Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Bundy Indictment dismissed with prejudice ~ Terry Noonkester.
Why is this bastard still employed as a U.S. Attorney? This is the second case he has had thrown out with prejudice for prosecutorial misconduct. He should be in jail for what he has done to thes people.
Bundy Indictment Dismissed With Prejudice
JUDGE GLORIA NAVARRO FOUND THAT THE PROSECUTIONS CONDUCT WAS “GROSSLY SHOCKING” AND “FLAGRANT”.
January 13, 2018 BLM, Featured, Federal Courts
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...ol-630x381.jpgBundy
Indictment Dismissed With Prejudice
by Terry Noonkester
January8th, 2018 is a historic day, not only for the trial of USA v Cliven Bundy et al, but for many legal proceedings to come.
There were well over 100 people that went to the federal district court in Las Vegas on January 8th. Not all made it into the courtroom. At least 8 that made it in to see the proceedings were former jurors on this trial, who were dismissed on December 20th. Many others were family and friends of the defendants and about 30 others were from the media.
Judge Gloria Navarro found that the prosecutions conduct was “grossly shocking” and “flagrant”. She based her decision to dismiss the indictment with prejudice on the need to maintain “judicial integrity” and to “deter prosecutorial misconduct” in the future. Navarro took about an hour to explain the case law that supported her decision.
A dismissal of the indictment is the best type of dismissal for the defendants and the most severe sanction for the prosecution. The prosecution team, First Assistant U.S. Attorney, Steven Myhre,and Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Daniel Schiess and Nadia Ahmed, remained silent through the entire hearing.
Dismissal of the indictment will erode the credibility of the other convictions and plea bargains stemming from the original grand jury indictment of all 19 men arrested for the Bundy Ranch protest. From that indictment, the court later organized the defendants into three tiers, each group having a separate trial for the courts convenience.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...am-678x381.jpg
Judge Navarro also mentioned Larry Wooten, BLM’s lead investigator of the Bundy case for nearly three years, until he was dismissed on February 18th, 2017. The prosecutor, Steven Myhre, had “furiously demanded” Wooten’s removal from the Bundy investigation through Wooten’s supervisor at BLM just a day or two before Wooten’s dismissal. Navarro’s reference to Wooten was short, but the fact she put it in the court record is significant. She simply stated that there was likely to be more prosecutorial misconduct and even BLM and FBI wrongdoing associated with this case.
In an email leaked to Washington State Representative Matt Shea in December, Special Agent Larry Wooten listed issues regarding the Bundy investigation: “Bureau of Land Management Law Enforcement Supervisory Misconduct and Associated Cover-ups as well as Potential Unethical Actions, Malfeasance and Misfeasance by United States Attorney’s Office Prosecutors from the District of Nevada, (Las Vegas) in Reference to the Cliven Bundy Investigation.
Special Agent Wooten went on to explain in his email that “…former BLM Special Agent-in-Charge (SAC) Love specifically and purposely ignored U.S. Attorney’s Office and BLM civilian management direction and intent, as well as Nevada State Official recommendations, in order to command the most intrusive, oppressive, large scale, and militaristic trespass cattle Impound Possible. Additionally, this investigation also indicated excessive use of force, civil rights and policy violations.”
About half of the observers broke into tears of joy as it sunk in that the charges against these four men were dropped. After the courtroom was dismissed, Cliven Bundy hugged his wife, Carol, for the first time in 22 months. Cliven requested the media take a picture of the shackles being removed from his ankles, but because no cameras or media were allowed as he was processed to be released, no one could.
As Cliven Bundy was being interviewed on Lillie Spencer’s video before they left the courthouse, Cliven stated; “The judge Navarro, she did the government a very big favor… If we would have gone on for just a few more hours even, there would have been a lot of discovery made, there would have been entrapment brought forth, there would have been Lombardo’s lies brought forth, there were a lot of things she covered up and protected from coming out to the media and the people. If we go back to court, it will all come out.”…
”Why is America acting like this? Why are we allowing the federal government, these bureaucracies, to have armies?”
