-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
40 mins ·
Three Levels of Pecking Order
There are three levels of pecking order in the world we live in:
1. Living people, who are unincorporated and sovereign beings.
2. Lawful Persons, that are corporate, but not incorporated.
3. Legal Persons, that incorporated entities.
How does this work? Living people create Lawful Persons and Lawful Persons create Legal Persons.
Your living parents thought up a name and gave it to you. First your parents created you, and then, they created your Lawful Person.
They might also create a small unincorporated business and name it -- thereby creating another Lawful Person.
So this is the relationship between living people and Lawful Persons.
Lawful Persons can be "converted" into Legal Persons by changing the jurisdiction in which these Persons are operating.
When a Lawful Person is shanghaied off the land and into the jurisdiction of the sea without their knowledge or consent, as we Americans were, this is called an "unlawful conversion".
Via unlawful and non-consensual conversion all our Lawful Persons were "presumed" to be "Legal Persons" beginning in 1933.
Since the name appears the same either way, regardless of the capacity in which we are acting, it is impossible to look at a piece of paper, read a name like "Shaun Patrick Murray" and tell whether a man is operating as a "Lawful Person" or in a "Legal Person" capacity.
When our shanghaied Legal Person wakes up and declares and records their return to the land and soil jurisdiction they are heir to, this results in a "lawful conversion" back to Lawful Person status.
This is what we are doing when we purposefully extract our Proper Names and return them to the land and soil of our home States and reclaim our birthright political status as American State Nationals or American State Citizens. We are "on the record" lawfully converting the presumed "Legal Person" back into a "Lawful Person".
Please really notice this and grasp the fact that on paper, "Shaun Patrick Murray" a Lawful Person standing on the land and soil of California, looks exactly the same as "Shaun Patrick Murray" a Legal Person on a boat a hundred miles out at sea.
In the first case, Shaun Patrick is living under the Public Law of California as a Private Person. In the second case, Shaun Patrick is living under the International Law of the Sea and is a Ward (a Public Person) of the State of California.
See the difference in law and status that was created by the filthy, rotten, dirty Roosevelt Administration? It unlawfully converted the identity and political status and capacity of the innocent American People to that of homeless "Wards" of the British Territorial States of States.
It was the crime of the century.
It also unlawfully converted them from being heirs of this country and inheritors of the constitutional guarantees to being British subjects of the Queen and also subjected the victims of this monstrous betray to maritime and admiralty law.
Okay, so that's the Sting Operation and "Switcheroo" the British Territorial United States Government pulled on us in 1933.... the conversion by fiat of legal presumption of our entire population, their unlawful conversion of our Lawful Persons into Legal Persons, and also their non-consensual press-ganging and transport of trusting Americans into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea as "wards" and "Public Persons" of their States of States.
But what about Legal Persons that exist by consent?
Some people like a life at sea and they are, of course, able to choose that option. Many do, when they sign up to serve in the U.S. Military. However, when they retire, they are eligible to return home to the land and soil of their home States, like anyone else who has been working overseas for a foreign corporation.
There are also Legal Persons of other kinds. One may take a step further into the airy-fairy world of international commerce and form an incorporated PERSON. Such incorporated PERSONS can be formed by either Lawful Persons or Legal Persons, depending upon their permanent domicile.
Incorporated PERSONS have to be formed under a charter or convention that stipulates their nature, purpose and aims, structure, kind of business, officers, any limitations, and form of law and resolution they are standing under.
Typically, incorporated PERSONS are chartered by a government, that is, by other pre-existing Legal Persons
or LEGAL PERSONS.
In this country, this could be a Territorial State of State, a Municipal STATE OF STATE, or directly by their parent corporations which are, of course, already Legal Persons or LEGAL PERSONS themselves.
If a Lawful Person creates an incorporated PERSON via Patent or buys or accepts such a PERSON as a gift (what the Municipal United States does when it "confers" a Municipal PERSON/CITIZEN as a gift to every Territorial United States Citizen/Ward of the State) they are free to domicile that PERSON wherever they wish in the world, and that PERSON then "stands under" the law of the country where they are domiciled, regardless of where else they might be.
This is what we do as Lawful Persons when we seize upon the Assumed NAMES derived from our Proper Names and declare their permanent domicile on the land and soil of one of the States. The PERSONS associated with us because they are NAMED after us, are then no longer standing under the laws of Puerto Rico, but under the Public Law of -- for example -- Maine.
Lawful Person can operate in the capacity of LEGAL PERSONS/ MUNICIPAL CITIZENS but seldom have any reason to, unless they go to work for the Municipal United States Government as Federal Civil Service Employees. Like their brethren in the U.S. Military, they can return home to their States and resume life as Lawful Persons once they are severed from or retire from their Federal Municipal jobs.
So are you one of the "people" living on the soil jurisdiction of your Republican State or acting as one of the Lawful Persons called "People" populating the land Jurisdiction of your State of the Union, or are you acting as a Legal Person known as a "United States Citizen" or acting as a Legal PERSON known as a "Citizen of the United States" or....
As you can see, it's impossible for you to intelligently choose such a capacity or even know what form of law you are operating under, until someone explains all this.
Nobody does. So you are like an infant, defenseless, left adrift in a sea of deceit and breach of trust.
Most lawyers in this country don't even know all this.
They have been trained to process certain kinds of financial transactions and make it look good, or as the Rules of the Federal Courts put it, "provide an appearance of Justice".
Most of lawyers know nothing about actual Public Law.
Most of them don't even know that we have the option of acting as Lawful Persons, because their education has been so one-sided.
Most lawyers don't know that their Attorney Escrow Accounts are being used launder money and transfer money all over the world, either. They don't know that they have been set up to be the Fall Guys, along with the military Generals, for the bankers and politicians.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
CHAPTER XVI. OF PERSONS, AUTHORS, AND THINGS PERSONATED
A Person What
A PERSON, is he "whose words or actions are considered, either as his own, or as representing the words or actions of an other man, or of any other thing to whom they are attributed, whether Truly or by Fiction."
Anna's definition is distorted by attempting to read multiple statutes dealing with the topic. Hobbes on the other hand predates her by 400 years and I believe his definition is preferred.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ziero0
Anna's definition is distorted by attempting to read multiple statutes dealing with the topic. Hobbes on the other hand predates her by 400 years and I believe his definition is preferred.
I've never heard of the Hobbes law dictionary?
Maybe you could point out a law dictionary that backs up your claim.
The point is I can comprehend Anna's definition and have no idea how to apply Hobbes definition to the situation at hand..
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
I've never heard of the Hobbes law dictionary?
Maybe you could point out a law dictionary that backs up your claim.
The point is I can comprehend Anna's definition and have no idea how to apply Hobbes definition to the situation at hand..
I have been known to consult childrens books as sources of Law ... notably Uncle Remus. Dictionaries are for what they intend ... DICTION. How to speak or pronounce. The meaning of DICTIONary has become distorted over the years.
In any event Hobbes can be consulted here ... refer to ch XVI
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3207/3207-h/3207-h.htm
With Hobbes you don't get a singular person attached to a singular Man or Woman. In fact you create a person for each word you speak or every action you take or each agent you admit to your Stable. According to Hobbes God was personated thrice ... but I believe His personation to be unlimited.
The system favors some persons. The system punishes other persons. You might want to consider a person as a sticky-note that gets plastered on your jacket. None of them are YOU but if you happen to fall into the category AUTHOR then you get the candy or the stick.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Well in order to have order, you have to invent names for categories. The def you provide says one name covers everything; which to me sounds like dis-order.
I'll stick with Anna.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Well in order to have order....
Here is a law of nature for you:
The universe tends toward maximum disorder.
https://www.realclearscience.com/ima...ortex_edit.jpg
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
[QUOTE=ziero0;948837]Here is a law of nature for you:
The universe tends toward maximum disorder.
[\QUOTE]
If you look close enough there is order inside that disorder and you can name the elements and put them in a book called aerodynamic engineering.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
you can name the elements and put them in a book called aerodynamic engineering.
You don't suppose that is the same book acknowledged as an authority by the designers of the 737 MAX?
Here is an example of the universe at work on chaos:
The customs house in New Orleans was built in 1850 on swampground. They excavated a city block, filled it with cypress logs and built a 4 story granite structure on it that survives intact to this day. The building floats on a raft.
In 1970 a mile away Tulane University erected a 10 story library building on pilings. The architect forgot to include the weight of the books when sizing the pilings and so now there are steps down to the 1st floor.
Now you would think that 120 years of writing books and performing designs with computer would have made the world a better place.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
For All The Jural Assemblies 46 - No Pledges Ever
We all grew up being exposed to "The Pledge of Allegiance" as schoolchildren. We were indoctrinated from an early age to mindlessly recite something without knowing what it really meant.
Start with the fact that a "Pledge" is a Feudal Oath given by a Serf or Tenant to a sovereign, promising "allegiance" another word from the feudal relationship vocabulary, subjecting yourself to the sovereign and promising to support and protect the sovereign.
And what was standing in the "sovereign" position in "The Pledge of Allegiance"?
The flag of something calling itself "the United States of America" --- they just didn't bother to tell anyone which United States of America.
Most Americans have been kept from ever knowing that there are many different variations of both "United States" and "United States of America" and yes, it does matter which one you are talking about.
There is the unincorporated version of The United States which refers to the sovereign soil jurisdiction State Republics and their "Union" formed in 1776, and there is the unincorporated version of The United States of America, our Holding Company formed September 9, 1776, which refers to the sovereign International Land Jurisdiction of the unincorporated States of the Union.
These are the two entities that Americans naturally think of when someone says, "United States" or "United States of America", but in addition to these unincorporated entities that hold the land and soil jurisdictions of our country, there are other incorporated entities that are supposed to work for our States and People.
These include two other "kinds" of United States and United States of America that operate in the Municipal jurisdiction of the the Holy Roman Empire and the International Jurisdiction of the Sea, respectively.
These incorporated versions are "doing business names" of foreign corporations that are on our shores, purportedly to provide specified governmental services under the provisions of their respective Constitutions.
Their "United States" which is actually "the United States, Inc." is run by the members of the Territorial Congress acting as the government of the Washington, DC Municipality, which is an independent international city state like Vatican City and the Inner City of London known as Westminster and more recently, New York City and the United Nations have made bold to become ---without our permission, separate international governments standing on the land and soil of New York.
Time for the People of New York to wake up and put these Freebooters in their place, but that's another story.
Right now, just take in the fact that "United States" in this context means the Municipal Government being run by the members of Congress as a "plenary oligarchy" that is only supposed to operate and exist within the ten miles square of the District of Columbia. [Article I, Section 8, Clause 17]
Also take note that when this version of incorporated foreign "United States" is being referenced, the definite article associated with it is not capitalized and not part of the name. That is, our actual government's Proper Name is "The United States", while their strictly limited foreign Municipal government providing services "in our names" is "the" United States.
The same sort of confusion occurs with "the" United States of America, which refers to the British Territorial service providers under contract to our States. In the same way, the Proper Name of our unincorporated version is "The United States of America" and "The" is both capitalized and part of the name. Their foreign incorporated version --- again --- is "the" United States of America.
So when we look at their "Pledge of Allegiance" what do we see? Which "United States of America" is being referenced? Ours or the British version?
We already know that a "Pledge" is a Feudal Oath and we know our Founders weren't into Feudalism, so we should not be surprised to observe that the Queen's subjects are pledging themselves to "the" United States of America via their Pledge of Allegiance to the Queen and the British Territorial corporation doing business as "the" United States of America.
Read it and weep:
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America" ---- this is the war flag of the British Territorial Commercial Corporation doing business "in our name" --- the United States of America, Inc.
"and to the Republic for which it stands" ----- we got a passing mention and a presumed Dual Citizenship obligation thrown in.
"one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all" ---- and the problem with this is? (1) It isn't clear which "God" we are subjecting ourselves to; (2) they are just subcontractors and we owe them no more loyalty than they show us; (3) we, Americans, enjoy freedom, not "liberty" which is what British sailors get when they arrive in ports of call.
As you can see, pledging is a British thing. It has nothing to do with us, our American Government, or any natural obligation we have as Americans.
Americans don't do pledges because we are sovereigns in our own right, and pledging to a foreign sovereign obligates us to serve them instead of serving our own sovereignty.
So we never, ever, under any circumstance make "pledges" to anyone or anything, including the flag being flown "for" us by a British Territorial Corporation.
Think of the insanity of what is being employed against us? A living man subjects himself to an inanimate symbol like a flag? Can you think of a worse form of idolatry?
This innocent-sounding "pledge" disrespects all three major western religions. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all forbid the worship of idols.
Yet, here we have had generations of clueless American schoolchildren -- and adults, too--- pledging their lives and substance to an inanimate object, an idol, being used under contract by a British Territorial Commercial Corporation as a war flag.
Needless to say, this venal and undisclosed practice of "pledging" has to stop and it has to be known and repudiated by any and every thinking man and woman in this country.
No sentient Christian, Jew, or Muslim can ever take such a pledge, nor should they.
If you do knowingly ever take a "pledge" of any kind, be aware that whatever you are "pledging" is encumbered and that whatever you are "pledging to" becomes the ruler over you.
Do you want to be ruled over by a war flag being borrowed from our actual government by a British Territorial Commercial Company operating out of Puerto Rico under Spanish Law and calling itself "the United States of America"?
Didn't think so, but had to ask, because that is what happens when you recite "The Pledge of Allegiance".
Much of what we have been told in Public Schools across America and also taught to accept and to do, is wrong, or a half truth, or a sin by omission leading us to make wrong assumptions to our detriment.
This is just one particularly evil example of betrayal of our trust.
As American State Jural Assembly members we never take pledges. We operate in our capacity as Lawful Persons and the only sovereign State we serve is our own.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
We operate in our capacity as Lawful Persons and the only sovereign State we serve is our own.
See now here is Anna gets into trouble with her definition of 'person'. The problem is grammar related. 'Lawful' is an adjective. All adjectives act to reduce the population of the noun being discussed. She is using 'Person' capitalized as a noun. Actually according to Hobbes 'person' is a verb. Conversion of a verb to a noun is an act of creation. In my opinion this conversion is involved in the criminal act of slaughtering a language.
The conversion of verbs to nouns is done by a process called 'nominalization'. An example is 'the holocaust'. Holocaust has always been used in the English language to refer to a horrible event. Such an event has been discussed concerning the situation in Europe during WWII. This event was not nominalized and called by the name 'the holocaust' until 1957. Now the verb sense of holocaust is still available but the singular sense as a noun will be forever linked to WWII.
Person is a verb .... an action, a word or representation. Refer to a Person and it becomes a noun. In prison you will only find Nouns. No verbs are permitted to pass the entrance gate to the prison.
And just to be entirely accurate, 'Persons' might refer to multiple verbs or a committee (such as a jural society) of individual 'Person'.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
It's Simple, Mr. Trump.
Return our National Credit to us, which is your National Debt.
