Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

Anna von Reitz
March 12 at 4:04 PM ·

Recap of Our Maiden Voyage--

You all sent in some great questions for our "Maiden Voyage" broadcast of our first-ever Countrywide Call for The American States Assembly:

Among the important topics we discussed were:

(1) the differences between States and States of States,

(2) where the whole concept of soil and land jurisdictions came from (British Land Law),

(3) how is a Law Enforcement Officer is different from a Peacekeeping Officer (the Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc. decision and Pinkerton Laws),

(4) the status of Federal Civilian and Military Employees,

(5) the continuing obligation of Federal Employers and Social Security to pay pension dividends and provide services to vested participants regardless of changes in political status after retirement or other severance of employment.

(6) We also discussed the importance of Baby Deeds and putting an end to the shameful practices that have allowed these predators to falsify our records in the first place.

Unfortunately, as we are still working out the bugs, the recording of this event was lost and won't be available for replay. No doubt we will revisit these large and important topics again and we look forward to more new questions this week for next Monday's Countrywide Call.

Please send your questions to: theamericanstatesassembly@protonmail.com.

Please visit the new website at: theamericanstatesassembly.net

And keep the Zoom link handy: https://zoom.us/j/597600142

Call in: 1 (669) 900-6833, or 1 (929) 205-6099.

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

Logic, Logic, Logic.....

You've been given irrefutable proof that:

(1) the Federal Branch of the Federal Government was overthrown in the 1860's and never rebuilt;

(2) the necessary "Reconstruction" has never been completed;

(3) we have lived under a British Territorial military junta since then, operating under the authority of a Commander-in-Chief, acting via Executive Orders;

(4) the actual Government owed to the States and People was never part of the Civil War and is still owed to us, if we bother to wake up and operate it.

So now various Fools and Ghouls among us are trying to ignore these facts and bring forward completely insupportable theories, among them, the idea that the military junta has to "validate" what we are doing.

We, the States and People operating the States, are the civilian government that they are obligated to serve. We are their employers and they are our employees. Without us, they don't get their paychecks.

Today I received several nasty comments telling me to be "afraid, very afraid" or the Big, Bad FBI was going to get me, and telling me that their "tip line" had been activated and that they couldn't verify my position as a judge.

This is on top of claims earlier this week that the FBI had interviewed me and asked questions and that in response to this non-existent grilling, I turned tail and stopped claiming to be a judge.

Let's get this straight: the FBI knows better than to talk to me, and they never have done so, because they know that they are just subcontractors of subcontractors working for a different government which is in fact under contract to serve my government.

Once the civilian government appears, the military government is obligated to stand down. Why? Because they are standing on our soil and getting their paychecks from us.

And the FBI is several pegs down the totem pole from the military.

I also had claims that the FBI "failed to validate" --- well, yes, of course.

Does the Government of Slovenia validate the Government of France? Do I require the say-so of my own employees to "validate" what I do?
Hardly.

The people making these claims don't have a clue who they are or how things actually work, and they have an even dimmer idea of who I am and in what capacity I am acting.

Let's all get a clue here: I am a State Judge, not a State-of-State Judge.
Therefore, you will look a long, long time among the ranks of State of Alaska Judges before you ever see my name.
Wake Up.

In the days to come, we are going to teach you who you are (and you are not, generally speaking, "United States Citizens" nor are you "Citizens of the United States") and we are going to show you how to recoup what has been stolen from you and we are going to make sure that everyone who wishes to come forward and claim their birthright is protected.

Stick around. It's going to be worthwhile.

And as for all the naysayers and pundits, who like Bruce Doucette, think that they can form "Common Law Grand Juries" and attack the Queen's Bench--- while acting as "US Citizens" no less?

If they keep trying to get people to riot and revolt instead of pursuing a lawful course of remedy, they will probably be arrested.

That's what has happened to such characters in the past and it is likely to happen again. And nobody can say I didn't warn them.

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

The International Trade Bank Answer

As recently discussed as part of the Jural Assembly Series, the interface between the world of fact and the world of fiction occurs in the International Jurisdiction of the Sea.

On one side of the Corporate Veil (Bar) is the land and soil and the lawful realm of actual assets and actual money, and on the other side, is the legal world of the sea and the air, the realm of bills of lading and commercial script.

To my knowledge, there is one form of institution that can handle transactions on either side of the Veil, according to kind, and do so very efficiently: The International Trade Bank.

The International Trade Banks have been mothballed over the years while their commercial bank sisters took over the world and forced everything and everyone to function in commerce as commercial corporations.

Now that more and more of us have caught onto the scam and are removing ourselves from this web of deceit and enslavement, the two "sides" of the issue --- the gold bugs on one side, the commercial banking interests on the other --- are offering us deals we can't refuse.

According to them.

We have a quasi-military version touting itself as the "Quantum Financial System" --- QFS, which is just a glorified file data storage system and we have the antiquated SWIFT system --- neither of which are all things to all people, and both of which singularly fail to perform the needed function: an interface between the world of actual assets, and the world of commercial paper.

We are being told we can have one or the other, but not both --- yet both are necessary for the global economy to stay afloat.

The QFS won't work, because on one hand we are being told that all world currencies will have the same value relative to gold (which is an impossibility) and on the other hand, we are being told that there is vastly more gold already stockpiled than is needed for backing all the various currencies in the world.

Neither basic math nor human nature are being factored into the QFS , and a system that starts out with false premises cannot be expected to succeed.

How long before some military leader or group of military leaders decides to start "leaking" some of that excess gold into the economies of the subject nations and artificially tampering with the supposedly "transparent" system?

Can we measure it in nanoseconds?

This is, after all, precisely the same mechanism as the Economic Stability Fund (ESF) simply applied to a pot of gold instead of a pot of oil or a pot of paper, and yet another form of commodity rigging.

It doesn't matter if the commodity being rigged is gold, oil, or paper.

No, QFS is not an answer to anything. It's a heavy-handed and poorly veiled "offer" to set up yet another gigantic global commodity rigging scheme, expedited by computer and A1 controls.

No, thank you, we do not consent; our ability to form our own contracts will not be so summarily overtaken.
Refer to the G2O2P3 Treaty.

We have it in our ability to transact our own business in kind, via International Trade Banks which can navigate the interface between actual and symbolic trades with ease. Time to get busy hauling them out of the mothballs.

No need for another monolithic military-controlled commodity rigging scheme in which there is no substantial difference between BRICS and the IMF in function or position.

China? Have you lost your mind? Russia? Have you lost your nation? US -- what the @$!$!$# are you playing at? EU -- wake up and shake a leg.

Britain -- Mr. Wonderful pretends that he is an "Absolute Royalist" --- time to find out which "royalty" he serves. It isn't yours.

We already have better systems than QFS and better answers than an arbitrary global commodity rigging scheme. And the Treaties are already in place.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

You Cannot be a PAG and a State Citizen at the Same Time

A Private Attorney General (PAG) is an office that is part of the old Territorial Federal Corporation, and is a Bounty Hunter under their re-defined 1868 "Fourteenth Amendment" to their corporate constitution. It has to be operated by someone who is a "United States Citizen".

And as we have discovered and discussed to some length, you cannot act as a State Citizen and a United States Citizen at the same time, because none of the actual States ever allowed Dual Citizenship of any kind.

None of those claiming otherwise have brought me an iota of factual evidence that any State ever adopted Dual Citizenship. So there it stands.

So far as the States of the Union are concerned, you can act as a State Citizen or State National --- for example, an Oregonian or Wisconsinite or Minnesotan, but you cannot at the same time act as a United States Citizen.

So if you are setting up an actual and legitimate State Assembly (and not a corporate franchise State of State "Assembly") you have to adopt the singular State Citizenship required. You can't function as an undeclared Double Agent of any kind.

Which also means you can't claim or operate any office of a foreign government, like Private Attorney General, either.

People must get it through their heads that the "US Government" is under contract to our Government, but the two are not the same. The two are in fact foreign with respect to each other as England is foreign to Germany.

Being a member of an American State Government requires singular allegiance to it.

You can't work for "England" and "Germany" at the same time. You can't be a "PAG" under the auspices of the Territorial United States Government and claim to be acting as an Assembly Member of Oregon at the same time.

Anna von Reitz
11 hrs ·

The Situation, the Ledger, and You

If you are an American State Citizen or American State National, you were always owed exemption from paying mortgages, federal taxes, loans of credit (because you were the source of all that credit, unbeknownst to you), utility bills, college tuition, etc., etc., etc.

What was supposed to happen was that when these bills were presented to you, you were supposed to receive a "Mutual Offset Credit Exchange".
They were supposed to credit your account against debts they already owed you.

Jim owes you ten, you owe him five, so you agree to write off five of what he owes you and that cancels your debt to him entirely.
That's what was supposed to happen.

Instead, the politicians dreamed up this identity theft fraud scheme in which your credits were blocked using the excuse that you were "presumed dead" and converted into a "United States Citizen" or a "Citizen of the United States" and therefore not owed exemption.

The criminals then forced you to pay full boat for everything plus interest.

Your actual work and goods were exchanged under monopoly inducement for pieces of paper underwritten by your own credit, and at the end of the day, the Perps declared bankruptcy and skated away, leaving you to hold the bag. Twice. They did this in 1907 and 1933 and each time, the American States and People took it in the shorts.