”A crowd greeted Cliven, Ryan, and Ammon Bundy as they left the courthouse, Ryan Payne was told to report to the Federal Marshals Office to be instructed on how he would proceed. Although charges are dropped for this case, Ryan Payne will need to appear in Portland, Oregon, in regards to a plea agreement pertaining to his participation at the Malheur Refuge protest. All the remaining defendants that have plea agreements, convictions or are still awaiting trial for the Bundy Ranch protest, must have their attorneys file motions on their behalf to dismiss their own charges.
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced January 3rd, 2018, that Dayle Elieson will replace Acting U.S. Attorney Steven Myhre, effective January 5th. Elieson was one of 17 interim U.S. attorneys who’s appointment was made public on January 3rd. Myhre was returned to his role as First Assistant U.S. Attorney. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has sent an evidence discovery expert to Las Vegas to review the Bundy case. Although unlikely, it is possible for Elieson to appeal the dismissal.
A facebook video won’t embed at end of article
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Susan Lindaur show, 1h 43m: Download
EPISODE #334
AIRED: 01-14-2018
http://tfrlive.com/wp-content/upload...1515961923.jpg
In a huge blow to the Feds, a decade of judicial harassment against rancher, Cliven Bundy and his sons crashed to a close this week. A Federal Judge in Nevada dismissed all criminal charges against the Bundys, citing massive prosecutorial misconduct and hiding evidence from the Defense. Fabulous Cyrellis Gehbendach from the Liberty Community in Montana delivers a stunning lesson on the larger issues of how globalist politics has resulted in federal land seizures,and selling off mineral rights to China, Russia and other U.S creditors. Cyrellis casts stunning light on conflicts in Ukraine, Russia and North Korea from the standpoint of the Obama Administration’s disastrous palming of U.S uranium, as a primary example of massive corruption. Globalists are systematically destroying U.S sovereignty and control over own resources. We’re fighting what she calls “Manufactured authority” whereby self-proclaimed Elites justify their imposition of policy opposed by populist movements. What’s so striking is how it failed against the Bundys. Despite a massive psy-op bussing jurors from Secret Locations with helicopters flying overhead, none of it worked. The people’s eyes are opened. It’s a great interview!
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Remaining defendants want the corrupt federal prosecutors booted off the case
https://i1.wp.com/freerangereport.co...size=560%2C416
Remaining Bundy defendants want corrupt federal prosecutors booted off case
“The appearance of impropriety and the conflicts of of interest have already occurred in this case,” lawyers said in a heavily redacted motion. “Justice requires that, to avoid any other appearance of unfairness, the court disqualify the USAO of Nevada.”
Robert Anglen
AZ Central
Defendants in the upcoming Bundy Ranch standoff trial say Nevada federal prosecutors need to be disqualified and removed from the cases they launched two years ago.
The defendants, including two of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s sons, want a judge to bar the entire Nevada U.S. Attorney’s Office from prosecuting the case.
In a motion filed late Friday, four of the five remaining defendants say Nevada prosecutors have multiple conflicts of interest and should be viewed as potential witnesses if the case goes forward.
They say the entire prosecution team needs to be replaced because they could be called to testify in court about recently revealed documents raising questions about their conduct.
“The appearance of impropriety and the conflicts of of interest have already occurred in this case,” lawyers said in a heavily redacted motion. “Justice requires that, to avoid any other appearance of unfairness, the court disqualify the USAO of Nevada.”
The motion, like hundreds of documents in the Bundy standoff case, was filed partially under seal and cannot be viewed by the public in its entirety.
It comes just four days after a judge threw out cases against Bundy, two of his other sons and a militia member accused of plotting and leading an armed standoff against federal land agents in 2014.
U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Navarro found federal prosecutors recklessly and outrageously violated the men’s rights to a fair trial by withholding evidence that could have helped exonerate them. She dismissed the case against Bundy and others “with prejudice,” meaning they cannot be retried.
The Nevada U.S. Attorney’s Office did not respond to requests for comment Saturday.
