Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tumbleweed
John 12:40 He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.
:)
Look in the mirror and you will find him.
The Jews book requires a loss of 6 million in a holocaust and WWI was the setup for those conditions. The Jews openly screwed the German's at Versailles, putting in place the reason for the German's to hate them.
Then they hired Hitler to complete the job and 10 million German's were offered instead while the Jews were escorted safely to invade America and Palestine.
The totally controlled Jewish press created the story (tall tale) about Jewish suffering. From controversy of Zion we learn Hitler locked up well over 90 percent of his fellow Germans and the amount of Jews locked up was in proportion to their amount in the population 2 -3 percent. This figure was never reported, as all we heard about was Hitler was only locking up all Jews, nothing about the German's.
And a lot of deceived people still believe this Jewish story.
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
We've both got our minds made up on this Bigjon and I don't think anything is going to change that. I post what has the ring of truth to me and others can read it and make up their own minds.
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Then (((they))) hired Hitler to complete the job...we learn Hitler locked up well over 90 percent his fellow Germans...
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos...7955?s=612x612
Bigjon is right about our Global Earth and obviously wrong about Hitler. Tumbleweed is extremely knowledgeable about the history of Germany and Hitler. More so than anyone else here.
:rolleyes:
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jewboo
Well the facts tell a different story.
I guess this is your vote as there are no facts presented to be commented on.
Just an appeal to authority, without any corresponding evidence.
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Well the facts tell a different story.
I guess this is your vote as there are no facts presented to be commented on.
Just an appeal to authority, without any corresponding evidence.
https://media1.tenor.com/images/9f1d...itemid=4318766
:rolleyes:
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jewboo
It's in this book, book.
https://controversyofzion.info/
You have the option of believing the Jewish press or believing an English journalist.
Thread
From chap 36:
At that period I, typical of Englishmen of my generation, had never thought of Jews as different from myself, nor could I have said what might make a Jew, in his opinion, different from me. If I later became aware of any differentiation, or of the desire of a powerful group to assert one, this was not the result of Hitler's deeds but of the new impediment to impartial reporting which I then began to observe. When the general persecution began I reported it as I saw it. If I learned of a concentration camp containing a thousand captives I reported this; if I learned that the thousand included thirty or fifty Jews I reported that. I saw the first terror, spoke with many of the victims, examined their injuries, and was warned that I incurred Gestapo hostility thereby. The victims were in the great majority, certainly much over ninety percent, Germans, and a few were Jews. This reflected the population-ratio, in Germany and later in the countries overrun by Hitler. But the manner of reporting in the world's press in time blocked-out the great suffering mass, leaving only the case of the Jews.
I illustrate this by episodes and passages from my own experience and reporting. Rabbi Stephen Wise, writing in 1949, gave the following version of events personally reported by me in 1933, and undoubtedly purveyed the same version in the presidential circle of which he was a familiar during those years: “The measures against the Jews continued to outstrip in systematic cruelty and planned destruction the terror against other groups. On January 29, 1933 Hitler was summoned to be chancellor … at once the reign of terror began with beatings and imprisonment of Jews … We planned a protest march in New York on May 10, the day of the ordered burning of Jewish books in Germany … the brunt of the attack was borne by Jews … concentration camps were established and filled with Jews.”
All these statements are false. The measures against the Jews did not outstrip the terror against other groups; the Jews were involved in a much larger number of others. The reign of terror did not begin on January 29, 1933, but in the night of the Reichstag fire, February 27. No “burning of Jewish books” was ordered; I attended and reported that bonfire and have looked up my report published in The Times, to verify my recollection. A mass of “Marxist” books was burned, including the works of many German, English and other non-Jewish writers (my books, had they then been published, would undoubtedly have been among them); the bonfire included some Jewish books. The “brunt” of the terror was not borne by Jews, nor were the concentration camps “filled with Jews.” The number of Jewish victims was in proportion to their ratio of the population.
Nevertheless this false picture, by iteration, came to dominate the public mind during the Second War. At the time of my resignation, which was provoked solely by the “policy of appeasement” and the imminent advent of “the unnecessary war,” this other hindrance to faithful reporting was but a secondary, minor annoyance. Later I discerned that the motive behind it was of major importance in shaping the course and outcome of the Second War.” When I came to study the story of Mr. Robert Wilton I perceived that there was also a strong resemblance between my experience and his. He sought to explain the nature of an event in Russia and thus was inevitably led into “the Jewish question.” Twenty years later I observed that it was in fact impossible to draw public attention to the misreporting of the nature of the persecution of Germany and to explain that the Jews formed only a small fraction of the victims.
