new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

It's not that at all. It really boils down to the obvious of what I have already stated.

If you think it's easier to mind control the whole world with a grand scheme of make believe photo shopped fairy tale people v.s. a few agents, in and out the back door with a van, then there's really nothing else to be said that will instill common sense.

It's a really valid question, and if you don't see that for what it is at face value, something else is going on, and it's not related to common sense.

No one here has been man enough to admit that, and that speaks for itself.

I make people think...I ask questions...I'm the "bad guy". Burn the witch! ;)

---

And I've already pointed you to the site that will make all the above happen under the cover of darkness.

Nothing escapes once the matter becomes of "National Security".

You also have the escaped terrorist being sought after in some of the early clips on the scene... being named as a "second shooter".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

And I've already pointed you to the site that will make all the above happen under the cover of darkness.

Nothing escapes once the matter becomes of "National Security".

You also have the escaped terrorist being sought after in some of the early clips on the scene... being named as a "second shooter".

---

I'm a little hesitant to click on links after the DHS one and the ZCF ones. Fortunately for DHS, I have a referral blocker so they won't know my IP linked in from this thread. ;)

Aside from everything, while everyone is here debating the grassy knoll (aka the new pentagon missile conundrum), there's a gun control agenda about to be written into law.

Seriously though...I think they used Adobe PDF Pro v9 to manipulate the fake pics of the girl with the president. If they used Photoshop it would be more obvious to spot the layers, and pixelation.

$1,000 to turn in your neighbor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=S_rY8ZUbrnU

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

Aside from everything, while everyone is here debating the grassy knoll (aka the new pentagon missile conundrum), there's a gun control agenda about to be written into law.

---

I actually view the possibility of this being fake, and that conclusion being arrived at by a lot of people to be bigger than the gun debate. Here's why. In other threads, I've brought up the idea that we are quickly moving to a situation where we have to choose the lesser of two evils. This is what's always done...they get us to accept doing something bad to ourselves by giving us the option between bad and worse.

The possibility that the gun issue could be eclipsed by the mass realization of a fake event transcends the plans of the armed civil war within the country. It's called the population waking up and saying enough: no more fake wars, no more fake laws, no more fake money, no more fake science, no more fake religion. It is not acceptable for me to submit to you, it is not acceptable for me to fight you, it is not acceptable for me to comply with you. I won't believe you, I won't fear you.

That's where the real change in the future will come from.

The fact that they either can't, or refuse, to publish the evidence for the tragedy that will give them their gun control makes no sense. I won't comply with them any longer. I won't believe anything. If they choose to provide evidence then I will accept it and accept whatever the evidence suggests. However, if they choose not to provide evidence, I will not believe them. It's their choice. I can't see why they wouldn't want to, but I'm not going to voluntarily twist my own perception of truth for them any more. I'm not bigoted, rather their AAA credit rating as far as believability has dropped so far over the last few years that I'm forced to take this position till they can show me the money. Stop telling me they're good for it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

Aside from everything, while everyone is here debating the grassy knoll (aka the new pentagon missile conundrum), there's a gun control agenda about to be written into law.

---

Quote:

---

Second shooter arrested near Sandy Hook elementary school

Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...#ixzz2HGW59zNQ

---

Let us revisit the beginning of the thread & get back on track, with the second "terrorist" escaping.

This goes for 24 minutes. It covers 2 interviews with Parent couples who lost a child. I made an immediate observation about mother #2. Couple #1 are of the same thread but I don't think it's so obvious. IMO their origins are from a different part of the world than Mother #2.

Watch all of it if you wish, otherwise forward to minute 19 and listen to something else the guy has dug up on the Dispatch audio. The cops know the name of the shooter before they have even entered the building. They have just arrived on scene and they know the shooters name. There is something else there he points out.

I have not heard this before. I will have to go back to the stuff I have and listen some more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X1jg0H-MfVY

I'm actually listening to my copy of the Dispatch. The person who called in the shooting to police was a male. I thought it was a teacher at the school and I thought there were only women teachers at the school.

Ok so on my copy of the dispatch at 22:57 you can just hear it being said. There is a lot of noise many times over the top of people speaking.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

^ I don't know TT- this being a psyop, and that being yet another big clue, I don't expect to find any ZSM sources reporting on "all closed caskets". It would only be alt media which would report, and if we imagine it's a psyop again, there would be no real public memorials in most cases to investigate.