Defendants David and Melvin Bundy, Joseph O’Shaughnessy and Jason Woods said the Nevada federal prosecutors have “demonstrated an inability or refusal to recognize” that they could be called as witnesses.
The four men, along with co-defendant Brian Cavalier, are scheduled to begin trial Feb. 26. They are the last of 17 defendants charged in the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff, in which cattle ranchers and militia members are accused of using guns to prevent federal agents from seizing Bundy’s cattle on public land.
The defendants said they are not looking for a change of venue to have the trial moved to another state, but are asking that new attorneys be brought in from other jurisdictions.
“Assistant U.S. Attorney’s Steven Myhre, Daniel Schiess, Nadia Ahmed and Erin Creegan have been prosecuting the Bundy case for years,” defendants said in their motion. “They have made themselves material witnesses and must withdraw from the conflicting role.”
The defendants are calling for a hearing to determine who is qualified to prosecute the case and said any new prosecutors should be prepared to question their colleagues on the witness stand.
“Their colleagues from another district will be expected to examine them at trial and uphold their ethical obligations to the fullest degree, including investigating the truthfulness and consistency of their colleagues; statements made under oath,” the motion states.
The defendants also want to ensure a jury is able to view live the testimony of the prosecutors in the Bundy case, as they would any other case agent or witness.
“It goes without saying that a witness to this case cannot serve as the member of the prosecution team,” the motion states.
The exact details of the alleged conflicts facing prosecutors appear to be blacked out of the 12-page motion. However, the defendants alluded to a report made public last month by a federal agent who alleged prosecutors engaged in a cover-up of information about misconduct during the standoff by members of the Bureau of Land Management.
A federal investigator alleged in a Nov. 27 memo to the assistant U.S. attorney general that prosecutors in the Bundy Ranch standoff trial covered up misconduct by law-enforcement agents who engaged in “likely policy, ethical and legal violations.”
Read the full report here
Free Range Report
Thank you for reading our latest report, but before you go…
Our loyalty is to the truth and to YOU, our readers!
We respect your reading experience, and have refrained from putting up a paywall and obnoxious advertisements, which means that we get by on small donations from people like you. We’re not asking for much, but any amount that you can give goes a long way to securing a better future for the people who make America great.
For as little as $1 you can support Free Range Report, and it takes only a moment.
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Larry Klayman founder of Judicial Watch an now Freedom Watch explains Cliven Bundy won the battle, but now must win the legal war ~ Freedom Watch
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Quote:
Originally Posted by
monty
Larry Klayman founder of Judicial Watch an now Freedom Watch explains Cliven Bundy won the battle, but now must win the legal war ~ Freedom Watch
Can you say controlled opposition?
Born of two Jews.
Betcha Bar member Larry won't advocate for being a Free Inhabitant of Nevada and NOT a US Citizen.
LARRY KLAYMAN (D.C. BAR NO. 334581)FREEDOM WATCH, INC.2020 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 345Washington, DC 20006Telephone: 561.558.5536Email: leklayman@gmail.comPro Hac Vice to be FiledMICHAEL D. KOLODZI (CAL. BAR NO. 255772)433 North Camden Drive, Suite 600Beverly Hills, California 90210Telephone: 310.279.5212Facsimile: 866.571.6094Email: mdk@mdklawfirm.com
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Can you say controlled opposition?
Born of two Jews.
Betcha Bar member Larry won't advocate for being a Free Inhabitant of Nevada and NOT a US Citizen.
LARRY KLAYMAN (D.C. BAR NO. 334581)FREEDOM WATCH, INC.2020 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 345Washington, DC 20006Telephone: 561.558.5536Email:
leklayman@gmail.comPro Hac Vice to be FiledMICHAEL D. KOLODZI (CAL. BAR NO. 255772)433 North Camden Drive, Suite 600Beverly Hills, California 90210Telephone: 310.279.5212Facsimile: 866.571.6094Email:
mdk@mdklawfirm.com
I am aware of that!