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
It's in this book, book.
https://controversyofzion.info/
You have the option of believing the Jewish press or believing an English journalist.
Thread
From chap 36:
At that period I, typical of Englishmen of my generation, had never thought of Jews as different from myself, nor could I have said what might make a Jew, in his opinion, different from me. If I later became aware of any differentiation, or of the desire of a powerful group to assert one, this was not the result of Hitler's deeds but of the new impediment to impartial reporting which I then began to observe. When the general persecution began I reported it as I saw it. If I learned of a concentration camp containing a thousand captives I reported this; if I learned that the thousand included thirty or fifty Jews I reported that. I saw the first terror, spoke with many of the victims, examined their injuries, and was warned that I incurred Gestapo hostility thereby. The victims were in the great majority, certainly much over ninety percent, Germans, and a few were Jews. This reflected the population-ratio, in Germany and later in the countries overrun by Hitler. But the manner of reporting in the world's press in time blocked-out the great suffering mass, leaving only the case of the Jews.
I illustrate this by episodes and passages from my own experience and reporting. Rabbi Stephen Wise, writing in 1949, gave the following version of events personally reported by me in 1933, and undoubtedly purveyed the same version in the presidential circle of which he was a familiar during those years: “The measures against the Jews continued to outstrip in systematic cruelty and planned destruction the terror against other groups. On January 29, 1933 Hitler was summoned to be chancellor … at once the reign of terror began with beatings and imprisonment of Jews … We planned a protest march in New York on May 10, the day of the ordered burning of Jewish books in Germany … the brunt of the attack was borne by Jews … concentration camps were established and filled with Jews.”
All these statements are false. The measures against the Jews did not outstrip the terror against other groups; the Jews were involved in a much larger number of others. The reign of terror did not begin on January 29, 1933, but in the night of the Reichstag fire, February 27. No “burning of Jewish books” was ordered; I attended and reported that bonfire and have looked up my report published in The Times, to verify my recollection. A mass of “Marxist” books was burned, including the works of many German, English and other non-Jewish writers (my books, had they then been published, would undoubtedly have been among them); the bonfire included some Jewish books. The “brunt” of the terror was not borne by Jews, nor were the concentration camps “filled with Jews.” The number of Jewish victims was in proportion to their ratio of the population.
Nevertheless this false picture, by iteration, came to dominate the public mind during the Second War. At the time of my resignation, which was provoked solely by the “policy of appeasement” and the imminent advent of “the unnecessary war,” this other hindrance to faithful reporting was but a secondary, minor annoyance. Later I discerned that the motive behind it was of major importance in shaping the course and outcome of the Second War.” When I came to study the story of Mr. Robert Wilton I perceived that there was also a strong resemblance between my experience and his. He sought to explain the nature of an event in Russia and thus was inevitably led into “the Jewish question.” Twenty years later I observed that it was in fact impossible to draw public attention to the misreporting of the nature of the persecution of Germany and to explain that the Jews formed only a small fraction of the victims.
Reed later pulled his head out of his ass. From this:
Quote:
His predictions of major political events were for many people surprisingly accurate at a time, when the “responsible politicians” of the West were acting in direct opposition to his advice and interpretations, and the unifying principle of the book is one long warning against the threat from Hitler-Germany.
To this:
Quote:
By this time he no longer holds any doubt, that there is most certainly a serious Jewish problem. From then on he would get to study the problem thoroughly through the following ten years.
His well-intentioned advice, that the Jewish problem could only be solved by the Jews getting their own nation (but not by killing arabs), was abandoned by him again, when his studies of talmudic zionism, and the eventual establishment of Israel, demonstrated to him, that the Jewish question implied much more than just that, and was now so much bigger.
Also, he discovered, it had in reality been laid down in an ancient plan for world-conquest.
Linky
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jewboo
Reed later pulled his head out of his ass. From this:
To this:
Linky
This does not say anything about the fact that Hitler locked up well over 90 percent German's.
Controversy was his last book which was not published until he died.
Controversy is the story of the Jews age old plan for world domination.
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
It's in this book, book.
https://controversyofzion.info/
You have the option of believing the Jewish press or believing an English journalist.
Thread
From chap 36:
At that period I, typical of Englishmen of my generation, had never thought of Jews as different from myself, nor could I have said what might make a Jew, in his opinion, different from me. If I later became aware of any differentiation, or of the desire of a powerful group to assert one, this was not the result of Hitler's deeds but of the new impediment to impartial reporting which I then began to observe. When the general persecution began I reported it as I saw it. If I learned of a concentration camp containing a thousand captives I reported this; if I learned that the thousand included thirty or fifty Jews I reported that. I saw the first terror, spoke with many of the victims, examined their injuries, and was warned that I incurred Gestapo hostility thereby. The victims were in the great majority, certainly much over ninety percent, Germans, and a few were Jews. This reflected the population-ratio, in Germany and later in the countries overrun by Hitler. But the manner of reporting in the world's press in time blocked-out the great suffering mass, leaving only the case of the Jews.
I illustrate this by episodes and passages from my own experience and reporting. Rabbi Stephen Wise, writing in 1949, gave the following version of events personally reported by me in 1933, and undoubtedly purveyed the same version in the presidential circle of which he was a familiar during those years: “The measures against the Jews continued to outstrip in systematic cruelty and planned destruction the terror against other groups. On January 29, 1933 Hitler was summoned to be chancellor … at once the reign of terror began with beatings and imprisonment of Jews … We planned a protest march in New York on May 10, the day of the ordered burning of Jewish books in Germany … the brunt of the attack was borne by Jews … concentration camps were established and filled with Jews.”
All these statements are false. The measures against the Jews did not outstrip the terror against other groups; the Jews were involved in a much larger number of others. The reign of terror did not begin on January 29, 1933, but in the night of the Reichstag fire, February 27. No “burning of Jewish books” was ordered; I attended and reported that bonfire and have looked up my report published in The Times, to verify my recollection. A mass of “Marxist” books was burned, including the works of many German, English and other non-Jewish writers (my books, had they then been published, would undoubtedly have been among them); the bonfire included some Jewish books. The “brunt” of the terror was not borne by Jews, nor were the concentration camps “filled with Jews.” The number of Jewish victims was in proportion to their ratio of the population.
Nevertheless this false picture, by iteration, came to dominate the public mind during the Second War. At the time of my resignation, which was provoked solely by the “policy of appeasement” and the imminent advent of “the unnecessary war,” this other hindrance to faithful reporting was but a secondary, minor annoyance. Later I discerned that the motive behind it was of major importance in shaping the course and outcome of the Second War.” When I came to study the story of Mr. Robert Wilton I perceived that there was also a strong resemblance between my experience and his. He sought to explain the nature of an event in Russia and thus was inevitably led into “the Jewish question.” Twenty years later I observed that it was in fact impossible to draw public attention to the misreporting of the nature of the persecution of Germany and to explain that the Jews formed only a small fraction of the victims.
For all we know, Hitler who was so vilified by the Jews, may have been their savior. The German people were rightly pissed-off and the Jews were directly responsible, not only for their current troubles at the time, but all they had to do was look next door to the Soviet Union to see what was in store for them at the tender mercies of the Jewish Revolutionaries. I would urge anyone who has not read Controversy of Zion, to do so, as Bigjon asks. It is not an easy read and it may be even harder for one who has cherished delusions or truths, whatever they may be. All we have at this point is that which rings true to us as individuals, as Tumbleweed pointed out. There are so many signs pointing to an (almost) flawlessly executed false flag that was the entire conflict. Read that book and tell me what does not ring true to you. Our parents on both sides of the conflict were bamboozled by the professional bamboozlers.
One thing that Reed points out in the book is that the Shepardic Jews were to a great degree, woven and integrated into German society. They (the Shepardim) were appalled by the rude and crazy tendencies of the "OstJuden" as they called them, meaning Eastern Jews. Fully 60% of the German Jews were mixed through marriage or other ways into the German people. They loved Germany and they sure as hell didn't want to leave for some shithole in the desert. The very same month Hitler took power, Jewish immigration to the United States was halted completely. Hmmm...….
The whole fucking war was a sci-op and charade; A false flag of immense proportion.
Re: Jews, the children of Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
This does not say anything about the fact that Hitler locked up well over 90 percent German's. Controversy was his last book which was not published until he died. Controversy is the story of the Jews age old plan for world domination.
Download the entire book in .pdf format here: The Controversy of Zion
Your only source for this amazing "fact" is Reed's book? It was well known that degenerates and faggots and genetic retards were also locked up. We should be doing that today!
:rolleyes:
