Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Xizang
(PS: I'm still on my first screen name here. How many have YOU had?)
I've had 3, and I've asked the mods to change it each time so no sock puppets here.
No way in hell you are not a sock puppet of someone, and since sock puppets are against the rules I put forward the motion that you be banned, all in favor say "aye" all opposed say "nay"
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
Lovely day in the neighborhood.
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
aye ............. your out of here banned for f life
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Xizang
Nay, and screw you.
Well the Ayes have it, not to mention this is a personal attack soooo things aren't looking good for you.
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
I do not offer a vote because the rules do not provide for a vote; this matter is at the discretion of JQP & Co.
The burden of proof lies upon the claimant; LuckyStrike has merely offered speculation to support his position. This farce of his may yet be considered a personal attack, and I advise Lucky that luck is the residue of design.
The only to conclusively determine who is a sockpuppet of whom is for an administrator to compare IP addresses. Posting from the same IP address within a short period of time on two accounts would indicate that they belong to the same user. As mundane users do not have access to IP data, none of us can make this determination.
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LuckyStrike
I've had 3, and I've asked the mods to change it each time so no sock puppets here.
No way in hell you are not a sock puppet of someone, and since sock puppets are against the rules I put forward the motion that you be banned, all in favor say "aye" all opposed say "nay"
nay. No one has proved the case. All on your assumption. Until the guy outs himself, then all allegations are a personal attack.
Re: How many of us might be considered "Dealers"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenrisulfr
I do not offer a vote because the rules do not provide for a vote; this matter is at the discretion of JQP & Co.
The burden of proof lies upon the claimant, LuckyStrike has merely offered speculation to support his position. This farce of his may yet be considered a personal attack, and I advise Lucky that luck is the residue of design.
The only to conclusively determine who is a sockpuppet of whom is for an administrator to compare IP addresses. Posting from the same IP address within a short period of time on two accounts would indicate that they belong to the same user. As mundane users do not have access to IP data, none of us can make this determination.
LOL, funny you should pipe up which brings us to our second order of business.
I make a motion that Fenris should also be banned because sock puppets are against site rules. All in favor say "aye" all opposed say "no"