Don't know much about this "Morris" guy- Rense & WRH seem to like linking to his vids, but I know nothing of why we should be listening to him- most of his ~5 min spiels I've watched are just moderately insightful. Anyway this one's interesting, reminds me of Rivero's old essay, The Point Of No Return (about "humiliating us" with in-our-face lies and thus making us more malleable as we fear looking in the mirror at what we've become, are self-loathing at a subconsious level, outside we become the LIARS' greatest supporters-- stockholm syndrome stuff):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj8HrS2aoGc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj8HrS2aoGc

---

We are required to admire the king's new clothes...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

If you're going to pull something like that off, why bother to fake anything, and hope it sticks across hundreds, or more, people?

It's not only impossible to do, it's crazy to even try, and think you can.

Why not just actually do it, and deal with maybe a dozen people?

All this talk about actors, kids being alive, and the entire family, friends, relatives all needing to be in on it...it's so far out there it simply fell off the edge into the abyss.

---

Because actually killing people is murder. You can fake a lot of things (i.e., birth certificates), and no one cares. People care when you actually kill someone. At that point, we are no longer talking about actors, but rather murderers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

Why has no one has admitted that mind controlling an entire town for life, and the entire world, in a grand scheme of make believe deception is in itself an insane notion over taking the far easier route of deploying a few guys to do some wet work?

Must to be too crazy to think about. ;)

---

Why do you keep saying for life? They only have to get away with it (whatever "it" is) for long enough to accomplish their goals- especially if something bigger and more distracting is coming up...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vacuum

The possibility that the gun issue could be eclipsed by the mass realization of a fake event transcends the plans of the armed civil war within the country.

---

that's the driving force behind 9/11 Truth, which some try to argue is spilt milk and we should move on,
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/185/4...eec0d11ab9.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vMQfeVSYbq...ruth4peace.jpg

...exposing the 9/11 Zi-op ends the fraudulent pretext for war, ends the fraudulent pretext for the Constitution-eviscerating police state rollout domestically.

Not only that, but they try to keep the public on edge today by hoaxing up new fake terror attacks- usually busted at the last second by our diligent & heroic alphabet spook agencies (who also orchestrated the "plots" top to bottom...),

"How To Foil Your Own Terror Plot"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6LGZtjpdJg

"Fake Al Qaeda Actors EXPOSED! Adam Gadahn & Yousef al Khatta" [AKA Adam Pearlman & Joseph Cohen]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCKsYHoOlt8

Sandy Hook and the other black Zi-Ops preceding it like Batman and the Sikh Temple events are, like 9/11, the fraudulent pretexts for ramming through the pre-existing agenda of disarming Americans, in preparation for their genocide at the hands of the same black Zi-Op perpetrators-- same joosh-bolshevik/communist crew who did the same thing to Russia after 1917, prompting Pravda to warn Americans recently, Never Give Up Your Guns. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vacuum

I actually view the possibility of this being fake, and that conclusion being arrived at by a lot of people to be bigger than the gun debate. Here's why. In other threads, I've brought up the idea that we are quickly moving to a situation where we have to choose the lesser of two evils. This is what's always done...they get us to accept doing something bad to ourselves by giving us the option between bad and worse. The possibility that the gun issue could be eclipsed by the mass realization of a fake event transcends the plans of the armed civil war within the country. It's called the population waking up and saying enough: no more fake wars, no more fake laws, no more fake money, no more fake science, no more fake religion. It is not acceptable for me to submit to you, it is not acceptable for me to fight you, it is not acceptable for me to comply with you. I won't believe you, I won't fear you. That's where the real change in the future will come from. The fact that they either can't, or refuse, to publish the evidence for the tragedy that will give them their gun control makes no sense. I won't comply with them any longer. I won't believe anything. If they choose to provide evidence then I will accept it and accept whatever the evidence suggests. However, if they choose not to provide evidence, I will not believe them. It's their choice. I can't see why they wouldn't want to, but I'm not going to voluntarily twist my own perception of truth for them any more. I'm not bigoted, rather their AAA credit rating as far as believability has dropped so far over the last few years that I'm forced to take this position till they can show me the money. Stop telling me they're good for it.

---

Yes, the plan is to consolidate control over everything as easily as possible. You still have to keep a head level head over it, or at least outwardly be an ambassador for others, and keep away from the fringe associations at every opportunity.

You could spend days debating whether or not they photoshopped make believe people, and pictures of dead people with the president, over other more credible realities, and totally undermine your efforts to anyone that reads it, and thinks you're on to something.

Why drive people away by going straight to crazyville, and dance around that fire, when it ultimately doesn't help anything? The pentagon thing is the same deal. Any solid evidence for a missile? NO....none...zero. Any solid evidence for a plane? YES all kinds, but they didn't release other camera footage, and some windows didn't break, so it was 100% a missile. (facepalm).

This is where people get driven away, and the situation totally undermines itself as looney toons. Same deal with hate based sites. They might have good accurate info also, but people look at that, and roll their eyes as well. It's like shooting yourself in the foot....both feet perhaps.

I'd go so far to say whoever made that president dead girl youtube video is cointel. Total disinfo scenario there. People look at that, roll their eyes and think "Oh boy...yeap.... the conspiracy nuts are at it again."

At a certain point you have to ask yourself, "am I hurting the cause or helping it?"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnQPublic

Why do you keep saying for life? They only have to get away with it (whatever "it" is) for long enough to accomplish their goals- especially if something bigger and more distracting is coming up...

---

You somehow have to mind control people into thinking children that don't exist, somehow exist. As long as the people you're trying to fool are alive they have to be somehow mysteriously mind controlled.

Fake kids in schools, fake parents? How is that even possible? People are going to realize nobody is missing in the school, and what parents have which children. It's madness.

All the people that know this will talk about it throughout the town over the years, and cannot be silenced forever. At some point in the lives of 100's of people it's going to come out. Talk about loose ends!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EE_

$1,000 to turn in your neighbor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=S_rY8ZUbrnU

---

Did you get that from WRH?

Wondering why is says "Uploaded on Jan 15, 2012 by GunOwnersofAmerica"
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.co...ighbors/30352/

Is that from a year ago, or recent?... I dunno. youtube says uploaded recently.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

Let us revisit the beginning of the thread & get back on track, with the second "terrorist" escaping.

---

It's a question for sure. It was supposed to be the janitor initially, does anyone know who it is ultimately? Nopes.

Was the guy in the school, did he hear shots, and see bullets flying out some windows, and freaked out thinking he was going to get shot? Was he initially inside the school or walking outside? Who knows?

If it was a person walking by the school would it make the media, and police look incompetent if they reported it differently as just someone going for a walk and freaked out after hearing guns blazing? Could be.

Did he get left behind from "the op"? ....but that would mean the kids probably got shot, and are not alive and faked. Hmm.

You're not going to be allowed to find out ultimately, but does that mean you should then entertain wildly fringe ideas like fake missing kids, and fake parents to fill in the puzzle pieces?

Not such a great idea really.

I remember the explanation of how the kids were reunited with their kids at the firehouse. The kids and the parents were kept separate and one by one, their identities were checked and the parents identities were checked and then the children were bought to the parents. Reasonable process I suppose. I wonder if all the kids were reunited? I suppose so. So many people around it would be hard to over look a child.

It was interesting on the police dispatch, very early on, like 10 or 15 minutes after the call there is a radio transmission instructing people to set up this actual thing. We will keep the kids and parents separate and we'll set it up at the firehouse.

I spent a bit of time looking at any aerial footage I could find of the events. 1 thing I did notice was that there was this yellow crime scene tape everywhere. There was tape all the way round the car and over to the wall by the building. From other angles the front entrance to the building was also taped off. There were many dozens of police standing around, some in groups, some in uniform, some not in uniform, some not cops but no uniform so don't know what.

I noticed that very few people crossed the crime scene tape and when they did to go into the building, it was only in pairs or three's and they all were escorted in and it seemed to be escorted back out again and always by someone who was already in there. You see, it's a crime scene and while there are hundreds of people milling about, only a very small number of those actually went into the building. The rest stayed outside. There are not many eye witnesses to the aftermath.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

Yes, the plan is to consolidate control over everything as easily as possible. You still have to keep a head level head over it, or at least outwardly be an ambassador for others, and keep away from the fringe associations at every opportunity.

You could spend days debating whether or not they photoshopped make believe people, and pictures of dead people with the president, over other more credible realities, and totally undermine your efforts to anyone that reads it, and thinks you're on to something.

Why drive people away by going straight to crazyville, and dance around that fire, when it ultimately doesn't help anything? The pentagon thing is the same deal. Any solid evidence for a missile? NO....none...zero. Any solid evidence for a plane? YES all kinds, but they didn't release other camera footage, and some windows didn't break, so it was 100% a missile. (facepalm).

This is where people get driven away, and the situation totally undermines itself as looney toons. Same deal with hate based sites. They might have good accurate info also, but people look at that, and roll their eyes as well. It's like shooting yourself in the foot....both feet perhaps.

I'd go so far to say whoever made that president dead girl youtube video is cointel. Total disinfo scenario there. People look at that, roll their eyes and think "Oh boy...yeap.... the conspiracy nuts are at it again."

At a certain point you have to ask yourself, "am I hurting the cause or helping it?"

---

I see your point of view, and it does seem reasonable. You're kind of advocating picking your battles. Hold back on one's true thoughts to skillfully interact with the public at large in order to steer the locomotive enough to avert disaster. Reason with the public, not shock them.

I am doing a writeup and hopefully will be able to share it with you in not too long. It's basically about what the real battle is. Is it to stop certain legislation? Is it to develop some collective, reasonable, view which can be a rallying point for all? Is it giving a new political alternative in a Ron Paul-esque way, and directing people towards that movement instead of the false movement they participate in? Is it to mortally wound the devil and/or defeat him on the great battlefield? I don't believe the battle revolves around those things.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

You somehow have to mind control people into thinking children that don't exist, somehow exist. As long as the people you're trying to fool are alive they have to be somehow mysteriously mind controlled.

Fake kids in schools, fake parents? How is that even possible? People are going to realize nobody is missing in the school, and what parents have which children. It's madness.

All the people that know this will talk about it throughout the town over the years, and cannot be silenced forever. At some point in the lives of 100's of people it's going to come out. Talk about loose ends!

---

How are 19 dead Arab hijackers possible? Some of whom are still alive? Why are they closing down the school?

Does anybody in Newtown know who Robbie Parker and Emilie Parker are? What about Adam Lanza? Did anybody know him? Are there any records of him? Are there any records of any of the 'dead' people?

What we are watching is a new kind of mind control. Media mind control. Media induced trauma by fake story. All that is necessary is for people to believe it for the instant they are told. That creates the emotional trauma. That trauma is not forgotten, even as the facts emerge, even when the whole thing is proven to be a fraud. It's like the people who bought Edsels. Nobody wants to admit they were duped. So they go on believing the fraudulent story. Their sense of identity depends on it.

Yes, you can have mass mind control. You are watching it here right in front of your eyes. Is there an agenda that it serves? It appears to be gun control. Combine that with fear, and you have a malleable population. The fear comes from reports of DHS buying billions of hollow point bullets. Nobody knows what for. Leave it to their imaginations. Then traumatize them. Make them believe a bunch of innocent kids were killed. Then they will give up their guns. There are a few billion bullets for anybody who resists. Do it. Give up those guns. It's the right thing to do. This is the message. Is it mind control? Looks like it to me.


Hatha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

You somehow have to mind control people into thinking children that don't exist, somehow exist. As long as the people you're trying to fool are alive they have to be somehow mysteriously mind controlled.

Fake kids in schools, fake parents? How is that even possible? People are going to realize nobody is missing in the school, and what parents have which children. It's madness.

All the people that know this will talk about it throughout the town over the years, and cannot be silenced forever. At some point in the lives of 100's of people it's going to come out. Talk about loose ends!

---

There is a lot of room between all kids and parents faked in a fake school to to some kids faked /actor parents in a real school, etc. We just do not know at this point. Maybe, exactly what was reported (with some sorting and explanations) is what happened, but at this point we do not know. If it is the case, then people were so freaked out that they made a lot of huge mistakes (and this is possible considering the horror of what is reported).

The real issue is that no one trusts the media (or many of the authorities). This is very unfortunate. Journalists should have been on this story likes ants on sugar, but instead they repeat spoon-fed soundbites.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hatha Sunahara

How are 19 dead Arab hijackers possible? Some of whom are still alive? Hatha

---

Because they're suspicious terrorist brown people living in a country that has no credibility in the conscious mind of the Western world. A Western town of white people has infinite more credibility, and voice by comparison.

Friends of the Lanza's have been interviewed. Did they fake the parents, and the places they worked, and all the employees there?
Is the brother fake as well, including his facebook page, and all the friends on it?

