Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
Dear Dr. Trowbridge…..
Posted on January 18, 2017by David Robinson
https://mainerepublicemailalert.file...anna.png?w=640
Judge Anna von Reitz
Dear Dr. Trowbridge…..
The Final Straw from Dr. John Parks Trowbridge: https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com
I want all of my readers to read this updated posting from Dr. Trowbridge. For the past three years, he has been dueling with the so-called “federal courts” which are indeed nothing more than corporate municipal courts and are not vested with any authority related to us, our states, or our judicial powers.
Dr. Trowbridge has exposed the seedy underbelly of the “UNITED STATES” incorporated, which is nothing but a private, for-profit, mostly foreign-owned governmental services corporation operated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on our shores, and he has also exposed the treasonous “Oath Tampering” of its Board of Directors, masquerading as members of a legitimate and lawfully organized “Congress” in 1991.
Indeed, John Parks Trowbridge has fought the good fight.
The one aspect of this circumstance which he has not taken into consideration is that all their actions against him and against other Americans depend upon falsification of public records (Birth Certificates) enabling these Grifters to “presume” that we are all “voluntarily submitting” to their municipal jurisdiction and that we are not owed the guarantees of the actual Constitution as a result.
We are not now and the vast majority of us have never been either “United States Citizens” (Territorial Citizens) nor “citizens of the United States” (Municipal CITIZENS)—but our names have been “registered” as such and we have been falsely held under the legal presumptions that apply in that foreign international jurisdiction as a result.
Unable to change or overcome our actual Constitution, the treasonous corporate vermin have instead connived to mischaracterize each one of us and to falsely claim that we have knowingly and willingly volunteered to serve as “citizens” in their “democracy” instead of living as non-citizen American state nationals in the republic we are owed.
And that fundamental fraud is what underlies all that Dr. Trowbridge and many other honest Americans have detected and experienced. These dishonest “courts” are not offering to try John Parks Trowbridge, but a corporate franchise ACCOUNT named after him: JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE or a bankrupt public utility franchise ACCOUNT also named after him: JOHN P. TROWBRIDGE by the perpetrators of this vast, convoluted scheme.
Congressional Record: June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646—— “A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT (Public Charitable Trust set up for the welfare of freed plantation slaves in the wake of the Civil War), the private constructive, cestui que vie trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.
There— once and for all — in plain English— is what a “citizen of the United States” is: a dead legal fiction entity presumed to be operating as a recipient of federal corporation welfare benefits in exchange for guaranteeing (underwriting and acting as a surety for) the debts of both the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc.
There, too, is the explanation of how you are being enslaved and “presumed upon” by these vermin. As a “citizen of the United States” you are on the hook for paying their debts and presumed to be operating a public trust franchise, a Cestui Que Vie constructive trust named after you under the JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE ACCOUNT or to be a bankrupt public transmitting utility franchise operating under the JOHN P. TROWBRIDGE ACCOUNT.
These criminals are getting away with these frauds and deceits and operating these “courts” as private debt collection agencies in behalf of the creditors of “JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE” (benefiting the US, Inc.) and “JOHN P.TROWBRIDGE” (which isn’t even a legal name for lack of specificity, benefiting the USA, Inc.) under color of law.
This has been going on for 150 years, ever since the close of the so-called “American Civil War” which was never declared and which was never ended by any peace treaty and which is, therefore, nothing but an illegal and illicit commercial mercenary action on our shores.
They have usurped upon our rightful jurisdiction—-the land and the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction, too—and promoted global enslavement and false indebtedness–via the pernicious practice of registering people as “things”—- Cestui Que Vie trusts and bankrupt public transmitting utility franchises—without the victim’s knowledge or consent. They seize upon us when we are babies in our cradles, force our Mothers to sign undisclosed contracts, and register our given names as franchises of corporations indebted to them.
And, because there is no law against enslaving a corporate fiction or robbing a corporate fiction or falsely arresting a corporate fiction, they have made very merry on our shores, operating this con game and substituting their private corporation for the public government we are owed.
Doctor Trowbridge, you are wasting your time making arguments “in Law” against vermin operating “at law”. In their fraudulent system of things, JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE has already consented to their municipal jurisdiction and submitted his body, soul, and any other assets he may have or earn to serve their benefit and not his own. In their fraudulent system of things, JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE has owed an insurmountable debt from the day of his birth—which is not the day you were born, but the date your given name was registered (filed) as property belonging to them and offered for the benefit of their creditors. In their fraudulent, foreign system of things, JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE is — by definition — a criminal, already convicted, and all that is left for them to discuss is how much he owes their masters and how long they may put him in jail.
