --- also known as "welfare".
So what's the Situation Report?
You have been conscripted by deceit exercised under color of law into a pension program that you were (most likely, unless you actually worked for the Post Office or Federal Agency) never eligible for in the first place, you and your employers were cheated out of 10-15% of your gross earnings throughout your working life, and now the Bilkers responsible for all this are folding their tents and looking for ways to avoid paying you anything at all.
After all, "benefits" and "entitlements" are gifts, not obligations.
Millions of American Seniors are being set up to take the final fall for this whole criminal enterprise, and those who are ultimately responsible, the Pope and the Cardinals in Rome, and the members of the "Municipal Congress" in Washington, DC are busy surviving their sex scandals and ignoring the fact that their own dear Hillary sold 20% of our Uranium to the Russians.
Now that is Russian Collusion, in case anyone wants to know.
Having finally realized that you have been defrauded, if you go to the "Social Security Administration" --- another private Municipal Corporation --- and explain the situation, they will tell you that by law (their private corporation by-laws) that you are not allowed to quit their program.
Well, again, that's kinda sorta a half-truth like the lie that got you involved in their shell game in the first place. That's true if you are one of their Retirees and one of their U.S. Citizens, but if you weren't actually a Federal Civil Service Employee, and are not
"voluntarily adopting" foreign "US Citizenship" status, there is no such "law" applicable to you. You are owed either: (1) immediate settlement of your account, or (2) the full range of services and payments available at the time of your retirement and/or withdrawal from the program.
This is another reason that they want to keep everyone in the "US Citizen" box. Once you reclaim your birthright political status as either an "American State National" or an "American State Citizen" then their foreign corporation's statutory "laws" don't mean diddly squat to you. And the fraud they committed against you becomes actionable under international law, too.
Does anyone besides me feel the "Mother of All International Class Action Suits" coming on?
It's not that we would want to deprive any actual Federal Employee of a well-earned retirement and medical services, but on the other hand, we have been culled and gullied out of large sums of money that have been essentially stolen and mishandled, used as investment funds for the profit of foreign corporations and diddled away to buy votes.
We have no reason to stand on the sidelines and condone that, do we?
And we are not owed "benefits" ---we are owed the return of our money and credit, plus interest.
Yet another reason to revoke Voter Registrations and "elections" to pay the IRS, and to go after the Social Security Administration and the members of the so-called Municipal Congress delegations, and most of all, the Roman Catholic Church, which is responsible, together with the Democratic Political Party, for all these venal, self-interested lies and misrepresentations to American workers and retirees.
Yet another reason, too, to reclaim your stolen birthright political status as an American State National and to serve your actual State of the Union as an American State Citizen. They've been mistaking their "law" for our Public Law for a long time. It's time that we addressed these foreign corporations and either (1) shut them down and nationalize them as criminal organizations involved in fraud and racketeering or (2) fully label and expose exactly what they are doing and made it clear that Americans are not obligated to have Social Security Numbers and are not obligated to tax themselves and are not eligible for the Social Security Program if they are not Federal Civil Service Employees.
Get your political status sorted out and properly recorded, so that these corporations cannot mis-characterize you as a "US Citizen" any more, cancel your Voter Registrations, and then join us in cleaning up this Mess.
You are not Beggars chasing after bankrupt commercial shell corporations, you are American State Citizens who have suffered fraud and Breach of Trust at the hands of the Popes and the Queen and the Democratic Party and the Municipal United States Congress--- all of whom are 100% fully and commercially liable both for the past and for their current failure to correct.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
The Philippines, MacArthur, and Our Gold - International Notice
This will be a very brief foray into a very complex subject, but it will suffice to clue you into the vastness and point sources of the corruption we wrestle with today.
As my Readers know, following the Civil War, the British Monarch pulled a little Cuckoo Bird fraud trick on us, and substituted their Territorial States of States for our own American-chartered Federal States of States.
That left the Federal Branch of our intended Federal Government incapacitated pending "Reconstruction".
Once the Territorial States of States were in place, it was easy for people to totally miss or overlook the difference between "The State of Maine" that existed before the conflict and "the" State of Maine that came into being after the conflict.
The British Monarchs settled down to quietly reign over this new kingdom built on fraud and deceit, and the American People thought that the "Reconstruction" was finished instead of left dangling and still waiting for their States to complete.
To pull this fraud off, the Scottish Government chartered a new commercial corporation called "The United States of America"---Incorporated, in 1868.
By 1898, they had run up unimaginable amounts of debt against us and against our States of the Union and were running scared and looking for ways to finish bilking us and run.
So they bought the Philippine Islands --- the actual land mass of the Islands -- with our money, and took over the Philippines, literally. This happened in 1898 and we have the proof.
They then began building bunkers and shipping our gold to the Philippines, where it remained in storage while the "government' --- that is, the Scottish commercial corporation went bankrupt in 1907.
The next interloper, "the" United States of America, Inc., sponsored by the Roman Catholic Church as a "religious non-profit" in 1925, had a Hit and Run program of its own, designed to collapse the American Stock Market, which happened in 1929 and which left us to sort out the bankruptcy of this second Usurper in 1933.
In 1934, to keep the scent off the gold in the Philippines, the "Municipal Congress" voted to create an "independent government" for the Philippines. This was done so that the Philippines "Government" could act as the Trustee over the American gold in storage there and the Creditors of the second fake USA couldn't attach it.
Enter World War II, and the Japanese took the Philippines.
They discovered the American gold stashed there and began distributing it to Hellandgone all around the Pacific and even to Nazi Germany and Switzerland.
This is what General Douglas MacArthur was on the spit for, and why he was so desperate to regain the Philippines and also why he was later murdered by the Cabal. Ditto George S. Patton, who also knew what was going on.
This is also how we wound up with Ferdinand Marcos and the Green Hilton Agreements and the Bilateral Minefields Agreements and JFK trying to clean this unholy Mess up.
And this is still part of what we have to clean up.
Not all of the gold stored in the Philippines is American, but a great deal of it is and always was. It's not "abandoned" though certain people and institutions have claimed and wished that it was.
The Scottish Government and the British Monarch of the United Kingdom of Great Britain is liable for it being there, the Municipal United States Congress is liable for it being there, the Popes and the Holy Roman Empire are responsible for it being there, the Philippine Government is responsible for not sorting this out a long time ago, the US Military is responsible for being corrupt and expediting and covering up for all of this.
The actual American People and the States who are owed back their purloined gold, plus all the interest on it, are still here.
Just one more reason to jettison the British and Municipal "US Citizen" statuses and reclaim your "American State Citizen" status.
It's not that we are greedy. It's not that we want to hold the rest of the world feet first to any fire. We want the truth to be known and for us to be at the table and making decisions about our own assets and future.
We want our lawful government fully restored.
We want the criminal elements that have been running these out-of-control commercial corporations removed from power. And no, we are not allowing any more commercial mercenary "wars" to take place on our shores. So just re-pack your 30,000 guillotines and shut down your 800 camps and your billions upon billions of rounds of live ammo in the hands of Federal Agency Personnel (that is, Federal Subcontractors being used as Mercenaries) ----and everyone prepare instead to "decamp".
This is your International Notice, Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals, Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents, from the Lawful Government of this country, which has been at peace since 1814, that any such action promoting Civil War on our soil, precipitated by agents of the Queen or France or any Benelux country or any foreigner at all, including any United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, will result in the perpetrators, their employers, and the respective commercial corporations responsible being held commercially liable, individually, jointly, and severally, and that we shall set the value of all losses down to the hairs on single heads.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
Liars, Liars, Pants on Fire. Good-bye, MGJA
Every suffering has a silver lining.
I can now say with certainty that BeforeItsNews and NesaraNews are Controlled Opposition websites and nothing you read there should be trusted.
And here's the Proof that they are Liars:
www.annavonreitz.com scroll down to Article 485
"An End of My Association With Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton"
This article was written several weeks prior to the actions that put the Colorado Nine in prison. It explains exactly what I told them and why I would not support them in the action that led to their imprisonment.
Far from being the cause of their misery, I tried to save them.
I warned them what would happen and begged them not to do what they proposed and I told them why.
And they would not listen.
So now I am doing the same thing with the Michigan General Jural Assembly and drawing a line between what they are doing and what I am doing--- for the same reasons I separated myself and my followers from the Colorado Nine.
It was Michael R. Hamilton, an insurance company shill working for UN-DOD, that set up Bruce Doucette and the others. Not me.
And besides my own words locked in the timeline on my website there are plenty of eye-witnesses to what went on in Colorado and to what I said and did, and they are outraged by these lies against me.
The Truth will out.
Anyone who doesn't understand jurisdiction and who doesn't make the effort to declare their identity and birthright political status runs the same risk as the Colorado Nine.
And that is what Destry and these other Jokers want you to do.
Stay there like defenseless sitting ducks ripe to be railroaded and arrested.
That's what these guys get paid for-- to mislead you and lie to you and set you up, to make sure that your efforts go nowhere and to make use of your efforts to their own undisclosed ends.
In this case, they are trying to set up another round of the same old fraud and set up a foreign commercial corporation merely calling itself "MICHIGAN"--- not the actual State of the Union that all of you have assumed you were working to rebuild.
The only "Sting" going on is theirs.
But it's not going to wash.
I already showed you the Registered Agents set up to work their vicious fraud scheme.
And guess what? It's the same parent company group out of Nevada -- the same corrupt Generals who are trying to pull off the Zim and Iraqi Dinar scams and sell you their French version of Le Republique -- the French Rothschilds and their Flunkies in Uniform are behind all this.
Everything they said about me is instead true about them. Just like I have always told you-- the pot always calls the kettle black, they always accuse their enemy of doing what they are doing. Always. Predictably.
They are trying to get rich by robbing other countries and working currency scams. They are working for NWO-UN-DOD "Special Ops". They are working to co-opt what you have spent your time building to convert it into a foreign commercial corporation.
And God forbid that you take my advice and come home to the land and soil of your actual State of the Union and claim your protections and guarantees and assets--- because then they won't be able to arrest and Railroad you like they did to Bruce Doucette and the others.
Wake up, America. There are people here among us who look like Americans and talk like Americans--- but they aren't acting in the capacity of Americans.
They are acting as employees of "Federal" commercial corporations--- "United States Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States". Their allegiance is to foreign powers-- the Queen and the Pope.
And many of them have no scruples and deserve no credibility. They think that their "job" is to enslave us and keep us in line. The fact that we are their actual employers doesn't cross their pig-like minds.
So put them to the test. It's simple enough.
Will they declare themselves to be American State Citizens? Yes or no?
If no, whatever they are doing does not involve you and your State. They are not Texans. They are not Coloradans. They are not Wisconsinites. They are "US Citizens" instead.
You can be sure that if "US Citizens" are involved and they will not leave that status once it is explained to them---It's some kind of commercial corporation scam.
Shake the dust from your feet and jog trot away.
I am.
I was right about the Colorado Nine and I am right about the direction the Michigan--- or should I say, MICHIGAN-- General Jural Assembly is headed, too.
If the rats can't get us to dig our own graves by setting up Assemblies they can co-opt they will fall back and tell some more lies.
They will say that all the people associated with National Assembly are in insurrection. And they can make that claim against any "US Citizen" involved in forming any kind of State because it's not legal for actual "US Citizens" to assemble.
Remember--US Citizens have never had any rights under the Constitution. That includes having no right to assemble.
I invite those of you who want to act as Lawful Persons and restore your actual States of the Union --and do so safely--come with me.
I have done my duty and warned everyone. Again.
This is my Public Notice that I am not associated with the National Assembly promoted by Destry Payne and the Michigan General Jural Assembly.
We will be launching a new country-wide teleconference and video series soon for The American States Assembly.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
Basic Nomenclature
So lets review basics and get everyone on the same page.
There are exactly (3) three names associated with our country:
1. The United States -- a Union of soil jurisdiction republican states.
2. The United States of America -- a Federation of land jurisdiction States.
3. and the States of America - a Confederation of inchoate States of States.
Please notice that the definite article "The" is part of the Proper Name of both "The United States" and "The United States of America", but is not part the name of the "States of America".
Note that these Proper Names are always in Upper and Lower Case. This is how they are officially "styled" and any other variation is not allowed when referencing our country and our states, however, also note that there have been commercial corporations infringing on these names for many years, and they have used and abused these names and applied them to commercial corporations.
Thus we have Interlopers calling themselves "The United States of America" [Incorporated] and "The United States" [Incorporated] and even things like the "US Corp" and "USA, Inc." and so on, that have little or nothing to do with our actual government. Some of these entities are governmental service providers. Some are not.
This means that when people start talking about "the US" and about "America" in loose terms, you always have to stop and ask yourself---- which entity are they talking about? Our actual Union of states or our Federation of States or some go-lightly foreign commercial corporation infringing on our Good Names?
Please note that both The United States (soil) and The United States of America (land) are populated by living people called "Natural Persons" and by "Lawful Persons" on the land. These are all unincorporated entities, too.
Your Proper Name, the one your parents gave you, which is also known as a Trade Name or Given Name, is a "Lawful Person" when you stand on the land, but is converted into a "Legal Person" when you stand on the sea.
This distinction is very important.
If you stand on the land, you are recognizable as an American State Citizen and as a Lawful Person owed all the guarantees of the Constitution, including safe passage when you venture out into the wide world of international trade and commerce.
If you stand on the sea, you can be mistaken for a "stateless" Legal Person, from one of the inchoate "States of States" mentioned above, and known as either a "United States Citizen" or a "Citizen of the United States". Such citizens have never been in receipt of any constitutionally protected rights or guarantees. These "US Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States" are not part of the "People" while in Federal Service.
The United States and The United States of America are both unincorporated organizations, called Corporate Persons. They are not incorporated, but they are not sovereign entities, either. Instead, they are Agencies for the sovereign governments of the people (Natural Persons) on the soil and the People (Lawful Persons) on the land.
The United States serves the living people and their republican soil jurisdiction states of the Union. The Texas Republic, for example, is their sovereign domestic realm. Notice the small "s" on "state" in this context. Notice that "The" is part of the Proper Name of "The Texas Republic".
Notice that "The Texas Republic" (soil) is different from "The Republic of Texas" (surface water) and that these same conventions apply to all the other state republics which operate under similarly styled Proper Names and Conventions.
The United States of America serves the Lawful Persons and their Federation of international land jurisdiction States in the same way. Texas is the State representing Texans in this jurisdiction of the law. Notice that "Texas" is just "Texas" --- no "the", "The", no "State of" --- just Texas is the name of this State of the Union.
All the member States of The United States of America Federation are also very simply named: Wisconsin, Maine, Florida, New Hampshire....
These are the States that we are presently engaged in assembling.
These States are populated by Lawful Persons known as either American State Nationals or American State Citizens, as for example, Wisconsin State Nationals or Ohio State Citizens.
American State Nationals owe no service to any government. They are Private Lawful Persons. So long as they don't cause any harm to others or their property, they are free as birds.
American State Citizens have voluntarily agreed to serve their State in some capacity or Office, this may be as simple as signing up for Jury Duty, or joining the State Militia, or it may involve an elected Office, or it may involve being hired to perform a job under the auspices of the State. They are Public Lawful Persons.
They enforce the Public Law, including the Constitutions.
In either case, Lawful Persons are members of the People and owed all the guarantees of the Federal Constitutions.
And now we come to the Third Branch of the American Government, which is organized and chartered by the People of the States: the States of America Confederation, first organized as of March 1, 1781.
Here we find "States of States" ---- not States..
"States of States" are chartered and incorporated entities created by States, thus were have "The State of Georgia" and "The State of New Hampshire", which are two of the original Confederated States, belonging to Georgia and New Hampshire, respectively.
These States of States are commercial corporations chartered by the States.
Any time you see the word "Confederate" we are talking about "States of States". In fact, all the entities involved in the Civil War were "Confederate States" ---- meaning States of States, regardless of whether they were "North" or "South".
States of States, unlike actual States, are not physically defined. They have no borders or specific location in space. They are called "inchoate" or "incomplete States" as a result.
These entities function in the airy realm of Global Commerce, which is business between two or more incorporated entities.
So the Pecking Order in the American Government goes like this:
The living people own the republican soil jurisdiction states operated as State Republics, for example, The Texas Republic and The Republic of Texas.
Their Union of republican states doing business as The United States [Unincorporated} holds the land jurisdiction States and their Federation of States, The United States of America [Unincorporated], which the living people operate as Lawful Persons.
And the member States of The United States of America charter, own, and operate the Confederation of States of States. Texas owns The State of Texas, and New Hampshire owns The State of New Hampshire, for example, as businesses engaged in global commerce.
Remember this very important fact: "commerce" is business between two or more incorporated entities.
Everything else is either domestic (in-state) trade or International Trade, which includes business between incorporated and corporate entities.
The original States of States which formed the primary part of the Federal Government --- the Federal Branch of the Federal Government --- were mothballed after the Civil War, pending "Reconstruction" that never took place.
The actual States of the Union have to be assembled in order for the Federal States of States to be reconstructed and brought out of the mothballs.
This is because only the States and People have the authority and power to charter their own States of States.
And this is necessary because without our own Federal States of States, the Federal Government cannot function as it is meant to function and foreign interests are able to commandeer our business functions.
We have been limping along using Territorial States of States and even Municipal STATES OF STATES, but what really needs to happen is for the States and People of this country to get organized and take care of their own vastly overdue business.
So that's what we are doing, and of course, all those who have benefited from our failure to do this earlier, are aghast and trying to stop us and co-opt us and do everything they can to undermine and discredit our efforts and to keep the People from reconstructing their Federal States of States.
But the stubborn facts remain:
The republican states (people) own the Federation States and the (People/Lawful Persons) own the Confederation of States of States (Legal Persons--- including all Federal Persons.).
The republican states (people) taken together are our National Government, the Federation States taken together are our International Government, and our Confederation States of States taken together are meant to operate our interests in the global realm of commerce.
Please note that only Lawful Persons can operate in the realm of Lawful Money (gold and silver) and only Legal Persons can operate in the realm of Commercial Script.
The dearth of American State Citizens consciously operating as Lawful Persons --- that is, People who are willing and able to operate in their birthright political capacity --- is causing problems not only for us, but for the whole world.
Without Lawful Persons we can't operate our Lawful States and without Lawful States we can't incorporate new "States of States" or reconstruct the old ones.
The sooner we face these facts and get our heads screwed on and our house in order, the better.
The United States = National = State Republics = the Union
The United States of America = International = States of the Union = the Federation of States
the States of America = Global = Federal States of States = the Confederation of States of States.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
Thoughts About Undeclared Federal Agents:
Federal Agents have a moral and legal responsibility to disclose themselves for what they are when directly questioned. It arises from law forbidding entrapment, trespass, and other crimes.
Sometimes called a Bevins Declaration, you can put these Moles between a rock and a hard place simply by making a statement at the beginning of your actual Assembly meetings and calls to the effect:
"Anyone here still claiming any form of US Citizenship or employment with any Federal Agency is now -- for the next segment of the call (meeting, etc., ) invited to either declare your presence and business here, or directed to leave the Assembly at this time."
This allows the Assembly to have open calls and meetings where more people can be educated and assisted, but then also to close meetings and teleconferences to Federal Agents.
If Federal Agents fail to declare themselves and stay after they have been invited to leave, they have broken the law and anything they obtain as a result of acting in a clandestine fashion is tainted by fraud and inadmissible in court.
This can also help ferret out people in leadership positions who shouldn't be there.
The man actually responsible for the incarceration of the Colorado Nine was a Federal Insurance Agent named Michael R. Hamilton. At least, that is the name he used to do his dirty work.
He basically encouraged them to believe things that aren't true but which are incorrect "common knowledge".
So they believed that they were "US Citizens".
They believed that they were owed all the constitutional guarantees----while claiming to be US Citizens.
They believed that the "STATE OF COLORADO COURT" was their court and had to answer to their Grand Jury.
And none of those things are true. When I told them they were wrong and that none of these things were true, Michael R. Hamilton puffed out his chest and basically said, "Ignore her! She's just a woman!"
Michael R. Hamilton stood in the background and encouraged them to assume things they had assumed all their lives---- wrong things, as it happens---- and egged them on.
When it came time for the arrests, Michael R. Hamilton was nowhere to be found.
I wonder how much grief and loss could have been spared, if the organizers of the Colorado Assembly had simply made that little Bevins Declaration part of their ritual?
How much could have been spared if the men involved had been less "sure of what they didn't know"?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
Red Alert - Which Came First?
The Michigan General Jural Assembly and Destry Payne have claimed that you can retain "US Citizenship" and be a member of a State Jural Assembly.
I called them out on it and basically said ----no, you have to be an American State Citizen to operate an American State Assembly.
Go figure, right?
To date, they haven't come up with a single shred of evidence in support of their position: no evidence that any State of the Union ever accepted Dual Citizenship.
This issue is too important both for your own safety and for the validity of all your work on an Assembly to bypass and leave to hand-waving.
If it were "no big deal" I wouldn't be objecting.
Now that their claims that I was responsible for what happened to the Colorado Nine have also been thoroughly debunked, and it has been proven that instead, I gave the Colorado Nine good advice that they ignored ---just like I am giving you now--- it's time to further consider the facts.
"US Citizens" are Federal Employees or Dependents by definition. The condition of "US Citizenship" arises from Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2 and Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3 of the Federal Constitutions. A very complete discussion of these issues appears in the United States Supreme Court Case Hooven and Allison v. Evatt.
US Citizens have no "constitutional rights or guarantees" because they are subjects defined by the Constitutions and they are adopting a political status created by the Constitutions, so logically, they are not Parties to the Constitutions, never were and cannot be.
That's why "Equal Civil Rights" exist and what the whole Civil Rights Movement was about. US Citizens have no recognizable "Natural and Unalienable Rights" and never have had.
The Municipal Congress was forced to give them privileges known as "Civil Rights" to make up for this -- but they remain only privileges, something the Master gives and the Master can take away.
We, the People, Lawful Persons living in the actual States of the Union, are Parties to the Constitutions via the participation of our States and enjoy a completely different status and stand in a completely different jurisdiction.
Once we expatriate from any Territorial or Municipal citizenship obligation-- a status that was merely "conferred" and "presumed" upon us without our knowledge or consent, we are free to operate as American State Nationals or as American State Citizens. Not until.
US Citizens can be arrested for doing what we are doing, so it is an urgent matter of concern that people be given the facts up front and be given the tools to extract themselves from US Citizenship presumptions.
I will also point out that it makes no sense whatsoever to retain any tie to such a political status as a "US Citizen" if you are not currently a Federal Employee or Dependent.
Federal Service is a condition of "voluntary servitude", as in indentured servitude. You sign a labor contract that requires you to function as a "US Citizen" for a period of years.
Once you retire or leave the US Military or Federal Civilian Service, you are no longer required to function in that capacity---and why would you, considering that it obligates you to many unpleasant duties, including paying Federal Income Tax on every penny you earn?
Loss of your private property rights?
Loss of your Constitutional guarantees?
Why would anyone in their right mind claim such a foreign and subservient political status, if they didn't have to as a condition of employment?
The vast majority of us don't have to, and for the work at hand --- actually assembling the States of the Union --- we can't. We have to come home and dig our own ditches.
We cannot remain "at sea" in Federal jurisdiction and accomplish work on the land---- and vice versa.
So if you want to stumble into the same jurisdictional trap as the Colorado Nine and quite possibly suffer the same fate, look at the logic and the facts and lead the stampede to get your paperwork done.
Retirees from Federal Services and those who have earned their Social Security Benefits and Military Retirement benefits from Federal Employment are still welcome and able to return home to the land and soil jurisdiction.
They may still have to pay federal income tax on the portion of their retirement that is based on federal income, but they are otherwise free to collect -- have their pensions and their freedom, too.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
13 hrs ·
Correction: Notaries Cannot Lose Their Bonds
Among the other Disinformation being spread is the idea that Notaries could "lose their bonds" if they Witness our Acts of Expatriation.
Those making such comments are in true La-La-Land.
All your life, you have been signing for a fictional entity --- your Person.
In fact, no "State of State" Notary has ever Witnessed anything but people signing as Persons or PERSONS, so you are not doing anything unusual or wrong or even questionable by signing our paperwork, and neither is the Notary doing anything questionable by witnessing it.
Here's what the armchair quarterbacks are missing:
In international jurisdiction there are Lawful Persons and Legal Persons, but no living people at all. So, Question One---- which one are you? Lawful Person or Legal Person?
We settle the first question --- Lawful Person or Legal Person? -- with the Act of Expatriation and the Deed of Reconveyance.
We record the fact and create the evidence that our Proper Name is a Lawful Person standing on the land and soil of our State, so that it is no longer open to any interpretation and we are not subject to being mistaken for Legal Persons and attacked as such.
In municipal jurisdiction there are also only commercial corporations functioning as LEGAL PERSONS. Again, no living people at all.
Question Two: where are those PERSONS domiciled on Earth and who do they belong to?
We settle the second question regarding LEGAL PERSONS with the Certificate of Assumed Names and the Form 56, which re-flags the PERSON as an American PERSON (not Puerto Rican) and then Form 56 makes the Secretary of the Treasury responsible for paying ITS debts. Not us.
Everyone (including the Notaries) needs to realize that "State of State" Notaries, like State of State Sheriffs, don't have any public bonds associated with what is in fact a private corporate office providing a public service as a paid or unpaid contractor.
Instead, the State of State corporations "self-insure" and have risk management departments. In reality what that means is that they carry private liability insurance like any big corporation.
You can't lose bonding you don't have.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
12 hrs ·
Act of State is Insufficient
Now we have more Disinformation hitting the streets---
people saying that you don't have to expatriate, and that an "Act of State" is sufficient.
Tell that to Tim Turner, presently serving ---- is it 18 years? ----in Federal Prison.
Ever play with an Oriental Puzzle Box when you were a kid?
These wooden boxes are often intricately carved and have all sorts of hidden locks and slides and cut out "keys" that are part of the box. My Dad would give me one of these things that appeared to be solid blocks of intricately carved wood -- a bit like a Rubik's Cube -- and see how long I had to fiddle with it to get it open. Inside, he would have hidden some little treat....
What our Employees have done is similar to the Puzzle Box. They have set things up so that "you can't get there from here".
You can't do an "Act of State" until you have a "State" and you don't have a "State" if you are any kind of "US Citizen".
US Citizens live, work, breathe, and have their being in the world of "inchoate" States of States. They can't access or operate actual States. They are by definition "stateless".
So when a US Citizen attempts to do an "Act of State", the courts just laugh at him and ignore him---- and rightly so.
Tim Turner was trying to act in a capacity he couldn't act in. He couldn't access any "State" because as a US Citizen he wasn't on the land and soil to begin with.
He hadn't done the groundwork of re-conveying his Proper Name to the land and soil and hadn't expatriated from US Citizenship, so, he couldn't do a valid Act of State.
Tim will spend 8 to 10 years of his life in jail for making that mistake, and now members of the Michigan General Jural Assembly are telling you that an "Act of State" without returning to the land and soil and without expatriating from US Citizenship is sufficient?
They want you to make the same mistake Tim Turner already made--- ? Hello? Houston.....
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
10 hrs ·
The Reason Why
The reason all these defamatory hit pieces are suddenly being pelted at me is because I am taking on the corrupt Generals who set up the Nevada Corporation to run the phony UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and who are trying to run another round of the Great Fraud on us.
These --- Sun-Tzu and Destry et alia --- are the guys trying to sell the French Rothschild "Neu Republique" to us---and if they can't sell it honestly, are trying to bring it in the back door. These same bunch of Freebooters have been running all the UN-DOD-NWO scams.
It's not me who is the "Cabal Agent". Remember: it's always the pot calling the kettle black. It's their MO to accuse their enemies of what they are doing themselves.
Just watch and see who the actual Cabal Agents are ---- those who are spreading a LOT of disinfo about me and about other things, too ---- telling Notaries that they could lose non-existent "bonding" if they Witness our expatriation paperwork, telling people that Tim Turner's "Act of State" will protect them, when it didn't protect Tim Turner (he got an 18 year prison sentence because he relied on an "Act of State" he had no capacity to do).
All sorts of crazy crap coming out of those boys now, but manure is manure and it costs those who spread it as well as those who listen to it.
The Thinking People will see the logic and abandon the fake stuff, and all the Dunderheads who can't think beyond their Eighth Grade indoctrination into La-La-Land, will be left behind. I am sorry for them, but--- goats to the left, sheep to the right. It isn't as if I haven't spent eight years trying to educate everyone.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
Help Is Here!
We are very thankful to announce that a team of volunteers has formed to help all the many people who need a little "extra help" to understand the purpose of the paperwork we use to reclaim our birthright political status and also practical help getting the paperwork filled out and recorded.
Many of you have already gotten through the paperwork using examples published on my website www.annavonreitz.com (Article 928) and still more have "Done It Yourselves" using the explanations and self-help pdfs and assistance posted at PaperUpNow.Com ---- but let's face it, many of us just need a little hand-holding because we don't understand a form or don't have access to a computer or the local recorder's office is being difficult.
So--- now the new Help Service is available! Go to the front page of my website and scroll down until you see these words in red:
To Get Help filling out and recording the paperwork from article # 928, Look at the form on the right AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE, and fill in the information and submit the form. You will be contacted by someone from the team that does this, usually within 24 hours.
We hope to have an automated website up and running in the next couple weeks that will have very detailed information for a wide variety of exceptions and circumstances you may be facing to answer questions like:
What if I was born in Washington, DC?
What if I am a Federal Employee?
What if I am retired military?
What if I am an immigrant?
What if I've been married seven times?
We also hope to use this additional service to help people apply for and receive the proper passports for American State Nationals and American State Citizens, to help you find your State Assembly, and ultimately to assist you with recording documents and other tasks and resources that will make life easier as you come home to the land and soil jurisdiction of the actual States of the Union.
Thank you, Volunteers!!!!!
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz Answer's a readers question:
Basically, we should not have SSN's, but we've been snookered into participating in a retirement program for foreigners that we aren't eligible for and they've collected a lot of money from us and left a lot of people with no other pension options, so we have to address this as we would address any other commercial corporation that did this.
Once you use your Certificate of Assumed Name(s) and move the Federal Municipal PERSON back to the land and soil jurisdiction, you have re-flagged that "Vessel" as an American, not a Puerto Rican, so it falls under our Public Law, and not their Spanish Inquisitional Law, together with all assets and beneficial interests, then, when you use the Form 56 to make Mnuchin the Fiduciary responsible, you also make him and the "US Treasury Department" responsible for keeping the accounts and paying ITS bills-- including any charges brought by the courts or the hospitals or IRS. They can't mess with you anymore whether you use the SSN or not.
They still owe "HIM" whatever they owed him, and if anyone wants to get in your face and pretend that you are responsible for paying HIS debts, you already know what to tell them: "I returned that ACCOUNT to the Secretary of the Treasury. He's the Fiduciary responsible for settling any charges related to it."
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·
Big Announcements and Things I Have to Ask Myself
I have to ask myself....if my house were burning down, would I care who brought me the news in time to save it?
No, they could be an alcoholic communist cyclops, and I wouldn't care less.
If I were the heir of a gigantic fortune, would it matter who told me the news?
No, I'd probably be stunned, and then act like all those people who win the Publisher's Clearing House Sweepstakes.
Just as we know that the Satanists among us always accuse their enemies of doing what they are themselves doing, we also know that they attack the messengers to draw attention away from the message.
"Yeah, your house is burning down, but did you smell beer on that guy's breath?"
What I am suffering through right now is just Satanism du Jour.
This kind of "character assassination" and reckless lying about multiple things all at once is what these Deep State reptiles are famous for. The Bigger the Lie, the Better---they think.
We can't change them. We can only change ourselves. And learn to think for ourselves. And recognize them for what they are.
Much of what I have had to tell you has not been pleasant.
Who wants to know that our beloved country has been grossly defrauded in breach of trust and that our people have been enslaved for six generations?
Instead of living in the land of the free, we have been shanghaied and left adrift at sea by our own employees.
We've been living under a British-controlled military junta since the 1860's, a United States version of the Raj in India.
Who wants to face up to that?
Who wants to hear that our own employees, people taking their paychecks from our pockets, have been planning and preparing for another "civil war"--and their entire purpose is to kill us off, so that they and their other creditors won't have to pay us back for what they have already stolen from us?
That's the 'house on fire" message. The bucket brigade is forming. The Fire Department has been called.
But then, there's the other message, too.
You are all heirs to an unimaginable fortune. You own controlling interest in all the Fortune 500 Corporations. You own vast quantities of gold. All the land and soil of this country, all the surface and ground water, all the public infrastructure, belongs to you.
You own Wall Street, the banks, the New York Stock Exchange. You own the Federal Reserve Banks. You own all the Municipal and Territorial corporations in this country and most such corporations worldwide.
Why? They have all been chartered by the rats in your name, via abuse of your Patent Office.
To be sure, they didn't mean for you to ever actually benefit from any of this, but as it turns out, now that you woke up, now that you remember who you are, you hold the keys and the titles.
You still have to come forward. You still have to make the effort to douse the flames and reclaim your birthright. You still have to wake all the way up and take action in your own behalf.
I and many others saved you the option to save your house and your inheritance. Millions upon millions of Americans are eligible to come home and take charge again, because of us.
But it's your call. You can stand on the lawn and watch your house burn. You can abandon your birthright and be left with nothing. You can be misled and distracted.
Those of us who know the history and see the logic ---and who know what has to be done and how to do it---are migrating home to the land and soil and organizing The American States Assembly.
Those who don't get it, are being left behind. It's too bad, but we can't waste time and spend our resources infighting with ignoramuses and Undeclared Federal Agents.
We are assembling the actual geographically defined States of the Union.
No franchises of commercial corporations here.
We are clearing our decks and recording our political status so we can act in our lawful capacity to do this work. We are all Lawful Persons. Not Legal Persons. And proud of it.
We are going to finish the so-called Reconstruction and re-charter our missing Federal States of States.
Ultimately, we are going to convene a Continental Congress.
We have left behind all presumptions of Federal citizenship obligations and are proud to be plain old American State Nationals and American State Citizens.
We are hosting a Monday night countrywide teleconference beginning March 11th. We will be pre-screening questions you may want to send in for us to answer on the show and taking limited call-ins.
For now, you can send questions to "American States Assembly" at my email: avannavon@gmail.com.
Please give us a good solid contact email so we can get back to you if clarification is needed.
There will be a one hour Open Session each week. I won't be moderating, but I and other members of The Living Law Firm will be present and available. The Open Session is for everyone who wants or needs more information, including US Citizens who need to know their options.
There will also be a brand new website for The American States Assembly, where we will post information and provide contact with all the State Assemblies.
As already announced, a Help Service is now available for those of you who have questions or need help filling out and recording your claim to your Good Name and Estate. (Please note, all of you who have been facing difficult Recording Clerks.) There is a portal to contact these wonderful volunteers posted on the front page of my website: www.annavonreitz.com.
There is also a DIY website, PaperUpNow.com, to help answer most frequently asked questions and provide helpful templates/examples. The webmaster is offering a sign-up page to help State Assembly
Coordinators who are engaged in organizing actual State Assemblies.
Again, no foreign commercial corporations or "STATE" franchises here.
We are working to set up an automated referral site that will address more complex questions and issues for people and hopefully function as a clearinghouse for recording national-level paperwork for each State and also help you deal with obtaining Travel Cards to replace Driver Licenses and to obtain proper Passports.
Job One is to educate people and give them the tools to function safely and happily day to day -- help them return home to their proper political status and jurisdiction.
Job Two is to form up the actual State Assemblies and properly operate the land jurisdiction States of the Union-- this includes organizing the General Assembly, the Jural Assembly, and the Executive Assembly for each State.
Job Three is to re-charter our Federal States of States and bring an end to the so-called Reconstruction Era.
Job Four is to educate ourselves and prepare to convene a long-overdue Continental Congress.
So there it is, The Road Map, for everyone to see. No cops and robbers. No Secret Agent Man hide-and-seek agendas. No military Ops.
There's a lot of hard work to be done.
So here we are. Your house is burning. The neighbors, old Mr. and Mrs. Goldstein, saved your dogs and cat and houseplants.
George, a soldier home on furlough, crawled through the bedroom window and saved the family Bible and photographs.
Jim, a retired IBEW worker who was passing by, organized the bucket brigade.
Phil, the Pastor from First Congregational Church, used his skill as a locksmith to open your front door and give the firemen access to the blaze.
Lucille, your neighbor on the other side of the street, a woman you've never met before, ran around collecting buckets and running water hoses, then made coffee and sandwiches for everyone.
Jose, the guy who usually mows your lawn on Saturdays, called up his whole extended family to come help haul your heirloom furniture and computers out onto the lawn.
Jake Miller got your car and the kids' bicycles out of the attached garage.
They all did this for you out of the goodness of their hearts, so that even if your house burns down, the important and irreplaceable things will be preserved for you and your kids. And that was their only agenda.
It's the same with The Living Law Firm and with me, and all the horse manure in China --- or Nevada --- doesn't change a thing.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
34 mins ·
A Repeat of Answers Already Given:
Certain people who will remain unnamed and hopefully forgotten are tramping around pretending that they have valid questions that I haven't answered. In fact, I answered these questions (and more) a long time ago, and the replies are published. But just so that everyone sees the answers and knows that I answered them and that I have no purpose of evasion, here are the answers again.
Would someone please make sure that Jeff Dougherty in Portland, Oregon, gets these plastered in front of his nose, so that he can stop pretending that I haven't answered?
1. Who swore you in as Judge? - please provide doc
The Chaplain of our State Assembly, as it happens, heard my Acceptance of Office, because the last competent judge in our Assembly died of complications of old age. Who hears your Acceptance doesn't matter. The fact that you Accepted the Office and that there were Witnesses to the fact --- that matters.
No documentation beyond the memory of those present and a written Witness Testimony exists; and it wasn't a "swearing" in. Land jurisdiction judges don't swear oaths at all, and if you read your Bible and knew your Land Law, you would already know this.
What oath did you take? and please provide a copy
As explained above, land jurisdiction Justices don't "swear Oaths" and NEVER have.
By what authority has made your husband Head of State?
Blood inheritance is what rules in the international jurisdiction of the sea -- this is the realm of Monarchs. It has nothing directly to do with the land jurisdiction that we are restoring, but since you ask --- he inherited the duty and responsibility from his ancestors all the way back to William the Conqueror. He didn't ask for it and didn't want it and avoided it most of his life. He came forward to challenge the Queen's bid to claim all our "abandoned" land as hers.
This was bad news for the Queen, but as Jim's ancestor, William Belcher, already granted you the status of being a "sovereign in your own right", it doesn't preclude 350 million other Americans from stepping forward and challenging her claim, too. Having Jim do it from a pre-established American sovereignty based on the Norman Conquest was simply a matter of demonstrating to the whole world that, yes, we are still here, and no, this land is not abandoned nor is it lacking valid sovereigns to operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
What impact did the 1783 Treaty of Peace have for We the People being recognized as sovereign people?
The language of the Treaty is complex enough so that many people -- apparently including you -- are deceived by it.
Among other stumbling blocks, even though it's purpose is to put the final touches on a peace process ending the Revolutionary War, the Treaty continues to call King George the "Prince of the United States" and also to name him the "Arch-Treasurer" thereof.
It speaks of the "free and independent and sovereign people of the United States" in almost the same breath that it speaks of "inhabits" remaining to provide essential services.
So what are we do make of all this?
The Treaty was written in 1783, but "the United States" -- which is the Municipal Holy Roman Empire Government and not "The United States" most people assume---was already established here by Benjamin Franklin in the 1750's when he applied to be Post Master and established a seat of government for it in Philadelphia.
So under the Treaty of Peace some thirty years later, they are agreeing that King George will act as the "Prince" (under the Pope) and the Arch-Treasurer of the Commonwealth and Municipal interests of "the United States".
This has nothing to do with our Union of republican states: The United States, which the King doesn't even deign to mention.
But in the second context, when speaking about the "free, independent, and sovereign people of the United States" versus the "inhabitants" thereof, as you can see down to this day, nobody living as a member of a Commonwealth and nobody subject to the Pope's Municipal Government can be considered "free", "sovereign" or "independent".
This references "the people" of the soil jurisdiction who are already recognized as "sovereigns in their own right" as "free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States" --- meaning free, sovereign, and independent people outside of "he United States" which is again, the Municipal Government.
The "inhabitants" remaining to provide "essential services" are British troops and loyalists and employees of the Holy Roman Empire, all working in various government-related jobs. They were allowed to remain here and work here to provide a continuity of services. Thus they are "inhabitants" --- temporarily "residing" here, but not part of the people.
In modern terms, these "inhabitants" then were fulfilling the same position as "US Citizens" now, even though the creation of "United States Citizens" (British) and "Citizens of the United States" (Holy Roman Empire) would not be more formally defined until the adoption of the Original Federal Constitution, "The Constitution for the united States of America", four years later.
What impact did the 1st Act of Congress 1789 have on the oath of office?
None at all, so far as the land and soil jurisdictions of this country are concerned, since none of us swear Oaths at all.
But both the international jurisdiction of the sea and the global municipal realm of commerce not only allow but require the swearing of oaths and the imposition of punishments, so, before the Congress could adopt the (British) Territorial Constitution called "The Constitution of the United States of America", in 1789, they had to change things to allow "swearing" and taking of oaths, yet make it clear that these pertained only to British Territorial and Municipal Officers and Offices. Which is precisely what the First Act of Congress in 1789 does.
What have you accomplished for the people of your home state Alaska?
My "home state" is Wisconsin, but as for Alaska ---
Well, let's see, I kept the Queen from selling off her "tribute" rights and interest in our underground minerals to China, and I kept the Russians from claiming that the only valid land interests remaining in Alaska belonged to the Russian Orthodox Church here --- thereby forestalling their excuse to claim back Alaska as Russian land.
What have you done for your State of the Union that can compare to that?
Let's see what you can answer.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·
Dear Bobby,....
Bobby, I don't know who you are, but I feel that you deserve some honest answers. So I am going to give you what you aren't getting elsewhere.
I just re-published answers I already gave to Jeff Dougherty, who persists in trying to hide his identity behind the nickname "Sun Tzu"--- speaking of "obfuscating": he has pretended that I didn't answer his questions, when they are published on my blog and now as a whole separate article as of this morning: "A Repeat of Answers Already Given".
Let's go over the latest screed of venomous misrepresentation and ignorance point by point. I will reduce the size of his typeface because he is very verbose and wordy and leave my replies in large type so you can distinguish them easily.
[Facebook readers see on my website.]
JEFF:
Dear Bobby,
Thank you for posting on the forums (MGJA).
I discovered your post on the forum and I am responding to you and it.
I agree with some of what you said, Anna Von Reitz is in fact the individual who's writings first WOKE ME UP to the situation at hand. I began working with the Michigan Jural Assembly members as soon as Anna DECLARED, "Michigan Jural Assembly did everything right!" - Those were her exact words.
Anna's Reply: Yes, Bobby, they even fooled me -- for a time. They had the trees right enough, but not the forest. It turns out that they are bent on trying to assemble a "State of State" and not an actual land jurisdiction State at all. The process of assembling is the same, but the inputs and the end results are very different. In their case, they wind up with a foreign commercial corporation franchise. In our case, we wind up with a functioning State of the Union.
JEFF:
So I worked with members of the MGJA(Michigan Grand Jural Assembly) to discover what it meant to "Peaceably assemble, to redress grievances, and to self represent," the MGJA members helped me understand all of these things. The MGJA members informed me that I did not have to "repudiate my U.S. citizenship," as it would bring great hardship upon my life. MGJA members did however tell me that if I chose to do so (repudiate citizenship) that I WAS WITHIN MY RIGHT to do so.
Anna's actual answer: I never told anyone to "renounce" or "repudiate" --- you have to "rebut" presumptions by producing superior evidence and you need to "expatriate" from any "presumed" political status as a "US Citizen". These are different actions and they have different results. I have had to repeatedly rescue people who "renounced" their US Citizenship and got stuck in foreign countries, but none of that was on my advice.
JEFF: However, the MGJA members then put me in touch with other Michigan Grand Jural Members who HAD REPUDIATED THEIR U.S. CITIZENSHIP and the information I learned from them WAS OF GREAT IMPORTANCE.
Just as Anna Von Reitz has advised, [No-- I never advised anyone to do any of this. It is contrary to what I actually teach on my website. I teach people how to "expatriate"-- not "repudiate" and I have never in my life told anyone to return their BC's or anything else. No such action is necessary--- but changing your political status back to being an American State Citizen or American State National, is.]
JEFF:
…. in rder to repudiate your citizenship, you send them back your Social Security Card, you send them back all other U.S. government provided identification too (driver's license). Then the MGJA members informed me of what happens when you get pulled over without a driver's license, how the intentionally low IQ hired law enforcement officers do not give a rats butt about any papers you have on you to prove that you have the right to drive without a driver's license. The very presenting of "Documents" to the officer, has in many times alerted that officer that you are a threat, a domestic terrorist known as a sovereign citizen, and anyone paying attention knows that the government has declared sovereign citizens as "Domestic Terrorists."
Anna: In order to be a "Domestic Terrorist" you have to be "domestic" with respect to the Federal Government. Neither I nor anyone I teach is "domestic" with respect to the Federal Government. Hello? US Citizens are "domestic" with respect to the Federal Government. American State Citizens are not. Hello, Houston? Hello?
I have NEVER told anyone to do anything like this. Ever. Bobby, are you listening? He is telling you that I said things I never said, and that other people acting upon "my" advice were harmed. What I in fact teach is published on my website and not open to interpretation. I have never once told anyone to "renounce" their US Citizenship. I have taught people how to properly "expatriate" from it and told them why.
There isn't even a tiny bit of truth in anything being told to you, except for the fact that people who try to exit the system the wrong way suffer. Pretending that I suggested any of this is the worst kind of BIG LIE.
JEFF: The Michigan Grand Jury members I spoke with who had repudiated their U.S. citizenship informed me that upon the law enforcement officer realizing that they had just traffic stopped a "Domestic Terrorist," the MGJA member was then cuffed and stuffed.
Upon refusing to sign the corporation, "United States Inc," paperwork at the local jail, the MGJA members sat in jail for 60 days, which is as long as the U.S. corporation can legally hold someone for driving without a license. Please bare in mind that these were 60 days in jail for FIRST OFFENSE.
Anna replies : This is because despite all their "protest" and "rebellion" and "insurrection" against the "State of State" corporations, they hadn't changed their actual political status, so they were still held to Statutory Law and still considered bound by private contract to that law. Uh-duh.
JEFF: So, I present you the following evidence.
1) Is a U.S. Citizen protected by the Bill of Rights?
Answer: YES
Anna's actual answer--- No, they are not, and never have been. At best, they are "granted" Equal Civil Rights.
JEFF: 2) Does the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights guarantee the right to, "Peaceably Assemble, to Redress Grievances, and to Self Represent?"
JEFF's Answer: YES, IT DOES
Anna's actual answer: It gives the right to assemble to Americans, but not to British and Holy Roman Empire "Citizens"---- that is, US Citizens. US Citizens can be arrested for "assembling".
JEFF: 3) Yet Anna says that in order to EXERCISE that right, you need to repudiate your U.S. Citizenship!
Answer: THAT IS FALSE INFORMATION
Anna's actual answer: what I am telling you has been true since the foundations of this country. As of 1787. And it has never changed. The people trying to lead you are blind as bats and will get you in real trouble, just like the Colorado Nine, who didn't listen to me, either.
JEFF's FINDINGS:
A) Why would Anna Von Reitz knowingly provide false statements?
Anna's answer: I didn't. It's you that is not being honest. I am telling you the God's Honest and Verifiable Truth. You just aren't accepting it.
JEFF:
B) Anna originally used the title of Judge in her name.
JEFF's Answer: The Alaska Government HAS NO RECORD of any variations of Anna Von Reitz, aka Anna Reitzinger, aka Anna Von Reitzinger EVER BEING A JUDGE in the State of Alaska.
Anna's actual answer: who ever said I was acting as a Justice or a Judge for any "State of State"??? Can you see the difference between these two things: "State" and "State of State"?
State equals actual State of the Union, geographically defined, physical, actual
State of State equals corporate franchise of a foreign commercial corporation, legal fiction, inchoate, not physical or actual.
Learn the difference so you know what you are talking about before you even open your mouth.
JEFF: C) Anna originally stated that she was a COMMON LAW JUDGE.
JEFF's Answer: In order to be a Common Law Judge, Anna Von Reitz would of been required to submit her name for candidacy in a local election in her county of the State of Alaska and she would have been required to get 60 signatures to get her name on the ballot, and then if there was no incumbent, she would have obtained the seat of "JUSTICE OF THE PEACE."
Anna's actual reply: I did "stand for election" --- unopposed as it happened, because nobody else stepped forward into the gap left when our one remaining Justice died of old age. As for any "60 signatures" that applies to "States of States" not States. Our States are now so de-populated thanks to idiots that it would be hard to find sixty knowledgeable jurors in a State the size of Alaska, but thankfully, our States don't require that.
All the things you are "assuming" to apply-- don't. That's because you are operating in a "State of State" framework and mindset instead of being aware of the actual State.
Again, I never said I was representing any "State of State" organization at all. I am occupying the land jurisdiction of a State. Two different things. I have never said otherwise.
This is all people trying to confuse oranges with apples, and apparently on purpose because I have been VERY clear about this from the very beginning.
JEFF: She did not run for election, nor did she obtain the seat.
That is why when the FBI visited her, they asked her the following questions:
1) What Oath did you swear to become a Common Law Judge?
2) What is the significance of the 1783 Treat of Peace?
Upon the FBI leaving, she IMMEDIATELY removed her title as "Judge."
Anna's actual reply: The FBI has never "visited" me, never addressed me at all, so it would be hard for them to ask me any questions and also hard for me to make any replies! Ha! The FBI doesn't want to talk to me, and in fact, they are well-aware that it would be inappropriate for them address me.
This is just pure fabricated lies.
And I am still a "Judge" if I act as a Postal District Judge and I am still a "Justice" if I act for a land jurisdiction court.
Learn the verbiage. It matters.
JEFF: She however did not inform 9 of her students in Colorado to do the same. They were all days later arrested, some of whom are still in jail.
Anna's actual reply: I fought with the leader of the Colorado Nine, Bruce Doucette, for three months prior to the action that led to their arrest, trying to make them see sense and own truth, just like I am doing here.
They wouldn't listen to the logic or the facts, so I finally drew a line in the sand and published notice officially ending my association with them. It appears as Article 485 on my website www.annavonreitz.com for anyone who wants to know what I actually told them at the time and why I shook the dust off my feet. I believe the title is "An End to My Association with Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton".
Hamilton was a Federal Insurance Agent. I am fairly sure he was sent into the group to mislead the members.
Anyway, that Article was published well-before the Colorado Nine took their ignorance and rode off into history. What they did was not on my advice. So count that as ANOTHER BIG LIE being promoted by "Sun Tzu" --using a fake name.
JEFF: Now I present the final evidence:
An Interview Anna Von Reitz gave:
https://www.splcenter.org/…/interview-sovereign-judge-anna%…
The above interview given by Anna Von Reitz exposes the true nature of this PSY-OP.
Anna says"You have to go through all this process and all of this development of a public paper trail in order to reestablish who you are."
Answer: FALSE
Anna's actual answer: Yes, you do have to do this, just as I have always taught, and there is no getting around it. They have created "evidence" in the form of Birth Certificates and similar documents that show you have a private contract with their commercial corporations. Until and unless you create "Superior Evidence" rebutting their claims, you are subject to them, to their "State of State" franchises, and all their private law. What I said in the interview was correct and still is and I stand by it. If it were not true, I would be in jail and if I were not validly a land jurisdiction Justice, I would be arrested for impersonating a judge. These people (Sun Tzu, Destry, MGJA, et alia) are either ignorant or deliberately misleading you.
JEFF: Anna is attempting to make it difficult for you to represent yourself, she is trying to make you think that it is difficult to exercise your GOD given rights, when all you have to do is pull out your BILL of RIGHTS, dust it off, and read the FIRST AMENDMENT.
Anna's actual answer--- this would be true, if you had any rights guaranteed by the Constitutions, but as a "US Citizen" you have no such rights or guarantees.
JEFF: Anna says you have to repudiate your U.S. Citizenship.
Answer: FALSE
Anna's actual answer--- see the discussion above about "repudiation" vs. "expatriation".
"United States Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States" were defined by the Constitutions. They are not and never were parties to the Constitutions and do not have constitutional guarantees. This is why when you appear in a US District Court the Judge will tell you (as a US Citizen) that the "Constitution doesn't apply here and I will hold you in contempt if you mention it again". Some patriots are too stupid to get it and won't learn no matter how many times their noses get rubbed in it.
JEFF: Anna is very effectively performing several tasks:
1) Obviate
define Obviate:
Anna is "Obviating" threats, to "Remove threats who would pose a challenge to Corporate United States Inc's RECKLESS OPERATIONS and ENDLESS felony OVER BILLING, there is trillions of dollars more to steal coupled with vast underground resources to steal from the people, vast resources of public lands to SELL, which is a theft against the people as the public lands were constitutionally granted to the people forever, and could not be withheld, sold, or multiple use permit denied.
Anna's actual answer: the only "PERSONS" intent on stealing anything are the foreigners among us, specifically, "US CITIZENS" working for foreign commercial corporations, and as I just published (again) this week, the rotters are intent on trying to set up franchise corporations merely calling themselves "State" ---- as in "MICHIGAN". I published the addresses of the Registered Agents websites to prove to you that this is exactly what the Michigan General Jural Assembly is knowingly or unknowingly promoting --- a commercial corporation calling itself a "STATE"---- not the actual State at all. Be aware and be smart about this. There is a lot at stake.
JEFF: Anna Von Reitz is protecting the ability to continue THE THEFT via THE GREAT FRAUD, as people rotting in jail cells for driving without a driver's license can hardly be capable of challenging the corporation, "United States Inc," let alone living under a bridge, with no job, because they have no Social Security card, so no one will hire them, and even if they did find work, they have no bank account, and cannot get one, as I said, a person living under a bridge does not pose a threat to the corporation United States.
Anna's actual answer--- look at the above "discussion"---they are trying to make you fearful, and make you bow down to every little demand of their corporations--- and on the other hand, they are trying to convince that you have "rights" as a "US Citizen" that you demonstrably don't have while in that political status, and all the terrible things they describe "living under a bridge" etc. have only happened to who? People stupidly clinging to "US Citizenship"--- and not bothering to reclaim their birthright standing as American State Nationals or American State Citizens! Ask yourself ---if you had any "rights" as a US Citizen, much less constitutionally guaranteed rights, why are the US District Judges telling you right from the bench that you have no constitutional guarantees and that the constitution doesn't even enter in to their court??? Wake up!
JEFF: 2) Obfuscate
Anna is making the necessary path "Unintelligible, unclear, or obscured."
define Obfuscate:
Anna is "Obfuscating," making the path forward unclear and full of; doubt, worry, and concern, for personal well being.
Anna's actual answer: there is nothing "unclear" about what I am saying or what I am teaching. It is very simple. You have been kidnapped into a foreign jurisdiction of the law, where you have no rights and no constitutional guarantees and no property rights, either. You have been purposefully misidentified as a "US Citizen" --- a political status that is foreign to you. You have the option of reclaiming your birthright political status, but you must create a public claim to it by declaring your permanent homestead and domicile on the land and soil of your home State of the Union. There are thre simple documents that need to be recorded to do that. You also need to
be able to prove that you are the "John Michael Doe" whose actual birthday appears on the Birth Certificate they issued "in your Name" by providing two Witnesses who can connect you to the living baby born that day and time and place. There is nothing too difficult about this, except explaining it to knotheads and fools who cling to their chains and refuse to admit that they have been used and duped.
JEFF:
Anyone with reason knows that they are putting themselves in harms way when they "Repudiate their U.S. Citizenship."
Anna's actual answer: no, you get into trouble when you allow people to misrepresent you as anything but an American State Citizen. It's just the opposite of what these people are selling you. And as many of you have directly experienced--- all these bad things happen to who? Those who are clinging to "US Citizenship" as if it were a great thing. Why would you want the same political status as someone from Puerto Rico? That's what "United States Citizenship" means! Or, alternately, why would you want to subject yourself to the Holy Roman Empire? Most of you aren't even Catholic! That's what "Citizen of the United States" means. Wake up! Wake up! Wake up!
JEFF: Anna "Obfuscates" when she makes up a WHOLE BUNCH OF THINGS that you NEED TO DO, in order to exercise these God given rights, when all you really had to do was DUST OFF YOUR BILL of RIGHTS.
Anna's actual answer: as any US District Court Judge or Attorney will tell you, US Citizens have no "constitutional rights or guarantees" --- and never have had. Ask yourself, how anyone whose political status was created by the Constitutions, could at the same time be party to the Constitutions? They can't. The plain fact is that no kind of "US Citizen" -- neither Territorial nor Municipal -- has ever had any part of the Constitutions. They are subject to the Constitutions, not those protected by them.
JEFF: 3) Injure
define Injure:
Anna is attempting to "Injure" any fully motivated person who would move against the United States Inc corporation.
Anna's actual reply: I don't belong to nor do I suggest that anyone else belong to any commercial corporation or have anything to do with any commercial corporation nor do I advocate that any average person offer to do battle with any commercial corporation. "People" exist in a totally different realm of the law and different jurisdiction than "Persons" and all the injuries that people are suffering are a result of being misidentified as "persons". The "injury" occurs when we leave these corporations and stand as living people again. You must all understand that a "US citizen" of any stripe, literally belongs to either the British Crown Corp (United States Citizens) or to the Pope (Municipal Status). Is that where you want to be? Then, cling to your chains and make no objection to being called a "US Citizen".
It's your choice, after all.
JEFF:
It is difficult for injured prey to mount an efficient, intelligent, and calculated attack against a seemingly all powerful corporation, "United States Inc."
4) Deter
Anna is "Deterring" anyone from joining up with other Grand Jury Assembly Members whether it be the Michigan Grand Jury Assembly or any others.
Anna's actual answer--- I am leading people to actually accomplish what they want and need to accomplish, which is the restoration of their lawful government and the assembly of their actual State --- not a commercial franchise calling itself a "STATE".
The leaders of MGJA either don't know their butts from tin cups when it comes to assembling an actual State with actual People, or they are deliberately seeking to create another commercial corporation franchise.
How can anyone imagine that "US Citizens" --- like people from Puerto Rico can come here and populate our States "for us" and restore our government? No, what they would be doing is creating their own government to rule over ours. And we have no reason to support that, do we?
JEFF: Anna is sewing devision between Patriots who are looking for a solution.
Anna's actual answer: I already presented the solution to all this a long time ago, and it stands ready to implement for everyone with the brains to do it.
JEFF: And THE ANSWER is that our Founding American Forefathers knew that this day would come! They knew the enemy; in the Vatican, the enemy in England, and any other Royal Power that would seek to weaken or destroy the greatest threat to continued world domination would eventually come to steal America from We The People. Thus the Founding American Forefathers ensured that any Constitution coming after the First Constitution, would have to contain all of the original constitution. Although the Bill of Rights is the greatest weapon against the forces of Evil that our Founding Fathers & the Framers gave us to destroy the enemy even in the midst of the DARKEST LONG NIGHT. The weapon, the SILVER BULLET, has been discovered.
Anna's actual answer: US Citizens have no "Bill of Rights". If you doubt that, just continue to call yourself a "US Citizen" and neglect to reclaim your birthright political status and drive over the speed limit.
Our Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew that we have become so stupid that we can't even read the Constitutions they gave us and understand what they mean.
They would be utterly appalled to know that any American allowed themselves to be conscripted and mislabeled a "US Citizen" of any kind.
JEFF:
All you need to do is follow "The Handbook" as provided by the Michigan Jural Assembly. The Patriots operating the National Assembly and the Michigan Jural Assembly, many of them are former special forces Patriots who served long and hard to protect the people of this nation, and once they discovered the plot and how far the rabbit hole of death and suffering was dug, they set out to correct the wrongs and liberate We The People from the Evil of a foreign power that had overtaken us.
Anna's actual answer -- the Evil has already overtaken us. Any "Special Forces" are part of the problem and not the answer. We have been the victims of a foreign British-controlled Territorial United States Military operating on our shores (and worldwide) in the same capacity as the British Raj in India. This has been a problem of military ignorance, corruption, and usurpation against the Civilian Government since 1863.
Go back and read the very first "Executive Order" issued by Abraham Lincoln in 1863.
Then submit a letter to the Congressional Research Service or any of the Congressional Delegations and ask if the Reconstruction Acts have been repealed.
They will answer that only a few specific parts of the Reconstruction legislation have been repealed and the vast bulk of it remains in full force and effect.
So now you can see that our own dear military is up to its neck and is at least partly responsible for the problem in the first place---- and when they interfere like this and misrepresent the facts and try to make other people adopt "US Citizenship" akin to their own in ignorance or in guile, they are part of the problem, not the solution.
The "Evil" has already arrived.
It's called being a "presumed citizen of the United States". And if you don't want to be owned by the Queen or the Pope, it's high time you all woke up and smelled the java. I repeat--- "US Citizens" have no constitutional rights and no guarantees. The best they have are "Equal Civil Rights" provided at whim or not, by the members of the Municipal United States Congress acting under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17.
JEFF: All other Handbooks, like the one Anna stole and is selling on Amazon, will put you living under a bridge, in jail for 60 days at a time, without a bank account, without the ability to leave the country and gain RE-ENTRY.
However Bobby, I suspect you are also working for the Cabal. Because if you were listening on that National Assembly call when we were discussing Anna Von Reitz, you would have heard the testimony that both I and Others gave, revealing both Anna Von Reitz, and Soaring Spirit as being Crime Syndicate operatives to Obviate, Obfuscate, Deter, and Injure
Anna's actual reply: Have nothing more to do with the Michigan General Assembly or their mistakes. Pay no attention to their fear-mongering and their wrong assertions about "US Citizenship". All the bad things are happening to "US Citizens" --- not American State Nationals, not American State Citizens. The proof is in the pudding.
Please note the egregious and apparently deliberate lies they are spreading?
I "stole" the MGJA "Handbook" by writing a better one, article by article? And publishing it on my website as I wrote it?
Show me where I ever advised anyone to "renounce" their "US Citizenship"? I have told everyone to "expatriate" from it, which is a different thing entirely.
Show me where I ever said I was a "State of State" Judge? I am not confused about who I am, what my political status is, or anything else.
Why would I be working as a Hired Jurist for a Commercial Corporation?
Even their lies are ignorant.
Shake the dust from your weary feet, Bobby.
I never ever wanted to be responsible for organizing the States on top of everything else that sits on my plate, but here we are, facing up to that.
The American States Assembly will be organizing actual geographically defined States of the Union. Those who are interested in restoring their lawful government and living their lives as Lawful People, are invited to assist in this great endeavor. It should be understood that: (1) the actual States are unincorporated entities; (2) the actual States have physical borders; (3) the actual States are populated by People who are protected by the Constitutions; (4) the People are all either American State Nationals (who have no obligation to serve the government) or American State Citizens (who agree to serve as Jurors or in other capacities as needed).
The States have nothing to do with any State of States, nor do they have anything to do with any commercial corporation calling itself a "State" or a "STATE".
Finally, Bobby, I want you to notice who they quote-- people who weren't even at the interview that I gave the Southern Poverty Law Center, people who sought to misrepresent what I was saying and what I have been saying for years.
So who are they "representing"? And what?
(pretty obvious that Jeff is a govt agent/or hopeless fool)
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
Points of View, Terms of Art, and Where Pedal Meets Metal
I already explained how all Federal Code, Titles, Acts, etc., are written from the Federal Perspective --- from their Point of View, not ours.
That's how we become described as "non-resident aliens" in their IRS Code.
This is also how "United States Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States" can be described by them as "Domestic Terrorists" --- because such Legal Persons are "domestic" with respect to the Federal Government.
These same Legal Persons are foreign with respect to us. We have to call them "Foreign Terrorists" when US Citizens engage in activities meant to scare, intimidate, or coerce us.
In the same way, from their perspective, it's okay to call a "State of State" a "STATE". They aren't really lying, though they are promoting confusion. From their point of view, a "State of State" is a "State" --- but not from ours.
We have already encountered this particular confusion when we discussed the "Confederate States" --- both North and South --- which were in fact Federal States of States, and not "States" in the sense that we think of a "State" at all.
To avoid the facts and avoid giving the power of our government back to the civilians it belongs to, the British-controlled military government that has ruled here since 1863, is promoting just that kind of confusion again.
We figured out that a "state of state" is not a State, so now they are trying to confuse us by claiming that a "STATE" is the same as a "State" --- but it's not.
Anything that appears in all capital letters, for example, "MICHIGAN", is announcing to the world that it is in fact a corporation--- and a particular kind of corporation, too: a Municipal Government Corporation, operated by the Holy See and the Holy Roman Empire.
Our physically defined States of the Union are not corporations of any kind.
Our physically defined States of the Union are unincorporated entities.
Our States are actual, factual, located-in-space.
Confederate "States" meaning Federal States, are not, and neither are any Territorial or Municipal "States". All such "States" are "inchoate"--- non-physical, legal fictions. They are "States of States" being called "States" within the Federal Government system.
So to avoid all this confusion, just cut to the chase: are you talking about incorporated entities or unincorporated entities?
I am talking about unincorporated States.
When I talk about "States of the Union" I am not talking about the "Federal Union" of States of States that fought in the Civil War.
I am talking about the actual unincorporated States that belong to The United States and which are members of The United States of America --- an unincorporated Federation of States.
So that's how you cut through all the baloney: is it incorporated?
If so, it is not a "State" for our purposes.
The Federales can call their States of States an "Onion" for all I care. The bottom line is -- they are talking about incorporated entities, and I am not.
If we are talking about an unincorporated State called "Wisconsin", that's my Home State, where I was born.
If we are talking about an incorporated "State" called "Wisconsin", in the current context, that's a foreign British-controlled commercial corporation.
If we are talking about an incorporated "STATE" called "MICHIGAN", that's a foreign Papist-controlled commercial corporation.
The fail-safe, fool-proof question is: incorporated or unincorporated?
Now, I am of the opinion that once we get our States Assembled, we have grievances to settle against the British Monarch and the Pope. They have been promoting a "similar names deceit" and constructive fraud by promoting this confusion between the actual and factual States and their commercial corporation franchises.
We are owed a "lawful conversion" of all our purloined assets, including respect for our copyrights and Good Names.
Meantime, we keep our noses to the grindstone and our wits about us. Their "States" are not our "States" and the difference is: our States are not incorporated entities.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
Ours v. Theirs
Even today, among sincere patriots, there are many misunderstandings.
I had one such man who has devoted his life to restoring the lawful government owed to the people of this country describe the Federal Constitutions as our "Founding Documents".
They aren't our Founding Documents. They weren't even anticipated when our Founding Documents were forged.
The Federal Constitutions establish the Federal Government and our States are Parties to those agreements, but no, folks, the Federal Constitutions --- all three of them --- were lucky to be included as Organic Law in this country.
The Constitutions govern national trusts and commercial services contracts. They stipulate which organizations are supposed to provide which services. They establish the form and structure of the Federal, Territorial, and Municipal Governments as they pertain to us. They limit the Federal Government. They provide guarantees to our States and to us. And that's about it.
As things stand, the trusts have been held in contempt by the British Monarch and the Pope, and the services have been totally ramrodded.
The Hired Help has been running the roost, writing up contracts for themselves, charging whatever they wanted against our credit under conditions of fraud and under color of law.
And who are the Hired Help? The "United States Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States".
These are two groups of foreign operatives on our shores, one British (United States Citizens) and one Papist (Citizens of the United States). Their political status is created and defined under Article 1, Section 2 and Article I, Section 3.
They are our employees and we are their employers. Never forget it again.
The Constitutions are their "Founding Documents"---- not ours.
We have every reason and right to form up our actual State Assemblies and hold the Queen and the Pope feet first to the fire for Gross Breach of Trust and for Fraud and many other crimes against the living people of this country.
We, the People, who are the actual population of the geographically defined States, can enforce the Constitutions and we need to do so without any further debate.
In view of the way we have been dis-served by the Queen and the Popes, we have every right to refuse them any further assumption of contract. Mr. Trump has a 30 day quid pro quo and that's all anyone has at this point.
They want us to respect the Constitutions and pay the bills, but they don't want to live in accord with and respect the Constitutions --- nor do they show the least little bit of concern for their actual employers.
They, the Hired Help, want to lord it over us and pretend that we are employees, just like they are employees---- except that we are considered "volunteers" who don't get paid for our services: slaves and indentured servants.
The tail has been wagging the dog so long that they, the tail, have forgotten that there is a dog, and tragically enough, there are even many Americans who have been asleep and thought so, too.
Well, here's a big ray of sunshine up their skirts. We are back. In force. On the land and soil of the American States. We know who we are. We know who they are. And the whole world knows what they owe us.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·
Dear Mr. Trump,
On this 6th day of March in the year 2019, we wish to convey our sympathy and support against the outrageous and unauthorized actions of the Municipal United States Congress. Feel free to exercise your options.
We realize that you are not responsible for their Bad Behavior and we are forwarding our Displeasure to those who are responsible for THEM.
We would like to see a directive go out to the United States Military to properly inform all members that just because they signed up to act as "United States Citizens" as a condition of receiving a paycheck, the rest of us are under no such obligation and must be left alone, not addressed, not spied on, not harassed, coerced, or made subject to any racketeering or unjust demand at all --- ever, with regard to our choice of political status or the exercise of our rights and guarantees, including our exemptions.
We have a nasty DOD-UN CORP-FBI and other assorted Municipal Alphabet Soup group being run out of Michigan calling itself the "Michigan General Jural Assembly" but in fact they are misrepresenting themselves as a lawful State Jural Assembly and are apparently aiming to set up a Municipal Corporation merely named after the actual State---instead.
A "Bait and Switch" Operation.
We deduce this from the fact that their leadership all claims "United States Citizenship" or "Citizenship of the United States" and they continue to promote the idea that such "Citizens" have Constitutional rights and guarantees and tell people that they can retain such citizenship obligations at the same time that they are purportedly acting as one of our State Jural Assemblies.
Our States do not now nor have they ever allowed Dual Citizenship.
We protest against all of these continuing "similar names deceits" and against all of these various foreign corporate enterprises seeking to impersonate our actual States while being guests upon our shores.
We ask for your assistance in properly informing these groups and individuals --- some of whom may be well-meaning patriots who are simply confused, some of whom are no doubt acting as Undeclared Foreign Agents.
Among all the other Disinformation that supporters of this group are spreading is the idea that the "FBI" has approached me and asked me questions and otherwise bullied me. This is not true, nor should it be. As a Subcontractor of a Subcontractor, the FBI has no authority to address me and neither does the IRS or any other Municipal Agency.
We wish for your Administration to make it completely clear that none of these contractors are to investigate, meddle with, contact, address, coerce, lie to, attempt to interfere with, co-opt, misdirect, or harm any American who is claiming their lawful birthright political status as an American State National or American State Citizen of any of the now-fifty States.
We wish for all Military Contractors to be fully advised.
We are the lawful Civilian Government of this country and we are fed up with the "Service".
Any service organization wishing to get a contract or keep one needs to stop playing games and do their actual jobs--- jobs which do not include running co-option schemes and psychological warfare operations on the People of this country.
We request and require the full and explicit compliance of all military personnel, including subcontractors, to cease and desist all operations aimed at destabilizing, thwarting, impersonating, co-opting, misinforming, threatening, bullying, or otherwise interfering with our State Assemblies or mis-addressing our Lawful Persons.
We also request and require that they cease and desist all operations seeking to establish commercial corporations "in our names" or the names of our States.
This is an unwelcome, unnecessary, fraudulent usurpation against the actual States and People of this country.
We are quite competent and capable of issuing our own charters and will do so -- an eventuality which is not the business of any Territorial or Municipal Citizen, nor any Federal Agent, Agency, Subcontractor, or Department.
Thank you for your service and patience in the midst of such injustice.
Anna Maria
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·
The Continuing Debacle and The Remnant
Most Beloved Francis,
We wish to express our Extreme Displeasure:
The US Municipal "Congress" is out of control. They may be out of their minds, too.
They can't be allowed to abuse bankruptcy and just continue merrily on.
You know this.
No doubt Cardinal Parolin and the others know this, too---whether or not they want to admit it. The entire world is watching and knows the score, knows what was done, by whom, to whom.
The Subcontractors are even worse, if possible. All these bogus "Federal" Agencies are nothing but a huge expense and a nuisance. They create trouble out of thin air just to give themselves something to do--- and then ignore all the work that they are supposed to be doing.
The FBI, DOJ, BATF, FEMA, IRS, CIA, et alia --- they are all rampaging around on our shores causing trouble, mis-addressing Lawful Persons, staging all sorts of stupid military "operations", trying to confuse everyone with deceitful use of language, getting ready to stage a "civil war" on our shores, the entire point of which is to kill us, their Employers.
The Holy Roman Empire needs to stand down and assist the Lawful Government of this country. What should have happened in 1865 needs to happen now.
The Apocalypse has happened and is ongoing.
The Great Tribulation has been paid.
The Remnant has returned.
Do the right thing.
Anna Maria
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
17 hrs ·
For All The Jural Assemblies - 43 Legal Persons
Let's review:
There are exactly three (3) branches that make up the American Government:
1. The United States -- an unincorporated union of soil jurisdiction republican states which are geographically defined and populated by living people. This is our National Jurisdiction. Founded July 1, published July 4, 1776.
2. The United States of America -- an unincorporated federation of land and sea international jurisdiction States which are geographically defined and populated by Lawful Persons on the land and inhabited by Legal Persons on the sea. This is our International Jurisdiction. Founded September 9, 1776.
3. the States of America -- an unincorporated confederation of inchoate, non-physical States of States that operate in the global and municipal realm of commerce inhabited by Legal PERSONS in the Jurisdiction of the Air. This is our Global Jurisdiction. Founded March 1, 1781.
This is our government founded before and apart from any Federal Government.
As we also discussed, the Constitutions impacted only the States of America portion of our government, and had the effect of power-sharing some of the former functions of the States of America with two foreign governments --- Britain and the Holy Roman Empire, acting under solemn trust agreements.
We also learned that the interface between Lawful Persons and Legal Persons is in the International Jurisdiction, and that the boundary between Lawful Persons on the land and Legal Persons on the Sea is an invisible barrier called "the bar" or "the corporate veil". This is in a legal sense, the "veil" between life and death, as Lawful Persons are deemed to be alive, and Legal Persons are deemed to be fictional and dead.
We have dealt at some length with the fact that all Lawful Persons are unincorporated. We have also observed that Lawful Persons can be "corporate" though not "incorporated" ---- for example, an unincorporated Mom and Pop business called "Bill's Bicycle Shop" is "corporate" but not incorporated.
All Lawful Persons everywhere stand on the living side of the corporate veil and on the land and soil of their respective countries.
Now we come to the obverse, the mirror image, of the Lawful Person --- the Legal Persons inhabiting the international jurisdiction of the sea and the airy realms of the global municipal jurisdiction.
Legal Persons can be Corporate or Incorporated, but they are never totally unincorporated. They always derive their "personhood" from some other entity and have no basis to exist on their own.
The prior sentence should be underlined and properly taken note of.
Lawful Persons and the people they represent have a quality of independent being that Legal Persons always lack.
A Legal Person does not exist on land, except as a temporary sojourner called an "inhabitant" and they are not considered to be part of the "population" because they are not one of the "people".
The realm in which they operate-- the work they do for the most part-- obligates them to operate in the reduced capacity of a "thing", a dead legal fiction, and it also obligates them to live under either the international jurisdiction of the sea and its laws, or the global jurisdiction of the air and its commercial laws.
Land Law and National Law (Soil Jurisdiction Law) do not apply to Legal Persons.
Statutes, Codes, and Regulations apply to Legal Persons.
A statute is not a law. It is evidence of a law and that law is the "law" of private contract.
One becomes a Legal Person instead of a Lawful Person by subjecting oneself to a foreign sovereign, by enfranchising oneself to a commercial corporation, by registering oneself as property of a commercial corporation, or by other acts creating a presumption of obligation to act in the capacity of a Legal Person.
A Lawful Person can only be "converted" into a Legal Person as a result of such a private contract.
Obviously, this could be an employment contract, as when one accepts a Federal Civil Service job or a job in the US Military. It could be an application for political asylum "in the United States", or an application for unearned Federal Welfare benefits, an application for a Driver License, a US (as opposed to USA) passport, or a voter registration. It could in some instances also be a contractual condition by birth, as when someone is born in Puerto Rico or Washington, DC. Or, such an obligation could arise as the result of incorporating a business as a United States commercial corporation.
For insight into the current situation, we are all born as Lawful Persons on the land and soil of our respective States, and we are supposed to be protected by the most sacred bonds of international trust and treaty and commercial obligation ---- but a ruse and an excuse has been used to "pretend" that you are a Legal Person instead, and resultingly, owed none of the protections of these treaties, trusts, and commercial contracts.
The ruse goes back to the Civil War and the Federal Government's practice of calling "States of States" --- commercial corporations --- "States", as in "Confederate States". They even go so far as to call it "The War Between the States" ---- but no actual States were involved.
All the entities involved in the so-called American Civil War, both North and South, were commercial corporations --- States of States, and whether they knew it or not, all those engaged in that horrific conflict were acting as Legal Persons.
Those who have undertaken this giant fraud against the People of this country have pretended that those long-vanquished commercial corporations were in fact our States, but they were not. They have also pretended that we, a 150 years later, are still combatants acting as Legal Persons and Mercenaries of either the States of America or the Confederate States of America.
Either way, it's total baloney and it part of what we have to address as actual State Assemblies today.
As a result of the foregoing false presumptions being held against us at birth, the United States Military controlled by the British Territorial United States Government has made sure that a false record of assumed contract has been created for each and every one of us: the Birth Certificate.
This is the first and primary evidence against us, suggesting that we are from birth "United States Citizens" or rather, that we were "volunteered" into that political status by our unwary Mothers. However, in order to make this legal the perpetrators also had to record the actual event of your birth, so that both you actual birthday and the birthdate of the Legal Person they created in your name appear on the same document, giving evidence of an unconscionable contract.
You were only a few days or weeks old when this "unlawful conversion" of your political status from Lawful Person to Legal Person took place.
You could not possibly engage in any such assumption of contractual obligation on your own, so your Mother was coerced under conditions of non-disclosure and color of law to do it "for" you.
After that, a number of adhesion contracts were foisted off on you, all under color of law, all without full disclosure.
You were told that you had to sign up for a Social Security Account and get a Social Security Number before you could have a job. (True only if you were seeking Federal Employment.)
You were told that you had to "register" to Vote, but you weren't told that doing so would surrender all your labor and private property rights to the commercial corporation hosting those elections.
You were told that you had to similarly "register" your "vehicle" and get a Driver License, too.
And so on and on. These various applications and registrations -- all induced under color of law and threat of force as adhesion contracts-- are added to the Birth Certificate information to create evidence that you are voluntarily contracting with these commercial corporations and choosing to live your life as a Legal Person instead of as a Lawful Person.
Legal Persons are dead, legal fiction entities. They have no rights or guarantees.
When you, a Lawful American State National or American State Citizen go out and "cross the bar" into the International Jurisdiction of the Sea, the British Monarch is obligated to protect you, but a Legal Person has no such protections.
When you, a Lawful American State National or American State Citizen create a commercial corporation to do business for you in the realm of commerce, the Pope is obligated to protect that, too, but a Legal Person has no such claim upon the Holy Roman Empire.
People and their Lawful Persons are born. Persons are birthed.
People have their genesis in physical actuality, in land and soil and water.
Persons have their genesis in the realm of thought, office, and employment.
People are created by the union of flesh and the mystery of creation.
Persons are created by statutes, which are contracts, by applications, registrations, enfranchisements, and so on.
People live on the land and soil.
Persons sail on the sea and in the air.
If you read the Federal Constitutions you will see the statute (contract) creating Federal Legal Persons known as "United States Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States" in Article 1, Sections 2 and 3, respectively.
These Legal Persons are created when someone accepts employment from the Federal Government, or when one "volunteers" to serve the Federal Government in some capacity --- like "Withholding Agent" or "Voter".
These Legal Persons, like all other Legal Persons, are not Parties to the Federal Constitutions and are not able to access their protections and guarantees.
Rather, they are subject to the Federal Constitutions, meaning that they must honor and obey and fulfill and perform the duties and responsibilities that go along with the right to exercise the delegated Powers of the People of the land jurisdiction States.
You can see now how "redefining" our Lawful Persons as Legal Persons strips us of protections and guarantees and services and assets we are owed and gives us nothing in return.
You can also see that as Lawful Persons operate on the land and soil, and Legal Persons operate in the sea and air, that redefining you as a Legal Person results in kidnapping you from your original birthright jurisdiction on the land and soil and trafficking you into a foreign jurisdiction of the law without your knowledge or consent.
You can also see that this is happening right under the noses of your own employees and the international trustees, both the Queen and the Pope, who are under obligation to protect you, and that they are excusing both their action and inaction by "mistaking on purpose" the difference between the Legal Persons and the Confederation of States of States that took part in the Civil War and the People populating the actual States of this country then and now.
The fraud against us has been institutionalized over the past hundred years and those operating it have grown fat on the theft of our assets, the plundering of our credit, and the sale of our labor. And it all hinges on this unlawful conversion of our Lawful Persons into Legal Persons and this false pretense that Confederation "States of States" --commercial corporations-- are the same as our physical States of the Union.
The Queen, the Pope, the various Presidents, the members of Congress, the US Military and other parties are all guilty of Gross Breach of Trust, conspiracy against the Constitutions, and worse. This has all been practiced against us under color of law and conditions of non-disclosure, fraud, and deceit.
The division between Lawful Persons and Legal Persons also results in the necessity of two court systems and two completely different sets of law.
Our Lawful Persons are owed American Common Law, Public Land Law, and Organic Law. We are now in the process of fully restoring our Courts to provide the services we need for ourselves and to enforce the Public Law, including the Constitutions.
Legal Persons function solely under Statutes, Codes, and Regulations, all forming a type of private law based on private contracts with other Legal Persons, including commercial corporations.
Legal Persons are limited to functioning in the jurisdiction of the sea and the air, with the result that such legal fiction entities can only create more legal fiction entities as franchises owned by the same foreign sovereignty that claims ownership of the Legal Persons.
Lawful Persons can issue charters to both corporate and incorporated entities and do so independently.
To overcome the legal presumption that you are voluntarily choosing to act and live as a Legal Person and to regain protections owed to your Lawful Person and to assert your identity as one of the People and to operate as such, it is necessary to create superior evidence rebutting their evidence to the contrary.
Creating the superior evidence that you are choosing to act as a Lawful Person is the entire purpose of creating and recording the paperwork which The Living Law Firm has developed.
Although you might choose to work for the Federal Government in some capacity during your lifetime, you should be aware that doing so obligates you to operate as a Legal Person and deprives you of rights and saddles you with duties that you would not have otherwise.
It is also important to know that upon severance or retirement from such duties, it is necessary to give your former employers Notice that you are leaving Federal Service and returning to your permanent home and domicile on the land and soil of your State. This should be done in a formal but simple way, just stating the facts, sent to your former federal employer and to the Social Security Administration or Military Pension Office, etc., via Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested.
This precludes any possible misunderstanding or pretense on their part that you are continuing to serve as a Legal Person in any quasi-military volunteer status.
There should be no onus for Federal Service or United States Citizenship or Citizenship of the United States. Quite the contrary. It is a largely thankless and subordinate political status of indentured servitude, sometimes amounting to outright slavery, and involving many duties and responsibilities and sacrifices. Some grave injustices have been inflicted on United States Citizens and Citizens of the United States.
This, too, is part of what needs to be redressed.
Not only have we been left uninformed, and deliberately misidentified and defrauded, but our employees have also been left without critical information and abused. Worst of all, our sons and daughters have been sacrificed as cheap mercenaries in wars for profit--- while being led to believe that it was all about defending our country.
All of this needs to stop, and all of this can be stopped once the actual American People stand up, shake off the dust and the lies, and assume their duty posts as American State Nationals and American State Citizens --- Lawful Persons owed every jot of the Constitutions and Treaties.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
For All The Jural Assemblies - 44 Legal Persons and Territorial Courts
As we learned when we first discussed the international jurisdiction of the States, there are no living people in international jurisdiction --- only Lawful Persons on the land and Legal Persons on the sea.
All Persons are legal fictions, varying only in the degree of their separation from the actual world and the jurisdiction in which they operate.
Directly across the Bar from our Lawful Persons operating on the international jurisdiction of the land, are Legal Persons operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
The international jurisdiction of the sea, especially when it overlaps onto the land, is also known as "Territorial Jurisdiction" and the Legal Persons occupying this jurisdiction may be referred to in some old law books as "Territorials".
Legal Persons all operate under systems of law known as Codes, Statutes, and Regulations.
All transactions and interactions are accomplished by contracts, both public and private, and those Legal Persons engaged in carrying on business in the international jurisdiction of the sea act as employees of corporations or officials representing corporations and/or the various governments chartering the corporations.
This particular jurisdiction has long been the realm of the British Monarchs who have policed and dominated it for centuries. It should not surprise us, then, that a majority of those connected to this jurisdiction follow British nomenclature and traditions, one of which is the tradition of holding offices as trusts.
A trust requires a donor, a holder or trustee, and a beneficiary. In the British system of things, the Queen acts as the donor, the recipient of her office or commission acts as the holder/trustee, and at the end of the day, the office or commission granted returns to the Queen, her heirs or successors.
The office holder in such a grantor system receives a "title" --- a label designating exactly what their rank and responsibility is. This is again a reference to the office being held as a trust, where the office holder holds the liability and duty (the legal title) and the Queen holds the benefit (the equitable title).
The title "Mister" indicates that the person being addressed is a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service. It may also be applied to a Midshipman in the Queen's Navy. So this one title, "Mister", can refer to someone engaged in international trade, or to a junior officer in the navy, depending on the context in which it is used.
The use of this term to address any man of legal age has become commonplace in this country, though obviously, it should not be. Misapplying it to average Americans creates the basis for legal presumptions that are inappropriate and disadvantageous to those Americans who appear to accept the title of "Mister" or "Missus" (a Mister's wife) or "Miss" (a Mister's spinster daughter).
The title "Esquire" indicates that the person being addressed is working as a Squire, the lowest rank of the British Nobility, from which they can aspire to become a Knight, a Lord, or even higher dignitary.
Each and every one of these titles and offices is a separate Legal Person, quite apart from the Legal Person bearing the title.
These titles are foreign to America and Americans, however, because we contracted to receive certain stipulated services from the British Government they have gradually insinuated themselves upon our shores.
Make no mistake, however, that clueless as Americans may be, our British counterparts are fully aware that when they call you "Mister" or "Missus" or "Miss" they are attaching a title to you--- and along with the title go the responsibilities and duties associated with it, all owed to the Queen.
By using these titles to address you they are establishing the contractual basis of prosecuting you under maritime or admiralty law. If you call someone "Mister" and he answers to it, that is "probable cause" to assume that he is operating in a capacity subject to the Queen.
The most egregious example of this occurs when millions of Americans fill out 1040 Forms and claim under penalty of perjury that they are acting as "Withholding Agents" --- that is, as Warrant Officers in the British Merchant Marine Service. These innocent people have no idea what a "Withholding Agent" is, much less the jurisdiction in which a Withholding Agent functions, but they have mistakenly acted as a Legal Person working as an unpaid volunteer of a foreign (British) government, which then obligates them to perform according to the standards of the job.
Our Forefathers were not as ignorant as we are today and saw the manner in which this application of titles to living people could be misused and how the benefits and privileges of some titles, such as "Esquire" could become the basis for conflict of interest and split loyalties, so they banned their use on our shores, but could not ban their use in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
What does all this mean for us as members of American State Jural Assemblies?
First and foremost it means that we must be able to distinguish the difference between our courts and their courts, their law and our law, their officers and our officials, their titles and our public offices.
We do not use a class system nor do we grant or use titles. Esquires are not allowed in our courts. Our courts function on self-representation aided by Lawful Counsel; this means that our Lawyers do not speak for us. We speak for ourselves with their assistance and guidance with respect to such issues as prior case law and standards of evidence.
In our courts, the only time that a lawyer is allowed to speak for anyone is when the Public Prosecutor presents a murder case in behalf of the victim or if someone has been harmed to the point that they cannot physically or mentally present their own case.
We do not have "petit juries" which use six jurors to decide cases in municipal courts. All our juries require twelve Jurors, including Grand Juries. Likewise, we maintain the effort to establish peerage as much as possible when selecting jury panels. Workmen should sit in judgement of workmen and academics should sit in judgement of academics, and so on, so as to promote a fair and insightful outcome.
We do not have Bailiffs, we have Bondsmen.
Our Justices do not swear any oath. They accept their elected Public Office as a Public Trust owed to the People of their State in front of Witnesses, but there is no talk of swearing (prohibited by the Bible-based land law) and no statements such as "so help me, God" appear in soil or land jurisdiction courts.
Though most of our Forefathers were earnest Christians, they understood that the only way to preserve religious freedom for themselves, was to preserve religious freedom for everyone. Thus, they adopted the separation of Church and State.
Even though we may have Chaplains assigned to serve our Assemblies and even though they may offer opening prayers and convocations, when the business meeting kicks in, and we begin to act for the People of our States, we understand that we are acting to the best of our ability to protect the rights and security of everyone concerned without religious, racial or political bias.
Our Justices do not decide the law or the facts of any case. That is left to the members of each jury. The role of the Justice is to provide a level playing field and to enforce the rules of evidence; once the jury has reached a decision, it is the duty of the Justice to "pronounce" the sentence for the Public Record and it is the Sheriff's duty to execute the sentence.
Our courts are based upon Local Law (soil jurisdiction) and Public Laws (land jurisdiction) that are enrolled in the Public Record as General Assembly Session Laws.
All such laws are subject to jury nullification.
If our Assemblies adopt a law that is unfair, unwieldy, or inappropriate, any jury in our system of law can nullify it and state the reasons why, whereupon it is held in abeyance as if it never existed and returned to the State General Assembly for correction or repeal. In this way the people maintain direct control over the standards of law that are being applied to them and weed out any laws that are ill-conceived or unfair.
This precious process of jury nullification also provides a natural curb on the endless proliferation of new laws poking into every corner of our lives.
Our law is simple, draconian, and based on the Ten Commandments. There has to be a specific Injured Party claiming injury to himself or to his property.
There is no such thing as a "thought crime" or a "hate crime" until and unless it results in verifiable harm and then it is addressed in terms of what the actual harm is.
The law of the Legal Persons, by comparison, is endlessly complex, subtle, and based on Codes and Maxims that rule the law of contracts.
No doubt this is striking a cord with those familiar with the foreign maritime and admiralty court system of the Legal Persons functioning in Territorial (International Jurisdiction of the Sea) Jurisdiction.
Their laws are enacted instead of being enrolled and they take the form of enumerated Codes and Statutes and Regulations adopted by the Territorial United States Congress and the Territorial State of State Legislatures.
There is no end to the number of these Codes, Statutes, and Regulations that can be adopted and no process of jury nullification to weed them out, with the result that the proliferation of these private "laws" grows with cancerous ferocity and the burden and cost of enforcing them increases exponentially.
The Territorial and Admiralty Courts operated by and for the use of Legal Persons are operated by Bar Attorneys (Esquires) and presided over by Judges who act as Hired Jurist Referees and Administrators. These courts make no attempt to address the law or the facts of any case and focus instead on whether or not a contract exists, and if a duty owed under that contract was dishonored. They are all run as "Nisi Prius" Courts, that is, Contract Courts for Hire.
Legal Persons have no Natural nor Unalienable Rights so issues pertaining to claims of such rights and arguments based on constitutional guarantees do not apply to them nor enter into their courts. At most, Legal Persons may ask for "Equal Civil Rights" -- which may be provided or denied upon the discretion of the Judge.
Legal Persons, unless they have a degree in law, are considered incompetent and must be "represented" by a Bar Attorney, who will speak for them both in court and privately under Power of Attorney, which basically grants him or her the right to act as your Proxy and cut deals in your behalf. Obviously, this is a position of Private Trust under contract that can be greatly abused and often is.
The form of law used by these courts is private, also.
Statutes, Rules, Codes, Public Policies, Resolutions, and Regulations are not law, they are evidence of law, and each one represents a contract that Legal Persons are bound to. If you are acting as a Legal Person and operating in Territorial Jurisdiction (International Jurisdiction of the Sea) you are presumed to know and obey all such obligations and to honor all contracts.
Of course, the proliferation of 80 million such "laws" makes it impossible for anyone to know much less enforce them, and instead of providing any matrix for the pursuit of justice or order, such a system devolves into an excuse for raising revenues through fines and stealing property via arbitrary asset seizures.
You may readily recognize the Territorial Courts of the Legal Persons by their use of Statutes at the State (of State) level and use of Federal Code at the Federal level.
They may also use Military Code. They often deceptively refer to this as "COMMON LAW" --- as in "Military Common Law" --- which is obviously not the Common Law owed to the American People and not any standard that should ever be applied to a civilian Lawful Person.
As our American State Jural Assemblies and our People's Courts have ceased to function, more and more of our People have been misidentified as Legal Persons and held to these foreign standards of law and railroaded into these foreign courts.
The plain fact is that we don't belong in their courts and they don't belong in ours. Lawful Persons exist in an entirely different and separate jurisdiction apart from Legal Persons and operate under different standards and conventions, but the lack of Lawful Courts and the temptation to profit from this circumstance by guile has led to the present morass.
As we begin the long overdue process of restoring our Lawful Courts we have the option to handle conflicts and controversies via private binding arbitration and may assert our standing as Lawful People and request such arbitration whenever any complaint is brought against us in a Legal Court setting.
Private arbitration should be used as a stop-gap measure until our own courts are up and functioning again.
In all this bear in mind that our courts are not their courts and vice versa. Our laws, except for the Constitutions, do not apply to them --and their laws do not apply to us.
A large part of the work set before the State Jural Assemblies is to set up and convene your own State Court System for the Lawful People returning to the land and soil jurisdiction of your State. At first this will be a daunting task as you struggle to sort things out and research the history of your State, but ultimately, the rewards of freedom and self-determination which follow from this work are the fruits of your labor and the fulfillment of your heritage.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
About passports being commercial, Anna says
Quote:
a US (as opposed to USA) passport, or a voter registration.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
Cheat Sheet to End Confusion
1. The United States is the Proper Name of the Union of republican soil jurisdiction states, representing our combined National Jurisdiction
2. The United States of America is the Proper Name of the Federation of land jurisdiction States, representing our combined International Jurisdiction.
3. the States of America is the Proper Name of the Confederation of States of States -- commercial corporations chartered by the States of the Federation, representing our combined Global Jurisdiction.
4. the United States of America is the Proper Name of the British-controlled Territorial Branch of the Federal Government and the Territorial United States.
5. the United States is the Proper Name of the Holy Roman Empire-controlled Municipal Branch of the Federal Government and the Municipal United States.
You can now clearly see all the opportunities for deceptive word-play that have been possible with this situation and why so many people have been confused.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
You were told that you had to sign up for a Social Security Account and get a Social Security Number before you could have a job. (True only if you were seeking Federal Employment.)
You were told that you had to "register" to Vote, but you weren't told that doing so would surrender all your labor and private property rights to the commercial corporation hosting those elections.
You were told that you had to similarly "register" your "vehicle" and get a Driver License, too.
And so on and on. These various applications and registrations -- all induced under color of law and threat of force as adhesion contracts-- are added to the Birth Certificate information to create evidence that you are voluntarily contracting with these commercial corporations and choosing to live your life as a Legal Person instead of as a Lawful Person.
Does Anna explain how to travel in your private car without a Driver’s License or “vehicle” registration when you convert from U.S. Citizen to American State National? I haven’t seen any place she offers any advice. Traveling with a private or no plate likely will result in a ticket and your car being towed. Even if you prevail in court you will still be stuck with the tow bill and likely stopped and towed again in the future. If you have a domestic address the judge will say you are a “resident” and subject to his statutes.
There was a case in Kansas where the man was stopped for no registration or Driver’s License. He was ticketed and his car was towed. The judge ruled he didn’t need a licensce or registration because he wasn’t a resident which he proved by receiving his mail c/o an address rather than at his “residence”. The cops stated they will continue to ticket him and tow his car if he contiues to travel without registration and a license because the law says he must have a license and registration.
Most of us can’t afford repeated tow bills and the inconvenience of being houled into court.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
monty
Does Anna explain how to travel in your private car without a Driver’s License or “vehicle” registration when you convert from U.S. Citizen to American State National? I haven’t seen any place she offers any advice. Traveling with a private or no plate likely will result in a ticket and your car being towed. Even if you prevail in court you will still be stuck with the tow bill and likely stopped and towed again in the future. If you have a domestic address the judge will say you are a “resident” and subject to his statutes.
There was a case in Kansas where the man was stopped for no registration or Driver’s License. He was ticketed and his car was towed. The judge ruled he didn’t need a licensce or registration because he wasn’t a resident which he proved by receiving his mail c/o an address rather than at his “residence”. The cops stated they will continue to ticket him and tow his car if he contiues to travel without registration and a license because the law says he must have a license and registration.
Most of us can’t afford repeated tow bills and the inconvenience of being houled into court.
Well I do know that we all sign over power of attorney to the State of xxx and give them title to the car. They own the car. So you have to take back possession of the car.
Once that is done I think you can make a claim against any false enforcement of a non-existing contract.
There was a guy in California who drove for years without plates and a license. I'm pretty sure Richard McDonald also travelled.
McDonald said you had to find courts that enforced common law in State jurisdiction.
The best solution is very problematic, having our own common law courts for real State National's. Like how do you enforce your law on their private law, when they have all the guns and all the prisons.
It is almost like living in the twilight zone where the what we thought was the law is just Walmart law and the real law is laughed at by the people who should be in jail.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Well I do know that we all sign over power of attorney to the State of xxx and give them title to the car. They own the car. So you have to take back possession of the car.
Once that is done I think you can make a claim against any false enforcement of a non-existing contract.
There was a guy in California who drove for years without plates and a license. I'm pretty sure Richard McDonald also travelled.
McDonald said you had to find courts that enforced common law in State jurisdiction.
The best solution is very problematic, having our own common law courts for real State National's. Like how do you enforce your law on their private law, when they have all the guns and all the prisons.
It is almost like living in the twilight zone where the what we thought was the law is just Walmart law and the real law is laughed at by the people who should be in jail.
This guy claims he recently had his no license/noregistration case dismissed in Las Vegas.
https://m.facebook.com/Capt.Karl/pos...05919185094736
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
Open Challenge
Many years ago, in North Carolina, I was sitting at a table in front of an open window looking out onto a covered veranda and gardens beyond.
My companion was a retired Judge from South Carolina, who was in his nineties and still sharp as a tack. He drank "coffee" made from dried dandelion roots.
It may strike people as odd, but the Civil War wasn't really so long ago. My Grandfather was born during the Civil War, and this man, old enough to have been my Grandfather, was born twenty-five years after it ended. For him as a child growing up, the wounds and events were still fresh. His Grandparents lived through it. One of his Grandfathers died in it. His Father remembered the Carpetbagger Era that followed.
Our conversation that day and for several days following was meandering and thoughtful as he paged through his memories, often pausing to pick and choose his words as well as his topics. He was a careful, methodical, logical man with a shrewd view of the world well-honed from fifty years on the bench.
At one point, he stopped and shot me a glance and said, "You don't like lawyers much, do you?" And then he tilted back his head and looked at the ceiling and said, "I can't much blame you, but remember--- it's the sins you commit that you aren't even aware of that damn you. Pray to be forgiven for them."
We ranged far and wide and deep through the history of the South after the Civil War, and also, unavoidably, through the history of jurisprudence in the South from the Civil War Era through the 1970's. He wouldn't allow a tape recorder so all I have are notes I took down.
Among the other things he told me was the fact that the actual States never allowed Dual Citizenship, even though the States of States did.
I underlined that in my notes, because he said it with great emphasis and intensity and roused himself to lean forward as he said it. There's no doubt that he meant for me to catch that bit of information and keep it.
The reason, he said, was to forestall conflict of interest. No man can serve two Masters. So the land law, which is based on the Bible, dictates that if we serve the land, we have to give up any other political affiliation and stand as State Citizens, not Federal Citizens, aka, United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States.
Almost fifty years have passed and I have been down many, many rabbit holes since then. I have never once in all my researches nor in the research of others who have probed these issues, encountered any contrary evidence.
No actual State ever allowed Dual Citizenship.
Nothing that man told me has ever proven to be anything but 100% correct and true. Nothing in my own research contradicts him. Nothing in any other research about this topic that I know of contradicts him.
So I am more than willing to stand here and say--- if you have proof that any actual land jurisdiction State in this country ever allowed Dual Citizenship (allowing Federal Citizens to act as State Citizens)--- bring it now, and I will eat all the crow you want.
I'll put a big banner on my website saying, "I Was Wrong About This!" and I will write an article explaining why I was wrong and how many ways I was wrong. But I don't believe I am wrong about this one.
And I do believe it matters, because if you assemble oranges you get a bushel of oranges, and if you assemble apples you get a bushel of apples.
I am not going to waste my time or anyone else's doing things that can't be done or don't need to be done.
If some foreign corporation wants to come in here and call itself a "State" and try to foist that off onto the gullible public, they can do so on their own dime and our team will continue to expose them for what they are.
No need for a bunch of well-meaning Americans to get sidetracked by something like that.
So let's drop the dime and get to the Finish Line. We have all these people claiming that you can be a Federal Citizen aka United States Citizen or Citizen of the United States and at the same time act as a State Citizen, and I am saying no actual land jurisdiction State ever allowed that.
Since we are looking for "negative evidence" and they made the claim, it's up to them to find a valid exception: at least one pre-Civil War State that allowed Dual Citizenship.
I certainly don't know of one, but maybe the people bad-mouthing me do. Maybe that old judge from South Carolina was senile and didn't really know what he was talking about.
But I wouldn't bet my life, my land, or my Bill of Rights on that, if I were you.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
14 hrs ·
Hats Off
There are people who touch our lives in gentle ways. Often, we don't know the impact they've had at the time, so of course, we don't thank them. Then life "happens" and time flows on, your paths don't meet, and then someday you hear their name or something jogs your brain and you think: I never said thank you. Too often, it's too late.
About a dozen years ago, one of those Special People crossed my path here in Alaska. I'd just lost another friend to cancer and saw a poster for a cooking class centered around an anti-cancer diet. It was free. I had time on my hands and a grudge to settle with the disease. So I went to class for six weeks. It was my introduction to Vegan cooking.
That class was taught by Delisa Renideo, otherwise known as The Barefoot Gardener. She recently published some of her best recipes in a new book, The Barefoot Gardener in the Kitchen Cookbook.
Vegans, as I was to learn, don't use animal products at all. Their diet is entirely plant-based. No milk, no eggs, no cheese. And of course, no meat.
Nonetheless, everyone seemed sane and healthy, and I was intrigued.
Like most of you reading this I briefly entertained the image of my life with food being reduced to gnawing on stalks of celery and maybe a baked potato with salt for Sunday dinner. I also had a twinge of the, "oh, no, not some kind of weird vegetarian cult!" suspicion, but I suppressed those biases and fears: with people dropping like flies from cancer and suffering from awful chronic diseases, it was obviously time to look for answers.
And anyway, a free cooking class where you get to taste the results seemed harmless enough for a respectable Granny to indulge in. Indulge, I did. It was all delicious.
I learned how to "massage" kale -- and otherwise, would probably have never eaten it. I learned lots of other wonderful things--- how to make a delicious cheese sauce without cheese, how to sweeten things without sugar (or nasty unnatural substitutes), and miracle of miracles, a healthy cookie recipe that my son liked better than standard Chocolate Chip Cookies.
If the benefits had stopped there, I would have called it one of the Top Ten Freebie Bargains in my whole life, but it didn't end with that.
As I s-l-o-w-l-y adjusted to my new knowledge base and began to implement what I had been taught, I also began to think more about nutrition and what I was eating and about how food is produced, and why so much of what we eat is nothing but air: empty calories, that is, calories that add to our waistlines, but don't nourish us at all.
It would take a miracle of Biblical proportions to turn my husband into a vegetarian, much less a vegan, but nonetheless the "little seed" Delisa planted in my brain persisted and bore more fruit. I began growing basil for pesto and other kitchen herbs and adding them to salads and soups. I whittled down the amount of meat the family was eating and soon, I was able to sneak in entire vegetarian meals without anyone noticing.
They all just adjusted and chowed down and didn't seem to notice that...bit by bit, we were converting from a Standard American Diet (SAD in more ways than one) to a better diet, a more nourishing diet, and did I mention-- a cheaper diet?
Oh, yes, even though I took the pledge and converted to 100% organic and non-GMO, our food budget went down by a whopping 25%. I can't even imagine how much money that has saved us over the last twelve years, but it is a lot of money. A lot.
And, the adventure continued. Somehow that little cooking class with Delisa Renideo hit the reset button on my relationship with food. No more limits! I threw Nasturtium blossoms and sweet violets into my salads. I rediscovered mushrooms and olives. I made Artisan Bread. And it was all good. And it was all better.
And it was all because of Delisa and Charlie and a cooking class.
I am still not a 100% vegetarian, much less can I call myself a Vegan, but I am a lot closer to being a vegetarian than I could ever imagine being and my old "whiskey and corn chips for breakfast" diet (somewhat of an exaggeration, but not much!) is a distant memory.
The benefits from that little cooking class just keep ticking along, year after year, paying dividends in new choices, new experiences, better health and better food.
Not everyone will be lucky enough to get a cooking class with Delisa, but everyone can buy her cookbook and use it as a portal to a whole new world of food. It's not a cheap book at $29.00, but that's nothing compared to the cost of a single doctor visit.
Hats off, to Delisa and Charlie Renideo, for being the difference and making the difference. I want to thank them and pass on the gift they gave me to you.
You can learn more at their website: Yes to life solution
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
Do I Have to Draw You Guys a Picture?
Addressed to the Oregon Assembly, March 10, 2019:
Do I have to draw you guys a picture?
You are mucking around in THEIR system instead of building your own.
You are going to get into trouble just like the Colorado Nine and for the same reason.
Thomas Deegan spent two years in jail already.
He was released for reasons he doesn't comprehend.
Now he is leading all the rest of you right back into the same trap again.
How many times does this have to happen and how many people have to suffer before you knotheads get it through your thick skulls?
They aren't us.
Repeat: they aren't us.
They never have been. They still aren't.
Their court system isn't our court system.
US Citizens aren't Americans, even if they were born
and bred here in the States.
Ask yourselves --- how could a political status that is literally created by the Constitutions be the same political status creating the Constitutions?
Americans are Parties to the Constitutions. US Citizens are subject to the Constitutions.
While acting as US Citizens (Federal Employees, Dependents, and Franchisees) you have no rights or guarantees provided by the Constitutions, you have only obligations and duties under the Constitutions.
So if you want to exercise your guarantees and exemptions you have to: (1) reclaim your birthright political status as an American State National/American State Citizen; (2) repopulate your States of the Union; (3) boot up your own court system to enforce the Public Law, including the Constitutions.
Instead of doing what needs to be done, you guys keep on thinking that you are going to use their court system against them.
You think that your Common Law Grand Jury is going to "put them in their place", when in fact all you are going to do is transgress onto their turf and get yourselves into trouble just like the Colorado Nine did.
That's why I drew the line against Bruce Doucette and that's why I am drawing the line against Deegan, Destry, Sun-Tzu, et alia.
You are wasting your time and your energy doing something that: (1) is never going to work; and (2) that needlessly endangers innocent people; and (3) has already been demonstrated as a dead end; and (4) detracts focus and energy away from what actually needs to be done.
If you are all stupid enough to go down that path in view of what I have forthrightly placed in front of you, and despite the demonstrated results of what happened to the Colorado Nine who did the same thing as you are promoting now, then you have only yourselves to blame and you can in no way blame me or take reference to anything I have said or done in your defense.
(Probably more agents that want to fail, so they can claim this stuff does not work by BJ)
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
Don't Blame Trump --- Blame the Pig Farmers
Day after day I listen to people spewing hate speech against Donald Trump, and the vast majority of the time, they are complaining about things that are being done to them by the Municipal Government.
Get a clue.
Donald Trump is not in control of the Municipal Government.
The members of Congress acting "as" the Municipal United States Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 are the problem. And they are acting as part of the Holy Roman Empire --- so blame the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church and the UN CORP and the Lord Mayor of London and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Benelux Governments, the Bank of France, and the IMF, World Bank, and BIS.
They are the ones causing unemployment, economic decline, horrible educational standards, wars for profit, moral depravity and promotion of human and drug trafficking ---not to mention the identity theft and fraud that has been practiced against us all--- you can take 95% of the rot and lay it at their feet.
The only way that the British Territorial Government (Trump's Baileywick) can be blamed for this current situation is that they have been entrusted with riding herd on the Municipal Government and have failed to do so. They have too often been bought off by co-option and bribes.
Trump isn't being bought off.
If he was, then everything would be roses and champagne for him inside the Beltway and the Mainstream Media would be slavering over him and licking his butt like they did with Barack Obama.
It's the people you are sending to Congress (albeit by voting in elections that were never meant for you and which aren't yours to vote in) that are operating as renegades and causing the foul stench coming out of Washington.
What else can you expect, when you let two political lobbies rule the roost and run everything? Lobbyists. Think about that word. You have lobbyists running what passes for a government.
In a normal government, a lobbyist is a member of a private interest organization that tries to influence the decisions of government. What we have instead are two such private interest organizations running the government.
Imagine two tribes of pigs, one pink and one brown, swarming over the trough and fighting each other over each piece of slop ---and you will have the picture of what is going on year after year in Washington, DC.
Standing around thinking that things are ever going to be better or different depending on which brand of pig you support is delusional at best.
A pig is still a pig, and the purpose of a pig is to eat, eat, eat.
So, Mr. Farmer, do you want to raise pigs at all? Is that what the government is supposed to be in business for? If not, why are you allowing this to go on?
A third of the Federal Government --- and the most important part of it from our perspective --- is gone. Missing in action. It's been this way for 150 years. It has never been "reconstructed".
And in the meantime, the Hired Help has had a hey day of unbelievable proportions at our expense. The Lobbyists occupied the empty chairs of the actual Federal Congress, and here we are, seemingly stuck between a chocolate-flavored Pig Poop Cocktail and a raspberry rendition of the same.
There is, of course, a Third Option. We could do what we are supposed to do, what we brag to the rest of the world about doing. We could self-govern.
We could wake up, reclaim our lawful birthright status as Americans, repopulate our land jurisdiction States of the Union, elect all our own officials, including our own peacekeeping officials, reconstruct our Federal-level States of States, and restore our actual government.
We could stop raising pigs. We could get out of the pig business altogether.
But first we have to wake up, and next, we have to get out of bed.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
46 mins ·
Virtually All Arguments Based On or About The Constitutions....
The Constitutions set up the Federal Government and barely mention us.
We have a bit role in the Preamble as the creators of an Express National Trust. We pop up to restrict Bills of Attainder and arrest and similar abuses in Article IV.
We make a reappearance in Amendment X. And there is a glancing one-step-removed nod to us and our States of America Confederacy in Article 6 where it references the fact that the debts of the original Confederacy (formed 1781) will remain its responsibility--- that is, won't be shared or transferred to the new British Territorial or Holy Roman Empire Municipal Government contractors.
In fact, so little is specifically said about us that as an after-thought and to place more explicit controls on the Federal Government concerning us, the Framers went back and added the Bill of Rights.
People are so egocentric that they assume that the Constitutions have to be about us, but they aren't. They are primarily about the Federal Government and about Federal Citizens.
Look at Amendment VII -- the important words are in parenthesis with numbers that correlate with the explanation below:
Amendment VII. In suits (at)[1] common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no (fact)[2] tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of (the)[3] United States, than according to the (rules)[4] of the common law.
1. It says "at". If this were referring to us, it would say "in" common law.
2. It says "fact". None of the courts of the United States judge the law or the facts.
3. It says "the" United States". This is referring to the Municipal Government.
4. It says "rules" of the common law. This is referring to military common law, not our version of "common law", which does not have "rules".
This is basically saying that when and if a Federal Citizen comes to jury trial in one of our courts ("at" common law from their perspective), our court's decision will not be reviewed by their courts except in the case of martial (common) law where soldiers and sailors are involved.
Look at Article VI:
“The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”
This is again talking about "the" United States --- the Municipal Government thereof, created under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17.
This is basically saying that the judicial power belonging to the Municipal Government will be vested in their own Supreme Court (which is no surprise, as it is a foreign government) and whatever inferior [Municipal] courts that the members of the [Municipal] Congress may ordain....
This is all talking about Municipal United States Government operations and says nothing whatsoever about our American courts at all.
The tragic mistake that so many people continue to make is to think that the Constitutions are talking about us when in fact the Constitutions are 99% about the US Federal Government and its Branches --- Federal, Territorial, and Municipal---that are being established by the Constitutions.
Think about what the Constitutions are designed to do--- they are setting up the parameters of a new (back then) power-sharing split, redelegating and splitting up powers and duties originally all performed by the States of America Confederation, with some of the powers being retained by the American-owned States of America and some powers being delegated to British service providers and some to Holy Roman Empire service providers.
All of the "delegated powers" actually belong to the States, which are subcontracting for services from: (1) the Confederate States of States, (2) the British Territorial Government, and (3) the Municipal United States.
The entire context of the Constitutions has little or nothing to do with us, the American States and People.
Our States agree to receive the stipulated services and agree to pay for them and agree to step aside and let the hired help do the jobs agreed upon. The rest is about the service providers and how they are supposed to function and what limits we placed upon them.
The Constitutions are fundamentally about our Service Providers and not about us at all, so we make a grievous error when we look to the Constitutions as our source of information about our own non-Federal American Government. We fall into the trap of mistaking "them" for us, and vice-versa.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
11 hrs ·
The Team has been hard at work all week developing the new website and countrywide teleconference for The American States Assembly. Much applause!!!!! And many thanks!!!!!
We decided to call it a "countrywide" call instead of a "nationwide" call, because there is only one country and this organization is devoted to assembling the land and soil jurisdiction States, finishing the Reconstruction of the "missing" Federal States of States, and ultimately convening a Continental Congress to take care of other business that has been left hanging for more than a century.
We are all about the actual, physical, geographically described States -- and our primary Mission is to:
(1) return people to their birthright political status as Americans;
(2) assemble our States of the Union;
(3) enforce the Public Law, including the Constitutions;
(4) take care of the business outlined above.
This Mission if you decide to accept it, will return you and your family to the land and soil of your birth. It may surprise you to learn that you ever left it!
So think of it as a homecoming, back to a place where you belong, where your rights and private assets are protected, and you don't have to live in fear of your own public employees.
We will be having our first "Countrywide Call" tomorrow, March 11, 2019.
Join us for the Maiden Voyage. I am recovering from a week long fight with the flu, so my voice sounds like gravel, but it will have to do. We are trying to make this a short but highly productive and informative one hour per week.
You can join via Zoom, or via telephone. Details listed below.
Please send questions to: theamericanstatesassembly@protonmail.com
The new website is: theamericanstatesassembly.net
And the teleconference numbers/addresses are posted below:
You are invited to a Zoom webinar.
When: Mar 11, 2019 6:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
Every week on Mon, until Apr 22, 2019, 7 occurrence(s)
Mar 11, 2019 6:00 PM
Mar 18, 2019 6:00 PM
Mar 25, 2019 6:00 PM
Apr 1, 2019 6:00 PM
Apr 8, 2019 6:00 PM
Apr 15, 2019 6:00 PM
Apr 22, 2019 6:00 PM
Please download and import the following iCalendar (.ics) files to your calendar system.
Weekly: https://zoom.us/webinar/597600142/ics…
Topic: Anna
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://zoom.us/j/597600142
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,597600142# or +19292056099,,597600142#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 929 205 6099
Webinar ID: 597 600 142
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/aezuON19iw
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
To The Supreme Commander of the Joint British Armed Forces
With respect to your published comments:
Our American Sovereignty derives from William the Conqueror; our claim of sovereignty is equal to or greater than any claim that Elizabeth Windsor (=Wind-sur) can make.
As your Queen holds authority delegated to her by us and you hold authority delegated by her, simple logic mandates that the management of the US Forces are our joint concern.
We should like to know by what plausible stretch of the imagination the failed military leadership proposes that they should assert authority under a delegated sovereignty in full view of the fact that they gained power by fraud and maintain power by fraud and have:
1. Failed to protect and manage our money since 1863;
2. Undermined the civilian government;
3. Bilked and embezzled their actual employers;
4. Promoted WWI and WWII and countless other atrocities;
5. Now offered us a QFS that works five minutes a day;
6. Proposed that all our economic affairs should be under their control;
7. Subjected our non-domestic population to exotic warfare tests;
8. Press-ganged innocent Americans under force;
9. Mis-characterized our people in violation of the Geneva Conventions;
10. Conspired against The Constitution of the United States of America;
11. Plundered public trusts created under conditions of constructive fraud;
12. Allowed our country to suffer nine decades of inland piracy;
13. Pretended that the word "benevolent" can ever enter into any of this.
This past week you have witnessed a silent, but we trust, effective demonstration of power and determination: World War III will not be allowed, nor will any continued Raj in America.
Most sincerely,
Anna Maria
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
March 12 at 2:06 PM ·
Two "Occupying" Forces
There are a lot of people stomping around blatting about sovereignty.
We, the American people, are recognized sovereigns. For most of us, our sovereignty lasts a few days or weeks at the very beginning of our lives, until the bean-counters get around to "registering" us as property belonging to a foreign corporation.
Because the theft of our sovereignty happens while we are babies, we aren't aware that it has been stolen, and that we, ourselves, have been kidnapped from our birthright political status and mis-identified as "US Citizens".
We've been unable to correct the situation as adults, because we were never made aware of it in the first place. This is a "totally unconscionable" contract. We don't even know it exists.
The evil in this country and in much of the world is because of this fraud practiced against us and our lawful government, but it is also because of our own ignorance and gullibility.
How could we live in fear of the IRS and be coerced to give up to 60% of our earnings, and ever believe that we were "free" in any sense of the word?
No, in order to be free, one must take responsibility and self-govern --- and that we have failed to do. To correct the situation requires us to make a mighty correction and at least in the short term, undertake a lot of work.
There are two foreign occupying forces on our soil, one British, one Holy Roman Empire-based.
The British Territorial Government controls our military and trade functions and runs the military-industrial complex.
The Holy Roman Empire-based organization runs the "civil" government as in Federal Civil Service, under the auspices of the Municipal Congress authorities (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17) operating in gross usurpation.
Both of these entities are foreign subcontractors with respect to our actual government, but we have been lulled to sleep and haven't operated our actual government in 150 years, so they have just made themselves at home and drunk up our wine cellars.
Most of the time they work together hand-in-hand to fleece us blind.
Sometimes they play carrot and stick with us, with one pretending to be the "Good Guy" and the other pretending to be the "Bad Guy".
And sometimes they earnestly fight with each other over turf, over direction, over profits.
They are currently coming up against each other as the "Royalists" of the Monarchies come push to shove against the "Globalist" Holy Roman Empire. Instead of viewing these as anything completely separate from each other, it is more profitable to imagine it as an in-house fight between Cousins.
One Cousin, the Holy Roman Empire, is trying to draw in its carefully constructed net of interlocking trust directorates and rule the whole world via controlling money and commerce, while the other Cousin is objecting to having its share of worldly power subjected to the Globalist scheme.
Both of them mean to do us harm and continue fleecing us, so again, we have a choice between Bad and Bad, just two different flavors thereof, but the circumstance together with growing worldwide awareness of their criminal activities does open up the opportunity for us to shake awake and self-govern.
If we don't have the right to tell our subcontractors how high to jump, who does?
In order to do so, we have to face up to a 150 years of history, have to overcome falsified commercial claims, have to overcome 12 years of public school indoctrination, have to find the courage and energy to act, have to plot a lawful path out of this morass and have to get organized to self-govern.
We are the lawful sovereigns of the land and soil, but sovereignty is hard work.
Self-governance is also deadly serious work, but for some reason, many people go off on tangents.
They scream "Fraud!" at the top of their lungs, which it is.
They dig in and try to cram course it all. And fail.
They endanger themselves and everyone else by making wrong assumptions.
They form little backdoor groups and sneak around.
They use fake names and fake addresses.
They go snake-eyed and paranoid.
Once that happens, they can't reason their way out of a paper bag.
Most of the time they fool around and get themselves arrested.
Or they slink off into the hills and try to hide.
Neither response does anything toward fixing the real problems we are faced with and neither is realistic.
Educating millions of Americans, showing them how to reclaim their birthrights, and then motivating them to restore the lawful government they are owed may not seem realistic, either. But it is still what needs to be done.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
March 12 at 4:01 PM ·
Outting Arnie Rosner (Scanned Retina)
At first, until he realized that he wasn't going to be able to get me to lead any kind of insurrection, Arnie Rosner befriended me and championed the information I was bringing forward.
But as soon as he realized that I was non-violent and lawful in my approach, he dropped me like a rock and claimed that I was a "Vatican Agent".
Now, just today, I have accused him of being a Zionist Agent, which amounts to the same thing as a Vatican Agent, because in the sense he meant it, both are Satanists and neither are Jews nor Catholics.
So, he did follow their Standard Operating Procedure and accuse me of being what he is himself, and now, I am returning the compliment.
The Zionists have been aching to get something going on our soil --- another mercenary conflict, another civil war. They would like nothing better than a little "insurrection" so they could bring out the canons and SWAT teams and start mowing innocent people down.
That's how they make money. A lot of money.
And killing off their Priority Creditors means that they never have to pay us back.
They can also collect over a million dollars a head for every one of us killed in "Life Force Value Annuities" and "Life Insurance".
Then, once we are dead, they can come in and claim all our "abandoned" property.
Finally, they can charge our grandchildren for the "service" they performed getting rid of us.
That's what they did to the Russians during the Russian Revolution and what they did to the actual Jews in Germany and that is precisely the same song and dance of inciting violence that Arnie Rosner has been doing for the last couple of years.
Anyone promoting violence of any kind should be marked and marked well as an Enemy of our Country and our People. They are promoting action that will provide an excuse for mercenary thugs to invade us under the pretense of "peacekeeping".
Have nothing to do with Arnie Rosner or anyone else like him preaching violent revolt and talking nonsense about "critical mass" and cheerleading to get former veterans involved in marches and other activities calculated to spark tempers and allow violent incidents.
Play cool. Play smart. Get even. Give them no excuse.
And shut your ears to the Arnie Rosners of the world who are trying to get us to revolt and take violent actions. That's what he wants. Not what we need.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
Horribly Misrepresented
All information seeming to suggest that I am or ever was an "Agent of the Vatican" comes directly from me, so there is no effort to hide anything I have ever done, nor is there any mystery concerning why I have done what I have done. This particular example that Arnie Rosner is waving around comes from my book, Disclosure 101.
In October 2007, I brought our objections and research directly to the Pope, Benedict XVI.
Why? Because he (and his Successors) are in charge of the Civil Government in this country (not civilian, civil) and as anyone can observe now--- thanks largely to me--- both the Territorial and Municipal (Civil) Governments are functioning in gross Breach of Trust.
It does no good in a compartmentalized hierarchy to attack low level employees; they can do nothing to change anything.
So realizing that the problem with our civil government administration at the federal level was within the Pontificate and its administration, I went straight to the top, because lower authorities would only defer to the Pope.
He heard me out. He was stunned. His answer was, and I quote, "Nobody told me!"
So the Office of Evil was such that even the purported head of the organization wasn't told what was going on.
I was in the midst of giving Notice to his employees and cohorts in the Church concerning the Great Fraud. Benedict asked me to add his authority to that Notice process, as the ultimate employer of the civil (municipal) government.
He asked me to do this for him so that the weight of his office would tell the employees to reform and not just ignore the Notice.
This was an unpaid mission that I was engaged in anyway and his reasoning made sense, so that is what we did.
That Notice process took seven (7) years between October 2007 and April of 2014. In that time period, about 10,000 pieces of mail went out of my home office at my own expense, informing members of the Municipal Governments worldwide, and the Territorial Governments, too.
When Benedict XVI left office in 2013, I had a few months left to do.
Francis did not end the Notice process, nor change the arrangement, so it continued on to its logical end in 2014.
The Final Judgment was issued in April 2014 and is published in my book, Disclosure 101.
A great deal of work has gone into giving every Territorial and Municipal organization on Earth a shot at doing the right thing, or at least not doing the wrong thing.
All these Notices went out via "Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent", so we may assume that far more than 10,000 people worldwide were made aware of the Breach of Trust and criminal mismanagement ongoing in this country and many other countries around the world.
So far as this work was concerned, the Church Officials did what you would expect Church Officials to do. They took steps to correct and then they battened down the hatches and have done what they could to protect the Church. The Office of Pontiff was dissolved and ended in 2011, along with the underlying Trust, the Romanus Pontifex.
I don't know how other people view the current state of the world, but to me it is clear that the Apocalypse --- the Great Revealing --- has come and much of the dirty linen of the Roman Catholic Church has been prominently on display, including this vast exposure of wrong-doing by the Municipal Governments that are supposed to be operated "lawfully" --- not legally.
The Municipal United States Government which administered the civil government here has always been under the ultimate control of the Pontificate and has now, since 2011, been passed on directly to the Holy Roman Empire.
This situation was not the original structure of our government.
That is, the Municipal United States oligarchy run by members of the Territorial Congress, was never meant to run our civil government.
That duty was supposed to be performed by the States of America organization that was destroyed and never reconstructed after the Civil War. The ensuing "emergency" and the rationale that "someone had to do it" while the "government [Federal branch of the Federal Government]" was in "abeyance" led to these abuses.
But in point of fact, the entire circumstance didn't affect our actual government at all, as both the States and the People remained after the Civil War, and all this corruption was based on deliberate misrepresentation and self-interested constructive fraud.
In any event, as my Letter to Cardinal George of Chicago (published on my website) makes clear, the tenor of my communications and Notices throughout this seven year period were highly informative and critical of the Municipal Government and the Church's failure to do right by the States and People of this country and cannot in any way be taken as "pro status quo" or "working for the Pope" in continuance of their bad behavior.
My role for those seven years was to give them Due Process ---and that I surely did. Any misrepresentation of me being "in league" with those forces in the Vatican that were promoting these crimes against Humanity needs to be squelched with prejudice. I was already the driving spearpoint demanding reform and restitution from the Pope(s) when Arnie Rosner was sitting around on his duff watching re-runs of Bonanza.