Fractional Law Making and Moral Debt

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uncle Salty

Common Law works really well in a simpler time. But, are drunk driving laws bad? You can drive around drunk and never hurt anyone, so some might argue, why give tickets and criminalize drunk drivers if there are no victims? Others would argue that some victimless actions are worthy of being crimes. Where the line is drawn is the question. So let's say everyone agrees that criminalizing drunk driving is a good idea even though there is no victim. We agree because drunk driving will eventually lead to victims and it is better to prevent those as drunk driving has no real value for society.

---

There is no need to draw the line. Nothing has occured to require the interference of another person. The whole of the problem is described succinctly in your paragraph as quoted. It's people not minding their own business. It's people making other people do what they want them to do without any right to do so. It's people who don't mind their own damn business that is the problem.

Just remember..............................we know whats best for YOU...................

Great vid premise and comparison and, Sui Juris

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Glass

There is no need to draw the line. Nothing has occured to require the interference of another person. The whole of the problem is described succinctly in your paragraph as quoted. It's people not minding their own business. It's people making other people do what they want them to do without any right to do so. It's people who don't mind their own damn business that is the problem.

---

So would you view a law against drunk driving a valid law even though there is no victim?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Glass

There is no need to draw the line. Nothing has occured to require the interference of another person. The whole of the problem is described succinctly in your paragraph as quoted. It's people not minding their own business. It's people making other people do what they want them to do without any right to do so. It's people who don't mind their own damn business that is the problem.

---

So perhaps a law of life imprisonment with no parole from drunk drivers who get into accidents? That way you punish when there is a victim and the punishment is so harsh as to act as a deterrent?

I like the idea of a Law Jubilee. That way I can go out and hang all the God damned liars. :mad:

But seriously, hyperbole aside, that was one of the best video narrations I've heard.

People have no power to make or break LAW,

All that people can do is make and break rules and call rules LAW.

But if a rule attempts to break LAW...LAW will break the rule.

The so called Lawmakers have zero ability to do such.

They just fool the ignorant masses into thinking they do.

Quote:

---

Fractional law making politicians over expand the law supply through a fractional law making system.This inflation in the law supply leads to a devalue in the law. When laws are fractionally expanded they become more and more immoral and unjust. When citizen's are forced to live surrounded by degenerate laws their morals become devalued as a result.

These fractional laws are a paper illusion.

Fractional law making creates a moral debt in society.

---

I revised the quote in the original post because its author cannot capitalise nor correctly place his apostrophes, and I will not denigrate my posts with such things.

He is taking two things he does not like - fractional reserve banking, and excessive regulation - and making spurious comparisons between the two. The mechanics of fractional reserve banking have nothing to do with over-regulation aside from the fact that they are iterative processes. He can think what he pleases about laws on paper, but the gang of thieves that enforce them is very real.

It is a paper tiger at best, poorly written prattle at worst.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skirnir_

I revised the quote in the original post because its author cannot capitalise nor correctly place his apostrophes, and I will not denigrate my posts with such things.

He is taking two things he does not like - fractional reserve banking, and excessive regulation - and making spurious comparisons between the two. The mechanics of fractional reserve banking have nothing to do with over-regulation aside from the fact that they are iterative processes. He can think what he pleases about laws on paper, but the gang of thieves that enforce them is very real.

It is a paper tiger at best, poorly written prattle at worst.

---

Damn all of these compliments in one post, and I didnt even graduate from High School!

So there is no comparison to be made between the dollar/gold connection and the human/law connection? I beg to differ. I laid out very clearly how many similarities there are. I thought there was an interesting connection from a philosophical point of view NOT a literal one. Maybe you just like to nitpick, and point out where others are wrong? Maybe it was all of my custom artwork that distracted you from the main theme of my video? I can understand......

Gold is tangible right? Humans are tangible right? Can the State freely create gold or humans as much as they want? NO. But they can create paper all day long, and paper is a fiction.

I really dont mind people who disagree, as i like to learn and see other sides. But dont you think you could have communicated your thoughts a little more constructive?

I have an idea, you create something from nothing using an original thought and post it here for us. I promise i wont be too harsh on you. LOL


Thanks to the others who posted constructive criticisms, and to those who enjoyed my creation.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Santa

I like the idea of a Law Jubilee. That way I can go out and hang all the God damned liars. :mad:

But seriously, hyperbole aside, that was one of the best video narrations I've heard.

---

I hope your kidding. One of the hardest things to do is record your own voice. LOL Its is very hard not to sound to happy, to sad, to angry, to crazy, etc. Not to mention nobody likes the sound of their own voice. I did tweak it a bit, to throw the NSA off.

:)