And now, without further adieu, may we all agree that the Pope and the British Monarch and the Lord Mayor of London, all of whom have acted in Gross International Breach of Trust with respect to the America people since 1822, are to be recognized as criminals for creating and promoting and using and abusing this system of fraud and mischaracterization and operating it throughout the world? That they are to be universally condemned for the practice of preying upon helpless babies and alleging false and self-interested contracts against them and their parents?
Yes.
Dear Doctor Trowbridge, I could weep for the beauty of your logic and your research, because except for the erudition of the ignorant concerning what should be honored by any honest court— I know it is beyond hope to expect these private bill collection agencies being run as courts under color of law to respond to your complaint.
Even among the Bar Association Members bright enough to understand what you are saying, there isn’t the courage or the honor or the strength of character necessary for these men and women to denounce what has gone on here. To do so would be to admit their own guilt and without the power to guarantee their safety, you cannot expect them to yield. At most, you may expect a private settlement and the dismissal of any charges held against you, the return of your house, and a quick sideways scuttle like cockroaches fleeing the light.
And that, I think, is not your object, Sir. I think that you, like me, are determined to see the correction of this entire system of things and that nothing but an end to business as usual for these con artists will do.
Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
We can see clearly now the price of being a US Citizen
bigjon
BarnacleBob,Yesterday at 5:47 PM
Over there:
LMAO.... "Traffic Court"!
What is TRAFFIC?
Commerce; trade; dealings in merchandise, bills, money, and the like. See Iu re Insurance Co. (D. C.) 96 Fed. 757; Levine v. State, 35 Tex. Cr. R. 647. 34 S. W. 960; Feople v. Hamilton, 17 Misc. Rep. 11, 39 N. Y. Supp. 531; Merriam v. Langdon, 10 Conn. 471. (Blacks Law Dictionary)
http://thelawdictionary.org/traffic/
From the article:
"I asked her whether this was a criminal action or a civil action. She replied, “It’s hard to explain it in those terms.” I asked whether she intended to proceed under criminal procedural rules or in civil procedure. We would proceed under the “rules of criminal procedure,” she answered because this is a criminal case. I asked when I could expect to be charged, indicted, or have a probable cause determination. She replied that none of those events would occur because this is “a civil action.” So I could expect to be served with a complaint? No, no. As she had already explained, we would proceed under the criminal rules.
In short, municipal officials and their private contractors have at their disposal the powers of both criminal and civil law and are excused from the due process duties of both criminal and civil law. "
She replied, “It’s hard to explain it in those terms.”
"TRAFFIC COURT IS A PRIVATE CIVIL COMMERCIAL COURT!" Traffic is commerce!
This was an ad hoc summary proceeding in the PRIVATE "civil" jurisdiction of law merchant (lex merchatoria). “It’s hard to explain it in those terms.” Damn right it is, cause once you understand "law merchant" you can defend yourself.
Law Merchant is a private civil equity proceeding. The civil law of equity does not include criminal penalties, law merchant does! Thats the tip-off, when they say its a "civil proceeding that carries criminal penalties" you automatically KNOW your in a private law merchant ad hoc summary proceeding. Secondly, law merchant operates outside of the constitutions & constitutional protections, hence "due process" doesnt apply in law merchant! Most traffic laws & courts lack due process in toto.Thats the second indicator that your not in a judicial power court, but a private civil action. Thirdly these are not judicial criminal proceedings as there is never a court reporter on the record... same as any civil proceeding! Fourthly, in a judicial criminal proceeding the state must prove your guilty of a crime, in law merchant the defendant is presumed to be in dishonor (guilty) and must prove being innocent of dishonor.
These private civil courts blend & bend the rules of both civil & criminal procedure to keep the law merchant hidden from view. In most jurisdictions these private commercial proceedings use "Roberts Rules of Order" to conduct the fleecing.
In U.S. polity & law, law merchant has two names, 1. Public Policy & 2. The Uniform Commercial Code.
Below is a wonderful primer that explains the scam...
"The Dispatch of Merchants"
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Articles/DispatchOfMerchants.htm#INTRODUCTION
==================
Take for instance "roadside confiscations" of cash & other goods... a complete lack of due process and its all committed under the civil law of law merchant. Your trafficking in traffic in a commercial vehicle, only commercial vehicles require a state title, registration & tags, your also carrying a commercial driver license (all dl's are various classes of commercial operators license) when your instantly detained and when the officer discovers $5000 in cash on the front seat he confiscates it as a civil forfeiture from your commercial vehicle. He created an instant "private" civil claim on the cash... If you want it back you must sue his CLAIM in his private civil court using his rules. Good luck! Its all perpetuated using law merchant.... Almost ALL state & federal statutes are commercial... and their scope has been traditionally been aimed at regulating a special & specific, not general class of commercial subjects, objects or activities... However, using law merchant the legislatures & their agents have been able to expand their reach into all areas of activities. All they need do is create a private civil case against the victim in commerce.... and the word TRAFFIC is key.
What is TRAFFIC?
Commerce; trade; dealings in
merchandise, bills, money, and the like.
Do deal in merchandise, bills, money & the like? Of course you do... you buy groceries, gasoline, electricity, & clothing, etc. (dealing in merchandise) and you pay for these items with bills (debt) or money (coins) and the like (bank accounts, checks, money orders, credit cards, credit, etc.). In the perverted eyes of the law,
YOU ARE A MERCHANT! And merchants & their activities are the object & subject of civil commerce and the private civil jurisdiction of law merchant. And BTW, thats exactly what the yellow fringed flag represents, law merchant!
“We may have democracy or we may have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” –Louis Brandeis, Former Supreme Court Justice
"Sovereignty is an entire thing — to divide, is — to destroy it." --John C. Calhoun
BarnacleBob, Yesterday at 11:11 PM
Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
When you read our local Traffic Laws and the Traffic Code, it has a definition of Traffic. The movement of goods or persons for a fee. Doesn't get more plain than that.
I'm sure I've got a book on Lex Mercatoria somewhere... can't seem to put my hands on it. Will look for it tomorrow at my workplace. The Practice and Jurisdiction of the Court of Admiralty is also a good read.
Google has a book called "Consuentudo vel Lex Mercatoria" or the Ancient Law Merchant divided in to 3 parts according to the Essential Parts of Traffick. Necessary for all Statesmen, Judges and Magistrates.
Free Trade agreements like NAFTA are extensions of the concept of Staples or designated ports where by the Law of Merchants applies and particular codification applies. They might use an existing codification as a template such as UNIDROIT or Roman Canonical rules.
Somewhere on here is the post about the Highway and how certain centres or depots are setup. I can't find the post but it should be read in conjunction with this information as they are these Staple ports....inland but connected by highways - inland water ways.
Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ares
Agreed, no one has the stomach for Revolution. Even if there were one, the sheep are so mindlessly stupid that we would end up with a pure Democracy instead of Republic.
They aren't sheep. They are asleep and dreaming. Nobody wants to awaken a deep dreamer or a sleep walker. They tend to do violent things because they think they are still in the dream. Then you face the problem of those who are half awake. They make irrational decisions because they don't completely have a grasp on reality.
For perspective it would appear that the libs and democrats are in rem sleep mode. The republicans are in half awake mode and know something is wrong but still believe they can be half awake and can make a difference to the world of the ones still sleeping.
If you are fully awake you agree with everyone and survive.
If the deep sleepers cannot exist without Obamacare maybe it would be best to keep it just for them. This could be used to identify those who believe in insurance and those who are responsible.
Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
Quote:
Congressional Record: June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646—— “A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT (Public Charitable Trust set up for the welfare of freed plantation slaves in the wake of the Civil War), the private constructive, cestui que vie trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.
Quoted for substance...
Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ares
Quoted for substance...
whats the substance?
Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
That quoted statement may be true and is a result of the 14th amendment, but does not appear anywhere in the constutionality of the 14th amendment argument in the Congressional Record pages 15641 - 15646 of June 13, 1967.
http://www.14th-amendment.com/Histor..._Amendment.pdf
I have also found "quoted" US Supreme Court decisons on the internet turn out to be false when you read the actual decisions.
Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
Quote:
Originally Posted by
monty
That quoted statement may be true and is a result of the 14th amendment, but does not appear anywhere in the constutionality of the 14th amendment argument in the Congressional Record pages 15641 - 15646 of June 13, 1967.
http://www.14th-amendment.com/Histor..._Amendment.pdf
I have also found "quoted" US Supreme Court decisons on the internet turn out to be false when you read the actual decisions.
Did you read through the full document? Searching for keywords doesn't work with scanned documents. Try it for yourself, I've tried on 2 different platforms with 4 different PDF readers and I can't even search for words that are clearly in the document. Amendment, record, etc. If I get the time this weekend I'll try to read through the full document and see if that quote is in there.
Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ares
Did you read through the full document? Searching for keywords doesn't work with scanned documents. Try it for yourself, I've tried on 2 different platforms with 4 different PDF readers and I can't even search for words that are clearly in the document. Amendment, record, etc. If I get the time this weekend I'll try to read through the full document and see if that quote is in there.
Yes. I reread it again this morning to see if I had missed it. There is a better copy here
http://www.rayservers.com/images/Con...er_7_pages.pdf