Now the actual billing has been discovered and the web of deceits and Bad Faith underlying it, too.

The Department of Defense has "discovered" $21 trillion in credit that is owed to you --- credit that you and your ancestors are owed that you never received. That amount almost exactly equals their "National Debt".
Guess why?

Now the same Bad Actors are trying to force you to convert to an asset-backed system in order to snuff their own debt. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"

Instead, what needs to happen is for all that credit to be applied and the bookkeeping done, while at the same time allowing us to translate credit as needed into asset-backed currencies.

Some of you have asked about Peter of England's Debt Eradication Vouchers -- these would transfer credit from the DOD stockpile to offset debts owed by American State Nationals and American State Citizens. Every credit thus transferred would reduce the US National Debt by the same amount.

It is basically all bookkeeping that was conveniently left undone and remedy that was fraudulently withheld from the American People for the better part of a hundred years, so that the perpetrators could afford to wage wars and have vast slush funds which they used to buy politicians and controlling interest in the stock market and to set up the Exchange Stabilization Fund to rig the world currency markets and to do all sorts of other nefarious things.

So the Debt Eradication Vouchers would take care of one part of the need and provide a means of settling all mortgages and college loans and that sort of thing. A special Credit Card could be issued to pay ongoing medical expenses and utility bills. All of that would be a tremendous relief.

But above and beyond that, there needs to be a means set up to translate credit into asset-backed currencies, so that we can participate in the world economy on our own terms. Certainly, we don't need or want to convert 100% of the credit owed to us into asset-backed currencies, but we do want to be able to do that, too.

So this is why the concept of the International Trade Bank makes so much sense. You can have a shadowbank (aka Private Commercial Bank) on one side of the institution cancelling debt using the Vouchers and issuing credit to pay off ongoing bills, and an asset-backed system bank on the other side of the institution --- all under one roof, but not commingling --- with a "Sister Account" that receives lawfully converted credit as asset-backed money.

This allows both systems to function and to repay credit in real time and to convert credit to asset-based money in real time---both as needed. This, then, allows for a much smoother and easier transition process for everyone as it spreads worldwide.

However, to reclaim your credit(s) and vouchers and set up such a system requires that you participate and reclaim your American State National/American State Citizen status.

Every American who completes the paperwork to return their Good Name to the land and soil of an American State is "eligible" for repayment credit. All members of our actual State Assemblies will-- by definition-- be eligible.

This doesn't mean that others who are currently working for the Federal Government and/or acting as US Citizens of some kind will be permanently shut out --- but they will have to go by a different pathway or will probably have to wait until they separate from Federal Employment.

We are in the process of setting up a computerized system to allow you to "log in" to confirm your eligibility and your interest in setting up a credit/asset account with our international trade bank as described above.

I expect there will be links on my website and The American States Assembly website and probably PaperUpNow.com, also.

We need approximately 120,000 eligible participants to launch the program.

What say you? Ready to receive back credit that is owed to you, your parents, and your grandparents?

I know I am.

As the tally function kicks in, I will be keeping everyone up to date.
This is going to be fun!

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

Proof that Sun-Tzu Can't Read and My Comment on MGJA

This morning I received a piece of yellow journalism seeking to misrepresent my words on the page right in front of people's noses. In my own statement I explained that yes, I have a blood oath on the altar of the Universal Catholic Church.

So do you, if you have ever taken Communion in any Christian Church.
"Catholic" means "Universal" or "Whole". I am not talking here about the Roman Catholic Church. I am talking about the Church formed by all earnest Believers: the True Church.

There is, at the end of the day, only one True Church of those called by the Father to be part of the family of Jesus and even Jesus could not say who among his own Disciples would be called by his Father.

Also in my own statement, I made it very clear that I was bringing forward the Great Fraud "for remedy" ---- in other words, so that the fraud can be corrected and people can receive remedy for it. Why else would I risk my life and go straight into the Lion's Den? So that things could continue on as business as usual?

The idiocy of Sun-Tzu and everything being presented on Nesara News is easy to prove. Read what I actually said versus his "creative interpretation".

Then stir your stumps and look up the actual Nesara legislation. It hasn't been touched in decades. So what news is there to tell about that?

It's all nothing but lies and "Hope Porn" designed to keep people scared on one hand and hopeful on the other --- paralyzed, in other words.

And the Michigan General Jural Assembly, much to my own disappointment, has proven to be a similar Twisted Lizzy version of reality.

The Michigan General Jural Assembly is not properly constituted of American State Citizens, so they have failed the test and do not have any such authority or position as the saviors of anything related to the American States of the Union.

You can't cook with oranges and get apple sauce.

They have insisted on including "US Citizens" as part of their Assembly, which invalidates any claim they have to our land jurisdiction and also invalidates all their purported actions in behalf of the People of Michigan.

Those who have the same political status (Territorial) as those born in Puerto Rico have no business pretending to "represent" us or our States. We are presenting ourselves as proper Lawful Persons and neither need nor accept such "representation".

States of States are not States. US Citizens are not operating as Americans, even if they were born and bred here. Enough said.

The organizers of the Michigan General Jural Assembly were given the information and given the opportunity to correct their status to enable them to act in behalf of their State, and they have refused to do so. They have also failed to provide any proof that Michigan or any other actual State of the Union ever allowed Dual Citizenship.

If you want to arrive at your intended destination (home, free and safe in your own country) you have to know the law and the history and the jurisdictional issues involved, otherwise, you remain a "fugitive" from the Queen's service, or an escaped slave of the Municipal Government. This is why these people are constantly afraid and preaching fear to others, using nom de guerres and "safe houses" and generally acting like criminals.

If it makes no sense to you that you should live in fear of your own employees, join us. Stop the nonsense.

US Citizens have no guaranteed right to "assemble" and no other Constitutional guarantees and they never have had any such guarantees.
At best, they have been granted "Equal Civil Rights" when it pleases their Masters to give such "privileges".

What the Michigan General Jural Assembly is preaching and teaching on these issues is just plain wrong, and has been proven wrong by others already in jail --- Bruce Doucette and the Colorado Nine among them.

Accordingly, I have drawn the line in the sand and separated myself and my Followers from their adherents and established a separate website and separate countrywide teleconference and rallying point for those who are assembling the actual unincorporated States of the Union and invoking the actual authority of the People of this country.

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

Get "YOUR" BC's Now

If you haven't yet tracked down certified copies of the Birth Certificates issued in your NAME, do so now.

Order at least three copies if at all possible.

Word has it that it is becoming more and more difficult to get a certified copy of a BC from these State of State organizations. This may be because of cutbacks in services, but may also reflect reluctance to provide evidence of their own wrong-doing.

Either way, a word to the wise is sufficient. The BC is a two-edged sword. It is proof that you exist and were born on the land and soil of this country, and it is also proof of the crime they committed against you by forming and enforcing an unconscionable contract.

When you get your certified copies of the BC they issued in your NAME, notice that it is issued on bond paper. It is a security. Notice who it is signed by? The Registrar --- an Officer of the Probate Court. This is proof that your estate has been illegally probated.

It's embarrassing and costly when you show up alive and well.

Don't delay. Order your certified copies of "YOUR" Birth Certificate now. You will need them going forward to establish your identity and proper political status --- and also to claim credit and assets that are owed to you.

Obama had difficulty providing a BC 'cause it would prove that he was born to a legitimate couple. Everyone knows you have to be natural born to be occupying the office of president but not too many realize that natural born at the time the constitution was written meant 'out of wedlock'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

Obama had difficulty providing a BC 'cause it would prove that he was born to a legitimate couple. Everyone knows you have to be natural born to be occupying the office of president but not too many realize that natural born at the time the constitution was written meant 'out of wedlock'.

---

Where do you find these little gems?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

Where do you find these little gems?

Inquiring minds want to know.

---

If you don't inquire you might never know.

Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·

March 17, 2019: Dear Mr. Trump

We hold the answer to all your monetary problems.

In return, we ask that the IRS be restricted to dunning actual Municipal Employees and Dependents and be severely penalized and punished for racketeering outside their appointed jurisdiction.

We also ask that all Territorial Employees including the District Attorneys and Postal Service Employees be fully informed of our return to the land and soil jurisdiction and that the need to issue proper identifications and passports be addressed promptly, so that our People are not constantly being mistaken for one or another kind of Federal Citizen.

Finally, we have found a means to amicably resolve the banking crisis.

Sincerely,
Anna Maria
(907) 250-5087
avannavon@gmail.com

Anna von Reitz
53 mins ·

More Sanctimonious Garbage from "Unknown Sources"

Virgo Triad has ignorantly slandered me and has supported efforts by others to do the same.

If anyone has to be worried about a slander suit, it's "Virgo Triad" and "Sun Tzu" (Jeff Dougherty) and all those other entities including the Southern Poverty Law Center (which has already lost $60 million because of their slander of others besides me) that have purposefully and inexcusably misrepresented who I am and what I teach and what I have done.

I say "inexcusably" because everything has been published and is available for examination. My books and my website fully demonstrate my knowledge and my teachings---- including what I don't teach and don't claim.

For example, I have never claimed to have any association with the State of Alaska. So by what form of gross insanity, would anyone try to make anything out of the fact that no, I don't have any association with the State of Alaska? Is this a surprise?