Is their house Photoshopped at that address? Is the address faked too? Nobody could just drive by, and look for themselves? Did they construct a fake house at a fake address just for this?

This event is not making people give up their guns, a few maybe....are they even giving them up, or is the media lying about that as well?

By and large it's making people buy more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

Because they're suspicious terrorist brown people living in a country that has no credibility in the conscious mind of the Western world. A Western town of white people has infinite more credibility, and voice by comparison.

---

Ok, explain this:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...efore-Shooting!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hatha Sunahara

. Is it mind control? Looks like it to me.

Hatha

---

for sure it's Mind Control, or attempted mind control.

one of the things i wonder is - i think the official story is, Lanza used a Bushmaster AR15.


so - where is the Class Action lawsuit ?

this reminds me a little of the tobacco company legal situation. obviously, you don't use a lit cigarette as a weapon of self-defense ... i'm sure it's been tried, but not with a high success rate :)

anyway, the big HUMONGOUS lawsuits filed against the tobacco companies didn't exactly shut them down, but it sure changed the playing field.


i think that may be the "other shoe dropping" that we will hear sometime in the next few months. some attorney (probably Jewish) will file a $25 Billion Personal Injury lawsuit, officially 'on behalf' of the Sandy Hook survivors.

but what they are really doing is trying to take guns away from Gentiles - to deny us the right to self-defense, while the Judeo-Fascist Police State tightens its grip on American life.

overall, i perceive that that is the game plan

Exhibit A -
Rahm Emanuel, "if you're on the No-Fly List, your Gun Rights are Cancelled."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjHjZFWh9ps

link to the same speech, but it's assoc. with Alex Jones -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJBZZKlvrP4


Exhibit B -
FeinWhine's Gun BS


Exhibit C -
Obama & Biden's Gun BS.


(possible) Exhibit D -
a class action lawsuit that would shut down some of the gun manufacturers.


it's obvious what the Agenda is.

if TPTB were genuinely concerned about stopping another Sandy Hook type shooting, they'd be talking about the drugs, mostly SSRI, that the shooters are taking.

how about holding responsible the "doctor" that prescribed the drugs that Adam Lanza was taking ? how about a Personal Injury class action naming the "doctors" and the Pharma companies that prescribed & made the drugs taken by the shooters ?

[i]haven't heard anything about that.[i/]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mamboni

Ok, explain this:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...efore-Shooting!

---

I can change the date on my computer, and make you think I sent you an email any day I want.

It ultimately proves not a lot, other than the server may have been off, or it incorporates the users local date, and time of the post.

There is no conclusion until more info is found out about the computer systems that host it. I would not call it the trump card, or any kind of definitive proof.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

I can change the date on my computer, and make you think I sent you an email any day I want.

It ultimately proves not a lot, other than the server may have been off, or it incorporates the users local date, and time of the post.

There is no conclusion until more info is found out about the computer systems that host it. I would not call it the trump card, or any kind of definitive proof.

---

Oh really. Then post a web page now and date it's creation to Dec. 1, 2012 to prove that you can do this simple task. Post a link to it here so that we may interrogate it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mamboni

Oh really. Then post a web page now and date it's creation to Dec. 1, 2012 to prove that you can do this simple task. Post a link to it here so that we may interrogate it.

---

Yeah really. Very simple. It's as easy as changing the date on the server that's hosting it.

Takes 5 seconds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

Yeah really. Very simple. It's as easy as changing the date on the server that's hosting it.

Takes 5 seconds.

---

Show us.

Sandy Hook Fire Dept. & DHS training program (2010):