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Ernie has a five part series on the Bundys and what they're fighting against that's pretty interesting. Parts 1 and 2 he's getting warmed up to the subject explaining words. In 3 and 4 he talks about the Bundys and others who have run in to trouble with the government. I'll post the 3 and 4 videos here but if you have the time It's interesting and entertaining to start at the beginning and work you way through.
part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZqGGAD1mWI
part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzrf0EbZGGI
part 5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opLBen_50Io
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Dr. Angus McIntosh has a bit of encouraging news:
https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...16&oe=5AFB225D
Angus McIntosh
6 hrs ·
Here’s some encouraging news. Apparently 10 out of 12 members of the National Park Advisory Council have resigned. Time to get rid of the socialist in the government anyway.
Now if we can get 90% of the career NPS, BLM, and USFS bureaucrats to retire, resign, or transfer to the Postal Service or Border Patrol things will be getting better.
Constitutionally National Parks were originally established for military and national mineral security purposes. (See US v Gratiot, 1840, and Gettysburg Elec RR Co v US, 1877).
The military was in charge of national parks prior to the National Park Service Act of 1916 and establishment of a National Park did not affect prior existing range rights (Curtin v Benson, 1911).
The original NPS Act was the first true multiple use Act as it allowed for hunting, fishing, grazing and logging in national parks. Time to get an advisory council that believes in actual management rather than letting Parks decay and deteriorate due to neglect.
34 Likes3 Comments16 Shares
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Final four Bundy Ranch defendants file motion to dismiss superceding indictment for outrageous goverment conduct and destruction of evidence
28 pages:
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...todismiss.html
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
The corrupt DOJ spent an estimated 1/4 of one billion dollars on the Bundy trials only to end up with egg on their face. This is an updated article origially published at LewRockwell.com
Nevada Bundy Prosecution Collapses
HERE, IN THE BIGGEST CASE IN THE COUNTRY, WITH THE PROSECUTION SPENDING UNTOLD MILLIONS OF DOLLARS AND THE JUDGE IMPOSING RULES OF EVIDENCE WHICH ALMOST CHOKED THE DEFENSE FROM SPEAKING, THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WAS UNABLE TO GET CONVICTIONS.
January 15, 2018 BLM, Constitution, FBI, Featured, Federal Courts 4
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...-9-678x381.jpg
Roger Roots shares his photo, taken January 9th. The Cliven Bundy defense team included attorneys Bret Whipple and Larry Klayman.
Nevada Bundy Prosecution Collapses
The Federal Government Spent a Quarter-Billion Dollars but
Couldn’t Convict the Bundys of a Single Crime
By Roger I. Roots, J.D., Ph.D.
January 12, 2018
In 2013 the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) obtained federal court orders authorizing the agency to “seize and remove to impound” hundreds of Cliven Bundy’s cattle on the public ranges around Bunkerville, Nevada. The agency interpreted these court orders broadly, and descended on the area in April 2014 with some 200 body-armor-wearing agents, semiautomatic weapons, sniper teams, undercover informants, and surveillance cameras aimed at the Bundy residence.
The BLM brought more than corrals and horse trailers. They brought backhoes, dump trucks and earth-moving equipment to tear up water lines and other infrastructure that had been built by Bundy and his ancestors over decades. Defying county officials, the federal officers chose calving season—the very time when cows and newborn calves are most physically weak and vulnerable—to execute the court orders. They orchestrated a paramilitarized roundup operation using helicopters to terrify the cattle into stampeding to the point of exhaustion in extreme heat. At least 40 cows either died from the ordeal or were shot by BLM employees and contractors.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...-2-150x150.jpg
The Feds even used the impoundment order to establish “First Amendment Zones” limiting freedom of speech in a 600,000-acre area to two small isolated parcels in the desert. It was almost certainly the largest infringement of First Amendment rights (by area) in American history.
When Bundy’s son Dave stopped on a state highway to photograph BLM snipers on local hillsides, BLM agents threw him down, ground his face into asphalt and falsely arrested him. And when other family members stopped a BLM dump truck to inquire if the truck was carrying dead cows, BLM agents erupted in a flurry of violence.
