Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·

For All The Jural Assemblies - 59 Lessons in Sovereignty

First of all, sovereignty is inherited. It is not something that simply devolves upon us by virtue of winning a war. You have all inherited "sovereignty in your own right" and the right to own property --- as opposed to being considered property -- by being born on the land and soil of your State of the Union.

Second of all, the Delegation of Powers under the Constitutions would not be possible if the Americans had not established Sovereignty. A King can delegate powers to a Queen, or to another King, to exercise in his behalf, but no one of lesser standing can do this. The simple fact that the British Monarch has been in receipt of Delegated Powers of ours since 1787 is all the evidence needed to prove that we possessed sovereignty prior to the establishment of the Constitutions.

Third, our actual claim to sovereignty is based upon the Norman Conquest and a particular kind of sovereignty called "sovereignty in one's own right" that William the Conqueror bequeathed to his loyal Barons in England. In essence, he made land grants to each one following the Conquest, and upon his death in 1087 A.D., he made all of them "sovereigns in their own right" in England.

They were still "Barons" in France, and owed Williams's heir fealty in France; but in England, they were kings with permanent hereditary holdings of land. In England, King John was just one among many kings, and the only distinction of his office was that he was responsible for the maintenance and preservation of the Church's properties and the "Commonwealth" land.

The Commonwealth was co-administered by the Church and amounted to waste land and property that the King entrusted to the Church to develop and manage for the benefit and support of the Paupers, the Sick, and others not able to support themselves.

The Church took over these "commonwealth" properties and used them for good purposes in the communities they served. They used these properties to create common grazing fields, to establish orchards, apiaries, and herb and medicinal gardens, community vegetable gardens, and cemeteries. Rarely, the Church inherited "good wooded ground" --- woodlots, and more rarely still, they were able to convert swamps into arable land via installing drainage ditches, dikes, and dams. The profits were used to support the Church's charity efforts.

So, it was King John's position as "the" King involved in these activities that gave him any special position in England at the time of the Magna Carta; if John had been King of the country in truth and fact, then he could not be held to the Magna Carta longer than the ink was dry and he denied his free-willing consent to it.

The fact that the Magna Carta has stood on the land and soil jurisdiction until this day is again testimony to the fact that the French Norman Barons and their progeny, acting at the time of the Magna Carta--- basically a 128 years after The Settlement of the Norman Conquest, were certainly in possession of "sovereignty in the own right" and as equal kings on the land and soil of England were able to impose their demands lawfully upon King John despite whatever he wanted and despite what the Pope wanted, either.

The Belle Chers, the family of William the Conqueror -- his Cousins and other relatives who remained in England, intermarried and settled in, all as sovereigns in their own right. Their names became Anglicized to "Belcher" and they formed a special alliance with the Clintwoods, a noble English family, an alliance that endured for many generations and followed them to America.

In early America, one branch of the Belchers acted as the Royal Governors of areas that would one day become three States of the Union, but this branch -- headed by Governor Jonathan Belcher, founder of Princeton University, died out; the Belchers who remained in America retained both their ties to England and their ties to the Clintwood family.

William Belcher (the name "William" is retained for many, many generations and derives from William the Conquer and Guilleroi de Lancelot du Lac the son of King Ban of Gaul, our common ancestor) was here and sided with the Colonists against George III, and as he possessed sovereignty in his own right, inherited from his Norman French ancestors, he was fully competent to stand toe-to-toe with George III, just as the Norman Barons were competent to stand down King John.

Sovereignty operates in the national and international jurisdictions. When sovereignty is changed upon the soil, that is, the national jurisdiction, we see total regime change. The names of countries change. Their systems of government change. Most of the time, challenges to sovereignty occur in the international jurisdiction of the land and sea, with pushing and shoving over trade policies and offshore fishing rights and those sorts of things.

In both cases, whether national or international (domestic or non-domestic) sovereignty is exercised according to the demands of the jurisdiction. On the soil, the sovereign acts as the personification of the people. In the international jurisdiction of the land, the sovereign acts as the Lawful Person personifying the People of a country. In the international jurisdiction of the sea, the sovereign acts a the Legal Person personifying the Legal Personages of a nation.

But what happens when "sovereignty in one's own right" is bequeathed to many people, instead of just one? As William the Conqueror did, and as William Belcher did? Then every man and woman in inheritance of such sovereignty, becomes equal to the King or Queen of any other country, and the entire system of Monarchy is overwhelmed.

From the standpoint of the British Monarchs and the Popes, this is the most damaging part of both the Norman Conquest and the American War of Independence, because it serves to destroy the elitist system of Feudalism (including Corporate Feudalism) upon which they depend. According to their reasoning, for one man to be king, all others must be in subjection.

According to the Williams --- men whose names mean "Resolute Protector"-- this is hogwash. According to them, all Mankind can earn their sovereignty and as far as Americans are concerned, we need only seize upon our birthright and refuse the Nanny State options offered by the Queen and the Popes.

As a result of our unique history and our unique Constitutional system, it has been very hard for them to weasel in and make false claims to the effect that we have knowingly and voluntarily "gifted" our Good Names and Estates to them in exchange for being taken care and bossed around and exploited as property by the Kings and/or the Popes.

It has taken decades and not a little prevarication and clandestine undisclosed contracting processes, plus falsification of records, for them to establish the current system of Corporate Feudalism on our shores --- but all it really takes is for Americans to wake up and remember their inheritance, claim back their birthright political status, and take up the job of being sovereigns in their own right again.

On the soil jurisdiction all such sovereigns are one of the people of the soil, on the land jurisdiction they are one of the People known to be Lawful Persons, and on the international jurisdiction of the sea, they are Legal Persons.

When you return your Legal Person to the land and soil jurisdiction, it becomes a Lawful Person --- owed all the guarantees and protections of the Constitutions. You come back into your birthright inherited status as a "sovereign in your own right".

When you return all the derivative names, including the STRAWMEN to the land and soil and declare their permanent domicile on the land and soil of an American State, they are lawfully converted and they, too, are owed all the guarantees of the Constitutions.

Because sovereignty is inherited from other sovereigns, you cannot avoid being a sovereign in your own right from the moment of your birth, but you can (if it is done consciously and voluntarily -- which in our case, it never is) "pledge" allegiance to other sovereigns or symbols, and become subjected to them as a result.

Generations of American school children have been taught to pledge their allegiance to an inanimate symbol --- the Federal War Flag --- without realizing that they are presumed to be subjecting themselves to the Queen who is flying our own flag under our delegated powers.

Various means of entrapment and identity theft have been used to "capture" and "seize upon" American sovereigns and to unlawfully convert them into US Citizens who are subjects of the Queen and into Citizens of the United States who are subjects of the Popes, but all this activity has been without disclosure, rendering all such pretended citizenship obligations moot and unenforceable so long as you are prepared to stand up and exercise the sovereignty that is your inheritance and birthright--- the sovereignty in your own right --- of all Free Men and Women.

Many questions have been raised about James Clinton Belcher and his role in all this. During the Theodore Roosevelt Administration the Scottish Interloper doing business as "The United States of America, Inc." founded in 1868, was preparing to go bankrupt. James' Great-Uncle, Clintwood Belcher, rode to Washington, DC, to take possession of the Great Seals --- The Great Seal of the United States of America and The Great Seal of the United States.

On his way home, as he crossed over into Maryland, he was viciously attacked by men waiting to ambush him. In the resulting fight, he killed six of his attackers. His own horse was killed also. He grabbed one of the dead men's horses and rode off into the night, making for the western Frontier to save his life.

They stole the Great Seals and they lied about the whole circumstance and branded Clintwood Belcher as a "horse thief" --- neatly omitting their own grand theft under deadly force, their intent to murder, their killing of his horse, and all the rest of it. He spent the rest of his life "on the lam", always looking over his shoulder, always moving from place to place to place. Theodore Roosevelt considered him "a danger to our government"--- self-evidently meaning the foreign Territorial usurpers on our shores.

Clintwood died without issue, so the torch passed to his younger brother, James, and from James to his son Orville, and from Orville to his son, James Clinton Belcher. At the time my husband was born in 1941, Federal Agents were still hunting and harassing members of the family. Orville Belcher moved his young son twelve times in the first ten years of his life, constantly moving just as Great-Uncle Clintwood had to move and keep moving to avoid being arrested on false charges or be murdered outright.

This is not a glamorous story. It's a painful, scary, shameful story, in which good men were replaced by bad men, honorable men replaced by crooks, and innocent people who were the victims of crime were portrayed as criminals ----while the actual criminals sat at ease on the White House lawn. The Belchers have lived poor and they have lived rough, but through it all, they remembered who they are. They remembered their hereditary offices. They remembered their lineage. They never ceased the search to recover the Great Seals.

The Great Seals surfaced briefly in New York City in the possession of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. They have now surfaced again in Indonesia. From our perspective, the Belchers are still the owners of the Seals no matter how many generations of pirates may possess them --- under mandate and Maxim of Law: "Possession by pirates does not change ownership."
Nor, obviously, do any documents that have been impressed with those seals since their theft during the first Roosevelt Administration have any validity or power to bind us, as they have been exercised without our knowledge or consent.

The custodians of the Great Seals in Indonesia are under demand to return them to us as stolen property. If these heirlooms are not returned, we shall have them re-cast in their original form.
It should be noted that the Office of Hereditary Head of State is not a Public Office. It is a Private Trust Office, a Lawful Person, and while it is an Office which James Clinton Belcher claims by direct descent, the reason for doing so is to prove to the Queen that yes, we still exist. It is not only those who received sovereignty at the hands of our ancestor: it is also those who received life from his body and soul who are still here on these shores.

There is no plausible excuse for the Queen or the Pope to continue their pillaging on our shores.
Now, you are being called upon to remember who you are, too. Americans. Sovereigns in your own right. Not "United States Citizens" who are subjects of the British Queen. Not "Citizens of the United States" who are subjects of the Roman Pontiff.

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

The Existential Problem

People often ask me --- how did all this get started?
My mind reels. Adam and Eve, I think gloomily. But it is nothing so poetic.

It's just the facts of our life cycle. It takes a long time to produce a fully functioning, educated, morally and emotionally sound, intellectually complete man or woman, and a lot of hard work, time, money, and effort to produce this result.

Then, there are those who --- one way or another --- are hurt, damaged, unable to function and support themselves. They need care, therapy, assistance of all kinds, too.

Finally, we have the seniors, who after working all their lives, are suffering the pains and problems of old age. Eventually, if we live long enough, we all need help just to get out of bed and eat and get to the bathroom and do our laundry and all the most mundane things.

This is the reality. The 'burden" of the young, the old, the sick, the crippled, the mentally ill, the addicted, and everyone else who simply cannot or will not contribute, is all resting on those of us who are able to work and care and think and contribute, and that slice of the population -- about 35% of us --- has to pay for and carry all the rest.

That is the existential problem.

This is what the Church has struggled with for centuries. How do you get people to do the right thing?

Left to themselves, people are mostly too selfish to provide enough money to feed and clothe and care for and educate orphaned children and abandoned elderly, too busy working for their own benefit and survival to take on the extra load of the sick and mentally ill, the victims of accident and those who have incapacitated themselves with drugs and other addictions.

Above and beyond this reality, there is the constant need to build and maintain infrastructure --- roads and communications and ports and all the rest of the physical structure and service delivery systems that make life pleasant and business possible.

So -- how to take care of people who need help, which is the duty of any decent culture, while at the same time building, expanding, and maintaining infrastructure and service systems?

It's a tall order.
For centuries the Church attempted to do this via voluntary collections and donations and "tithes" which are essentially taxes on parishioners, and also added in the volunteer work of the clergy and members of churches who contributed their time and labor and expertise for free.

But now it's time to rethink everything that has gone before.
The corporations of this world owe the people of this world, and it's payback time. The stellar operating feature of the Corporate Feudalism we have suffered is the amassing of gigantic Slush Funds that generate large amounts of profit and which allow for coercive control of commerce.

So, why not re-task these Slush Funds to earn money to pay for all the existential needs we have --- set the people free and let the corporations be the slaves? Lift the burden off our shoulders and let the earnings of these already amassed Slush Funds go to new purposes? Existential purposes.

Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·

Bottom of the Ninth

It's the bottom of the ninth.....
Grandma's cupboard is bare.....

I normally give the lion's share of my income to support the efforts of The Living Law Firm and the researchers and paralegals supporting us, but it isn't going to happen this month. This month, Grandma has had problems of her own.

My dog who famously survived lymphoma by eating dandelion root also suffers from laryngeal paralysis, an inherited affliction of older Labradors that affects their voice box -- their bark and the opening and closing mechanisms of their wind pipe. This in turn affects their ability to pant and cool down. In hot weather, it is potentially deadly.

Now, my dog is old, but he is otherwise in good shape and as lively and playful as ever. So doing the Tie-Back Surgery has given him a new lease on whatever life he has left. I wish you could all see how happy he is, now that the surgery is over and he can pant to his heart's delight in this warm weather.

So in terms of things that matter to me, taking care of my animals and giving them the best care and the most life and best life I can, is a priority.

Also this past week, my son suffered a dental emergency that has resulted in dental surgery and we all know what that means in terms of the Big Bucks.

So, no, I won't be contributing a whole lot to The Living Law Firm and the researchers this month, because I can't. Those of you who can---- we are sitting here with every free-booter in the Western World trying to overcome our claims to our own country --- and yes, we need your help.

My PayPal is: avannavon@gmail.com and checks and other donations can be sent to: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652. Please make checks payable to me, because I then distribute to researchers and paralegals and others in addition to just those non-Bar lawyers who are part of The Living Law Firm.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

First of all, sovereignty is inherited.

---

Definition of ALIEN ... American Sovereign in his probationary state.

Quote:

---

INHERITANCE, estates. A perpetuity in lands to a man and his heirs; or it is
the right to succeed to the estate of a person who died intestate. Dig. 50,
16, 24. The term is applied to lands.
2. The property which is inherited is called an inheritance.
3. The term inheritance includes not only lands and tenements which
have been acquired by descent, but also every fee simple or fee tail, which
a person has acquired by purchase, may be said to be an inheritance, because
the purchaser's heirs may inherit it. Litt. s. 9.
4. Estates of inheritance are divided into inheritance absolute, or fee
simple; and inheritance limited, one species of which is called fee tail.
They are also divided into corporeal, as houses and lands and incorporeal,
commonly called incorporeal hereditaments. (q. v.) 1 Cruise, Dig. 68; Sw.
163; Poth. des Retraits, n. 2 8.
5. Among the civilians, by inheritance is understood the succession to
all the rights of the deceased. It is of two kinds, 1 . That which arises by
testament, when the testator gives his succession to a particular person;
and, 2. That which arises by operation of law, which is called succession ab
intestat. Hein. Lec. El. Sec. 484, 485.

---

You see this is precisely why I suggest you not have a will and testament. Things such as incorporeal rights that are not addressed are not a part of this first kind of succession .. by testament. What is important is those incorporeal rights arising out of operation of law ... aka 'succession ab intestat'.

This then reminds me of an observation from the 1983 farm crisis that goes

Did you hear of the Nebraska farmer who got nabbed for child abuse?

He tried to leave the farm to the kids.

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

The Smelly Roses -- Public Notice and Demand.

When it comes to talking about money, I still have to overcome waves of cognitive dissonance. Here is a good example of it from Egon von Greyez:
"In the West, ordinary people’s standard of living has been maintained by increasing personal debt and also by governments running ever bigger deficits. These deficits are used for buying the votes of the average citizen to improve the perceived standard of living at the cost of an ever increasing national debt. "

This is an example of what everyone assumes, what everyone believes, and what everyone endlessly prattles--- but, this is not what is directly, observably true. What is true and what you can see for yourself is quite different:

The foreign subcontractors running the Federal Government came in and passed "legal tender" laws, and forced everyone to accept "Notes" --- that is, I.O.U.s --- as money. As a result, you haven't been paid for anything, not your goods, not your labor, for decades. You haven't been allowed access to the corresponding National Credit you have earned, either. This is what causes any "National Debt" --- and it isn't your National Debt.

It's the debt of the Queen and the Popes who created and enforced this system on their Federal Employees, and then failed to ride herd on it.

We, Americans, were supposed to get exemptions and to be able to exercise Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges that were never provided to us. Instead, the vermin instituted a vast identity theft scheme to "redefine" us all as United States Citizens and/or Citizens of the United States, so as to deny us access to the Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges and exemptions we are owed.

Mr. von Greyez has been bamboozled along with everyone else into assuming that we, rank and file Americans, are responsible for this " National Debt" and that it is the result of reckless overspending and under-producing on our part, or, that alternatively, it's all the fault of "useless eaters", all the poor people riding on our Socialist coat-tails....

That's exactly what the perpetrators of this colossal scam wish for us to assume, but we have two eyes and two ears and a brain, don't we?

Look at what has actually happened. We have contributed our goods and labor in exchange for corporate I.O.U.'s since the 1930's and we have never been paid anything for it, not money and not credit, either. That's what the "US National Debt" is--- THEIR debt to us, not our debt to them.

So, the source of the debt and the problem is not reckless overspending on our part and it is not the fault of all the poor people receiving welfare benefits, either.

This whole situation is the fault of the Queen and of the Popes who allowed: (1) the imposition of "Legal Tender" laws on the Federal Employees; (2) the identity theft of Americans and mis-characterization of Americans as either United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, thereby cheating us out of our exemptions and the Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges we are owed.

These Grafters are running no less than three (3) primary Bunko Schemes at once on the American States and People, all under color of law:
1. Identity Theft --- claiming that we are all either United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, that is, some species of Federal Employee or Dependent, and amassing falsified registrations and undisclosed contracts as evidence for their False Claims;

2. Credit Fraud --- based on the Identity Theft -- they claim that we are accommodation parties and co-signers allowing them to access our private and public assets as collateral backing their borrowing.

They access our credit via a process of "hypothecation of debt" which leaves us totally unaware of what they are doing. They charge our "credit cards" up over the max, then claim bankruptcy protection for themselves, and leave us on the hook as co-signers to pay their debts for them.

3. Abandoned Assets Scheme -- based on Identity Theft -- as a result of mis-characterizing us as United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, they deny us access not only to any actual payment for our goods and services, they also deny us access to the credit that we earned as a result of their receipt of our goods and services.

Over time, this results in the massive accrual of our National Credit which exactly mirrors their National Debt. Bearing in mind that they have deliberately kept us from accessing this credit via the initial Identity Theft, they then propose to come in and claim that our National Credit is a "gift" to the Church or that it is "Abandoned Assets" left unclaimed by unknown parties who are "lost at sea, presumed dead."

The problem for them is that all of this was completely undisclosed and non-consensual and the result of unconscionable contracting practices and Gross Breach of Trust.

A good 90% of us are not "United States Citizens" nor are we "Citizens of the United States". We were not given full disclosure and were instead deliberately misinformed.

We aren't lost at sea. We are back home, standing on solid ground, and we are claiming all our rights, all our constitutional guarantees, all our assets, including our purloined credit.

That includes all the Historic Trust Money and actual Assets left on deposit with all the various Federal Banks and Savings and Loans across the country and around the world. We are the Priority Creditors and we, the Lawful People, are also the actual Trustees--- not the Bank Trustees. Not, in other words, Kim Gougen, and not, for example, Manna World Holdings Trust. Not Karen Hudes and any Dropbox created to bail out the criminals at the World Bank, either.

This is Public Notice and Demand:
Deposits of actual assets in the possession of commercial banks are lawful goods and can belong only to Lawful People. That means us, the actual Depositors.

Deposits are loans made to banks and are bank liabilities. Our deposits don't belong to the banks, and they are not abandoned assets, and they are not subject to claims by bank creditors. Those actual asset deposits belong to the depositors who are the Primary Creditors of all these banks. Period.

Along with all the other criminal mischief promoted by our Federal Public Servants, both Territorial and Municipal, they have offered to mis-characterize Depositors as United States Citizens and/or Citizens of the United States, too, and thereby offer an excuse for stealing our Trust Deposits and actual assets left on deposit in Federal Banks and Federal Savings and Loans.

The assignment of Bank Trustees by the Bank to oversee these accounts does not mean that the Bank Trustee takes precedent or authority over the actual Private Trustees who made the Deposit, and no phony claim that we are "acting as" United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States can stand in our presence otherwise.

All the phony dossiers that the schemers have created via the IRS are also fully discovered. It turns out that, for example, I am not the manager of a rum distillery in Barbados and I am mad as Hell to discover than any such fanciful "colorable" idea has ever been advanced by any flat-rumped bureaucrat in my employment.

It's time to make a deal or sit down and shut up. The Sword of Truth hangs over all your heads. The People --- not only of this country --- but the whole world, are now fully informed.

Anna von Reitz
17 hrs ·

Lawful People, Lawful Money, Lawful Remedy.....

People come to me and they want to argue.

They have a clear view of their part of the "Elephant" and they want to argue about it.

If they have hold of the trunk, they want to tell me all about how it is long and flexible and tapered and seems to be hollow. If they have grabbed a leg, they are telling me about how it is rock solid and cylindrical. If they have hold of an ear, well, then, it is flat and flexible and flops back and forth like a piece of heavy cloth....

Then, of course, they want to argue with each other, too.

Which one is right? They all are.

They are just experiencing the government and the court system from different directions.

It's important to step back and realize we have a whole "Elephant" here.

This morning I got a stream of emails because a "Petition of Remonstrance" was not heard by nor addressed by the State of New Hampshire Legislature. No big surprises here in Alaska.

When you "petition" anyone or anything, you give up your sovereignty to them, like a little kid petitioning for a cookie. Does the parent have the right to ignore such a petition and go on doing the laundry?

And as it turns out, the Petition was mis-addressed. Why ask Joe about Joseph's business? It doesn't make sense, does it? The names are similar, but there are two different parties involved.

So there again, why would the State of New Hampshire have a word to say about New Hampshire's business?

This was followed by more emails back and forth, with people discovering that we don't have any courts. Oh, my.

If I recall correctly, I came to the conclusion that all we have functioning as courts here (with very few exceptions) are:

(1) Administrative Tribunals that handle In-House disputes for the corporations;

(2) Maritime (Commercial) Courts operating under Admiralty Jurisdiction granted by Article III, Section 2 and exercised via the Special Supplemental Rules of the Federal Code of Civil Procedure;

(3) Admiralty Courts functioning under Article III and the US Code of Military Justice: Military "Common Law".

That was about five years ago, but the startled squawking about this "discovery" goes on anyway. Then the same people who say that I am wrong go on to prove me right, and the only thing that is accomplished is that more time and energy is wasted while everyone gropes the elephant.

The reason we don't have any courts is that we haven't been acting in our rightful capacity as Lawful People (we were unaware that we had been "redefined" as "Legal Persons" instead) and we have not, as a result, provided ourselves with the Lawful Courts we are owed under the Constitutions.

That's right. We have been defrauded, that's true, and we have every right to bring claims and take action.

But at the other end of the day, our lack of an honest court system for the service of Lawful People is our own fault. We are the ones we have been waiting for.

There is a Lawful System. We have to build it back up.

There is a Legal System. They own it "in our names".

Deal with the facts, folks.

We are naturally Lawful Persons known as "People", but when we are just babes in our cradles, the perpetrators of the Great Fraud sneak in, get our mothers to sign undisclosed contracts, and use that as the basis to redefine us as Legal Persons, instead.

No notice is given, so of course, you are unaware and unable to rebut their legal presumption and their deceitfully fabricated evidence (the Birth Certificate) that you are acting as a "Legal Person" and not as a "Lawful Person".

That is, until now, when you have all been given not only the history of how this came to be, but also the tools you need to correct the situation and reclaim your status as a Lawful Person and one of the People of this country.

Go to: www.annavonreitz.com and scroll down to Article 928.

There is a logic to be observed. There are Lawful People living under the Public Law of this country, and those Lawful People are owed all the Lawful Money and Actual Assets, and they are also the ones owed all Lawful Relief and Remedy as well.

Legal Persons have no such rights nor property interests.

Underline that statement, put it in large boldface letters in your mind. Think about it. Think about what it implies. If you don't get busy and reclaim your lawful birthright political status, you stand to be cheated out of your birthright and sold a bowl of porridge in purportedly equitable exchange.

If you want to address the actual problem at its roots and stop flailing away like a flock of disturbed pigeons arguing about elephants, do the paperwork to correct your political status, enter into your Lawful Capacity as one of the Lawful People of this country, join your Lawful State Assembly, and restore your Lawful Counties, Lawful States, and their associated Lawful Courts to serve the needs of the Lawful People.

Your country needs you to wake up --- all the way up. The watch fires are lit and burning.

Go to TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net

Anna von Reitz
16 hrs ·

Lawful Marriage

It's "Marriage Season" --- or so I am told. More marriages take place in June than in any other month of the year. I've been thumping on everyone about the word "Lawful" this week, as opposed to "Legal" so now we have the topic of "Lawful Marriage".

What is a "Lawful Marriage" as opposed to a "Legal Marriage"?

A Lawful Marriage is one that takes place on the land and soil of an actual, factual country. It takes place according to the Law of Scripture and the Public Law of the country and internationally it is recognized as a Simple Treaty under the Law of Nations.

It's both a private agreement and a public agreement between two people to live together and enter into all the rights and responsibilities of married life.

A "Legal Marriage" is a Joint Venture between two Legal Persons chartered by a State of State, subject to the Statutory Laws of that State of State. The State of State, like the State of Washington, issuing the new franchise charter is an undisclosed Third Party having an "interest" in the JV and the "products thereof"---- your children.

Obviously, you want to have your ducks in order and be making a deliberate choice about which kind of "marriage" you are entering into.

I've had distraught parents contact me seeking help to protect their children who are now planning to get married and not knowing the difference between these two kinds of marriage. They don't want their children and grandchildren to be reduced to mere businesses operating a JV under the thumb of State of State subcontractors.

The basic situation is the same as what we encountered with the Baby Deed. If we don't record our baby's true identity as an American State National, the freebooters sneak in and register our baby's name as a Legal Person and Ward of their State of State organization, leaving him or her --- and their parents --- at the mercy of the Territorial State of State.

To counteract, we record the Baby Deed at the land recording office and seize ownership to our own children on the Public Record. If the State of State then registers our baby's name, it is clearly and demonstrably a secondary claim and is not owed any enforcement against the parents.

Straightening out your own political status records and recording that little Baby Deed on the land jurisdiction puts you back in control of your lives and the lives of your children. It's the same way with marriages.

You need to record your Lawful Marriage with the Land Recording Office, prior to or in concert with any "registration" of the new "vessel" with the State of State organization.

To that end, our team has constructed a new recording instrument that does for marriages what the Baby Deed does for babies ---- establishes your marriage as a Lawful Marriage on the Public Record.

This document is called a "Solemn Record and Proclamation of Lawful Marriage" and will be found --together with instructions-- with the Article 928 documents at my website, www.annavonreitz.com and hopefully will soon also be available on TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net website.

Those receiving this as an email will also receive a "red-line" copy of the form and instructions.

Recording this "Solemn Record and Proclamation of Lawful Marriage" protects your marriage from being treated as a commercial contract and prevents you and your children from being subjected to the unilateral demands of Territorial and Municipal Agencies.

For your own safety and sanity and for the well-being of your children, be sure to fill out the "Solemn Record and Proclamation of Lawful Marriage" and record it with the Land Recording Office nearest you. This is evidence that you are acting as living people getting married and not functioning as business entities engaged in a Joint Venture merger---- which is how your marriage will otherwise be "interpreted" by the existing court systems.

I will also point out that doing this prevents a lot of the other heartaches that can be associated with marriages --- CPS, forced vaccinations, denial of home school rights, inequitable divorces, and a whole lot more can be settled privately and should be settled privately by arbitration. Just make sure to get your "Solemn Record and Proclamation of Lawful Marriage" properly witnessed and recorded and forestall any ability of the pirates to exercise their "discretion" with regard to what kind of marriage you have entered into.

Anna von Reitz
15 hrs ·

Court Action versus Private Arbitration

Most of what passes for "court action" in our present morass of ignorance is instead the private processing of corporate tribunal decisions that are not the actions of any Public Court at all.

Any time you see a docket sheet where the style of the name of the Court and the Plaintiffs and the Defendants all match, you are looking at an action in a private corporate tribunal designed to administratively settle disputes among the officials and employees and shareholders of the corporation.

If the court is captioned (named and described) in an Upper and Lower Case name and the Plaintiffs and Defendants are too, you are looking at a Territorial Administrative Tribunal case.

If the court is captioned in all capital letters and the Plaintiffs and Defendants are also, you are looking at a MUNICIPAL COURT TRIBUNAL.

These Administrative Court Tribunals conduct about 90% of all court actions in this country.

They all function by presuming that you are either an officer or an employee or a shareholder or a dependent of a corporation, and assume that whatever is being brought forward for adjudication is an internal dispute to be settled according to the internal statutory laws of the corporation (Administrative Code) and State Statutes and Public Policies of that corporation.

So, once again, it is up to you to "declare your law" and to choose which court you do business with, and also up to you to decide whether you address a court at all----- unless of course, someone else is trying to choose your law and your court "for" you. That's another whole discussion.

For the moment, let's just concentrate on the fact that when you bring forward something for settlement, it is your choice of law and your decision to address either a court or seek private arbitration that largely determines the outcome.

Most people in this country approve of land jurisdiction courts where the Ten Commandments form the basis for the Law being administered, but those courts were taken out of action surreptitiously by our "Public Servants" in order to better serve themselves.

So now what? A corporate administrative tribunal doesn't fit who you are or what you need in terms of services, and the gozillion codes and statutes and policies of these corporations don't meet your needs as a living man or woman.

Chances are you are just waking up to the fact that you are being "impersonated" as a corporate entity and a legal fiction entity, and not being recognized as a living man or a Lawful Person, either one.

Chances are you don't know the variations of laws and codes and statutes and all the corporate legalese, all the court procedures, all the court rules.....

So that leaves you a stranger in a strange land and makes you easy pickings for these predators. You really are unprepared to interact with these courts, and they know it. They set it up that way, the better to profit themselves and to keep rigid control of you and your assets.

But when you are bringing the action, you do have an option. You can seek private arbitration instead. Arbitration has many advantages over court actions, not the least of which is simplicity. In arbitration all you have to do is establish the form of law, the identities of the parties, and the nature of the conflict.

You can sit down together like rational people and speak plain English and be heard. The Arbiter is free to render a judgment based on the principles of justice apart from any corporate policies--- and they often do so with great prejudice against those perpetuating injustice. You just don't hear about these cases because they are private---- truly private, as opposed to the quasi-private corporate tribunal actions that are so common.

An arbitration action does not establish any precedent for anyone but you and whoever else is party to the arbitration. It does not establish any res judicata. But what it can and often does manage to deliver is justice.

So when you are standing there feeling utterly bewildered by the plethora of undisclosed courts and court operations that have nothing to do with you as a living man or woman, remember the option you do have --- private arbitration.

As a result of the corruption of the corporate court systems and the basic fact that the courts are obliged to make insupportable presumptions against you to even bring a case into their jurisdiction --- a very lively business has sprung up for Private Arbitration Services and you will find them under that heading in many metropolitan areas.

Make haste to make peace with your brother on your way to court.... and take a detour via private arbitration services instead. Until we have our own courts set up and functioning again, this is the best option for people searching for justice.

Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·

Gossip and Dangers in Common

Gossipers all seem to think that gossiping does not affect them --- but gossip does taint those who gossip just as it taints those they gossip about.

So, please, if you have been flapping your jaws and making assumptions, stop all the he-said, she-said, did-you-hear?

There's nothing bad going on and nothing to gossip about.

We are simply switching gears from second to third, and making it easier than ever for people to do their paperwork and create their land jurisdiction records and contact their State Assembly via TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net website.

We are also cutting down on all the verification work, too, because it can all be done and verified as part of one online process.

It's all a good change, and everyone is helping to make it happen.

What you have to be concerned about is what you were born with --- your birthright as an American. It's up to you to claim it or not.

The rest of us have brought forward the fact that 90% of Americans (or more) have been misidentified as US Citizens and are being denied their property rights and constitutional guarantees as a result.

We have provided the means to correct this situation and allow millions of people to enjoy the freedom and the prosperity they deserve--- for FREE.

As long as you do this in a peaceful and orderly fashion, nobody on Earth can complain, because all you are doing is reclaiming something that is already yours --- your Good Name and Estate.

Having reclaimed your birthright political status on the Public Record, you are again operating as a Lawful Person, standing on the international land jurisdiction of your State of the Union. You are again owed all the constitutional guarantees. You are free to boot up your State Assembly.

As long as you do this in order, by first correcting your own political status records and then assembling your State, nobody on Earth can complain about that, either.

The danger comes when people go off half-cocked and try to assemble their States before they have corrected their own records, because it is literally against the Constitutions for US Citizens to pretend to assemble a State of the Union, and also against the Constitutions for a State to act as a State of State.

The first fact means that if the President gets grumpy, he can order all those US Citizens engaged in groups like RuSA and T-ROH and the REPUBLIC, etc., to be arrested and charged as insurrectionists acting in conspiracy against the Constitutions, which is a very serious charge.

Now I don't want good people to be endangered and I don't want those who are doing this the right way confused with those who are doing it the wrong way.

And I don't want foreign "States of States" substituted for American States of States. Britain pulled that trick on us in 1868 and it has been repeated several times since---- always to the detriment of this country.

Enough is enough of that, too.

We are engaged in very serious business here. We are restoring a fully functioning American Government for the first time in 150 years.

A great many people have made huge sacrifices to gain the knowledge and share it with you and enable you to act upon it for yourselves. Do so. They have done all this for free --- never charged you a penny. Be grateful.

Do it the right way, be diligent, stay in your lane, and everything will all work out fine for everyone concerned. Even the US Citizens.

In the plane of the state the obligation of contracts shall not be impaired... ever.

In the plane of the federal government every contract ever entered into will become the topic of 'bankruptcy' ... 'cause ya use their notes (aka 'IOU'). This concept is embodied by an account called the NATIONAL debt.... currently standing at $346,681,016. In a sense in the federal plane the inevitability of bankruptcy shall not be questioned. You will be tolerated in this plane just so long as you swear to become an asset to be divided among the creditors.

In the plane of the watershed there are no contracts in future time. There is only now time and what came before or comes after is not known. As the federal government is prone to specify 'We all live in a watershed'. The concept of contracts embody both now and future time except you don't live in future time and have no psychic ability to predict what will happen in the future. Contracts are only about present conditions and future events. Good luck with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

In the plane of the state the obligation of contracts shall not be impaired... ever.

In the plane of the federal government every contract ever entered into will become the topic of 'bankruptcy' ... 'cause ya use their notes (aka 'IOU'). This concept is embodied by an account called the NATIONAL debt.... currently standing at $346,681,016. In a sense in the federal plane the inevitability of bankruptcy shall not be questioned. You will be tolerated in this plane just so long as you swear to become an asset to be divided among the creditors.

In the plane of the watershed there are no contracts in future time. There is only now time and what came before or comes after is not known. As the federal government is prone to specify 'We all live in a watershed'. The concept of contracts embody both now and future time except you don't live in future time and have no psychic ability to predict what will happen in the future. Contracts are only about present conditions and future events. Good luck with that.

---

When did you repeal the Declaration of Independence? Our first Constitution.

All of the organic laws for the States are still in place.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

When did you repeal the Declaration of Independence? Our first Constitution.

All of the organic laws for the States are still in place.

---

Memories occasionally become the topic of housecleaning.

Quote:

---

immemorial (adj.)
c. 1600, from French immémorial "old beyond memory" (16c.), from Medieval Latin immemorialis, from assimilated form of in- "not, opposite of" (see in- (1)) + Latin memorialis of or belonging to memory" (see memorial (n.)). Something immemorial is ancient beyond memory; something immemorable is not worth remembering. Latin immemor meant "unmindful, forgetful, heedless."

---

The Declaration of Independence was a document complaining of King Georges' behavior. King George, it appears, is now dead. Never speak ill of the dead ... a good rule 'cause they might turn into demons and come back to haunt you.

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

One Brilliant Deceit Too Many

Look at the 14th Amendment. Look at the crucial phrase, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof".

Look at the Trading With the Enemy Act. Look at the crucial phrase, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof".

What are they talking about? They are talking about "the" United States --- that is, the Municipal United States and its "Citizens of the United States".

It is not, as so many people have assumed, talking about us. It's not even talking about the Territorial "United States Citizens", either.

None of that is our "United States". None of us are naturally subject to the jurisdiction of the Municipal United States.

You will also hear that the British Parliament declared "war" on us in 1860, but if you look closely at that, you will see that it is an action against the Confederate States of States, as it had to be to prevent all of our Allies from declaring an actual war on Britain.

That this is true is underlined by the fact that the Russian Czar placed his Navy between us and the British at the end of the hostilities--- just to "remind" them of their obligations under actual international law and international treaties and service contracts and trust agreements that the rats owed us then and still owe us now.

So sharpen your wits and your eye-sight to catch the fine details and don't be misled. The actual Law is firmly on our side of the issues.

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

The Logic of It

There is a logic to all of this, and it is what it is.
There are many different potential ways to arrive at the desired result. Our paperwork is just a well-tested and simple way of regaining claim to your birthright political status and control of the various "entities" that have been created in your name.

Our process is rather limited in that it doesn't serve commercial notice of your ownership interest (UCC process) which you may additionally wish to do, though strictly speaking you aren't obligated to do in order to exercise your exemption from commercial law or to assert your ownership of your identity in all its forms. Tim Turner developed a comprehensive UCC process that is still rock solid and widely available.

Our process is also rather limited in that it doesn't address the Paramount Claim, which in my opinion is the most important, as it claims your DNA and uniqueness of being back to the moment of conception. We make a basic Paramount Claim available and recommend it highly, but the real expert is Kurt Kallenbach, so if you want to have things nailed down to a gnat's eyelash, do his Paramount Claim as well.

What we address with our simplified stripped down version is getting back to your birthright status as an American and getting control of your identity and property assets so that these foreign commercial corporations operating the two remaining branches of the Federal Government are discouraged from "mistaking" you as one of their employees or dependents and railroading you under false legal presumptions.

The logic of it is that you have been mis-identified almost since birth as a United States Citizen. That fundamental impersonation has then led to your name also being interpreted as that of a Municipal PERSON or to be more exact, PERSONS, all of which are Citizens of the United States. Your actual birthright political standing has not been brought forward on the Public Record at all, so you cannot be recognized as one of the People of your State and your country as a whole. So this circumstance has to be corrected. How you correct it and what correction is possible for you at this time is highly dependent on your own situation.

Federal Civil Service employees for example, are required by their jobs to maintain an identity as a CITIZEN of the United States, but are not obligated to function as United States Citizens. They may wish to expatriate from any presumption of United States Citizenship and adopt their birthright State Citizenship or State National status instead; because Federal workers are allowed to have Dual Citizenship, they may choose which citizenships they want to have.

The same basic situation applies to Territorial (Military) employees and Dependents. They are required by their job to maintain their United States Citizenship status, but may choose to expatriate from any presumption of Municipal United States Citizenship (that is, cease acting as "Citizens of the United States) and opt for their birthright political status as Minnesotans or Californians for example. Again, as Federal workers, they can have Dual Citizenship and choose which citizenships they honor.

For the rest of us, we can avoid the whole issue of any Federal citizenship obligations whatsoever, and choose the singular status of our birthright as Texans, New Yorkers, Californians, etc. That is our actual nationality and we can function as State Nationals and never accept any citizenship obligations to serve any government at all. Or, after the age of 21, we can accept the responsibilities of State Citizenship, and become State Citizens of Texas, New York, etc. We do not have a Dual Citizenship option because our States of the Union don't provide that or recognize Dual Citizenship.

Thus we remain "foreign" to both the Federal Territorial and Federal Municipal government corporations, though from their standpoint, Americans working for them can retain their American State National or State Citizenship in tandem with whichever other citizenship applies, either Territorial "United States Citizenship" or Municipal "Citizenship of the United States".

As you can see, for Joe Average American, things are simple. You either live as a State National or as a State Citizen.

It's only when issues of Federal Citizenship arise that things get more confusing and complex.

For most of us, we don't naturally have or desire or receive any benefit from Federal citizenship of either kind, and we are best served by correcting our political status and expatriating our names from any presumption of Territorial or Municipal citizenship "conferred" on us without our knowledge or consent as babies in our cradles.

For Territorial workers and dependents, they are better off not being additionally burdened by Municipal CITIZENSHIP, and are better served by claiming their natural American State political status as their second citizenship.

For Municipal workers and dependents, they are better off not being additionally burdened by Territorial Citizenship, and are better off claiming
their natural American State political status, too.
In both these cases, consciously expatriating from one or more foreign political statuses that have merely been conferred upon us without our knowledge or consent, protects Federal workers by bringing them back under the guarantees of our Constitutions, just as expatriating from both presumptions of Territorial and Municipal citizenship obligations protects average Americans.

So, everyone concerned who has been born on the land and soil of one of the States has good reasons to expatriate from one or more Federal citizenship obligations and has reason to declare and adopt their birthright political status as American State Nationals.

Our paperwork is probably the simplest and cheapest way to do this and to put you back in control of your life, but not the only way possible. If in doubt, why not do our paperwork and be sure that the bases are covered? If you have done someone else's paperwork we have no way of saying if it is correct or sufficient or not, because it is not something we tested --- but if you see that it does these things:
(1) claims and reconveys your Trade Name (Given Name, Proper Name) to the land and soil of your birth State and makes that your permanent home and domicile;
(2) cancels are prior Powers of Attorney so that you are in control;
(3) claims and issues certificate of ownership of all your Assumed Names and NAMES and all permutations, orderings, styles, and punctuations of your Assumed Names and NAMES;
(4) expatriates all these Assumed Names and NAMES and all permutations, orderings, styles, and punctuations from any obligation of Territorial and Municipal Citizenship or CITIZENSHIP (our case as average Americans) or expatriation from one or the other form of Federal Citizenship (for Federal workers) --- then you have the basics in place as soon as your record these four basic forms with a land recording office.

You have to establish your true home and permanent domicile, you have to take back your own singular Power of Attorney, you have to claim ownership and control of all the "derivative" names you have been gifted with, you have to expatriate these names, as appropriate, from any presumption of Territorial and/or Municipal citizenship, depending on your own situation--- whether you are Joe Average and not actually employed by or dependent upon the Federal Government, or, if you are employed by either the Territorial or Municipal branches of the Federal Government. And you have to record these actions with a land recording office, so that they exist in the proper jurisdiction and have to be recognized by all international courts.

I hope this better explains what our basic process does. It's meant to provide large numbers of people a relatively easy means of reasserting their actual political status as Americans and to regain control of their identities and assets. Our process creates evidence that is admissible in any Territorial Court, and since we are naturally exempt from Municipal presumptions when we take exception to them (Title 50, Section 7(c) and (e)) -- it serves the purpose of returning us to our proper standing. Recorded copies of our paperwork in tandem with a Certified copy of our Birth Certificate and two Witness Testimonies confirming that we are the man or woman whose physical birth event is reflected by the Birth Certificate, establishes our ownership interest and is sufficient to rebut any and all false legal presumptions being held against us or any derivative NAME.

You can do more to "paper up" --- Tim Turner's UCC process, Kurt Kallenbach's Paramount Claim process -- both excellent.

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

Enough, Arizona

If the people in the Arizona Assembly can't get this job done without having cliques of volunteers bad-mouthing other cliques of volunteers and accusing me of taking down the PaperUpNow website---- go away.

Just admit that you are all too immature to get the job that needs to be done, done.

This is serious business. It needs serious commitment and level heads. If you can't provide both, stay home.

Those that are committed to restoring a proper government for Arizona and a better future for America will soldier on.

And just like Rhett said to Scarlett--- "Frankly, my dear...."
Arizona is your home, your State, your homes and families are there.

If you don't care enough to protect your own and do the right thing by each other, I sure as blazes am not coming all the way down there to nursemaid or coerce you, either one.

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

Memorial Day Visitation

The Virgin Mary has appeared to me exactly three times in my life. She has a presence and aura that is all her own, unique among all others, and the scent of roses fills the air around her as if all the roses of a thousand fields of bloom were present in the room.

Last night she came to me in her gentle way and gave me a bouquet of roses to bring home to you, to this world. Each rose is a gift and a blessing symbolizing some Great Good --- kindness, compassion, friendship, loyalty, generosity, hope.

All this she sent to each one of us, to our country, to our world.

I don't know what to expect. I can tell you that that was the basic thrust of the action and the message --- to deliver blessings to our world. I can also tell you that each time she appears huge changes appear soon after.

On both of the other occasions when she has come to visit me, within three days, major changes and challenges have come.

So, while I am blessed and while it has been given to me to bring blessings, too, I cannot tell you by what path or motivation or opening of doors this is to be accomplished.

Buckle up your seat belts. I am certainly buckling mine.

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

For Kevin Cote---

Let's make this perfectly clear to you, Kevin, and everyone else: Jocelyne owns PaperUpNow.com.

She put it up and she took it down and that is her decision.

I didn't "take" anything away from her. I didn't tell her to shut it down. And I certainly didn't profit from her work and leave her without compensation, as you imply.

She hasn't talked to me about selling the website.
I asked her politely, as an adult to an adult, to reconsider her decision because I believe she has a mission and that mission isn't going to happen if she lets gossip and the stupidity of others get in her way.

If she is upset and angry about her own decisions, as you say--- without any proof---- who else is to blame?

Not me, Bubba.

You, Kevin, are always stirring the pot. You did the same thing with Tressa Heywood. You don't like strong women who are competent. You undermine them every chance you get.

And here you are, trying to undermine Jocelyne and me, both at once.

You may think that this isn't being noticed and recognized for what it is, but think again.

This isn't my first time at the rodeo. I watched you spread poison through the Continental Marshals program, too. Same MO.

Since when has anyone ever had any trouble getting me to "respond"---???? Exactly what "facts" am I supposed to have ignored? And how have I twisted anything around?

You certainly have cause to know that Jocelyne both owns and controls that website. But here you are, twisting and turning, stirring the pot, giving people false information. Deliberately.

I am not a member of the Arizona Assembly and not likely to be one anytime soon.

So I suggest that you all put on your Big Girl and Big Boy pants and deal with your own internal bad behavior, sort it out, and get on the road toward something positive. Soon.

The rest of the Assemblies are moving forward and if Arizona doesn't get moving, it's not going to be ready to move forward with the rest of the States.

Anna von Reitz
12 hrs ·

Daylight in the Swamp!

If there's some lying skullduggery afoot, some mean, deceptive, sideways knife in the back, it's always the Brits. That's 100% of the time. Those who were reading my blog at the time (and anyone who cares to go back in the archives and look) will find that I reported (months and months ago) that the Brits were the ones in back of the now-infamous Dossier framing President Trump for "Russian Collusion" and now --finally--- this basic truth is coming to light.

Even if I hadn't seen British fingerprints on it, I would have still assumed out of hand, sight unseen, no questions asked --- that the Brits were the ones at the bottom of it all. And I would have also guessed that they and their American pals were in fact the ones colluding with the Russians to sell out our Uranium. So guess what?

A few days ago it came out that the Italian Secret Service was supposed to be employed to plant emails and other material gleaned from Hillary Clinton onto Trump's computers, so as to make it look like he was the one colluding when in fact it was her behind it the whole time. Look a little further into the rabbit hole and what do you find? Oh, a New York-based FBI unit was in it up to their little pink whiskers. And under whose direction were they working? Oh, the Secret Service.

Goodness me, how it all comes around and around and around and always lands back on Britain. Always in the past fifty years that I can verify. It's as if everyone else stopped stirring the pot and just let them have at it.

And here's today's news from the Alt Media---which is the only media we have left:
https://phibetaiota.net/…/mongoose-theresa-may-fired-for-a…/

Those of you who have been reading a while will also remember that I told you it was the Russian Czar who sent his navy to intervene and stand between us and the British at the end of the Civil War. I mentioned it again just recently.

Russia has often been our friend and the Brits have often been our enemies, but somehow nobody notices these things because we are not thinking and looking at the facts in front of our faces. Nor are we trying hard enough to reason our way forward from the facts.

America has always been the death-knell of feudalism and monarchy.

Every American born on our land is a sovereign in their own right. 350 million of us, all equal to the Queen. Imagine how that went down the old pipes?

And it was bad news for the Pope, too. How could absolute Papal Supremacy be maintained in a world where average people, even low-life dirty American Commoners without a shred of culture, could aspire to rule their own lives, consult their own conscience, and own their own property?

This is self-evidently why, in 1822, the then-Pope and the then-British Monarch authored and signed The Secret Treaty of Verona, admitting that our form of government was antithetical to their form of government, and agreeing secretly to undermine us in Breach of Trust.

They've been at it ever since.
They co-sponsored the Civil War. They engineered the substitution of British Territorial States of States for American States of States. They picked and chose the Presidents from Whitehall. They lapped up the cream of their perfidy. They stuck a straw in America and sucked us dry and used us as unbelievably cheap mercenaries in endless wars for profit. And they did it all behind such a nice facade that nearly everyone was content to blame all the war-mongering and evil-doing on "the Americans, the Americans, the Americans...."
Right.

They have also sought to make the Chinese and the Russians into our enemies, when in fact, neither one have been. The Chinese just want to have reliable trading partners who pay their bills. The Russians want to have peace, free markets and economic opportunities for themselves. There is nothing about our Sino-Russian relationship that is hard to observe or explain....except, why should we be enemies with them?

To put it flatly and in a nutshell --- because the Queen and the Pope want it that way.

The Chinese and Russian Communists are in fact closer in sympathy to the American Dream than the European Monarchists could ever be.
They enshrine the Worker and we enshrine the Common Man. We are not that far apart in our egalitarian attitudes. They simply focus on the group while we focus on the individual. At least we are in the same sector of the Human Values galaxy.

If we became friends and Allies with the Russians and Chinese, that would be the end of the Spiderweb in Europe, and the end of the ability of the Queen and the Pope to use America and Americans as the Bulwark for their own monopoly interests.

They'd have to pay for their own defense. They'd have to come out of the shadows and stop pretending that "the Americans" are the aggressors and bullies. They'd have to take their greasy paws off of Africa and stop meddling in the Middle East.
It would be a whole new world.

Interfering in the American elections is the least of it. They have been interfering with and funding and manipulating and hand-choosing the Electors in every election for decades. That's a no-brainer and not even worth discussing.

What should be more "newsworthy" is the fact that they have been running a de facto government on our shores in Breach of Trust for a 150 years.

It's not just the elections, folks. It's the whole Shizzam. It's the two party system. It's the Democrats and the Republicans. It's the whole concept of having two groups of lobbyists in Washington, DC, fighting over the spoils and handing off large chunks of the profits to the Pope and the Queen. It's everything we have taken for granted and "trusted" and not questioned.

Daylight in the Swamp!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

Anna von Reitz
12 hrs ·

Daylight in the Swamp!

If there's some lying skullduggery afoot, some mean, deceptive, sideways knife in the back, it's always the Brits. That's 100% of the time. Those who were reading my blog at the time (and anyone who cares to go back in the archives and look) will find that I reported (months and months ago) that the Brits were the ones in back of the now-infamous Dossier framing President Trump for "Russian Collusion" and now --finally--- this basic truth is coming to light.

Even if I hadn't seen British fingerprints on it, I would have still assumed out of hand, sight unseen, no questions asked --- that the Brits were the ones at the bottom of it all. And I would have also guessed that they and their American pals were in fact the ones colluding with the Russians to sell out our Uranium. So guess what?

A few days ago it came out that the Italian Secret Service was supposed to be employed to plant emails and other material gleaned from Hillary Clinton onto Trump's computers, so as to make it look like he was the one colluding when in fact it was her behind it the whole time. Look a little further into the rabbit hole and what do you find? Oh, a New York-based FBI unit was in it up to their little pink whiskers. And under whose direction were they working? Oh, the Secret Service.

Goodness me, how it all comes around and around and around and always lands back on Britain. Always in the past fifty years that I can verify. It's as if everyone else stopped stirring the pot and just let them have at it.

And here's today's news from the Alt Media---which is the only media we have left:
https://phibetaiota.net/…/mongoose-theresa-may-fired-for-a…/

Those of you who have been reading a while will also remember that I told you it was the Russian Czar who sent his navy to intervene and stand between us and the British at the end of the Civil War. I mentioned it again just recently.

Russia has often been our friend and the Brits have often been our enemies, but somehow nobody notices these things because we are not thinking and looking at the facts in front of our faces. Nor are we trying hard enough to reason our way forward from the facts.

America has always been the death-knell of feudalism and monarchy.

Every American born on our land is a sovereign in their own right. 350 million of us, all equal to the Queen. Imagine how that went down the old pipes?

And it was bad news for the Pope, too. How could absolute Papal Supremacy be maintained in a world where average people, even low-life dirty American Commoners without a shred of culture, could aspire to rule their own lives, consult their own conscience, and own their own property?

This is self-evidently why, in 1822, the then-Pope and the then-British Monarch authored and signed The Secret Treaty of Verona, admitting that our form of government was antithetical to their form of government, and agreeing secretly to undermine us in Breach of Trust.

They've been at it ever since.
They co-sponsored the Civil War. They engineered the substitution of British Territorial States of States for American States of States. They picked and chose the Presidents from Whitehall. They lapped up the cream of their perfidy. They stuck a straw in America and sucked us dry and used us as unbelievably cheap mercenaries in endless wars for profit. And they did it all behind such a nice facade that nearly everyone was content to blame all the war-mongering and evil-doing on "the Americans, the Americans, the Americans...."
Right.

They have also sought to make the Chinese and the Russians into our enemies, when in fact, neither one have been. The Chinese just want to have reliable trading partners who pay their bills. The Russians want to have peace, free markets and economic opportunities for themselves. There is nothing about our Sino-Russian relationship that is hard to observe or explain....except, why should we be enemies with them?

To put it flatly and in a nutshell --- because the Queen and the Pope want it that way.

The Chinese and Russian Communists are in fact closer in sympathy to the American Dream than the European Monarchists could ever be.
They enshrine the Worker and we enshrine the Common Man. We are not that far apart in our egalitarian attitudes. They simply focus on the group while we focus on the individual. At least we are in the same sector of the Human Values galaxy.

If we became friends and Allies with the Russians and Chinese, that would be the end of the Spiderweb in Europe, and the end of the ability of the Queen and the Pope to use America and Americans as the Bulwark for their own monopoly interests.

They'd have to pay for their own defense. They'd have to come out of the shadows and stop pretending that "the Americans" are the aggressors and bullies. They'd have to take their greasy paws off of Africa and stop meddling in the Middle East.
It would be a whole new world.

Interfering in the American elections is the least of it. They have been interfering with and funding and manipulating and hand-choosing the Electors in every election for decades. That's a no-brainer and not even worth discussing.

What should be more "newsworthy" is the fact that they have been running a de facto government on our shores in Breach of Trust for a 150 years.

It's not just the elections, folks. It's the whole Shizzam. It's the two party system. It's the Democrats and the Republicans. It's the whole concept of having two groups of lobbyists in Washington, DC, fighting over the spoils and handing off large chunks of the profits to the Pope and the Queen. It's everything we have taken for granted and "trusted" and not questioned.

Daylight in the Swamp!

---

The Privy Council Controls the U.S.A. ~ American Intelligence Media

http://youtu.be/aHL3LA8VDyk

https://youtu.be/aHL3LA8VDyk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

The Privy Council Controls the U.S.A. ~ American Intelligence Media

---

The U.S. District Court vs The District Court of the United States

The U.S. Army vs The Army of the United States

What you control belongs to you. If one name doesn't fit choose another one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

The Privy Council Controls the U.S.A. ~ American Intelligence Media

https://youtu.be/aHL3LA8VDyk

---

Looking back and knowing what I do, these guys are still running cover for the Jews.

The Jesuits did it. LOL BS BS BS.

The Jews did it and are still doing it.

Yes they did a good job, while covering for the Jews.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

Looking back and knowing what I do, these guys are still running cover for the Jews.

The Jesuits did it. LOL BS BS BS.

The Jews did it and are still doing it.

Yes they did a good job, while covering for the Jews.

---

I saw that also

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

Professional Disruptors

I found out that Kevin Cote joined the Arizona Assembly. So far he has created similar trouble in Georgia with the Continental Marshals, in Utah with the Militia, in Florida with the Assembly, and now this.

His sidekick is a big, blustery guy who comes on as very patriotic and always skating the edge with skirmishes with the law. He never keeps the same name, but he keeps appearing like a character in a play. I have reason to think that "Nate" is also known as Jim Garinger and as Michael R. Hamilton-- the Svengali responsible for the Colorado Nine going off-track.

The Modus Operandi is always the same--- introduce False Narratives and collect information and form little cliques based on "concerns" promoted by the False Narratives.

Pretty soon everyone is looking over their back and doesn't know what to think or who to trust.

In Georgia, Kevin and his pal accused Chief Marshal Heywood of petty theft, and even though she kept excellent records and fully accounted for the circumstance, Kevin and his Pal wouldn't give up their False Narrative. They continued to harp on this completely petty and mistaken "concern" until the entire local organization was in an uproar over nothing.
And here we are again.

I don't know who these guys really are but this is the fourth time they have come in and harmed our organizations and caused exactly this kind of disruption.

Likewise, I don't know "for sure" who they are working for, either. Could be old DOD hacks, could be some other species of Federal Agent-- which is most likely, or they could be working for someone like George Soros. Someone with deep pockets is funding all their travel and relocation costs.

It doesn't really matter who they are working for. What matters is that we all wise up and put a stop to their disruption of our work.

Anyone who has a photo of Kevin Cote, please send to me for posting in our Rogue's Gallery. Also, since his Big Guy sidekick changes his name from Michael to Jim to James to Frank to..... if it is apparent by association with Kevin who I am talking about, and you have a photo of him, send it along.

From now on, Coordinators especially need to be aware of Kevin Cote and his Pal and alert me if they show up pretending to be from California next week.

There is also a shadowy woman involved in their little group of Disruptors. We don't have much on her but if Kevin or What's His Name has a wife --and you have a photo, send that one to me, too.

Four times, four States, four important efforts quashed. It's time we reversed the score.

I am sorry they targeted PaperUpNow, but its predictable enough that they would.

If you suspect that your Assembly is being impacted by such Provocateurs, just look for the telltale signs:
1. Gossip
2. People raising "concerns" of a juvenile or petty nature
3. Using such "concerns" to spread doubt and mistrust of leadership figures or functions within the group
4. Miscommunication between working groups and members -- for example, everyone but two people on an email list get an email, but two get dropped for no apparent reason
5. Paranoia and unnecessary talk about fear and danger
6. Petty or vague accusations of wrong-doing
7. Passive aggressive behavior -- the people making these vague accusations hang back and won't actually address the person they are accusing.

Example: a member moved across the State line four years ago and is now, legitimately, a Texan, even though they still have a business in Oklahoma where they receive some of their mail. People notice this and start asking questions among themselves instead of going directly to the man involved. Rumors fly. Completely unjust and unnecessary damage is done.

A normal State Assembly conducts its affairs in a mature and business-like way. There is no "cloak and dagger" atmosphere at all. Any questions are addressed in a forthright manner and resolved. A positive atmosphere and clear simple goals are maintained.

Right now, we are focused on educating people and helping them correct their political status records and getting ready to address economic issues--- reclaiming property and credit we are owed, obtaining relief from foreign taxation, and similar matters of mutual concern.

We have thoroughly researched the history and the law and we are standing on solid ground. We are peaceful and determined to restore our lawful government and so long as we stay in our proper jurisdiction and act in our proper capacity, we have nothing to fear.

Please note that Professional Disruptors use "spoofing" to introduce false communications in support of their False Narratives. As a result, you might receive an email from "me" that I never sent and know nothing about, and vice versa.

This sets up a situation where you are responding back to me concerning an email I know nothing about, or vice versa, and the confusion factor goes up by a factor of ten.

In this most recent round I received an email attachment that should have been a simple one page sample letter. Closer examination revealed that it was a "scrolling document"-- set up so that the same attachment could contain multiple variations of the same or different documents.

This is used in phishing scams to generate more leads but it can also be used to royally confuse communications, as one member of a group is working on Page A and another member is working on Page B and another is working on Page C. and nobody knows that they have all been given different documents, and so, are responding to different information.

This is more proof that the Arizona Assembly was targeted and it is best for everyone to be aware of what is going on and what to look for.

The most obvious "fruit" of Professional Disruptors is doubt and confusion and petty gossip. Instead of things being business-like and adult, you feel like you are back in Seventh Grade and Bobby just broke up with Suzie.

This has happened four times in four different States and the common factor is Kevin Cote.
Meantime....

I am happy to report that the Arizona Assembly has gotten back on track and is holding its regular meetings.

We are picking up the pieces of the most recent debacle and planning to have something better organized to expedite the whole status correction process to offer in the near future.

So. Adieu and farewell to this unfortunate chapter. We are sadder but wiser. If Kevin or his Pal or someone like them shows up in Nevada or California or Maine next week and starts causing trouble--you will know them by their "fruits".

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

State Assemblies and Jural Assemblies

We are forming State Assemblies and Jural Assemblies are part of State Assemblies. Our right to assemble and to execute the Jural duties as well as all other duties of self-governance are based on The Declaration of Independence and agreed upon and confirmed by all three Federal Constitutions.
And that's an end to that.

There is a group of unnamed people going around like Chicken Little claiming that we do not have the right to form our own courts and execute justice in our own country and that Jural Assemblies are dangerous.

My response is that this is only true if those founding and operating Jural Assemblies are doing so without the proper standing and knowledge-- which is like everything else, a challenge to us all to rebuild and restore.

This ill-informed and quite possibly self-interested rumor (consider the likely sources) is very easily disproven by the fact that we Americans had our own independent courts and form of Common Law for two centuries prior to the adoption of any Federal Constitution and have remained fully competent at all times prior and since.

There is also considerable confusion about the difference between "Jural Assemblies" which give rise to Land Jursdiction Courts and Jural Societies which give rise to Sea Jurisdiction Courts.

Obviously, our States as sovereign entities can form either kind of Jural Body, but the Constitutional Agreements limit our Sea Jurisdiction Courts to address only those powers that were not Delegated and which are covered by Amendment X.

Thus the actual States have limited use for Jural Societies and have traditionally focused on Jural Assemblies that support the Land Jurisdiction Courts as organizations that derive from the State Assembly for the special purpose of organizing our court system in the same way that the militia of each State is formed as an adjunct organization operating under the State Assembly as a whole.

There is no mystery about this, no cause for alarm or misgivings or fear-mongering about anything The American States Assembly is doing and anyone who says otherwise is either (a) misinformed or (b) deliberately trying to mislead people and cause trouble.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

unnamed people going around like Chicken Little claiming that we do not have the right to form our own courts and execute justice in our own country and that Jural Assemblies are dangerous.

---

Certainly you have every right to join any group you would like to join. But if you do so carrying with you the same concepts don't be really surprised if the outcome 50 years from now is identical to your present day situation that led you to conceive and join such a group.

You have more authority as an individual than as a committee. If you want change just DO IT! You don't need anybodies permission to change. And you only give other people authority over you when you acknowledge that authority. Otherwise what you are complaining about is a paper tiger .... it lacks existence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

Certainly you have every right to join any group you would like to join. But if you do so carrying with you the same concepts don't be really surprised if the outcome 50 years from now is identical to your present day situation that led you to conceive and join such a group.

You have more authority as an individual than as a committee. If you want change just DO IT! You don't need anybodies permission to change. And you only give other people authority over you when you acknowledge that authority. Otherwise what you are complaining about is a paper tiger .... it lacks existence.

---

Assembly's of one. Now that is a thing to consider.

So how does a trial by a jury of your peers work in your assembly?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

how does a trial by a jury of your peers work in your assembly?

---

I have few equals and absolutely no peers.

Quote:

---

peer (n.)
c. 1300, "an equal in rank or status" (early 13c. in Anglo-Latin), from Anglo-French peir, Old French per (10c.), from Latin par "equal" (see par (n.)). Sense of "a noble" (late 14c.) is from Charlemagne's Twelve Peers in the old romances, who, like the Arthurian knights of the Round Table, originally were so called because all were equal. Sociological sense of "one of the same age group or social set" is from 1944. Peer review attested by 1970. Peer pressure is first recorded 1971.

---

When the bailiff sings out "ALL RISE" I remain seated ... I am not ALL and am not even VERY MANY. All evidence suggests that he isn't addressing me.

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

Kevin Cote's Story

Shortly after I published about Kevin Cote, I got the following response from a reader in New York:
“I’m writing because I think you might be wrong about Kevin Cote ….
…. I live on Long Island in New York. Kevin Cote lived upstate New York with his wife and granddaughter ….

…..I think something bad happened to him because all of a sudden he was gone from FB and I asked that XXXXXXXX person if she knew what happened to him because I knew he and her had been communicating, and she told me his family had been threatened so he had to go into hiding and lay low to protect them.”

This is the classic story of how good men get entrapped and forced to serve the criminals. It nearly always happens this way. They get into some trouble with the legal system or their families are threatened, and they are forced/coerced and plea-bargained into serving as Snitches or worse.

Because they are good men to begin with and are being forced to serve as Tools, they still come across as good men. That’s what makes them believable and garners our sympathy.

It’s also what makes them dangerous. We trust them, because in the past, in better days, they were trustworthy. Now they are not.

This corruption of people is part of the corruption of the government and the banks and the churches and nearly everything else around us.
To overcome it requires great courage and determination and not a little watchful discernment.

How is it possible that Kevin, a New Yorker, insinuated himself into State organizations in Florida, Georgia, Utah, and Arizona? How did he qualify or appear to qualify as an Arizonan? And get an insider seat on the Arizona State Assembly? Hmm?

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Flag With Blue Stripes?

This is what they are trying to get away with. They want to turn our country from being a country into being a corporation existing only in the jurisdiction of the air and the sea. So much easier for them, if they don't have to deal with flesh and blood: you can rape, murder, pillage, torture, and otherwise destroy a "corporation" because a corporation only exists on paper.

The fact that a living man or woman is presumed to be chattel owned by a corporation in their System, is just more of the fun from the perspective of the madmen and madwomen responsible for all this criminality. Then the assets of living people can be salvaged or impounded or whatever else the vermin responsible for this outrage conceive of and we are all reduced to being nothing but bar-coded animals in a stockyard.

Those who are so eagerly promoting this don't realize that what they do to others will literally also be done unto them.

Those who are disgracing our flag in the name of Corporate Feudalism don't really understand what they are doing, either. They think it is "revolutionary" and a political statement and that it stands for a new government--- but in fact, it's just the ongoing attempt of the nasty de facto government we've had for the past 150 years to officially entrench itself and devour what is left of human decency.

Corporations are not competent to serve as governments, because they have only one purpose: profit. And they will profit themselves at the cost of everyone and everything else like a giant eating machine that does nothing but consume twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.

For this reason, corporations are supposed to be subservient to government, instead of "acting as" governments. If the politicians have any sense, they will start pulling strings and plugs like mad, and liquidate these monsters before they are themselves rendered obsolete.

Think about it. The corporate bosses need someone to blame. They will happily sacrifice all their henchmen once they are no longer needed, and that hour is just about here.

Put on a Big Show, trot out the 100,000 indictments, have lots of show trials, execute a lot of Third Stringers nobody ever heard of. Blame them. Who cares?

Change the colors of the flag and you change the nature of the government and the world---- but not in a good way, not for the good of Mankind. So, stand by Old Glory. Those red stripes stand for the blood in your veins and the white stripes stand for the soul in your body.

Blue stripes stand for Corporate Feudalism on steroids, and for you and yours, stripped naked and wearing a plastic ear-tag.

Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·

Dear Mr. Trump-- May 29th, 2019


You may consider this an Order from the Civilian Government of this country, requesting and requiring that you impose command and control over the Internal Revenue Service and the US Treasury Department and the US Department of the Treasury and all their little private bill collectors nationwide, including something calling itself the "Tax Processing Center" with no address at all, but the name of the town or city, for example: "Tax Processing Center, Big Lake, Alaska".

Their practice of making up new variations of NAMES for people and attaching these "gifts" to us and our assets as a means of asserting new False Claims is nothing but fraud and harassment and it needs to be stopped. Now. Yesterday. Last week. Last year. Ten years ago. Or, as in my case, over twenty years ago, when I gave the Internal Revenue Service/IRS Notice of Revocation.


Yes, Mr. Trump, I "retired" and formally expatriated from any Territorial or Municipal Citizenship obligation, and I fully informed the State Department, returned the ACCOUNTS to Mr. Mnuchin's Fiduciary Responsibility, and wiped my hands a long time ago. Not only that, I seized ownership interest and control of all my names, all my Names, and all my NAMES --- in all variations, permutations, styles, punctuations, and orderings whatsoever, and returned them all to their natural permanent domicile on the land and soil of Wisconsin, the Federation Compact State where I was born

All these records are Public. All of them have been duly recorded.
So what do your feckless subcontractors do, but try to create yet another variation of one of my names using a tiny little change in punctuation (which, however, I have also already claimed as my property and placed on the Public Record) and use that as a means to assert False Claims in Commerce and also in International Trade against me and my assets in the world of fact.


What is there about that little word, "No" and the fact that "No means no." are the adult members of your Administration not getting?


All your Buddies work for me, even if the Queen or the Pope pays their wages. I am not pleased whatsoever by the continued mis-administration of the Federal Taxing Authority and the gross frauds and racketeering taking place on our shores.


Millions of Americans are being harassed for no sane reason. Millions, Mr. Trump. What you need to do is admit the circumstance. Just admit it. Your "National Debt" is our National Credit. As we access our credit, that will pay down your debt. Inform your other creditors that the American People showed up at the last minute, back from oversees, hungry, foot-sore, and not at all happy with what has gone on here.


I suggest that you pick up Charles Rettig by both ears and send him packing before I do. We are not franchises of the Municipal Government. We are not Paupers. We are not Employees nor Dependents of the Federal Government. We are not Withholding Agents. Not Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marines. We are not Voluntary Franchisees. We are not United States Citizens. We are not Citizens of the United States. We are not Dependents. Not, not, not.


It is only going to shine a much brighter light on the corruption of the corporations involved if you do not order an end to the fraudulent impersonation and racketeering committed by these private "Bureaus". So, do what has to be done to shut these malfunctioning agencies down and re-task and retrain them to make sure that Americans have access to their National Credit.


We are charging a trillion dollars per head as valued today and ever afterward for every American who dies or is maimed or otherwise significantly harmed in any altercation arising from any forced conscription or confiscation of land jurisdiction assets by any incorporated entity including the IRS and the Internal Revenue Service and The United States Department of the Treasury and the Department of the United States Treasury and the US Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Federal Taxation and the Tax Processing Centers and all the Municipal Government goons posing as REVENUE OFFICERS. They all need to be re-tasked and right about now.


We realize the consternation that this demand places upon all the other Creditors, but the fact remains that we are your Priority Creditors as well as the Priority Creditors of the United States and compared to what both the Queen and Pope owe to us, all the rest is chicken change. It's time for them and all the actual corporations --- not the "PERSONAL" corporations that have been created in Bad Faith and Fraud -- to pay for their sins and for our Credit to be redeemed. Worldwide.


Remind the Pope of the Double Golden Jubilee and what is actually required of him, both as Pope and as Roman Pontiff. Tell him I said so and so did Mother Mary. Those roses I received are to be delivered.


And as for Mr. Barr, I like him, but his Office is all messed up, too. We are owed the return of all our land jurisdiction assets. Mr. Barr has inherited the job of the Alien Property Custodian and that's our property he is still holding. It all belongs to the American States and People and we are the only American States and Nations that have the provenance, standing, and treaties to inherit. We are the only "People" left alive and in possession. So return what is owed to The United States of America (Unincorporated) to us. Collapse the trusts and the titles back to the States and the People. That is the only sane and proper solution to this debacle.


Please tell the Queen that for me, too.
We aren't going to stand here and let Secondary Creditors prey upon us under False Pretenses. The jig is up. The fraud is known. And at a trillion dollars a head, those promoting these outrages on our soil are not likely to secure any profit from their actions. So please pass that posted charge on to the Bilderburgers, too? All the land assets belong to us and we shall charge them all up the wazoo if they do anything but return our assets unharmed, debt free, and unencumbered.


Most sincerely,
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

Anna von Reitz
2 mins ·

The Two Deals -- Not Just the New Deal

Let's go on the record here that I like Jim McBride and regard him as one of those people on Earth who has contributed mightily to the Cause. It's also true that he shared his research about the "sole relief and remedy" being offered by the Municipal United States and in general by the Territorial Government (two years ago already) -- but here's the thing.... and maybe he will read this and respond.

When I look at the history and read the documents, especially those concerning Roosevelt and the "New Deal" and the Conference of Governors and its actions "pledging" the good faith and credit of "their states and the citizenry" thereof --- it's apparent that they were talking about their Territorial States of States and the States of States "citizenry" --- meaning those relatively few people who actually were United States Citizens. Not American State Citizens.

They gave their all-----all 1 in 1550 of us. And it didn't hurt them much, as most of them were ineligible to act as American State Citizens in the first place.

What they did was provide an excuse for a "legal presumption" that all the rest of the people in every State were similarly "pledged" and by a process of constructive fraud, undisclosed contracts, and semantic deceits, those responsible unlawfully converted the estates of millions of Americans into their "Public Charitable Trust" scheme "as if" they were actual United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States when they were never either one and never "volunteered" and never "donated" their children or their earnings, either.

It was a giant constructive fraud and identity theft and impersonation scheme, pure and simple.

Now, if we go back in as the Undeclared Heirs we admit that we are the Progeny of the United States Citizens who were pledged by the Conference of Governors on March 6, 1933, and subjected under the ancient Feudal System of pledging to the Queen--- that is, if we do as Jim suggests without first reclaiming our Lawful Persons as American State Citizens, we have no other recourse: we have "voluntarily" identified ourselves as British Territorial Subjects owed restitution under the quid pro quos of the New Deal. This then means that we cannot receive remedy as Americans.

There is a large amount of money to be shared out of the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) which is meant to provide welfare benefits to the destitute Paupers among us --- and most of that money shouldn't be there, because it was obtained by constructive fraud --- and there again, we are admitting to be "Paupers" if we accept "benefits" or payouts from the liquidation of the Public Charitable Trust. So strike one -- admission of being British Territorial Citizens, and strike two-- admission of being Paupers.

Some people don't care, they just want a lot of credit to spend, regardless of where it came from or how it was obtained or what you have to admit about yourself to get a share of it, but to me--- there are numerous unanswered questions and people taking advantage of this option should at least think through the pros and cons of it as it relates to their own circumstance and they should have full disclosure before making such a decision.

The Public Charitable Trust was set up in the wake of The American Civil War as a welfare fund for displaced plantation workers and their families to help former slaves survive the bumpy transition to freedom. That is still the basic premise of the Public Charitable Trust, in that it is supposed to go to poor people in hard circumstances to pay for things like catastrophic medical bills and emergency shelter and travel money to get them back home when they have wound up in a place and can't get home. Now they are liquidating this trust as part of the General Bankruptcy of the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia.

This is what --- according to my understanding of the situation --- you are getting a share of, when you apply (there's that word again) under provisions of the sections of Title 50 that Jim's claims are under. Well, someone should claim it, and that's no lie. I tend to think that the people who should claim it are the actual United States Citizens and especially the Colored United States Citizens. It seems somehow as if we would be coming in and claiming something from the mouths of people who struggled and suffered without recourse for it--- even though, to be sure, many of us and our parents and grandparents, too, were among the sufferers.

I just can't see myself as a Brit nor as a Pauper, and I certainly am not a "Person of Color", so all those factors enter in to the questions I have about Jim's claims under Title 50, subsection (b). I also wonder what happens when the fraud issues are fully entertained --- as they must be, since there is no statute of limitation on fraud claims and as probate of estates is never really closed. At least a significant portion of the money and credit represented by the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) was purloined under conditions of constructive fraud, and shouldn't be in that Trust at all. What then, when the actual Heirs come forward and say---- hey, wait a minute, my Grandfather wasn't black, wasn't a United States Citizen, and wasn't a Pauper, either. What in the Name of Glory are you talking about?

What are the Bankruptcy Trustees going to do then? Run screaming into the bushes? And what happens to all those people who came forward and made these claims who aren't really United States Citizens, aren't Paupers, aren't Colored and......? Well, you see where this line of questioning is going. What if we are asked to pay the credit back, basically because we are making a fraudulent claim on the basis of being defrauded ourselves or fraud committed against our parents and grandparents?

This gets very convoluted and I am not sure what the answers are. I am not a believer in creating another injustice as an answer to an earlier injustice, and I certainly don't want people to get a chunk of credit, spend it, and then out of the blue be forced to pay it back. These are the kinds of issues and questions that I still have, and foolish or not, I still feel that "nagging sense" that perhaps I am being offered a proverbial bowl of porridge, and not even a bowl of porridge ever intended for me.

I would somehow feel bad pretending to be a British Pauper and taking advantage, when I know of many, many people out there who really are struggling to put food on the table and heat in the house and shoes on the feet of their children. I am not suggesting that Jim is immoral or that he means any ill in anything he is doing, these are just unresolved gut-level issues and questions that I have. Someone is owed that credit and it certainly should be claimed. My problem is that I don't know if it should be claimed by me or most of those reading my articles.

What after all, does it really mean? If I admit that I am now or ever truly was a British Territorial Citizen and a Pauper in the Commonwealth that automatically forestalls any claim I can make to the land and soil I am heir to as an American State Citizen.

And the land and soil is there to be claimed, too, as a result of other frauds and schemes that went on before the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration, and which in fact took place during the Administration of his Cousin, Theodore Roosevelt.

It's the reclaiming of the land --- the actual and factual world -- that I care about and value, and upon which all our lives and well-being depend. Money and credit are as nothing compared to the value of the land and the soil, the reality which gives money and credit any meaning.

Rather than endanger or muddy my claim to the land and soil, I would gladly forego any other claim, because as long as I have the land and soil, I have the basis of all wealth and happiness and security. I have the ground solid under my feet, and on that solid foundation, I can build a new world. And while the money and the credit may fail, the land and soil endure.

Thus I may be less than sophisticated, yet in my own way, wise in bringing forward the claim to the land and soil as an American State National --- one of the lowly People of this country who are owed the return of all title, all right, and all interest in the land and soil of this country..

Perhaps Jim would be kind enough to share the affidavit and let me see what is required? It's possible that my fears are groundless and that having once regained our Lawful Personhood no such concerns are valid. Maybe we can have our cake and eat it, too. That would be nice and I would have nothing against it.

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Lawful Military Service v. Legal Military Service

The basic issue is very similar, if not quite the same, as the difference between acting as a peacekeeping official versus a law enforcement officer. In one capacity, you are acting lawfully and in the other you are acting legally.

The activities appear very similar, but are fundamentally different because they are being engaged in under totally different premises and different forms of law and different jurisdictions.

The Lawful Soldiery of a nation, which includes a Lawful Navy and Lawful Air Force, operates under the Geneva Conventions. A Legal Soldiery by contrast is a private Mercenary Force and operates under the Hague Conventions.

Through no fault of their own, our honorable men and women in the Armed Services of the United States, have been forced to act as Mercenaries for hire ever since the Civil War. This is why they and their activities fall almost exclusively under the provisions of the Hague Conventions which were in fact developed out of the Lieber Code adopted by Abraham Lincoln and imposed upon our troops as General Order 100, the very first Executive Order ever in the history of this country.

When a Lawful Soldiery goes to war, it is an officially Declared War among nations. When a Legal Soldiery goes to war, the "war" may be declared or not, and may be engaged in as guerrilla warfare and include aims and activities that are not normally allowed by the Lawful Soldiery.

The employment of Mercenaries --- also known as Crown Pirates, Privateers, or Soldiers of Fortune for Hire --- has gone on since ancient times.

The history buffs among us will remember that King George III hired German Mercenaries from the Principality of Hesse --- Hessians. It was a contingent of Hessian troops that were the target when Washington crossed the Delaware. These men were sold into a form of slavery by their government. Instead of being Free Agents and selling their services as soldiers on the open market, they were conscripted against their will and used as gun fodder, with the proceeds being collected by their local tyrant, the Grand Duke of Hesse.

The same thing has happened to millions of Americans. Our boys and girls have been sold as cheap mercenaries and the proceeds collected by the "US Government" ---- which by now we have all learned, is a foreign entity on our shores, albeit, under constitutional contract to serve and defend our States of the Union.

The Draft enforced during World War II, Korea, and Vietnam was exactly the same kind of conscription forced upon the Hessian soldiers--- we just didn't know it. It was based on the "presumption" that the men and women serving in these conflicts were all "voluntarily" and knowledgeably adopting United States Citizenship, which in itself was a crock.

Just as FDR conveniently forgot to inform us all that our sons and daughters were being used as cheap commercial mercenaries, the following Administration didn't inform us (or them) that in order to ever come home again, they would have to expatriate from the presumption of United States Citizenship and that they would have to expatriate in order to receive the actual benefits of their Service, which were supposed to include lavish stock portfolios, freedom, and their Constitutional guarantees.

Some men, notably corrupt Generals and General Staff, made out like bandits during World War II, Korea, and Vietnam-- and retired into lives of luxury because they expatriated back to their original birthright political status and collected on those stock portfolios, all nicely plumped up as a result of wartime demand for corporate goods and services.

The rest of us got the G.I. Bill and never came home from Foreign Service because nobody told the troops that they had to expatriate from the status of "United States Citizenship". So they and their children and their grandchildren remained on the record as slaves owned by the Federal United States, subject to the whims of the Queen and the Pope's Municipal Congress, and their stock portfolios remained "unclaimed", in the care of military bankers who managed these stock portfolios "for" the victims of this scheme.

Does someone need to pay for all this fraud against the American States and People? Yes. Their names are Francis and Elizabeth. But we must all admit that they can never, ever repay what they owe us. They can never give back the lives lost and destroyed, the families cheated, the time on Earth that could have been so much different and better.

What we can do is wake up and smell the java. Especially, the military can wake up and smell the java: you are being used as cheap mercenaries in wars for profit, your political status is being damaged and misrepresented, your country is being endangered by this ongoing fraud and malfeasance, you and your families are being surreptitiously and fraudulently enslaved, and at the end of the day, you are being cheated out of investments -- stocks and bonds -- that are owed to you.

Who knew?
Quote Benedict XVI in a high-pitched wail: "Nobody told me!"

Well, now that you know, what are we going to do about it? Even the lowliest Buck Private who served in World War II is richer than Midas on paper. And most of them and all the other G.I.s are struggling to get basic services out of the Veterans Administration. Does that make sense to you?

Most of them still don't know that they aren't naturally "United States Citizens" and that they need to expatriate from any such status the moment they leave the Service, and that if they don't do this, they are permanently deprived of the freedom they fought for and which they deserve, as well as the Lion's Share of benefits they are owed from these filthy corporations and also denied their Constitutionally guaranteed rights as Americans.

The members of Congress, at least some of whom have known about and profited from this travesty all along, have smiled and kept mum and spent the proceeds. Let's all remember John McCain and the two-week long spectacle of his unending funeral. And let's all take comfort that, at least, it was a funeral.

The return of America as its own country, no longer in the thrall of foreign corporations, and the return of our Armed Forces to the status of a Lawful Soldiery, is long overdue. So are the benefits owed to all those who were mis-characterized as "United States Citizens" long overdue.

For starters, reclaim your birthright political status. Re-convey your Good Name back the land and soil of your birth State. Formally expatriate from any presumption of Territorial or Municipal United States Citizenship. If you are a veteran, send the head of your branch of service an informative letter telling him or her that you have elected to return to your birthright political status and have expatriated and retired from any further presumption of United States Citizenship. You will, however, continue to collect all earned benefits and maintain your Honorable Discharge.

There was an effort to conscript more volunteers from the general populace by establishing and alleging that a "civilian military service component" exists, for which we recommend sending a DD 2168, also. The object of applying for benefits that you obviously don't qualify for, is to get an official response admitting that you are not part of any such "civilian military service component" and therefore not obligated in any way in your civilian life to military discipline or United States Citizenship. This is one instance where we want our applications to be denied.

Lately, we've been seeing numerous cases where military records have been altered, always to the detriment of the men involved.
In one case, a 20 year veteran of the Navy Seals came up totally missing from the military records. Poof! His entire career in the military disappeared without a trace and he was being denied service from the VA. Luckily, his deceased wife had kept his records faithfully and his son still had them.

In another case, another Seal's Death Certificate came up with the box for "Military Veteran" checked "No".

In a third case, a Seal's Service Record was altered to show completely different duty stations, history, and educational components--- all serving to downgrade his rank and the amount of his military retirement.

For whatever reason, it appears to be Open Season on Navy Seals' records and if you or anyone else you know is a former Seal, we suggest making sure that your service records are secure and it might be a good idea to request new copies. See if your information is correct --- and still on file.

It's good advice for anyone retired from any branch of the US Military to make sure that your records are secure. What they owe you is one of the more significant portions of their National Debt, and there is growing anecdotal evidence that in addition to cheating veterans out of freedom, political status, and pay and benefits they are owed, their military records are being altered and "lost".

If they were ever actually employed by the US Corporations in an "official capacity" as professional Lawful Soldiery there is considerably less likelihood of these sorts of things occurring, but as it stands, most US military veterans have never been part of any Lawful Soldiery, and were merely mercenaries employed in a private capacity by Foreign Corporations engaged in wars for profit.

Such corporations can and do go bankrupt and just as they are engaged in shady business on a global scale, they are not above bilking people out of retirement and pension benefits.

I know this is going to be shocking for many people to contemplate and yes, I expect considerable backlash from outraged veterans. It is indeed very disturbing, but also is self-evident when you are aware of the rest of the history involved. From the moment Abraham Lincoln ordered the initial attack of the Civil War, the United States Military has been acting as a Commercial Mercenary Force --- a legalized private military "Security Service" operated by commercial corporations on a "for hire" basis.

I guess the only other thing that can be said about this circumstance is that if we had known what was going on: (A) a lot less people would be veterans and (B) we would have charged a lot more for our services.

Please observe that an Airman First Class with two kids and a wife will have to apply for Food Stamps to survive, while his counterpart answering an ad in Soldier of Fortune Magazine stands to make $125,000 a year, plus perks.

It is instructive that when the Selective Service contacted my son and he said, "No thanks, I'm not adopting US Citizenship." their response was complete and utter shock and disbelief. The lady on the other end of the phone line didn't know what to do. She was reduced to stuttering, "But, but, but--- you have to sign up for Selective Service! Everyone does!"

Not everyone has to and not everyone does.

It took four increasingly strong letters refusing their "offers" and a dozen phone calls before they finally admitted that no, Selective Service is not mandatory for Americans.

I noticed my son was rather upset about the whole experience. In a different world, with a Lawful Soldiery to join, it would be a different thing. As it is, if he ever decides to seek employment as a mercenary, he'll get paid the going wage for it.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

"Tax Processing Centers" -- Public Warning Notice -- Demand for Action

The latest in a long line of Tax Frauds committed by the US Territorial and Municipal US "Government" corporations is on the way.

I am referring to the advent of "Tax Processing Centers" --- these bogus private operations are springing up all over the country and forewarned is forearmed.

What appears in your mail is one of those particularly irritating letters that are glued together around the edges and that you have to deconstruct very carefully to avoid tearing.

These missives are addressed to Municipal Public Transmitting Utilities --- names that appear in ALL CAPS --- and use what appear-to-be Middle Initials, but without a period to designate it as such.
Observe the form of the NAME: JOHN M DOE. The names being used now are also devoid of hyphens or other punctuation: LINDA A SMYTHE ANDERSON, instead of Linda A. Smythe-Anderson.

Their first dodge will be to announce that a "Federal" Tax Lien has been established on your property, usually at some time in the past. This will be big news to you and you will, of course, be frightened. When you run down to the Recording District you will find that yes, indeed, a mammoth Tax Lien has been filed against your property. And I do mean a Big tax lien --- often ten times the value of the property, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of "tax lien" that just appears out of the blue sky.

This is because the STATE OF COLORADO, for example, is being bankrupted as a franchise of the UNITED STATES, INC. and the UNITED STATES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. Instead of paying their taxes all these years, they have claimed exemption as a government entity, only to have it discovered that they were operating as commercial corporations and therefore not eligible for exemption.

Oh, my. So, their tax debts are being passed in domino fashion to their "presumed" Secondary Co-Signers --- JOHN M DOE and LINDA A SMYTHE ANDERSON.

None of this has anything to do with any American State National or American State Citizen, but we are being dunned just the same.

Your options are:
(A) join the party and file for bankruptcy protection along with the rest of the rats, submit yourself to the tender mercies of the bankruptcy court, have the black mark of bankruptcy against your name, and hope to survive with your home, $8000 worth of personal assets, and one car per family; or

(B) get on your broomstick and beat the politicians and the Queen and the Pope responsible for this situation with your pens and your law suits and your commercial claims until they decide that, perhaps, this isn't the way to do business after all. Scream bloody murder and share the news with everyone you know, or

(C) do what we have been telling you to do all along, and after you have joined your State Assembly, see your State Coordinator about National Credit Redemption.

In order to make their scheme "legal" they had to provide for remedy and we have found it. The bad news is that the system supporting the effort is so old, unkempt, secretive, and rickety that moths fly out of the record books and everything concerned with redeeming the credit we are owed is painfully slow. Think: sloths on vacation, even though, to be fair, the IRS workers in charge are slaving away and doing their best.

It is a priority assignment for everyone reading this to send letters to everyone they can think of involved in the Government Corporations --- "US" Senators, Congressmen, President Trump, the US Attorney General, the UN General Secretary, the Queen, the Pope, and everyone in between --- demanding a modern National Credit Redemption Program and a special Credit Card to be issued to qualified American State Nationals --- the only Parties to whom such Redemption is officially owed. This Card is to be used to pay off mortgages, tax debts, medical bills, college loans, auto loans, and utility bills.

Once issued, the Cards can be used by the State Coordinators and others to pay off these debts for friends, neighbors, and others in our communities who are in need regardless of their political status.

It's our Credit. Until the whole system is updated into the modern age, we are stuck using rubber stamps and registered mail and daily firefights with confused IRS Agents who know nothing --- absolutely nothing --- about the National Credit.

Those of us who have teeth are taking a bite out of the backsides of the perpetrators and demanding action and broad spectrum correction and are holding back our own claims to protect seniors and others who are losing their homes as a result of this impersonation fraud and the slower-than-molasses-in January response curve. Those in urgent need, need to come first. Those who aren't being billed yet need to stand down and hang on and tough it out until we prevail upon the perpetrators to modernize delivery and release the National Credit.

And everyone needs to "Bang a Gong" --- loudly enough that they can hear it in Whitehall and Saint Peters.

The next scam is a "Warrant of Distraint".
Now a "Distraint Warrant" (as opposed to a "Warrant of Distraint") is a peculiar warrant used in the United Kingdom for the collection of tax debts.

Are we in the United Kingdom?

No, didn't think so. And the rats in Whitehall who think we are in the United Kingdom need a fire lit under their tails to inform them that our generosity does not extend to "gifting" them with our continent and our National Credit.

What these scam artist Tax Processing Centers are sending out is a "Warrant of Distraint" --- a bogus "simulation of legal process" that so far as I know exists only in Montana and is enforceable only with respect to "County of ________" organizations.
Along with this completely horse-hockey Notice they announce their intention to levy your bank accounts and cause other trouble until the above referenced tax liens are paid in full. Oh, lovely. We have scam artists making up bogus tax liens and then going around to ignorant local banks and levying bank accounts based on this manure.

Everyone have your pitchforks and bonfires ready? See why the perpetrators needed 25,000 one gallon canisters of cyanide and 30,000 guillotines to kill their Priority Creditors? American Military, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mr. Trump..... UN Secretary General, Pope Francis, Lizzy?

If you don't want to be identified as the criminals in this story, you'd better get busy and release the $950 trillion in "Life Force Value Annuities" Prince Philip collected in Canada ---- most of which belongs to us, and you also need to start paying out the National Credit.

If you look at the Return Address for these "Tax Processing Centers" you will see that:
(1) there isn't a real Return Address. All it says is "Tax Processing Center" and then the name of your town and state. The only contact is a telephone number, and if you call it, a scam artist will be waiting on the other end, telling you how they are going to "help" you out of whatever they can skin you for.

(2) The Return Address does reveal (in tiny type) that it is for "Private Mail Only" --- it's not a government publication, it's not a government organization, it's a private commercial debt collection based on totally false presumptions being carried out by criminal subcontractors of the US Bankruptcy Trustees, and they all need to be arrested and have their rumps permanently resettled on their shoulders.

As I have said many times, this is not a matter of politics. It is a matter of crime. Those crimes include impersonation, kidnapping, unlawful conversion, constructive fraud, inland piracy, collusion, barratry, identity theft, collusion, false claims in commerce, credit fraud, press-ganging, conspiracy against the Constitutions, commandeering of Public Vessels, securities fraud, and more.

If the perps don't want to be permanently recognized as nothing but sleazy criminals and outlaws deserving a noose, it's well-past time that they took action and directed the enforcement of the actual Public Law we are owed and did their jobs to protect us.

They can begin with closing down the "Tax Processing Centers" and expediting the removal of all these fictitious "Tax Liens" and ceasing and desisting all other attempts to collect debts that don't exist. They can also shut down the "US Bankruptcy Trustees" on a permanent basis and nationalize the banks that have been colluding with this foreign agenda on our shores.

We call upon our traditional Allies and the People of the world to join in the Housecleaning that is so obviously required; let it be peaceful, effective, and understood by everyone involved.

If you receive one of these bogus letters, open it and copy its contents front and back, and take it to your local Sheriff and the Territorial State Police and the District Attorney and the State Attorney General and the Governor and whomever else you can contact and swear out a criminal complaint demanding that these "Centers" be located and the perpetrators arrested for violations including:
Combined MUNICIPAL and Territorial Notices
of Violation(s) and Failure(s) to Perform
NOTICE OF CLAIM of “sole relief and remedy” under Title 50 Section 7 (c) and (e) of 2012 and previous.
Notice of Violation of Lanham Act --- attempted attachment and seizure of Unregistered Trademarks; Title 15, Section 1125 (a)and 11.
Notice of Violation of Admiralty, Maritime and Prize Cases, Title 28, Section 1331 (1) and (2) and (12).
Notice of Violation of Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of the United States, Title 18 Section 7 (1), (3), (8) and (13).
Notice of Violation of The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of Title 39, Sections 1-908 and 3621-3591.
Notice of Violation by Presumption of the Public Vessels Act, 46 U.S.C.A. Appendix Sections 781-790 as originally enacted.
Notice of Violation of The False Claims Act, Title 31 U.S.C.A. Section 3729 (a) and (7).
Notice of Violation of The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Title 28, Sections 1602-1611.
Notice of Violation of the United States Statutes-at-Large, Title 12, Section 411.
Notice of Administrative Failure by the IRS/Internal Revenue Service for Failure to Produce Mutual Offset Credit Exchange Vouchers and Instructions, failure to validate Proof of Claim as required by the Administrative Procedures Act, failure to provide remedy required by the Emergency Banking Act, and the United States Statutes-at-Large.

The Scammers responsible may claim that you violated Federal Mail Statutes by opening mail that wasn't "really" addressed to you, but bear in mind, that the entity being addressed doesn't really exist, and if you have done your homework and have recorded your Certificate of Assumed Names, you have control of any and every Name or NAME associated with you and your assets, including any "permutation, ordering, variation, style, or punctuation" of your names.

Time to settle this, folks; dig down to the bottom of it and throw it back in the laps of the greedy criminals responsible.

Feel free to distribute this Public Warning Notice to all and any local, state, national, and international peacekeeping officials and law enforcement officers, all politicians, all corporate officers, all bank officers, all agencies including the IRS/Internal Revenue Service, and any actual news agencies in your communities.

White Hats --- land this one on the President's Desk.

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Please Inform Mike Pompeo

Dear Mr. Trump,

This is my second letter this week. I will make it very brief.

Please inform Mike Pompeo about the basic history of this country?

The entities "held in abeyance" after the Civil War were nothing but Federal Contractors, not the actual American Government.

We are still here. Still Texans. Still Wisconsinites. Still Montanans.
These are our nationalities. Our states are our nations.

We are not either species of "United States Citizen". We don't belong to the Queen, and neither are we "Citizens of the United States" --- not chattel properties of the Municipal Civil Government, either.

Our political status pre-dates the Constitutions.

Our Federation of States, The United States of America, is unincorporated and still in business.

And both the Queen and the Pope owe us Good Faith Service.

Thank you, very much.

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·

The Big Baloney -- QE II and Pope Francis -- My Humble Suggestion

This morning I was treated to a parody news story from newspunch.com, announcing that Queen Elizabeth is claiming to be the 43rd great-granddaughter of the Prophet Mohammed.

She is, according to their story, trying to convince the Muslim world that she is their rightful ruler, as part of a bid to usher in global Crown Rule and perk up the oil business.

It's bizarre enough to be true (not the claim to be the Prophet's progeny -- the news story) and it would neatly explain the proliferation of guillotines in America and the forced migration of Muslim people and the accompanying demands for Sharia Law.

The actual truth is that Queen Elizabeth is a criminal -- a proven criminal, and she needs to be arrested. If her own people won't do it, someone else will have to. And that will mean another bloody, senseless World War.

As a German by actual lineage, Elizabeth has about as much right to the Throne of Great Britain as I do. [I might have a little more claim than she does, because I have some Scottish Clan MacDonald blood flowing in my veins.]

So there is strike one.

She isn't a "Windsor" --- that's just an otherwise honorable name adopted because it slyly admits that she is the Prince of the Air's Purser. She occupies the same basic position as the French Payseur Family---"Wind-sur" like "Pay-sur". She's a military banker.

So there's strike two--- lying about her name and actual function.
And then there's the actual proof of criminality and Breach of Trust. In 2011 she was convicted of: (1) not having been actually seated on the Throne and (2) breaking her Coronation Oath, by a British Jury.
http://mtrial.org
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/
http://jforjustice.co.uk/77/

This is the John Anthony Hill [JAH] Case. She was tried. She was convicted by a jury in a British Court. Fair and square.

There you have strike three.
There can be no doubt that Queen Elizabeth II is in fact impersonating the Queen of Britain and has been doing so for many years.

If you could do that, why not claim to be the 43rd great-granddaughter of the Prophet Mohammed?

Interestingly, not only is Elizabeth impersonating the Queen of Great Britain, the substance of all her crimes against us and against many other people, is a form of impersonation, too.

Enfranchisement is a form of impersonation. You take a living man and you redefine him as a franchise corporation, a thing.
When goaded to arrest her, the excuses and howling from Parliament and the Privy Council amount to, "But, but.... if we did that, all the laws bearing her signature would be invalid..... if we did that, there would be no lawful Succession (there isn't anyway, but so what?)....if we did that....." And then there's, "But she is so old.....why not just let Nature take its course? Not cause any disruption of the government....."

Given her family history, she could last another fifteen years and hope to convince us all that she's Mohammed's 43rd Great-Granddaughter.

And go on signing invalid legislation affecting all her phony franchises the whole while.

It appears that the British Parliament is afflicted with the same mental illness and dearth of common sense that afflicts the "US" Congress.
They know that no law or treaty she has ever signed has any validity. They know that she is not actually the Queen and that any contract or covenant she had with the British People was severed within three days after her Coronation. They've all known that for eight (8) years, full on, in their faces, undeniable.

I guess they hope that the rest of us won't notice, but we have.
If the Queen isn't the Queen, there is no valid power of enforcement behind the British Courts, including the British Territorial Courts.
Quite simply, they have no lawful or legal authority to say or do jack-diddly.

They are all caught in a nasty double-bind. If they go backward and re-instate the Land Law, which is what they should do, they will all be condemned to death under it. Yet, there has to be some kind of law or society will devolve into chaos. Enter Sharia. But even an idiot knows that isn't going to wash.

Every idiot, that is, but those in the British Parliament and Nancy Pelosi.

And while we are on that topic.... the Queen isn't the Queen, and the Pope isn't the Pope, either.

Francis is a Jesuit. Jesuits take a lifetime vow to serve the Pope. So it follows that a Jesuit can never be the Pope. Even a Lutheran knows that. So what is going on?

Every Pope since the first Pope has worn two hats.
He wears the Sacred Office of the Pope, and the Secular Office of the Roman Pontiff. All this was inherited at the Council of Nicea from the Roman Emperor, Constantine, and consolidated in 800 A.D. under Charlemagne.

So Benedict XVI, feeling himself too old to deal with the rigors of the Secular Office, turned to his loyal foot soldiers, the Jesuits, and chose one to take on the job of Roman Pontiff, while he, himself, openly retained the "ministerial office".

In other words, Benedict XVI, Pope Emeritus, is still the Pope. Francis is serving him as a loyal Jesuit, doing what he is told to do --- which is basically to circle the wagons to protect the Church's interests and "act as Pope" while taking on the burden of the Secular Office.

So he is impersonating the Pope just as Elizabeth is impersonating the Queen.

We are dealing with Magicians, Con Men, and Bad Actors. This is the Evil in High Places the Bible speaks of, and it is essentially the Sin of Moses coming home to roost.

The True God gave us Ten Commandments, knowing that we are too stupid and undisciplined to obey even ten laws, but at least we could give it a good faith effort.

Moses and his feckless brother, Aaron, gave the people over 600 additional "laws" --- the equivalent of statutory laws --- guaranteeing that all would be condemned.

So, here we are, between the Rock and the Hard Place and here is my humble suggestion:

1. Forget about trying to implement Sharia Law;

2. Set aside enforcement of all Statutory Laws;

3. Adopt the Law of the Kingdom of Heaven -- there are only three (3) laws in Heaven, and those allow everyone to save their skins;

4. Turn over the purloined property assets to me; I am the Fiduciary. I will return the land and soil to the peoples of the Earth without further adieu;

5. Agree to the establishment of a True Currency based on the value of all traded commodities and labor.

A lot of lawyers will be out of work, but that is a small price to pay----- especially as this is the only way that everyone keeps breathing.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

In the Tiger Suit

I come from a small town in the Midwest. High School sports are a big thing there and our team, the Tigers, had its own social glitterati attached to it. The Coach, the Teams, the Captains, the Cheerleaders, the Drum Majors and Majorettes-- and where was I in this midst of all this?

In the tiger suit. I was the team mascot. And nobody knew it but the gym teacher, either.

After everyone else was suited up and out on the field, I'd sneak downstairs to the janitor closet and struggle into the thirty pound costume and the crowd would roar with laughter when I appeared, because I always made it clear that I was late or having trouble with my tail or some darn thing.

I liked being the mascot -- a job everyone avoided, precisely because it was anonymous. I got to express the emotions of the home town contingent, leaping in the air with delight when there was a big score, skulking and shaking my paws when there was a bad referee call.

Any Vaudeville pratfall in the book was fair game. I got to kiss the Coach, pull down the Cheerleader's sweaters, chase lost balls, pick up litter, shepherd the elderly to their seats, and of course, lead the yearly Homecoming Day Parade --- all anonymously, of course.
And that's how I liked it, because it wasn't about me.

Now I realize that anonymous or relatively anonymous service isn't everyone's cup of tea, but I am the one who delivers in brown envelopes and doesn't write a return address on the package. I'm the one that finds your lost child at the grocery store and brings them back to you, then disappears while you are still kissing and scolding. Because it's not about me and I realize that it's not about me and I am okay with that. In fact, I prefer it that way.

So anyone coming to The American States Assembly and expecting to find conventional leadership and political bombast will be sadly disappointed. Unlike any political or social organization you have ever experienced, it won't be about centralized power and committee chairmen. And I, by far, won't have the answers to everything, solutions all neatly worked out, and everything in place, because it isn't a well-oiled machine yet. It's just getting started.

It will take a lot of people to make this work. Not just one old woman from Big Lake, Alaska.

Frankly, I am loathe to be the public face of it, or to be in any kind of public position at all. I am standing in the gate to make sure that the effort stays on course, fending off threats from without and threats from within, because if nothing else, our own ignorance and indoctrination is enough to do us in.

If we are to succeed in restoring our lawful government to full function and glory, its going take a lot of sacrifice and learning and teaching and growing. We have to learn history we've never been taught, processes in banking and law that we never knew existed, and while we are struggling along with our own daily traumas, we have to try to help everyone else through this process.

After that, we have to hold elections and run our own government. Everyone talks about self-governance--- but have you ever really thought about what that means? A whole government? One that is competent and serving the people as it should from the grassroots to the top?

It's a mammoth undertaking, and though we are starting with a firm foundation and the house plans, let's face up---- a hundred and fifty years of drifting off course and being commandeered by our purported "Allies" takes a tremendous toll.

We not only have to do the job before us, we have to retrain ourselves as we do it. We have to learn to think in new ways, and in view of the actual history, we have to make new assumptions about who we are as a nation and where we fit in the world and how things are supposed to work.

There's no central power coming down to us from on high. We have to do this all by ourselves from the grassroots upward, and while there are many observers cheering us on and hoping and praying to God that we succeed, there are others whose wishes for us and for our upstart government of the people, for the people, and by the people ---- are anything but kind.

Like the Founders, we are facing a challenge we never expected, a job we were never prepared to do. Those who have usurped our government have crippled us almost from birth, creating false assumptions, lying about or simply not disclosing the actual history, leaving us without the tools we need to get a grip on the situation, much less self-govern.

Governing us is something they are willing to do "for" us, so that they can profit from our ignorance and our wrong assumptions and our willingness to be led by authority figures, even if it is to our own self-destruction and the destruction of our country.

We haven't been taught that we are the only authority and that what happens in our world is up to us.

We've been taught just the opposite--- the better to control and to oppress and to misdirect us for the profit and the power of a few.

Now that we are awake and learning the truth about our past and also, our present situation, we find that the rest of the world is in an uproar, too. The Brits are realizing just how far they've been conned and beaten into submission. The French aren't willing to eke out their lives in penury anymore. And the Germans, well, the Germans well-know that theirs is a puppet government and that they of all people, have born the brunt of it all.

Things aren't going so well for the Bad Guys.

It appears that Group Number One's well-laid Plan B Fall Back Position-- to surreptitiously take over the Chinese Government with bribes of various kinds using Hong Kong as a backdoor-- and their bid to impose a worldwide gold standard isn't working. The Chinese have remembered their own history. The Opium Wars. The Boxer Rebellion. And so much more.

It also appears that Group Number Two, the Arab and Islamic World, isn't buying the candy or drinking the Kool-Aid anymore. They know they are being cheated and used as tools in the Globalist Agenda.
Teddy Roosevelt's sardonic Natural Resources Plan --- buy everyone else's resources on the cheap and save our own for later -- has been well-applied to them. As their own oil supplies and access to the world market dwindles, they find that the US had far greater oil resources hidden away the whole time.

Now let's hope that they further realize that "the US" is not America.
A lot more of us have to wake up to that same startling revelation-- that the "US" is not America-- and don our tiger suits. A lot more people like me, who have spent their lives being quiet and avoiding the limelight, have to step forward out of their comfort zone.

As we do, we face many challenges and many challengers.

Those who have profited by evil don't want to give it up. Those who are confused won't know who to believe -- at first. And the rest of us have to overcome odds that only Divine Providence can settle in our favor.

I recently read an article by Kevin Annett ---and I can't find it right now, so I can't quote directly -- but it was basically that we can't stand around waiting for what what others can do. We have to do what we can do. And that's what makes the difference.
He is right about that.
Much of what he is saying, is true.
I just hope his activities don't lead to wholesale destruction of churches and condemnation of Roman Catholics, the same way I hope the world will recognize that America is not responsible for the evils promoted by "the US"

Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·

Bear With Me

When I got up this morning, I had 48,332 emails in my inbox, and 8,113 of them were marked as "Urgent" or "Personal" or "Private" or "Government Business".

I literally get a hundred telephone calls a day. Minimum.

And piles of mail at two locations. I do mean -- piles of mail, more mail than one person could keep up with in a hundred years of hard trying.

Among the other slander I have suffered lately is the complaint that I am "not supportive" or "not responsive". I am "not doing my job" ---though I am unaware of having a job description, and God knows, my paycheck is apparently lost in the mail.

Given the facts, it's amazing that I get anything done but respond, respond, respond all day long, every day, 18 hours a day, seven days a week, non-stop.

The plain fact is that I CAN'T answer all these emails, phone calls, and letters.

I and those helping me are doing our best, but as volunteers running an all-volunteer organization, and as mere men and women who have to clean our own toilets and cook our own dinners --- we do what we can that is all we can do.

So don't be offended if I don't get right back to you, or if I don't get back to you at all. It's not that I am snubbing anyone. It's that I can't do it all, and we as a group are doing all that we can with the resources we have. Sometimes, too often, things simply overwhelm us and it is like being in a flood.

I also can't be available on demand to help with projects that other people have taken on. I try my best to keep everyone safe and operating within the law. I answer questions as I can, and that's about the best I can do.

Recently, I observed that The Living Law Firm is after the Arsonists and we cannot get bogged down fighting the brush fires. I said that and immediately got another two hundred appeals to help with court cases.

We are stretched beyond paper-thin in all respects.

Bear with me. Literally.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

We are stretched beyond paper-thin in all respects.

---

Actions made by people who are stressed are likely not rational or reasoned.

Anna von Reitz
15 hrs ·

The Chickens or Eggs Identity Theft Gambit

About five years ago, I learned that there was someone called "Anna von Reitz" in New York City, running around causing trouble. This came as a big surprise, because "Anna von Reitz" is a made-up name, and I am the one who made it up. It's a deliberate shortening of one of my family names for use as a pen name---and "von Reitzenstein" is by no means a common family name to begin with.

This "Person" was promoting check kiting and insurance frauds and applying for various programs in my pen name and as soon as I got wind of it, I went into the local State Troopers Office. What the young Trooper there told me was rather astounding.

There's nothing much that local law enforcement can do about this.

They have a national data base and a hotline number where you can call in and report the theft of your good name, but that's about it.
They don't actually do anything about it. It's just "flagged" to use his terminology, letting the authorities know that someone is using your name without your consent.

And as it turns out, we could report the government for the same thing, right?

I left his office feeling bewildered. If your name can be stolen, so can all the rest --- and that is, in fact, what we are experiencing in this country right now.

Those who have promoted this kind of identity theft, including those who compiled all the phony IRS Master Files, have become very adept at misrepresenting us.

No surprise, then, that they do this when they are running "ops" on our Assembly groups, either.

Two and a half years ago, we had a guy calling himself "Nathan" show up in the Utah State Militia group. He was a big, bluff, one-of-the-guys fellow, a rancher and hunter and football watcher. Or so we were led to believe. But he weaseled his way in and stole the money members contributed and blamed it on the group leader.

The DA charged the group leader with theft and jailed him on circumstantial evidence which was later proven untrue. Meantime, "Nathan" disappeared. This has happened at least two times since-- accusations of "theft" followed by the accusers blowing town.
"Nathan" in Utah is not the same as "Nate" in Arizona. We have had that confirmed both by Nate in Arizona and by photographs. The names are similar, but not the same.

Here's another loop for you ---
One of the perpetrators in North Carolina who attempted to steal another clump of money from group leaders there, pretended to be a Continental Marshal calling himself "Jim Garinger"---- a name that can be easily be confused with "John Garinger".

John Garinger from Arizona is not Jim Garinger from North Carolina and we have had that confirmed by witnesses and photos, too.

From two levels, from two different states of the Union, one man in Arizona has been targeted----both his nickname "Nate" and his actual name have been subjected to the similar-but-not-the-same routine.

I don't know what he's doing but it must be something right, to garner that much attention.

Here's another one.
My friend, Steven Duane Curry from Colorado, was picked up on a warrant for Stephen Duane Curry, born in another state and on a different day. The arresting officers beat him senseless for no reason.
My friend spent two years in a New Mexican jail being tortured and falsely accused before the rats let go of him ---- but only after forcing him to accept one false charge of resisting arrest as a condition of his release.

An infiltrator comes in, picks up names, and then the operatives of the government crime syndicate adopt "similar names"---only operating in a different state.

See the pattern? "Nathan" not "Nate". "Jim" not "John". "Stephen" not "Steven".

There's another pattern, too. Accusations of petty theft.

That was the claim in Utah, that was the attempted act in North Carolina, that was what was alleged about Chief Marshal Heywood, and more recently, with a slightly different twist--- I was accused of "stealing" someone else's work and "not paying them for it", when in fact I did no such thing and was under no such obligation.

So now that you know what is going on, you can see why we have to be on guard and why certain circumstances or actions or accusations act as triggers.

Similar names? My ears perk up and swivel around.

Accusations of theft? My ears come to rapt attention.

The same "name games" that are being applied to Americans in the Assembly groups can be applied to anyone in the general population, too. Just pick up a name of someone living in another state, and voila, more impersonation, more confusion, more excuses for false arrests, more defamation of innocent people.

I know a man named Joe DeAngelo who has no less than five criminal doppelgangers attached to him, not counting the government renditions. I told him to officially change his name to something like "Foxy Dolzano XYZ Sandersen the Third" and hope for the best.

And just to further demonstrate how bad this is, some of you may remember that I was discussing similar subjects one day in an article and quipped that I was adopting the name "Lady Flamolare del Chesa" in response to it all.

Well, guess what?
I may have to defend my copyright to "Lady Flamolare del Chesa", because there is someone out there actually using that name as well---- a name I made up out of the blue air.

The criminality of the "government" corporation service providers in this respect and the specific crimes of identity theft and impersonation and barratry practiced by the court system, has led to an absolute explosion of this kind of crime, and the more aware of it everyone is, the better.

Don't trust in names or, as the Bible says, in "Persons" --- they are being stolen every second of every day in ever-increasing numbers and for more and more purposes.

Make the effort to sort through similar but not the same names and look sharp when you realize that an "accidentally-on-purpose" confusion of this kind exists.

It means that you or your group is being targeted by criminals, though in itself, doesn't tell you which group of criminals.
Also learn to look for patterns in what you are seeing as they float to the top of the pot. The repeated pattern of accusations of theft is a good example.

Theft is a particularly handy accusation. It's hard to disprove in many cases, it immediately and thoroughly discredits whoever it is aimed at, and it universally causes distrust of whoever is being accused, isolating them from the group and rendering them less effective members of the group.

That's why it is popular among the criminals who are in fact pilfering group savings and project funds, running up credit cards, committing crimes "in our names" and causing other kinds of trouble.

As always, they accuse their victims of what they are doing themselves.

PaperUpNow.com

Public Notice


The site www.PaperUpNow.com has always been under the exclusive creation and sole ownership of jocelyne colombe©, a peaceful living woman.

It was achieved by compiling, sorting through and clarifying thousands of pages of data from a variety of sources.

It is being shut down permanently.

Thank you for the readership and your donations.

The owner has never given permission for anyone to move the site’s content to any website or mitigate the information formerly on this site to anyone or anywhere.

From its beginning through to the termination of www.PaperUpNow.com, the venue has provided education and knowledge for people to come together under mutual friendship.

Any name listed and ever found on the “Coordinator” page or any name related to this site through private calls or group teleconference calls including the moderators and guests of these calls is to be held harmless of any wrongdoing, myself included.

In addition, anyone connected to “Jural Assemblies” through this site was never given full disclosure, including myself, regarding the term “Jural Assembly”.

More specifically and not limited to that “Jural Assembly” has never been used as a lawful term in the founding documents of our country.

The owner became aware of this issue on May 27, 2019. As such, had she known this connection and the liability associated with it, it would have dissuaded her from joining or supporting any development of assemblies within her own state or any of the other states.

Anyone joining a “Jural Assembly” needs to do their own research as with any documents.

I, Jocelyne Colombe© revoke and rescind any prior association with the Arizona State Assembly and the support of other States towards the development of a State Assembly and or a State Jural Assembly ab initio.

In closing, believe in yourself. You are more powerful than you think or have been "programmed" to believe.

Most importantly, trust yourself more than anyone else. Never stop learning from MANY sources.

Be good to yourself and kind to others.

Enjoy the journey….

With love and hugs to the many I now call "friends for life".

jocelyne© aka jc© All Rights Reserved.