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

http://www.ct.gov/demhs/ical/eventDe...CBCBCC83CDC9CC

Sep 22, 2010

Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation Program (HSEEP) - Newtown CT, 9/22, 9/29, & 10/6/2010 The HSEEP Training Course The HSEEP Training Course incorporates exercise guidance and best practices from the HSEEP Volumes. Throughout the course, participants will learn about exercise-related topics including program management, design and development, conduct, evaluation, and improvement planning. The HSEEP Training Course is an interactive course that allows participants to share personal lessons learned and best practices while gaining practical experience. In addition to the instructor-led course presentations, the course includes small group activities, videos, and group discussions. The course also provides overviews of HSEEP-related initiatives such as technology (e.g., the HSEEP Toolkit) and capabilities-based planning (e.g., Target Capabilities List [TCL]). This blended approach will give participants hands-on experience that readily translates to real-world exercise skills. Activities include creating exercise documentation, conducting exercise planning conferences and briefings, and practicing exercise evaluation. The course has been developed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) using input from Federal partners, subject matter experts (SMEs), and State and local representatives. HSEEP is a capabilities-based exercise program that includes a cycle, mix, and range of exercise activities of varying degrees of complexity and interaction. The purpose of HSEEP is to build self-sustaining exercise programs and provide a standardized methodology for designing, developing, conducting, and evaluating all exercises. Participant Preparation Participants need a basic knowledge of exercise design and HSEEP terminology. Therefore, participants are required to complete Independent Study (IS)-120.A, An Introduction to Exercises, before attending the HSEEP Training Course. The IS course takes approximately 3 to 5 hours to complete. To complete this requirement, follow these steps: Go to training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/IS120A.asp and select “Interactive Web-based Course”. After completing the modules, select “Take Final Exam”. Obtain proof of completion of the course. Additionally, the HSEEP Training Course will briefly cover other DHS initiatives. As such, it is recommended that participants complete the following IS courses: IS-130, Exercise Evaluation and Improvement Planning IS-139, Exercise Design IS-700, NIMS, An Introduction IS-800.B, National Response Framework, An Introduction The course will be held at the Sandy Hook Fire Department, address below. Location: 18 Riverside Road, Sandy Hook CT This event is 37 miles from you (06106). 8 AM - 5 PM

Contact: Tom Romano Email: thomas.romano@ct.gov Phone: 860 256 0844

19 of 30 seats still available

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mamboni

Show us.

---

I'll keep my production web servers on time thank you.

What I'm stating is 101 level fact. If you don't understand how web applications run, and don't want to verify this, that's your gig.

It's the same deal with your computer. All applications running on it go by the time, and date set on that operating system.

Water is wet, the sky is blue, web applications operate by the time set on the computer they run on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

I'll keep my production web servers on time thank you.

What I'm stating is 101 level fact. If you don't understand how web applications run, and don't want to verify this, that's your gig.

It's the same deal with your computer. All applications running on it go by the time, and date set on that operating system.

Water is wet, the sky is blue, web applications operate by the time set on the computer they run on.

---

And you're full of it. You'll need to do better than this tripe if you're going to get a bonus from the ADL/SPLC Disinfo Group.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mamboni

And you're full of it. You'll need to do better than this tripe if you're going to get a bonus from the ADL/SPLC Disinfo Group.

---

LOL. Ok then.... You must be drinking harder than usual tonight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

LOL. Ok then.... You must be drinking harder than usual tonight.

---

Hey JooBagel, quick! Call Larry Page and tell him you have to fix the clock on Google's server ASAP! LOL. What a moron.


Three Days Before Shooting “United Way Extends Our Most Sincere Condolences To Sandy Hook Families”

Breaking News | January 7, 2013 | 6 Comments

http://govtslaves.info/wp-content/up...3/01/JE48f.png

---

(Thomas Dishaw) More twists to the Sandy Hook narrative. On December 11 Google Indexed the United Way website that offered condolences to the family’s of Sandy Hook.
This is a full three days before the actual shooting that took place on December 14 2012. You can view the Google page here and the United Way page here.
Below is a excerpt from the December 11 united Way page. Don’t we all love a good conspiracy?

United Way extends our most sincere condolences and prayers to all those families affected by the devastating events in Newtown/Sandy Hook, Connecticut. While the eyes of the world may be on Newtown/Sandy Hook, to several staff, volunteers and contributors, Newtown is home. We will stand with the community and everyone affected directly and indirectly by this tragic event as we face the days and weeks ahead.
United Way of Western Connecticut is committed to providing support and resources where and when they become identified and needed. As people from our area and beyond respond to this heartbreaking tragedy, they are turning to United Way looking for ways to help. In response, United Way of Western Connecticut in partnership with Newtown Savings Bank has created the ‘Sandy Hook School Support Fund’ that will be able to provide support services to the families and community that has been affected.

http://govtslaves.info/three-days-be...hook-families/

And a passel more links to same.https://www.google.com/search?q=sand...w=1024&bih=456

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

Yeah really. Very simple. It's as easy as changing the date on the server that's hosting it.

Takes 5 seconds.

---

Only problem with that logic is that you can't do that on a production web hosting service. Especially one that has many hundreds or thousands of users. You'll run in to some major problems with database backups.

Interisting link, do not know if was posted. If repeat, apology in advance

http://crisisactors.org/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ares

Only problem with that logic is that you can't do that on a production web hosting service. Especially one that has many hundreds or thousands of users. You'll run in to some major problems with database backups.

---

No need for logic when Jooboo is the resident master of bluster and bullshit.

Members here should be savings these screenshots to their hard drives. I'm sure Jooboo is calling the ADL/SPLC to get to scrubbing this pronto. Withing a few days, everyone in the world will have figured out that they've been had.

The changing of the timestamp on facebook pages, the United Way and even Google itself just proves that time is relative. It would only take about 5 minutes to change the time server at the United Way AND Google in order to put out the "anti-conspiracy" proof that the time had been tampered with and therefore the "conspiracy" must be false. I am sure that this would be only a small thing.

Hey Boo - did you ever notice that your computer seems to pick up the right time every time you are on the Internet?

Edited to add: I just did the Google search date range 12/10 through 12/14 and you also get all kinds of other bots and search pages showing the same things on the same dates, as well as some things shown on 12/13. Now how do we explain that Google indexed it and a bunch of other bots all indexed it - all the same datestamps?

Internet Time Server A Time Server is a device connected to the network that has trusted time and responds to a computer request for time information by using one of several internet time protocols. By far the most commonly used time protocol is the Network Time Protocol (NTP). Other time protocols include the Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP), Time and Daytime. Generally what is meant by an Internet Time Server is a Time Server connected to the Internet that is available for public use. It responds to time queries from computers all over the world. By installing the NTP client software on each of your workstations, and then directing each of them to get their time from the Internet Time Server, you can keep your network synchronized. This is fine as far as it goes but many IT Administrators want a dedicated time server installed inside their firewall. Why? There are several reasons but the main one is security. Using an Internet Time Server means you have to open a "hole" in your firewall (UDP 123). This brings with it a risk of attack from the outside. With a time server inside your firewall you have control over all aspects of synchronizing your network and you can keep your firewall as intact as possible. There are many Internet Time Servers available around the world for public use. For a comprehensive list go to ntp.isc.org.

We can all take the FEMA IS 120.a training. Go here:

http://emilms.fema.gov/IS120A/index.htm

This will show you how a FEMA exercise works. It will tell you all you need to know about FEMA exercises.

I've entertained the notion that the Medical Examiner was acting out the scenario in his press interview, and he knew he was misrepresenting the facts, and that was the basis for his comment that he hoped it would not all come down on their heads. The minute any of these people knowingly make false or deceptive statements publicly, they become insiders in the real agenda--and are locked into their lies and to silence about anything they know. I think that was the purpose of the NDAA, which is truly similar to Hitler's Night and Fog decree. See here: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/l-90.asp The NDAA is for 'insiders'--people who know and need to shut up about the agenda. Your problem goes away if the person causing it goes away. This is how Stalin worked in the Soviet Union. Problems were solved by people disappearing. No trial necessary. This is the stick part of the need for silence. The carrot part is that the participants get paid well with bonuses and career advancements. Keep your eyes open on the careers of the Cops and the Medical Examiner at Sandy Hook, and remember the faces of the actor/parents who will show up again and again in future exercises of this type. And watch for people who disappear. There was a nurse that treated people in Aurora that disappeared by drowning shortly after the incident. No doubt some of the actors at Sandy Hook will disappear into the night and fog. We'll never know why.


Hatha

Holy crap you should check out chapter 5 of that training manual. There is a short video on the last slide. This is the whole play-book. Acting out disasters in a believable and realistic manner. Fucking hollywood reality Teevee.


link:

http://emilms.fema.gov/IS120A/module5.htm

This thread has become a great one, regardless of the guy trying to kill it, it will not die, Well JQP will not see this info but we do and can give it out like fish heads to oriental guys.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slvrbugjim

This thread has become a great one, regardless of the guy trying to kill it, it will not die, Well JQP will not see this info but we do and can give it out like fish heads to oriental guys.

---

..?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ares

Only problem with that logic is that you can't do that on a production web hosting service. Especially one that has many hundreds or thousands of users. You'll run in to some major problems with database backups.

---

True, but is it in fact hosted with other sites, and/or were other sites affected? I'm trying to avoid being indoctrinated into the cult of moonbat before seeing something substantial.