Printable View
there are only two choices: blue vs red types of energies. And I am sure that DARPA is already very advanced in the blue type one. Oil is a "red energy" for cavemen, justifying war.
But I am not expecting from you to endorse the fibonacci model for engines. Too much magic here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
Interesting why you have this propensity to choose positions for your perceived enemies that are contrary to your own. Maybe it makes your discussion more interesting? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
You certainly carry around a huge chip on your shoulder, and you are probably one of the most unbalanced people I know of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
con•trar•i•an (kənˈtrɛər i ən)
n.
1. a person who takes an opposing view, esp. one who rejects the majority opinion, as in economic matters.
adj.
2. disagreeing with or proceeding against current opinion or established practice.
I wonder what it is called when a person is contrarian to him-/her-self?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
Hypocrisy? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
that is your perception... I didnt see anything wise in the line you responded.
But there is progress because now you are starting to use the vocabulary I hold dear. I am influencing your thoughts in a good way it seems
the day you start positing out of the box materials, instead of always going mainstream, and I will give you undivided attention. waiting
Unbalanced... talk of yourself , anything that doesnt fit the rational 3D scientific method is associated with magic. LOL.
you are so mainstream, narrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
instead, debate the EU, which you claim to be unworkable.
when are you going to acknowledge that newton and einstein theories are about to fall off a cliff.
so be my guess
the theories I am defending have been out there for millennia and I feel bad you never gave them any attention.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
I never claimed it unworkable. I asked to explain the source of neutrinos if the sun is not nuclear. But like anything I've ever asked you, you skirt around and never provide an answer. Why would this be any different?Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
I also want DATA to explain the EU theory. No conjecture. EVIDENCE!! Even Metaphysics can be explained in math, it's how Quantum physics have shown there is a master vibration throughout the universe. I take absolutely nothing anyone says at face value, I want proof. Without proof or evidence all you have is a theory you cannot explain or replicate.
ares, I dont think you are that interested in the EU, if you were your postings would demonstrate that you did watched much of the EU materials available online. Instead you want an evidence presented to you.
The EU may or may not be fully complete at this stage (but all what I heard made sense to me so far) and this is something that should allow you to leave the intellectual door open instead of bashing.
I dont have any particular material in mind right now to answer your question BUT know that anybody following the laws of electricity will always be proven right at some point down the road. Because electricity is the blood of the Universe.
Quantum physics has its detractors too, I think neuro is one of them. But quantum physics depends on computers, while living geometry does not. Something to chew on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
There you go again making contrary positions for me again, for you to discuss against. For along time I actually thought you were intentionally lying about me, when you made up these positions I actually don't hold. But I start to think you are not doing this with the knowledge that they are lies. You probably believe you know me, when you are conversing with the demon inside you.Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
Ares the correct term would be Schizophrenia.