Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
RangeFire - It is going to happen. The Meeting with LaVoy Finicum that Never Happened . . . .
http://rangefire.us/2017/01/04/the-m...ever-happened/
The Meeting with LaVoy Finicum that Never Happened . . . .
January 4, 2017 - Government/Politics, Oregon Standoff - Tagged: Finicum, John Day, LaVoy, Meeting, Oregon, Rancher, Range, RANGEfire, Standoff - no comments
It’s going to happen. Unfortunately, LaVoy won’t be there, but one year later, the previously intended meeting is going to happen.
http://rangefire.us/wp-content/uploa...-1-291x300.jpg
Background: According to an upcoming article in Range magazine, on January 26, 2016, while traveling with others from the lawful occupation at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Harney County, Oregon to a public meeting with the Grant County Sheriff in John Day, Oregon, LaVoy Finicum was shot and killed by law enforcement, Ryan Bundy ended up with bullet shrapnel in his shoulder, and the other occupants of LaVoy’s vehicle ended up thoroughly terrorized.
At this point we know that there were no arrest warrants, indictments, or probable cause for the stop. The other occupants of the vehicle were tried and acquitted of federal charges stemming from their actions at the Refuge.
We also know that there is an ongoing investigation into an obvious cover-up by the FBI about its role in the fatal stop, including alleged efforts to escalate a full-fledged confrontation intended to result in a shoot-out that would produce even more casualties. In addition to LaVoy’s bullet-riddled pick-up truck, there is mounting evidence of an FBI plot to stage a provoked shoot-out intended to escalate into an even bigger massacre.
In commemoration of the one-year anniversary of LaVoy’s death and the meeting in John Day that never happened, on Saturday, January 28, 2017, the Finicum family will be sponsoring “The Meeting with LaVoy that Never Happened” at the Grant County Fairgrounds in John Day, Oregon.
The event will be from 4:30 – 10:30 PST. There is a great line-up of speakers, including Bill Norton from the Center for Self-Government, Constitutional Attorney, KrisAnne Hall, Rural Radio Guru, Trent Loos, Patriot Attorney, Morgan Philpot, Radio Personality, Kate Dalley, and champion of liberty, Garrett Smith.
For more information and/or to register for the event, CLICK HERE.
Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
Kelli Stewart Jan. 6 , Ammon Bundy Attorney Mumford/Malheur hearing
http://youtu.be/EtMOQO3r5b0
https://youtu.be/EtMOQO3r5b0
Kelli Stewart with a report from the Portland, Oregon kangaroo court proceedings for today
http://youtu.be/CJmrzn3yOts
https://youtu.be/CJmrzn3yOts
Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
John Lamb and Shawna Cox Portland, Oregon Mumford/Malheur Jan. 6,hearingl.
http://youtu.be/rSnwWzq-qys
https://youtu.be/rSnwWzq-qys
Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
The US Federal District Of Oregon has launched an assault on freedom of the press.
The FBI visited Gary Hunt, Outpost of Freedom. The reason for the vist was to deliver a cease an desist letter from Oregon District United States Attorney Billy J. Williams. Two of documents linked at the of article are no longer available on the server.
Statement by Gary Hunt, Outpost of Freedom, with regard the Freedom of the Press
January 6, 2017, 7:57 pm
Statement by Gary Hunt, Outpost of Freedom, with regard to the government attempting to silence the Freedom of the Press
Gary Hunt,
Outpost of Freedom
January 6, 2017
Rumor has it that I was visited by the FBI, yesterday, January 5, 2017. That rumor is true It was not and investigation or an interview. Instead, it was to hand me a letter from the Portland, Oregon, United States Attorney’s Office, sign by Pamela R. Holsinger, Chief, Criminal Division, on behalf of Billy J. Williams. That letter was a Cease and Desist letter.
Today, I told the FBI messenger that I had no intention of complying; that I wanted to look into my legal rights. A few hours later, I was informed by two sources that the government has filed An affidavit, and request for a court order, and a proposed order wherein they order me to remove my articles with discovery information in them, and refrain from publishing any more discovery information.
This is fast becoming a matter of the First Amendment right of the people to know what their government is doing. This same subject went before the United States Supreme Court, in 1971. That case was “New York Times Co. V. United States 403 U.S. 713”, wherein the Court, in defending the public right to know, stated:“
Our Government was launched in 1789 with the adoption of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment, followed in 1791. Now, for the first time in the 182 years since the founding of the Republic, the federal courts are asked to hold that the First Amendment does not mean what it says, but rather means that the Government can halt the publication of current news of vital importance to the people of this country.”