In response, hundreds of citizens journeyed from all over the country to protest the BLM operation. A few were armed. Political officials from across the west denounced the BLM’s heavy-handedness. As a direct result of the national outcry, the BLM halted their cattle impoundment. And on April 12, 2014, the BLM agents withdrew from the area—seemingly at the direction of the U.S. Attorneys office. It was apparently the plan of the Justice Department to entrap the Bundys into a criminal case by constructing a narrative that Bundy supporters “extorted” the cattle from the BLM by threats and “assaults” on federal officers. (The corralled cattle would have died had not Bundy family members released them back onto the range.)
Federal prosecutors spent tens of millions to build an elaborate criminal case designed to imprison Bundy and his sons and supporters for life. For two years, more than a thousand FBI agents combed through Facebook comments, posed as supporters or journalists, or surfed the internet to concoct a case against the
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...LM-150x150.jpg
Meanwhile Bundy’s sons Ammon and Ryan became active in protests against the government’s mistreatment of the Hammond family in eastern Oregon. In January 2016 protesters occupied Oregon’s Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in a month-long demonstration.
Again the FBI spent millions in a show of force against the “domestic terrorists.” The entire town of Burns, Oregon—30 miles from the Refuge occupation—was fortified with razor wire, chain-link fences and concrete barriers. Military hardware rolled through the streets and buzzed overhead. Undercover informants dressed as rednecks in pickups harassed the populace. At a January 26, 2016 roadblock ambush, FBI and Oregon State Police opened fire on Ryan Bundy and shot 54-year-old LaVoy Finicum in the back as he stood surrounded in a roadside snowbank.
Leftist or socialist demonstrators would likely have been charged with misdemeanors over the Refuge occupation; but government officials viewed the 2016 “armed takeover” as an affront to all that government stands for. Federal prosecutors alleged that the protesters had launched a conspiracy to impede federal officials from performing their jobs.
The Most Elaborate Prosecutions In American History
In their zeal to destroy the Bundy “movement,” teams of federal prosecutors launched the most elaborate federal criminal cases in American history. Ammon and Ryan Bundy, militia spokesman Ryan Payne, and others were flown back-and-forth between Oregon and Nevada to face hearings in two, simultaneous criminal cases. Jurors in both jurisdictions were bussed (supposedly for their safety) from secret locations every day. In Nevada, not one but two helicopters followed overhead while defendants were transported between prison and court daily. In all, the federal government has likely spent a quarter of a billion dollars reacting to, imprisoning, and prosecuting the Bundys and their fellow protesters.
In October 2016, jurors in Portland acquitted the Oregon defendants in the “trial of the century.” U.S. marshals tackled and tased Ammon Bundy’s attorney in the courtroom. Ammon and Ryan Bundy were denied release and transported to a Nevada prison to face the Nevada indictment along with Cliven, brothers Dave and Mel and a dozen others (while a half-dozen others awaited a second trial in Oregon).
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...l1-150x150.jpg
Todd Engel
The Oregon ‘not-guilty’ verdicts gave hope to two-dozen other defendants, who mostly stuck to their guns (no pun intended) and refused to plead guilty or negotiate with prosecutors. Courts were forced to split the Oregon case into 2 trial groups and the Nevada case into 3 trial groups. The first Nevada trial (of “gunmen”), commenced in February 2017 with Eric Parker, Scott Drexler, Greg Burleson, Steve Stewart, Todd Engel and Rick Lovelien facing multiple serious charges. Jurors couldn’t agree on most counts but convicted Engel and Burleson (mostly based on Facebook comments) of some accusations. Burleson was sentenced to 68 years in prison.