That will cancel that portion of the Debt, set you free of it, and let us all get on with our lives.
Because we never received the equitable payment we were owed it became a debt for the US and a credit for the actual States and People.
Via discredited unconscionable contracts and false claims the United States has contrived to deny the American States and People the credit and other assets we are owed.
The United States, Inc. and the United States of America, Inc, have both lied through their teeth to prevent us from accessing and claiming what we are simply owed as the actual landlords of this country.
The fraud and the deceits are discovered. There is no way for Washington or London or Rome to hide it anymore.
So move our National Credit off the books of the DOD and give it back to The United States of America--- the unincorporated version, because We and our States are Parties to the Constitution and we earned it all.
Tell the Queen and Pope Francis that we are back home, alive and well, and not pleased by this ongoing stalemate and avoidance of the facts.
We are also displeased by the scandalous abuse of our banking system, most especially the abuse documented at HSBC by John Cruz and the abuse of Attorney Escrow Accounts and especially the abuse of our identities and personal data by these banks to create phony debt, phony tax claims, and to launder money.
These abuses must stop and these banks and securities corporations must be brought to bay, even if it means a military take-over and nationalization of the banks and securities industries under the auspices of our lawful restored American Government.
Please note that our States are competent to enforce the Constitutions and to act independently in trade or commerce with or without appointing new Federal-level States of States.
That is, the absence of Federal entities exercising delegated powers in no way hinders the delegators of those powers from exercising those same powers in our own behalf.
It's time we all had a frank and honest conversation about these issues.
May we suggest that Lancaster County in Pennsylvania is neutral ground, centrally located, and lovely this time of year?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
41 mins ·
Why Are You Here, Reading This?
Many of you are here, because you are in trouble. Or you are afraid that you will be in trouble in the future. You see the coercive power of what we call "the government" and you feel the chill when someone says, "FBI" or "IRS".
You can't even drive home from the grocery store without feeling oppressed and afraid of your own employees.
You are here because you know something is wrong, just like the title of my book: "You Know Something Is Wrong When..... An American Affidavit of Probable Cause".
You know or have cause to know that whatever you build, whatever you create, can be stolen from you by soul-less corporations and mindless bureaucrats. Even your children can be taken away by these same thugs in nice suits. And that is why you are here---- to learn how things got this bad and what you can do to protect yourself.
But if you stop there, if you are content with just that much, then you are okay, but "the" problem remains, and it gets worse year by year. Nothing has really changed.
How about your children? None of us last forever. So you have to teach them. They have to learn what you learn, so they can protect themselves, too. Lord knows, the government isn't going to protect them. The government thinks its job is to protect itself at our expense.
The government has to learn otherwise.
We are just a tiny part of the world's population. It's nice that we are making progress and claiming back our lawful estate, but billions of people are still clueless, still enslaved---- and as long as they are, is anyone safe?
Really? For how long?
You see now why you are being empowered and called to lead?
To make the world safe and sane again, to turn what is upside down right side up. That's why you are here.
That's why you are all leaders.
Now, it might not have occurred to you when you started that you were called to do anything more than save yourself from a traffic ticket, and maybe you might not have come, if someone told you --- hey, you! You are going to save this country, and right after that, you are going to save the world!
But as amazing as that is, that's why you are here.
That's what you are being called to do: save this beautiful country. Save your countrymen. And then, reach out and save the world.
You can do this. How do I know you can do this? Because you are here.
What you learn, you are going to share. What we do together, you are going to do alone and with other people, until everyone knows what you know.
If you never thought of yourself as a leader, start thinking of yourself as a leader now.
Because you are one, a leader, and the change we all need starts here and now, with you. It starts at your dinner table, your church, and your health club. It starts with your spouse, your children, your best friend, and the guys at work.
They may not want to hear the bad news, but they will want to hear the good news. And the good news is that the Americans are back, standing on the land and soil, and not accepting any suppositions otherwise.
That's good news. It means that the surreptitious theft of our own identities and the theft of our country and our resources is at an end.
How do I know that this vicious con game is at an end?
Because you are here, and once you know the truth, you can't "un-know" it.
You are now in possession of your heritage and you are beginning to learn who you are and how powerful you are.
You've been told that you are stupid.
You've been told that you are a "US Citizen".
You've been told that you are in hopeless debt.
You've been told that you have to obey your own employees.
You've been told that you are a tenant on your own land.
You've been told that you have to take I.O.U.s in exchange for your labor.
You've been told that you have to take I.O.U.s in exchange for your goods.
You've been told that your allegiance is pledged to a borrowed flag.
You've been told that you have to give up over half your earnings to taxes.
You've been told that the perpetrators of all this are bankrupt.
You've been told that that THING is DC is "your" government.
And none of these things are true.
Day by day from now on, you are going to rise up and restore the American Government you are owed. And so will I do the same. And so will those we teach and inspire to know what freedom is and how our government and the rest of the world is supposed to operate.
Being misinformed, being purposefully misrepresented and defrauded, is not a matter of stupidity or politics. It's a matter of premeditated crime.
The reason you will push yourself outside your Comfort Zone and begin talking to people about these things ---- even those people who don't want to hear --- is because you want this to be a good, safe, and decent country again, for your own sake, for the sake of our children, and for the good of the whole world.
That's why you, even the least of you, are going to be leaders.
That's why you are here, reading this.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 1:47 PM ·
March 6, 1933
On March 6, 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was addressing the Conference of Governors. These "Governors" were not our American Governors. They were elected corporate Franchise Managers of British Territorial organizations operating on our shores as "States of States" like "the State of Vermont".
These British Territorial citizenship organizations had secretively replaced our own American States of States in 1868, using a Similar Names Deceit to do so.
They crept in like Cuckoo Birds and replaced our American State of State doing business as, for example, "The State of Vermont" ---with their British Territorial version doing business as "the State of Vermont" ----and the innocent trusting American People were not told that truth about this at any time.
So, it's 1933, and the same monsters that pulled this fraud on the Americans in 1868 are getting ready to pull another.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt is bringing big news to the Franchise Managers calling themselves "Governors". In his own words, "The United States of America [Incorporated] is bankrupt!"
And what do these fake foreign Governors do?
They "pledge" the "good faith and credit" of their "states and the citizenry thereof" --- by which they could only mean their own British Territorial States of States [which are Confederate "States"] and their own British Territorial "United States Citizens".
We've already seen in my Article --- "For All the Jural Assemblies 46 -- No Pledges Ever" --- that pledging is a feudal act of serfs and tenants promising to support their sovereign. It's a peculiarly British thing.
It had nothing to do with us then and it has nothing to do with us now, except that people all over the world assumed that it did. In this way, the schemers set up a false legal presumption and helped themselves to our assets as collateral backing their debts.
This is called "hypothecation of debt" and it is a venal, foreign, patently immoral and unlawful practice.
Being unaware of the First Fraud, Americans were totally unaware of and unprepared for the Second Fraud from our British and Holy Roman Empire Employees.
As a result of what the filthy Brits did in 1868 acting in Gross Breach of Trust, and what they did in 1933, also acting in Gross Breach of Trust, generations of Americans were falsely "presumed" to be United States Citizens---and taxed and abused by the Queen accordingly.
As a further result, their "Persons" and the assets attached to their "Persons" were unlawfully converted from being recognized as Lawful Persons standing on the land and soil of this country to being "presumed to be" Legal Persons operating under the auspices of the British Monarch.
Nobody told us a thing. They all slapped each other on the back and thought that their treason, their breach of trust, their nasty criminal venture, would never be discovered.
The Americans were fast asleep, lulled by deceits and misrepresentations and endless repetitions of the Big Lie that they were free and living in the land of the free, while in fact, their identities were being stolen and their assets were being purloined by foreign interests and they were being robbed blind by their own employees.
So what do you say, Queen Elizabeth II?
You can start with a public apology and admission of guilt. We have the proof of what went on and who benefited from it, down to a gnat's eyelash. All of it. All the pay-offs, all the banks involved.
What do you say, Pope Francis?
You can start with a public apology, too. In some respects, your employees and affiliates were even worse.
These shameful con games and crimes were initiated and carried out by your employees and actual franchises on our shores, all under color of
law, all in Gross Breach of Trust and also, breach of commercial contract.
This has been our thanks for supporting Britain in two World Wars, and our thanks for rebuilding Europe. This has been our thanks for giving the Roman Catholic Church tax-free status on our shores.
You both knew what was going on, because you were profiting by it.
We do not intend to keep on talking for another twenty years.
All that correspondence is safely recorded and stowed away and all of it has been scanned into computer records and the thumb drives have been sent out worldwide, ready for distribution.
The full and ugly details of this malfeasance, maliciousness, and criminality will be known all over the world if you don't make haste to make lasting peace with your brothers and bring relief and redress to the people of this country.
Begin by cleaning out the Congress.
Begin by paying your debts.
Begin by making correction and reforming the "US District" and "State of State" courts.
Begin by putting an end to the media circus and propaganda.
We are dealing with the facts, and so must you: Fictio cedit veritati; fictio juris non est, ubi veritas.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 4:04 PM ·
Faces of the Cross
All over the world, the cross is recognized as "the" symbol of Christianity, yet, as we all have cause to know now, Jesus was executed on a Roman torture stake, not a cross at all.
Throughout the Middle East and North Africa, Turkey, and Greece, the Romans used torture stakes, simple posts set in the ground, without cross arms. They didn't waste good wood on criminals---especially not out in the backwater and arid territories like Judea.
So we may be sure that Jesus had his arms stretched out above his head on a single post without a crossbar---- a torture stake, not a cross at all.
Astonishingly, the symbol of Christianity is a lie.
Among all the other odd truths I have had to share with you, there's one to think about. Why have we been taught to venerate a lie? Was it just a mistake made by later generations, and if so, why hasn't it been corrected?
The actual symbol of "a" cross pre-dates Jesus by many, many centuries. It goes back to what is called "the World Cross" --- an equal-armed cross still used by the Knights of Malta, which symbolizes the intersection of the world of spirit and the world of flesh.
Symbolically, we all live at the intersection, in a moment called "now" --- which is a time without a time, in a space without a space, where Alpha and Omega meet and everything that was meets everything that is and everything that will be.
The Cross is the sign of God in us, but not an accurate sign of what Jesus suffered.
As a Lutheran I grew up with a "plain cross" --- a simple, unequal armed cross that is empty. There is no trace of the body of Jesus hanging upon it. Not even the nails are left. Just a plain empty cross.
As a child, I liked that, because it proclaimed to me --- he is risen. He is not here. He is not hanging on this horrible, gruesome contraption like a piece of meat. I still like that. That is, to me, the true take-home message.
The Catholic Crucifix by comparison is a totally different thing that intersects reality at a different moment. Here we find Jesus still suffering, or still dead, depending on how you look at it and how the artist portrays it.
One day I was at a local Catholic Church for some meeting or other for Foster Parents Plan and Habitat for Humanity and some of the other charities including Catholic Social Services. The leaders of these groups had all had a big meeting and it was late in the afternoon as we broke up.
Everyone else hurried homeward. I wandered through the Nave of the church, past the baptismal font, and paused, looking up at the giant life-sized crucifix and the figure of Jesus attached to it. His face was slack, no longer in agony, but dead. Yes, definitely dead.
The priest of the parish walked up almost silently behind me, his feet making no sound on the deeply carpeted aisle. I was startled when he spoke.
"What do you see?" he inquired.
"Jesus, dead on the cross, waiting for Joseph to come take him down."
"What do you think it means?" he asked.
"I think it is a reminder of what our sins have cost and what we owe."
"What else?"
"I think the Devil is laughing. I think it is a reminder that, in some sense, he won. At least, temporarily. "
"There," the priest admitted, "you have it all."
I thought --- not quite.
There is the Rest of the Story, the plain and empty cross.
Or, as it turns out, the empty torture stake, standing like any other innocent post in the world, his blood being washed away by the wind and the rain, bleached by the sun.
There is the veil between life and death being torn asunder, just like the edges of the Red Sea being pulled apart.
I left the pensive priest standing there, still looking up at the scene of death and defeat. I had someone to meet. I went home and lit a candle, poured myself a glass of red wine, and ate my crust of bread and soup for dinner that night.
And he was there with me, the Lord of the Heavens, being remembered as he asked for us to remember him, whenever we drink wine, whenever we break bread.
Because I know Jesus, I can tell you that he didn't mean to make Communion into a franchise operation. He meant it to be exactly what he said --- a remembrance of him, an in-dwelling of his spirit and his teaching in us, in the same way that we drink in wine and eat our bread.
"For man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God."
He wants to be with us. Not just when we are being holy, but when we are celebrating, when we are sad, in all the circumstances and places of our lives. He wants to sit down at the table with us, and be remembered.
Imagine what would happen in the world if we all just did what he asked us to do, and remembered him every time we drank wine, every time bread passed our lips?
I don't take the cross as my emblem, much less the crucifix. For me, its what he asked for, the glass of wine, the loaf of bread. Its the silent remembrance when nobody is looking. Communion is my heart reaching out and sharing my life with him, day by day.
There are so many people who feel such emptiness within, who search and don't even know they are searching. It never occurs to them that we are in God, and God is in us, inextricably combined, part of the same family in spirit, never alone, never apart, not separated from All That Is.
There are so many who feel alienated from the Church and from any spiritual practice at all. They are well and truly lost. Unable to trust in anything beyond themselves and bearing witness to nothing more than death and taxes. They rant about all the evils of the world or stare sullenly and silently at the eventuality of their own death, grim and vacuous and so superior to the rest of us because they believe in "the uselessness of it all".
One wonders why they bother to live, or if they do?
And me, I plod forward, and keep my way, not deterred by all the failings of men and their institutions; the Sanhedrin failed, and so may the Church, and all the Governments, but the Goodness of the True God does not fail us, come what may.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·
Three Keys, One Chapter and One Psalm: Your Future?
I work with confused people every day. Most often they are confused about the very foundations of their lives and their existences.
Many believe that they are free, when in fact, they are enslaved. Many believe that they are "US Citizens", when in fact, they are Americans.
Many think they are "Christian", but in fact, they are practicing a foreign religion.
The Essence of Evil is deceit and confusion.
We fail to recognize Evil, and do what is wrong, because we believe that the Evil we are doing is right. We are confused.
"Forgive them, for they know not what they do," says it all.
We go to war, thinking that we are protecting our country, when in fact we are murdering innocent people to profit evil men.
We store up symbols of wealth and power, and we worship these idols, believing that they have value.
We enter into marriage as a commercial contract, because we have been taught no better.
Truly, wherever you look, you see that the world is upside down. Doctors promote disease. Lawyers peddle injustice. Servants rule. The Good suffer and the Evil prosper.
Yet, we take all this for granted and stumble on?
We already have "one world religion" ---- the Religion of Lies. It has served Satan since the early days and was so at the time of Jesus and still is now.
There is some information I need to give to everyone, regardless of what religion you may follow --- practical information you will need to make sense of things.
Is there one united group of all those who love Jesus at the end-- a universal church, though it may not be called a church at all?
Yes, there are those who belong to him who come from all nations and churches and even other faiths. John 10:16. This is the first key. Expect this. Know this.
How will you recognize Him despite all the confusion and false prophets?
The most simple and natural means of all: his voice.
You will know him the same way you know the voice of a family member. John 10:3-5. This is the second key. There is one voice, and you will know it, so you cannot be deceived.
What is the truth about these times and the nature of Mankind?
"They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness; all the foundations of the earth are out of course" ---- yet, "I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High." Psalm 82:5-6.
These are our times and this is our nature. This is the third key.
Those who correct their understanding and yield to the Truth within, will live as children of the most High God. They will rise up and be like the Good Shepherd they follow, certain of their steps, humble in their gladness.
No earthly power can cheat them of what they are. All their treasure is in Heaven; who will take it from them? Surely, their portion is set aside, and what part of it was not earned?
These are things for us to think upon and know in these days when we are tested and the Devil tries his final Grand Slams, his Biggest Lies, his most devious Plans.
We shall come from the far corners of the Earth, from all races and nations, from all faiths and systems of belief, for we are called as a sheep is called by its name and by its Shepherd. We are called despite all differences.
We shall hear his voice and we shall answer. We will not be deceived. We will not be confused. At no moment will we be left unguarded. We are safe with our Shepherd and our Shepherd is with us.
We shall see the Darkness, but not be dismayed; we are the children of the most High God, made for this day and in His image.
So now you know who you truly are and what to expect in the days to come. Let nothing make you afraid, for the days of Satan are done and his outcome is assured.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Many believe that they are "US Citizens", when in fact, they are Americans.
Not me! I am a Meat Popsicle and I object to being called 'A People'. Surgeons have invented methods to separate Siamese twins but I have never heard of a procedure to rejoin them E Pluribus Unum.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·
State Citizens v. US Citizens Status
It has come as a great shock to some people to learn that there are two completely separate political statuses in this country that are the result of service obligations of public employees known as either "United States Citizens" or "Citizens of the United States" and those being served, the People of the States.
This fundamental fact should be taught to every schoolchild in America, but as a result of lapses and the self-interest of our employees, has not been.
The unincorporated States of the Union acting by and through their unincorporated Holding Company, The United States of America, are the actual Landlords and Employers of the Federal Government, both Territorial and Municipal.
The People of the States are the owners and operators of the States of the Union. We are owed the Good Faith Service of all Federal Employees and Agencies and the prompt and correct consideration of our proper political status, once we claim it and properly, explicitly enunciate our Will to be recognized as American State Nationals or American State Citizens.
A brief citational history was recently forwarded to me by a reader and as I like the way this is organized, I am publishing it as an education "short course" in the subject and as proof, if any is needed, that Americans are naturally Lawful Persons and occupy a political status separate from US Citizens:
1. State Citizens v. US Citizens
2.
3. "There are two classes of citizens, citizens of the United States and of the State. And one may be a citizen of the former without being a citizen of the latter" Gardina v. Board of Registers 48 So. 788, 169 Ala. 155 (1909)
4.
5. Federal citizenship is a municipal franchise domiciled in the District of Columbia, and the political rights of federal citizens are franchises which they hold as privileges at the legislative discretion of Congress.” (Murphy v. Ramsey , 114 U.S. 15 (1885)).
6.
7. "The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States," US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957
8.
9. "Therefore, the U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an "individual entity."
10. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.
11.
12. “A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
13.
14. "There is in our Political System, a government of each of the several states and a government of the United States Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own." . US vs. Cruikshank, 92 US 542,
15.
16. "...the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States do not necessarily include all the rights protected by the first eight amendments to the Federal constitution against the powers of the Federal government." Maxwell v Dow, 20 S.C.R. 448, at pg 455;
17.
18. "The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the "citizenship" to the agencies of government."
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
19.
20.
21. "...it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States. ..... A citizen of any one of the States of the Union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing." Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep. 300
22.
23. This can also be confirmed in the definitions section of Title 5 USC, Title 26 USC, and Title 1 USC.
24.
25. Therefore a US citizen is a piece of property. If you read any of those old court cases prior to the civil war where slavery was the issue, the debate was ALWAYS over property rights, therefore a US citizen, is a SLAVE.
26.
27. The Fourteenth Amendment defines what a US citizen is;
28.
29. "Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,....."
30.
31. The so-called Fourteenth Amendment criminally converts US citizenship completely upside down from what the founding fathers intended.
32.
33. A US citizen is a corporation:
34.
35. Congressional Record , June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A "citizen of the United States" is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.
36.
37. “...it is evident that they [US citizens] have not the political'[ rights]' which are vested in citizens of the States. They are not constituents of any community in which is vested any sovereign power of government. Their position partakes more of the character of subjects than of citizens. They are subject to the laws of the United States, but have no voice in its management. If they are allowed to make laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the sanction of a Government in which they are not represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the political '[rights]' of citizens they cannot enjoy…” People v. De La Guerra,40 Cal. 311, 342 (A.D. 1870)
40. Del Sharp United States Code that uses “American national” while maintaining no such status as 14th Amendment “naturalized citizen of the United States”.
41. 8 U.S.C. § 1502 : Certificate of nationality issued by Secretary of State for person not a naturalized citizen of United States for use in proceedings of a foreign state.
42. The Secretary of State is authorized to issue, in his discretion and in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by him, a certificate of nationality for any person not a naturalized citizen of the United States who presents satisfactory evidence that he is an AMERICAN NATIONAL and that such certificate is needed for use in judicial or administrative proceedings in a foreign state. Such certificate shall be solely for use in the case for which it was issued and shall be transmitted by the Secretary of State through appropriate official channels to the judicial or administrative officers of the FOREIGN STATE in which it is to be used.
43. 19 Corpus Juris Secundum § 883, [t]he United States government is a FOREIGN CORPORATION with respect to a state.
44. 8 USC § 1101(a)(21), [t]he term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.”
45. 8 USC § 1101(a)(22), [t]he term “national of the United States” means
46. (A) a citizen of the United States, or
47. (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.
48. American national ≠ national/citizen of the United States
49. These are TWO distinct status’ within the American system. The former is a freeman, the latter is a voluntary slave subject to the jurisdiction thereof created by section 1 of the 14th Amendment. It is a FEDERALLY CREATED capacity/title that owes allegiance to it.
I trust that this is the "end" of any debate about the issue.
If you wish to be considered a "US Citizen" of any kind, you may adopt that status and act as a Legal Person. If you wish to retain your natural born capacity and wish to act as a Lawful Person and act exclusively as an American State National or American State Citizen, you may declare your intent and claim/reclaim and record your natural political status as an American---- which is what I recommend and what our paperwork process is designed to accomplish.
At no time before or since the so-called American Civil War have any of our States been engaged in any form of warfare since 1814; we are owed the Law of Peace, AR 27-161-1 from the Territorial Government and agreed upon Service from the Municipal Government, which, with respect to us, is limited to perform its operations within the ten miles square of the District of Columbia.
Those of us who declare ourselves and record our political status as peaceful American State Citizens are owed all protections and guarantees of both The Constitution of the United States of America (Territorial Government) and The Constitution of the United States (Municipal Government) without any presumption of the existence of US Citizenship obligations of any kind.
In the same token, we are obligated by those same venerable agreements to not interfere in the functions of the Federal Government and to "stay in our lane" in the day to day operation of our own affairs. If we claim our State National or State Citizen status, we accept it as our singular political status and/or obligation of citizenship, and we do not claim any other political status in conflict of interest.
So, if you are a "US Citizen" you cannot at the same time be considered an "American State National" or "American State Citizen" by any State of the Union, even though your Federal Employer may allow you to claim Dual Citizenship during your period of service employment and may recognize your actual nationality as that of an American.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·
Read It and Weep
I am so sick of hearing the snakes --- the real ones --- whipping up on me for my "service" to Pope Benedict, which was in fact a service to the American People as demonstrated very clearly by the example of the Letter to Cardinal George of Chicago, posted as Article 1 on my website, and as fully detailed in my book, Disclosure 101. (See www.annavonreitz.com, Article 1.)
To all those who have slandered me and accused me of being a "Vatican Agent" based on their own ignorance and false assumptions, take heed.
A "private attorney" seeks to overturn wrong-doing and the return of assets to the people they are owed to. If you don't want your property returned to you, then continue to make false assumptions and spread false claims and rumors about what I have done and am doing toward that aim.
Continue to call me a "snake" because I grasp the language of snakes and have the education to beat them at their own game.
God knows you don't stand a chance without me and many other people like me to defend your interests before you even know that they are in danger.
Ignore the admonition to be "Wise as serpents and gentle as doves.".
Show what fools you are in public and stand ready to be shamed to the soles of your feet
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
"It has come as a great shock to some people to learn that there are two completely separate political statuses in this country"
It might even come as more of a shock that there are more than two political statuses ... many, many more.
Take for example women. Early on they had a political status of NULL. Actually this is a NON-political status and when you have a universe of people willing to express the sovereignty of their own political view the NON-political status works pretty well to isolate one from the irrational opinion of a crowd of 'sovereigns' willing to kill to enforce their own will. In my opinion this NON-political status was superior but evidently many women did not share this view and so now the battle cry of those who have chosen a political status is EQUAL RIGHTS!!! This group (aka 'women') clearly have abandoned superior rights for mere equality.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 mins ·
The Cost of Freedom
First, everyone must resist the Snooze Button long enough to realize that the THINGS in Washington, DC, are not and have never been the American Government.
Those THINGS comprising what is left of the Federal Government operating out of the District of Columbia, are foreign, for-profit, commercial corporations in the business of providing governmental services under contract. A full one-third of the "Federal Government" is missing, and it happens to be the third that belongs to us.
The American Government is and always has been vested entirely in the living people and their Lawful Persons and their geographically-defined States.
If you want to be free and live as an American, then you have to step up to the plate and accept the responsibility of self-governance. You have to explicitly declare your political status and operate as a Lawful Person.
If you want to be harassed and bossed around and "Nanny-stated" then you can just stay where you are, as a "presumed" Ward of the "State of State" and you can operate as a "Legal Person" and as a "US Citizen" of some kind.
But be aware that "US Citizens" are not free, cannot own land in this country, and are required to pay for all the services they demand by armed thugs.
The key PERSONS responsible for recognizing your political status are: (1) the District (as in District of Columbia) Attorneys, and (2) the US Secretary of State. This is because these Officers and Departments are particularly responsible for keeping track of who is in their jurisdiction and who is "without" it.
It is your responsibility to keep them fully informed.
It is also your responsibility to put form to function by assembling your State of the Union once you decide to act as an adult American and to not "accept" the political status of an "infant decedent".
Americans have long paid the other costs of freedom in both blood and sweat, but the one cost that is most important, indeed, crucial to all the rest, we neglect. We have earned the right to self-govern, and then, fail to do so.
Run, don't walk, to get your political status corrected and evidence of the correction placed as Notice on the land recording district records, then boot up your State Assembly.
Claim your identity as an American State Citizen and do the one crucial duty left to perform: self-govern, so that you are not "presumed" to be any THING or anyone, but who you truly are: an American.
It should be self-evident that US Citizens are not acting as Americans, and vice versa; otherwise, why would these different designations exist?
It should be self-evident that our States of the Union are our Nations and that these are sovereign entities, while any greater group effort that binds them together as a Union, a Federation, or a Confederation is not sovereign, but is instead an Agent, either unincorporated or incorporated, of the sovereign States.
We are Wisconsinites, Texans, Vermonters, Floridians, and New Yorkers. We are Californians and Oregonians and Montanans and Iowans. We are Minnesotans and Tennesseans and Kentuckians. We are all the faces and place of fifty actual States of the Union.
We are not corporate employees acting under contract to provide governmental services. That is, we are not "US Citizens" nor are we "Citizens of the United States".
We are the actual, factual, living and breathing People of this country and We, are the Employers-in-Fact, of all those foreign governmental service providers operating as "US Citizens".
I recently saw another slam piece of Yellow Journalism accusing me of leading you into "captivity".
I have news for you, you are already being held captive by your own employees, and forced to pay whatever they want you to pay for whatever services these "US Citizens" want to provide.
And it all because you have not paid the final Cost of Freedom ---- you have failed to act in your proper capacity as an American, failed to operate as a Lawful Person, failed to assemble your State of the Union, and failed to self-govern.
So, in your "absence" your employees are governing you and picking your pockets and telling you when to stand up and when to sit down and what services you will receive and what services won't be available and when to blow your noses. You live in fear of your own employees.
And whose fault is that?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
The US Citizen Blues
Let's make it clear that while you persist in calling yourself a "US Citizen" and acting "as" a US Citizen, you are laboring under a number of profound disadvantages.
"US Citizens" have no access to the Constitutions nor to their guarantees and never have had. The political status of a "United States Citizen" (Territorial) and also that of "Citizen of the United States" (Municipal) was created by the Constitutions, and therefore, obviously, people adopting either one or both of these political status obligations are NOT Parties to the Constitutions. By definition.
The most "US Citizens" have is a promise of "Equal Civil Rights" which gets suspended during "National Emergencies"--- and so far as the corporations in DC are concerned, they are in a near-constant "state of emergency" as a result of their own mismanagement.
Some specific rights, like the right to Habeas Corpus, have even been suspended by Executive Order of the Commander in Chief since 1863. So there are numerous exceptions where even when there isn't a "national emergency", US Citizens are denied truly Equal Civil Rights.
The point is --- what Congress gives, the Congress --- or the President --- can take away. Why? Because "Civil Rights" are privileges conferred by the "Civil Government" --- that is, the Municipal Government of the United States. They have nothing to do with the "Natural and Unalienable Rights" that Americans are heir to.
US Citizens cannot own land in this country, with the result that they are considered tenants not landlords, and in all cases where US Citizens have homes or land in this country, they have only tenant rights.
If they are Territorial Citizens, the Municipal Government acts as landlord. If they are Municipal Citizens, the Territorial Government acts as landlord. And in no case do the US Citizens actually own anything.
They are "presumed" to be "residing" here on a temporary basis, providing governmental services to us, the "missing" Americans. House-sitters, in other words.
United States Citizens are subject to statutory law and function as Legal Fiction Persons. They cannot access the Public Law or even The Law of Peace which the military is obligated to give us (AR 27-161-1).
Municipal Citizens of the United States and their slaves known as "citizens of the United States" are also taxpayers by definition. They, too, are all legal fiction PERSONS.
So there is no advantage to claiming to be a "US Citizen" of either stripe and never has been.
Except for getting a federal paycheck and other payola, there is no reason that any American in their right mind would ever knowingly or willingly choose to be considered a "US Citizen".
Since the US Citizens are all Taxpayers by definition, and Federal Corporations in DC have had a mighty motivation to count everyone in sight as "US Citizens" and to make it difficult for the rest of us who are not employed by the "Federal Government" to (1) claim our birthrights and (2) live in a militaristic society dominated by our employees and all their regimentation.
Nonetheless, unless they wish to be declared in open rebellion and guilty of committing treason and violation of international law and risk having their assumed commercial contracts voided, the corporations in DC are obligated to recognize your claim of either American State National status (no obligation to any government, except to keep the peace and cause no harm) or American State Citizen (involved in staffing the actual State Government you are owed).
The specific Offices responsible for recognizing your correct political status are: The United States Secretary of State, and The United States Attorney General's Office, and right after them, The United States Secretary of the Treasury.
On the local level, the State of State Governors, the State Secretaries of State, the State Attorney Generals, the Commissioners of the Departments of Natural Resources, and the District Attorneys are all obligated to recognize and provide the protections of your American State National and/or American State Citizen political status.
And to a man, they religiously fail to do so and get away with this "neglect" because nobody is claiming their rightful political status as Americans and nobody is holding them accountable.
Now, obviously, most Americans are not aware that they have been "presumed upon" and misidentified as US Citizens. They have gone about their lives thinking, "Well, of course, I am an American! Any fool can see that!" --- but "Misery Loves Company" and the members of Congress are an odd mix of clueless and criminal and they are greedy for tax dollars and power--- with the result that you have been systematically misidentified as a "volunteer" and as a "US Citizen".
What are you going to do about it? Well, first of all, you need to know who and what you are and the fact that your nationality is determined by your place of birth on Earth. You were born within the borders of an American State, on its land and soil, and by definition you are an American, not a "US Citizen".
Your physically defined State is your Nation. You are a Texan, a Wisconsinite, a New Yorker.... that is your nationality, and more generally, you are an American.
Anyone who says differently is "mis-characterizing" you and is guilty of crime. This is a crime under the Geneva Conventions. Anyone who presumes that you are a "US Citizen" is "impersonating" you, because all "US Citizens" are merely "Legal Persons" --- having no ability to function as recognizable physical entities. Impersonation is a crime, too. So is kidnapping, inland piracy, and conspiracy against the Constitutions.
The people making these false claims against you, to the effect that you are a "US Citizen", can literally hang for it. That's why, when you bring it to their attention, they should all be very cordial and eager to recognize the fact that you are not and, in most cases, never were, any form of "US Citizen".
Unfortunately, some of them are intent upon securing tax revenue and claims of oppressive power over the American People --- like "Draft Boards" --- and they will try to bluff and bully you into "accepting" the status of "US Citizen" even though you are not getting a paycheck from their corporations. They will even try to enforce citizenship obligations upon you as a "contractual obligation".
And this is where you must have your own ducks in order, because they have been plotting against you since your own babyhood and have been collecting "evidence" that you are a "US Citizen", beginning with a Birth Certificate issued by the local British Territorial Government franchise operating as a "State of State".
Ironically, this document, the BC, is also the primary evidence against them.
Once you prove via affirmed Witness Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit (two Witnesses needed) that you are the man or woman whose birth occurred on your birth day and at that place and of that parentage, it is also apparent that you were a baby at the time they snatched you away from your natural and native jurisdiction on the land and human trafficked you into their foreign jurisdiction on the sea.
The Birth Certificate is evidence of crime, the least of which is "unconscionable" contracting practices by the Territorial Government -- which is why when you bring it forward to the District Attorneys and the State Secretary of State and say the Magic Words, the doors welcoming you home should swing open wide and any troubles that you have with THEM should disappear like morning fog.
And if not, you go straight to the US Secretary of State and demand recognition as an American State National and/or American State Citizen.
Be aware, you cannot enjoy your birthright as an American and also claim that you are any kind of "US Citizen". This would allow the employees of foreign corporations to take over our land and soil and destroy our country --- and not just on paper. This is why our States do not allow Dual Citizenship.
So as the saying goes, "Use it or Lose it". Claim it, or color it gone.
Write that letter to the State-of-State Secretary of State and fully inform him or her that you are claiming your birthright political status and that you are acting as a Lawful Person and that you expect to be recognized as an American, not a US Citizen of either kind.
Send a copy to the State-of-State Attorney General, the Governor, the DNR Commissioner, and the US Secretary of State. For good measure, send a copy to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Explain your political status and the dirty trick that has been played on you and millions of other innocent Americans by their own employees.
Demand recognition of your true political status and release from all presumptions of "US Citizen" status.
Tell them forthrightly that you are a peaceable Texan (or Minnesotan or....) owed the Law of Peace from the military and the full force of the Constitutions and that you do not "voluntarily" accept any presumptions otherwise.
If you are angry, you have a right to be angry. This entire country and its people have been outrageously imposed upon and abused by both the British Monarchs and the Popes, and all the while they have been prattling on about the importance of "Law" while they have been breaking it. And also seeking to weasel out of their treaties and commercial contracts.
Hold them feet first to the fire by all means making them accountable --- morally, commercially, and internationally for the harm they have done to you and to your country.
But it all begins with realizing that you are NOT a "US Citizen", establishing your claim to your birthright status on the public record, learning to use the evidence effectively against them, and using both lawful and legal process against them should they offer any resistance to your claims.
In short order --- what must you do to establish your identity and enforce your birthrights as an American?
1. Secure multiple certified copies of the Birth Certificate that was issued in your name.
2. Secure at least two competent affirmed Witness Testimonies in the Form of an Affidavit identifying you (your photo) at your current address as "the" man or woman whose birthday, birth place and parentage are recorded on the BC.
3. Do the Paperwork to formally give Notice of the return your Lawful Name to the land and soil of your birth state, etc.
4. Learn the Spiel and learn who to give it to--- the DA's, the State of State Secretaries of State, the US Attorneys, the District Attorneys, and anyone having anything to do with the court system.
5. "There has been a mistake..... "
6. Present the "Mandatory Notice" required by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
7. Present (if the situation warrants it) a Notice of Liability, making it clear that each Office-Holder is personally responsible and accountable.
8. Acknowledgement and Acceptance: "I know you are operating under the 1934 Amendment to the Trading with the Enemy Act and I accept that you can't speak about it thanks to 18 USC 472 and I duly accept your Oath of Office-- but I can speak about it. I am not any form of US Citizen and not an "Enemy" within the jurisdiction, meaning, or intent of that Act, and I am serving Notice to you in both your official and personal capacity that I am an American and that I claim and hold my birthright political status on the land and soil of this country as a Lawful Person and I have returned from any presumption that I am "over the sea".
9. Action: "I wish for my true political status as an American State National to be recognized now and forever afterward by my loyal employees and I wish you to take whatever action is necessary to sort out the paperwork and spread the news of my return so that: (1) my name is placed on a do not detain list, (2) a proper ID not related to any "Driver License" is issued', (3) any property listed under my NAME is removed from the Tax Rolls, (4) all pending Territorial or Municipal Court actions related to my name are expunged and eliminated; (5) any "federal" liens or garnishments premised on the idea that I ever was a federal employee, volunteer, or citizen issued against my name are removed."
10. Guarantee: "It is my intent to live my life at peace as a Lawful Person, to uphold the Constitutions and the Public Law, and I do not propose to judge, blame, or harm anyone. I am here to claim what is mine, no more, no less, and to enforce the treaties, commercial contracts, and guarantees I am owed."
Is this situation clear enough, even for the boneheads among us?
When you actually work for the Federal Government, you are obligated to act as a "US Citizen", when you are an "immigrant" in process of becoming naturalized, when you are a "dependent" of a Federal Employee, when you are claiming political asylum in the United States from another country, when you are knowingly and willingly occupying a federal political office, when you are knowingly and willingly acting as an officer of a federally chartered corporation--- in all those situations, you are obligated to act as a "US Citizen", but otherwise, you are under no such obligation and under no such political status--- unless you continue to claim such political status out of ignorance.
And absent a paycheck, etc., what other reason could there ever be for an American to adopt "US Citizenship"? Why would you give up your Natural and Unalienable Rights for here-again-there-again "Civil Rights"?
Why would you agree to tax yourself (voluntarily) for up to 60% of your earnings? Why would you subject yourself to more than 80,000 million statutory laws? Why would you give up your property rights and assets?
And live as a "tenant" on your own land? Why would you ever knowingly agree to any of this?
You wouldn't.
This has been a totally unconscionable contracting process imposed upon you from Day One. Now that you are an adult, it's time to wake up and take action in your own behalf and the sooner the better.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
A Very Powerful Tool and a Warning
Until you learn to walk, you can't run.
Many of you are just now completing the collection of your documents, securing your Witnesses, and are recording the paperwork to effectively evidence your return to your birthright political status as an American.
This is heady enough stuff for people to wrap their heads around. It takes time to internalize what this all means and more importantly, how it works.
One thing that should be obvious, but isn't for many people, is that this process is not automatic nor is it retroactive. If you are already engaged in a court suit, the only part of the paperwork that is going to help you is the BC and Witness Testimonies.
Why? Because the rest of it can only be proven to start with whenever you record the paperwork. Up until that time, you are "on the record" as a "US Citizen" and there is no credible evidence that you objected to this political status or claimed any other political status prior to recording your claims.
So you have been living under one system of law and one "presumption" of political status most of your life, and then, suddenly in midstream, in the middle of a court case, you want to change horses?
You can see why judges and prosecutors dismiss such actions as self-interested attempts to avoid prosecution.
You can still go to the DA with the Birth Certificate issued in your NAME and your Witness's Testimony as proof of unconscionable contract, and you can still give him or her the Pep Talk related to the 1934 Trading With the Enemy Act, etc., but this has to do with the basic initial fraud that began when you were just a baby---- their deliberate misidentification of you as a Territorial US Citizen.
Claims of this sort can save YOU from prosecution in a wide variety of circumstances, but come at it from a whole different angle than the other paperwork. You are basically saying, look, I was born on the land and soil of this American State, but I was misidentified as a US Citizen and never told anything about this. It's an unconscionable contract.
And because it is unconscionable (literally not a contract that you are aware of since it was created when you were a baby, it cannot be enforced.
Once you have discovered the fraud and the identity theft, and you have taken formal action to correct it via recording your "return" to the land, etc., the evidence that you are an American and operating as a "Lawful Person" is greatly strengthened.
Now you not only have proof of unconscionable contracting processes leading to constructive fraud and false legal presumptions, you also have evidence of your actual choice of political status and your capacity as a Lawful Person.
This kicks things up a notch. Not only do you have proof of your identity and of unconscionable contracts being exercised without your knowledge, but you have evidence of your actual, lawful status on the record.
These are two separate issues.
One is proof of a "mistake" leading to identity theft and fraud and false claims in commerce--- the other is proof of the capacity in which you choose to act, that is, as an American State National (or American State Citizen) and as a Lawful Person, not a Legal Person.
As both of these fundamentals are established, your position strengthens, and any excuse for misaddressing you as a "US Citizen" vanishes --- any excuse, that is, but lack of awareness of the foregoing. To cure that, you must give proper Notice, secure proof that you gave such Notice, and your Notice must be enforceable.
Now we come to the Very Powerful Tool which can next be employed to enforce personal accountability on the part of bureaucrats with respect to you--- "Notice Regarding Named Entities/Notice of Liability and Demand to Show Cause".
We also come to the Warning.
This tool, which is about to be distributed through the State Assemblies for the use of people who have already collected their records and recorded their paperwork, should not be used in two specific instances.
1. It should never be sent to anyone acting as a Judge or federal elected official.
2. It should not be used if you do not yet thoroughly understand your own position so as to be able to defend it.
The reason you should not use it on a Judge or federal elected official is that they are officials of a foreign government, not merely paid employees thereof. They have a certain form of immunity as a result and it is far too dangerous and complex in terms of issues and jurisdictions for a novice to open up that can of worms.
The reason that you should be cautious otherwise is that power tools can be dangerous until you learn how to use them. Used improperly or addressed improperly, such powerful informational Notice and Demand Processes can break you off at the elbow.
You must be prepared and able to competently respond to any responses you receive back from such Notices. In most cases, you will hear nothing but silence and you will then be able to call your shots, but if you do receive a reply, you need to be able to reply on your own two feet.
There aren't enough Counselors in Law yet to guarantee that you will have access to competent help, so you have to feel secure in your own knowledge before you go forward.
For all these reasons and because only those who have completed their paperwork are fully qualified to use them, the Notices, other than the Mandatory FSIA Notice, will only be available through the State Assemblies.
This is a step-by-step process and there is a significant learning curve.
Form up and join your State Assembly so that you have access to ongoing training and resources that can only be applied by Lawful Persons and for Lawful Persons: of, for, and by The People.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 7:41 PM ·
The Practice of Gratitude
Ever feel the hardness of your own heart?
I have been through so much, seen so much evil, that like most everyone else, I have learned to shield my heart with brick walls and battlements. I have my moats and my barbed wire. I have my "I could give a......." and no amount of human failing really surprises me.
Sins, errors, greed, cowardice, sloth, false witness, betrayal, pettiness, violence, every kind of crime and failure and manipulation --- these are a judge's stock-in-trade.
So it should come as no surprise that I am a pretty hard-bitten character, fully capable of making hard decisions, and able to walk away. I don't cry, I don't rage; I just get stone-cold as Josie Wales and my brain sifts through the sludge like a sieve.
Still, inside -- maybe deep inside -- a living heart remains in me. I still care. I still battle on. And I still feel gratitude.
One of my favorite things is write back to people who write to me and to send thank you notes to those who send donations. I really treasure the few moments I have to do this, because it connects me back to all of you and to our beloved country.
This afternoon, I had a whole three hours to just address correspondence, a whole blissful sunny Sunday afternoon to answer letters and officially say "thank you" to people all over this vast and beautiful land. It is a meditative process and as I write, I am trying to envision each one of you and the places you live: Texas, New York, Indiana, Rhode Island, California.... it is like a long list of old friends as I think of each State.
As a kid I memorized all the State Capitols, the land map of each State, the birds, flowers, trees and animals associated with each, the history and famous attractions. I was in love with America then. I am still in love with America now.
My hardened old heart cracks open like an eggshell as I bring the States to mind, one by one, and I write another letter. There is so much to love. So much to be grateful for.
I love America's people, too. Always have. Despite all the rats that share the planet with us, and their corrupting influence, there is still something so strong and solid about the people of America.
I love the fact that we come in all different kinds and colors and sizes, speak in so many different dialects and languages, arise from so many different faiths and nations and ethnic traditions --- because I know how much I benefit from this Melting Pot called America.
Where else can you eat a French Croissant for breakfast, a New York Deli-Style Pastrami on Jewish Rye with German mustard for lunch, and Chicken Enchiladas for dinner? It's the same way with everything.
No other nation on Earth has this kind of diversity within its own cultural heritage. We are Everyone. We come from Everyplace. And yet, when push comes to shove, we are all Americans.
What makes this miracle possible? The land.
When you truly realize and feel that this is your country, your land, your heritage, too --- then you know the truth about all peoples and all lands and the truth, too, about yourself. You're an American.