The New York Times prevailed and the government could not restrain the Times from publishing the Pentagon Papers. The matter before us, now, is equally, or more important in that the right of the people to know how their operates in their private lives, with “spies” reporting everything that they can about what you do, with no criminal intent, to the government.
This is what the KGB did in the Soviet Union. It is what the Stasi did in East Germany. Neither country exists, now, as the police state was not compatible with people used to kings and emperors. It is absolutely unacceptable in a country of free and liberty loving people.
If exposing government spies that spy on the people is criminal, then I confess to that crime. If, however, We, the People, have a right to know what our government is doing, then the Court on Oregon is criminal.
The following documents are the letter and the three filings in the Ammon Bundy, et al, case in Oregon.
Cease and Desist
LetterMotion to Enforce Protective Order – (Expedited Consideration
Requested)Affidavit of FBI Special Agent Ronnie Walker in Support of Motion to Enforce Protective Order[Proposed] Order Enforcing Protective Order
http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/do...ht-by-feds,pdf
8 Comments
- http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6c63656...=109&d=mm&r=pgMicahla Vaccaro says:
January 6, 2017 at 11:54 pm
What about FOIA? THAT says it all there. Have you contacted Jay Sekulow? Not sure if I spelled his last name right.
Reply to this comment
- http://outpost-of-freedom.com/blog/w...2220-48x48.jpgghunt says:
January 7, 2017 at 7:54 am
Such information as I have obtained is not subject to FOIA (Freedom of Information Act). The ‘secret’ information on the Branch Davidian assault has come out through FOIA, slowly, over twenty years. Some has still not been obtained, and there were no informants. The agent that got into the Church admitted his role, publicly, early one.
The information I have obtained could only be acquired by covert means, just like the Pentagon Papers, over four decades ago.
It does little good to find out what your government did many years ago, because what they will do in the intervening years will be devastating, if they get away with it.
This battle will be fought in front of the People.
Reply to this comment
- [URGENT] LIBERTY OF THE PRESS UNDER ATTACK: The Federal Government is Attempting to Silence a Journalist • FPRN Radio says:
January 7, 2017 at 12:04 am
[…] said, these documents are hyperlinked in Hunt’s own statement, as well as below (the dates follow a yy/mm/dd […]
Reply to this comment - http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ec97566...=109&d=mm&r=pgVicky Davis says:
January 7, 2017 at 1:12 am
On December 7, 2016, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing titled: Examining the Costs of Over-classification on Transparency and Security. Representative Stephen Lynch questioned the witness concerning the number of Confidential Informants (CIs) employed by the DEA and the FBI and complained about his inability to get any information about the programs from these agencies. What he has been able to find out is that the DEA has approximately 18,000 CIs and it’s costing the taxpayers $237 million per year. The FBI has probably double that number – between 30-40,000 CIs costing the taxpayers probably around $500 million per year.
He can’t get any information about these programs and the crimes committed by the CIs because they are “field level” programs.
Representative Lynch should be interested in your information and this attempt by the Justice Dept. to shut you up.
Reply to this comment
- http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/0ae9dc7...=109&d=mm&r=pgPaul Niblock says:
January 7, 2017 at 6:52 am
To whom it may concern:
Regarding the possession and/or dissemination of documents by Gary Hunt. Myself, as well as many others have a vested and intense interest in the exposing and disseminating of the truth, regardless of the Courts belief in the necessity for secrecy in a case where a jury has found the vindicated ‘ring-leaders’ “not guilty”. Removal of documents published in accordance with the First Amendment protected Right of this website will not remove them from the public domain, nor will such action reflect positively regarding the Federal governments dedication to it’s obligation to protect that Right.
Reply to this comment
Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
Teresa Brookshire has a comment regafding the fed's latest action against Gary Hunt. I can not believe this is the country I grew up in. Facebook hasn't blocked the post from Outpost of Freedom - - YET.
https://s19.postimg.org/u6jhjaxer/IMG_1438.png
Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
The vendetta by the Oregon US District Court to silence the independent media continues. Peter T. Santilli, charges dropped, Michael Ray Emry jailed in Eugene, Oregon, Thomas Lacovara-Stewart jailed in Eugene, Oregon, Gary Hunt,
Admiralty law and the Vicar-General (Catholic Church). Ryan Bundy filed documents to related to the Vatican . .
Vicky Davis TVOI News wrote the following piece on Tom Lacavara Republic Broadcasting.org accused of being a felon in possession of a firearm at the refug was evicted from Malhuer Reserve last January. He was arrested Dec. 7 and is jailed in Oregon. https://www.facebook.com/WithChastit...59926810996991
The woman Laurie that Vicky refers to is youtuber Lorri Anderson https://m.youtube.com/user/Dancingwind1970
Quote:
The woman on Tom’s program last night, Laurie “Texas 101” spent quite a bit of time talking about Admiralty Law and the Catholic Church. It seems that the Oregon District court is updating their Local Rules of Admiralty Procedure. They are seeking public comment.Laurie also talked about approaching the Vicar-General (Catholic Church) for assistance in Tom’s case. She talked about a lot of things I’ve never heard before but as I’ve had time to think about things, what she says makes sense if you take your thinking back to the time when the only law was monarchs and church leaders – the Pope in particular. I don’t spend a whole lot of time in church, but there is one “feature” that stuck in my mind in the several cathedrals I’ve visited both here in the U.S. and in Europe.
http://tvoinews.net/corruption/slave...other-tidbits/
HOME CORRUPTION TOM LACOVARA, SLAVE LAW AND OTHER TIDBITS
Posted By: Vicky Davison: January 04, 2017In: Corruption, Featured Tags: Admiralty Law, Oregon District Court, RTR, Tom Lacovara1 Comment
Last night I did something I rarely do anymore. I listened to Republic Broadcasting Org, the Resurrect the Republic radio program normally hosted by Tom Lacovara-Stewart. As I learned, Tom wasn’t there because he is in jail in Lane County, Oregon. Presumably that means the Lane County Adult Corrections facility – same place Michael Emry is being held.
Tom was arrested in New Jersey and was brought back to Oregon. The arrest warrant indicates that the charge is felon in possession of a gun. The warrant was signed on September 21, 2016. Tom was arrested on December 7, 2016 and the warrant was returned to the court on December 30, 2016.
Interestingly, the same cast of characters are involved in Tom’s arrest as were involved in Michael’s case. Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin signed the arrest warrant. The case was assigned to Judge Anna Aiken and then was referred to Magistrate Judge Jolie Russo. The Prosecutor is Nicolas Lichvarcik
Tom was in Burns, Oregon during the occupation of Malheur but he was there as media – same as Michael. There were a lot of informants but it doesn’t seem kosher for Tom to be arrested nearly a year later and while he was in New Jersey. The indictment came from a grand jury so there is no information on where they got the information that Tom had a gun (if he had a gun).
There is something curious about Tom’s case besides stretch of the Oregon prosecutor. On the indictment, the charge is listed as
Count 1: Felon in Possession of a Firearm:
18 U.S.C § 922(g)(1)
Forfeiture:
18 U.S.C. § 924(d)
28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)
The woman on Tom’s program last night, Laurie “Texas 101” spent quite a bit of time talking about Admiralty Law and the Catholic Church. It seems that the Oregon District court is updating their Local Rules of Admiralty Procedure. They are seeking public comment.
Laurie also talked about approaching the Vicar-General (Catholic Church) for assistance in Tom’s case. She talked about a lot of things I’ve never heard before but as I’ve had time to think about things, what she says makes sense if you take your thinking back to the time when the only law was monarchs and church leaders – the Pope in particular. I don’t spend a whole lot of time in church, but there is one “feature” that stuck in my mind in the several cathedrals I’ve visited both here in the U.S. and in Europe.
https://i2.wp.com/tvoinews.net/wp-co...?fit=743%2C420
The barrier between the pulpit and the people could be called a bar. Someone told me one time that the Bar Association was so named because in the old British courts, the advocate and prosecutor stepped up to a bar to be heard by the magistrate. I don’t know if that’s true but I suspect that it is true.
When I was looking for an image of an old British court – which I didn’t find one that I wanted to use, I found a graphic of the structure of the British Court System.
https://i2.wp.com/tvoinews.net/wp-co...?fit=830%2C460
https://i1.wp.com/tvoinews.net/wp-co...size=240%2C236
When I looked up the British Supreme Court, I found that it was created in 2009 but, the court has a badge and badges date back to the establishment of the Worshipful Companies. Livery Companies are patent holders on a trade or profession.
https://i2.wp.com/tvoinews.net/wp-co...&fit=905%2C682
-+
Because of the reference to the Crown on the organization of the British Court System, I did a search to find out how the system was organized before 2009. Before it was called the Supreme Court, it was called the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords.
The House of Lords, in addition to having a legislative function, historically also had a judicial function. It functioned as a court of first instance for the trials of peers, for impeachment cases, and as a court of last resort within the United Kingdom. In the latter case the House’s jurisdiction was essentially limited to the hearing of appeals from the lower courts. Appeals were technically not to the House of Lords, but rather to the Queen-in-Parliament. By constitutional convention, only those lords who were legally qualified (Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, or Law Lords) heard the appeals, since World War II usually in what was known as the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords[1][2] rather than in the chamber of the House.
During the 20th and early 21st centuries, the judicial functions were gradually removed. The final trial of a peer in the House of Lords was in 1935, and in 1948, the use of special courts for trials of peers was abolished. In 2009 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom assumed the functions as the new court of final appeal in the UK. Wikipedia
The significance of the appeal going to the Queen again goes back to the Livery Companies – in particular the Mercers – or as I like to call them, the Whores of Babylon.
The British Monarch holds the title ‘Defender of the Faith and Supreme Governor of the Church of
England. And that’s the link between church and law.
The Mercers’ Livery Company is the oldest livery company with history dating back to the 12th century. The trade of mercery comes from “the Latin term “merx” which means merchandise”.
“The Company is also patron of a number of benefices in the Church of England (i.e. it has the right to appoint the vicar or rector of a parish) and maintains close links with its affiliated units in the United Kingdom’s Armed Services.
“The Company and its associated charitable trusts, makes substantial grants to support education, general welfare, church and faith and arts and heritage. A network of alms houses and other homes for the elderly are also managed by the charitable trusts associated with the Company. The Company is closely involved with the running of 17 schools across the country and supports them primarily through the appointment of governors.
Getting back to Tom Lacovara and Laurie (Texas 101) and Admiralty Law which she spoke quite a lot about in the context of the church. It occurred to me that the idea that people have been declared dead at sea – redefined as property under the 14th Amendment makes sense in terms of Admiralty Law and the slave trade. Consider this – the captain of ship is law unto himself – God so to speak. Africans captured as human beings and placed onto a ship could be declared dead as humans and redefined as cargo – property, a commodity for sale. It would make sense to do that at sea because there was no higher authority than the captain of a ship on the ocean. The 14th Amendment didn’t set the slaves free, it made us all slaves.
This is starting to make sense – why the 13th Amendment would have been buried, why the 14th Amendment was illegally passed and may very well be why Tom Lacovara is in jail – really.
http://youtu.be/mzYfmQvOuKg
http://youtu.be/UBejpmIx79o
Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
Vicky Davis, TVOI News
Quote:
Getting back to Tom Lacovara and Laurie (Texas 101) and Admiralty Law which she spoke quite a lot about in the context of the church. It occurred to me that the idea that people have been declared dead at sea – redefined as property under the 14th Amendment makes sense in terms of Admiralty Law and the slave trade. Consider this – the captain of ship is law unto himself – God so to speak. Africans captured as human beings and placed onto a ship could be declared dead as humans and redefined as cargo – property, a commodity for sale. It would make sense to do that at sea because there was no higher authority than the captain of a ship on the ocean. The 14th Amendment didn’t set the slaves free, it made us all slaves.
This is starting to make sense – why the 13th Amendment would have been buried, why the 14th Amendment was illegally passed and may very well be why Tom Lacovara is in jail – really.
Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
Maxine Bernstein - Oregonian on Prosecutors seek to silence Gary Hunt
http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-sta...fornia_ma.html
http://image.oregonlive.com/home/oli...atars/4406.pngBy Maxine Bernstein | The Oregonian/OregonLive
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on January 07, 2017 at 9:30 AM, updated January 07, 2017 at 3:17 PM
Prosecutors want California man to remove blog posts on FBI informants in refuge occupation case
As a second trial looms in the takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, federal prosecutors are perturbed that a California man associated with a network of militia groups obtained FBI reports on its confidential sources and has written about them in an online blog.
Prosecutors on Friday asked a judge to order Gary Hunt to immediately remove all material about the confidential sources from his website and prevent him from continuing to share the sensitive information.
The presence of nine informants on the eastern Oregon refuge during the 41-day occupation last winter as well as six other informants who worked on the case for the FBI was revealed during testimony during the first trial of occupation leaders.
Hunt, according to prosecutors, apparently got hold of the FBI reports on the informants that prosecutors gave to defense attorneys as part of their sharing of discovery evidence before trial. The court ordered the reports not be shared with others. Occupation leader Ammon Bundy and six others were acquitted of conspiracy and other charges after a five-week trial that ended Oct. 27.
"Public dissemination of the material produced under this Court's Protective Order could threaten ongoing investigations and the safety of government confidential human sources, informants or others," wrote Assistant U.S. Attorney Pamala Holsinger.
Hunt said that an FBI agent contacted him Thursday, handing him a cease-and-desist order signed by Holsinger, chief of the criminal division in the Oregon U.S. Attorney's Office.
FBI Special Agent Matthew Catalano reached Hunt by phone and requested a meeting. They met at a restaurant near Hunt's home after the agent assured Hunt he didn't have a warrant for his arrest, according to a court filing.
Hunt said the agent asked where he got the documents, wanted him to remove his blog posts and hand over the reports he had.
Hunt, who wasn't charged in the occupation, said the government doesn't have the authority to control his work because the court's protective order doesn't apply to him. The order restricted defendants in the case and their attorneys or defense staff from disseminating the material.
But prosecutors contend Hunt is "illegally in possession of protected sensitive discovery materials in this case" and not authorized to distribute them, according to their motion.
Hunt didn't comply with the cease-and-desist order within 24 hours, so prosecutors on Friday filed a request for the court to order his compliance.
"I don't think it has merit," Hunt said.
Hunt, 70, was a member of the advisory board for Operation Mutual Defense, a network of militias and supporters founded by Ryan Payne, one of the refuge occupation's organizers. The board was involved in early talks on how to help Harney County ranchers Dwight Hammond Jr. and son Steven Hammond, who were scheduled to return to federal prison on Jan. 4, 2016, for setting fire to public land. Bundy frequently cited protest over the Hammonds' treatment by the federal government as one of the reasons for seizing the refuge on Jan2.
The advisory board ultimately voted not to support any action in Burns without the Hammond family's invitation. But Hunt ended up visiting the refuge during the takeover. He went to Burns on Jan. 24, checked into the Silver Spur Motel and drove out to the refuge. On the evening of Jan. 26 after state police shot and killed occupation spokesman Robert "LaVoy" Finicum at a roadblock, Hunt put out a call for supporters to go to the refuge, but retracted it by the next day, he said.
Hunt, who lives in Northern California, has written stories under the heading "Burns Chronicles'' on his Outpost of Freedom website.
Hunt quotes from FBI reports on the agency's 15 informants during the occupation. The 130 reports, spanning 246 pages, were subject to a protective order, and each page contains the printed words, "Dissemination limited by court order,'' FBI agent Ronnie Walker wrote in an affidavit attached to the prosecutors' court filing.
The names of the confidential sources in the FBI reports shared with defense lawyers were redacted.
In one blog post, Hunt surmised that a fellow member of the Operation Mutual Defense's advisory board was an informant who provided the FBI details from the board meetings and access to the board's electronic folders containing various documents, Walker wrote in the affidavit.
Hunt said he has written about the informants because he believes that "every defendant has a right to meet his accusers'' to prepare their defense. He expects his blog posts might help the second round of defendants charged in the refuge takeover, who are set to go to trial on Feb. 14.
"If the government can get into my records, email and drop box accounts, why can't we look at their records?'' he said.
Hunt has not posted on his blog the FBI records, but has quoted excerpts from them.
In another blog post called, "Informants, What To Do About Them?'' Hunt wrote, "The matter of informants, and the government's efforts to protect the names of those who have snuck into our midst is a denial of justice and to some degree, the Sixth Amendment right "to be confronted with the witnesses against him."
Walker argued in the affidavit that the identification of informants could put them at risk, noting that some defendants and other people associated with the refuge occupation "have advocated for violence against federal employees, law enforcement, and and/or informants."
Walker cited comments from an unidentified person caught on a video found on defendant Jason Patrick's cellphone. They came during a group meeting at the refuge after Ammon Bundy's arrest. The person said to the group, " (Let's) regroup, get in, go find out who works for the Feds and start executing them. Execute them, their families, everyone. ... Make it a statement. If you work for those crooked (expletive) you're going to die."
U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown, who presided over the initial Bundy trial and also is handlng the second trial in February, is expected to rule on the prosecutors' motion. Hunt said Friday he has not obtained a lawyer.
One positive development that may come of this, Hunt said, is that his personal standoff with the FBI may put to rest some speculation that Hunt was an informant for the feds.
-- Maxine Bernstein
mbernstein@oregonian.com
503-221-8212
@maxoregonian
Re: 150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters
Brad Steffy at Oregon Wide Open recounts the killing of LaVoy Finicum
OwO added 17 new photos.
February 4, 2016 ·
The shooting sight of LaVoy Finicum.
WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGES
Originally, I went to simply pay respects to LaVoy, pay tribute to a Man I respected and visit a memorial site which I had heard was just erected. It was a site that media first deemed a “shootout” Then, that he "charged them" and alas he was simply "going" for a gun when they shot him in the Face at close range.
I definitely wasn't expecting to see a complete illustration of the turn of events leading to his death. The tracks of the shooters hiding in the tree’s, the blood soaked snow, the shattered glass and the deep trench in the snow created by his truck when he avoided collision and took to the snow bank. I was shocked at what I saw and experienced.
I first went out Saturday morning, 4 days after the incident, spent a couple hours, paid my respects draped some American flags that I purchased in town and in the process met some great guys from Idaho who drove all night to do the same. They helped with supplies I was lacking and assisted with the Flag, then placed a Blue tarp, a Cowboy hat and a simple “RIP LaVoy Finicum, an American Hero” plackard made of cardboard and magic markers. I regret that I didn't get a photo of the Men I met but I believe there was some video that I'll try to locate of a special moment.
I was deeply moved but also deeply disturbed and couldn't quite process what all I’d observed right away. So I plotted a later trip at specifically the same time LaVoy met his fate and returned at 4:25 pm. that same evening.
Below are the photo’s and my observation (and opinions) of what happened. Forgive me for the interjection of my opinions, I typically stick with facts but I tried my best to let facts guide the opinions.
I recommend you load up the FBI video for reference as I did as well as Victoria Sharps radio testimony, it all starts making sense and coming together if you see the shooting sight, watch the piss poor video and hear the testimony.
I keep hearing the press telling it wrong and it annoys the hell out of me! A few minutes watching the video and looking at the scene brings it all together. Notice the road flares in the video warning them of the impending roadblock? Me either, because there WERE NONE! Why? Because they couldn’t get their kill that way (my Opinion) I couldn't present the photo's inline so they are each numbered at or near the top left corner albeit fairly small. They are sequentially in order after the first two of the memorial.
PHOTO 1 – ROADBLOCK ON A BLIND CORNER
The Yellow arrows indicate the point at which he could see the roadblock and started braking. As I surveyed the sight, questions started popping from the scene, the first of which was, why here? Why a roadblock on a blind turn knowing that if they come this far, they're likely at a high rate of speed. This caused suspicion. I watched the video again and noticed his brake lights came on as soon as he made the corner and they never went out until he came to a stop 40' from where he entered the snow bank.
He clearly was trying to stop and could not so he plowed into the snow bank rather than the trucks and bodies blocking his path.
This alone should be criminally prosecuted as it was a premeditated attempt at causing harm and placing 4 lives at risk. If we as civilians were to pull such a stunt we would likely be charged with aggravated assault or manslaughter assuming no one died. This alone, in my opinion, seemed egregious and unconscionable.
I made three test runs on the turn and tried to stop prior to the location of the roadblock. I could not stop at 75 mph short of the mark. Each time, anticipating the viewpoint I anchored the brakes. Each time I would have plowed right into the three vehicles blocking the road.
He covered the 1.25 miles in one minute if you watch the timer on the video. Given that he started from a stand still, he was moving when he approached that corner and roadblock. My estimates with elapsed time, distance, and starting from a stopped position, 85 MPH.
While stopped they had taken unprovoked gun fire and more when they decided to flee.
I'm in an aluminum bodied performance SUV and only myself in the vehicle where he was in a Heavy Duty Diesel Pick up with 3 passengers. So if I couldn't stop he certainly could not.
The SUICIDE BY COP narrative is completely debunked by this. If he wanted to die, he would have taken some LEO with him and accelerated right through the lot of them at the roadblock.
PHOTO 2 – SNOW BANK
Finicum, not being able to stop, instinctually did what most of us would do, alter course. If you’ve ever caught a tire in a snow bank you know it grabs you and sucks you in the second your tire hits the snow bank. You see his truck pitch quickly when it connects with the snow and he managed to avoid hitting everyone including the testosterone junkie that dove in front of his truck either to bail on the roadblock thinking he was going to be hit or a Macho” I’ll stop him with a pistol” move. We’re not sure but either way, when the FBI presser said he nearly hit an official with his truck it was a ridiculous statement. He tried to AVOID hitting them but they had the stage set perfectly so it couldn’t be avoided other than to take the snow bank.
There were talk of spike strips but none were seen in the video nor roadflares.
Another theory debunked was that he was trying to get through the snow drift and make a get away, those of you who know diesel trucks know you would have seen a plume of black smoke from him accelerating. Additionally, his brake lights were on the entire time once he saw the roadblock.
They simply left him no room to stop. Just beyond the turn is a mile long straightaway.
Why not there where it’s safe and could be seen. I thought maybe the County Line but it’s further down the road I believe. I’m sure Sheriff Ward wanted to be sure he had blood spilled in his County.
Sheriff Palmer of the adjoining county where they were headed was welcoming them with a group of 200 Ranchers and John Day residents who were anxious to hear how they could protect themselves against the brutality of the BLM.
PHOTO 3 – SHOOTER LOCATION
This was particularly disturbing to me and cooberates the ambush theory. I found 3 locations where operatives were posted up behind in the forest, out of sight. Perfectly strategic for an enemy combatant in a combat situation.
Finicum was a peaceful soul, had NO history of violence, had been openly speaking of his peaceful intent and was “armed up” with two church choir singers preparing to perform at their intended destination. In the entire period of time of the occupation and still currently, there has never been a weapon discharged by ANYONE at the refuge or in Harney County.
Media reports of a “shootout” were blatantly overstated and a lie. A shootout requires at least two members of an opposing force firing at one another, the FBI admits no one from the truck ever raised, handled, displayed or discharged a firearm whatsoever.
PHOTO 4 – WINDSHIELD GLASS
Witnesses Victoria Sharp and Shawna Cox stated that they took fire in the windshield while approaching the roadblock.
This starts looking a lot like a setup as they they forced them into a “hostile” situation. I know this is windshield glass because the Side windows and rear window were dark tinted. There were ample amounts of this relevant to the location of the truck where it stopped. Having owned Body shops, I can attest to the fact that windshield glass fractures in long thin shards due to the membrane where side window glass breaks in small cubes generally no bigger than a pencil eraser. (see photo 5 & 6)
PHOTO 5 – SIDE WINDOW TINTED GLASS
Note the tint and the small cubicle fractures. This glass was abundantly strewn all around the truck site in the snow. Interesting how we don’t SEE much of that activity on the video yet both Shawna and Victoria tell of hundreds of bullets riddling the truck and Ryan Bundy was shot in the shoulder. There is some evidence of bullets striking the passenger side of the truck late in the video (10:20 and 10:47) Why is this? What possible motive is there to fire rounds into a stopped vehicle with people inside who have exhibited no threatening behavior? This isn’t Mexico or Bolivia, a badge does not grant you authority and immunity in America. It places a considerable amount of responsibility on ones shoulders to have the fortitude to REFRAIN from actions like this in law enforcement. This CANNOT be allowed!
Photo 6 – MORE SIDE GLASS NEAR THE REAR OF THE TRUCK
The location of the glass strewn in the snow, most of it from the passenger side is consistent with eyewitness testimony as well. I doubt there was any glass left in that truck after the firing stopped. Shawna mentioned that after the three were all removed from the truck, they opened fire on it again. This is peculiar. I would only do that if I were planning on denying that shots were fired while they were in it to explain the massive amount of damage to the vehicle.
PHOTO 7 - 2ND SNIPER
The location of the second sniper hiding on the East side of the Roadblock. Notice all the branches removed, probably for a prop for his Long gun. This agent never shows up on the video. Doesn’t fit the narrative of a “ Routine Traffic Stop” Again, NO history of violence from ANYONE inside the truck. They had everyone surveilled for three weeks and knew also who was going to this meeting due to inside sources. They called for the Women to exit the truck at the first stop although it had dark tinted glass.
PHOTO 8 - 3RD SNIPER WEST SIDE OF THE ROAD
Across the road and directly across from the roadblock another agent hidden in the Forrest, lying in wait.
PHOTO 9 - PROXIMITY OF 3RD SNIPER
This photo simply illustrates the proximity of the 3rd Sniper to the other two. That’s an awful lot of firepower for a 55 year old Mormon ad his Choir ensemble.
PHOTO 10 - PAINTED MARKER ON THE HWY
I’m not sure what this indicates. It’s in the vicinity of the two vehicles in the front of the road block. Or could it indicate the placement of a shooter?
PHOTO 11 – DEADLY SHOOTERS TRACKS
This was a grizzly discovery for me, not quite as bad as the blood in the snow but it clearly follows the path of the shooter that killed Finicum via a close proximity shot to the face. It matches the video of the shooter where he advances, fires, takes lateral steps then retreats. The small trees are a reference point and the snowmobile tracks as well. It was very close to Finicum. He was close enough to easily discern whether there was eminent danger and if there was a visible fire arm which the FBI admitted there was not. Given the suspect, there should have been WAY more patience in waiting until you confirmed a firearm rather than the possibility of one.
The Expletive, Expletive, Expletive who left these tracks wasn’t quite sure what to do with himself after killing an innocent God loving Man so he walks in circles for a moment then runs toward the road. I hope He has a long life of horrific regrets ahead of him.
PHOTO 12 – WARNING GRAPHIC. LAST STEPS
I’m not sure why they would leave the remains there like this. It would seem respectful to at least cover, remove or bury them. Not visible in this frame is the blood from another region of his body. It was uncomfortable to document and intend no disrespect. The ensuing photo(s) will explain why I decided to document and post.
PHOTO 13 – WARNING GRAPHIC. OTHER BLOOD
Here is clear evidence of another wound in the region of hip, torso area. It’s impossible to say where specifically but it does add credence to the belief that he was shot in the lower or mid region before the lethal shot to the face. This would have caused his hands to drop naturally to the wound and would explain why he points at the agent behind the truck.
You can see the snow tamped down around where his body lie while they processed the scene. For the record, if you watch the video, notice the time that lapsed before they rendered aid to him. 10 MINUTES!
PHOTO 14 WARNING GRAPHIC SELF EXPLANATORY
PHOTO 15 WARNING GRAPHIC SELF EXPLANATORY
I became so enraged when I saw this, I had to wait some time before deciding to post.
In the end, I felt everyone deserved to see what I saw. This appeared to me as the last respects paid by one of the shooters. If you enlarge this image it is clearly chewing tobacco. Draw your own conclusion
It's worth noting that I have respected and appreciated Law enforcement my entire life. In recent years I've personally witnessed some things that challenge that commitment. There seems to be a changing tide of late, I really don't know if it's the media or reality but as these things go as with any profession there are good ones and bad ones. I still cling to the belief that the vast majority are good, maybe I'm naive, maybe it's just easier to exist that way. Whatever the case, i don't know if these were State, Federal or Mercenary law enforcement, I suspect a blend of all three but there is NOTHING good existing here in this camp.
This wreaks of purposeful, egregious, heinous, behavior from a pack of law dogs hungry for blood. It can be followed upstream to the the residing Judge and Sheriff of Harney County, to the Governor of Oregon, the BLM officials and all the way to the White House itself. The Hammonds were made an example of as was LaVoy Finicum. An example of what the extreme and mighty arm of bureaucracy is willing to go to to simply make a point. DON'T CHALLENGE THEM!
Be quiet, submissive and compliant and they'll feed you just enough to survive but never enough to thrive.
Dare to challenge them and they will take your rations for their own and crush you like the measly peasant you are.
I say thank God for Men like Lavoy Finnicum. Meek, kind, and caring but rock solid, firm and unyielding in his belief, a righteous belief.
This wasn't his fight. He didn't have to risk his life for his neighbor but he had conviction for what is right and what is wrong. That simple.
This injustice is simple to me. It is very clearly wrong. We all know it.
It doesn't matter what evidence "emerges" at this point. We know what it is. Plain and simple.
The question is, will we be quiet, submissive and compliant or will we use our voice and OUR collective might and begin to push back. We don't have enough weapons to take on the worlds super power nor do we need them. We have our founding documents. There may need to be skirmishes on occasion, I pray they are few and no blood is spilled but the simple fact is we all are going to die. The question is how do we want to live.
A question waiting to be answered.
A reminder that some of the photo's are Graphic in Nature. I would even say distasteful. I chose to post them because without them there is a part of this story that will never be told and it is after all, The Truth.
This is a new page I'm dedicating to simple Truth. The simple beauty of the great Northwest we live in, the truth about what's going on here and those who are threatening truth and simplicity with lies and corruption. Truth is always found in the simplest form and although the two can often seem elusive they are always right before our eyes if we only look.
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...e4&oe=5924B0A5
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...e0&oe=5923D923
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...15&oe=5919C9D2
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...73&oe=58E0CD26
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...eb&oe=591F107D
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...e2&oe=58D87777
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...b4&oe=58D7A1D6
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...d4&oe=58E21CF9