I have never been a member of the Bar Association, either. Why would I be? Just for the joy of paying Union dues?

Consider the sources. We are living in an era when these Vermin glorify falsehood --- when in fact, the Truth lasts forever and their words and their works are the transient and unimportant detritus of imagination and fraud.

I didn't expose the Great Fraud to tens of thousands of clergymen and politicians and bureaucrats for the pleasure of doing so. I do not continue this work and bring it forward to the masses so that the Great Fraud can continue on as status quo.

I did it -- and I do it -- because it had to be done, because a mammoth change must come, and it can hardly happen if nobody knows the history and nobody knows how anything is supposed to be run nor who is supposed to be served by the government.

Logically, step by step, I have pursued reform, restoration, and remedy for the people of this planet. Anyone who doesn't like reform, restoration, or remedy is welcome to get off my boat and swim for it.

Anna von Reitz
21 mins ·

Good News for Colored People

The research is done and the truth disclosed! Our States of the Union--- even the States of the Deep South--- never discriminated on the basis of race or skin color!

The requirement for State Citizenship is Free Man status.

Because many of those enslaved were black, a presumption grew up (and became "popular knowledge") that they were not eligible to serve as State Citizens because of their race or skin color, but instead it was the issue of enslavement and/or indentured servitude that kept many colored people from participating in actual State Government.

We have uncovered many substantial cases in which black Americans who had achieved their freedom from bondage went on to serve as State Citizens even in the Deep Southern States. We also have plenty of examples of Cherokee and Iroquois and other Natives serving as State Citizens.

The organizations that have discriminated against black Americans and Colored People of all variety, were the States of States --- mostly European-backed (and snobbish and class-conscious) private business enterprises that were not subject to popular opinion or practice.

So, all of those who have been digging for answers (as we have) can now rest assured that our republican states and States of the Union were not racially prejudiced.

This resolves one of the great dissonances that was self-evident from the beginning of this effort, and once again, we find that the problem was with the "States of States" calling themselves "States" --- and confusing their operations with our actual States of the Union. Just as they continue to try to do today.

Anyone of any color born on the soil of any state who claims their freedom as a "Free Man" --- that is, not under any obligation of Territorial or Municipal Citizenship--- is welcome to fully and freely participate in the State Assemblies and may hold Office as part of the State Assembly.

This underlines and justifies my faith in the logic and the meaning of all that the Founding Fathers expressed regarding Nature's Law and the Nature of Mankind.

Anna von Reitz
18 hrs ·

The Hornet's Nest

Let's begin by understanding that all Law comes from religion with "religion" being defined as a "recognizable set of beliefs and practices including ethical values accepted by adherents".

Most religions share what can be called "Universal Values".

In the realm of Universal Values we can list life as a value. Peace is also such a value, and so is freedom. Health is another Universal Value.
Justice, too, ranks among the Universal Values, as does Truth.

These are things that virtually all Mankind can agree upon as being good and truly valuable.

Now throw in a group of renegades who reject the Universal Values, and instead adopt the opposite set of Negative Values. To them, death is a Universal Value, war, disease, enslavement, injustice, and falsehood, are all to be sought after and upheld.

Why?
For profit.

Of course, they don't come right out and tell everyone their value system; for obvious reasons, they prefer to work in secret. Their corrosive hatred of life itself, fueled by lust and greed, leads them to seek positions as middlemen and purveyors of what everyone else seeks -- and which they despise.

Thus we have the upside down world: lawyers who know and care nothing about truth or justice or actual Law, doctors who know and care nothing about health or medicine, religious leaders who sell the gifts of God as "products" they have cornered the market on.

Last night I stirred up a hornet's nest by observing that the vermin among us have "redefined" marriage as a Joint Business Venture between corporate franchises, with the State of State organizations assuming a controlling Third Party "Secret Partner" position with a material interest in the "products" -- also known as children --- resulting in such licensed Joint Ventures.

This reduction of people to the status of things and of sacred private covenants to business arrangements, is part and parcel of the secret agenda of the Satanists among us, who seek to despoil everything for profit.

Our identity has been stolen. We have been impersonated. Our most sacred relationships have been salaciously "redefined". And who will defend us from this onslaught, if we will not wake up and defend ourselves and our children from it?

I have been asked --- as all these purported contracts are unconscionable, undisclosed, misrepresented, and fraudulent --- why can't we simply decree them all null and void?

We can do so immediately on a one-by-one basis, and on a far grander scale, albeit taking more time, we can create systemic correction also.
Obviously, the more people who choose to leave the Matrix of the Satanists and who reject their lies, the better for them and the better for all Mankind.

I need hardly take rhetorical reference to "Let my people go!" as those issues were decided long ago, and neither the institution of Noahide Law nor the other Gates of Hell will stand.

The most efficient means to secure an end to the Satanic System is to liquidate the corporations that have engaged in this criminality, return their ill-gotten gains to the victims, and not allow the perpetrators the privilege of forming any new, replacement corporations.

This is why I have been thumping on the Roman Curia for years and beating the Cardinals about the chops and ears.

It's their responsibility to ride herd on the corporations that they have created and to liquidate those that have operated as crime syndicates. It is also their duty to make sure that perpetrators of these evils are prevented from simply picking out a new deceptive name, booting up a new corporation, and carrying on business as usual.

The misanthropic and hideously criminal behavior of the corporations used by the Municipal United States Congress to act outside their designated jurisdiction is the direct responsibility of the Curia. The similar program offered by the Territorial United States Congress is the secondary responsibility of the Curia, which does have the authority to liquidate the British Crown and the Municipality of Westminster.

Now, the question reasonably arises, "But, but... but...." in the words of former Archbishop Francis Hurley, if such a housecleaning is to take place, what can reasonably replace the current System without occasioning chaos? And the possibility of even worse things, including the destabilization of the world balance of power?

We can all return to our lawful national governments and operate them as they should be operated. We can uphold the Public Law of our communities. We can lawfully convert the purloined property assets back to the ownership of those to whom they actually belong. We can gradually discharge the odious debts. We can convert the existing mechanisms to accomplish good instead of evil.

Just as our assets were unlawfully converted, they can be lawfully converted.

As it stands, DOD has discovered that the American States and People are owed the better part of $21 trillion dollars worth of credit. We are also owed the return of our gold, silver, and land assets free and clear of encumbrances. We are also owed our share of the $950 trillion dollars worth of "Life Force Value Annuities" collected by then-Prince Philip as our insurance against a derivative collapse. We are also owed the return of an estimated $387 billion dollars worth of gold confiscated from our parents and grandparents and great-grandparents by FDR and later purloined by the World Bank.

We are also owed the release of all the Birth Certificate Bonds and Child Labor Contracts issued under the Miller Act. We are owed the ownership and benefit from the stock portfolios and investments and investment funds operated "for" us. And in all respects, we are owed the return of our Good Names and Estates, and all derivative interests without any continued false claims in commerce or interference from the Hired Help.

Our unincorporated Holding Company, The United States of America, founded September 9, 1776, and our Federation of Member States, is still here, still in operation, still competently represented, still operates on the gold and silver standard, and is demanding the return of all our assets including our Good Names and Estates.

We are fully aware of the immensity of the undertaking implied and the switching of gears that is required, however, we have provided the means for people to return to the land and soil jurisdiction by their own volition and we anticipate that with continued expanding awareness, the return of our lawful assets can keep pace with any anticipated need for defense and reorganization culminating in the complete restoration and reconstruction of our Federal Government.

While this is all being sorted out and the necessary changes are being made, we are one-by-one rebutting the presumption of Federal Citizenship, and explicitly returning our Good Names to the land and soil jurisdiction of our birth States. We are also declaring the permanent domicile of all named DERIVATIVES and ACCOUNTS to be upon the land and soil of our State of the Union. These entities are thus returned to the realm of our Public Law and owed all benefits and protections of the Constitutions and underlying treaties and are not subject to any presumption of voluntary participation in commerce.

We have returned the Birth Certificates issued by the Municipal United States Congress attempting to "confer" their foreign citizenship upon us and have named the Secretary of the Treasury the Fiduciary responsible for discharging THEIR debts and also the Fiduciary responsible for issuing the credit and exemptions owed to our Lawful Persons.

Let the disbursement of credit owed and the discharge of the odious debt begin on a one-by-one basis until systemic correction can be completed.

The Birth Certificates remain as evidence of unconscionable contracting practices and crime committed against the civilian population of this country by the Territorial and Municipal Congresses who have at all times prior to and since the so-called Civil War owed us Good Faith Service and who have acted as criminals in Gross Breach of Trust with respect to the People of this country.

Let all Americans including those currently in Federal Civilian and Military Service and all Federal Agency personnel thus be advised: notice to principals is notice to agents, and notice to agents is notice to principals.

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

For All the Jural Assemblies - 45 Religion and State Assemblies

While it is each State's right to determine its day to day organizational course within the Public Law, the Organic Law, and the International Treaties we inherit, it requires negotiation with the other States and the convening of a Continental Congress to address issues of fundamental change.

Various religious groups have offered to take over and use the reins of the civilian government to promote their own beliefs and practices, which is a violation of the fundamental separation between church and state.

While the vast majority of our ancestors were Christian, most of them had suffered or had family members who suffered religious persecution. They well understood that giving the government any oversight at all of religion led to abuses of religious freedom. To secure and guarantee religious freedom for themselves, they guaranteed the same for everyone and set religion outside the purview of government.

As a result, our State Assemblies are not religious organizations, however dedicated the various people making up an Assembly may be to their faith and their views as a private matter.

Most State Assemblies traditionally have a Chaplain and open with a prayer or moment of silence allowing members to say a prayer prior to their business meetings --- a prudent and respectful practice that does not however suggest that the nature of the Assembly itself is anything but that of a secular and civilian government.

We need to observe that the present attempts to enslave everyone on this continent began with the successful re-enslavement of former Plantation slaves by the Territorial United States Government following the Civil War. In essence, the British-backed Territorial Government abolished private slave ownership with one hand, and institutionalized public slave ownership with the other hand.

Because we did not understand what they were doing and it did not affect us, we did not object, and this insidious form of enslavement originally applied to black Americans has eventually borne its cancerous fruit in the present attempt to enslave all Americans.

These abuses are typical of what happens when the coercive force of government is allowed to impinge upon any Natural Right, and the reason that the Founders placed such issues as free speech, religious freedom, and freedom of assembly beyond the reach of government. We would do well to remember the lessons they had already learned the hard way and to respect our history and our foundational principles.

It is also worth observing that by far the majority of the churches in this country took the bait and incorporated their operations as franchises of commercial corporations, thereby subjecting themselves to the International Jurisdiction of the Sea --- which is ruled by Satan.

If they were not wise enough to save themselves as churches, why should we assume that their leadership in the secular realm would be better informed?

Let each man and woman hold firmly to their best ethical standards and with Good Faith and common sense and clarity of purpose move forward together. We are assembling the actual States of the Union to restore our lawful civilian government, to conduct business that is long overdue, to enforce the Public Law, and to preserve our inheritance. To succeed, we need to keep focused.

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

The Power of the Paperwork -- Private v. Public Ownership

Do you own your own name? If not, it's high time that you did.

Once you own it, you get to define it and move it wherever you wish it to be.

So first you claim it, then you domicile it, then you dispose of it as you will. It's yours and the facts on the face of every Birth Certificate fully admit it.

The basic paperwork we use reclaims your Trade Name and permanently domiciles it on the land and soil of your birth state.

It can no longer be mistaken for an unidentified Foreign Situs Trust.

The basic paperwork also establishes your possession and control over all the derivatives, variations, permutations, orderings, styles, of similar Assumed Names/NAMES connected to you, and permanently domiciles them on the land and soil of your birth state, too.

The STRAWMAN can no longer be presumed to be a public trust or public transmitting utility residing in Puerto Rico. It is established and given Notice in the Public Record that the STRAWMAN is an American State asset.

As a result, it comes under new law and is a new lawfully-owned entity.
This is a process similar to re-flagging a ship.

This then also affects all contracts on which the NAME appears, including Driver Licenses, Mortgages, Loans, and Certificates.

To force recognition of this change in status may require you to take your paperwork and BC and Witness Testimonies to the District Attorney and properly inform him, but the facts and authority remain on your side.

You present the BC and the two Witness Testimonies to the District Attorney. These are private documents, so only his office needs to see them. This establishes the fact that you re the certificated owner/operator of the VESSELS. Then you provide certified copies of your recorded Deed of Reconveyance, etc.

You look the DA in the eye and you say, "I am not presenting this certificate for any purpose of identification. I know that you are operating under the 1934 Amendment to the Trading With the Enemy Act and that you cannot talk about it thanks to 18 USC 472, but I can talk about it to you. I act only in the capacity of a Lawful Person and lawful owner of American State vessels that are permanently domiciled on the land and soil of _______. (Your Birth State --- Ohio, Texas, California, etc.) I wish to apply my exemption and also wish for the exoneration of my pre-paid VESSELS and the elimination of this court contract. (That is, if a court case and charges are being misaddressed to you.)"

Then smile, leave a card with your contact information, and leave it all in the lap of the DA, who is supposed to be protecting you from racketeering.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

The US National Debt vs. The American States National Credit

The US National Debt is approximately 25 trillion dollars. This debt is owed by United States Citizens and Citizens of the United States.

Approximately 90% of this debt is owed to American State Citizens and American State Nationals, with the remainder being trade deficits and other forms of debt owed to other countries, primarily to China.

The DOD has discovered a credit of approximately 21 trillion dollars on its books. This is the National Credit owed to the American States and People.

This credit accrued over nearly a hundred years during which generations of Americans exchanged their labor and goods for I.O.U.'s issued by the Federal Reserve.

When the DOD issues a Credit Voucher to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to offset Debts presented for payment by American State Nationals or American State Citizens, the US National Debt is decreased by the amount of the Voucher.

If, however, DOD issues a Credit Voucher to pay off Debts presented for payment by United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, the net effect is to increase the US National Debt, plus additional interest.

When our National Credit is accessed by American State Nationals and American State Citizens and applied to their debts, the US National Debt decreases and US Credit Rating is restored.

As this National Credit is already accrued, allowing American State Nationals and American State Citizens to access it does not represent any new expense or burden to the US. It's simply bookkeeping which needs to be done and which relieves everyone of debt.

It relieves American State Nationals and American State Citizens of odious debts by canceling those debts using already accrued National Credit, and it relieves United States Citizens and Citizens of the United States of their National Debt burden at the same time.

Everyone wins. Nobody loses. So why isn't it being done as of yesterday?

Answer: first, many American State Nationals and American State Citizens were being deliberately misidentified as United States Citizens and/or Citizens of the United States, making them ineligible to receive the Credit Offset.

Second, many United States Citizens and Citizens of the United States continued to mindlessly indebt themselves, racking up not only debt, but interest charges.

Third, although the Department of Defense did ultimately come clean about the existence of the National Credit, they have not had the authority to correct the situation.

Only we, the living people, have the answer: everyone who is eligible to reclaim their birthright political status as American State Nationals and American State Citizens, do so.

Do the paperwork we've outlined, record your claims, when you are finished with those steps, go to our new website, SignInAmerica.net, as soon as it is available, sign up to receive more information and then collect evidence of debt owed by the STRAWMAN --- mortgages, college loans, utility bills, wherever the name of the STRAWMAN account shows up.

These are all debts that are owed mutual offset credit exchange--- that is, cancellation by Credit Voucher.
As these debts are cancelled against the National Credit that Americans are already owed---and have already earned---the US National Debt burden is relieved as a result of the same transaction.

Win-Win, one by one.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

Anyone Who Calls Me "Mrs. Belcher" Had Better Be Prepared...

I don't allow anyone to mistake me for the wife of a British Merchant Mariner and anyone who makes that mistake is likely to have his Legal Teeth shoved right back down his throat.

I am not a "Misses" or "Mrs."

You all may be, especially idiots like Sun-Tzu and Destry Payne, but not me and not mine. We are Americans through and through, not Brits and not British employees, and not Municipal Trademarks, either.

We own it all. And we have the evidence to ream every single corporation in sight, including all the LLC's.

So--- like it, lump it, believe it, or don't --- the facts are the facts and we hold the keys.

You are all invited to take your clueless sophomoric "analysis" which demonstrates your ignorance of the legal jargon and also the commercial processes involved and stick it where the sun don't shine.

Sincerely,
Anna Maria

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

The Service Contract(s)

So now Thomas Deegan and Destry Payne and fake-book fake-news "Sun Tzu" have taken to championing cancellation of the Service Contract(s).

We already did that, with complete Due Process, five (5) years ago.

Their answer amounts to --- five years too late --- stand in the rain like turkeys and drown.

Mr. Trump has a month-to-month quid pro quo from the only people with the standing to give it to him, and that is all there is.

People who are too dim to figure out where they belong and which team jersey they should wear and what -- if anything -- is the Enemy besides their own ignorance, do nothing but obstruct progress toward solutions that work for everyone.

If Deegan wants to live in a hole and call himself the Fairie King, let him. If Destry wants to live his life as a Dual Citizen of "the US" and Luxembourg, let him. If Sun-Tzu wants to pretend that he is an ancient oriental military expert instead of a flakker living in Portland, well, there are stranger things.

But never doubt that I know exactly who I am and who I am not, and while I know that--- know this: we are twenty years ahead of all of them and gaining steam every day.

Anna von Reitz
10 hrs ·

BC Witnesses

I am getting a lot of questions, especially from older readers whose parents have died and who have fewer and fewer direct witnesses to their birth and identity. It gets harder as you get older to be able to find such witnesses, but if we scratch our heads a bit there are usually plenty of people who have cause to know who we are and where we come from and know our family ties. Anyone who has known you a significant (7 years or more) period of time and who knows your family and background may serve as a Witness.

That may include:
1. Family members;
2. Friends, including friends from school;
3. Religious officials;
4. Co-workers;
5. Employers;
6. Public officials -- sheriffs, librarians, etc.

Because today's world works on photo identifications, you will need a small color or black and white photo of yourself copied onto the paper that your Witnesses will sign. I am providing a fictitious example of the verbiage for a typical BC Witness Testimony below.

Remember that living people cannot give Affidavits ---- only Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit. So if you are not acting as a corporation or a corporate officer, never label anything you submit for any court or public record an "Affidavit".

Witness Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit
1. "I, Joanne Felicity Adams, a living woman now living at 345 Howe Street, Lampasas, Texas,
2. have first-hand knowledge that Joseph Allen Bates whose photograph appears hereon and who now lives in Akron, Ohio,
3. is the man who was born on July 1, 1949 in Coopertown, Michigan,
4. and from without the United States and under the penalties of perjury under the public law of The United States of America,
5. I do affirm this to be the truth.
6. This Witness Testimony is granted freely, without coercion or payment of any kind,
7. and so say I to all facts above this ____ day of _________ in the year ___________
8. and I have affixed my signature in affirmation of these facts before these Witnesses:
By: __________________________________ (c) Joanne Felicity Adams, LS

Witness of Public Notary to Signature
Lampasas County
Texas

Today I was visited by Joanne Felicity Adams and she did present appropriate identification and she did provide this Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit freely and without coercion before me and she did also freely sign this Testimony without coercion in my presence this _____ day of __________ in Witness whereof my hand and seal appear:
By: _____________________________________Public Notary; my commission expires on: ____________________.

****Obviously, in the case of women who have married and changed their names you will need to add reference to the birth name---- something to the effect:
"I have first-hand knowledge that Betty Jo Boop now living in Santa Monica, California, was born Betty Jo Melankamp in Cooperstown, Michigan, on July 1, 1950....." *****

Please also note that it is okay for Witnesses to come from other places than where you now live. An old High School pal may live in West Virginia and you may live in Los Angeles. The only difficulty is that when you talk to them and ask you to do you this favor, you will need to ask the name of the county where they will get the Notary done so that you can complete the Notary information correctly.

Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·

No, It's Not "Simple", But..... It Is Do-Able

The situation with the US National Debt being cancelled by the American States National Credit is basically simple bookkeeping, but the process of verifying and collecting the information and discharging debts owed to millions of Americans is not.

It is to be hoped that as the Dim among us realize that they are stepping on their own penile structures by attempting to obstruct, co-opt, and otherwise sideline our return to the land and soil (they assume that that means their debt will increase and so we have to be stopped, when in fact it means their debt will be relieved) this process will get simpler and less contentious.

Although we have striven mightily to streamline and simplify the paperwork and have reduced it all down to just a few simple moves, and even though we are still working hard to automate the process --- it's still work, and it still requires people to gain new knowledge and make decisions and scrabble around correcting their records.

Once that is done, they have to do some more scrabbling --- and collect the evidence of the STRAWMAN'S debt, have to open a private bank account, have to apply for the Voucher(s) and permit the DOD to issue them, and there are plenty of questions that remain.

For example, what about mortgages we already paid off? What about federal income taxes we never owed in the first place? What about ongoing utility bills and charges addressed to the STRAWMAN?

No, this is not 'simple", but once the military gets out of its own way and thoroughly understands the benefits to them as well as everyone else, and the people of this country wake up and those who are eligible to reclaim their birthright political status do so --- we can all enjoy a fantastic amount of debt relief.

It may be possible for the DOD to simply return the whole credit to The United States of America [Unincorporated] and "instantly" erase the bulk of the US National Debt. I am sure Mr. Trump would like that very much. It would then be our responsibility (and pleasure) to work out the details of cancelling debts for millions of Americans with the Comptroller of the Currency and Secretary of State Pompeo.

On the topic of NATIONAL DEBT the total now stands at $346,681,016 as it has since 1878. This is the remainder of the debt incurred by Lincoln in his process of subjugating the southern states. It hasn't been cancelled. It is impossible to pay off since the present government has no obligation to repay it and has established a policy for Treasury to issue greenbacks should anyone attempt to repay this debt in order to maintain the debt at precisely that level.

If you want to avoid your share of the trillions of debt owed by the socialist government you just might want to acknowledge the debt owed by the government that vaporized itself in 1868 instead.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

On the topic of NATIONAL DEBT the total now stands at $346,691,016 as it has since 1878. This is the remainder of the debt incurred by Lincoln in his process of subjugating the southern states. It hasn't been cancelled. It is impossible to pay off since the present government has no obligation to repay it and has established a policy for Treasury to issue greenbacks should anyone attempt to repay this debt in order to maintain the debt at precisely that level.

If you want to avoid your share of the trillions of debt owed by the socialist government you just might want to acknowledge the debt owed by the government that vaporized itself in 1868 instead.

---

When you declare a debt, you issue a corresponding credit. If the debt is still in effect so is the credit. To get back to zero, a place no doubt near and dear to you, requires matching it to the existing credit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

When you declare a debt, you issue a corresponding credit. If the debt is still in effect so is the credit. To get back to zero, a place no doubt near and dear to you, requires matching it to the existing credit.

---

There you go acting like a CPA. If the credit is fiction then so is the debt. Neither are real (really!!!).

Wimpy: I would gladly pay you Wednesday for a hamburger today.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

There you go acting like a CPA. If the credit is fiction then so is the debt. Neither are real (really!!!).

Wimpy: I would gladly pay you Wednesday for a hamburger today.

---

Sorry, but no cigar, that is our money system today. It's all you get to spend. Credits spend and cancel debts.

Are you a Jew? That is their game keep all the credit for themselves and leave all the debt for the goy's.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

Sorry, but no cigar, that is our money system today. It's all you get to spend. Credits spend and cancel debts.

---

There is nothing in a FRN which is able to extinguish a debt. Discharge is the order of the day.

Isn't it a big presumption that it is OUR money system?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

Are you a Jew? That is their game keep all the credit for themselves and leave all the debt for the goy's.

---

I claim Hebrew heritage being of Danish descent (Tribe of D(a)n). And I know of no money-lender that agrees to let the borrower set the rules for repayment. Is that considered to be a Jewish trait?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

There is nothing in a FRN which is able to extinguish a debt. Discharge is the order of the day.

Isn't it a big presumption that it is OUR money system?

I claim Hebrew heritage being of Danish descent (Tribe of D(a)n). And I know of no money-lender that agrees to let the borrower set the rules for repayment. Is that considered to be a Jewish trait?

---

I always redeem lawful money, so even though they are green they supposedly are US notes.

I guess you did not get the right OUR.

So you too have something in common with Carl (with a C, which is not Dansk Karl) Skyvike von Andersen?

The point is never borrow money from a Jew.

If 'Judge' Anna was a *real* threat she'd get locked up incommunicado just like Schaeffer Cox.

Does anyone know how and why 'Judge' Anna calls herself a judge?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnight rambler

Does anyone know how and why 'Judge' Anna calls herself a judge?

---

We are all judges. In a Republic when you find a vacant office you can occupy it. For example, Obama happened to be wandering the halls of the white house and discovered an office that Bush had just vacated.

The office of Article III judge is occupied by nobody at the federal level.

The office of coroner is vacant in many counties. A medical examiner is not a coroner. This leaves the sheriff without anyone to be accountable to.

Quote:

---

In a Republic when you find a vacant office you can occupy it.

---

Aren't those elected positions you refer to?

The district that Anna claims to be the judge in does not exist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnight rambler

Aren't those elected positions you refer to?

---

Elected by whom? Some 14th amendment statutory slave? Hardly binding.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnight rambler

The district that Anna claims to be the judge in does not exist.

---

Ahhh, existence. Ification is the process of being. Being is the process of changing. I try hard not to be impressed with the illusions that motivate crowds that get drunk on social welfare and Oxycontin. We are endowed with five senses. If none of them work to produce a direct stimulus that the brain can interpret then likely we are discussing inner workings of the brain to produce an illusion of something that has no existence.

Anna tells how she got to be a Judge.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

For All The Jural Assemblies - 13 Judges, Justices, and Hired Jurists / Judge Anna Blows the Whistle on the Whistleblowers
Imagine an apple. The apple has a skin, and inside the skin, it has sweet juicy flesh. You can't get to the flesh without piercing the skin.

It is the same way with the land and soil jurisdiction we are heir to.

The "soil" is the top six inches of the land, like the skin on the apple.

All the rest deeper than six inches is "land" --- the flesh of the apple.

By definitions long established, the soil comprises the National Jurisdiction of the States, and is managed by our unincorporated Counties.

The land comprises the International Land Jurisdiction of the States and is managed by our unincorporated State Jural Assemblies.

Land and soil are inextricably bonded together, like the skin and flesh of an apple. That is why we speak of "the land and soil" of Wisconsin or Virginia or Texas.

That is why when you become a State Jural Assembly Member, the County Jural Assembly is also created, and vice-versa.

Our Ancestors were determined that no king or government was going to control their lives again, so they made the County-- the skin of the apple --- the fundamental political unit and supreme political jurisdiction in the American Government.

Strange but true, the County Sheriff elected by the County Jural Assembly Members is the top Public Law Official in the country. Within the physical boundaries of his County, he is the embodiment of the Public Law and its chief enforcer.

Because he works for the soil jurisdiction, the actual County Sheriff is a "Peacekeeping Official" and not a "Law Enforcement Officer". See the difference?

Peacekeepers work for the people, the land and the soil.
Law Enforcement Officers work for "persons" --- the corporations and their shareholders operating as incorporated States of State, like the "State of Ohio".

We have been well and thoroughly confused and duped into thinking that their "County Sheriff" is our "County Sheriff", when in fact an unlawful conversion has taken place.

Many of those operating our Counties back in the 1960's took the bait of "Federal Block Grants" and elected to incorporate the unincorporated Counties they were working for.

In doing so, they unwittingly removed and converted the actual County Government into mere commercial corporations operated as franchises --- like Dairy Queen franchises of Territorial and Municipal corporations.

They handed over our sovereignty "for us" in exchange for racketeering kickbacks.

Ironically, we are fortunate that those same people who voted for the unlawful conversion of the Counties were already unwittingly functioning as incorporated "persons", so had no authority to give away our Counties. They were merely employees of ours.
They had already "vacated" their natural capacity as unincorporated Jurors.

Many Counties tried to have it both ways and kept the unincorporated County running and simply set up a corporation calling itself something similar -- like, "The County of Jackson" instead of "Jackson County", so that the offered federal kickbacks could be laundered through "The County of Jackson".

This set up a situation where County Officials were, for a time --- and some still are--- operating in two separate capacities. The Sheriff elected to the unincorporated soil jurisdiction office simply put on a different hat as the occasion demanded, and functioned as the "Sheriff" of the incorporated "County", too.

But our ancestors set it up so that no man can serve two masters.

The problem is that our actual Counties are political subdivisions of our States and they occupy an entirely different jurisdiction --- that of the land and soil -- which does not recognize or tolerate any form of "Dual Citizenship" at all.

The land and soil jurisdiction of this country does not allow us to operate in incorporated and unincorporated capacity at the same time. It's one way or the other.
Either you operate as the actual Sheriff of the unincorporated County and State, or you operate as a "Sheriff" of an incorporated "County" franchise of a State of State. See the difference?

There is a Macon County Sheriff working for Georgia, the actual State, and then, out of the blue, there's suddenly a "County of Macon" and the "Sheriff" of the "County of Macon" is working for the [Territorial] "State of Georgia", instead.

Sleight of hand. Presto-Change-O! One minute you are standing on the land and soil and your County Sheriff is your County Sheriff, and the next he is a patsy working for a foreign corporation. Go figure.

In the years since all that happened, things have gotten even more balled up, and we've added another layer of this incorporation scam. Instead of working for the Territorial State of State, the man who appears to be working as your County Sheriff may be working for a Municipal STATE OF STATE corporation, instead.

These moonlighting "Sheriffs" and other "County" Officials are --for the most part unwittingly -- functioning as impostors -- appearing to be land and soil jurisdiction County Sheriffs and County Officials, when in fact they are being paid by foreign corporations and not standing on the land and soil jurisdiction of this country at all.

And this explanation actually does pertain to the main topic, which is Judges, Justices, and Hired Jurists.
All the people you see inhabiting what appear to be your Courts are Hired Jurists, and they will admit it.

Go ahead and ask them. Walk up to any of the State of State Judges or Municipal STATE OF STATE Judges and ask them the question: "Are you a Hired Jurist?" ---- and they will tell you, why, yes, I am.

They will be surprised that you asked, but the vast majority will answer truthfully.

The same scams and unlawful conversions that I just described with the County Sheriffs apply to the Judges, Justices, and Hired Jurists, too.
99.9% of the members of the Bar Associations are not qualified to act as actual Judges or as Justices, either one.
In the course of the long researches that led up to this moment, we surveyed the "Judges" operating in both the Territorial States of States and the Municipal STATES OF STATES courts, and out of approximately ten thousand of these Hired Jurists, we found one (1) guy in Wisconsin who was actually qualified to act as an actual Judge in a Public Court---- if and when he elects to reclaim his natural and unincorporated status as a Member of the Wisconsin Jural Assembly.

The rest of these people are just Hired Guns, working in private quasi-military and private corporation tribunals.
Instead of being employed by the actual unincorporated State or County as actual Judges and actual Justices,, they were suddenly reduced to the capacity of being Hired Jurists in the employ of foreign corporations doing business as
either Territorial States of States Courts or Municipal STATES OF STATES COURTS.

The California Courts ceased to function and the incorporated Territorial State of California Courts and the incorporated Municipal STATE OF STATE COURTS took over the "Judicial Functions"---- but the actual unincorporated Courts owed to the People of California and the people of each County in California, disappeared. Overnight.

And that is why you can't find justice in this country anymore.

Both the Territorial State of State and the Municipal STATE OF STATE are for-profit organizations in the business of providing governmental services. The service they are providing tends to be racketeering aimed at fleecing the actual living people out of their assets for the benefit of their respective corporations.

And their Hired Jurists, are, after all, working for them, and not occupying any Public Office ---- so what the hey?

They get away with what they can get away with.

I had a moment of supreme irony the other day. One of my supporters was trying to explain why I am not a member of the Bar Association in Alaska and why in fact I couldn't be a member of the Bar and serve in the capacity that I am serving.

He made the error of describing me as a "common law jurist", as if I were a Hired Jurist --- only operating a common law court like counterparts in the State of Alaska are operating commercial corporation courts.

Closer, but still no banana.
The Alaska Statehood Compact created a "National Trust" for Alaska operated as the Alaska State. That National Trust contains the land and soil jurisdiction of Alaska, even if Alaska has not yet been formally enrolled as a State in the Union. Therefore, I, as one of the People of this country, can invoke and fill the empty Public Office of Alaska State Judge or Justice or Justice of the Peace (at the County level).

When we realized the scam being played our research led us to the old Government Land Office and the discovery that although Counties were mapped out and designated in Alaska at the time of Statehood, the land and soil jurisdiction of the State were never occupied. In a sense, our State did not exist, except as a National Trust laid out on paper.

It was up to us to choose to act in our unincorporated capacity as County and State Jural Assembly Members, to occupy our State and our County, to hold our elections and conduct our business as the lawful Inheritors of the National Trust and the land and soil jurisdiction owed to Alaska and Alaskans.

There were only a dozen or so of us up to speed to begin with, so it was a matter of staring at each other in disbelief, going through the motions, and everyone electing each other to different land and soil jurisdiction Public Offices, all of us serving as State Citizens.

Fortunately, it doesn't matter how many or how few qualified State Jural Assembly Members there are for the land and soil jurisdiction to be occupied. Even one (1) qualified Elector operating in their unincorporated capacity prevents the corporations from claiming "exclusive legislative" control --- a condition that would leave us with no land and soil jurisdiction to stand upon and result in the collapse of our country and our States.

I filled the Public Office of Alaska State Superior Court Judge. See the difference? Alaska State Superior Court Judge ---- not "State of Alaska" Superior Court Judge.
"Alaska" and the "Alaska State" National Trust were not "abandoned" and no "exclusive legislative" hegemony was achieved by the usurping commercial corporations as a result.

The actual State and People have survived by the skin of their teeth, much to the consternation and annoyance of the foreign commercial corporations that have labored so long and so hard to take over our country, steal our resources, and enslave our people for their profit.

At the County level, the people are served by "Justices of the Peace". At the State level, the people are also served by "Justices" as in "Justices of the Supreme Court". Also at the State level, because not all of the State's international jurisdiction was ever delegated away, we have "Judges".

All the "persons" are served by Hired Jurists arbitrarily calling themselves "Judges" or "Justices", none of whom are holding any valid Public Office in the American Government at all.

So the additional irony is that I am an actual Judge holding an actual elected Public Office approved by the people of this State, and I am the one being accused of "lying" and being a "fake Judge".

There are some people who are so stupid or so evilly anti-American, that they can't note the difference between "Ohio", "Ohio State", "State of Ohio" and "STATE OF OHIO", even when you point it out and explain the difference to them.

The fact that there are, as a result of these different entities----
both unincorporated and incorporated---- multiple court systems in play, also passes them by.

Obviously, too, those who work for these foreign corporations and whose jobs depend upon them, are motivated to continue this scam and this effort to undermine the people and their government, just as the living people have an interest (once they are alerted to it) to regain their unincorporated status.

I am willfully serving the People of Alaska, instead of the Persons of Alaska.

The reason that I have not been arrested and charged with "impersonating a Judge" is that those who would have to bring the charges are in fact impersonating our Judges --- and as Hired Jurists, they know it.

Strange and incredible as it may seem, I'm not the Fake Judge here. They are. Just as our elected County Sheriffs are the actual Sheriffs and their "Sheriffs" are just stand-ins, calling themselves "Sheriffs" but acting in completely
different and foreign capacities.

Now, with all of this in view, listen to this clap-trap from the "Southern Poverty Law Center" ---- which I have famously observed is not "Southern" has nothing to do with "Poverty" and is a "Legal" Center having nothing to do with the actual Public Law --- and you will see what we are up against, both in terms of
bare-faced lies and misrepresentations and in terms of vicious self-interest on the part of these groupies feeding off the corporate court system.

http://thewhistleblowers.info/warning-anna-maria-riezinger…/

Please also note the deliberate mis-characterization of me as a "Sovereign Citizen"---- which is a meaningless oxymoron. It is impossible to be a "Citizen" and a "Sovereign" at the same time, thus these ignorant people --- who are claiming to be experts in the "Law" while offering "Legal Services", continue to act as Ignoramuses and to mislead people so as to prevent them from knowing and exercising their true power as State Jural Assembly Members.

And thus also prevent us from restoring the government we are owed and keep us from acting in our natural capacities and seek to usurp our Public Offices and replace them with employees of their foreign, for-profit "governmental services corporations" instead.

Wise as serpents and gentle as doves, folks. The ignorance we are surrounded with in the general populace is thick enough to cut with a knife. The guile and evil of the men actually "in the know" who are orchestrating all this is also not to be underestimated.

Once you know who you are and how your actual government is supposed to operate-- and in which jurisdiction your actual government exists, you will realize how we have all been played and what you have to do to correct it.

Reclaim your natural unincorporated political status, re-populate your unincorporated land and soil jurisdiction State, and, as members of the State Jural Assembly, occupy your "vacated" actual Public Offices ---- including the County Justices of the Peace, the State Justices and the State Judges.

I guarantee that the phonies working as Hired Jurists won't have a word to say about it.

I

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

We are all judges. In a Republic when you find a vacant office you can occupy it. For example, Obama happened to be wandering the halls of the white house and discovered an office that Bush had just vacated.The office of Article III judge is occupied by nobody at the federal level.The office of coroner is vacant in many counties. A medical examiner is not a coroner. This leaves the sheriff without anyone to be accountable to.

---

The Court of Appeals ffor the Federal Circuit claims to be established by Atricle III of the Constitution in 1982. Are the judges Article III judges? According to their webpage yes:

Quote:

---

The judges of the court are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. Judges are appointed to the court for life under Article III of the Constitution of the United States. There are twelve judges in active service. When eligible, judges may elect to take senior status, which permits them to continue to serve on the court while handling fewer cases than a judge in active service. Each judge in active service employs a judicial assistant and up to four law clerks, while each judge in senior status employs a judicial assistant and one law clerk.

---

http://cafc.uscourts.gov/the-court/court-jurisdiction

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

The judges of the court are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate.

---

uh huh. So an independent judiciary is composed of judges picked by the executive branch and approved by the legislative branch?

I don't think so.

You might want to refer to AmJur 2d for administrative law. It is described as the 4th branch of government. Hard to imagine a 4th branch of government when there are only 3 branches under the constitution.

So then look at Bill of Attainder. It is prohibited because it represents the legislative branch telling the judicial branch what the punishments are for various crimes. A bill of pains and punishments is a less lethal version of a bill of attainder. What is objectionable about these is they shortcut the separation of powers between branches.

Any structure that crosses branch lines is a bill of attainder. And that includes administrative agencies.

Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 2:43 PM ·

Anatomy of a Birth Certificate - What It Means

Take a look at the Birth Certificate issued in your NAME.

What's the first thing you notice?

It's on funny paper: hard surfaced, durable, heavy paper called "bond paper". This is your first clue that your estate has been seized upon and that bonds--- that is, promissory notes--- have been issued against your name.

The next thing that will probably catch your eye is that there are all sorts of seals and blazons and watermarks on this piece of paper. It carries all sorts of emblems from a "State of State" organization, depending on where and when you were born.

We know from our study of the history that these organizations are all foreign with respect to us, as our own American State of State organizations have been moth-balled since the Civil War.

Look at the BC issued in your name. It will show either a Territorial State of State with its name written in Upper and Lower Case like this: State of Washington, or a Municipal STATE OF STATE written in All Capitals like this: STATE OF IOWA.

All these seals and watermarks and other gee-gaws serve to identify the "Issuer" of the Birth Certificate, which is the foreign State of State Organization, not you. They are identifying your NAME as property belonging to them, which they are issuing bonds against.

The next thing you will most likely notice is that your name is spelled out in All Capital Letters, and that, most likely, other words appear in All Capital Letters.

According to the Bar Association Manual and the Government Printing Office and Federal Bureau of Engraving and Black's Law Dictionary and the Chicago Manuel of Style, the only things that can be named using All Capital Letters are: (1) Corporations or (2) Dead men's estates.

The All Capitals names are a form of Latin called "Dog Latin".
So, look at your name as it appears in All Capitals on that Birth Certificate.

Are they issuing bonds against a Dead Man's Estate? Or against a corporation?

If your name appears like this: JOHN ALLEN DOE, the bonds have been issued against your ESTATE on the presumption that you donated it to the State of State or STATE OF STATE Organization.

If your name appears like this: JOHN A. DOE, the bonds have been issued against a PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY franchise on the presumption that you donated that to the State of State or STATE OF STATE Organization.

In either case, obviously, so far as you know you didn't donate anything to any of these yahoos and you are not aware of having given them permission to bond your estate or any public transmitting utility, either. It all sounds bizzare, doesn't it?

But there is the evidence in your hand.

Now, who is the Birth Certificate Bond signed by? The Registrar. The Registrar is an Officer of the Probate Court. The appearance of their signature on "your" Birth Certificate is absolute proof that your property --- whether your ESTATE or your PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY --- has been probated and seized upon as property belonging to the State of State or STATE OF STATE that issued the Birth Certificate.

Now look at the dates on the face of the Birth Certificate. You will see your actual birthday and also a file date ---- the "birthdate". These refer to the actual event of your birth, and then, some days or weeks later, the "filing" of the paperwork to either (1) pronounce "you" dead and create your ESTATE; or (2) to create "your" PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY.

Either way, you arrived first and have first right of recall and ownership, known as a reversionary trust interest in your own Good Name and assets.

After all, you are being misrepresented as the "donor" of all these assets and the State of State is claiming to be the beneficiary of your largesse.
Having discovered this "mistake" made by your Mother when you were just a baby in your cradle, you have a right to come forward and correct it upon discovery.

What else does the Birth Certificate represent?

It is evidence of crime against you and fraud and non-disclosure against your mother.

It is evidence of attempting to contract with and establish "unconscionable contract" with an infant.

An "unconscionable contract" is a contract that you literally are not aware of. And how could a little baby be aware of a contract made "for" him when he was only a few days old, by a new Mother who was never given full disclosure about those papers she was signing at the hospital? She couldn't explain to you what she was never given to understand herself, could she?

The BC is potent evidence of crime.

Now, what are you going to do with it / about it?

The first thing you are going to do is secure two Witness Testimonies from people who have "reasonable first hand knowledge" of you and your family, who can affirm that you are "the" living man or woman whose birth occurred at such and such a time and place and to your parents, etc.

This establishes the fact that you are the presumed "Donor" of the property referenced by the BC and also establishes your standing to sue these criminals.

Next, if you follow our advice, you will complete the paperwork to return your Trade Name (also known as your Good Name and Given Name -- "John Allen Doe" in Upper and Lower Case) to the land and soil jurisdiction of your birth State.

This process explicitly demonstrates--- and recording of the action proves--- that you, the presumed Donor, are acting as a Lawful Person, not a Legal Person.

This puts you outside their jurisdiction, so they can no longer "presume" anything about you.

Next, having secured your Trade Name and having permanently domiciled it on the land and soil jurisdiction State, you will Expatriate from any presumed political status as a Territorial Citizen (like someone born in Puerto Rico) or Municipal CITIZEN (created in the Municipality of Washington, DC, for example).

And you will revoke all Prior Powers of Attorney and name your Lawful Person ---John Allen Doe, in this example--- as the only Attorney-in-Fact authorized to do business for you and your estate.

Finally, you will seize upon all the other Assumed Names and NAMES that are or could be associated with you in any regard, and all their variations and permutations and orderings and styles, and you will use a recorded Certificate of Assumed Name(s) to claim them and permanently domicile all of them on the land and soil of your State of the Union, too.

This last is a process like re-flagging a ship. Instead of "sailing" under the auspices of the British Territorial Government or the Municipal Government of Washington, DC, you are now demonstrably sailing under the auspices of Maine or California or whatever other actual land and soil jurisdiction State.

This also puts your Good Name and all the "derivative" NAMES under the Pubic Law, so that you are no longer subject to the codes and statutory laws and "public policies" of the foreign State of State or STATE OF STATE Organizations.

In sum total, at the end of this process, you have: (1) damning conclusive evidence of their wrong-doing against a baby; (2) proof of your ownership of your name and your standing; (3) proof of your political status; (4) proof that you are the only authorized Power of Attorney; (5) proof that any "vessels" related to you stand under the Public Law and are not subject to any presumption or interpretation otherwise.

You still have to learn how to use these documents in your defense and be able to describe this whole circumstance, but taken together they form a competent rebuttal and evidence trail removing you from any "US citizenship" status, and returning you to your rightful status as an American State National.

And again --- why is all this necessary? Because your identity has been stolen. The Birth Certificate you hold in your hand is irrefutable evidence of the facts.

You were deliberately misidentified as a baby as either a "United States Citizen" [Territorial] or "Citizen of the United States" [Municipal] and unless you rebut the evidence, you will be claimed as chattel belonging as a property asset to one of these foreign commercial crime syndicates.

For additional insight, I recommend the YouTube videos of Jordan Maxwell and any and all lectures regarding the "Justinian Deception" --- the use of Dog Latin--- by Romley Stewart.

Time is of the essence and numbers count, as these crime syndicates know that they have been discovered and that their system has been deconstructed, so that they either make amends or are destroyed by liquidation or worse.

Please join the effort, correct your records, [for Do It Yourself Help go to PaperUpNow.com or see Article 928 on my website, www.annavonreitz.comor see the Help Service portal about midway down my website home page to request additional help] and then go to our new sign in service:

signinamerica.com.

SignInAmerica is an organizational tool to help us identify and as much as possible pre-qualify Americans who have corrected their political status to receive Credit Vouchers to offset debts of the STRAWMAN entities that have been created "in their names".

Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 12:00 AM ·

An Apology to Robert

Most of the time I am patient and explain things as well as I can and as often as necessary, but once in a while, I lose my temper --- just get worn down and pop off at someone who hits me at the wrong moment with something that has been a cause of irritation for days or months or even years. This recently happened with Robert and I would like to apologize.

He wrote to me about the issue of "Affidavits of Truth".
He assumed that I was using Certificates to replace Affidavits and referenced an article of mine where I explained that living people who are acting in their unincorporated Lawful Person capacity can't make Affidavits ----- only corporations (like franchises) or officers of corporations can make Affidavits. The rest of us must label our presentations as "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit".

This is part of the Court Rules and part of the reason that our Testimony doesn't get heard in Court. Another reason is that too many people file their paperwork with the Court Clerk and don't file it with the Prosecutor directly and with the District Attorney.

They aren't obliged to accept your Testimony, read it, react to it or respond to it until and unless you label it properly for what it is and present it to them. Directly.

There is a difference between an "Affidavit" and "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit", just as there is a difference between a "State of State" and an actual "State".

I get worn out trying to teach people who don't read things closely enough to notice these differences for themselves, and I can get really frustrated with those who still don't notice these things AFTER I have pointed them out.

If a man asserts that he is operating exclusively as a Lawful Person and is owed exemption and exoneration, but then turns around and submits an "Affidavit" instead of a "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit" he has presented conflicting information.

He is claiming to act in one capacity and then, by submitting an "Affidavit of Truth" instead of "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit" is demonstrating that he is in fact operating in a completely different capacity. It's like a Colonel in the Army showing up in full dress uniform and claiming that he's a civilian.

If we are going to deal competently with the many issues facing this country, we must all learn to read things much more closely, with more attention to what the words actually say and how things are labeled and named.

So, I am sorry for losing my temper, Robert. It was just the straw that broke the camel's back after months of trying to draw people's attention to similar facts:

A State is not a State of State.

A State of State is not a STATE OF STATE.

An Affidavit is not Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit.

A United States Citizen is not a Citizen of the United States.

An American State National is not a US Citizen.

The United State [Unincorporated] is not the United States, Inc.

The United States of America [Unincorporated] is not the USA, Inc.

Indictments are not Presentments.

A Republican State is not a Republic, etc., etc., etc...

As confusing as the rats have made this, I actually have great sympathy with people who are threading their way through the maze and who care enough to do so.

I'm sorry, Robert. Please forgive me for being Grandma Grump.

Anna von Reitz
22 hrs ·

Who to Trust?

I often get asked who among the various sources should be trusted as reliable --- and the answer is that none of us get it 100% right a 100% of the time. Including me.

Nor are we all "perfect" in all venues and respects, because everyone that I mention has their specialties and tends to work in some particular jurisdiction of the law or arena of historical inquiry. Some are focused on private relief and others are more focused on general relief/restoration of a proper lawful government and still others are focused on some particular historical research period.

So when I make a recommendation like this it is with a built in caveat emptor, in that you have to know or learn where the pieces of the puzzle fit and define what your own needs are.

In terms of people/sources who reliably make the Good Faith Effort besides my own team and who dig up good nuggets of Truth with the consistency of Truffle Pigs, I would include [in no particular order]:

Rod Class -- PAGs and Administrative Law

Kelby Smith of HISAdvocates -- Private Living

Jean Keating -- Maritime and Admiralty Law

Mark Emery -- Private Living

Kurt Kallenbach - Paramount Claims of Life, History, DNA

Romley Stewart - History, DOG LATIN, Fraud Investigation

Neo - Statutory Law and Practical Quick Fixes

Peter of England - Private Banking, Current Events

SEDM - Federal Bureaucracy, Private Living, Forms

Boris - Private Living

Jordan Maxwell - History, Birth Certificates

Robert David Steele - Natural Law

Field McConnell - Military, Administrative History

Neil Warren - Lawful Banking (England)

Richard Cornforth -- Statutory Law, Legal History

John Trowbridge - History, Statutory Law, Constitution

Mary Croft - Government, History, Attitude Adjustment

Brent Winters - History of Law, Constitutions, Common Law

Freedom School - IRS, History, Statutory Law

Isaac Witham - Early American History, Treaties

Michael Kearns - Early American History, Treaties

SPLSPro -- British Equity Law

Emily Windsor - Cragg - British History, British Law, Monarchy.

Republic of Texas - IRS and Tax Court, Land Patents

No doubt I am forgetting very worthy groups and people at this moment and will think of them with a big "ouch!" as they (or their fans) call me to task. Please don't think that just because someone's name doesn't appear on The List that it is any strike against them per se. This is just an Off-the-Top-of-My-Head list of some of the many people and organizations who are contemporaries providing insights via websites, videos, teleconferences, or publications and who have consistently provided solid information in these subject areas.

Anna von Reitz
11 hrs ·

My Nightstand

My Nightstand is large, indeed, capacious for a nightstand. It has room to hold a lamp, a clock radio/CD player, water decanter, and lots of books.

There is room for the Bible to have its own space with no other books below or on top of it, and room for a stack of ever-changing books of other kinds.

I try to keep a variety of books in that Big Stack. There are currently books about mathematics and medicine, law and journalism, Christian commentary, botany, mineralogy, early American History, and British History on my nightstand. They vary in difficulty from weighty and dense, jargon-filled tomes to light popular reading that keeps me connected.

Thank God I learned to read and to write and --miracle of miracles, considering my eye-hand coordination-- also learned to type.

There is always some new wonder or insight to discuss and share, some reason to be lost in contemplation. The whole glory of creation opens up, even in a jail cell, even in the loneliest and most remote place, if you have the companionship of a book. Late at night you will find me reading my share of the Bible and then trying to find a few extra minutes to address the Big Stack.

Life being life and things being what they are, some books stay in the Big Stack for months as I gradually macerate them a few pages at a time. Other books are there and gone like a spark from a bonfire. I devour "light reading" like a box of bon-bons--- and mostly with the same kind of pleasure.

A friend recently sent me a copy of Howard Storm's book, My Descent into Death. I recommend it. As I was hurtling through it I had to stop several times as the words on the page so perfectly and succinctly described my own experience of "Near Death" and the awareness I was given.

Coming so very near to death changes your life in ways you don't even begin to imagine at the time it happens. It opens doors and insights that were hidden before. It expands your capacity to feel and to love and to be connected.

Isn't it strange that death can be a portal to new life and purpose? And yet, it is. It was for Howard Storm. It was for me, too. And like him, I feel compelled to say something, to raise my hand and share the experience.
Just on the other side of the veil separating the living from the dead, the Truth is fully known. There's never any reason to lie or keep secrets, because every tiny detail, every motivation, every circumstance is fully known. And not just about your life, about every life. It's all recorded on eternal Memorex.

If I can share nothing else and convey nothing else to people about that blessed intimacy with God and the Angels that we are all invited to share, regardless of our sins and regardless of our religions, let it be that there are no secrets. There are no lies.

So you have no reason to be anything but upright in your lives. You are free to be absolutely honest about all things, at all times, and it makes no sense to live your life any other way.

And if I am gifted to share any other insight with all of you, let it be that every effort you make to be good and to love the Earth and to love other people increases the joy of all creation. Love is never wasted.

Every time you choose good over evil, every time you make the thankless effort, every time that you sacrifice to help someone, every time you let your love extend outward -- it matters. So let those moments and gestures and efforts increase and let those sacrifices be made with faith and heart, to please Our Father in Heaven, to bless those struggling along with us, and to make our Choice for the future certain.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

uh huh. So an independent judiciary is composed of judges picked by the executive branch and approved by the legislative branch?

I don't think so.

You might want to refer to AmJur 2d for administrative law. It is described as the 4th branch of government. Hard to imagine a 4th branch of government when there are only 3 branches under the constitution.

So then look at Bill of Attainder. It is prohibited because it represents the legislative branch telling the judicial branch what the punishments are for various crimes. A bill of pains and punishments is a less lethal version of a bill of attainder. What is objectionable about these is they shortcut the separation of powers between branches.

Any structure that crosses branch lines is a bill of attainder. And that includes administrative agencies.

---

I don’t see any specific provision in the Constitution for the selection of the judges for the inferior courts, so the inferior Court Judges appointments must fall in the category “whose Appointments are not herein provided for”.

It appears to me that a constitutional amendment would be necessary for any other method of [s]electing or appointing of the federal judges, in order to remove the power from the President with advice and consent of the Senate.

Some choices could be either the Judicial branch appointing their own (not a good thing), popular vote or some special commission convened to appoint judges.

Article II §2 Clause 2:
He shall have Power, [by] and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, and other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provide for, and which shall be established by Law;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

It appears to me that a constitutional amendment would be necessary for any other method of [s]electing or appointing of the federal judges, in order to remove the power from the President with advice and consent of the Senate.

---

In June of 1948 Harry S. Truman exhibited a desire to leave the constitutional provisions relating to signing legislation into law only while congress was in session. Seems to me if the president gets to select which limits he chooses to follow and which he chooses to deviate from then there is no portion of his oath that actually means anything. In other words, Harry chose to deviate from his oath. Nobody chose to deviate for him. Every occupant of the oval office has built upon Harry's deviation to the extent that one even expressed "the constitution is nothing but a G-D piece of paper".