Maybe you are a German-American or an Italian-American or an African-American, but you are an American.
So in this marvelous garden of grace, where we live and breathe and have our being, and have the chance to enjoy our unity amidst our diversity, stop and take a moment as I have today --- just to give thanks for all the fifty States and all the People -- the actual Americans.
I am ashamed that I have ever been considered a "US Citizen" because it is plain to see how criminal, irresponsible, dishonest, thuggish, self-serving, and deceitful these foreign corporations have become, how they have acted in Gross Breach of Trust against the American States and the American People, how they have sought to profit themselves by war and conquest and spread the seeds of shame and discontent and prejudice and violence and self-seeking for nothing but money, money, money.
Yes, I am ashamed of what "United States Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States" have done in our names and I am ashamed for them for all that they have done in the name of greed and self-seeking to harm their own country, their own friends, neighbors and family members -- but never once have I been anything but proud and grateful to be an American.
Take that, Michele Obama.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·
The Welfare Trap
Nearly every day I get calls, emails, letters.... from desperate young mothers and fathers who are faced with losing their children to a "State of State" organization, families traumatized to the bone by "Child Protective Services" raids, and damaged Third Parties.
What I mean by "damaged Third Parties" ---- imagine that you are nine months pregnant and you go to your sister's house to stay with her to be closer to the hospital.
While you are there having breakfast with her, the police raid her house and find a stash of drugs belonging to the sister's erstwhile boyfriend. The police arrest everyone and drug test everyone, including you, and although your forced drug test comes up absolutely clean, they claim you are an unfit Mother just because you were there in a house that contained illegal drugs, and they drag you in front of a judge trying to make you sign away your child before he is even born.
That's Third Party damage. The circumstance and the crime or other infraction actually has nothing to do with you, but you get dragged into it. Such a circumstance is only made possible because all three people in this sad story were on welfare and/or claiming to be "US Citizens".
Almost invariably, these young people who get into messes like this were beguiled or entrapped into the "Welfare Culture". They thought, "Hey, all I have to do is fool around with my girlfriend, get her pregnant, have a bunch of kids and the government will pay for everything! I can be her backdoor man.... and it will all be cool!"
But when you abdicate your responsibilities, you also give up your rights.
When you, a young woman, start out your life like this, you are offering yourself as a brood mare for the Hive.
Both you and your children will be enslaved to the British Crown, and your neighbors and friends and family will be the ones taxed to pay for your support.
As a young man getting into this scenario, the prospects are even worse. The government will find out your identity as the biological father, they will assess child support payments plus interest for every penny you owe (according to them--- which is often a capricious and unrealistic amount), they will endlessly interfere with your life and yes, they will steal your kids. You get to pay, but you don't get to play.
I know men in their fifties who are still paying "child support" for kids that are in their thirties---kids that didn't ever get the benefit of a penny of all that money when they were children, and which continues to flow into "State of State" coffers a decade or more after they are all grown up. Now, you figure it out.
Everyone would be miles ahead just to support Unwed Mothers privately, but what would be even better is if parents wise up and make the effort to clue in their children from the get-go. It isn't just about morality. It's about practicality.
Drum it into the youngsters that they are responsible for any new life they bring into the world and that failure to honor that responsibility is not really a viable choice.
If they have kids out of wedlock and turn to welfare, they will be subjects of the government themselves, and they and their children will be enslaved.
And in many, many cases ---- because it is more profitable for the government, they will lose their children, too. The Slave Masters can charge the rest of us more money if they take your kids and put them in Foster Care. So that's what they do.
Once in Foster Care, the vast majority of children are neglected and abused--- and your flesh and blood, your innocent little children, are suffering and so are you--- and you are all enslaved as chattel to a faceless corporation owned by smug businessmen who are getting rich as middlemen.
All those "welfare bennies" are like a carrot in a rabbit trap. They aren't really benefits. They are bait.
Just to be sure everyone understands --- "the government" doesn't actually pay for or contribute anything to this welfare system. They give you nothing, zero, nada.
What they do is stand in the middle and whip and beat taxes out of other people in your community who are working and being productive to pay for your expenses and the expense of your kids, then, they turn around and lord it over you and your children as if they were the source of all the money and support, and additionally, they cut themselves fat salaries and pensions, etc., --- for providing this "service" on top of it.
The end result? You have cured the problem --- unwed mothers and fatherless kids without a means of support, by adding a worse problem --- a bloated, criminal bureaucracy that takes its "cut" and makes things a hundred times worse for everyone concerned.
The only one who is actually being served are all the public employees standing as the middlemen. The actual public, you and your community, is being bilked to the tune of billions of dollars and untold suffering throughout America.
I am just telling you what you already should know, what our Forefathers knew, and what we all need to learn again --- the "government" is an evil. It may be necessary, but it is still an evil. Keeping it strictly limited is what is best for everyone concerned and that should be our goal --- keeping the government limited and out of our lives as much as possible.
But, hey, that also requires us to be responsible for our lives so that we can claim our rights and not be subject to these criminals in suits. Rights come with responsibilities.
If you want your parental rights and want to keep your children and grandchildren under your control, better get your own ducks in order and reclaim your own birthright political status. Better join your State Assembly, too.
Make it your goal to never have to rely on the government for anything.
Take it all seriously and teach your children, too. Your rights begin and end with your responsibilities. If you self-govern, nobody has any right to govern you. Or your children, either. Especially not any officious Fat Men working for foreign commercial corporations.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·
Be Forewarned
The Queen's Government is responding with a propaganda campaign designed to "redefine" the Reconstruction --- an attempt to rewrite history and contracts and treaties using film and a lot of lies and prompted false assumptions to do it.
To answer this you need only observe: (1) the contracts -- the actual Constitutions and Treaties the Queen and the Pope owed us at the time of the Civil War; (2) the results --- they secretively took over our government in gross Breach of Trust, usurped upon the States to create their own foreign States of States on our soil and left us uninformed; (3) the fact that the Reconstruction Acts have never been repealed; (4) the President is still defined by his role as Commander-in-Chief and rules by Executive Order via a military junta instead of working for us and our States of the Union.
These are evils which have been used to usurp and commandeer our lawful government for many decades and represent inexcusable fraud and Breach of Trust on the part of the Queen and the Pope, both.
You will soon be seeing a Ken Burn's style movie about the Reconstruction on PBS. This was rushed forward as a propaganda effort, to try to convince you that everything was completed and done correctly, go back to sleep..... but I and our American researchers are here to tell you to wake up and address the actual history ---- not another British Bunko version of history like you were sold in Public School.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
I'd Like to Help Donald Trump
I believe that Donald Trump is making a very good faith effort to keep his promises to the American People, so yes, I would like to help him.
However, I am prevented from doing that, most especially, because of the ongoing misinterpretation of the Territorial 14th Amendment --- who it applies to and who it doesn't apply to.
At the end of the American Civil War, nine million people were disenfranchised. Those who suffered this directly were people living in the Confederate States --- actually, "States of States".
But, again, by process of deceit and mis-identification of our actual political status, the rats in DC have contrived to mis-identify us as "rebels" in a commercial mercenary "war" that actually ended 150 years ago, and to require us to accept their own brand of "United States Citizenship" --- and enfranchisement as chattels belonging to their corporation, as a condition of being able to vote in their elections.
Don't believe it? Read Section 2 of their 14th Amendment.
So, until President Trump recognizes the fact that a large segment of the American populace that was never subject to the 14th Amendment of the Territorial Constitution has been misidentified and improperly denied the right to vote in these elections-- we can't vote for him.
I know that many of my readers are supportive of President Trump and would vote for him, if doing so would not also entrap them and allow false legal presumptions to attach to them.
This, above and beyond all else, is why there is a vast "Silent Majority" in America that doesn't vote. This is also why the Territorial Government can never achieve a valid majority mandate for anything their "democracy" does.
As it is, though not strictly forbidden by any Public Policy of the Territorial Government, it isn't even certain that we can donate to the Trump Campaign or act as volunteers. These are matters that need to be cleared up once and for all.
I am hoping that the Re-election Committee and the President will be sufficiently motivated to get answers for the 55 million people who read my articles---- most of whom would help him drain the swamp, if they can do so without entrapment.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
Notre Dame - Pope Leo - A Letter to Pope Francis
"I will destroy your Church" --- part of the visions of Pope Leo, 1884. "Smoke entered the Church....."
Please, heed the warnings that were given to the Churches.
The Book of the Seven Seals has been opened, and Daniel's Book as well. I have read it.
There can be no doubt that the judgment against the Church is well-begun and advancing at a terrifying rate.
You must take action to separate yourselves from the evils of the Office of the Pontiff, Cede and Company, DTTC, the securitization and bonding of babies and other outrageous evils such as Marriage licenses that reduce the sacred covenant to a commercial Joint Venture.
As God chastised Pharaoh, he will chastise the Church and Curia. The plagues and the burning will descend, as foretold, just as the Flood was foretold to Noah.
Humble yourselves, repent, give back to God what is God's, give back to God's people what is naturally theirs, liquidate the corporations that are causing all this misery, or as Pope Leo clearly foresaw, things will only get worse.
Honor the work that I have begun to free the people of this planet from lies and hypocrisy and violence.
Realize that I am who and what I say I am --- the Fiduciary sent to get an accounting from the Steward. It's right in front of your noses in the Bible.
We could hardly have been more forthright about who was in charge of what. Pay attention. The Grandmother, Mary's Mother, Anna, is the Fiduciary of Jesus's family.
You know how the Hebrew Matriarchy works, whether you like to admit it, or not.
It breaks my heart to see Notre Dame in flames and other Catholic Churches suffering like this.
If correction is not made by the Zionists in Jerusalem and by the Roman Catholic Church, the destruction and suffering will only spread. All those who are smug and who think that they will not be impacted need to think again. [Including Jamie Dimon.]
God honors those who honor Him.
For too many years the Churches and the Synagogues have been run as commercial rackets. For too long too many priests and rabbis have been stuffed up on themselves and not devoted inwardly to what they preach outwardly.
Even to the extent of treating Baptismal Certificates as financial instruments and buying and trading in souls---- Francis, are you all insane? You allow this kind of thing to go on and think that God will not answer you for this? He will. He is.
God has promised that the Levites must be cut off. Who are we to delay the complete reform of the judicial mechanisms? Who thinks that the mere rule of law will replace the Law itself?
The Curia must understand what they are up against. They stand in the Pharaoh's shoes and under demand to let my people go. They are calling down these plagues upon the Church and the whole world by seeking to continue on in the old and crooked way.
If you want help to end this, you know how to contact me. Where two or more are gathered with humble and contrite hearts, praying in the Spirit, there is our Faithful and True Lord and Master, and with him, is Our Father. The Way is not cut off.
Anna Maria
c/o Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·
Jamie Dimon and JP Morgan, Arch-Criminals
As time has unwound and the deals have gone down, there is one figure among all the others, and seven banks, three securities companies, plus three banking "systems" that stand out as criminals.
Jamie Dimon is a stand-alone Hit Man who has sidelined and misappropriated and "blocked" credit and assets intended for global relief and bank and currency system reform--- and is now trying to "misappropriate" the American gold assets held in Indonesia and the Philippines.
Make no mistake, it was our gold used to buy the Philippine Islands in 1898 and it was our gold that was primarily stored there prior to the 1907 bankruptcy of the Scottish commercial corporation doing business as "The United States of America, Inc."
If JP Morgan thinks it is going to get away with misappropriating American assets owed to the States and People of this country and not go down in flames---- JP Morgan better sit back and think again.
We have all the records. We have the transactions. We have the patents. We have the trademarks. We have the times and the dates and names signed on the dotted lines, too. We have it all. We have all the rats in the whole world, caught red-handed, in their own words, by their own filthy paws, and by the short-hairs of their chinny-chin-chins.
So does anyone want to talk to me? No. They see me coming and they scatter like sheep in front of a tornado, but it won't do them any good.
You can't undo or disavow a hundred and fifty years of financial transactions and public records.
So, listen up and repeat after me: "It isn't going to wash......it isn't going to wash....it isn't going to wash.....it isn't going to wash...."
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
For America --- Help!
I have delayed this plea as long as I can. For everyone reading this, please consider what we are up against: the entire force of the two largest commercial cartels in the world.
As many thousands of hours as I have spent researching and discussing and explaining the current situation, mere words don't get it across fast enough, accurately enough, and let's face it--- some people, maybe half of us, are visual learners.
They don't take in the information without visual cues.
So for every 1,000 people I teach, around half of them "don't quite get it" because they can't visualize it. Those people are left confused and distressed. They try to resolve this by studying on their own, but without a "road map" they get lost and even more confused by the jargon and deceits and endless rabbit holes.
Make no mistake, the Vermin have eaten well in America. They don't want us to wake up and do anything effective. They want us to be confused.
So to cut down on the confusion, we need to illustrate the information visually so that people can take it in at a glance using tables and lists and other visual aids. That requires skills that I don't have.
I need to hire it done.
Please consider a one-time Special Project donation toward a new visual guide -- a sort of illustrated Cliff Notes-type report -- that can be distributed by the Assemblies to give everyone a very, very fast way to take in the essential information about our government, our history, our identity, and going forward.
Getting this done and done well is a potential game-changer, allowing us to --literally-- give everyone an accurate picture. Please help.
Send to: Anna Maria Riezinger
c/o Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
or via PayPal: avannavon@gmail.com
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 mins ·
Roll Call! Listen Up!
You are (1) a living man, naturally having a (2) Lawful Person (Your Proper Name) and living on the land and soil of (3) your State of the Union.
What happens is that you are (1) deliberately misidentified when you are a baby and "presumed" to be a British Territorial United States Citizen; this then (2) allows the Municipal Government to also get into the act and "presume" that you might also be a Citizen of the United States--- all this because your parents didn't know and were not told that they needed to record your birth event and your Proper Name as that of an American State National instead. You are "undeclared" so that allows them to tell lies about you and make presumptions about your identity and political status.
So, instead of there being evidence of a living man standing on the land jurisdiction of a State of the Union, doing business as a Lawful Person named "John Mark Doe", there is only evidence of a Legal Person (a British United States Citizen) operating as "John Mark Doe".
The problem is that when you look at the Proper Name, you can't tell if it is a Lawful Person or a Legal Person, and thanks to the registration process they put in place, it has to be presumed that you are acting as a Legal Person and as a British Territorial United States Citizen until you take action to provide contrary evidence on the public record. That's why we do what we do.
But there is another layer to the scam. Once you are "presumed" to be a British Territorial United States Citizen and presumed to be acting as a Legal Person, you lose all your Constitutional protections. The Municipal United States Government then gets in the act and "confers" a STRAWMAN persona upon you as well. This results in the existence of "JOHN MARK DOE" --- an "infant decedent ESTATE" and "JOHN M. DOE" --- a public transmitting utility, and "JOHN DOE" --- a pauper having interest in the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) --- and you don't know a thing about any of this.
It's all just legal chicanery and lies and deliberate falsification of records and non-disclosed adhesion contracts being exercised against babies in their cradles and innocent people who are never given any disclosure about these practices and presumptions.
When you "sign up" and "register for Selective Service" to go into the military services, you are already regarded as being a chattel of the British Territorial United States Government which just conveniently happens to run the military "for" us, so they pick up their own franchise and conscript or enlist him depending on whether it is done by draft or is voluntary.
Either way, you committed "John Mark Doe", (the presumed Legal Person) to this fate and gave him away when you registered "him" with Selective Service.
Next, after enlistment, they declare you to be "dead, missing in action" and issue a Municipal identity --- a nom de guerre --- which can be any variety of your name spelled out in all capitals, most commonly, it appears in military records as "DOE, JOHN MARK". HE has no rights; he is literally a slave under the rules of their stilted, dishonest, vicious game. HE is an "Enemy Combatant". HE is officially legally dead, so whatever they do to HIM doesn't matter. And this is how they gain "plenary" control to abuse you while you are in the service. This is how they use our sons and daughters in the military to conduct experimental drug tests and inject them with diseases and vaccines and use them as "test subjects" to test new mind control programs and devices. "DOE, JOHN MARK" is totally expendable for any reason or no reason at all.
And nobody is told any of this outrageous garbage going into the service or coming into this world that these madmen and criminals have created "for" us.
After you leave the service, they just continue to presume upon you and continue to presume that you owe them service as a kind of military government quasi-civilian --- that is, if you don't formally give them notice otherwise. This is why all veterans are advised to give notice via letter directly to the head of their former branch of service that you have "returned home" to your birthright political status as an American State National.
Where is the only power point against all this? Right back where you began, as a baby. Your Lawful Person is one of the People of your State of the Union, and your State of the Union is Party to the Constitutions --- able to enforce every jot. Your Lawful Person is an actual civilian and your State (not any "State of State") is the actual civilian government doing business as a member of The United States of America, Unincorporated---- that these jackdaws are supposed to protect against "all enemies foreign and domestic".
If you never understood all of this before in any of the other thousand Articles and hundreds of thousands of comments and correspondences and books and all else that I have provided for everyone, understand it now, re-read it as often as necessary, and stop asking me to repeat and regurgitate and re-explain over and over and over. This is the information needed. It is not going to change until you make it change. I have provided all the instruction as to how you can create the evidence of your true identity as a Lawful Person. Do it.
They, the military government, is under strict obligation to honor your political status under the Geneva Protocols of 1949 and Article 3 thereof makes it a hanging offense for them to do otherwise --- but you have to correct your own records and bring their "mistake" to their attention. They also owe us The Law of Peace, AR 27-161-1. Time to remind them all of all of the above.
The municipal government only gets access to your name and is allowed to mess with you as a result of this "mistake" initially made by the British Territorial Government, so the hammer ultimately descends on the British Territorial United States Government for setting you up and offering the Municipal Government access to your name under the false presumption that you are or ever were a British Territorial United States Citizen--- we are talking here about the "plenary" Municipal United States Government run by Congress and allowed under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 being able to buy your Proper Name as chattel from the Brits. If you look at Title V, Sections 501, 502, you will see that the British Territorial Government literally sells its "Citizens" for a stipulated price.
These offenses against God and Man require swift and determined action, but this fraud has been going on a long time and many people think that their personal profit is tied up in preserving this system; many more continue to mistake it as something "American" when its not. As people wake up and realize that the "Federal Government" is literally foreign and always has been with respect to us, and that it is functioning as a criminal corporate enterprise on our shores instead of obeying the Law of (Our) Land (Jurisdiction) --- we have to take appropriate action to save themselves and to save their country from our own employees--- which most certainly includes the military.
Once you realize the scam and take exception to it, your first job is to get certified copies of "your" Birth Certificate and two credible Witnesses have reasonable first hand knowledge that you are the living man or woman whose birth event resulted in the BC being issued.
Your second job is to reclaim your stolen identity. You do that by placing evidence of your true political standing and Lawful Person capacity on the public record. That's the whole paperwork process -- re-conveying the "presumed" Legal Person and permanently domiciling "it" on the land and soil of your State of the Union is called "lawfully converting" it --- moving it home to the land and soil of this country instead of allowing anyone to presume that you are acting as a Ward of a British Territorial Government. Serve Notice that you have "returned home" to your birthright political capacity as a Lawful Person and anyone failing to recognize that fact is fully and 100% commercially, morally, and materially liable for any attacks, acts of insubordination, false claims in commerce, or attempts to impersonate you from now on.
This includes every District Attorney, every United States Attorney, every State of State and STATE OF STATE Governor/Governor, plus the US Secretary of State and the US Secretary of the Treasury and the military Base Commanders in your area and every lawyer from here to South Africa. They all need to hear this and they all need to hear from you.
Pulling them up by their own bootstraps and with prejudice is the order of the day.
[I don't mean that you are uniquely responsible for this vast process of giving Notice--- I mean that all Americans who are not Federal Employees need to do this, en masse, in every small town and county and city and borough and district nationwide. You take responsibility for spreading the word in your area and I take responsibility for spreading it in mine.]
Your third job is to help organize and join your State Assembly. The actual State Assemblies haven't been called in a 150 years, so don't think that this process or this organization has anything to do with any "State of State" assembly you have ever heard of or participated in. Those are "look alike, sound alike" fakes promoted as a mean to confuse and co-opt genuine efforts to put an end to this.
The British Territorial United States Government has participated in one of the most massive human trafficking, kidnapping, conscription, unlawful conversion, inland piracy, and organized racketeering schemes in world history --- and it has conspired against us, against our States of the Union, and ultimately against the Constitutions which allow these corporations to exist and operate on our shores.
If any American deliberately acting in any offshore "Legal Person" capacity whatsoever connected with the Federal Government entities or their State of State franchises operating in our States of the Union reads this, all members of the military, all members of the Federal Civil Service, all members operating State of State or STATE OF STATE franchises, all subcontractors including those employed by the Alphabet Soup Agencies --- this is your Notice of Liability and your Warning and your Instruction regarding this situation and your obligation to correct it, as well as your obligation to recognize the political status of the American State Nationals and American State Citizens and their States of the Union to which you owe Good Faith Service and Honor and Duty and protection against all enemies both Foreign and Domestic.
We are the civilians and we operate the Civilian Government that you owe all duty and honor and loyalty to. You are not under contract to the Civil [Municipal] Government. Note the difference: "Civilian" versus "Civil".
If any American who is not a Federal employee reads this, this is your Notice and Warning, too. Get up on your feet and get moving. Get those certified Birth Certificates ordered. Get your two Witnesses' Testimony. Get your paperwork done and recorded. Get your State Assemblies properly populated by American operating in their singular capacity as Lawful Persons. The American States do not allow Dual Citizenship. It's all or none. Boot it up. If this country is lost to a bunch of European Flim-Flam artists and crooked scum bankers making false claims in commerce against us, it's nobody's fault anymore but yours and mine for our own failure to react and get organized and kick legal rump from here to breakfast.
This is your Grandma talking straight talk. I have no reason to lie to you about any of this and you can easily observe it and look it up and prove it for yourselves. Get moving. There is power in numbers. Tell your friends, your neighbors --- literally all your "countrymen". And if you can, send a donation to the cost of fronting the diplomatic, legal, research, educational work, and other outreach that The Living Law Firm and The United States of America-- the unincorporated version thereof--- and the State Assemblies have to do.
Donations can be made directly via our websites: www.annavonreitz.com,www.americanstatesassembly.com, www.signinamerica.com. Donations to me and the legal team, and money for our educational publications effort, can be made directly to me either by PayPal: avannavon@gmail.com or by snail mail at: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
To Make It Explicit:
Dear Mr. Trump....
We are running a country.
You are running a corporation.
These are two completely different jurisdictions.
One is actual and factual, the other exists in the La-La-Land of legal fictions.
The incorporated entities may not overcome the corporate entities and the corporate entities may not overcome the actual and factual.
To assert otherwise is to assert that the creation is greater than the creator, in violation of Maxim of Law and Universal Law.
We are the civilian--- not "civil"--- government to which the Federal Contractors owe 100% of their Good Faith Service.
If anyone in the Joint Chiefs has been clueless enough to mistake the Municipal "Civil" Government for the "civilian government" that they have taken an oath to defend against all enemies foreign and domestic---- it's time they learned the truth, isn't it?
We, the Employers, the American States and People, have been outrageously imposed upon, presumed upon, and suffered at the hands of our own employees and subcontractors.
We have been deliberately mischaracterized and impersonated, and then, just as deliberately misidentified as "Enemies" in a bogus and self-interested commercial mercenary "war".
Pretending that the Territorial States of States and the Municipal STATES OF STATES are anything but franchise operations of foreign corporations won't work anymore. They are not actual States. They are not sovereign entities. They are not populated by People --- only by Persons.
All the tommyrot has to end.
We are doing our part.
We are clicking our ruby slippers and we are returning home, having never been aware that we were absent, and having never had the opportunity to take exception to the unconscionable private contracts being made "for" us--- all absent full disclosure to our Mothers or at any time to us, of course--- and beginning when we were still babies in our cradles.
The shame and infamy that naturally accrues to the men responsible for these practices is incalculable. The systematic and institutionalized criminality that this circumstance presents is without precedent in the modern world.
It is quite a surprise to most Americans to find out that what appeared to be their own beloved government is nothing but a pile of European shills and criminals in American clothing, and that our beloved military is part of the problem and the plot.
One of the duties we expect the military we pay for to perform is to protect us from racketeering and inland piracy in the NAME of Municipal United States PERSONS. We also expect them to protect us against interstate and interjurisdictional bank fraud and economic warfare.
We wish for all these MUNICIPAL COURTS to be closed down and for the Municipal Government to be strictly limited as it is supposed to be; we wish for the decisions of these COURTS to be uniformly overturned for fraud and for lack of jurisdiction in each and every case wherein Americans have been "mistaken" for "Enemies" and as "MUNICIPAL CITIZENS" or cast into the role of presumed Territorial "Volunteers" magically made responsible for paying the debts of these "CITIZENS", either.
We wish for the jails to be cleared out and all the Americans who have been incarcerated under color of law based on constructive fraud and deliberately falsified commercial claims and contracts --- sent home. That means every non-violent criminal convicted of "evading" federal taxes that they never actually owed, everyone convicted of thought crimes, everyone convicted of statutory infractions, all the marijuana cases, all of those who were victimized by this national-level identity theft need to be sent home.
We wish for all federal liens against American assets belonging to actual Americans who have been unconscionably mischaracterized as "US Citizens" of any stripe, to be released with prejudice. We wish for all foreclosures against Americans who are not actually, knowingly, and voluntarily "US Citizens" to be estopped. With Prejudice.
Municipal PERSONS were arbitrarily "conferred" upon us via unconscionable contract when we were still babies in our cradles, owing in part to improper assumptions and actions taken by the military to register our Lawful Persons as Legal Persons--- specifically, as British Territorial United States Citizens.
All over America, bewildered Americans are being attacked under false pretenses and under color of law. Their homes are being stolen. They are being mischaracterized and impersonated as tenants, not recognized as landlords. They are being sued in the guise of Municipal PERSONS and prevented from accessing the credit that they are owed by the Department of Defense, Division of Fiscal Services and other "Federal" Departments and Subcontractors and Franchises.
There is no excuse for the continuance of this gross Breach of Trust and criminality. Over $21 trillion in credit is owed to the American States and People by DOD, but that's the tip of the iceberg. It's time for those responsible for this gigantic Cluster Up to pay off and pay up, and yes, we do mean the Queen and the Pope. Not the American States. Not the American People.
We wish for specific lawful and agreed upon remedy, spelled out in plain English, established with simple and honest instructions and processes, that average people can grasp and use to secure the recognition of their Lawful Persons, and obtain the security of all Persons/PERSONS associated with them, as guaranteed by our actual Constitution.
We wish for the end of obstruction of justice and collusion in withholding justice from the American People by the FBI, the various Attorney Generals, the For-Hire Corporate Court Systems, and other private incorporated law enforcement agents and agencies. We wish them to be fired and off our payrolls, permanently without contracts, not eligible for rehire. We wish for the owners and operators of these corporations, men like George Soros, to be identified and black-listed so that they can never be associated with any corporation offering governmental services on our soil again.
We wish for their service contracts to be severed with prejudice, and with no revolving door allowing them to ever occupy any position of public trust again.
We wish for the prosecution of those men responsible for the ambush and murder of LaVoy Finicum, an American Rancher on his way to a Public Meeting on a Public Road.
We wish the FBI to be hung out to dry for their part in falsifying evidence and misleading local Sheriffs and promoting fraud upon the courts against the Finicum Family and the Bundy Family and other Americans who were shamefully, tragically abused by these misdirected private subcontractors acting under color of law.
That's right, we do actually know that the "Federal Bureau of Investigation" is as "Federal" as "Federal Express. Just like the so-called "Federal Reserve".
We wish for the "FBI" and its private parent corporation doing business as THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES to be dismantled as crime syndicates engaged in fraud, racketeering, extortion, political destabilization, insurrection, conspiracy against the Constitutions, conspiracy against the American States and People, and virtually every other crime up to and including pre-meditated murder. The Boards of Directors need to be held to account for their parts in the atrocities they have promoted.
We wish for the specific law enforcement officers who were responsible for the ambush and murder of LaVoy Finicum to face charges for pre-meditated murder and reckless endangerment, false arrest and detainment, violation of Finicum's natural and unalienable right to life and liberty, criminal conspiracy and every other indictment they are heir to.
We wish for all the Department of Justice Officials and FBI and other agency personnel who have in any way politicized their positions of public trust to be gone from our sight-- their entire departments and agencies may be scrapped and the personnel responsible fired, not eligible for rehire by any governmental department, agency or subcontractor for the rest of their lives.
We wish for the IRS to be gone, too. We wish for these officers of the Church Inquisition, acting as bill collectors under color of law, to be ousted out of the Treasury Department, and removed from our shores.
We wish for every US TAX COURT decision made against Americans on the basis of false impersonation, identity theft, and mischaracterization to be overturned, including all commercial liens tainted by these venal practices.
We wish for a sane, safe, and orderly means and process by which average people who have been victimized can come forward and have all such liens, mortgages, and other merely presumed debts and obligations removed with prejudice and recognized as odious debts.
We wish for the betrayal of public trust to be prosecuted and punished in public, so that public employees take heed. We don't hire them to make our decisions for us, to be political running dogs, or run military "ops" on us. Neither do we pay them to be brainless automatons obeying immoral and illegal orders just because someone said so.
We wish the individuals responsible for all these and many more outrageous trespasses to be indicted, arrested, tried, and served justice for their crimes. This is not vengeance. This not Public Policy. It's the actual Public Law.
We wish for the quasi-military Territorial States of States to establish and make available Travel Cards so that our people can go about their business secure in the possession of their own private unregistered vehicles, unhindered in their private pursuits, and not presumed to be engaged in interstate commerce. We wish for these Travel Cards to be made readily available and advertised and delivered with no strings attached.
We wish for an end to the unlawful conversion of our assets, including our land assets, under the false presumption that we are either United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States of any kind. We are landlords, not tenants. We are nationals of our States, not residents. Most of us have been here for many generations and were grandfathered-in before the Civil War.
We wish for an end to the unconscionable contracting processes that have sought to form contracts with babies in their cradles. We wish for you to stop the illegal and immoral of registration of babies born in this country and also wish for the prosecution of all corporations engaged in this white collar form of kidnapping, enslavement, "securitization" of living babies and impersonation of Americans.
We wish for the members of the Securities and Exchange Commission to be sacked, arrested, and subjected to trial for corruption, usurpation, dereliction of duty, negligence, criminal malfeasance, and breach of trust, along with the entire senior staff operating the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
We wish for the arrest and indictment of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the nationalization of all assets in their possession or otherwise under their control.
We wish for Goldman-Sachs and Merrill-Lynch to be liquidated as crime syndicates; we wish for DTTC and Cede and Company and all the associated web of banks and brokers and investors and insurance companies to be nationalized, and all the assets secured and returned to the rightful owners.
We wish for clear communications to be issued to the State of State Governors and the State of State Secretaries of State informing them that they are not actually functioning as States, have no immunity as States, and that as Legal Persons they cannot and do not "represent" the Lawful People of this country.
We wish for them, the State of State Governors and State of State Secretaries of State, to be instructed to recognize American State Nationals and American State Citizens as Third Parties and Lawful Persons operating outside their inchoate "State of State" jurisdiction and also instructing them to stop trespassing against our People on the basis of their own false presumptions.
We wish for them, the State of State Governors and State of State Secretaries of State, their staff, their legislators, their for-hire jurists and all their subcontractors to cease and desist inappropriate, unlawful, illegal, disrespectful and insubordinate behavior toward those of us who are in fact their Employers and whose States are Parties to the Constitutions.
We wish for prompt correction and recognition that the "States of States" now operating are simply franchises of foreign corporations, not essentially different from any other foreign corporation operating franchises on our shores and also recognition of the fact that they are subject to liquidation and/or nationalization if they willfully engage in racketeering and other criminal acts against Americans. This especially applies to the role of States of States in enforcing bogus evictions, foreclosures, and tax liens. We wish for all personnel to know that they are 100% commercially and criminally liable for such actions.
We wish for the respect, care, and consideration that is due every American and without that there can be no solid or rational basis for going forward. Legal fictions can't rule the roost. The tail can't really wag the dog. And the American People and our actual States are still the Lawful Persons who are Party to the controlling Constitution allowing the existence of these corporations on our soil.
Otherwise, the members of the Territorial and Municipal Congresses and the Joint Chiefs of Staff and all the smug and the ignorant bureaucrats that have been employed by the unauthorized Alphabet Soup Agencies ---- need to be looking for new jobs.
Let the arrests of the perpetrators begin. Let the innocent be set free and let the jails be filled with the actual criminals.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
Grandma's Rewrite of The Three Little Pigs
All Americans grow up knowing the story of The Three Little Pigs, but just so the details are reviewed and my readers from other countries are fully able to comprehend what I am saying --- let's review:
There are three pigs, brothers, that are starting out in life. Being pigs, they are aware of the Big Bad Wolf and his appetite for pig meat, but let's just say that some pigs are more motivated than others. So....
The first brother builds his house of straw. The second brother builds a house of sticks. The third brother builds his house of bricks.
Enter the Big Bad Wolf.
Well, the Wolf easily blows away the house made of straw and leaves the terrified owner to run to his brother who built his house of sticks, but the Big Bad Wolf comes again, and demolishes the house of sticks, too--- leaving both the unfortunate Pig Brothers running as fast as they can go, seeking shelter from their brother who built his house of bricks.
Much to the Wolf's consternation, no matter what he does, he can't tear down the house of bricks. It just stands there and all his huffing and puffing and strutting and howling have no effect, because it is made of bricks. The Three Pigs are safe, the Wolf is out of luck.
What do we learn from this story? --- For starters, building materials matter!
There are various groups of people running around throwing together this and that and claiming that they are operating valid "State" Assemblies, but they are not using the right building materials. They are using straw (Citizens of the United States) and sticks (United States Citizens).
So when the Big Bad Wolf comes (the commercial corporations and central banks) they will have no defense. Everything they construct will be blown away. All their hard work will be wasted. And they will be endangered.
But those that took the time and made the effort to educate themselves and correct their own political status records are like bricks, and the State Assemblies they build on the land jurisdiction of their country will stand impervious to whatever the Big Bad Wolves might want to do.
So--- my advice? Build with bricks. Don't mess around or waste time, either.
Get your copies of the Certified Birth Certificate issued in YOUR name, get your two (2) properly constructed Witness Testimonies, do the paperwork to formally convey your assets back to the land jurisdiction State of your birth, join or help organize your Lawful State Assembly. Serve Notice on the Big Bad Wolf.
Then when the rain comes and the wind blows and the Big Bad Wolf is rampaging around eating everything he can find, you will be snug and warm and safe inside your house of bricks---and you will have space to shelter your hapless brothers, too.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
For Jenn and the White House
The original Federal States of States known as the Confederate States (since 1781) doing business as "The State of Georgia", "The State of Maine", etc., may be revived after being "suspended" because they are corporations, however there is another issue to be addressed --- and that is the nature of the ownership interest itself. Can Canadians revive an American corporation? No. They can only name a Canadian Corporation after an American Corporation--- and that will not serve to create or recreate an American Corporation of the same or similar name. That this is true is made more obvious by what actually happened to the assets of the original Confederate States after the bankruptcy was settled. All remaining assets were rolled into [Confederate] State Trusts doing business as "Ohio State", "Wisconsin State", and so on.
If, as you suggest, the Territorial Government and its members, all being by definition British Territorial United States Citizens, could come back in here after the Civil War and simply reboot the prior-existing American Corporations by using similar names for their Territorial versions of States of States --- as in "the State of Georgia", "the State of Maine", etc., and inherit all our ancient rights and properties there would be no need or reason to establish separate State Trusts, and more importantly, the Reconstruction Acts would sunset. So we have the positive evidence of the State Trusts existence, and the negative evidence of the Reconstruction Acts still being in full force and effect, showing that I am right about this and that indeed, the only ones who can revive an American Corporation are Americans.
And who are the Americans as opposed to the British Territorial United States Citizens? The People. And who are the "People"? Those American State Nationals and American State Citizens who are naturally populating the physically-defined States --the States that are also Parties to the Constitutions.
This is proven by the nomenclature used on all the period documents. The republican soil jurisdiction states who are members of the unincorporated Union doing business as The United States are always referred to as "states" up until 1851 when new styles were adopted.
These are also referred to constantly as the "domestic states" or "domestic nations" in the literature of the times.
The international land jurisdiction, however, is composed of Lawful Persons known as "The People" doing business as States, the names of which are always capitalized. The very important thing to notice is that all these entities are unincorporated. The Lawful Persons known as the People who are populating the actual States of the Union are "corporate" in the sense of having adopted Trade Names, but they are not "incorporated" by any foreign sovereign or state. They are a sovereignty unto themselves as all unincorporated entities are.
So--- the presumptions that are made about the various kinds and levels and ownership interests and naming conventions and successor rights of the incorporated States of States do not apply to the actual States, because one type of entity, the States of States, are incorporated, and the other, the physically defined States, are not. This is the root of what is called "the Succession Dilemma".
Only unincorporated land jurisdiction People acting in their Lawful Person capacity as American State Citizens can revive the American States of States that are now mothballed and "held in abeyance". Put another way, only people who are properly defined as Texans populating the land jurisdiction of Texas, can incorporate "The State of Texas" and only people acting in that same capacity can revive and inherit the Successor Rights to The State of Texas and the Texas State Trust.
Unincorporated entities are Lawful Persons, not Legal Persons, and therein lies the rub and the reason that try as they might, the British Territorial United States Citizens and also the Citizens of the United States, can never access the Successor Rights owed to the Lawful Persons, the People, of this country. That is why they have been at such pains to try to secretively redefine all Americans as Legal Persons--- so that they could claim in international court that we no longer exist as People and that our assets are "abandoned". But guess what?
Only Lawful People can inherit Lawful Assets, so they are just as far out in the woods and in the muck as they have ever been--- and now, proven criminals and conspirators against the Constitutions, to boot. This is why the Territorial Government is under obligation to arrest its own Citizens who claim to be assembling States, when in fact, the most that such Persons can do is to assemble more Territorial States of States.
Run, don't walk, to secure certified copies of your Birth Certificate and Witness Testimonies, do the paperwork outlined on my website in Article 928, and, acting as one of the People, join your actual State Assembly of Lawful Persons, or help get your State Assembly of Lawful Persons organized. A list of verified State Assemblies is available on the American States Assembly website along with additional necessary information.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
55 mins ·
The Treaty of Versailles, FDR, and Us --- Not
Nothing Woodrow Wilson signed concerns us. He is very clearly signing for the incorporated British entity operating the British Territorial United States Government and acting as the "President" of a Territorial Corporation.
The only affect that that has or could ever have on us is via identity theft, entrapment, and other readily recognizable commercial crimes and breaches of trust, the evidence of which is readily at hand.
So, folks, all of those who have been running around like chickens with their heads off squawking about Wilson and the Treaty of Versailles! The Treaty of Versailles! --- can stop now.
Each and every time you see a reference to "The Constitution of the United States of America" you know that it concerns the British Territorial United States and not us.
Each and every time you see a reference to "the" United States, you can be sure it concerns the Municipal United States Government and not us.
When you see the minutes of the Conference of Governors dated March 6, 1933, "pledging" the good faith and credit of "their states and the citizenry thereof" --- you may be sure that they are referencing their Territorial States of States and the Territorial "citizenry" thereof.
You may be sure it has nothing whatsoever to do with us, and you may now better understand why they have contrived by every deceptive means of entrapment and falsification of records and adhesion contracts and identity theft to "mistakenly" redefine you as Territorial and Municipal "citizenry" instead of what you actually and rightfully are--- American State Citizens, aka, United States Nationals.
Tell Karen Hudes that she is now facing the actual Priority Creditors and we are not pleased.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
For All the Jural Assemblies - 47 Actual Constitution and Codicils
The Original Equity Contract --- The Constitution for the united States of America was passed in 1787, ratified by the States in 1789.
As soon as it was finished dealing with the first Constitution, the Congress was "reseated" and acted as the Territorial United States Congress which allowed it to address the British Trusteeship while the Original Equity Contract was being ratified--- so they worked next on The Constitution of the United States of America, and adopted as a codicil to the Original Equity Contract by a simple vote of the Congress operating as the Board of Directors for the States of America.
Finally, the Congress was "reseated" a third and final time in their Municipal United States Congress capacity to write the Municipal Constitution known as The Constitution of the United States, which was adopted as a codicil to the Original Equity Contract by a simple vote of the Congress operating as the Board of Directors for the States of America in conformance with The Jay Treaty.
Thus there is one ratification process by which the actual States approved the Original Equity Contract -- The Constitution for the united States of America, and the subordinate Constitutions were attached as codicils approved by the Congress acting first as the Territorial Congress and next as the Municipal Congress----and further sharing out "powers" vouchsafed to the States of America under the Original Equity Contract --- which is the only one ratified by the States.
One must remember that everything taking place during the adoption of the Constitutions -- is a power-sharing agreement between the States operating the original Confederate States of States, and two foreign subcontractors, according to the dictates of the peace process and treaties ending the Revolutionary War.
They are divvying up the "powers" being "delegated" by the actual States to their own States of States and two foreign subcontractors.
At each step, the Congress is operating in a different capacity and jurisdiction --- first acting in public to restructure and limit the American Confederation of States [of States] dba "States of America", then acting to structure and adopt the British Territorial "share" via The Constitution of the United States of America, then acting again to adopt the Municipal "share" via The Constitution of the United States.
And at each step, the Congress changed hats and jurisdictions, moving from General Session to Territorial business to Municipal business.
You can see the actual names of the entities involved from the titles of the Constitutions:
The Constitution for the united States of America --- our Federal Government operating in international and global jurisdiction.
The Constitution of the United States of America --- our Territorial Government being operated by the British Territorial United States.
The Constitution of the United States --- the Municipal Government being operated by the Holy Roman Empire
Originally, only the States of America were formally chartered by their own States; the foreign Territorial and Municipal service providers were doing business as private, unincorporated businesses under what are called prescriptive charters --- that is, they were not directly chartered and incorporated by the foreign governments (UK and Holy See) acting as subcontractors.
After the Civil War, both the Territorial and Municipal entities restructured as incorporated entities operated by the Queen and the Holy See respectively; they had no permission to do this, but there was nothing in our contract with them prohibiting it, either. This is what the flap over the (repealed, by the way) Act of 1871 was about, and this is what cleared the way for them to be able to work all the insurance and pre-planned international bankruptcy frauds that took place in 1907, 1933, etc.
As unincorporated and lawful businesses these foreign subcontractors had to be accountable for their behavior, but as incorporated "legal" franchises of the UK and Holy See, they enjoyed bankruptcy protection --- which motivated them to secretively hypothecate debt against our American assets on the pretext that they were working for us, and then seek bankruptcy protection for themselves, while leaving us on the hook to pay off their debts --- all, conveniently, without our actual conscious knowledge or consent.
This is a crime on many levels, but most essentially is a constructive fraud involving unconscionable contracts and deliberate and premeditated bankruptcy, breach of trust, and false claims in commerce.
The crime is only magnified because both governments chartering these organizations -- the Queen's UK Government and the Pope's Government -- had cause to know that: (1) the American States were the actual Parties to the Constitutions, (2) the American States were, as the Delegators of all the Delegated Powers, owed Good Faith and Due Diligence from their Subcontractors and Trustees, including Full Disclosure and Assistance in resolving The Mess caused by the Civil War staged on our shores.
There is absolutely no doubt that both the Queen and the Pope and their respective governments which chartered, supported, and offered bankruptcy protection to the Offenders, are at fault, in proven Gross Breach of Trust, in violation of the Treaties and Commercial Contracts owed to our States and People, and lacking any plausible Cause in their Defense.
Now that you know that the only Constitution actually ratified by our States is "The Constitution for the united States of America" and the other two "constitutions" were simply applied as subcontracts, it becomes a lot easier to sort the wheat from the chaff.
The actual Federal Government we are owed is supposed to be American owned and operated.
The Territorial Government and the Municipal Government are both strictly defined and limited in their scope by the controlling contract, The Constitution for the united States of America, but have usurped authority by claiming "an emergency" that didn't actually exist in 1860 or at any time since with respect to our lawful State Governments.
1. In order to enforce the Constitution and the Territorial and Municipal Subcontract Constitutions, we must be acting as Lawful Persons --- People --- of our States of the Union.
We are the only ones that are Parties to the Constitutions, therefore the only ones with the standing to enforce them.
2. Our States are populated exclusively by Americans operating as Lawful Persons. Our States do not allow US Citizens to participate in actual State Government, because they are at best Dual Citizens and may act in conflict of interest as a result.
3. Only our States have the standing, authority, and capability to recharter and reconstruct the "missing" American Federal States of States (Confederation States) and designate American owned and operated Successors. Only American Successors assigned by our States have the ability to reclaim the actual ancient and hereditary interest in the States of States doing business as, for example, The State of Georgia, The State of Maine, and The State of Texas.
4. All "assemblies" that include US Citizens are not "State Assemblies". They are by definition "State of State" Assemblies, either Territorial or Municipal.
5. There is no provision for Territorial States of States or Municipal STATES OF STATES allowed under the Constitutions, therefore, none of these organizations have any actual public function or authority at all with respect to our States and People. They are merely franchises of foreign commercial corporations in the business of providing "essential government services" per Article IV.
6. Read that: Territorial States of States and Municipal STATES OF STATES are "Administrative Units" of foreign commercial corporation service providers, acting as franchises of the Territorial USA, Inc. and the Municipal UNITED STATES, INC. like Dairy Queen franchises, merely calling themselves "States of States" and usurping upon and substituting themselves for our missing Federal States of States.
7. "Administrative Law" and "Administrative Courts" are therefore private institutions that do not have any obligation to impose the Public Law, but operate instead upon Public Policy of their corporation's Board of Directors and Shareholders.
8. The problem we face is that millions of Americans have been deliberately shanghaied and misidentified and mislabeled as "US Citizens", both as "United States Citizens" --- Territorials and as "Citizens of the United States" --- Municipals --- and have been subjected to the Public Policies of these foreign corporations instead of having access to the Public Law and the Constitutional Guarantees they are heir to.
9. The further problem is that these same Americans who are being robbed and defrauded have been indoctrinated to believe that they are "US Citizens" of some kind or stripe, and many persons employed by the various levels of these foreign corporate "private government units" know no better. Educating people on both sides of the fence --- both Americans and US Citizens (actual employees and dependents of the Federal Territorial and Municipal Corporations) is a fundamental duty of the State Assemblies and the State Assembly Members.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
Moving the Cheese
I have commented on this before, and will comment again.
It is the stock-and-trade of the perpetrators of these schemes to:
(1) destroy and burn books and public records contrary to their story line---observe the War of 1812;
(2) rewrite or omit history to mislead others and promote their self-interest -- observe your own less-than-complete public school education;
(3) evade and deny and lie about any truth that is not complimentary to them and their false claims in commerce.
These Liars make their livings off of Lying. Okay? So that is what we are dealing with.
They constantly change the Codes and the records and the court citations by renumbering, "revising", annotating, archiving, repealing, renaming, and in extremis, destroying material that contradicts their official version of reality.
And they constantly misrepresent things. For example, they continue to promote the assumption that the "Revised United States Statutes at Large" exist, when in fact, they were never adopted.
That leaves us with what? Oh, the original United States Statutes at Large are the actual Law, but people are left citing the Revised (Non-Existent and Unofficial) version, which automatically torpedoes and invalidates anything they say.
These Agents of Darkness are as devious as you might expect, so you have to put on the "full armor of God" and sharpen your skills of discernment and think about what you are doing and what you are searching for.
Title V was just "revised" again in 2017, and not surprisingly, it has been renumbered and the evidence of the guilty parties sale of "citizens" has been moved --- quite possibly entirely removed --- from the current version of Federal Code.
Realize that what we are talking about had its genesis in 1868 and its most evident fruition in the 1930's, so instead of looking at the Federal Code as it exists in 2017, look at the Federal Code as it existed in the 1930's, 40's, 50's.
When trying to find a citation and it doesn't immediately pop up, look 10-20 pages on either side of the number of the Code citation given. Look carefully at the notations added to the Code as notes and footnotes. These often tell you where they moved "the cheese"--- and be forewarned, you may have to track down several iterations of this same process, because some "cheese" is so good they move it multiple times.
Finding that they have re-numbered a citation is utterly commonplace, and finding that they have moved citations to other sections of the same basic publication, or that they have reshuffled whole sections and renumbered them, is as commonplace as dirt.
So, please don't call me up and rave that you can't find a citation, therefore, it doesn't exist, therefore, I lied to you.
When trying to find a "US Supreme Court" case, remember that there are six (6) versions of "US Supreme Court" and you have to be in the right church to find the right pew.
When trying to find a court case, be aware that they rarely but consistently change the names of "hot" court cases by changing the names of the Parties or breaking up the court record into separate pieces.
For example, a case that starts out as "People of Colorado v. Aims Hardware, Co." will magically transform into, "State of Colorado v. Aims Hardware, Co." and a case that starts out as "City of Philadelphia v. Robert Burns and Company" will morph into "PHILADELPHIA v. BURNS" and so on.
Among old cases you will also find "Split Jurisdiction" Cases, where a land jurisdiction court had to rule on the land portion of a case and a sea jurisdiction court had to rule on the sea portion of a case, creating two separate court records in two separate courts. Invariably, they have hidden the land jurisdiction court case in an effort to hide the existence of the land jurisdiction court, and you will have to dig very deeply into the bowels of the Archives to find what you are looking for.
Nobody said this was easy. This is why we have researchers whose entire contribution to the effort is tracking down certified copies of these source documents.
Be aware that the "cheese" moves, and sometimes, it even disappears for a time, but also be aware that when I give you a citation, it does exist, and somewhere in my records, there's a hard copy of it with a date stamp and office on it.
This what I suggest that everyone do. Go to a Law Library, find your citation, take photocopies of the citation AND the actual book you took it from. Literally, take a copy of the book cover and a copy of the inside pages showing the publisher, date, copyright, etc. This establishes "the Record" at a specific source and point in time.
And that nails the cheese down at last.
Also, some sources are relatively free of this kind of manipulation and you will find that the lawyers themselves lean hardest on these sources. Be aware that the only dictionary ever approved by Congress is Bouvier's Law Dictionary. The common use of Black's Law Dictionary is because of its use in Maritime and Admiralty Law---- not land law.
American Jurisprudence, Corpus Juris Secondum, usually abbreviated American Jurisprudence 2nd, or just Am Jur 2nd, is published by Westlaw and is widely regarded as "reliable" by most courts and For-Hire Jurists.
Therefore, unless you are obviously mistaking the meaning of the legalese, citations taken from this source are widely accepted and may help you find new leads in your research.
Quite often, Am Jur 2nd will "link" associated cases, so if you find a reference to "Downes v. Bidwell" you will find listings to "Hooven and Allison v. Evatt" and other Insular Tariff Cases.
Remember the video of the Mouse v. the Snake? This is the Mouse v. the Cheese Maze. Don't be discouraged if at first you don't succeed in finding a reference.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
For All the Jural Assemblies - 48 Banking Corrections
There are two kinds of banking institutions available --- Federal and State. These institutions operate under different kinds of charters. As American
State Nationals and American State Citizens, we should be using and supporting State-chartered banks and credit unions.
Why? Because of the legal presumptions involved and the relative safety provided to Depositors by State-chartered banks and credit unions.
We long ago advised that non-federal employees and their dependents, should shift their small business and private trust and Trade Name accounts to State-chartered banks and credit unions.
We also suggest that people who have accounts in Federal banks and credit unions provide the bank CEO's with a Registered Letter, Return Receipt Requested, specifically instructing that all funds being deposited in and transferred out of such accounts held in our NAMES be "denominated" as "lawful funds".
This prevents them from getting grabby in the case of a bank holiday or "bail-in" or similar fiasco. Federal banks don't actually have sufficient United States Notes to trade in them --- USN's are a foreign currency --- but they are required to "denominate" the digits held in their accounts "as" United States Notes, if and when Depositors require this.
Many people have had trouble locating the State-chartered banks and credit unions in their State. In Alaska, this information is available from the State of Alaska, Division of Banking and Securities. The State Banking Commissioner in all States should have that information or be able to direct you to the proper office.
A search by one of our more diligent researchers shows that there are only four State-chartered banks left in Alaska, only one of which is truly accessible and statewide in scope.
There is only one State-chartered credit union --- Credit Union One. Thankfully, Credit Union One has State-chartered organizations in every State of the Union.
Each State Assembly needs to research this topic for their State and their Members, and make the information available to them. State-chartered banks and credit unions are in-state Depositories by definition, and as such, are not as likely to be affected by any international banking collapse resulting in the loss of Depositor's assets.
To bring this home to Americans --- the State-chartered banks and credit unions are "George Bailey" and the Federal-chartered banks and credit unions are "Mister Potter". It has been this way since the days when the movie, "It's a Wonderful Life" was made, and it continues to be true today.
The trouble with banking began in 1913 with the passage of The Federal Reserve Act, which imposed conditions that can only be described as contractual lunacy--- leaving only Section 16 of the Act as remedy for it.
From that time on, federally-chartered banks were obligated to function under this patently criminal scheme. Section 16 of The Federal Reserve Act was "codified" as Title 12, Section 411, [12 USC 411] which spells out the remedy via proper endorsement of all banking instruments.
Is it a check? It's a banking instrument.
Is it a signature card? It's a banking instrument.
Is it a court case? It's a banking instrument.
Is it a savings account? It's a banking instrument.
Is it a safety deposit agreement? It's a banking instrument.
Is it a mortgage application? It's a banking instrument.
Is it a mortgage closing document? It's a banking instrument.
All these and more are being bonded, subject to bailment---- and unless you specify otherwise using your signature correctly, you leave the federal agents free to presume whatever they like and whatever profits them.
You have a choice. You can deal in "Federal Reserve Notes" --- I.O.U.'s, or, you can deal in lawful money, "United States Notes". You can use the bank as a "Gratuitous Bailee" or the bank can use you as a "Subject BAILOR".
As American State Nationals and American State Citizens, we should not be using federal "notes"----but as our identity was stolen while we were still babies in our cradles and we were never told otherwise, we were never given disclosure, afforded our exemptions, or told about this choice.
When we endorse anything, that is, sign a banking instrument, we need to use a by-line, reserve our rights, and declare our intent by writing "Redeemed-- 12 USC 411-- in lawful money". This backs up our instruction to the local bank CEO regarding our accounts and assures that our instruction regarding each instrument will be followed.
Every time we do this, we reduce the so-called "US National Debt" by the amount being transferred.
Since the Perpetrator's intention was to create an insurmountable, eternal "National Debt" nobody was ever told how to discharge it via proper signature, and thus we didn't sign the bank instruments in this way---- and the debt simply grew and grew and grew...... ad infinitum.
So we need to use the Magic Words and say, "There has been a mistake."
and we need to transfer our accounts and we need to instruct any Federal banks or credit unions we have to work with and we need to properly endorse all bank instruments from now on.
A small red-ink stamp set up with the by-line like this: By:_________________ with space for your signature, a small "c" with a circle around it providing copyright notice immediately following, and the disclaimers, "All Rights Reserved" and "Redeemed-- 12 USC 411-- in lawful money" underneath. You might also add your account number, but if you are going to change banks, maybe not.
This will make properly endorsing checks and other bank instruments far less tedious and make sure you get the verbiage right every time from now on.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
40 mins ·
The "GIFT" ---- Pillar to Post
When I dug deep and down the rabbit hole, I was told that the Municipal PERSON -- aka --- Strawman, was a gift. Well, it was "conferred" on all of us without our knowledge or consent, based on the false presumption that we were British Territorial United States Citizens and "Wards" of their States of States, but giving us a "mask" --- a "person"--- that is slave and a criminal by definition is not my idea of a gift.
So what is really going on?
A scheme by the colluding criminal commercial corporations to get us in a crossfire and get us "both coming and going" -- and all under three false presumptions:
(1.) The false presumption that we are or ever were British Territorial United States Citizens;
(2.) The false presumption that we are or ever were a Municipal Citizen of the United States;
(3.) The false presumption that these two options (above) are the only possibilities.
In fact, our States of the Union and our Lawful Persons were here before any of the British Territorial United States Citizens and before any Municipal Citizens of the United States, either.
The "US Citizens" were created by the Constitutions.
We were created by God.
So, they simply tell Big Lies about us, and keep us defending ourselves, first as a Municipal and then as a Territorial Citizen---- and at no time are we either one.
It's just one big, jolly Lie Fest with the Brits telling lies about us on one side and the not-so-holy Romans telling lies about us on the other.
No wonder we are confused.
I suppose we could respond in kind by wantonly telling lies, but the Truth is far more devastating.
"I act exclusively as a lawful person. Where's your authority to address me?"
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
Fact One, Fact Two...
1. No organization that includes "United States Citizens" or "Citizens of the United States" can assemble an actual State of the Union.
2. Beacon 37, The Republic, the National Assembly, RuSA, etc., etc., etc., are all organized and "inhabited" by US Citizens.
3. Therefore, NONE of these organizations are competent to assemble our actual States of the Union.
4. Our States are the only ones that can enforce the Constitutions because our States are the Parties to the Constitutions.
5. Our States are the only ones that can re-charter the American owned and operated States of States that we are owed.
6. Various parties, either in ignorance or on purpose, want to avoid abiding by the Constitutions, so don't want us to assemble our actual States.
7. Various parties, either in ignorance or on purpose, want to usurp upon the "vacancy" left by our missing Federal States of States.
8. So none of these organizations -- Beacon 37, the Republic, the National Assembly -- none of them are set up and aiming to do what We, the American People, need to get done.
9. You need to come home while there is still a home to come home to.
10. The only organization(s) out there that are properly constituted of American State Nationals and State Citizens are organizing under the heading of The American States Assembly:
theamericanstatesassembly.net
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
When I dug deep and down the rabbit hole, I was told that the Municipal PERSON -- aka --- Strawman, was a gift. Well, it was "conferred" on all of us without our knowledge or consent, based on the false presumption that we were British Territorial United States Citizens and "Wards" of their States of States, but giving us a "mask" --- a "person"--- that is slave and a criminal by definition is not my idea of a gift.
So what is really going on?
Private property is both the cornerstone and the holy grail of common law. No private property is where trusts excel. Practically everything is done with trusts these days. What you think of as public law is nothing more than private trust law. Uses and usufructs. Private property is not stolen or taken from you by public officials. Private property is seized because your use is no longer useful for your survival. Private property is seized because you fail to return payment to the trust when your usufruct produces an income.
Uses are for your survival only. Usufruct is for your use and enjoyment. Remember that part about 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness'? That 'pursuit of happiness' is the usufruct. The enjoyment is where taxes come from. Everyone in the trust wants to be happy with you (aka 'share the wealth').
I don't know why you aren't happy about this state of affairs unless perhaps you still believe in private property rather than everyone sharing everything in common.