Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Neuro
It is of course clear that there is an emission of these particles coming from the sun (as can be seen in the General path they are traveling). However the question is whether the emissions detected is from ultra high energy gamma rays or from low energy neutrino's. Both have very low likelihood of interaction with matter and penetrate deeply. I don't know whether they would have very different behaviors in a fog chamber when interacting. I would imagine so since we are talking multiples of magnitudes difference in energy levels...
Which also has an issue with E.U. theory since GRB (GBR's) are typically witnessed during a supernova. I read an article on Thunderbolts (who proports the E.U. theory) and this is what they had to say about GBR's.
Quote:
According to conventional theories, the redshift of this galaxy determines its distance at about two billion light years. To appear as bright as it did, the GRB must have given off more energy in that one-tenth of a second than the entire galaxy gives off in a year. The only mechanisms imaginable in a gravity-dominated universe that could be this “energy-dense” are extreme supernovas and neutron-star or black-hole mergers. Because no supernova was observed and because the GRB occurred at the edge of the galaxy (most black holes are thought to reside in galactic cores), this GRB is considered to be the result of a merger of neutron stars.
This explanation makes sense—if redshift is indeed a measure of distance and if the universe is composed of insignificant amounts of plasma. Unfortunately, redshift has been shown for decades NOT to be a measure of distance, and the composition of the universe is 99.99% plasma.
This GRB and its “host” galaxy are closer, probably much closer, than standard theory calculates. The energy of the GRB is therefore much less than standard theory calculates. The small, faint “host” galaxy doesn’t appear small and faint because it’s far away but because it really is small and faint.
Probably??? I'm supposed to take this theory with any grain of salt when I can't get any evidence and the explanation of a GBR is that the galaxy is "probably" closer? Really??
Here's a test, take a Telescope, point it the Andromeda Galaxy which is absolutely enormous, and then point the same Telescope at Galaxy that had a GBR to compare the sizes to eliminate the "small and faint" in galaxy size. I do know of issues with red shift, and have never really considered it an accurate measure of distance between galaxies. However E.U. doesn't have a theory or model for measuring distance either.
Gamma Rays are a very strong sign of nuclear energy, not electrical.
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ares
Which also has an issue with E.U. theory since GRB (GBR's) are typically witnessed during a supernova. I read an article on Thunderbolts (who proports the E.U. theory) and this is what they had to say about GBR's.
Probably??? I'm supposed to take this theory with any grain of salt when I can't get any evidence and the explanation of a GBR is that the galaxy is "probably" closer? Really??
Here's a test, take a Telescope, point it the Andromeda Galaxy which is absolutely enormous, and then point the same Telescope at Galaxy that had a GBR to compare the sizes to eliminate the "small and faint" in galaxy size. I do know of issues with red shift, and have never really considered it an accurate measure of distance between galaxies. However E.U. doesn't have a theory or model for measuring distance either.
Gamma Rays are a very strong sign of nuclear energy, not electrical.
I would modify this statement to include both. ;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terres...amma-ray_flash
Apparently, according to Wikipedia you get these terrestrial gamma ray flashes (up to 20 MeV) from lightning aprox 500 strikes every day on earth. Actually you can test the theory if what we detect at these deep underground sites for "neutrino" measurement indeed is neutrino's or if it is gamma rays by comparing the sun emission with a nearby lightning strike. If they are similar, they probably collect gamma rays from the sun...
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Neuro
I would modify this statement to include both. ;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terres...amma-ray_flash
Apparently, according to Wikipedia you get these terrestrial gamma ray flashes (up to 20 MeV) from lightning aprox 500 strikes every day on earth. Actually you can test the theory if what we detect at these deep underground sites for "neutrino" measurement indeed is neutrino's or if it is gamma rays by comparing the sun emission with a nearby lightning strike. If they are similar, they probably collect gamma rays from the sun...
That would definitely be a worthwhile test.
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
Seems like NASA is going full on Electric Universe in this article. LOL! Claiming that thunderstorms on earth create antimatter that create the gamma rays...
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/G...derstorms.html
Personally I find that absurd. Lightning is millions of volts. I don't see why you need to go with anti-matter to explain photon emission in the MeV-range, it's like going across the river to collect water...
What on earth should Goldie believe in now then? NASA and her on the same side impossible! ;D
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
((they)) have always done this, when a theory they didnt want especially to take off becomes a threat, they just promote it themselves and start changing/corrupt the parameters of the theory. So people will still be learning half-truths. That is how they control science. Einstein and Newton doesnt seem to escape such tactics after what I have read here and there. Einstein is a plagiarist anyway and Newton forced to draft a theory or be judged as an heretic for studying hemeticism, which explains the spiritual dimension of matter. I really wouldnt be surprised if the higgs boson was a total farce as many already claim it to be (CERN is all about money and possibly worse). Meanwhile students are mastering in more scams.
I stick to the original, Walter Russell, and all genuine researchers such as Robet Otey, Matt Presti, Randall, Eric Dollar, Dan Winter.... only that type of scientists and investigators should serve as a foundation and quest for truth. I will always side with the heretics and rebels .
ACADEMIA=DECEPTION
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Neuro
Seems like NASA is going full on Electric Universe in this article. LOL! Claiming that thunderstorms on earth create antimatter that create the gamma rays...
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/G...derstorms.html
Personally I find that absurd. Lightning is millions of volts. I don't see why you need to go with anti-matter to explain photon emission in the MeV-range, it's like going across the river to collect water...
What on earth should Goldie believe in now then? NASA and her on the same side impossible! ;D
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
lol, Nasa is still working the assumption there are only 3 types of matter. They skip over plasma in favor for a 4th Bose- antistate/dark matter.
Now that Trump is in office ofcourse they will be neo-pirates.
They are obviously not siding with an electric universe there. But trying to explain in standard Big G convention. And very poorly I might add, confounding the two
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Horn
lol, Nasa is still working the assumption there are only 3 types of matter. They skip over plasma in favor for a 4th Bose- antistate.
Now that Trump is in office ofcourse they will be neo-pirates.
You couldn't have done a better job hiding your disappointment they agree with you on EU? ;D
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
the are not agreeing but trying to explain anomalous duplicated sensor readings into BigG "anti-matter" again and over and over.
Same thing they're doing with the neutrino.
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
"Hot Dark Matter"... standard physicists are racist :)
Re: Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
singular_me
((they)) have always done this, when a theory they didnt want especially to take off becomes a threat, they just promote it themselves and start changing/corrupt the parameters of the theory. So people will still be learning half-truths. That is how they control science. Einstein and Newton doesnt seem to escape such tactics after what I have read here and there. Einstein is a plagiarist anyway and Newton forced to draft a theory or be judged as an heretic for studying hemeticism, which explains the spiritual dimension of matter. I really wouldnt be surprised if the higgs boson was a total farce as many already claim it to be (CERN is all about money and possibly worse). Meanwhile students are mastering in more scams.
I stick to the original, Walter Russell, and all genuine researchers such as Robet Otey, Matt Presti, Randall, Eric Dollar, Dan Winter.... only that type of scientists and investigators should serve as a foundation and quest for truth. I will always side with the heretics and rebels .
ACADEMIA=DECEPTION
Yeah stick with your authorities. It really shouldn't matter who is supporting a particular theory. It is how a theory is supported that matters...
Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.
Socrates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method