Then came one of the most disgraceful “trials” in U.S. history. Parker, Drexler, Stewart and Lovelien were retried in Las Vegas in August 2017. The prosecution exploited every possible advantage, winning rulings from the judge which barred the defendants from even mentioning most of their possible defenses. (They couldn’t even say that the BLM was overbearing or heavily armed, or even that there were government snipers above them.) Jurors were treated to a one-sided display of 2014 photos showing the men with guns while overlooking BLM officers from a bridge on Interstate 15. BLM witnesses—either exaggerating or lying—cried in the courtroom while claiming they saw the defendants pointing rifles at them. (Not a single photo or video corroborates this—and there were hundreds of cameras recording almost everything at the time; there were even Nevada trooper dashcams capturing 80 percent of the movements of the defendants during the period.)
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u.../08/parker.jpg
The judge even ordered Eric Parker off the witness stand for saying he looked “up and to the right” during the 2014 “standoff.” Prosecutors strenuously objected (in a sidebar hearing) that such a statement might tell jurors that there were BLM snipers on a mesa above; and thus Parker was unable to rebut the government’s claim that he aimed his rifle down-and-to-the-left at a crying BLM agent (who was photographed very-much-not-crying at the time).
Defense lawyers were so stifled by the judge’s orders that they opted not to even make closing arguments—a gutsy move almost without precedent. It was a cry for help to the jury. And the jury heard it loud and clear. On August 22, 2017, the jury fully acquitted Stewart and Lovelien, and acquitted Parker and Drexler of most counts. (They hung on a small number of charges for the two men.)
The not-guilty verdicts sent shockwaves throughout the Judiciary and the Justice Department. Here, in the biggest case in the country, with the prosecution spending untold millions of dollars and the judge imposing rules of evidence which almost choked the defense from speaking, the Justice Department was unable to get convictions.
When the “big trial” (involving Cliven, Ryan, Ammon, and Ryan Payne) began in October 2017, defense attorneys demanded to see evidence that had been withheld by the prosecution. There were pictures (but no explanations) of immense piles of shredded documents left by the BLM at the scene in 2014. And Ryan Bundy remembered surveillance cameras pointed at the Bundy house in 2014 yet Bundy had never been provided with the footage.
Prosecutors insisted they possessed no such evidence. Even if there was a surveillance camera here or there it hadn’t recorded anything. But such questions seemed to produce more startling disclosures. Ultimately it was revealed that there had been an elaborate FBI surveillance operation which had been concealed from the defense. And it seemed that prosecutors had been coaching witnesses to change their reports to censor out inconvenient facts.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...ro-150x150.jpg
By the third week of trial in November, Chief Judge Gloria Navarro—the very judge who had given prosecutors everything they wished for in the previous two trials—was visibly weary of the DOJ’s barbarous tactics. A mistrial was declared just prior to Christmas, and all defendants except Cliven were released on conditions while lawyers argued over whether the case warranted another trial. And on Monday, January 8, 2018, in a packed courtroom in Las Vegas, the Judge granted Ryan Payne’s motion to dismiss. A “universal sense of justice has been violated,” proclaimed Navarro. The judge said further that she was unaware of a more egregious case of FBI misconduct.
It should be noted that there are currently a half-dozen additional pending motions to dismiss, citing even graver prosecutorial misconduct. It has recently come to light that lead prosecutor Steven Myhre was approached during the first Nevada trial by a government case investigator who informed the prosecutor that he was breaking the law by withholding evidence from the defense. Myhre’s response, according to some reports, was to fire the agent and order him to keep quiet. Even as Cliven Bundy was released from jail after serving 700 days, the case continues for others. Stay tuned!
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...ly-678x381.jpgCliven Bundy Family (photo credit: Morgan Philpot)
Dr. Roger Roots is an attorney for Cliven Bundy in two pending civil cases and has worked on both the Ryan Bundy defense team in Oregon and the Cliven Bundy defense team in Nevada. Roger is the only lawyer who observed all four Bundy trials beginning in October 2016. (He missed seeing only the second Oregon trial in February 2017 because it conflicted with the first Nevada trial.) Roger is also a founder of Lysander Spooner University, and author of The Conviction Factory: The Collapse of America’s Criminal Courts.
This is an updated article that was first published at LewRockwell.com
Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews
