InfoWars has suddenly began to broadcast the Bundy Retrial, information contributed by Shari Dovale. Starts at 23:00 mark
http://youtu.be/9X2XmKUxdJg
Printable View
InfoWars has suddenly began to broadcast the Bundy Retrial, information contributed by Shari Dovale. Starts at 23:00 mark
http://youtu.be/9X2XmKUxdJg
This isn't the Bundy trial, it is the sentencing kf the 93 year old doctor who has been held in the Southern Nevada Detetion Center with the Bundy political prisoners. John Lamb
http://youtu.be/U9Wle359Yi0
https://youtu.be/U9Wle359Yi0
John Lamb and Andrea Olson-Parker August 1 retrial recap ~ J Grady
http://youtu.be/rlLjD1kCUdE
https://youtu.be/rlLjD1kCUdE
Anthony Dephue interview on AM580 KUBC radio Idaho Political Prisoners Foundation
http://youtu.be/7x_8AKLEmEc
https://youtu.be/7x_8AKLEmEc
^ That was a really good interview with Anthony Dephue. He needs to do a lot of these kinds of interviews. He's well spoken and does a good job of explaining the situation the Bundys and this country are facing. It's a communist takeover and the destruction of our constitutional republic as Ben Franklin warned us about when this country was founded.
What's happening is so similar to what happened in Russia and Ukraine with the Bolshevik revolution. The way this is looking is if you challenge the government you'll be imprisoned or murdered and that's exactly what the peasants in Russia and Ukraine faced in the revolution. Your only choice is to die slowly or resist and die quickly or brutally at the hands of the government.
Protesters on trial for . . PROTESTING! Tumbleweed's post #1305
Bunkerville Protesters On Trial – for Protesting
THE BUNKERVILLE STANDOFF IS NOTEWORTHY IN THAT THERE WAS NO VIOLENCE ON THE PART OF THE PROTESTERS.
August 2, 2017 BLM, Constitution, Featured, Nevada
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...Banner-JPG.jpg
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...ys-678x381.jpg
Protesters On Trial
by Shari Dovale
The retrial of four Bunkerville defendants is underway in Las Vegas, Nevada. The first trial ended in a mistrial when the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict.
It is known that the jury favored acquittal in the previous trial with 2 of the defendants receiving 10-2 votes in their favor.
Additionally, the jury forms showed marks indicating acquittal, which were later scratched out over confusion on legal points.
However, the government has learned a few lessons since then. They have attempted to change their narrative to reconcile with, what they hope will be, a more popular view of their prosecution.
During the first trial, the prosecutors, including AUSA Steven Myhre, and Judge Gloria Navarro, spent considerable time calling the large group of protesters “unindicted co-conspirators”. They stressed to potential witnesses that their testimony on behalf of the defendants could result in their own prosecution. This resulted in claims of witness intimidation and more.
Judge Navarro has also taken an unusual step in the second trial by allowing the jurors to ask questions of the witnesses. This was, apparently, in hopes of changing the course of their prosecution to conform with what they believe the jurors wanted to hear.
The jury questions have shown that the members have been paying attention and are not completely on board with the government’s narrative. This has prompted changes from the government to alter their strategy.
Through the beginning of the trial, they did not make too many changes from the strategy of the first trial. I heard “unindicted co-conspirator” a couple of times, including from Judge Navarro.
All of a sudden, the prosecution witnesses are using new, yet specific, buzzwords during their testimony You will now hear “Constitution” and “Second Amendment” used on the witness stand, though it has yet to be announced that the defense will be allowed to use these same terms.
The most prominent witness to attempt the change of narrative was Ranger Edwin Whitteakerand his repeated use of these buzzwords. It was still obvious, however, that he had never read the Constitution, nor does he understand it’s concepts as he referred to the 2nd Amendment as the right to “Free Speech”.
Why are these points so important?
Former Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote, “Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime.”Remember that the government is now calling the people in the wash “Protesters”. This gives them First Amendment protection. They have the right to assemble. They have the right to question their government.
They utilized their Second Amendment protections during this protest, as has been noted by the prosecution witnesses. Nevada is an “Open Carry” state.
“Open carry” refers to the practice of carrying firearms in plain view in public spaces. Though most states continue to require a permit in order to carry a concealed weapon in public, most states now place few to no restrictions on open carry.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...open-carry.jpg
Therefore, the government’s big push to keep these right-wing dissidents in custody is all about a show of force to the general public that they cannot protest their government.
The Federal government has not placed the same restrictions on liberal groups, as is noted from the “Occupy Wall Street” and related protests. You will also note that the Ferguson riots were written off as the rights of free speech. However, the violence and destruction that were considered breaking the law were not prosecuted and the business owners were left to deal with these issues through their insurance companies.
The Bunkerville Standoff is noteworthy in that there was no violence on the part of the protesters. There were no shots fired though there were many firearms visible. There was no rioting, brawling or other altercation. The only “beef” you would see was Cliven Bundy’s cattle.
The government would have you believe, as per the testimony given in this trial, that the protesters came with violence in mind. The law enforcement officers were caught unawares and by surprised, therefore, they were in fear for their life. This is completely not true.
The officers knew that the protesters were coming. They had already begun negotiations to release the cattle. There were hundreds of law enforcement, from multiple agencies, on scene. They were not dressed in “riot gear” but in full battle gear and fully armed. There were snipers on the high mesa aiming their weapon at the men, women, and children in the wash and on the bridge.
Law enforcement showed aggression on April 12, 2014 in Bunkerville, Nevada. They sent a message to the world that right-wing, Constitution-citing, dissidents will not be tolerated.
Diane Bundy reposted what Nevada Assembly Woman Shelly Shelton wrote a few days after the Bundy Ranch Standoff.
It turns out she was correct.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/8248...1530785292235/
Diane Bundy shared Assemblywoman Shelly Shelton's photo.
14 hrs
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...ad&oe=5A012D23
Assemblywoman Shelly Shelton14 hrs
Following is my first Facebook post on my campaign site. The date was April 17, 2014.
The Bundy family put a lot of faith in some members of the Sheriff's department for the respect and decency a few of them showed at the end of the protest. I, however, did not have faith in them.
Here we are over three years later, with family men locked in prison without trial over a year and a half. Where are these helpful Deputies now? Out of 5,000 LE in this county, where are the ones with the guts to stand up to their masters and say "These are decent people, they never wanted any kind of violence and they never assaulted any officers." Their corrupt leaders have already taken the stand for the prosecution to lie, slant and bury the truth. Where are the "Good Officers" we keep hearing about?
----------------------
From April 17, 2014
Wrong side of the Fence
On April 12 Nevadans and Americans got a taste of what the future of America looks like if drastic change doesn't come soon.
Cliven Bundy is one of a long line of Ranchers and Americans who have been forced out of business by endless regulations and a concerted criminal effort by left-wing fringe groups who use the complexity of the law to break the backs of hard working Americans.
The Gestapo Federal Agents, heavily armed came to steal his cattle, making the claim that he owes "grazing fees" to them.
The BLM, the Media and other local know it all pundits who chose to remain ignorant of facts, and surprisingly, even Fox News, never bothered to mention the fact that the United States government gave up the rights to charge grazing fees on that land in 1998 when they permanently sold the rights for the sum of $375,000 to Clark County, Nevada, the very entity that Bundy has been trying to pay.
I don't know about you, but I have sold rights to businesses before. Once the rights are sold, I have no more claim on future revenue, or past due accounts.
This "he owes a million in grazing fees" is the result of slick federal lawyers, working against a Rancher representing himself in court. These lawyers, who you pay for through your taxes, were able to use complex legal tactics to find a sympathetic judge to rule in their favor.
They have a lot of practice in this after their resounding defeat regarding another Rancher, Mr. Wayne Hage, who took on their abuse and with legal wrangling of his own, found a judge that understands the law and awarded him a 4.4 million dollar judgement in 2008, of which not one dime has ever been paid to he family. (BLM fails to pay it's own "fees"?)
To make matters even worse, the Federal Government Judge shopped and tried numerous legal tactics, many contradicting, till they got the ruling overturned. (Surprised?)
Which brings me to the Title - Wrong side of the Fence.
Mr. Bundy had only one place to turn. The courts failed Cliven Bundy. The courts failed Wayne Hage and years of turmoil took his life. His only help could come from the local Sheriff of Clark County, Doug Gillespie.
Many Sheriffs throughout the west have come to the aid of their citizens through similar situations.
But not Sheriff Gillespie. Nor the two clones running for his seat in the next election. Joe Lombardo and Larry Burns.
They literally chose to pull their command post and bus sized paddy wagons up to the negotiation fence on the side of the BLM FACING towards the American people who were there in protest. Lombardo even had the nerve to use this situation as a photo op by interviewing on TV and getting close enough to get a picture with Dave Bundy.
A Mr. Love, the negotiator for the BLM, who eventually ended up AT the fence negotiating with Bundy son's and the American people, was secretly audiotaped two days prior and recorded saying that they had the ability to arrest ALL the protesters and that we better come with "10,000" because he has seen our numbers and we don't have enough.
Being that the BLM didn't have any paddy wagons, how did Mr. Love know that the Sheriff would ride in licking BLM boots with more firepower and buses two days before the confrontation happened?
He knew beforehand that no matter what, Las Vegas Metro Police would be on the WRONG SIDE OF THE FENCE.
This confrontation isn't just about the federal government. It is about every law enforcement agency in the country that has turned against it's citizens and now stand on the wrong side of the fence
We have seen that together we can really make a difference.
While that ATV in the garage and a big mortgage may make a law enforcement officer point guns at innocent Americans, 2000 Americans lawfully armed and in control, will quickly turn the tables.
We, in Nevada have no law enforcement. We have paid assassins. What do you have in your city? Are there any constitutional Sheriffs or Law enforcement who are men enough to stand on your side of the fence?
If not, you need to step out and do everything you can to use the ballot box and the soap box to eliminate those who would stand on the wrong side of the fence.
by Shelly Shelton, Homemaker, Mother, Wife, Small business owner, American, and now Candidate for Nevada State Assembly.
LikeCommentShare
Robert Stafford, Linda Lake, Kevin Webb and 15 others like this.
12 shares
Comments
View 4 more comments
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...d7&oe=59F455C3
Robert Copley Sorry, but this subject is a burr under my saddle and I realize that people do not understand nor care to understand my statement when I say that the U.S. Federal Government is an illegal, de facto government but, if the people would read and understan...See More
Like · 1 hr
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...90&oe=59FC6B82
Jolene Kniffing Thanks, Robert Copley for informing us ignoramuses! Government is so secret, it's hard to know what they are about so you are even beyond me!
Like · 1 hr
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...90&oe=59FC6B82
Jolene Kniffing replied · 2 Replies · 20 mins
And this jewel from the kikes over at SPLC
A Rally for America on the U.S. Capitol Grounds Becomes A Rally for the Bundy Family
In recent weeks, the murmur of anger and frustration over the federal government’s treatment of the Bundy family has grown into a loud chorus — from GOP political operative Roger Stone, a self-professed agent provocateur, to Larry Klayman, an attorney for the antigovernment movement — calling on President Trump to pardon those charged in the 2014 standoff.
That much was clear last weekend on the lawn of the U.S. Captiol, where about 100 people gathered Saturday for the Rally for America. While the event served to showcase complaints the radical right has fostered for decades, the rally seemed to have one focus. There were angry diatribes about the power of federal agencies from the Department of Education to the Federal Reserve, and a few speakers lauding President Trump for tamping down the forces of political correctness. But the event was dominated by the saga of the Bundy family and the federal government.
https://www.splcenter.org/sites/defa.../rhodes_dc.jpg
Stewart Rhodes, president of the Oath Keepers, addresses the Rally for America at the U.S. Capitol on July 29, 2017. (Hatewatch/Ryan Lenz)
“The persecutions and prosecutions that are going on right now in Nevada in the Bundy trial, or the continuations of [charges related to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge] have to stop,” Stewart Rhodes, president of the Oath Keepers, one of the rally’s sponsors, said while calling on the White House to intervene. “It’s as though Hillary Clinton had won the election.”
As Bundy, his two sons Ammon and Ryan, and a host of supporters prepare to go to trial in Nevada on charges stemming from the April 12, 2014, standoff, Rhodes is not alone in expecting the president to intervene and help the Bundy family. Klayman, in fact, has argued that prosecuting the Bundy family shows the hand of the "deep state" at work in seeking retribution for racist commentsmade by the Bundy family patriarch.
While many Americans view the Bundys' standoff in Nevada as radical right extremism or domestic terrorism, an angry cohort that argues the Bundy family did nothing wrong has intensified efforts to put the Bunkerville standoff and the Oregon occupation in a narrative alongside Randy Weaver’s 1992 confrontation with federal agents in Ruby Ridge and the siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas a year later. These events inspired Timothy McVeigh’s bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995 and continue to motivate the antigovernment movement today.
“All of us were worried,” Rhodes said of the events surrounding the standoff and later efforts to protect the Bundy family from the federal government, which abandoned its efforts to confiscate the Bundys' cattle as payment for more than $1 million in grazing fees and fines. “We had seen Waco. We had seen Ruby Ridge. We had seen the abuse of power, and we had seen federal law enforcement murder people. And we were not going to let that happen again. That’s why we were there.”
Putting the Bunkerville standoff and the Malheur occupation in that critical context is an effort that has been building on the radical right since January 2016, when FBI sharp shooters killed Malheur occupier Robert LaVoy Finicumafter he charged a police roadblock, careened off the road into a snowbank and, while stumbling in the knee-deep drifts, appeared to reach for a pocket that contained a handgun.
Finicum’s wife, Jeanette, also spoke at the rally.
)]https://www.splcenter.org/sites/defa...finicum_dc.jpg
Jeanette Finicum, the wife of LaVoy Finicum, speaks at the Rally for America on July 29, 2017. (Hatewatch/Ryan Lenz)
Flanked by signs that read, “We are LaVoy,” flags with her husband’s cattle brand and the Gadsden “Don’t Tread on Me” flag, and choking back tears, Finicum said her husband was “murdered by our government during an illegal roadblock known as a kill stop with no warrant.”
“He was standing for property rights. He was standing for our disappearing liberties," Finicum told the audience. "He was standing for you,” Finicum said.
As much as the rally was evidence that the antigovernment movement has not gone away in the era of Trump, it also served as a stark reminder of a movement that remains dangerous despite a public appearance of being assuaged by the adminstration’s attention to the radical right. As Rhodes, with the Capitol steps rising behind him to congressional offices where he once worked for Rand Paul, quickly reminded those at the rally, it doesn’t matter who holds the levers of power. What matters, Rhodes said, is that they understand the power of the people.
“If we had wanted to kill all those federal agents that day,” in Bunkerville, Rhodes said, “They’d be dead. The same goes for Malheur.”
John Lamb with the update on the Bundy Retrial August 2, ~ J Grady. With the obvious bias in this trial, even with a hand picked, stacked jury I think it would be hard to give a guilty verdict.
Exposing the corruption in the Judge Navarro courtroom.
http://youtu.be/kuz-suPachY
https://youtu.be/kuz-suPachY
Andrea Olson-Parker August 2, Bundy Retrial
http://youtu.be/vAlv2Cohz_E
https://youtu.be/vAlv2Cohz_E